Sexual function and fertility of adult males with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung disease.

PURPOSE: The long-term impact of anorectal malformations (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HD) on sexual function is well recognized but understudied. This study evaluated self-reported sexual and fertility outcomes in adult males with ARM and HD. METHODS: This was an IRB approved, prospective study of males in the Adult Colorectal Research Registry who completed surveys between October 2019 and March 2022. Electronic surveys were administered after consenting to being contacted for research. Patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire and provided information on fertility outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients completed outcome questionnaires: 11 (16.9%) had HD and 54 (83.1%) had an ARM. Nineteen patients reported some degree of erectile dysfunction per IIEF criteria, a greater proportion of whom have ARM (p = 0.046). Twenty (30.7%) have reported having children; there were no differences in rates between HD and ARM patients. Most patients had not attempted to conceive, but eight patients, all of whom have ARM, have pursued fertility investigation or treatments. CONCLUSION: More patients with ARM reported some degree of erectile dysfunction compared to those with HD. Additionally, some have required fertility treatments. Further investigation is warranted to ensure true low rates of sexual and fertility dysfunction in patients with HD.

Experience with the management of anorectal malformations in Ibadan, Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: anorectal malformation is a multi-systemic birth defect of the distal gastrointestinal tract, the management of which is challenging to the surgeons, the patients and the parents. The presence of associated congenital malformations may worsen the outcome with consequent psychosocial effects on the patients and the parents. The characteristics of anorectal malformations with the challenges associated with their management and the outcomes are therefore presented here. METHODS: all patients managed for anorectal malformations from January 2003 to December 2017 were studied. Patients´ demography, clinical presentations, types of malformations, associated anomalies, procedures performed, post-operative complications and management outcome were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: eighty-eight children with anorectal malformations comprising 61 (69.3%) boys and 27 (30.7%) girls were studied with 76 (86.3%) patients presenting within the first year of life. Low anorectal malformation was observed in 14 (15.9%) patients, 71 (80.7%) patients had intermediate or high malformations and cloacal malformation was present in 3 (3.4%) patients. Associated congenital malformations were observed in 18 (20.5%) patients with 10 (55.6%) patients associated with intermediate or high malformations and urogenital system was the most common system whose anomalies were associated with anorectal malformations in 12 (13.6%) patients. Anoplasty was performed on 14 (15.9%) patients, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty was performed on 67 (76.1%) patients, abdominosacroperineal pull through on 4 (4.6%) patients and posterior sagittal anorectovaginourethroplasty on 3 (3.4%) patients. Six (6.8%) neonates died. CONCLUSION: immediate post-operative outcome was good; however, good functional outcome can only be assessed in an atmosphere of good follow-up which is still a problem in our environment.

Ongoing care for the patient with an anorectal malfromation; transitioning to adulthood.

Planned health care transition can improve the ability of young adults to manage their own health care to effecively use health services and ultimately maximize life-long functioning and well-being. Transitional care is a purposeful, planned process that addresses the medical, psychosocial and educational needs of adolescents and young adults with chronic physical and medical conditions as they move from child-centered to adult-oriented healthcare systems. Unsuccessful surgical transtion may result in physical and mental health implications for young patients, negative long-term outcomes and suboptimal use of health care resources. Anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung patients are an especially vulnerable patient population with ongoing surgical, physiologic and pyschosocial challenges.

Rectal Prolapse After Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations.

Aim: To clarify the characteristics of patients with rectal prolapse after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP), estimate the causes, and evaluate its impact on postoperative bowel function. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent LAARP for high- or intermediate-type anorectal malformation between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were compared between patients with (Group P) and without prolapse (normal, Group N). Fecal continence was evaluated using the clinical assessment score for fecal continence developed by the Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. For patients who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before LAARP, atrophy, or asymmetry of the anal sphincter and levator ani was evaluated by a radiologist. Results: Of the 49 patients, 29 (59%) had rectal prolapse after LAARP (Group P) and 20 did not (Group N). We found no significant difference in gender, type of malformations, incidence of associated spinal or lumbosacral anomalies, procedure time, and postoperative bowel function at ages 4, 8, 12, and 16 years. However, LAARP was performed significantly earlier in Group N (median [range], 180 [123-498] days) than in Group P (210 [141-570] days). In Group P, 18 patients (62%) developed prolapse before colostomy takedown. Eight of 26 patients who underwent surgical prolapse repair required redo procedures. Twenty-five patients who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI showed no significant relationship between the muscular abnormalities and the incidence of postoperative rectal prolapse. Conclusions: Although recurrence is common, performing LAARP at a younger age might prevent postoperative prolapse development.

