Vitreoretinal large B- cell lymphoma (VR- LBCL): Clinical and pathological features and treatment outcomes.

CONTEXT: Vitreoretinal large B- cell lymphoma (VR- LBCL) is a type of non- Hodgkin lymphoma confined to the eye and central nervous system (CNS). The clinical manifestations of intraocular lymphoma can precede, occur simultaneously with, or follow disease at CNS sites. It differs from other forms of extra-nodal lymphoma; in that it does not involve systemic sites other than CNS. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the clinical and pathological features, and treatment outcomes of a cohort of patients diagnosed with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) in Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Ireland between 2010 and 2024. METHOD: Retrospective review of medical records and pathology specimens of patients with ocular involvement in VR- LBCL over 14-year period and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Eight patients were included. All of them underwent pars plana vitrectomy and were confirmed to have VR- LBCL. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. Three were men and five were women. Six had bilateral disease and two unilateral. Four of four patients had MYD88 L265P mutation present. Four patients showed a high interleukin-10 (IL-10) to interleukins-6 (IL-6) ratio in keeping with the diagnosis of VRL. Three patients had primary CNS lymphoma with subsequent eye involvement, despite systemic chemotherapy treatment. Of the five patients who presented with ocular lymphoma, two patients had CNS involvement after primary vitreoretinal lymphoma was diagnosed. Of those, one was initially treated with local intravitreal chemotherapy. Three patients had no CNS recurrence. At the time of this study, seven patients of eight are alive, four are disease free and two are on a first- line local chemotherapy treatment. One underwent treatment for CNS relapse. One patient died of the disease before commencing targeted therapy. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrated excellent treatment outcomes for seven patients, alive at the time of the study. Both local radiotherapy and intravitreal chemotherapy achieved good ocular control with acceptable side effects and no significant difference in visual outcome. VRL is a difficult diagnosis and vitreous cytology should be prioritised in cases of vitritis unresponsive to treatment. Analysis of MYD88 L265P mutation and IL- 10: IL- 6 ratio >1 are useful adjuncts in the diagnosis of VR- LBCL, particularly in cases where limited vitreous material makes cytological evaluation challenging.

Diagnostic methods for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: A systematic review.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma is a potentially aggressive intraocular malignancy with poor systemic prognosis and sometimes significant diagnostic delays as it may masquerade as chronic uveitis. Despite the variety of diagnostic techniques, it is unclear which modality is most accurate in the diagnosis of PVRL. A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for studies published between January, 2000, and June, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the following diagnostic tools used to diagnose patients with PVRL were included: cytology, flow cytometry, MYD88 L265P mutation, CD79B mutation, interleukin 10/interleukin-6 (IL-10/IL-6) ratio, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and immunoglobulin kappa light chain (IgK) rearrangements, and imaging findings. The aggregated sensitivity of each diagnostic modality was reported and compared using the chi-squared (χ2) test. A total of 662 eyes from 29 retrospective studies reporting on patients diagnosed with PVRL were included. An IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater than 1 had the highest sensitivity (89.39%, n = 278/311 eyes, n = 16 studies) for PVRL, where the sensitivity was not significantly different when only vitreous samples were drawn (88.89%, n = 232/261 eyes, n = 13 studies) compared to aqueous samples (83.33%, n = 20/24, n = 2) (p = 0.42). Flow cytometry of vitreous samples gave a positive result in 66/75 eyes (88.00%, n = 6 studies) with PVRL, and monoclonal IgH rearrangements on PCR gave a positive result in 354/416 eyes (85.10%, n = 20 studies) with PVRL. MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutation analysis performed poorly, yielding a positive result in 63/90 eyes (70.00%, n = 8 studies) with PVRL, and 20/57 eyes (35.09%, n = 4 studies) with PVRL, respectively. Overall, our systematic review found that an IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater or equal to one may provide the highest sensitivity in identifying patients with PVRL. Future studies are needed to employ multiple diagnostic tools to aid in the detection of PVRL and to further establish nuanced guidelines when determining the optimal diagnostic tool to use in diverse patient populations.

