The bone attachments of the medial collateral and posterior oblique ligaments are defined anatomically and radiographically.

PURPOSE: To define the bony attachments of the medial ligaments relative to anatomical and radiographic bony landmarks, providing information for medial collateral ligament (MCL) surgery. METHOD: The femoral and tibial attachments of the superficial MCL (sMCL), deep MCL (dMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL), plus the medial epicondyle (ME) were defined by radiopaque staples in 22 knees. These were measured radiographically and optically; the precision was calculated and data normalised to the sizes of the condyles. Femoral locations were referenced to the ME and to Blumensaat's line and the posterior cortex. RESULTS: The femoral sMCL attachment enveloped the ME, centred 1 mm proximal to it, at 37 ± 2 mm (normalised at 53 ± 2%) posterior to the most-anterior condyle border. The femoral dMCL attachment was 6 mm (8%) distal and 5 mm (7%) posterior to the ME. The femoral POL attachment was 4 mm (5%) proximal and 11 mm (15%) posterior to the ME. The tibial sMCL attachment spread from 42 to 71 mm (81-137% of A-P plateau width) below the tibial plateau. The dMCL fanned out anterodistally to a wide tibial attachment 8 mm below the plateau and between 17 and 39 mm (33-76%) A-P. The POL attached 5 mm below the plateau, posterior to the dMCL. The 95% CI intra-observer was ± 0.6 mm, inter-observer ± 1.3 mm for digitisation. The inter-observer ICC for radiographs was 0.922. CONCLUSION: The bone attachments of the medial knee ligaments are located in relation to knee dimensions and osseous landmarks. These data facilitate repairs and reconstructions that can restore physiological laxity and stability patterns across the arc of knee flexion.

The attachment sites and attachment areas of deltoid ligament related to clinical implications: a cadaveric study / Los sitios y las áreas de inserción del ligamento deltoideo relacionadas con las implicaciones clínicas: un estudio cadavérico

Currently, the treatment for patients with deltoid ligament injuries who require surgical treatment are anatomical repair and reconstruction. The clinicians should understand the exact knowledge of attachment areas of individual bands of deltoid ligament for a successful treatment. We studied 46 ankles of fresh frozen cadavers. The individual bands of deltoid ligament were divided to small fibers. Afterwards, each small fiber of each band was cut and marked with acrylic color on the origin and insertion followed by photo taking. Lastly, the photos of individual origin and insertion were used to calculate the attachment areas. We found six bands of deltoid ligament in all ankles except tibionavicular ligament. Moreover, we discovered deep to tibiocalcaneal and posterior to sustentaculum tali ligaments in 3 cases. Regarding the attachment area, the deep posterior tibiotalar ligament had the largest proximal and distal attachment areas which were 87.36±23.15 mm2 and 88.88±24.24 mm2, respectively. The anterior tibiotalar ligament had the least proximal and distal attachment areas which were 23.12±8.25 mm2 and 33.16±14.63 mm2, respectively. Hence, the accuracy and exact areas of attachment of deltoid ligament are important as it can help clinicians to select the suitable treatments including injury prevention.

Actualmente, el tratamiento para pacientes con lesiones del ligamento colateral medial de la articulación talocrural (ligamento deltoideo), que requieren tratamiento quirúrgico es la reparación y reconstrucción anatómica. Los médicos, para un tratamiento exitoso, deben conocer exactactamente las áreas de inserción de las partes de ligamento deltoideo. Estudiamos 46 tobillos de cadáveres congelados frescos. Las bandas individuales del ligamento deltoideo se dividieron en fibras pequeñas. Posteriormente, cada pequeña fibra de cada banda se cortó y marcó con color acrílico en el origen y la inserción, seguido de la toma de fotografías. Por último, las fotos de origen e inserción individuales se utilizaron para calcular las áreas. Encontramos seis bandas de ligamento deltoides en todos los tobillos, excepto el ligamento tibionavicular. Además, descubrimos en profundidad hasta los ligamentos tibiocalcaneaos y posteriores al sustentaculum tali en 3 casos. Con respecto al área de inserciónn, la parte tibiotalar posterior profundamente tenía las áreas de inserción proximal y distal más largas, que eran 87.36 ± 23.15 mm2 y 88.88 ± 24.24 mm2, respectivamente. La parte tibiotalar anterior del ligamento deltoideo tpresentaba áreas de unión menos proximales y distales 23.12 ± 8.25 mm2 y 33.16 ± 14.63 mm2, respectivamente. Por lo tanto, la precisión y las áreas exactas de inserción del ligamento deltoideo de la articulación talocrural son importantes, ya que pueden ayudar a los médicos a seleccionar los tratamientos adecuados, incluida la prevención de lesiones.