Transperineal Intracath Meconiolysis and Evacuation Technique of "Distended" Bowel Evacuation for One-Stage Laparoscopic Anorectoplasty for High Anorectal Malformations in Males.

Introduction: One-stage anorectoplasty provides maximum potential for "normal" defecation reflexes right at birth and avoids complications and problems of colostomy. One-stage laparoscopic anorectoplasty (OSLARP) for rectourinary fistula (RUF) is restricted by distended bowel obscuring the working space for laparoscopy. This study describes transperineal intracath meconiolysis and evacuation (TIME) technique for OSLARP in the treatment of RUF in neonates. Materials and Technique: High male anorectal malformation (ARM) admitted from January 2016 to March 2019 were included in the study. Diagnosis of level of ARM was made on the basis of invertogram. Patient presenting with lethal comorbidities were excluded who underwent colostomy. The technique involved placement of a 16G intracath in the perineum through the site of future neo-anus, which was identified using muscle stimulator. Meconiolysis and evacuation was done using warm saline and 2% N-acetyl. The creation of enough abdominal space was achieved after evacuation and two working instruments were placed in paraumbilical positions. The laparoscopic dissection and division of fistula was done as followed in standard laparoscopic anorectoplasty. Results: Seventeen patients were selected for TIME technique but on laparoscopy 2 patients had severe necrotizing enterocolitis hence they underwent laparoscopy-assisted high sigmoid colostomy. Fifteen patients underwent OSLARP successfully. Mean weight was 2.5 ± 0.4 kg, mean gestational age was 36 ± 5 weeks, and mean age of presentation was 3.5 ± 1 days after birth. The TIME technique was successful decompressing bowel in all the patients. Out of 15 patients of OSLARP, 14 had rectoprostatic urethral fistula and 1 had rectovesical fistula. Mean total operative duration of OSLARP was 46 ± 15 minutes. Patients who could be followed for 3 years had good results in terms of continence and bowel movements. Discussion: TIME technique is a very simple and effective way to overcome the problem of associated colonic distention in neonatal one-stage laparoscopic anoplasty.

Does clinical score accurately support fecoflowmetry as a means to assess anorectal motor activity in pediatric patients after anorectal surgery?

PURPOSE: We investigated the relationship between Krickenbeck score (KS) and fecoflowmetry (FFM) parameters and assessed the characteristics of this new questionnaire test by comparing Kelly's clinical score (KCS) in pediatric patients with anorectal surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD). METHODS: We enrolled pediatric patients who underwent anorectal surgery for ARM or HD. Bowel function was assessed with KS and KCS thereafter, FFM and anorectal manometry (AM) were conducted. Patients were divided into subgroups according to each parameter of the scoring system and each FFM parameter was compared among the KCS or KS subgroups, respectively. Moreover, correlation analyses were conducted between FFM and AM parameters. RESULTS: The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KCS showed that Fmax in the KCS staining 2 group was significantly higher than that in KCS staining 1 group and the Fmax in KCS sphincter squeeze 1 group was significantly higher than that in KCS sphincter squeeze 0 group. Moreover, Fmax in the KCS "good" group was significantly higher than that in the KCS "fair" group. The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KS parameters showed that TR in the no soiling group was significantly higher than that in the KS grade 2 soiling group. FFM and AM parameters showed a significant positive correlation between Fmax and voluntary squeezing anal pressure. CONCLUSION: FFM clarified the different characteristics of two scoring systems, namely, KCS reflects the anal sphincter performance, whereas the KS soiling score might reflect the tolerance and evacuation ability.