Comprehensive Laboratory Diagnostic Workup for Patients with Suspected Intraocular Lymphoma including Flow Cytometry, Molecular Genetics and Cytopathology.

BACKGROUND: Intraocular lymphoma (IOL) presents a real challenge in daily diagnostics. Cyto- and/or histopathology of vitreous body represent the diagnostic cornerstones. Yet, false negative results remain common. Therefore, we analyzed the diagnostic significance of flow cytometry (FC) within the workup algorithm of IOL and compared its sensitivity with the results obtained from routine cytopathology and molecular genetics; Methods: Seven patients undergoing vitrectomy due to suspected IOL were investigated by FC and parallel cytopathology and, if available, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for MYD88 L265P; Results: Four out of seven patients were finally diagnosed with IOL. Among the IOL patients, cytopathology confirmed the presence of lymphoma cells in only two cases. In contrast, FC was positive for IOL in all four cases, and FC additionally confirmed the lack of IOL in the remaining patients. In IOL patients diagnosed by FC and with available ddPCR, the diagnosis of IOL was confirmed by the presence of the MYD88 L265P mutation in all three patients; Conclusions: The combination with FC was superior to cytopathology alone in the diagnostic work-up of IOL, and it showed an excellent correlation with ddPCR results. A comprehensive diagnostic panel consisting of cytopathology, FC and molecular genetics should be considered for the work-up of suspected IOL.

Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: Optimizing Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of adjunctive tests, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), cytokine analysis, flow cytometry, and IgH gene rearrangement testing, achieves improved diagnostic parameters compared with cytologic smears alone in the detection of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). To determine which of these tests or combination of tests provide the greatest diagnostic utility. DESIGN: Retrospective review to assess diagnostic value. METHODS: This single university-affiliated tertiary care center study included data from 237 vitreous biopsies performed between 1999 and 2017 in patients with suspected VRL. From 1999 to 2008-2009, cytologic smears were the sole test performed (84 cases). The protocol initiated in 2008-2009 added the 4 additional diagnostic tests (153 cases). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and diagnostic yield were calculated. Parameters were calculated for tests individually, for all 5 combined, and all possible 2-, 3-, and 4-test combinations. For cytologic smears, diagnostic parameters were calculated both before and after the addition of adjunctive tests to our protocol and for the entire cohort. RESULTS: Of the 237 vitreous biopsies, 50 samples (21%) were from patients with confirmed central nervous system lymphoma and/or actively treated central nervous system, systemic, or intraocular lymphoma. Diagnostic yields (95% CI) were 90% (85%-93%) for smears, 82% (72%-89%) for IHC, 91% (85%-96%) for cytokine analysis, 76% (67%-84%) for IgH gene rearrangement, and 50% (40%-60%) for flow cytometry. For smears, the sensitivity pre-protocol was 73% (39%-94%), compared with 87% (69%-96%) post-protocol. IgH gene rearrangement was the only test exhibiting low sensitivity (40%). The combination of smears, IHC, and cytokine analysis exhibited the highest diagnostic parameters, with sensitivity 92%, specificity 98%, and diagnostic yield 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cytologic smears, IHC, and cytokine analysis seems to be a reasonable and sufficient protocol for the diagnosis of suspected VRL. IgH gene rearrangement and flow cytometry may be the most expendable tests from our protocol.

Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis of Vitreoretinal Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To provide recommendations for diagnosis of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). METHODS: Literature was reviewed for reports supporting the diagnosis of VRL. A questionnaire (Delphi 1 round) was distributed to 28 participants. In the second round (Delphi 2), items of the questionnaire not reaching consensus (75% agreement) were discussed to finalize the recommendations. RESULTS: Presenting symptoms include floaters and painless loss of vision, vitreous cells organized into sheets or clumps. Retinal lesions are usually multifocal creamy/white in the outer retina. Other findings include retinal lesions with "leopard-skin" appearance and retinal pigment epithelium atrophy. Severe vitreous infiltration without macular edema is the most likely presentation. Diagnostic vitrectomy should be performed. Systemic corticosteroid should be discontinued at least 2 weeks before surgery. An interleukin (IL)-10:IL-6 ratio > 1, positive mutation for the myeloid differentiation primary response 88 gene and monoclonality are indicators of VRL. Multi-modal imaging (optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence) are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus meeting allowed the establishment of recommendations important for the diagnosis of VRL.

Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: A Literature Review and Introduction of a New Diagnostic Method.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to briefly review the clinical and diagnostic features of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) and to introduce the recent introduction of metagenomic deep sequencing in this ocular lymphomatous disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: Review and description of the process of using metagenomic deep sequencing for ocular specimens at the Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA. RESULTS: VRL masquerades as a uveitis, but clinical signs of subretinal lesions, and vitritis should prompt the inclusion of VRL in a differential diagnosis. Imaging features such as hyporeflective infiltrative lesions between the retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch's membrane are compatible with VRL, but diagnosis requires satisfying specific cytopathological and immunohistochemical or molecular features. Diagnosis, then, is subject to the cellularity, viability, and volume of the specimen submitted for these tests. Metagenomic deep sequencing has the ability to detect numerous lymphoma-associated mutations and is able to utilize minute volume samples and cell-free nucleic acid, so is well-suited for ocular tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Metagenomic deep sequencing may offer an additional tool in the future with which to diagnose VRL.

Clinical Experience in a Large Cohort of Patients with Vitreoretinal Lymphoma in a Single Center.

Background/aims: To report our five-year experience on vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) as a single-center tertiary hospital. Methods: The ophthalmic, cytopathology, and onco-hematologic records of patients with VRL consecutively seen from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. Results: Fifty-nine eyes of 31 patients with large B-cell VRL were included. Eighty-one percent has developed central nervous system lymphoma at the end of follow-up. Several different imaging findings were noted, including vitritis, leopard spot appearance, Bruch's membrane/RPE infiltrations, and ellipsoid zone disruption. A variable combination of MYD88-L265P mutation in the aqueous and/or in the vitreous and positive cytology/histology allowed to reach a definite diagnosis in all the patients. Therapies included intravitreal injections of methotrexate and rituximab, systemic chemotherapy, pan-encephalic radiotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: No definite guidelines exist for VRL management. It is crucial to collect as much data as possible from tertiary referral hospitals, which suitably manage a conspicuous number of VRL patients.

PreservCyt Is an Optimal Fixative that Permits Cytologic and Molecular Analyses of Vitreoretinal Lymphoma Biopsies.

Purpose: Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a potentially fatal intraocular malignancy. Diagnosis is hampered by poor preservation of morphology and DNA/RNA integrity, which precludes adjunctive molecular analysis. We aimed to determine the optimum fixative protocol for VRL biopsies that permits cytology, IHC/flow cytometry and molecular analyses.Methods: Six fixatives were compared on cultured Pfeiffer cells used as a cellular model. Cells were fixed and evaluated on cellular morphology, antibody staining, DNA/RNA amount and integrity. VRL clinical cases were used as validation and proof-of-concept.Results: PreservCyt was the best fixative for preserving cellular morphology and high-quality RNA/DNA from vitreous fluid biopsies. Cells from clinical VRL cases fixed with PreservCyt showed adequate cellular morphology and IHC positivity. Sufficient DNA was obtained for IgH clonality and MYD88 mutation detection using remnant cytological fluid.Conclusions: PreservCyt maintains good morphology and RNA/DNA integrity suggesting that it is a suitable fixative for VRL diagnosis and molecular analysis.

Clinical Relevance of the High Prevalence of MYD88 L265P Mutated Vitreoretinal Lymphoma Identified by Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Purpose: To investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of missense mutation at position 265 changing leucine to proline in the myeloid differentiation factor 88 gene (MYD88 L265P) in the vitreous of Chinese patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR).Methods: Vitreous fluid (VF) from 29 eyes of 20 VRL patients at the North Huashan Hospital were included. MYD88 L265P analysis of VF was performed using ddPCR. Associations between clinicopathologic characteristics and MYD88 mutation were analyzed using t-test or Fisher's exact test.Results: MYD88 L265P mutations were detected in 22 of 29 samples from 14 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and one patient with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma. However, no significant associations were found between MYD88 L265P mutation status and age, sex, lymphoma subtype or location of the primary lesion.Conclusion: The high prevalence of MYD88 L265P identified by ddPCR suggests that this method of evaluating the frequency of MYD88 L265P is a promising tool for accurate diagnosis of VRL.

