Hemorrhagic retinal arterial macroaneurysm combined with branch retinal artery occlusion treated with intravitreal conbercept injection: A case report.

RATIONALE: Branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) is a rare complication of retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM), a low-incidence ocular disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 75-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of blurred vision. DIAGNOSES: The patient for 4 days received a diagnosis of RAM combined with BRAO. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with two successive intravitreal conbercept injections. OUTCOMES: The patient's best-corrected visual acuity improved, and the RAM diminished. LESSONS: Administration of conbercept injection might be an effective treatment for complex RAM with BRAO.

Visual Recovery and Prognosis in the Treatment of Submacular Hemorrhage due to Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysm: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: This study was carried out to evaluate the visual acuity (VA), complications, and prognosis of patients diagnosed with submacular hemorrhage (SMH) from polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM) treated by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and air tamponade in vitreous cavity. It facilitates the development of generic treatment methods that can be widely used to improve vision and treat potential complications in patients with SMH, regardless of the underlying pathophysiological condition, such as PCV or RAM. Methods: In this retrospective study, SMH patients were divided into two groups based on their diagnosis: (1) polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and (2) retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM). The visual recovery and complications of patients with PCV and RAM after PPV + tPA (subretinal) surgery were analyzed. Results: A total of 36 eyes of 36 patients were included: PCV (47.22%, 17/36) and RAM (52.78%, 19/36). The mean age of the patients was 64 years, and 63.89% of the patients (23/36) were female. The median VA was 1.85 logMAR before surgery, 0.93 and 0.98 logMAR at 1 and 3 months after surgery, respectively, indicating that most patients' vision improved after surgery. At the 1 and 3 months postoperative follow-up, each patient was diagnosed with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, and four patients had vitreous hemorrhage at 3 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, patients exhibited macular subretinal hemorrhage, retinal bulge, and exudation around the blood clot. Postoperatively, most patients showed dispersal of subretinal hemorrhage. Optical coherence tomography results revealed retinal hemorrhage involving the macula and hemorrhagic bulges under both the neuroepithelium and the pigment epithelium under the fovea preoperatively. After surgery, the air injected into the vitreous cavity was completely absorbed and the subretinal hemorrhage was dispersed. Conclusion: PPV combined with subretinal tPA injection and air tamponade in the vitreous cavity can facilitate modest visual recovery in patients with SMH due to PCV and RAM. However, some complications may occur, and their management remains challenging.

Nonexudative Perifoveal Vascular Anomalous Complex: The Subclinical Stage of Perifoveal Exudative Vascular Anomalous Complex?

PURPOSE: To describe the pre-exudative stage of exudative perifoveal vascular anomalous complex (ePVAC), referred to as nonexudative PVAC (nePVAC). DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative case series. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with nePVAC were identified at 4 retina referral centers worldwide. Multimodal retinal imaging, including structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography (OCT-A), were performed at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Six eyes (6 patients, mean 75 ± 10 years of age) were included. Unrelated chorioretinal diseases were diagnosed in the affected eyes in 5 of 6 cases. At baseline, nePVAC is characterized by microvascular abnormalities featuring an isolated, perifoveal, large intraretinal aneurysm surrounded by capillary rarefaction at OCT-A examination, without any sign of exudation with structural OCT, and without visual impairment. Four patients were followed for a mean of 21 ± 14 months. During the follow-up, 3 of 4 eyes (75%) developed signs of exudation after a mean of 15 ± 9 months, associated with metamorphopsia and visual decline at the time of exudation. Best-corrected visual acuity decreased from 20/25 to 20/40 Snellen equivalent (P = .035) and central macular thickness increased from 268 ± 27 µm to 339 ± 65 µm (P = .145). Three patients were treated with 2.3 ± 0.6 intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor without significant improvement of best-corrected visual acuity or macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: nePVAC may represent the subclinical pre-exudative stage of ePVAC, notable for an absence of exudation or visual impairment. nePVAC and ePVAC should be considered as part of the same spectrum, namely PVAC. Typically, nePVAC develops signs of exudation over time, causing metamorphopsia and visual decline and therefore these lesions warrant continued close monitoring with multimodal retinal imaging.

