Meniscal extrusion consensus statement: A collaborative survey within the Meniscus International Network (MenIN) Study Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to perform a survey administered to members of the Meniscus International Network (MenIN) Study Group, seeking to delineate the most contentious aspects of meniscal extrusion classification and provide a foundation for new, more comprehensive definitions and treatments for these pathologies. METHODS: MenIN Study Group is a group of international experts treating and performing research on meniscus pathology and treatment. All MenIN Study Group members were asked to complete a survey aimed at establishing criteria for the optimal classification system for meniscal extrusion. Data obtained from the completed questionnaires were transferred into a spreadsheet and then analysed. All responses are presented as counts, percentages or means. RESULTS: Forty-seven (85.5%) MenIN Study Group members completed the survey and were included in this analysis. Key aspects recommended for inclusion in a comprehensive classification system for meniscal extrusion included laterality (93.6%), anatomical location (76.6%), patient age (76.6%), body mass index (BMI) (68.1%) and aetiology (68.1%). For classifying meniscal extrusion, 53.2% considered the distance in millimetres from the tibial plateau's outer margin as the most reliable measurement technique on imaging. Preferences for imaging modalities varied, with 44.7% favouring weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 36.2% opting for weight-bearing ultrasound due to its greater availability. Respondents advocated for a classification system addressing stability or progression of meniscal extrusion (66%), reducibility (53.2%), potential progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) (83%), influencing treatment approaches (83%), a gradation system (83%), consideration of dynamic factors (66%), association with clinical outcomes and prognosis (76.6%) and investigation around centralization procedures (57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings of this survey shed light on the global perspectives regarding meniscal extrusion classification. It was generally felt that a new classification of extrusion measured on MRI scans at the mid-tibial plateau should be developed, which considers factors such as laterality, anatomical location, age, BMI and aetiology. Additionally, the results support the integration of dynamic factors and clinical outcomes in MRI-based classifications to inform treatment approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Diagnostic impacts on management of soft tissue injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures: A narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no consensus on the need for investigating knee ligamentous and meniscal injuries in a patient with a tibial plateau fracture. Consequently, many soft tissue injuries are likely undiagnosed and therefore untreated. The impact this has on long term knee outcomes is not well defined. We aimed to identify the impacts of various diagnostic methods on the management of meniscal injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures and evaluate the clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane following Cochrane guidelines. We included studies that operatively managed tibial plateau fractures and soft tissue injuries, which were diagnosed with either preoperative MRI, intra-operative arthroscopy or arthrotomy. RESULTS: 18 articles with 884 people, with a mean age of 46.4 years were included. Soft tissue injuries were detected on MRI (32-73%) and arthroscopy (12-70%), of which the most common were lateral meniscal injuries (7-64% of tibial plateau fractures). When identified by arthroscopy and arthrotomy, these injuries were almost always treated, either by repair or debridement. The clinical outcomes of these patients were poorly reported, with a heterogenous use of patient reported outcome measures, and follow up time points. There were no randomised trials or control groups for comparative analysis, however operative treatment yielded good to excellent outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of concomitant soft tissue injuries with tibial plateau fractures, particularly lateral meniscal injuries. There are 2 main approaches to meniscal injuries: surgeons who don't investigate, don't treat, whilst surgeons who do investigate often do surgically treat. Although studies that treated these injuries achieved good to excellent results, the currently available evidence doesn't confirm treatment superiority. As there is plausibility for better outcomes, randomised studies are needed to further investigate this clinical question.