Serial Detection of MYD88 L265P Mutation in the Aqueous Humor of a Patient with Vitreoretinal Lymphoma for Disease Monitoring.

PURPOSE: To report a case of a patient whose MYD88 mutation disappeared from the aqueous humor following treatment with intravitreal methotrexate. METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical, histopathological and imaging records. RESULTS: A 49-year-old woman presented with bilateral primary vitreoretinal lymphoma confirmed by molecular and next-generation sequencing studies on vitreous biopsy samples. Initially, the MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in aqueous samples of both eyes. Serial testing for MYD88 L265P mutations performed on aqueous samples collected at the time of the weekly intravitreal methotrexate injections showed the mutation ceased to be detected after four weekly injections in the non-vitrectomized right eye and after two weekly injections in the vitrectomized left eye. Clinical improvement accompanied the negativization of the mutation in both eyes. CONCLUSION: We present a case that demonstrates the possible utilization of serial testing for the MYD88 L265P mutation as a tool for monitoring disease course in vitreoretinal lymphoma.

MYD88 L265P mutation in intraocular lymphoma: A potential diagnostic marker.

PURPOSE: Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is the most common intraocular lymphoma (IOL). This can be either primary or secondary to the central nervous system lymphoma. The diagnosis of primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) currently relies on clinical diagnosis and cytological analysis of the vitreous or subretinal biopsy. Although most cases are diagnosed without much issue, the limited amount of vitreous fluid, subjectivity in cytological reporting, and special expertise in ocular pathology make the diagnosis challenging. MYD88 L265P mutation has been implicated to have diagnostic utility in PIOL. In this study, we screened consecutive vitreous biopsies for the presence of MYD88 L265P mutation to understand its diagnostic utility compared to conventional cytological analysis. METHODS: Cytological analysis and MYD88 L265P mutation by PCR-based sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were carried out on consecutive vitreous and subretinal biopsies collected from 21 patients. The diagnostic utility of the cytology and MYD88 L265P mutation analysis were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 21 patients, 15 had clinical suspicion of having PIOL. Out of these suspected cases of PIOL, nine were confirmed on follow-up, while six were diagnosed as other intraocular pathologies. Diagnostic utility of MYD88 L265P mutation analysis revealed a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 91.6%, positive and negative predictive value of 88.9% and 91.7%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of 90.5% was achieved with the mutation analysis that shows the superiority of MYD88 in both ruling in and ruling out PIOL. The diagnostic utility of MYD88 L265P mutation was superior to conventional cytological analysis. CONCLUSION: The analysis of MYD88 L265P mutation is reliable and efficient in the diagnosis of PIOL.

Molecular profiling of vitreous fluid by massively parallel sequencing: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: In cases of suspected intraocular malignancy, vitreous may be the preferred pathologic sample; however, cellularity may be insufficient for definitive cytopathological diagnosis. Ancillary methodology to study vitreous fluid aspiration for mutational analysis may assist in treatment decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three individual patient vitreous humor samples were received in the laboratory for mutation testing. The samples were collected during standard of care and analyzed for routine cytopathology. In each case, cytopathology was inconclusive and mutational analyses to support diagnostic suspicions were clinically requested. Based on the clinically and pathologically suspected diagnoses, an appropriate massively parallel sequencing assay previously validated for clinical use was performed using DNA extracted from vitreous samples that had previously undergone various processing. Nucleic acid yield was assessed by fluorometric or spectrophotometric methods, with yield ranging from 2.7 to 86.5 ng. Library preparations were performed using standard laboratory protocols. RESULTS: Two of the cases were suspicious for melanoma and a 50-gene solid tumor panel was performed. The third case was worrisome for vitreoretinal lymphoma and a 49-gene myeloid panel was performed. CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, the molecular profiling assisted with the clinical assessment and/or management of each patient.