Long-term resolution of chronic macular edema after a single dose of intravitreal dexamethasone in familial retinal arterial macroaneurysm.

PURPOSE: To report a favorable effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in Familial Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysms (FRAM). METHODS: Retrospective Case Report. RESULTS: A 32-year-old male who presented with bilateral retinal macroaneurysms. Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) revealed a homozygous c.830-1 G > A mutation in Insulin Growth Factor Binding Protein 7 (IGFBP7) gene, confirming the diagnosis FRAM. The left eye was lost in the course of the disease, whereas the right eye developed a persistent macular edema due to multiple leaking retinal arterial macroaneurysms and responded poorly to intravitreal ranibizumab and only partially to intravitreal aflibercept. Intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in the right eye, on the other hand, resulted in marked visual and structural improvement. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone injections have beneficial anatomical and visual outcomes in FRAM patients with persistent macular edema poorly responsive to intravitreal injections.

To treat or not to treat: a clinical series of retinal arterial macroaneurysms: A single-center retrospective study.

Retinal arterial macroaneurysms (RAMs) develop as outpouchings of the arterial wall that is weakened by arteriosclerosis. The traditional treatment of RAMs comprises observation, focal laser photocoagulation, or surgery. Recently, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs has been announced as an effective therapy for fovea-threatening RAMs and quickly improve visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT).In the retrospective series, medical charts and ocular images of 24 patients diagnosed as having RAM between May 2011 and November 2018 in our facility were reviewed to delineate clinical manifestations and visual prognosis in RAM patients receiving different treatment modalities. Twenty-four patients (25 eyes; 11 men and 13 women) were enrolled, and one eye with comorbidity of branch retinal vein occlusion was excluded. The mean age of the patients was 69.00 ±â€Š13.45 years. Fourteen patients (58.33%) had a history of hypertension, and 17 patients (70.83%) were aged > 60 years. Furthermore, patients with fovea-threatening RAMs presented with either hypertension or were aged > 60 years.Eyes with fovea involvement (n = 18) were analyzed and separated into two groups according to their treatment modalities: those receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (n = 13) and observation only (n = 5). The baseline visual acuity revealed no significant difference in the two groups. In patients receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, a significantly better visual acuity was detected after anti-VEGF intravitreal injections than the baseline visual acuity (logMAR, 0.78 ±â€Š0.51 vs 1.52 ±â€Š0.48, P < .001), and CRT significantly improved (505.50 ±â€Š159.26 µm vs 243.60 ±â€Š60.17 µm, P = .001). Patients receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections also revealed better final visual acuity than those in the observation group (logMAR, 0.78 ±â€Š0.51 vs 1.34 ±â€Š0.48, P = .04).A systematic work-up for hypertension and arteriosclerotic disease could be considered the recommended procedure once RAM has been diagnosed. With better final visual acuity, significant visual improvements, and fast reduction of CRT observed in patients with fovea-threatening RAMs receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, intravitreal anti-VEGF was considered an effective therapy for complicated RAM. During the follow-up period, the majority of RAM eyes had good maintenance of visual function even with foveal complications.

INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INJECTIONS FOR EXUDATIVE RETINAL ARTERIAL MACROANEURYSMS.

PURPOSE: There is no established therapy for exudative-hemorrhagic complications in primary retinal arteriolar macroaneurysm (RAM). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter interventional study of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in symptomatic RAMs. Central macular thickness in µm and best-corrected visual acuity in logMar were correlated with the RAM size and distance to the macula. Statistical analyses were performed using paired comparisons and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes (32 patients) were treated with a mean of 2.7 injections over a mean follow-up of 16.6 months. Initial best-corrected visual acuity correlated with the RAM size and distance to the macula (P = 0.02). Central macular thickness decreased by 131,180, and 211 µm at 1, 2, and 3 months after the first injection (P < 0.001). Best-corrected visual acuity improved by 0.47 and 0.38 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study lines at 2 and 3 months (P = 0.005). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor response correlated with the RAM size (P = 0.04) and the distance to the macula (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic RAMs can be treated successfully with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, leading to a decrease in macular edema.