The Importance of Restoring Anatomy of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint in Dorsal Fracture Dislocations.

The proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) is a complex anatomical structure. In managing fracture dislocations about the PIPJ, the aim is to restore a congruent joint that allows for smooth gliding motion. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy and biomechanics of the PIPJ is necessary in managing these injuries with predictable success. The breadth of techniques previously described in the treatment of such injuries is testament to the difficulties faced in achieving optimal clinical and radiological outcomes. In this article we detail the anatomy and biomechanics of the PIPJ and summarize current literature and principles for the treatment of dorsal fracture dislocations.

Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Ulnar and Radial Collateral Ligament Injuries.

Thumb metacarpophalangeal collateral ligament injuries are common in athletes and occur via forced abduction or hyperextension. Management primarily depends on the grade of ligamentous injury and the presence of a Stener lesion or large avulsion fracture. Surgeons should consider the athlete's position, hand dominance, duration of season remaining, and goals. Shared decision making regarding timing of surgery is imperative. Acutely, primary ligamentous repair with or without augmentation is achievable. Chronic collateral ligament injuries are effectively treated with ligament reconstruction. Numerous surgical techniques have been described without 1 showing superiority. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols vary based on repair quality and sports-specific considerations.

Transverse ligament of the elbow joint: an anatomic study of cadavers.

BACKGROUND: The medial collateral ligament of the elbow joint consists of the anterior oblique ligament (AOL), posterior oblique ligament (POL), and transverse ligament (TL). This study aimed to clarify the structure of the TL, with a focus on the continuity between the TL and AOL. METHODS: A total of 42 cadavers (18 males, 24 females) were dissected at Aichi Medical University between 2016 and 2018. Cases of elbow deformity or atrophy were excluded, and 60 elbows (15 males, 15 females) were dissected to assess the fibers of both the TL and AOL using a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The TL could be detected in all elbows and always continued to the AOL. The TL was classified into 2 types. The TLs continuing to the distal half of the AOL (type I) were observed in 44 elbows (73.3%), whereas the TLs continuing to the entire AOL (type II) were found in 16 elbows (26.7%). Type II TLs were significantly more frequently observed in the elbows of females than in those of males (P = .041). Stereomicroscopic observation revealed that the TL fibers entered perpendicularly to the distal half of the AOL in both types. CONCLUSIONS: The TL frequently continues to the distal half of the AOL, but rarely continues to the entire AOL. The TLs continuing to the entire AOL were more frequently detected in the elbows of females than in those of males. The TL possibly contributes to medial elbow stability via its continuity to the AOL.

Computed Tomography Analysis for Quantification of Displacement of the Distal Fibula in Different Foot Positions With Weightbearing and Sequentially Increased Instability: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study on Syndesmosis.

Syndesmotic injuries are quite common, but accurate diagnosis and treatment can be difficult, in part because of individual anatomic variation and complex movements of the fibula in the incisura. The current cadaveric study was designed to investigate changes in the position of the fibula in the incisura during simulated weightbearing in different foot positions and with sequential sectioning of syndesmotic and deltoid ligaments. Sixteen paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric limbs were embedded in polymethylmethacrylate mid-calf and placed in a weightbearing simulation frame. Computed tomography scans were obtained while the legs were in a simulated foot-flat position (75 N) and single-leg stance (700 N) in 5 foot positions: neutral, 15° external rotation, 15° internal rotation, 20° dorsiflexion, and 20° plantar flexion. The anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament, posterior tibiofibular ligament complex, deltoid, and interosseous membranes were sectioned sequentially and rescanned. Measurements of fibular diastasis, rotation, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral translation, and fibular shortening were performed. The most destructive state resulted in the largest displacement at the syndesmosis. The degree of subluxation in all ligament states was dependent on the foot position. External rotation created statistically significant displacement at all levels of injury. There were no significant differences between sides of the same donor. Our data demonstrate the importance of foot position in reduction at the syndesmosis under weightbearing. The current ex vivo model could be used to evaluate other aspects of this injury or the value of reconstructive techniques in the future.

