Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 81
Filtrar
1.
Retina ; 41(9): 1883-1891, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411473

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate 18 months' results of a strict anti-vascular endothelial growth factor protocol for radiation maculopathy following proton therapy in choroidal melanoma. METHODS: Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized study of 74 radiation maculopathy patients presenting macular lipid deposits, hemorrhages, microaneurysms, cystoid edema, nerve layer infarction, telangiectasia, or capillary nonperfusion. The study group included 52 consecutive patients injected with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (bevacizumab/ranibizumab: 46/6) every two months for the first and every 3 months for the second year, with minimum 12 months' follow-up. The control group consisted of 22 patients having declined this treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography were recorded at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The foveal avascular zone and capillary density were measured at the superficial capillary plexus. RESULTS: Radiation maculopathy was diagnosed at 2 years (1.5-3.5) after proton therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline, 12 and 18 months improved in the study group from 0.45, 0.3 to 0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, but decreased in the control group from 0.5, 0.9 to 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution respectively (P < 0.001 at 12 months). Simultaneously, foveal avascular zone enlargement was less in the study (from 0.377, 0.665 to 0.744 mm2) than control group (from 0.436, 1.463 to 2.638 mm2) (P = 0.05 at 12 months). CMT (280 and 276 µm) and capillary density (37% and 38%, at baseline, respectively) did not evolve significantly different. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, every 2 months for the first and every 3 months for the second year, slow down, over up to 18 months, vision loss and anatomical degradation in radiation maculopathy following proton therapy for choroidal melanoma.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Coroide/radioterapia , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Melanoma/radioterapia , Microcirculação/efeitos dos fármacos , Terapia com Prótons/efeitos adversos , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Macula Lutea/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Microcirculação/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual
2.
Ophthalmology ; 128(1): 152-161, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32574763

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models could aid the understanding of dose dependence of radiation-induced toxicities after eye-preserving radiotherapy of choroidal melanomas. We performed NTCP-modeling and established dose-response relationships for visual acuity (VA) deterioration and common late complications after treatments with proton therapy (PT). DESIGN: Retrospective study from single, large referral center. PARTICIPANTS: We considered patients from Nice, France, diagnosed with choroidal melanoma and treated primarily with hypofractionated PT (52 Gy physical dose in 4 fractions). Complete VA deterioration information was available for 1020 patients, and complete information on late complications was available for 991 patients. METHODS: Treatment details, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for relevant anatomic structures, and patient and tumor characteristics were available from a dedicated ocular database. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) variable selection was used to identify variables with the strongest impact on each end point, followed by multivariate Cox regressions and logistic regressions to analyze the relationships among dose, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dose-response relationship for VA deterioration and late complications. RESULTS: Dose metrics for several structures (i.e., optic disc, macula, retina, globe, lens, ciliary body) correlated with clinical outcome. The near-maximum dose to the macula showed the strongest correlation with VA deterioration. The near-maximum dose to the retina was the only variable with clear impact on the risk of maculopathy, the dose to 20% of the optic disc had the largest impact on optic neuropathy, dose to 20% of cornea had the largest impact on neovascular glaucoma, and dose to 20% of the ciliary body had the largest impact on ocular hypertension. The volume of the ciliary body receiving 26 Gy was the only variable associated with the risk of cataract, and the volume of retina receiving 52 Gy was associated with the risk of retinal detachment. Optic disc-to-tumor distance was the only variable associated with dry eye syndrome in the absence of DVH for the lachrymal gland. CONCLUSIONS: VA deterioration and specific late complications demonstrated dependence on dose delivered to normal structures in the eye after PT for choroidal melanoma. VA deterioration depended on dose to a range of structures, whereas more specific complications were related to dose metrics for specific structures.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Coroide/radioterapia , Cristalino/patologia , Macula Lutea/patologia , Melanoma/radioterapia , Disco Óptico/patologia , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Neoplasias da Coroide/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Cristalino/efeitos da radiação , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disco Óptico/efeitos da radiação , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 138(8): 835-842, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32644148