Testicular function and sexuality in adult patients with anorectal malformation.

PURPOSE: To collect data on sexual and fertility issues in adult male patients with history of anorectal malformations (ARM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty adult males born with ARM, cared for at the Pediatric Surgery of Treviso and Padua Hospitals, were enrolled and interviewed about sexual habits and relationships. Testicular ultrasound, evaluation of male sex hormones and semen analysis were performed to assess testicular function and compare data with 15 fertile controls. Presence of erectile dysfunction was evaluated with IIEF-5 questionnaire. RESULTS: Cryptorchidism and recurrent orchiepididymitis were reported in 33% and 40% of patients, respectively. Average testicular volume resulted significantly lower than fertile controls (11.1 vs 14.3 mL, p = 0.002) and 53.5% presented testicular hypotrophy (<10 mL). Erectile dysfunction was reported by a single patient and ejaculatory anomalies by 46.5%. Thirteen patients were azoospermic/cryptozoospermic; 6 of them presented a reduced peripheral sensitivity to androgens (ASI > 139). Coital debut resulted delayed at 18 years old (vs 15 years in the control group). Overall 63.5% reported their condition did not affect their sexual sphere. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of testicular function is recommended in ARM patients to detect and treat possible infertility disorders, to recognize the clinical conditions which could affect the spermatogenesis since childhood, and to guarantee psychological support. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE RATING: Prognosis study. Level III (case-control study).

Laparoscopic surgical technique to enhance the management of anorectal malformations: 330 cases' experience in a single center.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is considered to benefit the patients with vesico-prostatic fistula. The aim of this study is to present the details of our LAARP technique for improving the short- and long-term outcomes in the patients with high and intermediate types of anorectal malformations (ARMs). METHODS: 330 patients with high-type (174 cases) and intermediate-type (156 cases) anorectal malformation (aged 8 days to 15 years) underwent LAARP from 2001 to 2019. LAARP was performed for full mobilization and resection of the dilated rectum, intra-rectal closure of the fistula, visualization, and enlargement of the center of the longitudinal muscle tube (LMT) from pelvic and perineal aspects. RESULTS: LAARP was performed in all patients and no patient was converted to open procedure. The urethral diverticulum was found in three patients (1.02%, 3/294) according to postoperative protocol voiding cystourethrogram but was not associated with any symptoms such as urinary tract infection and dysuria. Rectal prolapse requiring surgical intervention developed in 25 (7.6%) of 330 patients. Anal stricture occurred in three patients and re-do anoplasty was performed 5 months after LAARP. Anal retraction occurred in two patients and re-pull-through was conducted at 5 and 6 days, respectively, after LAARP. 228 patients who were older than 3 years were followed up. The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (range 3-15 years). 217 patients (95.2%) had voluntary bowel movements; 202 patients (88.6%) were free from soiling or with grade 1 soiling; 30 patients (13.6%) and 25 patients (11.3%) suffered from grade 1 and grade 2 constipation, respectively, while no patient had grade 3 constipation. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates that the LAARP has advantages on rectal mobilization and resection, intra-rectal fistula closure and accurate tunnel formation in the LMT with minimal trauma. The improvement of the short-term and long-term outcomes after LAARP has been shown not only for high-type ARM but also for intermediate-type ARM.