Quantitative evaluation of meniscus injury using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can diagnose meniscal lesions anatomically, while quantitative MRI can reflect the changes of meniscal histology and biochemical structure. Our study aims to explore the association between the measurement values obtained from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) and Stoller grades. Additionally, we aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SyMRI in determining the extent of meniscus injury. This potential accuracy could contribute to minimizing unnecessary invasive examinations and providing guidance for clinical treatment. METHODS: Total of 60 (n=60) patients requiring knee arthroscopic surgery and 20 (n=20) healthy subjects were collected from July 2022 to November 2022. All subjects underwent conventional MRI and SyMRI. Manual measurements of the T1, T2 and proton density (PD) values were conducted for both normal menisci and the most severely affected position of injured menisci. These measurements corresponded to the Stoller grade of meniscus injuries observed in the conventional MRI. All patients and healthy subjects were divided into normal group, degeneration group and torn group according to the Stoller grade on conventional MRI. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to compare the T1, T2 and PD values of the meniscus among 3 groups. The accuracy of SyMRI in diagnosing meniscus injury was assessed by comparing the findings with arthroscopic observations. The diagnostic efficiency of meniscus degeneration and tear between conventional MRI and SyMRI were analyzed using McNemar test. Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was utilized for evaluation. RESULTS: According to the measurements of SyMRI, there was no statistical difference of T1 value or PD value measured by SyMRI among the normal group, degeneration group and torn group, while the difference of T2 value was statistically significant among 3 groups (P=0.001). The arthroscopic findings showed that 11 patients were meniscal degeneration and 49 patients were meniscal tears. The arthroscopic findings were used as the gold standard, and the difference of T1 and PD values among the 3 groups was not statistically significant, while the difference of T2 values (32.81±2.51 of normal group, 44.85±3.98 of degeneration group and 54.42±3.82 of torn group) was statistically significant (P=0.001). When the threshold of T2 value was 51.67 (ms), the maximum Yoden index was 0.787 and the AUC value was 0.934. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement values derived from SyMRI could reflect the Stoller grade, illustrating that SyMRI has good consistency with conventional MRI. Moreover, the notable consistency observed between SyMRI and arthroscopy suggests a potential role for SyMRI in guiding clinical diagnoses.

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Identification of Meniscal Ramp Lesions in ACL-Deficient Knees: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous efforts to delineate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions, there is still a great deal of uncertainty regarding its diagnostic performance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase and included all articles, published before October 20, 2022, comparing the accuracy of MRI with that of arthroscopy as the gold standard for diagnosis of ramp lesions. We performed statistical analysis using Stata and Meta-DiSc software. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. RESULTS: This meta-analysis evaluated 21 diagnostic performance comparisons from 19 original research articles (2,149 patients). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnosing a ramp lesion were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.66 to 0.73), 0.88 (95% Cl, 0.86 to 0.89), 6.49 (95% Cl, 4.12 to 10.24), 0.36 (95% Cl, 0.28 to 0.46), 24.33 (95% Cl, 12.81 to 46.19), and 0.88, respectively. Meta-regression using different variables yielded the same results. CONCLUSIONS: MRI exhibited a DOR of 24.33 and moderate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing ramp lesions in ACL-deficient knees. However, arthroscopy using a standard anterolateral portal with intercondylar viewing is recommended to confirm a diagnosis of a ramp lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical Management of a Torn ACL and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear in the Pregnant Patient: A Case Report.

CASE: A 36-year-old, 7-month pregnant woman presented to the office with a locked knee and a displaced bucket-handle medial meniscus tear, in the setting of chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. After thorough discussion with the patient and her husband, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist, the patient was treated with left knee ACL reconstruction and medial meniscus repair. CONCLUSION: With sufficient preoperative planning and coordinated multidisciplinary care among orthopaedic, anesthesiologist, and obstetric specialists, elective knee surgery can be performed safely in time-sensitive situations during pregnancy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Indirect Signs for Anterior Instability of the Lateral Meniscus in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Anterior instability (AI) of the LM is potentially debilitating in young patients. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose AI is limited due to the lack of reliable and accurate MRI findings. The ability to identify AI preoperatively would potentially improve the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. This study presents a novel MRI finding ("phantom sign") for the detection of AI of the LM and demonstrates its reliability and accuracy. METHODS: Three independent blinded reviewers performed retrospective review of preoperative MRI for all patients who underwent LM repair between July 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, at a single center. Positive phantom sign was defined as abnormal signal intensity on MRI of the anterior horn of the LM on the coronal sequence at the anterior tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Preoperative MRI was also evaluated for other signs of LM anterior instability. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was assessed for rater scoring of presence of pathology on MRI. Predictive ability of each imaging finding with at least good (ICC 0.6 or above) reliability was also evaluated based on documented intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Fifty-five preoperative MRIs of arthroscopically treated LM tears were reviewed. Median age was 15 years (range 6 to 20), and 21 patients (38.2%) were female. Twenty-seven patients (49.1%) had a discoid meniscus. LM AI was present on arthroscopy for 25 knees (45.45%), and among these, 21 had discoid morphology. Interrater reliability was substantial for phantom sign (ICC 0.71, 97.5% CI: 0.55-0.82), posterior displacement (ICC 0.71, 97.5% CI: 0.55-0.82), and posterior "megahorn" (ICC 0.76, 97.5% CI: 0.62-0.85). On predictive analysis, phantom signs were 98% sensitive and 76.7% specific for LM AI. Posterior displacement and posterior megahorn were specific for AI (both 93.34%), though with limited sensitivity (32% and 28.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Phantom sign is a reliable and sensitive MRI finding for anterior instability, even in the absence of frank displacement on preoperative MRI. A positive finding should prompt a thorough arthroscopic evaluation of the anterior horn of the LM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-case control study.

