Comparison of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis in rats.

In this study, we wanted to investigate the effectiveness of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in reducing inflammation in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) model using rats. We divided 56 male Sprague-Dawley rats into seven groups and induced RA using complete Freund's adjuvant. Some groups received HBOT, whereas others were given etanercept or leflunomide. We started the treatment on the 10th day after inducing RA and continued it for 18 days. To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments, we measured paw swelling and used X-rays to examine the joints before and after the treatment. We also analysed the levels of two inflammatory markers, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1ß, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, we conducted histological analysis and assessed the expressions of anti-IL-1ß and anti-TNF-α antibodies. All the treatment groups showed a significant decrease in arthritis scores, paw swelling and levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß. The X-ray images revealed improvements in joint structure, and the histopathological analysis showed reduced inflammation and collagen abnormalities. Combining DMARD with HBOT had similar effects to individual therapies, suggesting a cost-effective and potentially safer approach for improving outcomes in rats with RA.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion. RESULTS: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Leflunomide as adjunct therapy for BK viremia management in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK viremia after kidney transplantation (KT) poses significant risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy and impacts graft survival. Conventional treatment involves reduction of immunosuppression, which in turn may increase risk for rejection. To address this dilemma, use of anti-viral therapy with immunosuppressive properties such as leflunomide is an attractive option. METHODS: We performed a multi-center, retrospective chart review to report tolerability and effectiveness of leflunomide use for the eradication of BK viremia and prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy in pediatric KT recipients. RESULTS: Seventy patients prescribed leflunomide were included and were followed up from initiation until 1 year following leflunomide completion. BK viremia was eradicated in 64 (91.4%) patients including 8 of 11 with nephropathy (BKVN) on initial biopsy. Reduced anti-proliferative medication (AP) dosing was not associated with increase in biopsy proven rejection (BPAR). However, complete discontinuation of AP during leflunomide therapy was associated with increase in BPAR in uni- and multivariate logistic regression, as was targeted reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) trough goals. One graft was lost to BKVN. There was no significant association found between time to BK eradication and leflunomide trough concentration, mycophenolate dose reduction, or steroid use (univariate logistic regression). Few leflunomide adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported (most commonly: gastrointestinal, hematologic). CONCLUSION: Leflunomide is a promising adjunctive treatment to immunosuppression reduction for BK virus eradication with minimal ADR. AP reduction, not discontinuation, and judicious reduction in CNI trough goals with close monitoring, is a promising strategy for treatment of BK viremia with concomitant use of leflunomide therapy.

Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury potentiated by a drug-drug interaction between cyclosporine, leflunomide, and rosuvastatin in a kidney transplant recipient: A missed opportunity for pharmacist involvement.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe a case of rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury potentiated by a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporine, leflunomide, and rosuvastatin in a kidney transplant recipient. CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old male with end-stage kidney disease secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension received a deceased by cardiac death kidney transplant. The patient's medical history included coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia for which he was receiving rosuvastatin 40 mg daily. Five months after transplant, the patient developed BK viremia, which required multiple changes in immunosuppression and resulted in the initiation of leflunomide and cyclosporine modified. The patient used multiple pharmacies and coupon cards that delayed the identification of the DDIs between leflunomide, cyclosporine, and rosuvastatin. Approximately, 13 months after transplant, the biopsy report of the patient's allograft kidney showed acute cellular rejection Banff IB, hypertensive changes, and transplant glomerulopathy. This prompted the patient to receive a 3-day course of methylprednisolone 250 mg intravenous at the outpatient infusion center. Two weeks later, the patient presented to the transplant clinic with lightheadedness, dizziness, weakness, fatigue, bilateral eye drainage, and a decrease in appetite and was admitted to the hospital for further workup. On admission, creatine kinase was 2080 IU/L with myoglobin of 7601 ng/mL. The patient's diagnosis was statin myopathy with possible rhabdomyolysis acute kidney injury. Likely contributing factors included cyclosporine, leflunomide, and rosuvastatin DDI and administration of high-dose methylprednisolone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This case demonstrates the importance of pharmacist involvement throughout all phases of care in a kidney transplant recipient.