RESUMO

Importance: Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment offers better outcomes than the natural history of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), a less burdensome, less expensive, and more durable treatment is needed. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of epimacular brachytherapy (EMB) for chronic, active, neovascular ARMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Macular Epiretinal Brachytherapy vs Ranibizumab (Lucentis) Only Treatment (MERLOT) pivotal device trial was conducted at 24 National Health Service hospitals across the UK. Patients who had neovascular ARMD and received intravitreal ranibizumab were enrolled between November 10, 2009, and January 30, 2012. Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 and were stratified by lens status and angiographic lesion type to receive either EMB plus as-needed ranibizumab or as-needed ranibizumab monotherapy. Participants were followed up monthly for 24 months and then assessed at a final visit at month 36. Masking of participants and clinicians was not possible, but best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and imaging were analyzed by masked assessors. Analysis followed the intent-to-treat approach. Interventions: Pars plana vitrectomy with 24 Gy EMB plus as-needed ranibizumab vs as-needed ranibizumab monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were the number of as-needed ranibizumab injections and the mean change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA with a noninferiority margin of -5 ETDRS letters. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of participants losing fewer than 15 ETDRS letters and gaining 0 or more or 15 or more ETDRS letters and the mean change in angiographic total lesion size, choroidal neovascularization size, and foveal thickness on optical coherence tomography. Results: Of 363 participants, 329 (90.6%) completed 24 months of follow-up (222 participants in the EMB group and 107 in the ranibizumab group). The mean (SD) age of the combined groups was 76.5 (7.4) years. The mean (SD) number of ranibizumab injections was 9.3 (6.7) in the EMB group and 8.3 (4.5) in the ranibizumab group, with a difference of 1.0 injection (95% CI, -0.3 to 2.3; P = .13). The mean (SD) BCVA change was -11.2 (15.7) ETDRS letters in the EMB group and -1.4 (10.9) ETDRS letters in the ranibizumab group, with a difference of 9.8 ETDRS letters (95% CI, -6.7 to -12.9). In the EMB group, 65.6% of participants (160 of 244) lost fewer than 15 ETDRS letters vs 86.6% (103 of 119) in the ranibizumab group, with a difference of 21% (95% CI, 12.4%-29.5%; P < .001). Microvascular abnormalities occurred in 20 of 207 eyes (9.7%) in the EMB group and 1 of 97 eyes (1.0%) in the ranibizumab group. These abnormalities occurred outside the foveal center, and there were no unexpected safety concerns. Conclusions and Relevance: The MERLOT trial found that despite the acceptable safety of EMB, it did not reduce the number of ranibizumab injections and was associated with worse visual acuity than anti-VEGF treatment alone; these results do not support EMB use as an adjunct treatment for chronic, active neovascular ARMD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006538.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia , Neovascularização de Coroide/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Estrôncio/uso terapêutico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neovascularização de Coroide/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização de Coroide/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Retratamento , Radioisótopos de Estrôncio/efeitos adversos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Vitrectomia , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/fisiopatologia
4.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina ; 51(4): S50-S53, 2020 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348535

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the percentage of vitreous adherence to the posterior pole in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with ocular ultrasonography (US) and establish a comparison with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional consecutive analysis of patients followed in a diabetic retinopathy consultation. Vitrectomized eyes and patients with epiretinal membranes were excluded. A comparison between macular SD-OCT 20 × 20°, SD-OCT 55 × 35°, and ocular US for the vitreous status was performed. A subanalysis of the percentage of eyes with thickened posterior hyaloid and focal vitreous macular adhesion (VMA) was determined with SD-OCT 20 × 20° and SD-OCT 55 × 35°. RESULTS: From 78 eyes of 39 patients, 55 eyes were included. All patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus with a median duration of 20 years (range: 3 to 40 years); 60% were phakic, and 61.8% were male. Previous treatments included intravitreal injections in 54.5% eyes, macular laser in 67.3%, and panretinal photocoagulation in 56.4%. All eyes had a non-posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) status on US. The 55 × 35° SD-OCT detected a non-PVD status in 96.4% (100% in video display mode) and a VMA in 87.3%. The 20 × 20° SD-OCT only detected a VMA in 43.6% of cases, with a thickened posterior hyaloid in 40% and a focal VMA in 18.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' DME patients, vitreous adherence to the posterior pole was highly prevalent, with a total agreement between US and SD-OCT 55 × 35° video display mode. SD-OCT 20 × 20° is not an accurate method to diagnose VMA compared to SD-OCT 55 × 35°. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S50-S53.].


Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Macula Lutea/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Corpo Vítreo/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Retinopatia Diabética/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Edema Macular/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 14(3): 224-227, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29261556

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To present a case of a patient who suffered a macular burn after an attempted YAG laser capsulotomy because of the inadvertent use of the selective laser trabeculoplasty mode of a dual-mode laser. METHOD: Case report. RESULTS: A 62-year-old man with slight opacification of the posterior capsule noted sudden central vision loss immediately after an attempted YAG laser capsulotomy. The selective laser trabeculoplasty mode of a dual-mode laser had inadvertently been used. Color photographs, fluorescein angiography, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography revealed a laser burn in the macula. The patient's central vision was impaired. CONCLUSION: Inadvertent selection of the selective laser trabeculoplasty mode when attempting to perform a YAG laser capsulotomy with a dual-mode laser may cause a macular burn with impairment of central vision. We encourage all users of dual-mode lasers to actively choose and verify the appropriate settings to minimize the risk of inadvertent retinal damage.


Assuntos
Queimaduras Oculares/etiologia , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Cápsula do Cristalino/cirurgia , Macula Lutea/patologia , Trabeculectomia/efeitos adversos , Acuidade Visual , Queimaduras Oculares/diagnóstico , Humanos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos
6.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 4(3): 320-326, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757690

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study longitudinal changes in retinal capillary circulation in eyes treated with iodine 125 (I125) plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma using OCT angiography (OCTA). DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective study of 21 patients undergoing treatment for uveal melanoma with I125 plaque brachytherapy. Eyes with melanoma were imaged with OCTA before treatment and at 12-month intervals until 2 years after brachytherapy. PARTICIPANTS: After institutional review board approval, participants were enrolled prospectively from an academic ocular oncology clinic. METHODS: Peripapillary (4.5 × 4.5-mm) and macular (3 × 3-mm) OCTA scans were acquired with AngioVue (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, CA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The peripapillary nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP_CD), macular superficial vascular complex vessel density (mSVC_VD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area were calculated. RESULTS: Before treatment, no significant difference was found in the NFLP_CD, mSVC_VD, or FAZ area between eyes with melanoma and normal fellow eyes. By 24 months, 11 eyes had developed clinical signs of radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, or both. In treated eyes, the NFLP_CD (48.4±4.1%) was reduced at 12 months (46.7±5.0%; P = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and 24 months (44.5±6.1%; P < 0.001). Similarly, the mSVC_VD (48.4 2±3.6%) was reduced in treated eyes at 12 months (43.5±5.9%; P = 0.01) and 24 months (37.4±9.1%; P < 0.001). The FAZ area (0.26±0.11 mm2) increased in treated eyes at 12 months (0.35±0.22 mm2; P = 0.009) and 24 months (0.81±1.03 mm2; P = 0.001). When only eyes with clinically evident radiation changes were evaluated, the changes in NFLP_CD, mSVC_VD, and FAZ area were more pronounced. OCT angiography measurements correlated with both radiation dose and visual acuity. The mSVC_VD measured at 12 months was found to predict the development of clinically apparent radiation retinopathy within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: OCT angiography demonstrated early emergence of peripapillary and macular capillary vasculature changes after I125 plaque brachytherapy. OCT angiography provided a quantitative measurement of retinal capillary changes associated with ischemia that correlated with visual acuity and radiation dose and may predict future development of radiation-induced retinal toxicity.


Assuntos
Capilares/patologia , Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/complicações , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Vasos Retinianos/patologia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , Macula Lutea/irrigação sanguínea , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Acuidade Visual
7.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 117(6): 640-643, dic. 2019. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1046619

RESUMO

El uso indebido de los punteros láser, especialmente el recreativo en los niños, puede causar lesiones retinianas que amenazan la visión. El daño retiniano que producen no está bien caracterizado, debido a que la mayoría de las publicaciones son casos aislados o series pequeñas. El tratamiento y el pronóstico visual es variable según la morfología del daño macular que presenten. En algunos casos, no existe tratamiento, y pueden evolucionar a la curación espontánea; sin embargo, otros precisan cirugía. En una serie de 13 casos, uno requirió cirugía, mientras que el resto necesitó solo observación. De estos 13 casos, 3 pacientes se curaron en forma espontánea, con agudeza visual de 10/10.Se describen dos pacientes de 16 y 12 años con disminución de agudeza visual tras el uso indebido de punteros láser. En el fondo de ojo, presentaron alteraciones maculares. La agudeza visual de ambos se recuperó completamente sin tratamiento.