The relevance of knee arthroscopy photographs in medicolegal proceedings.

PURPOSE: Whether photographs included in the operative report of knee arthroscopies can make the surgeon liable in the event of a legal investigation remains unknown. The main objective of this study was to establish inter-observer reliability in determining the presence or absence of lesions of the cartilage, meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Secondary objective was to assess the inter-observer reliability in classifying lesions. METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a continuous serie of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy from the same operator. The photographs of each patient's operative report were presented separately to three experts, blinded to each other. Each expert had to decide on the presence or absence of injuries to the following structures: meniscal, cartilage and ACL and then, classify it. Primary and secondary endpoints were evaluated using the Fleiss' kappa index. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability for lesion detection was between 0.4 and 0.61 for all structures with three exceptions: for cartilage, it was low (0.15) at the lateral tibial plateau and poor (-0.01) at the external condyle. On the contrary, the concordance was almost perfect (0.8) for the ACL. For classifying cartilaginous and meniscal lesions, inter-observer reliability was poor (from 0.03 to 0.14), except for at the lateral meniscus (0.65). CONCLUSION: Inter-observer reliability of arthroscopic knee diagnoses is poor when photographs alone are used. In the event of a legal investigation following knee arthroscopy, the photographs included in the operative report should not be used alone to hold the surgeon liable.

Signal intensity of repaired posterior roots after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears in stable knees: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluations at 3 years postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have assessed signal intensity after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears (MMPRTs) based on mid-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the quantitative signal intensity of repaired posterior roots over time, up to 3 years postoperatively, and the related factors. METHODS: This study included 36 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and MRI examinations using the same MRI system. The signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots was quantitatively evaluated using the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ). Medial meniscus extrusion (MME), the SNQ for MMPR, and clinical scores were assessed over 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: MME progressed over time until 3 years postoperatively, and its progression during this period was 1.61 ± 1.44 mm. The SNQ for MMPR decreased over time until 3 years postoperatively, and the change in the SNQ from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively (ΔSNQ) was 2.69 ± 1.69. All clinical scores significantly improved (p < 0.001). ΔSNQ was significantly correlated with body weight (correlation coefficient = -0.424, p = 0.010) and body mass index (correlation coefficient = -0.330, p = 0.050). However, ΔSNQ was not significantly correlated with preoperative or postoperative clinical scores. CONCLUSION: After pullout repair for MMPRTs, MME progressed to 3 years postoperatively. However, the signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots decreased, and clinical scores improved over time until 3 years postoperatively. Patient weight and body mass index were significantly correlated with the reduced signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots, suggesting that weight assessment in patients with MMPRTs is crucial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Meniscus root tears: state of the art.

BACKGROUND: Meniscus root tears represent significant pathology that, historically, has been underdiagnosed and undertreated. However, the recognition of their clinical and functional significance has recently surged, mainly due to their frequent association with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. AIM: This comprehensive review discusses various aspects of meniscal root tears, including their epidemiology, biomechanics, etiology, clinical and radiological findings, classification, management and surgical techniques.

Arthroscopic Linear Chain Fixation for the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Case Study.