Immunohistochemical and Immunocytochemical Analyses in Patients with Vitreoretinal Lymphoma.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze immunohistochemical and immunocytological findings by examining enucleated eyes and vitreous cell block (CB) in patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL).Methods: Histological specimens were obtained from two enucleated eyes with VRL associated with neovascular glaucoma. CB specimens were prepared in 18 patients from diluted waste fluids containing shredded vitreous. Histological and cytological specimens were submitted for hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunopathological analyses.Results: Both specimens demonstrated massive infiltration of large lymphoma cells. The lymphoma cells were positive for CD20 and MUM-1 in enucleated eyes. Membranous immunoreactivity for CD20 was observed in lymphoma cells in CB with VRL. Bcl-6 and MUM-1 were marked in five and eight out of nine cases examined, respectivelyConclusions: Cytological findings in CB specimens indicated similar histopathological characteristics of enucleated eyes. CB specimens obtained from vitreous waste diluted fluids may serve as effective materials for cytological diagnosis of VRL.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: empowering our clinical suspicion.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is well known as a masquerade syndrome. However, delays in diagnosis are common particularly because of the small volume of tissue that is used for investigative studies. We outline the current diagnostic tests available to clinicians and provide a glimpse of possible future novel diagnostics. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of spectral domain ocular coherence tomography to identify subretinal lesions has proven to be a reliable ally to clinicians. Nevertheless, the diagnostic gold standard remains cytology, which requires a skilled pathologist. Molecular tests, including MYD88 polymerase chain reaction testing has further refined our diagnostic capabilities. Metagenomic deep sequencing is a newer molecular test that offers the ability to identify any mutation associated with lymphoma development and may offer more sensitive testing in the future. SUMMARY: Clinicians have developed a strong acumen for suspecting VRL based upon clinical features, which can further be supported by a variety of imaging modalities. Delays in diagnosis continue to occur particularly because of the small volume of ocular fluid available for testing and because current tests offer a biased approach in terms of limited scope of detecting a specific mutation or cytopathologic feature(s). Newer molecular techniques feature an expanded scope of detecting any mutation associated with lymphomatous development.

MYD88 L265P MUTATION DETECTION IN THE AQUEOUS HUMOR OF PATIENTS WITH VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA.

PURPOSE: To detect the presence of MYD88 L265P mutation in the aqueous humor of patients with cytologically proven vitreoretinal lymphoma. METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with bilateral vitreoretinal lymphoma (16 eyes) were prospectively evaluated. Genomic DNA was extracted from aqueous samples after paracentesis and vitreous humor samples after diagnostic vitrectomy. MYD88 codon 265 mutation was investigated by both amplification-refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction approach and pyrosequencing assay in the aqueous humor of all patients and in the vitreous of 6 patients. A control group of 8 age-matched patients with established diagnosis of noninfectious uveitis was also tested for the presence of MYD88 L265P mutation in the aqueous humor. RESULTS: Eight patients (three men, five women) with mean age of 69.5 years (range 50-85 years) were considered. All the patients tested for MYD88 L265P in the vitreous (six) were positive, and this result was consistent with cytological examination in all samples but one. The MYD88 L265P mutation was found in the aqueous of 6 patients (75%), and in 3 of them, the mutation was present in both eyes. Results of MYD88 L265P mutation in aqueous and vitreous sample were consistent in 7 of the 8 eyes with available samples. The aqueous humor of the noninfectious uveitis control group was negative for the detection of MYD88 L265P mutation. CONCLUSION: MYD88 mutation was detected in the aqueous humor of 75% of patients with cytologically proven vitreoretinal lymphoma. This technique may be considered as an additional diagnostic tool in the detection of the disease.