Long-term efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone in treatment of myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Leflunomide and low-dose prednisone (0.25 mg/kg/day) (LEF + Pred) rapidly improved the clinical symptoms of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. Here, we aimed to analyze the long-term efficacy and safety of LEF + Pred in MG patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled MG patients treated with LEF + Pred in our center between 2012 and 2020. We reviewed all the MG patients continuously treated with LEF + Pred for more than 1 year. MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) profile score and quantitative MG scale (QMG) score in each clinical follow-up visits were collected for the efficacy analysis. The laboratory testing results of MG patients, the relevant chief complain and physical examination results in each follow-up visits were collected for the safety evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were examined. Effective treatment was achieved in 58.3% of patients after 1 month and in 88.4% after 12 months. Overall, 63 patients (61.2%) exhibited only minimal manifestations after 12 months of treatment. The average MG-ADL score decreased from 6.0 to 1.0, while the average QMG score decreased from 10.0 to 4.0. The decrease in MG-ADL and QMG scores of patients with generalized MG was more pronounced than those of the ocular MG patients. Patients with MG who had a thymectomy had a smaller decrease in MG-ADL and QMG scores than those who did not have a thymectomy. Sixteen adverse effects associated with LEF + Pred were observed; none was severe. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LEF + Pred therapy could considerably improve clinical symptoms in MG patients while being well tolerated with just few side effects.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2. RESULTS: A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.

[Translated article] Biological and immunosuppressive medications in pregnancy, breastfeeding and fertility in immune mediated diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to gather the available evidence on the different drugs used in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in pregnancy, lactation, their influence on female and male fertility, advice on discontinuation before conception and to help in routine clinical practice for better patient advice on family planning. METHODS: A bibliographic search was carried out, where published articles (review studies, observational studies and case series) in English or Spanish until April 2020 that analyzed the management of pregnancy, lactation and/or fertility in patients on treatment in immune-mediated diseases were selected. RESULTS: A total of 95 references were selected and the information on each drug was synthesized in tables. Drugs contraindicated in pregnancy are topical retinoids, pimecrolimus, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide, acitretin, and thiopurines. The lack of data advises against the use of apremilast, tofacitinib, baricitinib, anakinra, abatacept, tocilizumab and the new biologicals. Topical salicylates, paracetamol, ultraviolet therapy and hydroxychloroquine treatment are safe, and anti-TNF biological therapy are considered low risk, with certolizumab being the drug of choice throughout pregnancy and lactation. Most are compatible with paternal exposure except for sulfasalazine, mycophenolate and leflunomide, for which suspension of treatment prior to conception is recommended, and cyclosporine with dose requirements of less than 2 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of chronic treatments with teratogenic potential, it is necessary to highlight the importance of pregnancy planning to select the safest drug. Given the quality of the available data, it is still necessary to continuously update the information, as well as to promote observational studies of cohorts of pregnant patients and men of childbearing age, including prospective studies, in order to generate more scientific evidence.

Biological and immunosuppressive medications in pregnancy, breastfeeding and fertility in immune mediated diseases. / Medicamentos inmunosupresores y biológicos en el embarazo, la lactancia y la fertilidad en enfermedades inmunomediadas.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to gather the available evidence on the different drugs used in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in pregnancy, lactation, their influence on female and male fertility, advice on discontinuation before conception and to help in routine clinical practice for better patient advice on family planning. METHODS: A bibliographic search was carried out, where published articles (review studies, observational studies and case series) in English or Spanish until April 2020 that analyzed the management of pregnancy, lactation and/or fertility in patients on treatment in immune-mediated diseases were selected. RESULTS: A total of 95 references were selected and the information on each drug was synthesized in tables. Drugs contraindicated in pregnancy are topical retinoids, pimecrolimus, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide, acitretin, and thiopurines. The lack of data advises against the use of apremilast, tofacitinib, baricitinib, anakinra, abatacept, tocilizumab and the new biologicals. Topical salicylates, paracetamol, ultraviolet therapy and hydroxychloroquine treatment are safe, and anti-TNF biological therapy are considered low risk, with certolizumab being the drug of choice throughout pregnancy and lactation. Most are compatible with paternal exposure except for sulfasalazine, mycophenolate and leflunomide, for which suspension of treatment prior to conception is recommended, and cyclosporine with dose requirements of less than 2mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of chronic treatments with teratogenic potential, it is necessary to highlight the importance of pregnancy planning to select the safest drug. Given the quality of the available data, it is still necessary to continuously update the information, as well as to promote observational studies of cohorts of pregnant patients and men of childbearing age, including prospective studies, in order to generate more scientific evidence.

