Bulevirtide with or without pegIFNα for patients with compensated chronic hepatitis delta: From clinical trials to real-world studies.

Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) is the most severe form of viral hepatitis, characterised by the greatest increase in risk of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pegylated-interferon-α (pegIFNα), the only off-label therapeutic option, has been available for the last 30 years but is associated with suboptimal response rates and poor tolerability. Among the new treatment strategies under clinical evaluation, the entry inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) is the only one that has received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA); approval was granted in July 2020 for the treatment of adult patients with compensated CHD at a dose of 2 mg daily. Phase II studies and the week 24 interim analysis of a phase III study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this treatment as a monotherapy or combined with pegIFNα. This favourable profile has been confirmed by recent real-world studies performed in Europe. As a long-term monotherapy, BLV has been successfully used to treat patients with advanced compensated cirrhosis. These encouraging yet preliminary findings must be viewed with caution as many critical issues related to this new antiviral strategy are still poorly understood, as summarised in this review. While waiting for new anti-HBV and anti-HDV drugs to become available for combination studies, BLV treatment is currently the only available anti-HDV therapeutic option that might improve the long-term prognosis of difficult-to-manage patients with CHD.

Beyond Pegylated Interferon-Alpha: New Treatments for Hepatitis Delta.

Persistent coinfection with the hepatitis B/D viruses (HDV) represents the most severe form of viral hepatitis. Hepatitis D often leads to liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The current treatment options are limited as only pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNa) has efficacy against HDV. However, treatment response is still unsatisfactory with 25-40% HDV RNA suppression after 1-2 years. In addition, late HDV RNA relapses have been described during long-term follow-up. Fortunately, new treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis delta are now on the horizon. The hepatocyte entry inhibitor bulevirtide (formerly myrcludex B) and the farnesyl transferase inhibitor lonafarnib are currently explored in patients with chronic hepatitis delta in Phase 3 clinical studies. The nucleic acid inhibitor REP-2139-Ca and PEG-IFN-lambda are studied in Phase 2 trials. We here summarize data on the efficacy of these new antiviral drugs and the existing safety data on the treatment of HDV infection.

The NTCP-inhibitor Myrcludex B: Effects on Bile Acid Disposition and Tenofovir Pharmacokinetics.

Myrcludex B acts as a hepatitis B and D virus entry inhibitor blocking the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1). We investigated the effects of myrcludex B on plasma bile acid disposition, tenofovir pharmacokinetics, and perpetrator characteristics on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Twelve healthy volunteers received 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate orally and 10 mg subcutaneous myrcludex B. Myrcludex B increased total plasma bile acid exposure 19.2-fold without signs of cholestasis. The rise in conjugated bile acids was up to 124-fold (taurocholic acid). Coadministration of tenofovir with myrcludex B revealed no relevant changes in tenofovir pharmacokinetics. CYP3A activity slightly but significantly decreased by 29% during combination therapy. Myrcludex B caused an asymptomatic but distinct rise in plasma bile acid concentrations and had no relevant impact on tenofovir pharmacokinetics. Changes in CYP3A activity might be due to alterations in bile acid signaling. Long-term effects of elevated bile acids will require critical evaluation.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin versus extensive azoles in the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections for neutropenia patients with hematological malignancies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Current studies that compare the efficacy and safety of micafungin (MCFG) with that of triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) demonstrate a lack of sufficient evidence and yield conflicting results. To compare the efficacy and safety of MCFG and triazoles in the prevention and treatment of IFIs, we conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS: For the meta-analysis, we systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and relevant database articles for randomized controlled studies published through November 2016. Comparative studies of the efficacy and safety of MCFG versus triazoles in the prevention and treatment of IFIs were selected. Meta-analysis was performed by R software with the "metafor" package. Pooled results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). TSA was adopted to assess the studies' power with TSA version 0.9 beta. RESULTS: Nine current studies were included in the meta-analysis (1049 cases and 959 controls). Pooled trial comparisons indicated that MCFG does have significantly higher treatment success rates (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; p = 0.0205) and reduces the number of overall IFIs (RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; p = 0.0056). However, MCFG demonstrates no difference in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12, p = 0.1624). For the safety evaluation, MCFG had a significantly lower incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25-0.83; p = 0.0105), hepatic impairment (RR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97; p = 0.0363) and premature discontinuation (RR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.76, p = 0.0010). Meta-regression analysis disclosed the correction of mean age and treatment success rates (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, TSA demonstrated sufficient power to show efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment success rate of MCFG is superior to that of triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of IFIs, and correction of the mean patient age demonstrates that efficacy increases as patient age decreases. MCFG appears to be well-tolerated with manageable side effects and lower withdrawal rates. However, additional clinical trials should be conducted on specific drug-related mortality and AEs to gather sufficient evidence on these matters.