Potential Diagnosis of Vitreoretinal Lymphoma by Detection of MYD88 Mutation in Aqueous Humor With Ultrasensitive Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Importance: The diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is primarily based on vitreous fluid analysis, including the recently emerging myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) mutation analysis. Aqueous humor paracentesis is a relatively less invasive and safer procedure than taking vitreous fluid specimens, and aqueous humor-based MYD88 mutation analysis would provide an additional liquid biopsy tool to diagnose and monitor patients with VRL. Objective: To investigate whether the detection of MYD88 L265P by highly sensitive droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is feasible in the vitreous fluid and aqueous humor of patients with VRL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study includes aqueous humor and vitreous fluid samples from patients with VRL who were treated at the University Medical Center Utrecht, in Utrecht, the Netherlands, from August 2005 to August 2017. Ocular fluids were randomized and masked before MYD88 L265P analysis, which was performed using an in-house validated ddPCR platform. Patients with uveitis were included as a comparison group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The presence of MYD88 L265P mutation detected by ddPCR in AH and VF. Results: The study included 96 samples from 63 individuals, including 23 patients with VRL (of whom 10 were female and 13 male, with a mean [SD] age of 72 [7.3] years) and 40 individuals with uveitis (of whom 23 were female and 17 male, with a mean [SD] age of 58 [20.9] years). In 17 of 23 patients with VRL (74%), MYD88 L265P was detected; it was not detected in any of the patients with uveitis. It was detectable in both vitreous fluid and aqueous humor samples. In the paired samples, the mutation was detected in 8 of 9 aqueous humor samples (89%) of the MYD88 L265P-positive vitreous fluid samples. In vitreous fluid, the MYD88 ddPCR test showed a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI, 50%-92%) and a positive predictive value of 100%; in aqueous humor, sensitivity was 67% (95% CI, 42%-92%), and positive predictive value was 100%. Specificity was 100% in both fluids. After treatment, the mutation was no longer detectable in any ocular fluids. Conclusions and Relevance: The high concordance between aqueous humor and vitreous fluid samples suggests that use of the easily accessible aqueous humor is nearly as informative as vitreous fluid in the identification of key somatic mutations in patients with VRL. This approach may provide an additional minimally invasive tool for accurate diagnosis, detection of recurrence, and monitoring of treatment.

Metagenomic deep sequencing of aqueous fluid detects intraocular lymphomas.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, the detection of pathogens or mutations associated with intraocular lymphomas heavily relies on prespecified, directed PCRs. With metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS), an unbiased high-throughput sequencing approach, all pathogens as well as all mutations present in the host's genome can be detected in the same small amount of ocular fluid. METHODS: In this cross-sectional case series, aqueous fluid samples from two patients were submitted to MDS to identify pathogens as well as common and rare cancer mutations. RESULTS: MDS of aqueous fluid from the first patient with vitreal lymphoma revealed the presence of both Epstein-Barr virus (HHV-4/EBV) and human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) RNA. Aqueous fluid from the second patient with intraocular B-cell lymphoma demonstrated a less common mutation in the MYD88 gene associated with B-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSION: MDS detects pathogens that, in some instances, may drive the development of intraocular lymphomas. Moreover, MDS is able to identify both common and rare mutations associated with lymphomas.

Next generation sequencing of vitreoretinal lymphomas from small-volume intraocular liquid biopsies: new routes to targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL), the most common lymphoma of the eye, is a rare form of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Most frequently a high-grade diffuse large B cell lymphoma, VRL can cause vision loss and its prognosis remains dismal: the overall survival time is 3 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are used but remain frequently ineffective, and no standardized treatment regimen exists. Furthermore, no biologically targeted treatments, based on the genetic profile of the tumor, are available, as VRL has hitherto not comprehensively been profiled. To address these unmet needs, we hypothesized that a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based, National Cancer Institute (NCI) MATCH Trial-modified panel would be able to identify actionable genomic alterations from small-volume, intraocular liquid biopsies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this retrospective study, we collected diluted vitreous biopsies from 4 patients with a high suspicion for VRL. Following cytological confirmation of lymphoma (all were diffuse large B cell lymphomas), we subjected genomic DNA from the biopsies to NGS, using a panel containing 126 genes (3,435 amplicons across several hotspots per gene), which was modified from that of the NCI MATCH Trial, a new trial that has matched patients with cancers that have not responded (or never responded), to investigational therapeutics based on their prioritized mutation profile rather than site of tumor origin. Using a validated bioinformatics pipeline, we assessed for the presence of actionable mutations and copy number alterations. In all four small-volume, intraocular liquid biopsies, we obtained sufficient genomic DNA for analysis, even in diluted samples in which the undiluted vitreous was used for cytology and flow cytometry. Using NGS, we found targetable heterozygous gain-of-function mutations in the MYD88 oncogene, and confirmed in our cohort the presence the L265 mutations, previously described using PCR-based assays. For the first time in VRL, we also identified the MYD88 S243N mutation. We also identified two-copy copy number losses in the tumor suppressor CDKN2A in all four cases, and one copy loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN in one sample. In one case, in which vitreous biopsies were originally read as cytologically negative, but which was confirmed as lymphoma when a lesion appeared in the brain two years later, our NGS-based approach detected tumoral DNA in the banked, original liquid biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: We performed the first systematic exploration of the actionable cancer genome in VRL. Our NGS-based approach identified exploitable genomic alterations such as gain-of-function MYD88 oncogene mutations and loss of the tumor suppressor CDKN2A, and thus illuminates new routes to biologically targeted therapies for VRL, a cancer with a dismal prognosis. This precision medicine strategy could be used to nominate novel, targeted therapies in lymphomas and other blinding and deadly ocular, orbital, and ocular adnexal diseases for which few treatments exist.