The improper use of laser pointers, especially for recreational use in children, may cause sight-threatening retinal injuries. The retinal damage it is not well characterized because most publications are isolated cases or small series.The treatment and visual prognosis are variable according to the morphology of the macular damage. In some cases, there is no treatment, and spontaneous healing can be developed; however, others require surgery. In a series of 13 cases, 1 required surgery and the rest observation; 3 patients obtained a spontaneous healing with visual acuity of 10/10.We describe two patients aged 16 and 12 years with decreased visual acuity. Macular alterations appear in the fundus of the eye. The visual acuity of both recovered completely without treatment


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Adolescente , Doenças Retinianas , Lasers/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Macula Lutea/lesões
11.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 221, 2018 Nov 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that proximity of the tumor to the optic disc and macula, and radiation dose to the critical structures are substantial risk factors for vision loss following plaque brachytherapy. However, there is little dosimetry data published on this. In this study, therefore, the relationship between distance from tumor margin and radiation dose to the optic disc and macula in ocular brachytherapy using 125I Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques was comprehensively investigated. From the information, this study aimed to allow for estimation of optic disc dose and macula dose without treatment planning. METHODS: An in-house brachytherapy dose calculation program utilizing the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-43 U1 formalism with a line source approximation in a homogenous water phantom was developed and validated against three commercial treatment planning systems (TPS). Then optic disc dose and macula dose were calculated as a function of distance from tumor margin for various tumor basal dimensions for seven COMS plaques (from 10 mm to 22 mm in 2 mm increments) loaded with commercially available 125I seeds models (IAI-125A, 2301 and I25.S16). A prescribed dose of 85 Gy for an irradiation time of 168 h was normalized to a central-axis depth of 5 mm. Dose conversion factors for each seed model were obtained by taking ratios of total reference air kerma per seed at various prescription depths (from 1 mm to 10 mm in 1 mm intervals) to that at 5 mm. RESULTS: The in-house program demonstrated relatively similar accuracy to commercial TPS. Optic disc dose and macula dose decreased as distance from tumor margin and tumor basal dimension increased. Dose conversion factors increased with increasing prescription depth. There existed dose variations (<8%) among three 125I seed models. Optic disc dose and macula dose for each COMS plaque and for each seed model are presented in a figure format. Dose conversion factors for each seed model are presented in a tabular format. CONCLUSIONS: The data provided in this study would enable clinicians in any clinic using 125I COMS plaques to estimate optic disc dose and macula dose without dose calculations.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Oculares/patologia , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Melanoma/patologia , Disco Óptico/efeitos da radiação , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Braquiterapia/instrumentação , Neoplasias Oculares/radioterapia , Humanos , Melanoma/radioterapia , Método de Monte Carlo , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
12.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 93(11): 530-541, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30228026

RESUMO

The human retina, as transducer of light energy, is especially exposed to light toxicity. Solar maculopathy has been the only form of photic maculopathy for millennia, often secondary to the observation of an eclipse. During the last century, technological advances have led to the appearance of new forms of photic maculopathy, related to the exposure to new forms of artificial light, such as welding devices and lasers. In recent years, the general use of laser pointers has led to an upturn in interest in this pathology. The aim of this review is to offer an integrated view of the different types of photic maculopathy. Due to the extension of this topic, the review is presented divided into two parts. In this first part solar maculopathy and welding arc maculopathy are presented.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Luz/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Animais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Surtos de Doenças , Olho/efeitos da radiação , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Oculares/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Oculares/história , Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos , História do Século XX , História Antiga , Humanos , Macaca mulatta , Macula Lutea/patologia , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Coelhos , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/história , Ratos , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/epidemiologia , Doenças Retinianas/história , Atividade Solar , Soldagem/instrumentação
13.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 93(11): 542-550, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30122550

