Validation of age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index for assessing adjacent-segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery: minimum 5 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of sagittal alignment according to age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) and lordosis distribution index (LDI) on the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic (preoperative and 3-month postoperative) data were collected and compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate adjusted associations between potential variables and ASD development. A subanalysis was further conducted to assess their relationships in the range of different PI values. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months (range 60-121 months), 118 patients (50.4%) were diagnosed as having cranial radiological ASD. Univariate analyses showed that older age, 2-level fusion, worse preoperative pelvic tilt and LL, lower pre- and postoperative LDI, and more improvement in sagittal vertical axis were significantly correlated with the occurrence of ASD. No significant differences in the PI-LL and age-adjusted PI-LL (offset) were detected between ASD and non-ASD groups. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative LDI (OR 0.971, 95% CI 0.953-0.989, p = 0.002); 2-level fusion (OR 3.477, 95% CI 1.964-6.157, p < 0.001); and improvement of sagittal vertical axis (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p = 0.039) as the independent variables for predicting the occurrence of ASD. When stratified by PI, LDI was identified as an independent risk factor in the groups with low and average PI. Lower segmental lordosis (OR 0.841, 95% CI 0.742-0.954, p = 0.007) could significantly increase the incidence of ASD in the patients with high LDI. CONCLUSIONS: Age-adjusted PI-LL may have limited ability to predict the development of ASD. LDI could exert an important effect on diagnosing the occurrence of ASD in the cases with low and average PI, but segmental lordosis was a more significant risk factor than LDI in individuals with high PI.

Variation in Lumbar Shape and Lordosis in a Large Asymptomatic Population: A MEANS Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between lumbar shape and sagittal parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding the lumbar shape is vital for deformity surgery. Normative sagittal parameters and spine shape remain unstudied in large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional cohort of 468 asymptomatic volunteers between 18 and 80 years was enrolled across 5 countries. Demographic data and radiographic parameters such as pelvic incidence (PI) were collected. Pearson correlation test and linear regression were used to find the relationship between lumbar lordosis (LL) and other parameters. One-way analysis of variance and Welch 2-sample t test were performed to compare lumbar shape across such categories as PI and lumbar apex followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction if needed. RESULTS: PI was moderately correlated with proximal lumbar lordosis (pLL) ( r = -0.54) and weakly correlated with distal lumbar lordosis (dLL) ( r = -0.16). Thoracic kyphosis (T1-T12) was moderately correlated with pLL ( r = -0.35) and dLL ( r = -0.29). dLL was moderately correlated with LL ( r = 0.64). 2.6% (12/468) of subjects had lumbar apex at L2, 40.2% (188/468) at L3, 56.6% at L4 (265/468), and 0.6% (3/468) at other levels. Mean PI was different between volunteers with the apex at L3 and L4. A lower mean PI was associated with the apex at L4 (49.0°), whereas a higher mean PI was associated with the apex at L3 (55.8°). The mean PI-LL mismatch for volunteers was -5.4° with a range from -35° to 39.7°. PI-LL mismatch increased from a mean of -10.1° in volunteers with low PI to a mean of 2.2° in volunteers with high PI. Age was not correlated with LL ( P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic adult volunteers, pLL showed a moderate correlation with PI and increased with PI, whereas dLL showed a weak correlation. The lumbar apex migrated proximally with increasing PI. Segmental lordosis and apex position instead of solely global lordosis should be emphasized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Quantitative evaluation of correlation between lumbosacral lordosis and pelvic incidence in standing position among asymptomatic Asian adults: a prospective study.