BACKGROUND: The repair and reconstruction of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is an important issue in the field of orthopedic sports medicine. This study reports the first application of arthroscopic linear chain fixation for the treatment of MMPRTs. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old female patient presented with a 1.5-month history of right knee pain accompanied by a locked facet joint. The patient underwent surgery with the new linear chain fixation method. In this method, the suture and the loop part of the buckle-strap titanium plate were combined into a linear chain mechanical complex, and the tension of the posterior root stump was gradually increased by pulling on the two attachment lines at the external mouth of the tibial tunnel. The postoperative Lysholm score was 89, and the visual analogue scale score was 0.9, indicating a significant improvement in knee joint function. At the 7-month and 1-year post-surgery follow-up, physical and MRI examinations confirmed satisfactory healing of the MMPRTs. CONCLUSION: This surgical approach offers several benefits, including a simplified instrumentation setup, preservation of natural anatomical structures, and reliable residual stump fixation. It has the potential for clinical implementation.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Knee Meniscus Tear and ACL Injury.

Objective: Knee injuries are very common and may lead to other secondary injuries if effective treatment is lacking. In addition to standardized physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sometimes considered an aid in the diagnosis of knee trauma. In order to have a more accurate diagnosis of knee injuries, we compared MRI with arthroscopic findings in this study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. Methods: One hundred and ten patients with suspected meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee who were admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 were selected as study subjects, and the clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent MRI for preoperative diagnosis, and the sensitivity, specificity, MRI findings, and confirmation of diagnosis were compared and analyzed, and the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL injuries of the knee was analyzed. Results: The mean ACL angle was (98.0 ± 5.4) in the MRI group and (118.0 ± 6.8) in the arthroscopic group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant P < .05. The mean L/H value of the ACL was (2.12 ± 0.38) in the MRI group and (1.81 ± 0.19) in the arthroscopic group, which was statistically different between the two groups (P < .05). Among the patients, 68 meniscal injuries were found in the MRI examination, including 45 cases of knee meniscal tears and 23 cases of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, agreement rate, kappa value, and Youden index of MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL injuries were all high. Conclusions: In terms of sensitivity and accuracy, MRI is an excellent imaging technique for the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee.

"Ring-shaped" meniscus and accompanying intermeniscal bridge meniscus: a rare combined variant resembling a bucket-handle tear.

Many anatomical variations have been described in the menisci, especially in the lateral meniscus. Among these, discoid meniscus is the most common variation. Others are described in the literature as double-layered meniscus, accessory meniscus, ring-shaped meniscus, and hypoplastic meniscus. Also, combined variations associated with ring-shaped meniscus have been described, and they can be confused with fragmented complex tears and cause unnecessary surgery. Increasing awareness of the imaging features of these accompanying combined variations may aid in the recognition and differentiation of this entity from meniscus tears. We report the case of a ring-shaped meniscus and accompanying intermeniscal bridge meniscus, which has not been described before in the literature, highlighting the MRI and arthroscopic imaging findings of it.

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tear in early knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to detect medial meniscal posterior root tear (MMPRT) diagnostic methods with high sensitivity and specificity using dynamic ultrasonographic evaluation in patients with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) and demonstrate the usefulness of dynamic ultrasonographic medial meniscal extrusion (MME) evaluation in MMPRT diagnosis using a cutoff value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, a total of 120 patients were diagnosed with early knee OA using clinical and radiographic findings. Dynamic ultrasonographic evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in all patients, and 47 patients who had and 73 patients who did not have MMPRT were classified into the MMPRT and non-MMPRT groups, respectively. Age, sex, femorotibial angle, MME of knee extension and flexion, and MME at weight-bearing were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of significant ultrasonographic findings were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The MMEs under knee extension-flexion and weight-loading in the MMPRT group were significantly larger than those in the non-MMPRT group. ROC curve analysis for each ultrasonographic evaluation condition to diagnose MMPRT indicated that the sensitivity was 72-88% and the specificity was 66-85% when the cutoff values of MME under knee flexion at 0°, 90°, and weight-loading were set at 2.55 mm, 2.00 mm, and 3.55 mm, respectively. The highest sensitivity (88%) and specificity (85%) were exhibited upon > 2 mm MME at a knee flexion of 90° and were the most useful indicators for MME diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic MME evaluations for MMPRT diagnosis showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity in patients with early knee OA. Dynamic ultrasonographic MME evaluation may lead to appropriate additional examinations, early diagnosis, and intervention for MMPRT in patients with early knee OA.