Hepatotoxicity of Antimycotics Used for Invasive Fungal Infections: In Vitro Results.

Purpose. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most common cause of liver injury and a serious clinical problem; antimycotics are involved in approximately 3% of all DILI cases. The hepatotoxicity of many drugs, including the antimycotics, is poorly screened in human models. Methods. In a standardized assay the cytotoxicity on hepatocytes of different concentrations (Cmax, 5x Cmax, and 10x Cmax) of the antimycotics used for systemic infections was tested. Anidulafungin (ANI), liposomal amphotericerin B (L-AmB), caspofungin (CASPO), fluconazole (FLUCO), and voriconazole (VORI) were incubated with HepG2/C3A cells. After incubation, the viability of cells (XTT test, LDH release, trypan blue staining), the synthesis of albumin, the cytochrome 1A2 activity, and the cell death (DNA fragmentation) were determined. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analyses. Results. L-AmB, ANI, and CASPO showed a mild hepatotoxicity in the Cmax concentrations. Higher concentrations of anidulafungin led to a severe impairment of hepatocyte viability and function. The azoles FLUCO and VORI had a higher hepatotoxic potential in all concentrations. Conclusion. Antimycotics, especially azoles, used for systemic infections should be given with caution in patient with liver insufficiency or liver failure or high risk for this; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be used. Further studies with this approach are encouraged.

Breaking the Mold: A Review of Mucormycosis and Current Pharmacological Treatment Options.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature for the pathogenesis of mucormycosis, discuss diagnostic strategies, and evaluate the efficacy of polyenes, triazoles, and echinocandins as pharmacological treatment options. DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed using the MESH terms Rhizopus, zygomycetes, zygomycosis, Mucorales and mucormycosis, with search terms amphotericin B, micafungin, anidulafungin, caspofungin, extended infusion amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, combination therapy, triazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, diagnosis, and clinical manifestations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies written in the English language from January 1960 to March 2016 were considered for this review article. All search results were reviewed, and the relevance of each article was determined by the authors independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mucormycosis is a rare invasive fungal infection with an exceedingly high mortality and few therapeutic options. It has a distinct predilection for invasion of endothelial cells in the vascular system, which is likely important in dissemination of disease from a primary focus of infection. Six distinct clinical syndromes can occur in susceptible hosts, including rhino-orbital-cerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, widely disseminated, and miscellaneous infection. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of mucormycosis is typically difficult to make based on imaging studies, sputum culture, bronchoalveolar lavage culture, or needle aspirate. Surgical debridement prior to dissemination of infection improves clinical outcomes. Surgery combined with early, high-dose systemic antifungal therapy yields greater than a 1.5-fold increase in survival rates. The Mucorales are inherently resistant to most widely used antifungal agents. Amphotericin B is appropriate for empirical therapy, whereas posaconazole and isavuconazole are best reserved for de-escalation, refractory cases, or patients intolerant to amphotericin B.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin versus intravenous itraconazole as empirical antifungal therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized, controlled, prospective, multicenter study.