The determination of lumbopelvic alignment is essential for planning adult spinal deformity surgery and for ensuring favorable surgical outcomes. This prospective study investigated the correlation between the lumbar section of lumbar spine lordosis and increasing pelvic incidence in 324 Asian adults with a mean age of 55 ± 13 years (range: 20-80 years), comprising 115 male and 209 female volunteers. Participants were divided into three groups based on pelvic incidence (G1, G2, and G3 had pelvic incidence of < 45°, 45-55°, and ≥ 55°, respectively). We determined that distal and proximal lumbar lordosis contributed differentially to the increase in pelvic incidence, whereas the lordosis ratio of the L3-L4 and L4-L5 segments mostly remained constant. The mean contribution ratio of the segmental lordosis from L1 to S1 was as follows: L1-L2, 2.3%; L2-L3, 11.7%; L3-L4, 18.1%; L4-L5, 25.2%; and L5-S1, 42.7%. Pelvic incidence had a stronger correlation with proximal lumbar lordosis than did distal lumbar lordosis. The ratios of proximal lumbar lordosis to distal lumbar lordosis were 37.8% in G1, 45.8% in G2, and 55.9% in G3. These findings serve as a reference for future lumbar spine correction or fusion surgery for Asian adults.

Correlation between lordosis distribution index, lordosis tilt, and occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative reciprocal progression of Lordosis tilt (LT), Lordosis distribution index (LDI) and occurrence of Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following surgery for Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). METHODS: A total of 122 consecutive patients with ADS were treated with correction of deformity and followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Oswestry Disability Index, and visual analog scale scores were measured at the latest follow-up. Associations between LT, LDI, and PJK were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of PJK in the present study was 24.6%. The outcomes of patients with PJK were significantly worse than those of patients without PJK. Postoperative reciprocal progression in LT and LDI with lumbar lordosis restorative surgery was observed. Preoperative risk factors for PJK were older age, larger LT, and larger Cobb angle of the curves. Postoperative risk factors for PJK included postoperative LT and postoperative Cobb angle of the curves, which were smaller than those preoperatively. We found a strong correlation between postoperative LT and Cobb angle of the curves resulting in PJK. Patients with LT < - 8° were at a higher risk of PJK. CONCLUSIONS: LT can be used to predict the occurrence of PJK in patients undergoing surgery for DLS. Appropriate postoperative LT is crucial for preventing the progression of PJK.

Large Lumbar Lordosis Is a Risk Factor for Lumbar Spondylolysis in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center, observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and the characteristics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with concomitant lumbar spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence and features of lumbar spondylolysis in patients with AIS are unclear. METHODS: We included 357 patients with AIS who underwent correction and fusion surgery. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used to assess the existence of lumbar spondylolysis. Cobb angles of the curves, parameters of spinal alignment, Lenke classification, and the presence of low back pain were compared between patients with and without spondylolysis. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 6.1% had lumbar spondylolysis. They had significantly greater lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) than those without lumbar spondylolysis. Logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that LL was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 1.059; 95% confidence interval: 1.018-1.103; P = 0.005) of associating lumbar spondylolysis with a cut off value of 56.5 degrees (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.689; sensitivity = 63.6%, specificity = 71.0%). CONCLUSION: We should be vigilant for lumbar spondylolysis in AIS patients whose LL and SS are large, especially with LL larger than 56.5°.Level of Evidence: 3.

Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis is the Key Sagittal Plane Determinant of Patient Outcome at Minimum 40 Years After Instrumented Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: Assess measures of spinal-pelvic balance in predicting functional outcome in patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at minimum 40-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain and long-term function are considered when choosing levels for surgery in AIS patients. Three hundred and fourteen patients underwent fusion for AIS between 1961 and 1977. One hundred and thirty-four patients were located for potential long-term follow-up. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, medical records and public resources were used to locate patients. Patients completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and returned for assessment including full radiographs. Radiographs were analyzed for scoliosis measures, and recognized spinal-pelvic measures including the lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt (PT). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between spinal-pelvic measures and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 134 patients agreed to return for complete HRQoL and radiographic follow-up. There were no differences at baseline between those agreeing and declining participation. The cohort was 94% female, had an average age of 60.5 years, and average follow-up of 46 years. In bivariate analysis, pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference (PI-LL) was the only spinal-pelvic parameter which statistically discriminated between patients doing well and not, as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index and the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Fatigue instruments. In multivariable analysis, (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with worse scores in PROMIS-Pain Interference, Physical Function, Depression, Fatigue, Social Function and the total Oswestry score. An SVA > 50 mm was associated with worse scores in the Scoliosis Research Society-7. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of 35 patients with average follow-up of 46 years after posterior spinal instrumentation with Harrington rods (PSIF) for AIS, spinal-pelvic mismatch as identified by (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with inferior HRQoL outcomes. Other spinal-pelvic measures (SVA and PT) were not reliably associated with inferior HRQoL.Level of Evidence: 4.