Diagnostic efficacy of cell block method for vitreoretinal lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a life- and sight-threatening disorder. The aim of this study was to analyze the usefulness of the cell block method for diagnosis of VRL. METHODS: Sixteen eyes in 12 patients with VRL, and 4 eyes in 4 patients with idiopathic uveitis presenting with vitreous opacity were enrolled in this study. Both undiluted vitreous and diluted fluids were isolated during micro-incision vitrectomy. Cell block specimens were prepared in 19 eyes from diluted fluid containing shredding vitreous. These specimens were then submitted for HE staining as well as immunocytological analyses with antibodies against the B-cell marker CD20, the T-cell marker CD3, and cell proliferation marker Ki67. Conventional smear cytology was applied in 14 eyes with VRL using undiluted vitreous samples. The diagnosis of VRL was made based on the results of cytology, concentrations of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-6 in undiluted vitreous, and immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement analysis. RESULTS: Atypical lymphoid cells were identified in 14 out of 15 cell block specimens of VRL (positive rate: 93.3 %), but in 5 out of 14 eyes in conventional smear cytology (positive rate: 35.7 %). Atypical lymphoid cells showed immunoreactivity for CD20 and Ki67. Seven cell block specimens were smear cytology-negative and cell block-positive. The cell block method showed no atypical lymphoid cells in any patient with idiopathic uveitis. CONCLUSIONS: Cell block specimens using diluted vitreous fluid demonstrated a high diagnostic sensitivity and a low pseudo-positive rate for the cytological diagnosis of VRL. The cell block method contributed to clear differentiation between VRL and idiopathic uveitis with vitreous opacity.

High-resolution genomic copy number profiling of primary intraocular lymphoma by single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays.

Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is a rare lymphoma. Because of difficulties in obtaining tissue samples, little is known about the disease's genetic features. In order to clarify these features, we carried out single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping of IOL using genomic DNA extracted from vitreous fluid. We analyzed 33 samples of IOLs consisting of 16 PIOLs, 12 IOLs with a central nervous system (CNS) lesion at diagnosis (IOCNSL), and five secondary IOLs following systemic lymphoma. All were B-cell type. We identified recurrent copy number (CN) gain regions in PIOLs, most frequently on chromosome 1q followed by 18q and 19q. Chromosome 6q was the most frequent loss region. Although these CN gain regions of PIOL were in common with those of IOCNSL, loss of 6q22.33 containing PTPRK and 9p21.3 containing CDKN2A were more frequently deleted in IOCNSL. Large CN loss in 6q was detected in three of four PIOL patients who had early CNS development and short survival periods, whereas long-term survivors did not have such deletions. There was a correlation between gain of the IL-10 gene located on 1q and intravitreal interleukin-10 concentration, which was higher in IOL than in benign uveitis. The results suggest that IOCNSL is a highly malignant form of PIOL that infiltrates into the CNS at an early stage. They also indicate that genetic differences between PIOL and primary CNS lymphoma need to be clarified.