[Ultraviolet radiation in the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus]. / UV-induzierte Pathogenese des Lupus erythematodes.

Photosensitivity represents an increased inflammatory reaction to sunlight, which can be observed particularly in the autoimmune disease lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) can be provoked by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and can cause both acute, nonscarring and chronic, scarring skin changes. In systemic lupus erythematosus, on the other hand, provocation by UV radiation can lead to flare or progression of systemic involvement. The etiology of lupus erythematosus is multifactorial and includes genetic, epigenetic and immunologic mechanisms. In this review, we address the effect of UV radiation on healthy skin and photosensitive skin using the example of lupus erythematosus. We describe possible mechanisms of UV-triggered immune responses that could offer therapeutic approaches. Currently, photosensitivity can only be prevented by avoiding UV exposure itself. Therefore, it is important to better understand the underlying mechanisms in order to develop strategies to counteract the deleterious effects of photosensitivity.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis and Future Therapeutic Directions.

Lupus erythematosus comprises a spectrum of autoimmune diseases that may affect various organs (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) or the skin only (cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]). Typical combinations of clinical, histological and serological findings define clinical subtypes of CLE, yet there is high interindividual variation. Skin lesions arise in the course of triggers such as ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, smoking or drugs; keratinocytes, cytotoxic T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) establish a self-perpetuating interplay between the innate and adaptive immune system that is pivotal for the pathogenesis of CLE. Therefore, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers and UV protection, topical therapies (glucocorticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) and rather unspecific immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs. Yet, the advent of licensed targeted therapies for SLE might also open new perspectives in the management of CLE. The heterogeneity of CLE might be attributable to individual variables and we speculate that the prevailing inflammatory signature defined by either T cells, B cells, pDCs, a strong lesional type I interferon (IFN) response, or combinations of the above might be suitable to predict therapeutic response to targeted treatment. Therefore, pretherapeutic histological assessment of the inflammatory infiltrate could stratify patients with refractory CLE for T-cell-directed therapies (e.g. dapirolizumab pegol), B-cell-directed therapies (e.g. belimumab), pDC-directed therapies (e.g. litifilimab) or IFN-directed therapies (e.g. anifrolumab). Moreover, Janus kinase (JAK) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitors might broaden the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future. A close interdisciplinary exchange with rheumatologists and nephrologists is mandatory for optimal treatment of lupus patients to define the best therapeutic strategy.

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus as a Paraneoplastic Manifestation of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Malignancies have been associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, such as dermatomyositis. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) can occur due to a wide array of cancers. Paraneoplastic SCLE obeys McLean's criteria and often regresses after the underlying malignancy has been treated appropriately. Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are often present in patients with paraneoplastic SCLE; however, there have been many instances where anti-Ro may not be present. We report a case of non-Hodgkin lymphoma causing SCLE, a malignancy not previously known to be associated with paraneoplastic SCLE. We also highlight the importance of perhaps prompt chemotherapy to treat the underlying malignancy, as a failure to do so may lead to worse patient outcomes.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus triggered after measles vaccination.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus that can be triggered by endogenous or exogenous factors. Among the exogenous factors are some medications, drugs, tobacco, infections, and vaccines. In this context, the benefits of vaccination are questioned because although it is important to prevent infections in immunosuppressed patients a theoretical risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains in these patients. This report presents a case of a previously healthy female patient who developed SCLE after measles vaccination and progressed to SLE and thereby suggests a possible trigger of the disease.

The pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: The aberrant distribution and function of different cell types in skin lesions.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease with a broad range of cutaneous manifestations. In skin lesions of CLE, keratinocytes primarily undergo apoptosis. Interferon-κ(IFN-κ) is belonged to type I interferons (type I IFNs) and is selectively produced by keratinocytes. Recently, keratinocytes selectively produced IFN-κ is identified to be a key to trigger type I interferon responses in CLE. Other immune cells such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are identified to be relevant origin of type I interferons (type I IFNs) which are central to the development of CLE lesions and responsible for mediating Th1 cell activity. Other types of cells such as neutrophils, B cells and Th17 cells also are involved in the development of this disease. The close interaction of those cells composes a comprehensive and complicated network in CLE. In this review, we discussed the aberrant distribution and function of different cells types involved in this disease and will offer a new direction for research and therapy in the near future.