Pelvic incidence change on the operating table.

PURPOSE: While a change in the pelvic incidence (PI) after long spine fusion surgery has been reported, no studies have examined the change in the PI on the operating table. The present study examined the PI-change on the operating table and elucidated the patients' background characteristics associated with this phenomenon. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent lumbar posterior spine surgery and had radiographs taken in a full-standing position preoperatively and a pelvic lateral radiograph in the prone position in the operative room. The patients with PI-change on the operating table (PICOT; PICOT group) and without PICOT (control group) were compared for their background characteristics and preoperative radiographic parameters. RESULTS: There were 128 eligible patients (62 males, 66 females) with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 69.9 ± 11.7 (range: 25-93) years old. Sixteen patients (12.5%) showed a decrease in the PI > 10°, which indicated placement in the PICOT group. The preoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and PI-LL in the PICOT group were significantly worse than those in the control group (LL: 20.8 ± 16.6 vs. 30.6 ± 16.2, p = 0.0251, PI-LL: 33.9 ± 19.0 vs. 17.3 ± 14.8, p < 0.0001). The PICOT group had a higher proportion of patients who underwent fusion surgery than the control group, but the difference was not significant (62.5% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1799). CONCLUSION: A decreased PI was observed in some patients who underwent lumbar posterior surgery on the operating table before surgery. Patients with a PI decrease on the operating table had a significantly worse preoperative global alignment than those without such a decrease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Analysis of apex and transitional vertebra of the spine according to pelvic incidence using orientation and position parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the different apex and transitional vertebra according to the shape of the pelvis of individuals despite their difference in sagittal alignment using our measurement system. METHODS: Full-spine X-rays using EOS in standard stand-position of 99 volunteers were selected (47 women, 52 men, mean age 31 years old). Validated 3D reconstruction technique allows extraction of spinopelvic parameters, and position and rotation of each vertebra and lumbar disks. Subjects were divided into three groups: low PI (lowPI, n = 37), moderate PI (midPI, n = 52), high PI (highPI, n = 10), with, respectively, a PI below 45°, between 45° and 60° and above 60°. Occurrence of specific position and rotation values of apex and transitional vertebra were assessed in each group. RESULTS: Frequency curves tend to move cranially when the incidence increases except in cervicothoracic where T1 is a constant for all shapes of spine with occurrence approaching 90%. Angulation value of relevant vertebra and lumbar lordosis are significantly positively correlated for the whole population. CONCLUSIONS: Our study allowed the assessment of the distribution of spine curvatures according to the pelvic incidence. It describes the occurrence of localization of the apex and transitional vertebrae according to pelvic incidence. These results should be taken into account during the analysis of the sagittal balance, especially when planning deformity surgery in adults.

A Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 52 patients diagnosed with CSM who underwent either laminoplasty (LP group) or laminectomy with fusion (LF group). The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cobb?s angle of cervical lordosis, visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, and radiographs showing the antero-posterior diameter and area of the spinal canal. RESULTS: The mean age of the LP group was 60.12 years, while that of the LF group was 63.84 years. The pre- and postoperative mean mJOA scores were 11.46 ± 1.27 and 15.27 ± 0.87, respectively, in the LP group and 10.15 ± 1.89 and 14.92 ± 1.23, respectively, in the LF group. The pre- and postoperative Cobb angles were 16.22 ± 6.36° and 14.45 ± 4.50°, respectively, in the LP group and 14.39 ± 5.34° and 15.10 ± 6.21°, respectively, in the LF group. Recovery rates were 58.26% and 60.76% in the LP and LF groups, respectively. The mJOA scores, antero-posterior diameter and area improved significantly after surgery in both groups, while the Cobb angle increased in the LF group and decreased in the LP group. CONCLUSION: Laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion improved neurological functions in patients diagnosed with CSM. Laminectomy with fusion should be the preferred choice when treating patients with preoperative axial pain as, despite expanding the spinal canal successfully, laminoplasty can also worsen the pain. However, laminectomy with fusion (except for OPLL) should not be the treatment of choice in a mobile spine as it severely restricts neck movements and impairs the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of the patient. In the absence of kyphotic deformity, laminoplasty should be the preffered method for treatment.

