RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Novel interventions (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tafasitamab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L], polatuzumab-rituximab-bendamustine [pola-BR]) improve clinical outcomes in second-line (2 L) treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with early relapse or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The costs vary depending on the respective treatment regimen and the treatment duration, difficult comparability in reimbursement decisions. The objective was to analyze the health economic impacts of novel 2 L interventions and conventional immunochemotherapies (bendamustine-rituximab [BR], rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin [R-GemOx]) from a German healthcare payer's perspective as a function of treatment duration. METHODS: An economic model was developed to compare treatment costs of 2 L interventions depending on the treatment duration. Treatment duration was measured by progression-free survival (PFS), identified based on a systematic review. Total and average costs were calculated over 5 years to evaluate incremental costs at median PFS for each intervention. RESULTS: Average costs per month at median PFS ranged from 2846 (95% CI: 5067-1641) to 40 535 (95% CI: 91180-N/A) for BR and liso-cel, respectively. Incremental costs at the lowest median PFS (R-GemOx: 5.3 months) revealed -664, 5560, 11 817, 53 145, and 67 745 for BR, Tafa-L, pola-BR, axi-cel, and liso-cel as compared to R-GemOx, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses uncovered a variation of incremental costs of 2 L transplant-ineligible DLBCL interventions as a function of time leading to amortization of high-priced interventions.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment. It is important to better understand their use in Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients, who often differ from commercially insured populations in important ways. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data, focusing on the utilization patterns across three CAR T products-lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and axicabtagene autoleucel (axi-cel)-which are indicated for the treatment of DLBCL. Our investigation covered the period from 2021 through 2022. This analysis spanned a 180-day period prior to CAR T procedure and extended to a 90-day post-CAR T. Utilization of healthcare services, healthcare spending, and comorbidities were assessed in the pre- and post-periods. Clinical trial and PPS-exempt center claims were removed from the analysis. Statistical comparisons between inpatient and outpatient cohorts were made using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: Among the total 391 CAR T claims assessed, most of the CAR T therapies were administered in the inpatient setting (79%) compared to outpatient (21%). CAR T therapy in the inpatient setting received an average Medicare cost of US$498,723 ($276,138-$1,066,524), while the average Medicare cost for outpatient CAR T claims was $414,393 ($276,980-$849,878). There was a higher 3-month average post-period cost for those hospitals utilizing CAR T in the outpatient setting than the inpatient setting ($15,794 vs. $10,244). Despite the higher post-period cost, when looking at the CAR T procedure and pre- and post-periods as a single episode, beneficiaries receiving outpatient CAR T had less cost for the total episode of care ($587,908 vs. $529,188). Follow-up inpatient claims were also assessed post-CAR T procedure for 30 days. The rate of post-CAR T inpatient re-admission was significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving the index CAR T in the inpatient setting (21%) compared to outpatient CAR T (59%). Days between index CAR T discharge and IP admission were also significantly shorter for OP CAR T compared to IP CAR T (8.0 vs. 14.1 days, p < 0.0001). Additionally, IP CAR T had a longer ALOS on the admission claim (6.9 vs. 6.2 days). CONCLUSION: CAR T therapy for the treatment of LBCL has become more common within the Medicare population, primarily in the inpatient setting. This study helps understand providers' cost and associated patient care around CAR T administration. The data show that the average cost received by hospitals encompasses the expenses related to both the CAR T drug and the medical services delivered to patients.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Medicare , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Estados Unidos , Medicare/economia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Produtos Biológicos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos TRESUMO
Poor literature report actual and detailed costs of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell pathway in a real-life setting. We retrospectively collect data for all patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphoma who underwent leukapheresis between August 2019 and August 2022. All costs and medical resource consumption accountability were calculated on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, starting from leukapheresis to the time when the patient (infused or not) exited the CAR T-cell pathway for any reason. Eighty patients were addressed to leukapheresis and 59 were finally infused. After excluding CAR-T product cost, the main driver of higher costs were hospitalizations followed by the examinations/procedures and other drugs, respectively 43.9%, 26.3% and 25.4% of the total. Regarding costs of drugs and medications other than CAR T products, the most expensive items are those referred to AEs, both infective and extra-infective within 30 days from infusion, that account for 63% of the total. Density plot of cost analyses did not show any statistically significant difference with respect to the years of leukapheresis or infusion. To achieve finally 59/80 infused patients the per capita patients without CAR-T products results 74,000 euros. This analysis covers a growing concern on health systems, the burden of expenses related to CAR T-cell therapy, which appears to provide significant clinical benefit despite its high cost, thus making economic evaluations highly relevant. The relevance of this study should be also viewed in light of continuously evolving indications for this therapy.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Itália , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Adulto , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Leucaférese/economiaRESUMO