Magnetic resonance imaging shows low sensitivity but good specificity in detecting ramp lesions in children and adolescents with ACL injury: A systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: The diagnosis of ramp lesions can be problematic, even with arthroscopy, due to their extreme posteromedial position. Consequently, they have been colloquially referred to as the "hidden lesions" of the knee. Undiagnosed and untreated injuries in this knee region may be associated with ongoing dynamic rotational laxity of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. AIM: This study aimed to systematically review the literature to assess the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting ramp lesions in children and adolescents with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. It was hypothesized that MRI has poor sensitivity for identifying ramp lesions in children and adolescents. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following search terms were used in the title, abstract and keywords fields: "ramp" or "meniscus" AND "children" or "adolescents." The outcome data extracted from the studies were incidence of ramp in concomitant with ACL lesion, MRI sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). FINDINGS: Of the 387 patients with ACL injury, 90 were reported to have ramp lesions (23.3%). The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 15.3 â€‹± â€‹0.81 years. The mean time from injury to MRI was 116.1 â€‹± â€‹113.5 days, while the mean time from injury to surgery was 172.6 â€‹± â€‹139.1 days. The MRI taken to detect ramp lesions in the paediatric population showed a pooled sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 70%, PPV of 41% and NPV of 79%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of ACL-associated ramp lesions in children and adolescents is similar to that in adult populations. Magnetic resonance imaging has low sensitivity but good specificity for assessing ramp lesions. In the presence of a posteromedial tibial bone bruise or a thin fluid signal separating the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the posteromedial capsule a ramp lesion should always be suspected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO -: CRD42023453895.

Combined Medial And Lateral Bucket Handle Meniscus Tears With Associated Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: A Case Report.

The majority of meniscal tears in bucket handles are associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) impairment. Its a rare condition which is rarely encountered when the meniscus has a bucket handle on both sides of the compartment. Here we present the case of a 28-year- old male cricket player with a total ACL rupture, a double Posterior Cruciate ligament (PCL) sign on MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), an uncommon occurrence of a complex bucket handle rupture of the medial meniscus with a double PCL sign. It was a complete ACL tear and displaced bucket handle medial meniscus that was also visible on the magnetic resonance imaging. In this report, double PCL sign was shown on MRI and that was confirmed during the arthroscopic procedure.

Posterolateral tibial plateau bone bruises in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and its association with lateral meniscal injuries.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the prevalence of posterolateral tibial bone bruising in isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, prevalence of meniscal injuries in ACL injuries, as well as the association between posterolateral tibial bone bruising and lateral meniscal tears among those with ACL injury undergoing Primary ACL Reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data on 130 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstructions was analysed. Their preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI) were reviewed for the presence of posterolateral tibial bone bruise. The presence of meniscal injuries was recorded based on the arthroscopic findings from the operative records. RESULTS: 95 patients were recruited into the study. The prevalence of posterolateral bone bruise in this study was 41%. There was a statistically significant difference when comparing the prevalence of bone bruising to the time of injury to MRI (p<0.001). The prevalence of an injury to at least one meniscus at the time of ACLR surgery was 83.2%. The prevalence of lateral meniscus injuries in patients with bone bruise was found to be 53.9%. The crude odds ratio of a patient having a lateral meniscal tear in the presence of bone bruising was 1.56 (0.68, 3.54). This figure was even higher when it was adjusted for time to MRI and was 2.06 (0.77, 5.46). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of posterolateral tibial bone bruising in our study was 41%, and the prevalence of meniscal injury to either meniscus at the point of surgery was 83.2%, out of which the lateral meniscus tears were identified during ACLR surgery in 47.3% of the patients. We found there was no association between posterolateral tibial bone bruising to sex, age and mode of injury, but was sensitive to the interval between time of injury and MRI. The overall prevalence of lateral meniscal tears was higher in patients with posterolateral bone bruising but was not statistically significant with a P value of 0.31; however, the Crude odd ratio was 1.56 (0.68, 3.54) and was higher when adjusted to time of injury to MRI 2.06 (0.77, 5.46). We suggest for MRI to be done as soon as possible after injury in regard to bone bruising identification. We should be vigilant to look for lateral meniscal tears and anticipate for its repair in ACL injuries, especially so when we identify posterolateral tibial bruising on the preoperative MRI.