Pelvic incidence correlates to sagittal spinal morphology in lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and influences the proximal junctional kyphosis rate after correction surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pelvic incidence and sagittal spinal morphology in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its impact on the proximal junctional kyphosis rate after surgery. METHODS: The study enrolled a total of 52 cases of Lenke 5 AIS between September 2009 and December 2018. Sagittal spinal morphological parameters, pelvic incidence (PI) and the proximal junctional angle were measured on full-length spinal standing lateral x-ray films preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to reveal the relationship between sagittal spinal morphology and PI. Multivariable regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). RESULTS: A correlation was found between PI and sagittal spinal morphological parameters, but not between PI and lumbar lordosis. The PJK rate after surgery was 23% (12/52). PI was revealed as an independent risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis according to multivariable regression analysis (OR = 0.902, p = 0.049). Both multivariable regression analysis and ROC curve analysis verified that restoring a rational postoperative PI-LL/PLL relationship reduced the rate of PJK, including PI-LL mismatch (OR = 0.743, p = 0.046; cutoff value = - 15.5°), the LL-PI ratio (OR = 5.756, p = 0.021; cutoff value = 1.09), and the PLL-PI ratio (OR = 2.116, p = 0.016; cutoff value = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: PI influences sagittal spinal morphology in Lenke 5 AIS, although it does not show an inherent relationship with lumbar lordosis. PI also correlates to the PJK rate after surgery. Restoring an ideal postoperative PI-LL relationship could decrease the PJK rate.

Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Surgical Deformity Correction in Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJK is a common cause of reoperation in adult deformity but has been less well reported in pediatric NMS. METHODS: Sixty consecutive pediatric patients underwent spinal fusion for NMS with a minimum 2-year follow-up. PJK was defined as >10° increase between the inferior end plate of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the superior end plate of the vertebra two segments above. Regression analyses as well as binary correlational models and Student t tests were employed for further statistical analysis assessing variables of primary and compensatory curve magnitudes, thoracic kyphosis, proximal kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic obliquity, shoulder imbalance, Risser classification, and sagittal profile. RESULTS: The present cohort consisted of 29 boys and 31 girls with a mean age at surgery of 14 ±â€Š2.7 years. The most prevalent diagnoses were spinal cord injury (23%) and cerebral palsy (20%). Analysis reflected an overall radiographic PJK rate of 27% (n = 16) and a proximal junctional failure rate of 7% (n = 4). No significant association was identified with previously suggested risk factors such as extent of rostral fixation (P = 0.750), rod metal type (P = 0.776), laminar hooks (P = 0.654), implant density (P = 0.386), nonambulatory functional status (P = 0.254), or pelvic fixation (P = 0.746). Significant risk factors for development of PJK included perioperative use of halo gravity traction (38%, P = 0.029), greater postoperative C2 sagittal translation (P = 0.030), decreased proximal kyphosis preoperatively (P = 0.002), and loss of correction of primary curve magnitude at follow-up (P = 0.047). Increase in lumbar lordosis from post-op to last follow-up trended toward significance (P = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven percent of patients with NMS developed PJK, and 7% had revision surgery. Those treated with halo gravity traction or with greater postoperative C2 sagittal translation, loss of primary curve correction, and smaller preoperative proximal kyphosis had the greatest risk of developing PJK.Level of Evidence: 4.