AIMS: There are multiple recently approved treatments and a lack of clear standard-of-care therapies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While total cost of care (TCC) by the number of lines of therapy (LoTs) has been evaluated, more recent cost estimates using real-world data are needed. This analysis assessed real-world TCC of R/R DLBCL therapies by LoT using the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (1 January 2015-31 December 2021), in US patients aged ≥18 years treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or an R-CHOP-like regimen as first-line therapy. METHODS: Treatment costs and resources in the R/R setting were assessed by LoT. A sensitivity analysis identified any potential confounding of the results caused by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization and costs. Overall, 310 patients receiving a second- or later-line treatment were included; baseline characteristics were similar across LoTs. Inpatient costs represented the highest percentage of total costs, followed by outpatient and pharmacy costs. RESULTS: Mean TCC per-patient-per-month generally increased by LoT ($40,604, $48,630, and $59,499 for second-, third- and fourth-line treatments, respectively). Costs were highest for fourth-line treatment for all healthcare resource utilization categories. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the overall analysis, indicating results were not confounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. LIMITATIONS: There was potential misclassification of LoT; claims data were processed through an algorithm, possibly introducing errors. A low number of patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients who switched insurance plans, had insurance terminated, or whose enrollment period met the end of data availability may have had truncated follow-up, potentially resulting in underestimated costs. CONCLUSION: Total healthcare costs increased with each additional LoT in the R/R DLBCL setting. Further improvements of first-line treatments that reduce the need for subsequent LoTs would potentially lessen the economic burden of DLBCL.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclofosfamida , Doxorrubicina , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Prednisona , Rituximab , Vincristina , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Vincristina/uso terapêutico , Vincristina/economia , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Idoso , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Prednisona/economia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/economia , Adulto , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Aim: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene (liso-cel) for treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in adult patients after ≥2 lines of therapy in Japan. Materials & methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the partition survival mixture cure model based on the ZUMA-1 trial and adjusted to the JULIET and TRANSCEND trials using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. Results & conclusion: Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental life years (3.13 and 2.85) and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2.65 and 2.24), thus generated lower incremental direct medical costs (-$976.29 [-¥137,657] and -$242.00 [-¥34,122]), compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel. Axi-cel was cost-effective option compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel from a Japanese payer's perspective.
[Box: see text].
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Antígenos CD19/economia , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Antígenos CD19/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Vacinas Anticâncer/economia , Vacinas Anticâncer/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Análise de Custo-EfetividadeRESUMO
The efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is well-established. This study, using the Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database, assessed hospital costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between CAR T-cell therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) for 733 LBCL patients from 01/01/2017-04/30/2021 (166 CAR T and 567 AHCT from 37 US hospital systems. CAR T-cell therapy had higher index costs but lower non-pharmacy costs, shorter hospital stays, lower ICU utilization than AHCT. The CAR T-cell cohort also presented fewer preparatory costs and HRU. At a 180-day follow-up, AHCT had lower hospitalization rates and costs. Overall, despite higher index costs, CAR T-cell therapy has lower non-pharmacy costs and HRU during the index procedure and requires less preparation time with lower preparation HRUs and costs than AHCT. This has important implications for resource management and informed decision-making for stakeholders.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Transplante Autólogo , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Idoso , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Adulto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little recent real-world evidence exists on overall survival, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among R/R DLBCL patients treated with the combination of rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), a widely-used regimen for patients ineligible for stem cell transplant due to age or comorbidities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used 2014 to 2019 U.S. Medicare claims. Individuals aged ≥66 years with a new DLBCL diagnosis between October 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and continuous fee-for-service Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage in the 12 months pre- and postindex were followed to identify the sample of patients with evidence of R-GemOx treatment in the second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) setting. Outcomes included overall survival, all-cause and DLBCL-related HCRU, and costs after R-GemOx initiation. RESULTS: The final sample included 157 patients who received treatment with R-GemOx in the R/R settings (mean (SD) age 77.5 (6.0) years, 39.5% age>80 years; 66.9% male; 91.1% White). Of these, 126 received R-GemOx in the 2L setting and 31 received R-GemOx in the 3L setting. Median overall survival from R-GemOx initiation was 6.9 months and 6.8 months in the 2L and 3L setting, respectively. Rates of all-cause hospitalization (68.1% [2L] and >90% [3L]) and hospice use (42.9% [2L] and 51.7% [3L]) were high in the 12 months after R-GemOx initiation. All-cause total costs were substantial ($144,653 [2L] and $142,812 [3L]) and approximately 80% of costs were DLBCL-related within 12 months of R-GemOx initiation. CONCLUSION: Elderly U.S. Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL who initiated R-GemOx treatment in the R/R setting have poor overall survival, high rates of HCRU, and substantial costs.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gencitabina , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Oxaliplatina/economia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/economia , MedicareRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to identify sources of variability in cost-effectiveness analyses of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, evaluated by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, focusing on young compared with older patients. METHODS: HTA evaluations in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were included from Australia, Canada, England, Norway, and the United States. Key clinical evidence, economic approach, and outcomes (costs, quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios) were summarized. RESULTS: Fourteen HTA evaluations were identified (5 ALL, 9 DLBCL [4 tisagenlecleucel, 5 axicabtagene]). Analyses were naive comparisons of prospective single-arm studies for the CAR-Ts with retrospective cohort studies for the comparators. Key clinical evidence and economic model approaches were generally consistent by CAR-T and indication, although outcomes varied. Notably, incremental QALYs varied substantially in ALL (3.67-10.6 QALYs gained), whereas variation in DLBCL was less (1.21-1.97 [tisagenlecleucel], 1.97-3.40 [axicabtagene]). Discounting of costs and outcomes varied, with the highest QALYs generated for tisagenlecleucel in ALL (10.95) associated with the lowest discount rate (1.5%) and vice versa (4.97 QALYs; 5% discount rate). The approach to extrapolation of overall survival data varied, even where the same empirical data were used. CONCLUSION: Modeled, long-term treatment benefit in young patients may be associated with greater uncertainty compared with adults because of potential life-long benefits with cell and gene therapies. This reflects the methodological challenges identified by HTA agencies associated with single-arm, short-term studies.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/economia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Aim: To understand the economic burden of relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients in Japan treated with salvage chemotherapy. Patients & methods: Patients who received systemic therapy after first-line treatment were analyzed to assess its associated cost and resource use using a retrospective claims database. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed separately. Results & conclusion: This study identified 2927 and 1085 patients in the second- (2L) and third-line (3L) cohorts. The median ages for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 71 and 70 years, respectively, with Charlson Comorbidity Score of 3. A majority of the patients had limited stem cell transplant due to advanced age. Median lengths of inpatient stay for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 118 and 116 days, respectively. The majority of costs were attributed to inpatient costs, and limited COVID-19 impact was observed in this study.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/epidemiologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/economia , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco/economia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Limited data are available regarding treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), treatment costs and clinical outcomes for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Japan. This retrospective database study analyzed the Medical Data Vision database for DLBCL patients who received treatment during the identification period from October 1 2008 to December 31 2017. Among 6,965 eligible DLBCL patients, 5,541 patients (79.6%) received first-line (1L) rituximab (R)-based therapy, and then were gradually switched to chemotherapy without R in subsequent lines of therapy. In each treatment regimen, 1L treatment cost was the highest among all lines of therapy. The major cost drivers i.e. total direct medical costs until death or censoring across all regimens and lines of therapy were from the 1L regimen and inpatient costs. During the follow-up period, DLBCL patients who received a 1L R-CHOP regimen achieved the highest survival rate and longest time-to-next-treatment, with a relatively low mean treatment cost due to lower inpatient healthcare resource utilization and fewer lines of therapy compared to other 1L regimens. Our retrospective analysis of clinical practices in Japanese DLBCL patients demonstrated that 1L treatment and inpatient costs were major cost contributors and that the use of 1L R-CHOP was associated with better clinical outcomes at a relatively low mean treatment cost.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Doxorrubicina/economia , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Japão/epidemiologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/economia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prednisona/economia , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rituximab/administração & dosagem , Rituximab/economia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Análise de Sobrevida , Vincristina/economia , Vincristina/uso terapêutico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal chemotherapy regimen for treating HIV associated NHL in low resource settings is unknown. We conducted a retrospective study to describe survival rates, treatment response rates and adverse events in patients with HIV associated NHL treated with CHOP and dose adjusted-EPOCH regimens at the Uganda Cancer Institute. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with HIV and lymphoma and treated at the Uganda Cancer Institute from 2016 to 2018 was done. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients treated with CHOP and 12 patients treated with DA-EPOCH were analysed. Patients completing 6 or more cycles of chemotherapy were 51 (47%) in the CHOP group and 8 (67%) in the DA-EPOCH group. One year overall survival (OS) rate in patients treated with CHOP was 54.5% (95% CI, 42.8-64.8) and 80.2% (95% CI, 40.3-94.8) in those treated with DA-EPOCH. Factors associated with favourable survival were BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, (p = 0.03) and completion of 6 or more cycles of chemotherapy, (p < 0.001). The overall response rate was 40% in the CHOP group and 59% in the DA-EPOCH group. Severe adverse events occurred in 19 (18%) patients in the CHOP group and 3 (25%) in the DA-EPOCH group; these were neutropenia (CHOP = 13, 12%; DA-EPOCH = 2, 17%), anaemia (CHOP = 12, 12%; DA-EPOCH = 1, 8%), thrombocytopenia (CHOP = 7, 6%; DA-EPOCH = 0), sepsis (CHOP = 1), treatment related death (DA-EPOCH = 1) and hepatic encephalopathy (CHOP = 1). CONCLUSION: Treatment of HIV associated NHL with curative intent using CHOP and infusional DA-EPOCH is feasible in low resource settings and associated with > 50% 1 year survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Anemia/economia , Anemia/epidemiologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/economia , Esquema de Medicação , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/efeitos adversos , Etoposídeo/economia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/induzido quimicamente , Encefalopatia Hepática/economia , Encefalopatia Hepática/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas/economia , Infusões Intravenosas/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/economia , Neutropenia/epidemiologia , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/induzido quimicamente , Sepse/economia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/economia , Trombocitopenia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Uganda/epidemiologia , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/economiaRESUMO
Importance: Axicabtagene ciloleucel, an anti-CD19-CD28-CD3ζ chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, was the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved, genetically engineered T-cell therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. There has not been a US Food and Drug Administration-approved product for these cancers in more than 4 decades. Observations: Unlike traditional anticancer therapies, axicabtagene ciloleucel is a patient-specific, live-cell product that has unique requirements for manufacturing, shipping, and storage, as well as for its administration and management of its adverse events. In addition, axicabtagene ciloleucel has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory LBCL. This review presents a timeline of the rapid clinical development of axicabtagene ciloleucel from bench to bedside, highlights how axicabtagene ciloleucel satisfies an unmet medical need for treatment of refractory LBCL, outlines the logistics of the production process and administration of axicabtagene ciloleucel, describes its mechanism of action, and summarizes the results of the pivotal study. This review also provides a survey of adverse events, with attention to the kinetics of their clinical presentation; discusses the management of adverse events; and offers suggestions for appropriate patient selection for safe administration of axicabtagene ciloleucel. Conclusions and Relevance: The integration of axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy into standard-of-care practice for relapsed/refractory LBCL is the beginning of a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with LBCL and is likely to lead to improvements in their survival and curability. Timely referral to centers offering the therapy is necessary for optimal patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Antígenos CD19/efeitos adversos , Antígenos CD19/economia , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Produtos Biológicos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use Microsoft Excel spreadsheet software to fit parametric survival distributions. We also explain the differences between individual patient data (IPD) and survival data reconstructed in Excel and SAS. METHODS: Three sets of patient data on overall survival were compared using different methods: 'original' IPD, 'reconstructed SAS', and 'reconstructed Excel'. The best-fit distribution was selected using visual observation, supported by linear plots of predicted probabilities, goodness-of-fit coefficients, and the sum of squared error of prediction. Outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net benefit (INB), incremental cost, and life-years gained over short-term and lifetime horizons. These were compared for different data sets. RESULTS: In this example, log-normal, log-logistic, and Weibull distributions showed best-fit with the visual tests and goodness-of-fit statistics. Weibull and exponential distributions showed significant differences compared with IPD data. Data on short-term (5 years) time horizons produced by different data re-creation methods showed closeness with data reconstructed from SAS. The ICER and INB results were dependent on the time horizon and selected parametric distribution from the model. CONCLUSIONS: Different approaches used in fitting parametric survival distributions yielded predicted probabilities that substantially differed from those using original IPD. Our study highlights the importance of following guidelines for economic evaluations with a systematic approach to parametric survival analysis techniques in order to select best fitting parametric survival distributions.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Modelos Econômicos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Algoritmos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Cadeias de Markov , Probabilidade , SoftwareRESUMO
Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is a clinically heterogeneous disease. Treatment pathways for DLBCL are diverse and integrate established and novel therapies.Areas covered: We review the cost burden of DLBCL and the cost-effectiveness of DLBCL management including precision and cellular medicine. We utilized Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords to search the National Library of Medicine online MEDLINE database (PubMed) for articles related to cost, cost burden, and cost-of-illness of DLBCL and cost-effectiveness of DLBCL management strategies published in English as of June 2019.Expert commentary: Available and developing DLBCL therapies offer improved outcomes and often curative treatment at considerable financial expense, and the total cost burden for DLBCL management is substantial for patients and the healthcare system. In the era of personalized medicine, CAR T cells and targeted therapies provide exciting avenues for current and future DLBCL care and can further increase treatment cost. Determinations of cost and cost-effectiveness in DLBCL treatment pathways should continue to guide care providers and systems in identifying cost reduction strategies to provide appropriate therapies to the greatest number of patients in treating DLBCL.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/economia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/economiaRESUMO
Introduction: The new category of chimeric antigen receptor T - cell raised hopes for a more effective treatment of large B cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nevertheless, their soaring acquisition costs will stretch the fiscal capacity of the health systems worldwide. To this direction, the scope of this study is to provide a systematic review of their economic evaluations. Areas covered: A systematic review of the economic evaluations of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene was performed. Expert opinion: The available data indicate that these products demonstrate a potentially favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. Nevertheless, their budget impact is of overriding importance and it should be incorporated in any economic evaluation. Moreover, more affirmative clinical data are imperative in order to mitigate uncertainty.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19 , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T , Humanos , Antígenos CD19/administração & dosagem , Antígenos CD19/economia , Antígenos CD19/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/economia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/administração & dosagem , Receptores de Antígenos QuiméricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the cost of treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Malawi under the following circumstances: (1) palliation only, (2) first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), (3) salvage etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (EPIC), and (4) salvage gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX). METHODS: We conducted a microcosting analysis from the health system perspective in the context of a prospective cohort study at a national teaching hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. Clinical outcomes data were derived from previously published literature from the cohort. Cost data were collected for treatment and 2-year follow-up, reflecting costs incurred by the research institution or referral hospital for goods and services. Costs were collected in Malawian kwacha, inflated and converted to 2017 US dollars. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, palliative care alone cost $728 per person. Total costs for first-line treatment with CHOP chemotherapy was $1,844, of which chemotherapy drugs made up 15%. Separate salvage EPIC and GEMOX cost $2,597 and $3,176, respectively. Chemotherapy drugs accounted for 30% of EPIC and 47% of GEMOX. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is among the first published efforts to characterize detailed costs of cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa. The per-patient cost of first-line treatment of DLBCL in Malawi is low relative to high-income countries, suggesting that investments in fixed-duration, curative-intent DLBCL treatment may be attractive in sub-Saharan Africa. Salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL costs much more than first-line therapy. Formal cost-effectiveness modeling for CHOP and salvage treatment in the Malawian and other low-resource settings is needed to inform decision makers about optimal use of resources for cancer treatment.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Terapia de Salvação/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Malaui , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Two anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are approved for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel; each costs $373,000. We evaluated their cost effectiveness. METHODS: We used a decision analytic Markov model informed by recent multicenter, single-arm trials to evaluate axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel in multiply relapsed/refractory, adult, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from a US health payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Under a range of plausible long-term effectiveness assumptions, each therapy was compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy regimens and stem-cell transplantation. Main outcomes were undiscounted life years, discounted lifetime costs, discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (3% annual discount rate). Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty. RESULTS: In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 40% 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), axi-cel increased life expectancy by 8.2 years at $129,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $90,000 to $219,000). At a 30% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were more modest (6.4 years) and expensive ($159,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $284,000]). In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 35% 5-year PFS, tisagenlecleucel increased life expectancy by 4.6 years at $168,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $414,000/QALY). At a 25% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were smaller (3.4 years) and more expensive ($223,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $123,000 to $1,170,000/QALY]). Administering CAR-T to all indicated patients would increase US health care costs by approximately $10 billion over 5 years. Price reductions to $250,000 and $200,000, respectively, or payment only for initial complete response (at current prices) would allow axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel to cost less than $150,000/QALY, even at 25% PFS. CONCLUSION: At 2018 prices, it is possible that both CAR-T therapies meet a less than $150,000/QALY threshold. This depends on long-term outcomes compared with chemoimmunotherapy and stem-cell transplantation, which are uncertain. Widespread adoption would substantially increase non-Hodgkin lymphoma health care costs. Price reductions or payment for initial response would improve cost effectiveness, even with modest long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia Adotiva/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/imunologia , Antígenos CD19/economia , Produtos Biológicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (dlbcl) accounts for 30%-40% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Approximately 60% of patients are cured with standard treatment. Targeted treatments are being investigated and might improve disease outcomes; however, their effect on cancer drug budgets will be significant. For the present study, we conducted an analysis of real-world costs for dlbcl patients treated in British Columbia, useful for health care system planning. Methods: Patient records from a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with dlbcl in British Columbia during 2004-2013 were anonymously linked across multiple administrative data sources: systemic therapy, radiotherapy, hospitalizations, oncologist services, outpatient medications, and fee-for-service physician services. Using generalized linear modelling regression, time-dependent costs (in 2015 Canadian dollars) were estimated in 6-month intervals over a 5-year period. The inverse probability weighting method was applied to account for censored observations. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to estimate standard errors for the mean cost at each time interval. Results: The cohort consisted of 678 patients (5-year overall survival: 67%). Mean age at diagnosis was 64 ± 14 years; median follow-up was 3.2 years. Mean total cost of care was highest in the first 6 months after diagnosis ($29,120; 95% confidence interval: $28,986 to $29,170) and after disease progression ($18,480; 95% confidence interval: $15,187 to $24,772). Systemic therapy and hospitalization costs were the largest cost drivers. At each time interval, costs were observed to be positively skewed. Conclusions: Our results depict real-world costs for the treatment of dlbcl patients with standard chop-r therapy. Cost-model parameters are also provided for economic modelling of dlbcl interventions.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Colúmbia Britânica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/economia , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/economia , Prednisona/economia , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/economia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Vincristina/economia , Vincristina/uso terapêutico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: About one third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse after receiving first-line (1L) treatment of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Relapsed patients may then be eligible for second-line (2L) therapy. The study's objective was to examine health care use and costs among treated patients with DLBCL receiving 2L therapy versus those without relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed Truven Health MarketScan® claims data between 2006 and 2015. Patients (≥18 years of age) had ≥1 DLBCL claim from 1 year before to 90 days after beginning 1L therapy, and comprised those without 2L treatment for ≥2 years (cured controls) versus those who initiated non-R-CHOP chemotherapy after discontinuing 1L therapy (2L cohort). 2L patients were further subgrouped: hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT [yes/no]) and time of relapse (months between 1L and 2L): early (≤3), mid (4-12), and late (>12) relapse. The primary outcome was 1- and 2-year health care costs. Hospitalization rate and length of stay were also measured. RESULTS: A total of 1,374 patients with DLBCL received R-CHOP and fulfilled all criteria: 1,157 cured controls and 217 2L patients (87 early-relapse, 66 mid-relapse, 64 late-relapse). Twenty-eight percent of 2L patients received HSCT. Charlson Comorbidity Index/mortality risk was higher for 2L patients (4.2 [SD: 3.0]) versus controls (3.8 [2.6]; p = .039), as were yearly costs (Year 1: $210,488 [$172,851] vs. $25,044 [$32,441]; p < .001 and Year 2: $267,770 [$266,536] vs. $42,272 [$49,281]; p < .001). HSCT and chemotherapy were each significant contributors of cost among 2L patients. CONCLUSION: DLBCL is resource intensive, particularly for 2L patients. Great need exists for newer, effective therapies for DLBCL that may save lives and reduce costs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study identified multiple important drivers of cost in the understudied population of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving second-line (2L) treatment. Such drivers included hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chemotherapy. Even though HSCT is currently the only curative therapy for DLBCL, less than one third of patients receiving 2L and subsequent treatment underwent transplant, which indicates potential underuse. The variation in chemotherapy regimens suggested a lack of consensus for best practices. Further research focusing on newer and more effective treatment options for DLBCL has the potential to decrease mortality, in addition to reducing the extensive costs related to therapy options such as transplant.