Medial meniscal posterior horn tears and ramp lesions in pediatric patients: lessons learned.

Meniscal injuries are increasingly reported in pediatric patients due to early sports participation and are commonly encountered during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Preoperative identification of meniscal tears is crucial, particularly when involving the posteromedial meniscocapsular junction (ramp lesion). MRI plays an important role in detecting this particular type of meniscal injury. Consequently, pediatric radiologists should be aware of particular MRI findings related to ramp lesions including the presence of a medial meniscal tear, peripheral meniscal irregularity, meniscocapsular junctional fluid-like signal intensity, and capsular ligament tears. Thus, we illustrate the lessons we have learned from our institutional multidisciplinary arthroscopic-MR correlation conference for retrospectively identified posterior horn medial meniscal tears and ramp lesions.

The meniscal extrusion index is a reliable indirect sign of different meniscal lesion patterns: a classification based on percentage of meniscal extrusion.

PURPOSE: This study's goal is to propose a straightforward classification system based on the MEI (Meniscal Extrusion Index), a measure of meniscal extrusion, that relates to various meniscal lesion patterns and has clinical and biomechanical significance. The study's secondary goal is to determine whether the standard 3 mm meniscal extrusion parameter still has value by correlating the MEI with it. METHODS: 1350 knee MRIs that were performed over the course of 2 years made up the study cohort. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 200 of those patients were qualified to participate in the study. All the measurements examined for this study underwent an interobserver reliability test. RESULTS: In the 1350 MRIs that were examined for this study, meniscal extrusion of any grade was present 18.9% of the time. The use of the MEI revealed three groups of patients: those with a MEI < 20%, who are likely para-physiological; those with a MEY between 20% and 40%, who are in a grey area; and those with a MEY > 40%, who have lesions that are impairing the proper meniscal function. According to the authors' findings, the percentage of meniscal extrusion did not correlate with the finite number (3 mm), making the 3 mm parameter an unreliable evaluation method. CONCLUSIONS: This study is clinically relevant, because it proposes a simple and reproducible classification of meniscal extrusion that may aid in evaluating the severity of an extrusion and help in the diagnosis of lesions that might be difficult to identify on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Symptomatic bilateral complete discoid medial menisci of the knee in a child: A case report.

Bilateral complete discoid medial menisci are extremely rare congenital anatomic variants of the knee. Currently, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with or without peripheral suture repair is performed for symptomatic discoid meniscus. However, most of the outcomes are short-term. In this article, we present a pediatric case of symptomatic bilateral complete discoid medial menisci and highlight the effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with or without peripheral suture on symptomatic complete discoid medial menisci based on 60-month excellent clinical and functional results.

Reprint of: Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent an all-inside repair (with a bony trough) versus transtibial pull-out repair in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent MMPRT repairs in nonacute tears in age over 40 from November 2015 to June 2019. All patients were divided into a transtibial pull-out repair group and an all-inside repair group. Different surgical techniques were used during different time frames. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The data collected included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at the 1-year follow-up to assess meniscus extrusion, signal intensity, and healing. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 28 patients in the all-inside repair group and 16 in the transtibial pull-out repair group. In the all-inside repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improved significantly at the 2-year follow-up. In the transtibial pull-out repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores did not improve significantly at the 2-year follow-up. Postoperative extrusion ratio increased in both groups, and patient-reported outcomes at follow-up did not differ between the two groups The change in the extrusion ratio was significantly less in the all-inside repair group (P = .009), as was the postoperative meniscus signal (P = .011). Postoperative MRI revealed significantly better healing in the all-inside group (P = .041). CONCLUSION: All-inside repair improved the functional outcome scores. Radiologically, all-inside repair was better than transtibial pull-out repair. All-inside repair may be a viable MMPRT treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.