Predictive formula of cervical lordosis in asymptomatic young population.

BACKGROUND: Not a large number of previous studies have reported the normal sagittal balance of the cervical spine and physiological cervical lordosis (CL) has not been clearly defined yet. METHODS: This was a prospective radiological analysis of asymptomatic subjects. The following cervical sagittal parameters were measured: CL, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope (T1S), neck tilt (NT), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). The Pearson correlation test was calculated, and the stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted by using the CL (dependent variable) and the other cervical sagittal parameters (independent variables) to determine the best sets of predictors. A paired sample t test was conducted between the predicted and measured values. RESULTS: The mean age of 307 participants was 24.54 + 3.07. The mean CL, TIA, T1S, NT, and C2-C7 SVA was 17.11° ± 6.31°, 67.87° ± 7.78°, 25.84° ± 5.36°, 42.53° ± 6.68°, and 14.60 ± 8.20 mm, respectively. The formula was established as follows: CL = 0.762 × T1S - 0.392 × C2-C7 SVA + 0.25 × TIA - 13.795 (R = 0.812, R2 = 0.660) (stepwise multiple regression) and CL = 0.417 × TIA - 11.193 (R = 0.514, R2 = 0.264) (simple linear regression). There was no statistical difference between the predicted CL and the measured CL (t = 0.034, P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant correlation between CL and other cervical sagittal parameters, including TIA, T1S, NT, and C2-C7 SVA in asymptomatic Chinese population. The results of this study may serve as a normal reference value for the study of asymptomatic population.

Prevalence of Sagittal Spinal Deformity Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The important relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming well recognized. Prior research has shown a significant relationship between sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) and THA instability. This study aims at determining the prevalence of SSD among preoperative THA patients. METHODS: A multicenter database of preoperative THA patients was analyzed. Radiographic parameters measured from standing radiographs included anterior pelvic plane tilt, spinopelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis (LL); pelvic incidence (PI) was measured from computed tomography scans. Lumbar flatback was defined as PI-LL mismatch >10°, balanced as PI-LL of -10° to 10°, and hyperlordosis as PI-LL <-10°. RESULTS: A total of 1088 patients were analyzed (mean, 64 years; 48% female). And 59% (n = 644) of patients had balanced alignment, 16% (n = 174) had a PI-LL > 10°, and 4% (n = 46) had a PI-LL > 20° (severe flatback deformity). The prevalence of hyperlordosis was 25% (n = 270). Flatback patients tended to be older than balanced and hyperlordotic patients (69.5 vs 64.0 vs 60.8 years, P < .001). Spinopelvic tilt was more posterior in flatback compared to balanced and hyperlordotic patients (24.7° vs 15.4° vs 7.0°) as was anterior pelvic plane tilt (-7.1° vs -2.0° vs 2.5°) and PI (64.1° vs 56.8° vs 49.0°), all P < .001. CONCLUSION: Only 59% of patients undergoing THA have normally aligned lumbar spines. Flatback SSD was observed in 16% (4% with severe flatback deformity) and there was a 25% prevalence of hyperlordosis. Lumbar flatback was associated with increasing age, posterior pelvic tilt, and larger PI. The relatively high prevalence of spinal deformity in this population reinforces the importance of considering spinopelvic alignment in THA planning and risk stratification.

