Embryo-fetal exposure and developmental outcome of lenalidomide following oral administration to pregnant cynomolgus monkeys.

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug and is very effective in the management of a number of malignancies, including multiple myeloma. Like thalidomide, lenalidomide interacts with the cereblon E3 ligase complex, which results in targeted destruction of proteins. This study was conducted to study the teratogenic potential of lenalidomide when administered to pregnant cynomolgus monkeys. Lenalidomide was administered orally on gestation days 20-50 at dosages of 0 (vehicle control), 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg/day. Thalidomide was used as a positive control and was administered orally at 15 mg/kg/day on gestation days 26-28. Each group consisted of 5 pregnant monkeys. Pregnancy was terminated on gestation day 100 ± 1 by cesarean section and fetuses examined for external, internal and skeletal changes. Intrauterine loss was 40% in the thalidomide group and 20 % in each of the lenalidomide 2 and 4 mg/kg/day groups. Treatment with lenalidomide and thalidomide resulted in no effects on placental weights, fetal body weights and body measurements. External fetal examination revealed malformations in fetuses of all lenalidomide-treated groups, including malformations of upper and lower extremities. These external malformations had correlated skeletal findings and were similar to those seen in the thalidomide-treated group, where two of three fetuses showed the classic thalidomide syndrome of malformed upper and lower extremities. A no-observed-adverse-effect level was not identified in this study, and the mean maternal exposures at the lowest dosage, where fetal malformations were observed, were 5-folder lower than the exposures observed in the MM patients treated with 25 mg of lenalidomide.

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis: results from a large cohort of patients with long follow-up.

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) is a standard treatment in relapsed/refractory immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis (RRAL). We retrospectively investigated toxicity, efficacy and prognostic markers in 260 patients with RRAL. Patients received a median of two prior treatment lines (68% had been bortezomib-refractory; 33% had received high-dose melphalan). The median treatment duration was four cycles. The 3-month haematological response rate was 31% [very good haematological response (VGHR) in 18%]. The median follow-up was 56·5 months and the median overall survival (OS) and haematological event-free survival (haemEFS) were 32 and 9 months. The 2-year dialysis rate was 15%. VGHR resulted in better OS (62 vs. 26 months, P < 0·001). Cardiac progression predicted worse survival (22 vs. 40 months, P = 0·027), although N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) increase was frequently observed. Multivariable analysis identified these prognostic factors: NT-proBNP for OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1·71; P < 0·001]; gain 1q21 for haemEFS (HR 1·68, P = 0·014), with a trend for OS (HR 1·47, P = 0·084); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) and light chain isotype for OS (HR 2·22, P < 0·001; HR 1·62, P = 0·016) and haemEFS (HR 1·88, P < 0·001; HR 1·59, P = 0·008). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0·71, P = 0·004) and 24-h proteinuria (HR 1·10, P = 0·004) were prognostic for renal survival. In conclusion, clonal and organ biomarkers at baseline identify patients with favourable outcome, while VGHR and cardiac progression define prognosis during RD treatment.

Longitudinal Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis to evaluate tolerability: a case study of lenalidomide in the CALGB 50401 (Alliance) trial.

Evaluation of tolerability is increasingly relevant for patients with haematological malignancies treated with chronically administered therapies. Adverse events from these agents might affect the ability of patients to tolerate treatment over time. Conventional toxicity tables that include the incidence of high-grade adverse events, defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, do not provide information on the time profile of these adverse events or reflect the continuous, lower grade symptomatic toxicities that are particularly relevant to treatment tolerability for patients living with indolent disease. Modern approaches to the evaluation and reporting of toxicity that capture the tolerability of treatment to the patient are imperative. In this Viewpoint, we present a focused, pilot, and longitudinal Toxicity over Time analysis of adverse events from lenalidomide and lenalidomide with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma treated in the CALGB 50401 (Alliance; NCT00238238) trial to define the trajectory of adverse events and quantify the burden of continuous, low-grade events. Toxicity over Time analyses provided clinically relevant descriptions of neutropenia and fatigue trajectories caused by lenalidomide that were not identified by standard analysis of the maximum grade events defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Systematic, rigorous incorporation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials will be crucial to our understanding of the tolerability of chronically administered therapies in patients with haematological malignancies.

Influence of ABCB1 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma.

Individual diversity in plasma concentrations of lenalidomide occurs despite dosage modifications based on creatinine clearance (CCr), which can lead to unexpected toxicity. We have previously identified a cutoff value of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) for lenalidomide to avoid severe toxicity. Here, we investigated the association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Plasma concentrations of lenalidomide were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Genotyping for ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>A/T, and 3435C>T polymorphisms was performed, and the effects of ABCB1 polymorphisms on AUC0-24 for lenalidomide were compared in 36 patients with MM who were administered lenalidomide according to the drug label based on CCr. Genotyping analysis showed that although there were no differences in AUC0-24 in 1236C>T and 2677G>A/T polymorphisms. AUC0-24 was significantly higher in patients with the T allele of 3435C>T (n = 15) than in those without (n = 21) (median 6324.6 ng h/mL vs. 2857.4 ng h/mL, p = 0.028). The AUC0-24 value exceeded the aforementioned cutoff value in 95% of the patients with the T allele of 3435C>T but in 60% with C/C genotype (p = 0.013). Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed the significance of T allele of ABCB1 3435C>T as a factor due to which the AUC0-24 cutoff value was exceeded (hazard ratio of 15.0, p = 0.019). We show that lenalidomide pharmacokinetics is influenced by the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism, which could be useful to individualize dosage design and reduce unexpected toxicity.

Impact of lenalidomide use among non-transfusion dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Chemotherapies approved for defined subgroups promise personalized oncologic care, but their off-label impact is unclear. Lenalidomide is approved for lower-risk, transfusion-dependent (TD) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del(5q), but frequently used in MDS outside this indication. We characterized lenalidomide use and outcomes among non-TD patients with MDS. Patients 65 or older diagnosed with MDS between 2007 and 2013 were identified using SEER; linked Medicare claims were evaluated for transfusions, lenalidomide use, and incident toxicities. TD was ≥2 transfusion episodes within an 8-week period; responses were transfusion independence (TI) and ≥50% transfusion reduction (minor response). We compared overall survival for non-TD patients receiving lenalidomide versus those not receiving lenalidomide, matched on disease and patient characteristics. We identified 676 patients who had received lenalidomide, including 275 (40.7%) TD and 401 (59.3%) non-TD; 18.5% (125/676) had zero claims for RBC transfusion prior to receiving lenalidomide. Incident toxicities among patients prescribed lenalidomide were similar in TD and non-TD groups, except incident thromboembolic events were higher among non-TD patients (10.8% vs. 6.0%, P = .04). Comparing 191 non-TD patients receiving lenalidomide within 6 months of MDS diagnosis to risk-matched MDS controls, lenalidomide was not associated with improved OS (P = .78). Among TD patients (n = 275), 31% achieved TI, and 30% achieved minor hematologic response, with a median time to TI of 4.1 weeks. In conclusion, we confirmed the benefit of lenalidomide among TD patients with MDS; however, many non-TD patients also received lenalidomide. These patients experienced accompanying toxicity without evidence of benefit in terms of transfusion needs or overall survival.