Fibular Collateral Ligament/ Posterolateral Corner Injury: When to Repair, Reconstruct, or Both.

The posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee was regarded as the "dark side" of the knee because of limited understanding of its anatomy and biomechanics and because of poor outcomes after injuries to PLC structures. These injuries rarely occur in isolation, with 28% reported as isolated PLC injuries. Nonoperative treatment of these injuries has led to persistent instability, development of early osteoarthritis, and poor outcomes. Several techniques for reconstruction of the PLC have been described, and all are reported to improve outcomes. Biomechanically validated anatomic reconstructions are preferred because they restore native knee kinematics and improve clinical outcomes without over-constraining the knee.

The lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow: quantitative anatomic analysis of the lateral ulnar collateral, radial collateral, and annular ligaments.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) complex of the elbow often results in posterolateral rotatory instability. Although surgical reconstruction of the LUCL is often required, gaps in our understanding of the LUCL complex remain. The purpose of this study was to provide a robust and accurate characterization of the lateral elbow ligamentous complex. METHODS: The LUCLs, radial collateral ligaments, and annular ligaments in 10 cadaveric elbows were 3-dimensionally digitized and reconstructed using computed tomography. Surface areas, origin and insertion footprint areas, distances between perceived footprint centers and geometric footprint centroids, distances to key landmarks, and ligament isometry were measured. RESULTS: The mean surface area of the LUCL was 229.3 mm2. The mean origin and insertion footprint areas were 26.0 mm2 and 22.9 mm2, respectively. The mean distance between the apparent centers and the geometric centroids of the footprints was 1 mm. The center of the LUCL origin was 10.7 mm distal to the lateral epicondyle and 8.2 mm from the capitellar articular margin. The center of the LUCL insertion was 3.3 mm distal to the apex of the supinator crest. The LUCL showed anisometric properties as elbow flexion increased (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The LUCL origin center was 10.7 mm from the lateral epicondyle, whereas the insertion center was 3.3 mm from the apex of the supinator crest. The visually estimated footprint centers were generally within 1 mm of the geometric centroid. These geometries and distances to key landmarks will be informative for surgeons seeking to perform anatomic ligament reconstruction procedures.

Insertional anatomy of the anterior medial collateral ligament on the sublime tubercle of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Acute injuries to the anterior medial collateral ligament (AMCL) can occur due to valgus trauma or during other dislocating events to the elbow. AMCL lesions are often associated with bony lesions, such as radial head fractures or fractures of the coronoid process. We analyzed the insertion of the AMCL on the sublime tubercle in relation to surrounding osseous structures. We aimed to increase the understanding of the involvement of the AMCL in bony lesions to the sublime tubercle. METHODS: We investigated 86 elbows from 43 embalmed human specimens. We measured the most ventral extensions of the AMCL at the sublime tubercle in relation to a clearly defined and reproducible landmark. We used as our landmark a horizontal line (baseline) originating on the lesser sigmoid notch in a right angle to the ulnar ridge. RESULTS: The mean distance of the coronoid process tip to the baseline was 4.0 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.3 mm; range, 1.4-6.7 mm). The mean distance of the ventral extension of the AMCL to the horizontal line was 3.7 mm (SD, 2.6 mm; range: 9.4-2.2 mm). The mean horizontal distance between the ventral aspect of the AMCL and the coronoid tip was 13.7 mm (SD, 2.5 mm; range, 7.7-20.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: We present a detailed description of the insertional anatomy of the AMCL at the sublime tubercle. These values could be helpful for classifications of coronoid fractures and to estimate the involvement of the AMCL in fractures of the sublime tubercle.