Does Patient Frailty Status Influence Recovery Following Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?: An Analysis of Patients With 3-Year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate postop clinical recovery among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients between frailty states undergoing primary procedures SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Frailty severity may be an important determinant for impaired recovery after corrective surgery. METHODS: It included ASD patients with health-related quality of life (HRQLs) at baseline (BL), 1 year (1Y), and 3 years (3Y). Patients stratified by frailty by ASD-frailty index scale 0-1(no frailty: <0.3 [NF], mild: 0.3-0.5 [MF], severe: >0.5 [SF]). Demographics, alignment, and SRS-Schwab modifiers were assessed with χ/paired t tests to compare HRQLs: Scoliosis Research Society 22-question Questionnaire (SRS-22), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Back/Leg Pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) method generated normalized HRQL scores at baseline (BL) and f/u intervals (1Y, 3Y). AUC was calculated for each f/u, and total area was divided by cumulative f/u, generating one number describing recovery (Integrated Health State [IHS]). RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included (59 years, 80% females). Breakdown of patients by frailty status: 43.6% NF, 40.8% MF, 15.6% SF. SF patients were older (P = 0.003), >body mass index (P = 0.002). MF and SF were significantly (P < 0.001) more malaligned at BL: pelvic tilt (NF: 21.6°; MF: 27.3°; SF: 22.1°), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (7.4°, 21.2°, 19.7°), sagittal vertical axis (31 mm, 87 mm, 82 mm). By SRS-Schwab, NF were mostly minor (40%), and MF and SF markedly deformed (64%, 57%). Frailty groups exhibited BL to 3Y improvement in SRS-22, ODI, NRS Back/Leg (P < 0.001). After HRQL normalization, SF had improvement in SRS-22 at year 1 and year 3 (P < 0.001), and NRS Back at 1Y. 3Y IHS showed a significant difference in SRS-22 (NF: 1.2 vs. MF: 1.32 vs. SF: 1.69, P < 0.001) and NRS Back Pain (NF: 0.52, MF: 0.66, SF: 0.6, P = 0.025) between frailty groups. SF had more complications (79%). SF/marked deformity had larger invasiveness score (112) compared to MF/moderate deformity (86.2). Controlling for baseline deformity and invasiveness, SF showed more improvement in SRS-22 IHS (NF: 1.21, MF: 1.32, SF: 1.66, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although all frailty groups exhibited improved postop disability/pain scores, SF patients recovered better in SRS-22 and NRS Back. Despite SF patients having more complications and larger invasiveness scores, they had overall better patient-reported outcomes, signifying that with frailty severity, patients have more room for improvement postop compared to BL quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Anatomical sacral slope, a new pelvic parameter, is associated with lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in healthy Japanese women: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Anatomical sacral slope (a-SS), a pelvic anatomical parameter that does not require the center of the femoral head, strongly correlates with pelvic incidence (PI) during three-dimensional measurements in normal subjects. Sagittal alignment of spinal and pelvic parameters is typically evaluated using two-dimensional radiographs; however, the relationship between a-SS and PI has not been evaluated using radiographs. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between a-SS and other spinal and pelvic parameters using radiographs. METHODS: We evaluated 144 healthy women. Using sagittal radiographs, we measured lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis, PI, SS, pelvic tilt, and a-SS, which were defined as the angle between the superior end plate of S1 and a line perpendicular to the anterior pelvic plane. Pearson coefficients were used to determine correlations, and intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for validation. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between PI and a-SS (r = 0.756). Moreover, correlations between a-SS and LL and between PI and LL were similar (r = 0.661 and r = 0.554, respectively). The intraobserver ICCs were 0.884 for a-SS and 0.840 for PI. The interobserver ICCs were 0.856 for a-SS and 0.653 for PI. CONCLUSION: a-SS was strongly correlated with PI. The correlation between a-SS and LL was equivalent to the correlation between PI and LL. Moreover, the ICC for a-SS was larger than that of PI. This study suggests that a-SS is a useful new pelvic anatomical parameter that can be used instead of PI.