Effect of Leflunomide Use on 68Ga-DOTATATE Biodistribution in a Case With Neuroendocrine Tumor.

ABSTRACT: A 58-year-old man who underwent surgery for a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of pancreatic origin was evaluated with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging in the follow-up period. After PET/CT findings consistent with disease remission, the patient was started on leflunomide treatment with the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. The patient received leflunomide for 6 months. Then, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan was repeated to evaluate the primary disease outcome. Besides the disease remission, we also observed alterations in DOTATATE uptakes of some tissues and organs. In this case, we present the changes in 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan findings after leflunomide use.

Clinical evaluation of efficacy of leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone for treatment of myasthenia gravis.

This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone (0.25 mg/kg/day) for treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). We enrolled 32 MG patients treated with leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone. In the control group, 14 patients were treated with low-dose prednisone. Improvement in MG composite (MGC) score of ≥ 3 points from enrollment to 12-week follow-up indicated that the treatment was effective. In the leflunomide combined low-dose prednisone group, the median of MGC score at the time of enrollment was 8.5 points. After 12 weeks, the MGC score dropped to four points. There was statistically significant difference in MGC score before and after treatment (p < 0.001). In the low-dose prednisone group also followed up for 12 weeks, the median of MGC score of the patients decreased from 7 to 4 points, and the change was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). In the leflunomide combined low-dose prednisone group, the improvement of clinical symptoms occurred mainly in the first 4 weeks and the last 4 weeks. Relatively, the decline of the score was mostly seen during the first 8 weeks in the low-dose prednisone group. In leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone group, the effective rate of generalized MG(gMG) was significantly higher than ocular MG(oMG) (χ2 test, p = 0.036). However, there is no significant difference in the effective rate between AChR-Ab-positive and -negative groups (Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.625). No serious side effects were observed in any of the subjects. Leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone rapidly improved the clinical symptoms of patients with MG. It may be a promising treatment for gMG.

The Effect of Leflunomide as Adjunctive Therapy With a TNF Inhibitor in Pediatric Patients With Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To describe the effectiveness of leflunomide as adjunctive therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in pediatric patients with uveitis who are not able to tolerate methotrexate. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed of pediatric patients who were receiving leflunomide in conjunction with anti-TNF agent therapy after intolerance to a combination of methotrexate with anti-TNF therapy. Dose and duration of methotrexate, leflunomide, and anti-TNF therapy were recorded. Extensive history, demographics, laboratory data, and uveitis flare rate were obtained. RESULTS: A total of five children were included in the study. Most patients were initially receiving methotrexate and an anti-TNF agent was added subsequently due to inadequate response to monotherapy. After discontinuation of methotrexate, leflunomide was initiated with anti-TNF therapy. The replacement of methotrexate with leflunomide showed decreased side effects and was associated with lower flare rates and steroid-free remission. CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide was found to be well tolerated and effective at maintaining uveitis quiescence in conjunction with anti-TNF agents in pediatric patients who do not tolerate methotrexate. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(6):417-420.].

Leflunomide abrogates neuroinflammatory changes in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease: the role of TNF-α/NF-κB/IL-1ß axis inhibition.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases and is associated with disrupted cognition and behavior. Neuroinflammatory pathogenesis is the main component that contributes to AD initiation and progression through microglial activation and neuronal damage. Thus, targeting inflammatory pathways may help manage AD. In this study, for the first time, the potential prophylactic and therapeutic effects of leflunomide were investigated either alone or in combination with rivastigmine in aluminum chloride (AlCl3)-induced AD-like rats using behavioral, biochemical, and histological approaches. Thirty-six adult male albino rats were divided into two protocols: the treatment protocol, subdivided into five groups (n = 6)-(1) control group, (2) AlCl3 (50, 70, 100 mg/kg/I.P) group, (3) reference group (rivastigmine 2 mg/kg/P.O.), (4) experimental group (leflunomide 10 mg/kg/P.O.), and (5) combination group (rivastigmine + leflunomide); and the prophylactic protocol (leflunomide 10 mg/kg/P.O.), which started 2 weeks before AlCl3 induction. The results showed that AlCl3 disrupted learning and memory parameters in rats and increased amyloid-ß plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangle aggregation. Moreover, AlCl3 administration markedly elevated acetylcholinesterase activity, nuclear factor-kappa ß, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-1 beta, and marked degenerative changes in the pyramidal neurons. However, administration of leflunomide alone or with rivastigmine in AlCl3-induced AD rats restored most of the behavioral, biochemical, and histological parameters triggered by AlCl3 in rats. Our findings suggest that leflunomide can potentially restore most of the neuronal damage in the hippocampal tissues of AlCl3-induced AD rats. However, these preclinical findings still need to be confirmed in clinical trials.

Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Biologics.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to describe the distinct features of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: Data from the German biologics in pediatric rheumatology registry (Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie) collected between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In 5009 JIA patients, 28 developed confirmed IBD before the age of 18 years: 23 (82.1%) with Crohn disease (CD), 4 (14.3%) with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1 (3.6%) with IBD-unclassified (IBD-U). The incident rate of IBD during 20 years of observation was 0.56% (0.46% for CD, 0.08% for UC, and 0.02% for IBD-U), of whom 20.3% were HLA-B27 positive, 25% had enthesitis-related arthritis, and 14.3% psoriatic arthritis. Within 90 days before IBD diagnosis, 82.1% (n = 23) received treatment with etanercept (ETA), 39.3% (n = 11) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 17.9% (n = 5) systemic corticosteroids, 8 (28.6%) methotrexate (MTX), 14.3% (n = 4) sulfasalazine, 10.7% (n = 3) leflunomide, and 3.6% (n = 1) adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The incidence of IBD was lower in patients treated with MTX, but higher in patients treated with ETA except if ETA was combined with MTX. Also in patients on leflunomide or sulfasalazine, the IBD incidence was higher. CONCLUSIONS: In our JIA cohort, an increased IBD incidence is observed compared to the general population, and the ratio of CD to UC is markedly higher hinting at a distinct phenotype of IBD. Pretreatment with MTX seems to be protective. Treatment with ETA does not prevent IBD development and JIA patients treated with leflunomide and sulfasalazine may be at an increased risk for IBD development.

Outcome of solid and cavitary pulmonary nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients-case series.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid pulmonary nodule can be detected in up to 32% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and approximately one-third of nodules may cavitate. We aimed to evaluate characteristics of patients with RA developing cavitary pulmonary nodular (CPN) lesions under disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), follow-up of both cavitary and solid nodules, and their outcome with the treatment. METHODS: RA patients who presented with CPN lesions during follow-up were recruited retrospectively in this case series analysis. Total numbers and mean diameters of cavitary and solid nodules in each thorax computed tomography (CT) have been determined and followed up by two experienced pulmonary physicians. Moreover, changes in treatment after the development of the CPN lesions and characteristics of cavitary nodules were collected. RESULTS: Eleven patients with CPN lesions were reported. At the time of CPN diagnosis, more patients were taking leflunomide than methotrexate (81% vs 19%). Half of the patients were receiving biologic therapy and only 18% were taking anti-TNF drugs. After a median of 24 (3-65) months of follow-up, the regression of CPN lesions was determined in 45% (5/11) of patients. Four of these 5 (80%) patients were switched to a treatment regimen without leflunomide and three of them to nonanti-TNF biologic treatment or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tocilizumab, tofacitinib, and rituximab). DISCUSSION: CPN lesions seen in RA patients are often pulmonary manifestations of the underlying disease; however, one must rule out malignancies or infections. If lesions progress under DMARDs, it is advised to discontinue synthetic DMARDs (LEF/MTX) and switch to another biological DMARD with different modes of action.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in inflammatory arthritis: Relationship with cardiovascular risk.