Experiences of Rectovaginal Fistula in Anorectal Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are very rare malformations in females with anorectal malformations (ARMs). Here, we share the clinical features of RVF and report the long-term outcomes. METHODS: RVF patients were classified using a retrospective analysis of ARM patients who underwent operations at Seoul National University Hospital between January 1999 and May 2017. The Krickenbeck continence scoring system was used to evaluate bowel function 5 and 10 years after surgery. RESULTS: Of the total 460 ARM patients, 203 were female, 7 of whom were diagnosed with RVF. The median age and weight at the time of anorectoplasty were 292 days (range, 140-617) and 8.2 kg (range, 5.5-12), respectively. Six patients had associated anomalies and three patients underwent redo-anorectoplasty. Voluntary bowel movements were observed in 6 out of 7 patients at 5 and 10 years of age. Soiling was observed in all patients at the age of five years and in 6 out of 7 patients at the age of ten years. Constipation was observed in 6 out of 7 patients at both five and ten years of age. CONCLUSIONS: An RVF is a very rare malformation, accounting for 1.5% of total ARMs and 3.4% of ARMs in females. Long-term counseling, education, and guidance are needed for effective management of patients' bowel movements. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Scientific solution to a complex problem: physiology and multidisciplinary team improve understanding and outcome in chronic constipation and faecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of diagnostic credibility to direct focused management for children with chronic constipation (CC) and faecal incontinence (FI). The aim is to assess the impact of an innovative Children's Anorectal Physiology Service (CAPS) focusing on improving outcomes in children with CC/FI. METHODS: Prospective data: demographics, bowel and quality of life (QoL)/risk of distress questionnaires. Diagnostics: awake high-resolution anorectal manometry (AHRAM), endoanal ultrasound and transit marker studies (TMS). RESULTS: Total patients: 112; 66 males (59%); median 9 years (17 months to 16 years). Patient groups included: 89 (79%) had functional CC/FI; 9 (8%), Hirschsprung's disease; 12 (11%), anorectal malformations and 2 (2%), trauma. St Marks Incontinence score (SMIS) abnormal in 91 (81%) and Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) in 101 (90%) patients. Anorectal manometry: 94 (84%) awake and 18 (17%) under anaesthesia. Play specialist input 37 (33%) patients. AHRAM abnormal 65 (58%): sphincter dysfunction 36 (32%) and altered rectal sensation: hyposensitive 22% (20/91); 21% (19/91) hypersensitive. TMS normal in 64 (57%), 17 (15%) slow transit and 27 (24%) rectal evacuatory disorder. Risk of distress in 38% and poor QoL in 55% patients which correlated with abnormal SMIS (p = 0.02). Patient/parent satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Scientific investigations combined with multidisciplinary team improve patient satisfaction and reduces patient self-report illness severity. A complex problem requires a scientific solution.

Quality of life and defecative function 10 years or longer after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformation.

PURPOSE: In our center, patients with anorectal malformation, including males with recto-vesical (RV)/recto-bladder neck (RBN)/recto-prostatic urethral (RU) fistulas, and females with recto-vaginal (RV) fistulas have been treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) before 2000, and by laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) thereafter. We would like to compare the quality of life (QOL) and long-term defecative function between these two groups of patients 10 years after reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAARP between 2001 and 2005 were compared with historical controls treated with PSARP between 1996 and 2000. Degrees of continence were graded by the Krickenbeck classification and Kelly's score. QOL was assessed by Hirschsprung's disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life (HAQL) questionnaire. Results were compared using Chi-square test and t test. RESULTS: There were 14 LAARP and 7 PSARP patients. All attained voluntary bowel movements. Moderate to severe soiling (Krickenbeck Grade 2 and 3) was found in 3/14 LAARP (21.4%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 1.00. Constipation requiring use of laxatives was present in 3/14 LAARP (28.6%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 0.62. Mean Kelly's scores were 3.79 ± 0.98 (LAARP) and 4.71 ± 1.25 (PSARP), p = 0.12. No patient required Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE). The QOL scores based on the HAQL questionnaire were comparable between the two groups in all areas except social functioning, in which the LAARP patients attained a significantly lower mean score (26.4 vs 71.7, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The 10-year outcome between LAARP and PSARP patients in terms of QOL and defecative function is comparable. Impairment in social functioning in these patients is reflected by the self-reported lower level of functioning.

The change over time in the postoperative bowel function in male anorectal malformation patients who underwent sacroperineal anorectoplasty and sacroabdominoperineal anorectoplasty.