Incidence of spinal deformities and the relationship with physical status and back pain in ambulant adults with cerebral palsy and spastic diplegia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of spinal deformities in ambulant adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and spastic diplegia, more than 15 years after orthopaedic interval surgery approach (ISA) treatment, and its relationship to contextual factors, level of pain and physical status. METHODS: Spinal X-rays, pain (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and location/frequency) questionnaires and physical examination assessing lower extremity muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), motor control (selectivity scale) and muscle tone (Ashworth score) were conducted in 30 adults with spastic diplegic CP. RESULTS: Mild scoliosis (curve 12-22°) was determined in eight (28%) participants. Hyperkyphosis (> 50°) was reported in two (7%) and lumbar hyperlordosis (> 60°) in five (17%) participants. Pain was most commonly reported at cervical (n = 19, 63%) and lumbosacral (n = 18, 60%) area, resulting in 'moderate disability' for six (20%) and 'severe disability' for one (3%) participant. Most apparent physical abnormalities determined were hip abduction weakness and increased rectus femoris muscle tone. Regarding correlations, no relations were found for scoliosis curvature, but kyphosis curvature was related to females, ODI scores (lifting and sitting) and increased muscle tone of ankle plantar flexor muscles, lordosis curvature to passive hip extension mobility, and hip flexors and ankle plantar flexors muscle tone. CONCLUSION: Adults with spastic diplegic CP who received their first orthopaedic intervention more than 15 years ago (based on ISA) showed similar incidence of spinal deformities as reported in the younger CP population, suggesting stability of spinal curvature into adulthood. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Sagittal spinal parameters after en bloc resection of mobile spine tumors.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: En bloc resection and reconstruction (EBR) in patients with spinal malignancy aims to achieve local disease control. This is an invasive procedure with significant alterations of the physiological anatomy and subsequently, the spino-pelvic alignment. Sagittal spinal parameters are useful measurements to objectively identify disproportionate alignment on a radiograph. In the field of spinal deformities, there is increasing evidence for a relationship between sagittal alignment and patient reported outcomes. PURPOSE: To determine sagittal spino-pelvic alignment after EBR in patients with spinal malignancies and the effect of these parameters on surgical and patient reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. METHODS: We included 35 patients who underwent EBR for spinal malignancies between 2000 and 2018. Radiographic measurements were performed using semi-automatic software; the parameters included were pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), global tilt and lumbar lordosis. We calculated PI-based Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scores and prospective patient reported outcome scores Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) were used. RESULTS: Twenty-one (60%) patients filled out the PROMIS-PF score at a median of 16 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 4-108) after surgery with a median score of 39 (IQR 32-42), the median GAP score was 7 (IQR 5-9). Bivariate analysis showed no statistically significant relationship between GAP score and instrumentation failure or need for revision surgery. Multivariable analysis of GAP score and PROMIS-PF score corrected for local disease recurrence showed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of -1.721 (p=.026; 95%CI=-3.216, -0.226). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, all patients had a moderate or severe disproportioned spinal alignment after EBR and reconstruction surgery. The degree of sagittal spino-pelvic misalignment after EBR for spinal malignancies seems to be associated with patient reported health status in terms of PROMIS-PF scores. Further research with a larger patient cohort and standardized imaging and follow-up protocols is necessary in order to accurately use sagittal alignment as a predictive value for instrumentation failure and revision surgery.

Adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery for degenerative disease: Incidence and risk factors.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for occurrence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) after posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 630 patients who underwent posterior lumbar transpedicular instrumentation for degenerative lumbar disorders between April 2008 and April 2012. On the basis of developing ASD at follow-up, patients were categorized into two groups: the ASD group and the non-ASD (N-ASD) group. These two groups were compared for patient characteristics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters to investigate the possible predictive factors of ASD. RESULTS: Of the 630 individuals participated in the study, 76 (12.1%) patients had ASD. Mean and standard deviation of age were 61.37 ± 4.12 years for the ASD group and 62.37 ± 3.9 for the N-ASD group ( p = 0.79). The average follow-up period was 51 ± 2.2 months in the ASD group and 52 ± 2.3 months in the N-ASD group ( p = 0.691). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, smoking, and osteoporosis, with all p > 0.05. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that higher preoperative body mass index (BMI; odds ratio (OR) 1.233, p = 0.005), preoperative disc degeneration (OR 1.033, p = 0.024), decreased postoperative lumbar lordosis (OR 3.080, p = 0.011), fusion at more than four levels (OR 4.280, p = 0.014), and intraoperative superior facet joint violation (OR 7.480, p = 0.009) were independently associated with ASD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher preoperative BMI, preoperative disc degeneration, decreased postoperative lumbar lordosis, fusion at more than four levels, and intraoperative superior facet joint violation have a statistically significant increased risk of developing ASD.