New-onset cutaneous lupus erythematosus after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Vaccine development for COVID-19 has progressed expeditiously. To date, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the Moderna/mRNA-1273, Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), and Johnson & Johnson's Janssen (JNJ-78436735) vaccines for use in the United States. Immediate side effects have included myalgia fatigue, chills, fever, and headache. We report an elderly patient with a history of lung cancer and no prior history of autoimmune disease who developed cutaneous lupus erythematosus two ½ months after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: factors related to cutaneous activity and damage in a cohort of 260 patients from A Coruña, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a chronic autoimmune disease that can leave important sequelae. OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors that predict the activity and damage of the skin disease, and the impact of tobacco on the efficacy of antimalarials using the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive case series was performed on 260 patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (α = 0.05; precision ± 6.5%). We carried out a descriptive analysis of the variables included, with a multivariate analysis to measure the association of variables with the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity and damage (p value < 0.05). RESULTS: The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity was greater in smokers than non-smokers (4.0 ±5.3 vs 1.2 ±3.4, p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity when the efficacy of antimalarials was analyzed between smokers and non-smokers. Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index damage was higher in smokers than in non-smokers (2.0 ± 3.6 vs 1.2 ± 2.6, p = 0.029). Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity was associated with: (a) being an active smoker (odds ratio 3.04, 95% confidence interval 1.68-5.51, p < 0.001; regression coefficient 2.05, 95% confidence interval 0.69-3.42, p = 0.003); (b) the chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtype (odds ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.84, p = 0.044); and (c) C-reactive protein increase (≥0.5 mg/dL) (regression coefficient 2.56, 95% confidence interval 0.40-4.71, p = 0.020). Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index damage was associated with: (a) the activity (regression coefficient 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.20, p = 0.024); (b) the chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtype (regression coefficient 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.37-3.56, p < 0.001); (c) the use of topical treatment (regression coefficient 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.01-2.61, p = 0.049); and (d) systemic treatment (regression coefficient 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.35-2.53, p < 0.010). CONCLUSION: Smoking is related to an increase risk and a greater activity of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtype and an increased C-reactive protein level were also associated with a higher disease activity. The sequelae were related to the activity, the chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtype, and the use of topical and systemic treatment. The impact of tobacco on the efficacy of antimalarials may be caused by an increase in the severity of the disease more than by resistance in smokers.

Anti TNF como inductor de lupus cutáneo: caso clínico / Anti TNF as inducer of cutaneous lupus: clinical case

El mayor acceso a las terapias biológicas para el tratamiento de múltiples enfer-medades autoinmune trae consigo el mayor riesgo de padecer eventos adversos relacionados al uso de estos2,4. Presentamos un caso clínico de una paciente con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoide en tratamiento con ANTI TNF

The greater access to biological therapies for the treatment of multiple autoim-mune diseases brings with it the greatest risk of suffering adverse events related to the use of these (2,4). We present a clinical case of a patient diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in treatment with ANTI TNF

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: clinico-pathologic correlation.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic-relapsing disease. It is defined as a LE localized to the skin without any significant systemic symptoms. Its annual incidence is of 4 cases per 100,000 persons with a prevalence of 73 cases per 100,000 persons. The etiology is unknown but it is considered as a prototype of autoimmune disease in which genetic factors (HLA), environmental factors (photo exposure and cigarette smoking) and pharmacological agents play an important role. The most accepted classification includes three clinical variants: acute (ACLE), subacute (SCLE) and chronic (CCLE). A fourth variety is the intermittent form (ICLE) also called "lupus tumidus" (LET) which is considered by some authors a distinct form from CCLE. The skin lesions are subdivided into LE specific and LE non-specific. The latter have a considerable importance as a symptom of evolution of the disease towards a systemic form of lupus (SLE). The histopathology of CLE is characterized by an interface dermatitis with vacuolization of the basal layer, a predominantly lymphocytic, perivascular and periadnexal infiltrate, epidermal and follicular hyperkeratosis, deposit of positive PAS material at the dermo-epidermal junction leading to atrophic-cicatricial evolution. Depending on the clinical variants, these microscopic features are more or less evident and are associated with peculiarities such as deposits of mucin (SCLE and LET), involvement of the panniculus in LE panniculitis, disappearance of the adnexa (cicatricial alopecia). The relationship between SLE/CLE is still under study: the progression of CLE in SLE is reported in a variable percentage of cases ranging from 12 to 18%. CLE therapy is aimed at preventing recurrences and scarring outcomes. Photoprotection with clothing, chemical and physical sunscreens active on UVA and UVB radiations is very important. Topical therapy is based on the use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, while the systemic therapy includes hydroxychloroquine as the first drug of choice.

A comparison of patients' and physicians' assessments of disease activity using the Swedish version of the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: We compared patients' assessments of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity by a Swedish version of the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) with physicians' assessments by the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). We also explored the performance of the SLAQ in patients with short (< 1 year) versus long (≥ 1 year) disease duration. METHOD: Patients filled out the SLAQ before physicians' assessments. Correlations between SLAQ total, subscales (Symptom score, Flares, Patients global) and SLAM and SLEDAI-2K, as well as between the corresponding items in SLAQ and SLAM, were evaluated using Spearman's ρ. Comparisons between patients with different disease durations were performed with Mann-Whitney U or chi-squared tests. RESULTS: We included 203 patients (79% women), with a median age of 45 years [interquartile range (IQR) 33-57 years] and disease duration of 5 years (IQR 0-14 years). Correlations between physicians' SLAM without laboratory items (SLAM-nolab) and patients' assessments were: SLAQ total, ρ = 0.685, Symptom score, ρ = 0.651, Flares, ρ = 0.547, and Patients global, ρ = 0.600. Of the symptom items, fatigue (ρ = 0.640), seizures (ρ = 0.635), and headache (ρ = 0.604) correlated most closely. Neurology/stroke syndrome, skin, and lymphadenopathy correlated less well (ρ < 0.24). Patients' and physicians' assessments were notably more discordant for patients with short disease durations. CONCLUSION: We confirm that the SLAQ can be used to monitor disease activity. However, the discrepancy between patients' and physicians' assessments was greater for patients with short versus long disease duration. We encourage further use of the SLAQ, but would like to develop a shorter version which would be valuable in modern, partly web-based, clinical care.