Liver disease is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide whose prevalence is dramatically increasing. The first sign of hepatic damage is inflammation which could be accompanied by the accumulation of fat called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), causing damage in the hepatocytes. This stage can progress to fibrosis where the accumulation of fibrotic tissue replaces healthy tissue reducing liver function. The next stage is cirrhosis, a late phase of fibrosis where a high percentage of liver tissue has been replaced by fibrotic tissue and liver functionality is substantially impaired. There is a close interplay of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hepatic alterations, where different mechanisms mediating this relation between the liver and systemic vasculature have been described. In chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in which the CVD risk is high, hepatic alterations seem to be more prevalent compared to the general population and other rheumatic disorders. The pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of this comorbidity are still unraveled, although chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, treatments, and metabolic deregulation seem to have an important role. In this review, we will discuss the involvement of liver disease in the cardiovascular risk associated with inflammatory arthritis, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the recognized factors involved. Likewise, monitoring of the liver disease risk in routine clinical practice through both, classical and novel techniques and indexes will be exposed. Finally, we will examine the latest controversies that have been raised about the effects of the current therapies used to control the inflammation in RA and PsA, in the liver damage of those patients, such as methotrexate, leflunomide or biologics.

Retrospective analysis of leflunomide and low-dose methylprednisolone for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy combined with membranous nephropathy.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) combined with Membranous Nephropathy (MN) was observed in some patients with the increasing of Diabetic patients. However, no treatment guidelines are available for DKD combined with MN. In this study, we for the first time analyzed the safety and efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) combined with low-dose glucocorticoid methylprednisolone (MP) in the treatment of DKD with MN. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with the highest number of DKD combined with MN diagnosed by renal biopsy between December 2016 and December 2020. The inclusion criteria were a history of diabetes for more than 20 months, no glucocorticoid therapy or immunosuppressant therapy for at least 6 months, urine protein level greater than 3.5 g, and a follow-up time of 16 months. In addition to conservative treatment, the patients received LEF monotherapy (LEF, n = 38) or LEF combined with low-dose methylprednisolone (LEF+MP, n = 26). After 16 months of treatment, the complete remission rate was 2.6%, and the remission rate was 15.8% in the LEF group; in the LEF+MP group, the complete remission rate and the remission rate were 23.1% and 34.6%, respectively. At month 16, the urine protein level was lower than the baseline value in both groups (p < 0.05) and was significantly lower in the LEF+MP group than in the LEF group (p < 0.05). Serum albumin levels were higher than the baseline value in both groups (p < 0.05), with no significant between-group difference (p > 0.05). No inter- or intragroup difference in serum creatinine or glycated hemoglobin was observed. During treatment, the relapse rate was lower in the LEF+MP group than in the LEF group (p < 0.05). No irreversible adverse events were observed. In summary, LEF+MP is more effective than LEF monotherapy for DKD combined with MN. Large, long-term, randomized, double-blind, controlled studies are needed to further validate the clinical efficacy of LEF+MP.

Leflunomide versus azathioprine for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial and long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have compared mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). Leflunomide is an immunosuppressant widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this investigator-initiated study was to compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for LN. METHODS: 270 adult patients with biopsy-confirmed active LN from 7 Chinese Rheumatology Centres were enrolled. All patients received induction therapy with 6-9 months of intravenous cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoids. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) were randomised to receive prednisone in combination with leflunomide or azathioprine as maintenance therapy for 36 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to kidney flare. Secondary outcomes included clinical parameters, extrarenal flare and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were randomly allocated to the leflunomide group (n=108) and azathioprine group (n=107). Kidney flares were observed in 17 (15.7%) leflunomide-treated patients and 19 (17.8%) azathioprine-treated patients. Time to kidney flare did not statistically differ (leflunomide: 16 months vs azathioprine: 14 months, p=0.676). 24-hour proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum C3 and serum C4 improved similarly. Extrarenal flare occurred in two patients from the azathioprine group and one patient from the leflunomide group. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups: leflunomide 56.5% and azathioprine 58.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile of leflunomide are non-inferior to azathioprine for maintenance therapy of LN. Leflunomide may provide a new candidate for maintenance therapy in patients with LN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01172002.

In Vitro Study Evaluating the Effect of Different Immunosuppressive Agents on Human Polyomavirus BK Replication.