Anatomical Basis for Arthroscopy of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopy is a widely used minimally invasive technique. Nevertheless, no report describes the arthroscopic anatomy of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint for portal creation. To facilitate arthroscopy, this study elucidated the anatomy of the lateral bands of the extensor mechanism and collateral ligaments of PIP joints. METHODS: A total of 39 fingers from the right hands of 10 cadavers (4 males, 6 females) were evaluated in this study. We defined the extension line from the proximal interphalangeal volar crease as the C-line. We also defined an imaginary line along the distal edge of the proximal phalanx, which is parallel to the C-line, as the J-line. The distance between J-line and C-line was measured. On the C-line and J-line, we measured the following: from the dorsal skin to the lateral edge of the lateral band (LB), the dorsal edge of the collateral ligament (CL) and from the lateral band and the collateral ligament (D), the width of the finger (W). The finger half-width (M) was measured on the J-line. Comparison between the digits and comparison between radial and ulnar distance were measured and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: All PIP joint spaces were distal from the C-line, except for one ring finger. The average distances between the J-line and C-line were 1.8-3.2 mm. On the C-line, only 11 cases (14.1%) showed an interval between the lateral bands and the collateral ligaments, but, on the J-line 72, cases (92.3%) had such an interval. The interval was located 1.6-2.9 mm in a dorsal direction from the midlateral on the J-line. CONCLUSIONS: Portal creation at the J-line is safer than at the C-line. This study revealed that safe portals for arthroscopy of the PIP joint are 2 mm dorsal to the midlateral line of the finger on the J-line.

The annular ligament-revisited.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the annular ligament have presented confusing information about its anatomy and nomenclature. Cadaver elbow dissections were used to clarify the anatomy and terminology of the annular ligament. METHODS: Nineteen elbows were dissected (7 fresh frozen and 12 embalmed). Target structures were identified, photographed, and measured by independent observers. RESULTS: There are 3 layers to the lateral elbow ligaments: the superficial lateral ulnar collateral and radial collateral ligament; a deeper layer of the superior oblique band (SOB) and inferior oblique band (IOB) of the annular ligament; and the deepest capsular layer. The annular ligament measured 9.5 ± 1.4 mm anteriorly. The SOB (15/19) was 3.9 ± 1.0 mm wide by 10.5 ± 3.8 mm long. The IOB (13/19) was 3.6 ± 1.1 mm wide by 11.4 ± 4.2 mm long. The IOB inserts onto the anterior proximal ulna rather than the supinator crest. The anterior oblique band (8/19) was 3.8 ± 1.7 mm wide. CONCLUSION: The SOB and IOB were present in the majority of specimens. The previously described accessory lateral collateral ligament is a localized thickening on the lateral ligament complex arising from the supinator insertion independent of the IOB that attaches to the annular ligament inferiorly and distally and attaches onto the proximal anterior ulna at the bicipital fossa floor, medial to the supinator crest.

What to Do with the Spring Ligament.

The spring ligament complex is an important static restraint of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot and its failure has been associated with progressive flatfoot deformity. Reconstruction of the spring ligament complex is most appropriate in stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, before severe peritalar subluxation and rigid deformity develops. Although an understanding of the spring ligament complex and its contribution to medial arch stability has grown, there is no unanimously accepted surgical technique that has consistently demonstrated satisfactory outcomes. This article reviews the pathoanatomy of the spring ligament complex and the role of spring ligament reconstruction in acquired flatfoot deformity, and highlights current research.

Kinematics of Different Components of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee in the Lateral Collateral Ligament-intact State: A Human Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the static stabilizing effects of different anatomical structures of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee in the lateral collateral ligament (LCL)-intact state. METHODS: Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were dissected and tested using an industrial robot with an optical tracking system. Kinematics were determined for 134 N anterior/posterior loads, 10 N m valgus/varus loads, and 5 N m internal/external rotatory loads in 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The PLC structures were dissected and consecutively released: (I) intact knee joint, (II) with released posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), (III) popliteomeniscal fibers, (IV) popliteofibular ligament, (V) arcuat and popliteotibial fibers, (VI) popliteus tendon (PLT), and (VII) LCL. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: After releasing the PCL, posterior tibial translation increased by 5.2 mm at 20° to 9.4 mm at 90° of joint flexion (P < .0001). A mild 1.8° varus instability was measured in 0° of flexion (P = .0017). After releasing the PLC structures, posterior tibial translation further increased by 2.9 mm at 20° to 5.9 mm at 90° of flexion (P < .05) and external rotation angle increased by 2.6° at 0° to 7.9° at 90° of flexion (P < .05, vs II). Varus stability did not decrease. Mild differences between states V and VI were found in 60° and 90° external rotation tests (2.1° and 3.1°; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The connecting ligaments/fibers to the PLT act as a primary static stabilizer against external rotatory loads and a secondary stabilizer against posterior tibial loads (when PCL is injured). After releasing these structures, most static stabilizing function of the intact PLT is lost. The PLC has no varus-stabilizing function in the LCL-intact knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anatomy and function of these structures for primary and secondary joint stability should be considered for clinical diagnostics and when performing surgery in the PLC.