PURPOSE: Many kinds of operative procedures have been proposed for anorectal malformation (ARM) patients. At our institution, sacroperineal or sacroabdominoperineal anorectoplasty (SP-SAP) have been performed from 1984 to 2007. The aim of this study is clarify the change over the time in the postoperative bowel function in male ARM patients. METHODS: Patient data were collected from 1984 to 2007. Fifty-two male patients with high- and intermediate-type ARM were enrolled. The patients' characteristics and bowel function were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. The bowel function was evaluated according to the evacuation score (ES) of the Japan Society of ARM Study Group. RESULTS: The operative procedures were SP-SAP in 52 male patients. The total ES improved chronologically and significantly until 11 years of age. Regarding the clinical stratification of the ES, the ratio of "excellent" and "good" results was over 91.9% at 11 years of age. A satisfactory bowel movement score was achieved by 9 years of age. The constipation, incontinence and soiling scores improved slowly but continuously until 11 years of age. CONCLUSION: The ES showed continuous improvement after a definitive operation. An understanding of the characteristics of improvement is very important in managing the postoperative bowel function in ARM patients.

Anorectal Malformation: State of the Art in Translating Experimental Research to the Bedside.

The embryology of anorectal malformation (ARM) is a controversial issue. The study in humans is difficult due to the scarcity of fetuses with this anomaly. Therefore, ARM animal models, naturally obtained or induced by drugs, have been employed to understand physiopathology and possible treatments. Pigs, rabbits, rats, and mice have been employed as animal models. Additionally, many drugs have been used with this purpose: Etretinate, Ethylenethiourea, and Adriamycin. The animal more frequently used is the rat because of good reproducibility, low cost, and easy handling. Pig is a good model, but it is expensive, and difficult to handling and lodging. Concerning the drugs, Adriamycin promotes a more severe ARM compared with Ethylenethiourea. The models of ARM are of value in the understanding of the embryologic development. Nowadays, researches are aimed at identifying the molecular mechanism of this process, providing the basis for the application of tissue engineering in future experiments with ARM.

Diagnosis and management of a remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) in males following surgery for anorectal malformations.

PURPOSE: A complication of the surgical management of anorectal malformations (ARMs) is a retained remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) formerly called a posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD). A ROOF may have multiple presentations or may be incidentally discovered during the work-up of ARM after previous surgery. We sought to define the entity and the surgical indications for excision of a ROOF when found. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all male patients who presented to our center following previous repair for ARM at another institution, who came for evaluation of problems with urinary and/or fecal continence, from 2014 to 2017. Charts were reviewed for symptoms, original type of malformation, preoperative imaging, treatment, and postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Of 180 referred male patients, 16 had a ROOF. 14 underwent surgical repair to address this and for other redo indications, and 2 did not require intervention. 13 patients had an additional reason for a redo such as anal mislocation or rectal prolapse. Indications for ROOF excision were urinary symptoms (e.g. UTI, dribbling, passage of mucous via urethra, stone formation), to make a smoother posterior urethra for intermittent catheterization, or for prophylactic reasons. Patients were repaired at an average age of 4.2 years, using a PSARP only approach with excision of the ROOF for all except one patient who needed a laparotomy due to abdominal extension of the ROOF. No patient needed a colostomy. The original ARM repairs of the patients were PSARP (9), laparoscopic assisted (4) and abdominoperineal pullthrough (3). Preoperative evaluation included pelvic MRI, VCUG, and cystoscopy. The ROOF was visualized on 14 of 16 MRIs, 10 of 14 VCUGs, and 14 of 15 cystoscopies. Urinary symptoms associated with a ROOF and ease of catheterization were improved in all repaired cases. CONCLUSION: Patients not doing well from a urinary or bowel standpoint post ARM pull-through need a complete evaluation which should include a check for a ROOF. Both modalities MRI and cystoscopy are needed as a ROOF can be missed on either alone. A VCUG was not reliable in identifying a ROOF. Excision is needed in patients to improve urinary symptoms associated with these lesions and to minimize the small but theoretical oncologic risk present in a ROOF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Quality of life and functional outcome in Swedish children with low anorectal malformations: a follow-up study.

