Trauma severity predictors / Preditores de gravidade no trauma

This review aimed to determine which are the indexes for early detection and evaluation of clinical and physiological deterioration of traumatized patients. A Scoping Review according to the methods proposed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was performed from February 2018 to December 2018 on LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), and SCOPUS databases. Sixty-two studies were included, of which 43 evaluated patients with general trauma. A variety of physiological variables, such as Glasgow Coma Score, Glucose, Days in the Intensive Care Unit, Lactate, and predictor indexes - Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Revisited Trauma Score (RTS), and APACHE II were identified. The values observed in the studies among patients were compared to the ones determined by the basic literature, being called Critical Values (CV). The group of gravity indexes, besides clinical and regulatory protocols, found in this review are the solidification of the healthcare process involving the traumatized patient's responses to the actions of the healthcare team. The analysis of these indexes must be emphasized to determine, with greater reliability, the prognosis of the patient. With these data, it may be possible to effectively predict mortality rates (AU).

O objetivo desta revisão é determinar os índices para detecção precoce e avaliação clínica e fisiológica para deterioração de pacientes do trauma. Conduziu-se uma revisão de escopo de acordo com os métodos propostos pelo Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) entre fevereiro de 2018 a dezembro de 2018 nas bases de dados LILACS (Literatura Latina-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e SCOPUS. Foram incluídos 62 estudos, dos quais 43 sobre trauma geral. Encontrou-se grande diversidade de variáveis fisiológicas, como Escala de Coma de Glasgow, Glicose, dias em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, lactato e índices preditores­Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Reviseted Trauma Score (RTS) e APACHE II. Os valores observados nos pacientes dos estudos encontrados foram comparados com os da literatura básica, sendo denominados Valores Críticos (CV). O grupo de índices de gravidade encontrados neste estudo, além de protocolos reguladores e clínicos, são a solidificação do processo de cuidado envolvendo a resposta das ações da equipe em saúde ao paciente de trauma. A análise desses índices deve ser enfatizada para determinar com maior confiabilidade o prognóstico do paciente. Com esses dados, pode ser possível predizer a taxa de mortalidade com maior acurácia (AU).

Dual spinal cord injury: a case of acute traumatic T9 AIS A spinal cord injury complicated by transverse myelitis.

INTRODUCTION: While the general principles of treatment of TM are agreed upon, the rarity of the disease has made determining its clinical course and etiology quite difficult. This report aims to inform these debates by demonstrating the susceptibility of at least one individual to transverse myelitis following an acute SCI. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report follows the clinical course of a 17 year old. Caucasian female that contracted transverse myelitis (TM) following an acute traumatic spinal cord injury. This patient originally presented as a T9 AIS A traumatic SCI, and was then re-graded as C6 AIS A SCI following diagnosis of TM. She was later seen in clinic for 6-month follow-up and displayed post-trauma baseline scores for both strength and sensation, indicating nearly complete recovery. DISCUSSION: In addition, this report demonstrates the importance of adequate clinical management of TM in practical terms of patient performance on clinical exams. This report also adds to the existing body of evidence suggesting early intervention is associated with better functional outcomes.

Inflicted versus unintentional injury: towards improved detection and surveillance of supervisory neglect.

BACKGROUND: Many children evaluated for child abuse have non-inflicted injuries due to supervisory neglect. Despite its prevalence, supervisory neglect has received minimal attention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients maintained in a hospital forensic registry. Text analytics software was used to classify types of supervisory neglect from reported mechanism of injury (MOI). Logistic regression was used to assess risks associated with supervisory neglect. RESULTS: For 1185 eligible patients, 553 were classified as having unintentional injuries. Text analysis identified four types of supervisory neglect for falls (N = 376): interrupted supervision (53.4%); failure to adapt the home (26.7%); safety equipment non-compliance (12.8%); inadequate substitute care (7.0%); a fifth category was identified for non-falls (N = 54): rough handling (32.0%). Supervisory neglect was associated with MOI consistent with the injury (AOR = 15.5[p < 0.001]), no loss of consciousness (AOR = 6.8(p < 0.001]), no bruising away from the injury site (AOR = 3.7[p < 0.001]), and direct hospital presentation (AOR = 1.8[p < 0.05]). Of the 553 with unintentional injury, 62% had isolated head injuries; 20%, however, had evidence of prior head trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Interrupted supervision was the most common form of supervisory neglect. Twenty percent of forensics patients with head injury found to have non-inflicted injuries had evidence of prior head injury. Supervisory neglect suggests a high-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognosis.

Age-related mortality in abusive head trauma.

BACKGROUND: Abusive head trauma (AHT) peaks during early infancy and decreases in toddler years. Infants and toddlers experience different injuries, possibly impacting the risk of mortality. We aimed to evaluate the association of age with mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of AHT hospitalizations in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 from the Kid's Inpatient Claims Database. An accidental head trauma cohort was included to hypothesize that the association between age and mortality is unique to abuse. A nested multivariable logistic regression was used to perform the analysis. RESULTS: Children aged 2 years to 4 years experienced higher mortality than those younger than 2 years (22% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2). The presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), cerebral edema (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.9-5.4), and retinal hemorrhage (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5) were associated with an increase risk in mortality. Children younger than 2 years experienced more fractures and hemorrhage (subdural, subarachnoid, retinal) while children aged 2 years to 4 years encountered more internal injuries and cerebral edema.In children with accidental head trauma, those aged 2 years to 4 years have a lower mortality compared with those younger than 2 years (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.6). Among children younger than 2 years, AHT and accidental trauma had comparable risk of mortality (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.3). However, among those aged 22 years to 4 years, AHT had a higher risk of mortality than accidental trauma (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.1-5.1). CONCLUSION: There is a considerable risk of mortality associated with age at diagnosis in children with AHT.Children younger than 2 years and those aged 2 years to 4 years present with different types of injuries. The high risk of mortality in the children aged 2 years to 4 years is unique to AHT. Efforts should be made to increase awareness about the risk of mortality and identify factors that can aide in a timely accurate diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III.