Obesity does not impact clinical outcome but affects cervical sagittal alignment and adjacent segment degeneration in short term follow-up after an anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obesity increases complications and cost following spine surgery. However, the impact on sagittal alignment and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion is less understood. PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical decompression and fusion between obese and nonobese patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: In all, 467 patients that underwent an anterior cervical decompression and fusion procedure from January 2008 through December 2015 were assessed. Surgery indications were radiculopathy, myelopathy, or myeloradiculopathy that had failed nonoperative treatments. Exclusion criteria included patients who had postoperative follow-up less than 6 months. Of 467 patients originally identified, 399 fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following patient-reported outcomes were obtained: Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale scores for the neck and arm pain. Radiographic assessments included: C2-C7 lordosis, T1 angle, levels fused, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), fusion mass lordosis, proximal and distal adjacent segment lordosis, ASD, and presence of fusion. METHODS: Plain radiographs were performed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and final follow-up. Demographic information was collected on all patients. Baseline patient characteristics were compared using chi-squared analysis and independent sample t tests for categorical and continuous data, respectively. For analysis, patients were divided into 4 groups based on obesity stratification as defined by Center for Disease Control: body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2 (normal weight), BMI≥25 kg/m2 to <30 kg/m2 (overweight), ≥30 kg/m2 to <35 kg/m2 (Class I obesity), BMI≥35 kg/m2 to <40 kg/m2 (Class II obesity), and BMI≥40 kg/m2 (Class III obesity). Additionally, obese (≥30 kg/m2) and nonobese (<30 kg/m2) patients were compared in a separate analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes among all BMI classes, as well as between BMI≥30 kg/m2 versus BMI<30 kg/m2 study groups. Multivariate analyses controlled for differences in baseline patient characteristics and included age, sex, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score, diabetes mellitus, and number of levels. RESULTS: Of the 399 patients assessed, 97 were identified as normal weight, 157 as overweight, 81 with Class I obesity, 45 with Class II obesity, and 19 with Class III obesity. On multivariate analysis, despite having similar SVA measurements on preoperative radiographs, increase in BMI was associated with increase in postoperative SVA (p=0.041) along with significantly larger SVA in immediate postoperative (p=0.004) and final follow-up radiographs (p=0.003) for patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2 versus BMI<30 kg/m2. Furthermore, patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2 had smaller preoperative (p=0.012), immediate postoperative (p=0.017), and final lordosis (p<0.001) in addition to smaller immediate postoperative (p=0.025) and final fusion segment lordosis (p=0.015) and smaller preoperative (p=0.024) and final distal lordosis (p=0.021) compared with patients with BMI<30 kg/m2. Additionally, greater BMI was associated with lower final Visual Analog Scale neck scores (p=0.008). Radiographic early ASD rates were higher in patients BMI≥30 kg/m2 versus BMI<30 kg/m2 (p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, obese patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion had similar patient-reported outcomes compared with nonobese patients but had worse radiographic parameters and higher rates of ASD development compared with nonobese patients. This underscores the importance of patient selection and surgical approach for both patient populations.

Change of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters after Selective and Non-Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

AIM: To compare the postoperative changes of both sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters in patients with Lenke Type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective and non-selective fusion surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among 53 Lenke Type 1 AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery at our centre between 2006 and 2012. Patients were classified as group 1 if they underwent selective surgery and as group 2 if they underwent non-selective surgery. Surgical results of preoperative and postoperative sagittal and spinopelvic measurements, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) values were analysed using the SURGIMAP© Software (Nemaris Inc. USA) measurement system. RESULTS: In both groups, a comparison of pre- and postoperative sagittal spinal parameters did not show a statistically significant difference. In both groups, pre- and postoperative measurements of LL and TK did not show a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: After selective and non-selective surgery, sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters are not affected in the middle term. We think that the long-term studies to be done in this regard will increasingly require the necessity of keeping the pelvis in mind while evaluating the sagittal plan in AIS surgery.