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the quality of life and bowel function in children with low anorectal malformations (ARM). ADDITIONAL AIM: To evaluate the Swedish version the Hirschsprung's Disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of life Questionnaire (HAQL). METHODS: Forty-four children and their parents were invited to complete the HAQL and the Bowel Function Score (BFS). Healthy children participated as controls and completed the HAQL. RESULTS: Seventeen children and 18 mothers completed the HAQL. The children reported impaired function in the physical symptom (PH) fecal continence (FC) and laxative diet (LD) domains compared to controls. Compared with their mothers, they reported impaired physical function and more symptoms in the emotional functioning (EMF) and PH domains. 27 families completed the BFS; 63% reported normal bowel function, 33% moderate outcome and one patient, comprising 4%, poor outcome. Evaluation of the HAQL, FC, EMF and PH domains showed no obvious conflicts. CONCLUSIONS: The children did not differ much regarding their QoL, even though they appeared to have impaired bowel function and worse emotional functioning compared to controls. The mothers underestimated their children's physical symptoms and overestimated their emotional functioning. Evaluated domains in the HAQL appear to work as intended, but the questionnaire needs further development.

Anorectal malformation & Hirschsprung's disease: A cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and bowel function to healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD) face long-term disturbance in bowel function even after definitive surgery. This study evaluates the quality of life (QOL) of patients with ARM and HD, and compares them to healthy controls using self-report questionnaires. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was performed recruiting patients with ARM or HD from September 2013 to December 2014 who had primary surgery done in our institution at least 2 years prior to participation. Age-matched and gender-matched controls were enrolled from our patients with minor outpatient complaints. All participants completed the following PedsQL™ scales (maximum score 100): 4.0 Generic Core Scales, 3.0 General Well-Being (GWB) Scale and 2.0 Family Impact (FI) Module. All were also scored on bowel function (BFS), with a maximum score 20. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed, with significance level <0.05. RESULTS: There were 193 participants: 87 controls, 62 ARM, 44 HD. When comparing Core, GWB and FI scores, there were no significant differences between groups although controls had best scores indicating best QOL and general wellbeing, with least impact of the child's health on the family. BFS was significantly different with controls having best and ARM worst scores. There were no significant differences in scores between parent and child indicating intradyad consistency. There was significant positive correlation between BFS and Core (p<0.0001), and between BFS and GWB scores (p<0.005); and significant negative correlation between BFS and FI scores (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bowel function impacts quality of life. Those with ARM and HD can achieve good quality of life comparable to controls, based on patient and caregiver self-reported outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Functional assessment of the patients with perineal and vestibular fistula treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP) has been a standardised operative treatment for anorectal malformation (ARM). This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate patients with perineal fistula (PF) and vestibular fistula (VF) treated by ASARP in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (PF, n = 14; male, n = 8 and female, n = 6 and VF, n = 6) were evaluated. Eighteen patients underwent primary ASARP without protective colostomy. Two patients underwent colostomy because of intestinal atresia and suspected of other type ARM. The age range of operation was from 4 months to 5.0 years. Sixteen patients (PF, n = 13; male, n = 7 and female n = 6 and VF, n = 3) over 3 years of age were evaluated according to the Krickenbeck classification. RESULTS: Operative complications occurred in one patient. Minor wound dehiscence occurred in six patients. Mucosal prolapse occurred in two patients. According to the Krickenbeck classification, amongst male patients with PF, all patients had voluntary bowel movements (VBMs) and two patients had Grade 1 soiling, while four patients had Grade 2 constipation. Amongst female patients with PF, all patients had VBM and no soiling, one patient had Grade 1 and two patients had Grade 2 constipation. In patients with VF, one patient was continent with Grade 1 soiling. One patient had Grade 2 and two patients had Grade 3 constipation. CONCLUSIONS: ASARP without colostomy carried a risk of wound dehiscence. The ASARP technique provided normal or moderate outcomes for VBM and soiling. However, in about half of patients, defecation management with laxative therapy was required to achieve a normal condition.

Assessing the long term manometric outcomes in patients with previous laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP).