BACKGROUND: Human polyomavirus BK (BKPyV) is the etiologic agent of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, a leading cause of kidney transplant dysfunction. Because of the lack of antiviral therapies, immunosuppression minimization is the recommended treatment. This strategy offers suboptimal outcomes and entails a significant risk of rejection. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of different immunosuppressive drugs (leflunomide, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus, and everolimus) and their combinations in an in vitro model of BKPyV infection. METHODS: Human renal tubular epithelial cells were infected with BKPyV and treated with leflunomide, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus, and everolimus, administered alone or in some combination thereof. Viral replication was assessed every 24 hours (up to 72 hours) by BKPyV-specific quantitative real-time polymerized chain reaction for the VIRAL PROTEIN 1 sequence in cell supernatants and by western blot analysis targeting the viral protein 1 and the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase on total protein lysates. Results were described as viral copies/mL and compared between treatments at any prespecified time point of the study. RESULTS: The highest inhibitory effects were observed using leflunomide or everolimus plus mycophenolic acid (mean BKPyV replication log reduction 0.28). The antiviral effect of everolimus persisted when it was used in combination with tacrolimus (mean BKPyV replication log reduction 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that everolimus has anti-BKPyV properties and prompts future research to investigate possible mechanisms of action. It also provides a rational basis for targeted clinical trials evaluating alternative immunosuppressive modification strategies.

Impaired adrenal cortex reserve in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases who relapse upon tapering of low glucocorticoid dose.

OBJECTIVES: To examine adrenal cortex reserve in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) who relapse upon tapering of low glucocorticoid dose, despite concomitant treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: A morning standard dose of 250 mcg tetracosactide (Synacthen test) was given in 25 consecutive patients (13 rheumatoid arthritis, 2 psoriatic arthritis, 5 systemic lupus erythematosus, 2 dermatomyositis, 1 systemic sclerosis, 2 temporal arteritis) at the time of relapse upon small reductions (1-2 mg daily) of low prednisolone dose (<7.5 mg daily), while being on stable concomitant treatment with methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, mycophenolate, tofacitinib, belimumab, anti-TNF, anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-1 regimens (n=14; 3; 9; 1; 2; 1; 1; 5; 2; 1, respectively). Sex-matched apparently healthy individuals (n=45) served as controls. RESULTS: Baseline cortisol levels and time-integrated cortisol response to tetracosactide were lower in patients than controls (12.01±4.47 vs. 15.63±4.16 mcg/dl, p=0.001, and 1050±286 vs. 1284±182, p<0.001, respectively). No significant associations were observed between the cortisol response to tetracosactide and age, duration of disease or glucocorticoid treatment. An abnormal Synacthen test, indicative of adrenal insufficiency, presumably secondary to chronic glucocorticoid administration, was noted in 5/25 patients. The remaining 20 patients (80%) had normal Synacthen test demonstrating, however, lower cortisol response than controls, independently of age (ß-coefficient=-0.373, p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RMD in remission under DMARDs who relapse upon concomitant low glucocorticoid dose tapering should be tested for iatrogenic adrenal insufficiency. Whether a marginally normal Synacthen test should discourage further attempts to withdraw glucocorticoid treatment in these patients warrants further investigation.

Infectious risk of add-on leflunomide or tacrolimus versus TNF inhibitors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To compare infectious risk between leflunomide versus TNF inhibitors (TNFi), and between tacrolimus versus TNFi among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Using Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a cohort study on RA patients initiating TNFi, leflunomide, or tacrolimus. The primary outcome was any serious infections defined as a composite endpoint of serious bacterial, opportunistic, and herpes zoster infections. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome. Propensity-score fine-stratification (PSS) and weighting were applied to adjust for confounding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models comparing leflunomide versus TNFi, and tacrolimus versus TNFi. RESULTS: Among 72,516 RA patients receiving MTX, we identified 3,336 TNFi initiators, 11,122 leflunomide initiators, and 5,136 tacrolimus initiators. Two study cohorts were 10,992 leflunomide initiators PSS-weighted on 1,623 TNFi initiators and 5,126 tacrolimus initiators PSS-weighted on 2,521 TNFi initiators. The incidence rate per 100 person-years of herpes zoster infection (3.70-4.27) was beyond 3-times that of serious bacterial infection (1.12-1.36), but opportunistic infection was relatively rare (0.11-0.23). The PSS-weighted HR [95% CI] for any serious infection was 1.03 [0.89-1.22] comparing leflunomide versus TNFi, and 0.91 [0.77-1.08] comparing tacrolimus versus TNFi. Analyses on the secondary outcomes showed consistent results. CONCLUSION: In this nation-wide cohort study, we did not find a significant difference in the risk of serious infections (i.e., serious bacterial, opportunistic, and herpes zoster infections) between leflunomide versus TNFi, and between tacrolimus versus TNFi among RA patients receiving background MTX.