RESUMO

The human retina, as transducer of light energy, is especially exposed to light toxicity. Solar maculopathy has been the only form of photic maculopathy for millennia, often secondary to the observation of an eclipse. During the last century, technological advances have led to the appearance of new forms of photic maculopathy, related to the exposure to new forms of artificial light, such as welding devices and lasers. In recent years the general use of laser pointers has led to an upturn in interest in this pathology. The aim of this review is to offer an integrated view of the different types of photic maculopathy. Due to the extension of the topic, the review is presented divided into 2 parts. In this second part, atomic bomb maculopathy, laser maculopathy, iatrogenic forms of photic maculopathy, and foveomacular retinitis are presented.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Luz/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Animais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Olho/efeitos da radiação , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Doença Iatrogênica , Lasers/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/lesões , Macula Lutea/patologia , Armas Nucleares , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Coelhos , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Lesões Experimentais por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões Experimentais por Radiação/patologia , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/epidemiologia , Perfurações Retinianas/etiologia , Perfurações Retinianas/cirurgia , Retinite/etiologia , Retinite/patologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD011977, 2018 05 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29786830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An intraocular lens (IOL) is a synthetic lens that is surgically implanted within the eye following removal of the crystalline lens, during cataract surgery. While all modern IOLs attenuate the transmission of ultra-violet (UV) light, some IOLs, called blue-blocking or blue-light filtering IOLs, also reduce short-wavelength visible light transmission. The rationale for blue-light filtering IOLs derives primarily from cell culture and animal studies, which suggest that short-wavelength visible light can induce retinal photoxicity. Blue-light filtering IOLs have been suggested to impart retinal protection and potentially prevent the development and progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We sought to investigate the evidence relating to these suggested benefits of blue-light filtering IOLs, and to consider any potential adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of blue-light filtering IOLs compared with non-blue-light filtering IOLs, with respect to providing protection to macular health and function. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 9); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; LILACS; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the ICTRP. The date of the search was 25 October 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), involving adult participants undergoing cataract extraction, where a blue-light filtering IOL was compared with an equivalent non-blue-light filtering IOL. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The prespecified primary outcome was the change in distance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as a continuous outcome, between baseline and 12 months of follow-up. Prespecified secondary outcomes included postoperative contrast sensitivity, colour discrimination, macular pigment optical density (MPOD), proportion of eyes with a pathological finding at the macula (including, but not limited to the development or progression of AMD, or both), daytime alertness, reaction time and patient satisfaction. We evaluated findings related to ocular and systemic adverse effects.Two review authors independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, extracted data from eligible RCTs and judged the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We reached a consensus on any disagreements by discussion. Where appropriate, we pooled data relating to outcomes and used random-effects or fixed-effect models for the meta-analyses. We summarised the overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 51 RCTs from 17 different countries, although most studies either did not report relevant outcomes, or provided data in a format that could not be extracted. Together, the included studies considered the outcomes of IOL implantation in over 5000 eyes. The number of participants ranged from 13 to 300, and the follow-up period ranged from one month to five years. Only two of the studies had a trial registry record and no studies referred to a published protocol. We did not judge any of the studies to have a low risk of bias in all seven domains. We judged approximately two-thirds of the studies to have a high risk of bias in domains relating to 'blinding of participants and personnel' (performance bias) and 'blinding of outcome assessment' (detection bias).We found with moderate certainty, that distance BCVA with a blue-light filtering IOL, at six to 18 months postoperatively, and measured in logMAR, was not clearly different to distance BCVA with a non-blue-light filtering IOL (mean difference (MD) -0.01 logMAR, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02, P = 0.48; 2 studies, 131 eyes).There was very low-certainty evidence relating to any potential inter-intervention difference for the proportion of eyes that developed late-stage AMD at three years of follow-up, or any stage of AMD at one year of follow-up, as data derived from one trial and two trials respectively, and there were no events in either IOL intervention group, for either outcome. There was very low-certainty evidence for the outcome for the proportion of participants who lost 15 or more letters of distance BCVA at six months of follow-up; two trials that considered a total of 63 eyes reported no events, in either IOL intervention group.There were no relevant, combinable data available for outcomes relating to the effect on contrast sensitivity at six months, the proportion of eyes with a measurable loss of colour discrimination from baseline at six months, or the proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable causal link with the study interventions after six months.We were unable to draw reliable conclusions on the relative equivalence or superiority of blue-light filtering IOLs versus non-blue-light filtering IOLs in relation to longer-term effects on macular health. We were also not able to determine with any certainty whether blue-light filtering IOLs have any significant effects on MPOD, contrast sensitivity, colour discrimination, daytime alertness, reaction time or patient satisfaction, relative to non-blue-light filtering IOLs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows with moderate certainty that there is no clinically meaningful difference in short-term BCVA with the two types of IOLs. Further, based upon available data, these findings suggest that there is no clinically meaningful difference in short-term contrast sensitivity with the two interventions, although there was a low level of certainty for this outcome due to a small number of included studies and their inherent risk of bias. Based upon current, best-available research evidence, it is unclear whether blue-light filtering IOLs preserve macular health or alter risks associated with the development and progression of AMD, or both. Further research is required to fully understand the effects of blue-light filtering IOLs for providing protection to macular health and function.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Filtração/instrumentação , Lentes Intraoculares , Luz , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Degeneração Macular/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Cor , Sensibilidades de Contraste , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
15.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 44(2): 190-197, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29587974