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to compare the long term manometric outcomes in patients with previous laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). METHODS: This is a single-centered retrospective study and the participants were born with various types of anorectal malformation. Manometric assessment was carried out with high-resolution anorectomanometry performed as a day procedure. In addition, a seven-itemed bowel function score (BFS) was utilized to assess the functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in this study (PSARP=14, LARP=16) and the median follow up periods were 15.5years and 9years in the PSARP and LARP groups respectively (p=0.06). The median value of BFS was significantly lower in the PSARP group (PSARP=12.5, range: 8-18; LARP=16, range: 10-20, p=0.03). The median value of sphincteric resting pressure was 20mmHg (range: 10-50mmHg) in the PSARP group and 40mmHg (range: 10-70mmHg) in the LARP group (p=0.05). There was no significant difference in following measurements: the percentage of patient having a normal sphincteric resting pressure (PSARP vs LARP=50% vs 75%, p=0.28); the median sphincteric squeeze pressure (PSARP vs LARP=30mmHg, range: 10-100 vs 50mmHg, range: 20-140mmHg, p=0.08); the incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (PSARP vs LARP=42.9% vs 31.3%, p=0.14) and the median value for volume of air to elicit the first anal sensation (PSARP vs LARP=30ml, range: 20-60ml vs 40ml, range: 20-80ml, p=0.18). CONCLUSION: Anorectomanometry is a useful follow up study after anorectoplasty and majority of the patients with previous LARP could retain a normal sphincteric resting pressure during long term follow up. Comparing the two surgical approaches, patients with previous LARP could achieve a higher bowel function score as well as sphincter resting pressure in manometric assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Long-term bowel function, quality of life and sexual function in patients with anorectal malformations treated during the PSARP era.

Anorectal malformations are an important group of congenital anomalies that vary widely in their anatomical characteristics and complexity. Understanding the long-term functional outcomes after modern treatments, and how these compare to the general population, are essential for ensuring that patients receive optimal, evidence-based care. With increasing appreciation of the wider impact of the illness on patients and their families, minimizing social disability from fecal incontinence and enabling normal social integration from the outset are key management concerns. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the functional outcomes by type of malformation, reflecting on the literature, and our institutional experience over a follow-up period of nearly 30 years.

Clinical and urodynamic outcomes in children with anorectal malformation subtype of recto-bladder neck fistula.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) have a high incidence of genitourinary anomalies. Those with a recto-bladder neck fistula may represent a high-risk group, but their long-term urologic outcomes are poorly described. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and urodynamic outcomes in a large cohort of patients with an ARM subtype of recto-bladder neck fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who had been treated for a recto-bladder neck fistula at the present institution since 2007. The primary outcomes were the ability to achieve urinary continence after 4 years of age, and development of a mildly decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or worse (<89 ml/min/1.73 m2). Continence was defined as the ability to store urine for 3-4 h during the day and 8 h overnight without leakage. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical data are provided in the Summary Table. The most recent urodynamic findings included the presence of detrusor overactivity in 30 (75%) patients, median leak point pressure of 56.0 cmH2O (range, 14-140), median functional cystometric capacity at 40 cmH2O of 125.5% age-expected capacity (range, 36-473%), and median maximum cystometric capacity of 131.0% age-expected capacity (range, 44-473%). A mildly decreased GFR or worse developed in 13 (24%) patients. Of the 52 (78%) patients who were followed by pediatric urology at the present institution with a median follow-up of 30.9 months (range, 0.0-86.8), 35 (67%) were at least 4 years of age and could be assessed for continence. Continence was achieved in five (14%) patients voiding spontaneously and 15 (43%) performing CIC. Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) (OR 0.70, P = 0.006) were an independent predictor of incontinence, while urethral anomalies (OR 1.40, P = 0.03) were an independent predictor of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on multiple logistic regression analysis. DISCUSSION: The findings favorably compared with other studies, but were more robust due to the size of the cohort and breadth of urologic evaluation. Limitations included the retrospective design at a single institution. Incomplete clinical data and misclassification of continence may have lead to bias. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort of patients with an ARM subtype of recto-bladder neck fistula had a high incidence of genitourinary anomalies. They were rarely able to achieve continence with spontaneous voiding alone and were at risk of developing CKD, both of which were likely multifocal in origin. Long-term urologic follow-up is warranted for patients with a recto-bladder neck fistula.