Morphological features of the popliteus tendon, popliteofibular and lateral (fibular) collateral ligaments / Características morfológicas del tendón del músculo poplíteo, y ligamentos popliteofibular y colateral fibular

To reveal the detailed morphological features of the fibular collateral (fibular) ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament and the synovial components regarding to achieve data for surgical and biomechanical utilization. Knees of 10 formalin-fixed male cadavers were dissected bilaterally. Bursae around the lateral collateral ligament and the relation of popliteus tendon with lateral collateral ligament at the femoral attachment site were noted. The positional relation between both ends of popliteofibular ligament was evaluated statistically. The PT exceeded the anterior margin of lateral collateral ligament in 11 sides, the posterior margin of lateral collateral ligament in 3 sides and exceeded both the anterior and posterior margins of lateral collateral ligament in 5 sides. The shape of lateral collateral ligament was narrower at the lower part than the upper in 14 sides. The width of lower part of lateral collateral ligament was found narrower in the cases with sheath-like bursa (vagina synovialis). The relation between both ends of popliteofibular ligament was as followed: the more anteriorly the fibular head attachment was located, the more anteriorly popliteofibular ligament was attached to the popliteus tendon. To resolve the posterolateral corner of the knee with regard to surgical anatomy and biomechanics, individual and concerted morphometric characteristics of lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon and PF should be evaluated together with accompanied synovial structures.

El objetivo de este trabajo consistió en descubrir las características morfológicas detalladas del ligamento colateral fibular, del tendón del músculo poplíteo (TMP), del ligamento popliteofibular y de los componentes sinoviales relacionados con la obtención de datos para la aplicación quirúrgica y biomecánica. Se disecaron bilateralmente rodillas de 10 cadáveres de sexo masculino fijados con formalina. Se identificó la bursa alrededor del ligamento colateral fibular y la relación del tendón del músculo poplíteo con el ligamento colateral fibular en el sitio de la inserción femoral. La relación posicional entre ambos extremos del ligamento popliteofibular se evaluó estadísticamente. El TMP excedió el margen anterior del ligamento colateral fibular en 11 casos, el margen posterior del ligamento colateral fibular en 3 casos y superó los márgenes anterior y posterior del ligamento colateral fibular en 5 casos. La forma del ligamento colateral fibular fue más estrecha en la porción inferior que en la porción superior en 14 casos. El ancho de la porción inferior del ligamento colateral fibular fue más estrecha en los casos con bursa del tipo vaina (vagina synovialis). La relación entre ambos extremos del ligamento popliteofibular fue la siguiente: cuanto más anteriormente se localizó la inserción de la cabeza fibular, más anteriormente el ligamento popliteofibular se unió al TMP. Para intervenir el ángulo posterolateral de la rodilla con respecto a la anatomía quirúrgica y la biomecánica, se deben evaluar las características morfométricas individuales y concertadas del ligamento colateral fibular, el TMP y el ligamento popliteofibular, junto con las estructuras sinoviales correspondientes.

Elbow Instability: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Diagnostic Maneuvers, and Testing.

The elbow comprises a complex of bony and ligamentous stabilizers that provide both primary and secondary constraints to elbow instability. Through trauma and overuse, classic instability patterns arise by loss of these important stabilizers. The diagnosis of elbow instability can made using specific examination maneuvers and testing to diagnose the clinical pattern. This article reviews the elbow's unique anatomy and biomechanical characteristics and these are applied when reviewing the maneuvers and testing used to diagnose elbow instability.

Functional anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the functional anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) and the surrounding forearm extensors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 81 human cadaveric upper extremities, the anatomy of the forearm extensors-especially the anconeus, supinator and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU)-was analyzed. After removal of aforementioned extensors the functional anatomy of the LCLC was analyzed. The origin of the LCLC was evaluated for isometry. The insertion types of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) were analyzed and classified. RESULTS: The ECU runs parallel to the RCL to dynamically preserve varus stability. The supinator and anconeus muscle fibers coalesce with the LCLC and lengthen during pronation. The anconeus fibers run parallel to the LUCL in full flexion. The LCLC consists of the annular ligament (AL) and the isometric radial collateral ligament (RCL). During elbow flexion, its posterior branches (LUCL) tighten while the anterior branches loosen. When performing a pivot shift test, the loosened LUCL fibers do not fully tighten in full extension. The LUCL inserts along with the AL at the supinator crest. Three different insertion types could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: The LUCL represents the posterior branch of the RCL rather than a distinct ligament. It is non-isometric and lengthens during elbow flexion. The RCL was found to be of vital importance for neutralization of posterolateral rotatory forces. Pronation of the forearm actively stabilizes the elbow joint as the supinator, anconeus and biceps muscle work in unison to increase posterolateral rotatory stability.