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate macular photostress and visual experience between coaxial microscope illumination versus oblique intracameral illumination during cataract surgery. SETTING: Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had cataract surgery using microscope illumination and intracameral illumination were included. The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire (seeing strong lights, feeling photophobia, feeling startled (fright) when seeing lights, seeing any colors, seeing any instruments or surgical procedures, and estimating intraoperative visual function) designed to describe their cataract surgery experience. The images projected on the retina of the model eye (rear view) with artificial opaque fragments in the anterior chamber during simulating cataract surgery were compared between the 2 illumination types. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the questionnaire. Scores for strong lights, photophobia, fright, and color perception were significantly higher with microscope illumination than with intracameral illumination (all P < .001). More patients preferred the intracameral illumination (45 [75.0%]) to the microscope illumination (13 [21.7%]). In the rear-view images created in a model eye, only the bright microscope light in the center was seen without any lens image in the microscope illumination. However, in the intracameral illumination, the less bright light from the light pipe in the periphery and the lens fragments were seen more clearly. CONCLUSIONS: In a view of the patients' visual experience, oblique intracameral illumination caused less subjective photostress and was preferred over coaxial microscope illumination. Objective findings from the model-eye experiment correlated to the result of visual experience.


Assuntos
Defeitos da Visão Cromática/etiologia , Luz/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Microscopia/instrumentação , Facoemulsificação , Fotofobia/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Ofuscação , Humanos , Iluminação/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 93(11): 551-554, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29456174

RESUMO

CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old man went to the emergency department the day after exposure to a laser pointer. Funduscopy revealed dispersed macular pigment alterations, and optical coherence tomography showed a disruption of the retinal layers. The visual acuity was counting fingers in both eyes. Nine months later, optical coherence tomography angiography showed a rarefaction in the choriocapillaris vascular flow in the area of the laser injuries. DISCUSSION: The retinal layer mainly damaged by the laser injury was the retinal pigment epithelium. However, it is suggested that the laser injury could involve tissues beyond the retinal pigment epithelium, since a rarefaction of the choriocapillaris was found after exposure to the laser.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Lasers/efeitos adversos , Macula Lutea/lesões , Adulto , Corioide/irrigação sanguínea , Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cistos/etiologia , Cistos/patologia , Emergências , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiofluoresceinografia , Humanos , Macula Lutea/diagnóstico por imagem , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/diagnóstico por imagem , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/lesões , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/efeitos da radiação , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica
17.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 133(4): 97-102, 2017.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28980573

RESUMO

The review covers different aspects of the impact of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the state of the macular zone of the retina. Literature search has revealed inconsistency of the published data and indicated the need for a more detailed study of this problem.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Facoemulsificação , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers/efeitos adversos , Lasers/classificação , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Facoemulsificação/métodos
18.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 37(6): 644-654, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044670