Micafungin, a clinically important echinocandin antifungal drug, needs to be investigated as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia in comparison with azole compounds. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between micafungin and intravenous itraconazole as an empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in hematological malignancies. The antifungal drug (micafungin 100 mg or itraconazole 200 mg IV once daily) was given for high fever that was sustained despite the administration of appropriate antibiotics. Treatment success was determined by composite end points based on breakthrough invasive fungal infection (IFI), survival, premature discontinuation, defervescence, and treatment of baseline fungal infection. Duration of fever, hospital stay, and overall survival (OS) were studied. A total of 153 patients were randomized to receive micafungin or itraconazole. The overall success rate was 7.1 % point higher in the micafungin group (64.4 vs. 57.3 %, p = 0.404), satisfying the statistical criteria for the non-inferiority of micafungin. The duration of fever and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the micafungin group (6 vs. 7 days, p = 0.014; 22 vs. 27 days, p = 0.033, respectively). Grade 3 adverse events including hyperbilirubinemia (2 vs. 7), elevation of transaminase levels (2 vs. 4), electrolyte imbalance (1 vs. 2), atrial fibrillation (1 vs. 0), and anaphylaxis (1 vs. 0) occurred in 7 and 13 patients in the micafungin (10.4 %) and itraconazole (18.8 %) groups, respectively. Micafungin, when compared with itraconazole, had favorably comparable success rate and toxicity profiles on febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies. In addition, it showed superior effect on shortening the hospital stay.

Safety and Efficacy of Intermittent Intravenous Administration of High-Dose Micafungin.

BACKGROUND: The use of mold-active azoles for antifungal prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is hindered by adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Higher doses of echinocandins administered intermittently may be an alternative in this setting. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational 5-year study to characterize the safety and efficacy of intermittent administration of high-dose intravenous micafungin (≥5 doses of ≥300 mg micafungin 2-3 times weekly) in patients with acute leukemia and allogeneic SCT recipients. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (84 allogeneic SCT recipients and 20 patients with leukemia) received intermittent high-dose intravenous micafungin, 83 (79.8%) as prophylaxis. Large variability in the micafungin dosing regimen was observed; 78 (75%) patients received >75% of their course as 300 mg micafungin 3 times weekly. Liver function tests decreased from baseline to end of treatment (EOT; P < .001). Patients with normal baseline liver function (n = 55 [52%]) maintained similar enzyme levels throughout the study. For patients with abnormal baseline liver function (n = 49 [47%]), liver function tests significantly improved from baseline to EOT (P ≤ .005). Duration and/or micafungin dosing algorithms were not associated with liver toxicity at EOT. There were no significant changes in renal function, and infusion-related reactions or deaths were not observed. Five of 83 (6.0%) patients in the prophylaxis group developed a breakthrough fungal infection. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest cohort of patients to date, intermittent administration of high-dose micafungin was well tolerated, without any associated liver or renal function abnormalities, and may be considered an alternative antifungal prophylactic strategy. Prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Safety and Effectiveness of Micafungin in Japanese Pediatric Patients: Results of a Postmarketing Surveillance Study.

Limited data are available about the safety and efficacy of micafungin in children. A postmarketing surveillance study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of micafungin, an echinocandin antifungal, in pediatric patients. A prospective multicenter postmarketing observational study was carried out between October 2006 and September 2008 in Japan. Pediatric patients under 16 years received an intravenous infusion of micafungin at a dose of 1 mg/kg for candidiasis and 1 to 3 mg/kg for aspergillosis, with the option of increasing the dose if required to 6 mg/kg once daily. All adverse events were recorded. A total of 201 pediatric patients were enrolled. There were 55 adverse drug reactions reported among 42 of 190 patients evaluated for safety (22.1%); the most frequently reported adverse drug reaction was hepatobiliary disorders. No adverse drug reactions were reported in 18 neonates (aged below 4 wk). The overall clinical response rate in 91 patients evaluated for efficacy was 86.8%. The response rate in neonates was 90.0%, and there were no differences in the response rate by age. Micafungin was found to have sufficient safety and effectiveness for the treatment of fungal infections in pediatric patients with various backgrounds.

Safety and efficacy of micafungin for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in Japanese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A prospective multicenter post-marketing observational surveillance study was conducted from July 2007 to June 2010 to assess the safety and efficacy of micafungin, an echinocandin antifungal, for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in Japanese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Among 241 patients evaluated for safety, 143 adverse drug reactions were reported in 86 patients (35.7%), with hepatobiliary disorders the most frequently reported adverse drug reactions. The success rate for prophylaxis at the end of observation was 72.8% (131/180 patients), and the incidence of breakthrough infections was only 4.4% (8/180 patients). In conclusion, micafungin had sufficient safety and efficacy for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in Japanese patients with various backgrounds undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Micafungin twice weekly as antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric patients at high risk for invasive fungal disease.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend antifungal prophylaxis for children at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD), but the use of polyenes and triazoles may not be feasible in some patients due to toxicities and drug-drug interactions. Micafungin is well tolerated, with intravenous daily dosing being the current standard. Recent reports indicate safety and efficacy of intermittent dosing of micafungin. METHODS: We analysed safety, efficacy and micafungin serum concentrations of children at high risk for IFD receiving prophylactic micafungin between 3 and 4 mg/kg twice weekly. All children were intolerant or had contraindications to polyenes and triazoles. RESULTS: A total of 21 children (median age = 9 years) at high risk for IFD were included in the analysis. No significant clinical adverse event occurred, and end of treatment values of parameters of renal and hepatic function in serum were not different from baseline. Proven or probable breakthrough IFD did not occur in any of the patients. In 9 out of 11 patients in whom plasma micafungin concentrations were assessed, the first trough concentration exceeded 150 ng/mL, a concentration proposed to be effective for prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that micafungin administered twice weekly at a dosage of 3-4 mg/kg of bodyweight could be a convenient, safe and efficient alternative for antifungal prophylaxis in children at high risk for IFD.

Pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of repeated-dose prophylactic micafungin in children and adolescents undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Micafungin is a potent echinocandin antifungal that can be used for both prophylaxis and treatment of Candida infections. This open-label study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of prophylactic micafungin in children and adolescents (aged 4 mo to 16 y) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients received once-daily doses of either 1 or 1.5 mg/kg micafungin, based on their body weight, for 10 to 14 days. In total, 40 patients received micafungin. Area under the plasma micafungin concentration-time curve was highest in patients aged 6 to 11 years in the 1.5 mg/kg treatment group. Peak plasma micafungin concentration displayed no age-related differences, but was higher in the 1.5 mg/kg versus the 1 mg/kg group. Clearance at steady state by weight and volume of distribution by weight were considerably higher in patients aged 4 months to 5 years. Results from this study show that age and body weight affect micafungin pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Randomized trial of micafungin for the prevention of invasive fungal infection in high-risk liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) following liver transplant is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Antifungal prophylaxis is rational for liver transplant patients at high IFI risk. METHODS: In this open-label, noninferiority study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous micafungin 100 mg or center-specific standard care (fluconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, or caspofungin) posttransplant. The primary endpoint was clinical success (absence of a proven/probable IFI and no need for additional antifungals) at end of prophylaxis (EOP). Noninferiority (10% margin) of micafungin vs standard care was assessed in the per protocol and full analysis sets. Safety assessments included adverse events and liver and kidney function tests. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 344 patients (172 micafungin; 172 standard care). Mean age was 51.2 years; 48.0% had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥20. At EOP (mean treatment duration, 17 days), clinical success was 98.6% for micafungin and 99.3% for standard care (Δ standard care - micafungin [95% confidence interval], 0.7% [-2.7% to 4.4%]) in the per protocol set and 96.5% and 93.6%, respectively (-2.9% [-8.0% to 1.9%]), in the full analysis set. Incidences of drug-related adverse events for micafungin and standard care were 11.6% and 16.3%, leading to discontinuation in 6.4% and 11.6% of cases, respectively. At EOP, liver function tests were similar but creatinine clearance was higher in micafungin- vs standard care-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Micafungin was noninferior to standard care as antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients at high risk for IFI. Adverse event profiles and liver function at EOP were similar, although kidney function was better with micafungin. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01058174.

Different doses of micafungin for prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in hemato-oncological high-risk patients: a web-based non-interventional trial in four large university hospitals in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment indications of new antifungals in clinical practice often deviate from the strict criteria used in controlled clinical trials. Under routine clinical conditions, beneficial and adverse effects, not previously described in clinical trials may be observed. The aim of this study was to describe customary prescription and treatment strategies of micafungin (MCFG). METHODS: A registry was set up on www.ClinicalSurveys.net and physicians were invited to provide retrospective information on cases they had treated with MCFG. Documentation comprised demographic information, underlying disease, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of MCFG. RESULTS: A total of 125 episodes of patients hospitalized between September 2009 and February 2012 were documented, of which 7 had to be excluded because of incomplete documentation. The most common risk factors of patients were hematological malignancy (n = 116, 98.3%) and antibiotic treatment >3 days (n = 115, 97.5%). MCFG was administered as prophylaxis in 106 (89.9%) patients. Median duration of MCFG application as prophylaxis was 21 days (range: 3-78); 53 of the patients (50%) received a dose of 50 mg, while the other 53 (50%) received 100 mg/day. For the different doses, prophylactic outcome was rated as success in 42 (79.2%) vs. 52 (98.1%; P = 0.004) patients. Fifty-five patients (51.9%) were treated with posaconazole before initiation of MCFG. Four patients (7.5%) developed a proven invasive fungal disease (IFD) while being treated with 50 mg MCFG, compared to no patient treated with 100 mg (P = 0.118). At the end of MCFG prophylaxis, 24 (22.6%) patients were switched to fluconazole and 64 (60.3%) patients to posaconazole. CONCLUSION: Our study shows clinical effectiveness of MCFG prophylaxis with low rates of breakthrough fungal infections. In most cases, MCFG was part of a multi-modal antifungal prophylactic strategy. Investigators reported fewer proven IFDs in patients receiving therapeutic doses of MCFG as prophylaxis.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection during neutropenia in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prevention of invasive fungal infection (IFI) during the neutropenic phase of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) in children and adolescents. This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. Micafungin was administered i.v. at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (max 50 mg) from the beginning of conditioning until neutrophil engraftment. Treatment success was defined as the absence of proven, probable, possible or suspected IFI through to 4 weeks after therapy. From April 2010 to December 2011, 155 patients were enrolled from 11 institutions in Korea, and 147 patients were analyzed. Of the 147 patients, 121 (82.3%) completed the protocol without premature interruption. Of the 132 patients in whom micafungin efficacy could be evaluated, treatment success was achieved in 119 patients (90.2%). There was no proven fungal infection in any patient. The number of patients with probable, possible and suspected IFI was two, two and nine, respectively. Thirty-five patients (23.8%) experienced 109 adverse events (AEs) possibly related to micafungin. No patients experienced grade IV AEs. Two patients (1.4%) discontinued micafungin administration due to adverse effects. None of the deaths were related to the study drug.

Micafungin in premature and non-premature infants: a systematic review of 9 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections cause excessive morbidity and mortality in premature neonates and severely ill infants. METHODS: Safety and efficacy outcomes of micafungin were compared between prematurely and non-prematurely born infants <2 years of age. Data were obtained from all completed phase I-III clinical trials with micafungin that had enrolled infants (<2 years of age) that were listed in the Astellas Clinical Study Database. Demographics, adverse events, hepatic function tests and treatment success data were extracted and validated by the Astellas biostatistical group for all micafungin-treated patients, <2 years of age, using the unique patient identifier. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients included in 9 clinical trials, 48% premature [birth weight (BW) <2500 g and/or gestational age <37 weeks], 52% non-premature, received ≥ 1 dose of micafungin. Among premature patients, 14.5% were low BW (1500-2499 g), 36.4% very low BW (1000-1499 g) and 49.1% extremely low BW (<1000 g). Ninety patients (78%) completed the studies; 13 [11% (4 premature)] died. Significantly more non-premature than premature patients discontinued treatment (P = 0.003). Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 23% of patients with no difference between groups. More extremely low BW (n = 4, 15%) and very low BW (n = 8, 40%) infants experienced treatment-related adverse events than low BW (n = 0) and there was no relation to micafungin dose or duration. For a subgroup of 30 patients with invasive candidiasis, treatment success was achieved in 73% in both premature and non-premature groups. Prophylaxis was successful in 4/5 non-premature hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. CONCLUSION: Micafungin has a safe profile in premature and non-premature infants with substantial efficacy.

Hyperbilirubinemia complicating plasma-free hemoglobin and antifactor Xa level monitoring on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Optical spectrophotometric methods are used to detect both plasma-free hemoglobin and antifactor Xa level, so hyperbilirubinemia can interfere with the measurement of both the monitoring laboratory tests for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to similar absorbance wavelengths. We present a seven-year-old child with acute respiratory failure on venovenous ECMO who developed an acute increase in plasma-free hemoglobin and undetectable antifactor Xa level due to acute hyperbilirubinemia from hepatic dysfunction related to antifungal therapy.

Safety, tolerability, and feasibility of antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin at 2 mg/kg daily in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Micafungin (MCFG) is used for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the safety, efficacy, or optimal dosage/blood levels as prophylaxis is uncertain in pediatric HSCT-patients. METHODS: We prophylactically administered MCFG at 2 mg/kg once daily to 38 children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic HSCT. RESULTS: During MCFG prophylaxis, infusion reactions or adverse events (grades 2-5) related to MCFG use were not found in all the patients. Thus, MCFG prophylaxis was not discontinued and other antifungal agents were not added except for 2 patients in whom probable or possible IFDs developed (completion rate, 94.7 %). To elucidate the influence of HSCT-related complications/drugs on blood concentration of MCFG, we determined the plasma trough and peak levels in 13 and 10 among 38 patients, respectively. The mean trough and peak levels were 3.04 ± 1.21 µg/mL (569 samples) and 9.63 ± 3.62 µg/mL (44 samples), respectively. The peak levels were moderately correlated to the trough levels (R (2) = 0.466). In a patient, the trough level of MCFG transiently increased up to 10.21 µg/mL during hepatic dysfunction due to acute graft-versus-host disease. The MCFG trough levels strongly correlated with T-Bil value (R (2) = 0.894). There was no relationship between the trough levels of MCFG and the circulating concentrations of tacrolimus (R (2) = 0.040). Additionally, MCFG levels were not influenced by treatment with cyclophosphamide or corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with MCFG at 2 mg/kg once daily may be safe, tolerable, and feasible in pediatric HSCT-patients.

Safety of high-dose micafungin for patients with hematological diseases.

This study was conducted as a retrospective, observational, exploratory cohort study with the aim of elucidating the safety profile of micafungin at doses exceeding 150 mg daily. We identified adult patients with hematological diseases who had received micafungin therapy for ≥ 7 consecutive days. Twenty-six patients administered micafungin at 300 mg daily (high-dose group) were compared with 58 patients administered micafungin at 150 mg daily (standard-dose group). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were hepatotoxicity, hypertension and diarrhea. AEs were recorded in 42 (72%) and 19 (73%) patients in the standard-dose and high-dose groups, respectively (p = 1.00). Hepatobiliary AEs were noted in 28 (48%) and 15 (58%) patients, respectively (p = 0.48). Serious AEs and resultant treatment discontinuation were infrequent. Our results suggest that micafungin was safe and well tolerated at 300 mg daily.

Micafungin versus amphotericin B lipid complex for the prevention of invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding echinocandins as antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of targeted prophylaxis with micafungin or amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) was assessed in a sequential cohort of high-risk patients (posttransplantation dialysis, retransplantation, or reoperation) and compared with those without high risk who did not receive prophylaxis. Outcomes were assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: Micafungin versus ABLC recipients were older (P=0.0065) and more likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (P=0.025). High-risks, that is, dialysis (55.6% vs. 79.2%), retransplantation (5.6% vs. 12.5%), and reoperation (38.9% vs. 20.8%) did not differ between the two groups. Invasive fungal infections developed in 11.1% (2 of 18) of micafungin recipients, 8.3% (2 of 24) of ABLC recipients, and 3% (7 of 234) of patients without high risks (P=0.12). In nondialyzed patients, ABLC versus micafungin recipients had significantly higher serum creatinine on day 14 (P=0.04). However, renal and hepatic function, rejection, graft loss, and mortality did not differ for the two groups on day 90. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted prophylaxis with micafungin or ABLC decreased the risk of mycoses in high-risk recipients compared with that in low-risk recipients. Compared with ABLC, however, micafungin appeared to be associated with lower early-renal dysfunction and no additional risk of hepatic dysfunction.