Editorial Commentary: Defining the Anatomy of the Anterolateral Aspect of the Knee Among Experts Is Clearly Needed.

The anterolateral ligament primarily attaches proximal and posterior to the femoral attachment of the fibular (lateral) collateral ligament.

Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay.

Understanding the anatomy of the ankle ligaments is important for correct diagnosis and treatment. Ankle ligament injury is the most frequent cause of acute ankle pain. Chronic ankle pain often finds its cause in laxity of one of the ankle ligaments. In this pictorial essay, the ligaments around the ankle are grouped, depending on their anatomic orientation, and each of the ankle ligaments is discussed in detail.

The origin points of the knee collateral ligaments: an MRI study on paediatric patients during growth.

PURPOSE: Different femoral origins for both the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) have been reported in the growing skeleton (epiphyseal and metaphyseal). Knowledge about the exact attachment sites is mandatory for anatomically correct reconstruction. This study assesses the femoral origins of the knee collateral ligaments in skeletally immature individuals using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: MRIs of 336 knee joints (median age 15 years (range 2-18 years), m = 209 and f = 127) were retrospectively analysed to assess the distances between the femoral origins of the MCL and LCL to the distal femoral growth plate. In 175 patients, the body sizes were additionally retrieved from medical records. RESULTS: Both MCL and LCL ligament origins were invariably located on the epiphysis. Mean MCL origin-growth plate distance was 9.6 mm (SD 2.1 mm; range 2.2-13.6 mm) in boys and 8.6 mm (SD 1.5 mm; range 3.4-12.0 mm) in girls. Mean LCL origin-growth plate distance was 9.3 mm (SD 1.8 mm; range 4.3-13.0 mm) in boys and 8.2 mm (SD 1.5 mm; range 3.4-11.8 mm) in girls. The distance between the growth plate and both collateral ligaments as well as the length of the LCL correlated positively with patients' age and body size (MCL R(2) = 0.673 and 0.556, LCL R (2) = 0.734 and 0.645, LCL length R(2) = 0.589 and 0.741; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During growth, the femoral origins of the MCL and the LCL are constantly located on the distal femoral epiphysis. There is a linear increase in the distances from the ligaments' origins to the growth plate according to age and body size. This new information may be of clinical importance for reconstructive surgery of the knee's collateral ligaments.

Anatomic description of the anterolateral ligament of the knee.

PURPOSE: The anterolateral ligament, a structure that has been known for 130 years, has again attracted the attention both of orthopaedic doctors and anatomists. Since its initial description until now, this structure has had different names. Whether labelled as the mid-third lateral capsular ligament, the anterior oblique band of the fibular collateral ligament or the anterolateral ligament of the knee, this structure has been responsible for the so-called Segond avulsion fractures. The aim of this study was to determine the precise position and layer of the lateral knee compartment within which the anterolateral ligament is located, as well as its type. METHODS: In this study, the anatomical dissection of the lateral segment of 14 cadaveric knees (six male, eight female; seven right, seven left; average age of subjects: 78 years) was performed. The dissection was carried out in keeping with Seebacher, layer by layer. RESULTS: The anterolateral ligament was identified in seven out of 14 cadaveric knee joints (50 %). The length of the ligament was 41 ± 3 mm, while the width was 4 ± 1 mm and the thickness 1 mm (in the middle section). In 14 % of the cases, the anterior oblique band was identified as a part of the FCL. In all of the knee joints, a part of the fibres of the ITT with the same insertions and direction as the ALL was found, located, however, at a much more superficial level than the ALL. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the current scientific literature related to the anterolateral ligament and layer-by-layer dissection of the lateral region of 14 cadaveric knees has led to the conclusion that the anterolateral ligament is a thickening of the knee joint capsule located in the third layer of the lateral region of the knee (according to Seebacher) which is not always clearly morphologically differentiated from the remainder of the joint capsule. The anterolateral ligament is unequivocally a part of the joint capsule, which is why any damage to it should be treated in the same way as any other damage to the joint capsule.