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Blue-blocking (BB) spectacle lenses, which attenuate short-wavelength light, are being marketed to alleviate eyestrain and discomfort when using digital devices, improve sleep quality and potentially confer protection from retinal phototoxicity. The aim of this review was to investigate the relative benefits and potential harms of these lenses. METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), recruiting adults from the general population, which investigated the effect of BB spectacle lenses on visual performance, symptoms of eyestrain or eye fatigue, changes to macular integrity and subjective sleep quality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers, until 30 April 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: Three studies (with 136 participants) met our inclusion criteria; these had limitations in study design and/or implementation. One study compared the effect of BB lenses with clear lenses on contrast sensitivity (CS) and colour vision (CV) using a pseudo-RCT crossover design; there was no observed difference between lens types (log CS; Mean Difference (MD) = -0.01 [-0.03, 0.01], CV total error score on 100-hue; MD = 1.30 [-7.84, 10.44]). Another study measured critical fusion frequency (CFF), as a proxy for eye fatigue, on wearers of low and high BB lenses, pre- and post- a two-hour computer task. There was no observed difference between low BB and standard lens groups, but there was a less negative change in CFF between the high and low BB groups (MD = 1.81 [0.57, 3.05]). Both studies compared eyestrain symptoms with Likert scales. There was no evidence of inter-group differences for either low BB (MD = 0.00 [-0.22, 0.22]) or high BB lenses (MD = -0.05 [-0.31, 0.21]), nor evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants showing an improvement in symptoms of eyestrain or eye fatigue. One study reported a small improvement in sleep quality in people with self-reported insomnia after wearing high compared to low-BB lenses (MD = 0.80 [0.17, 1.43]) using a 10-point Likert scale. A study involving normal participants found no observed difference in sleep quality. We found no studies investigating effects on macular structure or function. CONCLUSIONS: We find a lack of high quality evidence to support using BB spectacle lenses for the general population to improve visual performance or sleep quality, alleviate eye fatigue or conserve macular health.


Assuntos
Ritmo Circadiano/efeitos da radiação , Óculos , Luz , Sensibilidades de Contraste/efeitos da radiação , Dor Ocular/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sono/efeitos da radiação , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/prevenção & controle , Acuidade Visual/efeitos da radiação
19.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 181: 12-19, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647462

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the macular features of patients treated with proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma (CM), using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: This study included patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) for a small CM. Only patients who had received 100% of the dose of 60 Gy external beam radiation to the macular area were included in the analysis. All the patients had undergone a full ophthalmologic examination, including visual acuity, optical coherence tomography B-scan, and OCTA. Qualitative and quantitative vascular features of the retinal plexus and the choriocapillaris were analyzed on OCTA and compared with those in healthy subjects matched on age and sex. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had undergone an OCTA after PBR for a small CM. Seventeen patients (9 men and 8 women) were included. The mean age of the patients was 56.6 years (range, 28-86). At presentation, the mean tumor thickness was 3.39 mm (range, 1.3-7.0 mm). The mean follow-up duration was 35.8 months (range, 11-72 months). Thirteen patients (76.5%) had a clinical radiation maculopathy; 8 patients (47.1%) had macular cysts on OCT-B scan. All patients (100%) had abnormalities on OCTA. Some "signal void" spots were detected at the level of the choriocapillaris in 15 patients (88.2%). The mean vascular density (regarding the full retina) was significantly lower in the patients treated with PBR than in healthy subjects (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with PBR for CM (with 100% of the dose given to the macula) present major changes at both plexuses but also a vascular rarefaction of the choriocapillaris.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Coroide/radioterapia , Macula Lutea/diagnóstico por imagem , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Melanoma/radioterapia , Terapia com Prótons/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Retinianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Neoplasias da Coroide/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Vasos Retinianos/efeitos da radiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
20.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 101(12): 1699-1703, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28404670

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and duration of activity of a single intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by radiation maculopathy. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive eyes of 13 patients affected by radiation maculopathy secondary to eye irradiation for a primary uveal melanoma (Iodine-125 brachytherapy) and treated with a single intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant were retrospectively evaluated. Each patient underwent full ophthalmological examination, including fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), even in en-face modality. Follow-up was performed monthly over a 6-month period. RESULTS: At preinjection visit, the median central subfield thickness (CST) by SD-OCT was 407 µm (IQR, 357-524 µm) and the median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 61 ETDRS score (IQR, 54-67). The median gain of ETDRS letter at 1 month was 6.5 (IQR, 4-15) (p<0.01). The median CST showed a reduction of 120 µm (IQR, 62-134) (p<0.01). Further CST reduction was reported at 2 months' follow-up, with CST stabilisation at 3 months and maintenance of BCVA. At 4, 5 and 6 months' follow-up, all patients presented progressive retinal thickening (p<0.01) and BCVA reduction (p<0.01). No side effects were documented. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant reduces macular oedema secondary to radiation maculopathy and also improved visual acuity in a consistent proportion of patients. Signs of macular oedema recurrence may be detected at a median of 4 months after injection.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Lesões por Radiação/complicações , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Macula Lutea/patologia , Macula Lutea/efeitos da radiação , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Masculino , Melanoma/radioterapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uveais/radioterapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA