Technology-Based Music Interventions to Reduce Anxiety and Pain Among Patients Undergoing Surgery or Procedures: Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients undergoing surgery or procedures may experience negative symptoms. Music is a nonpharmacological complementary approach and is used as an intervention to reduce anxiety, stress, and pain in these patients. Recently, music has been used conveniently in clinical situations with technology devices, and the mode of providing music is an important factor in technology-based music interventions. However, many reviews have focused only on the effectiveness of music interventions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of technology-based music interventions for reducing anxiety and pain among patients undergoing surgery or procedures. We examined the clinical situation, devices used, delivery methods, and effectiveness of technology-based music interventions in primary articles. METHODS: The search was performed in the following 5 electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE (OvidSP), CINAHL complete, PSYCINFO, and Embase. This systematic review focused on technology-based music interventions. The following articles were included: (1) RCTs, (2) studies using interactive technology (eg, smartphones, mHealth, tablets, applications, and virtual reality), (3) empirical studies reporting pain and anxiety outcomes, and (4) English articles published from 2018 to 2023 (as of January 18, 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. RESULTS: Among 292 studies identified, 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. Of these studies, 9 reported that anxiety scores decreased after music interventions and 7 reported that pain could be decreased before, during, and after procedures. The methodology of the music intervention was important to the results on anxiety and pain in the clinical trials. More than 50% (13/21, 62%) of the studies included in this review allowed participants to select themes themselves. However, it was difficult to distinguish differences in effects depending on the device or software used for the music interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Technology-based music interventions could help reduce anxiety and pain among patients undergoing surgery or procedures. The findings of this review could help medical teams to choose a practical methodology for music interventions. Future studies should examine the effects of advanced technology-based music interventions using smart devices and software that promote interactions between medical staff and patients.

Chinese Oral Cancer Patients' Pain Beliefs: An Application of Leventhal's Common-Sense Model.

BACKGROUND: Patients' pain beliefs are the main obstacle to effective pain management. Assessing and correcting negative perceptions is important for improving pain intensity and quality of life of patients with cancer pain. AIMS: To explore pain beliefs among oral cancer patients using the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation as a theoretical framework. The primary components of the model, cognitive representations, emotional representations, and coping responses, were examined. DESIGN: A qualitative method was used. SETTINGS: PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS:   METHODS: Semi-structured, qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted with patients newly diagnosed with oral cancer in a tertiary care hospital. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviews with 15 patients revealed that the pain beliefs of patients with oral cancer included three themes: pain cognitive representations of oral cancer, pain emotional representations of oral cancer, and pain coping responses. CONCLUSIONS: Negative pain beliefs are common among oral cancer patients. This novel application of the self-regulatory model demonstrates that it can be used to capture the key pain beliefs (i.e., cognitions, emotions, and coping responses) of oral cancer patients within a single, unifying framework.

The Effects of Anthroposophic Medicine in Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Background: The currently available evidence is unclear in regard to pain-related outcomes of patients with chronic pain conditions who undergo treatment with anthroposophic medicine (AM). Aim: To identify and synthesize the evidence in patients with chronic pain before and after AM therapy. Methods: The following databases and search interfaces were searched on October 21, 2021: Embase (via Embase.com), Medline (via PubMed), and the Cochrane Library. Additional references were identified via bibliographies of included studies. In at least one experimental arm that used anthroposophic therapy to treat chronic pain, AM treatments were required to be documented. Included studies reported on pain severity and physical and emotional functioning. Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and conducted the quality evaluation of the included studies based on the critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: Seven studies (eight publications) were included in the review, of which were three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two non-RCTs, and two pretest-post-test studies. A total number of 600 patients participated in the identified experimental studies, of whom all were adults. Three studies included patients with low back pain, one study each assessed patients with fibromyalgia, migraine, dysmenorrhea, and postpolio syndrome, respectively. The identified clinical studies reported considerable reductions in symptoms and effect sizes of pain outcomes after AM therapies being predominantly large, with no notable adverse effects. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review of studies assessing AM therapies in patients with chronic pain problems revealed that there is a scarcity of evidence currently available, with unclear effects of AM treatments in reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life in the evaluated health conditions. Although most of the studies revealed a favorable benefit on one or more pain-related outcomes, the variability of the research did not allow for generalization across different studies, health conditions, and populations.

Role of self-efficacy for pain management and pain catastrophizing in the relationship between pain severity and depressive symptoms in women with breast cancer and pain.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms through pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing in breast cancer patients with pain. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial investigating a cognitive-behavioral pain management protocol. SAMPLE: Females (N = 327) with stage I-III breast cancer and report of at least moderate pain. METHODS: Pain severity, pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and depressive symptoms were measured. The proposed model was assessed using structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Higher pain severity was significantly related to lower pain self-efficacy and higher pain catastrophizing. Lower pain self-efficacy and higher pain catastrophizing were significantly related to more depressive symptoms. Higher pain severity was significantly associated with more depressive symptoms through lower pain self-efficacy and higher pain catastrophizing. The association between pain severity and depressive symptoms was not significant when specified as a direct effect. CONCLUSION: Pain severity related to depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients via pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS: Measurement of pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing should be incorporated into comprehensive pain assessments for women with breast cancer, as these variables may be relevant therapeutic targets. Psychosocial symptom management interventions should include strategies that increase pain self-efficacy and decrease pain catastrophizing because these pain-related cognitive variables appear to drive the relationship between pain severity and depressive symptoms.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward cancer pain management amongst healthcare workers (physicians, pharmacists, and nurses): a cross-sectional study from first-tier cities in China.

PURPOSE: China is currently one of the countries with the largest increased number of new cancer cases in the world, but cancer pain management (CPM) is still inadequate. This study uses a questionnaire to demonstrate the status and differences in knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of CPM among healthcare workers (HCWs) in developed regions of China, to find deficiencies and priorities for improvement, from which areas and advantages of the role of pharmacists and mobile devices can be explored. METHODS: This study used data from a questionnaire on CPM from March to June 2019. The study population consisted of a total of 515 HCWs in four first-tier developed cities in China. The questionnaire has four major components, analysis of differences in KAP of different occupations through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Among the respondents, the physicians had the highest knowledge scores toward CPM, pharmacists had the lowest practice scores. Around half of the respondents indicated that their hospital or department have a pharmacist participating in CPM. Physicians and nurses were more likely to expect pharmacists to provide drug counseling. The HCWs interviewed most expect that the mobile-based pain management system can automatically screen and mark patients with pain. CONCLUSION: From this study, it can be suggested that pharmacists and nurses in the CPM team should actively promote relevant knowledge. Besides, pharmacists should focus on improving practical ability such as increasing the frequency of pain assessment. Multidisciplinary collaboration and the introduction of mobile devices can improve and refine the CPM.

Postoperative Opioid Utilization and Patient Satisfaction in General Surgery Procedures: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Wide variation of opioid prescribing persists despite attempts to quantify number of opioids utilized postoperatively. We aim to prospectively determine number of opioids used after common surgery procedures to guide future prescribing. METHODS: A prospective observational trial was performed of opioids prescribed and used postoperatively. Patients filled out pre- and postoperative surveys, and number of opioids utilized was captured at postoperative visit. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-thirteen patients met inclusion. Median opioids prescribed exceeded number of opioids taken for all procedures. Median number of opioids taken postoperatively was fewer than 10 for all categories of procedures: simple skin/soft tissue 2 (IQR 1-4), complex skin/soft tissue 1.5 (IQR 0-14), simple laparoscopy 1 (IQR 0-20) and complex laparoscopy 4 (IQR 0-20), laparotomy 0 (IQR 0-26), and open inguinal hernia 2 (IQR 0-2). Nearly 80% of patients had leftover opioids, and 31% planned to keep them. There was little difference between preoperative and postoperative level of satisfaction with a pain control regimen. DISCUSSION: Postoperatively, patients utilize opioids less frequently than prescribed and often keep leftover pills. Patient pain control satisfaction is unrelated to number of opioids prescribed and taken postoperatively.

How Is the Probability of Reporting Various Levels of Pain 12 Months After Noncatastrophic Injuries Associated with the Level of Peritraumatic Distress?

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors have been shown to be consistent predictors of chronic pain in people with musculoskeletal injuries. However, few prognostic studies have considered multiple risk factors including peritraumatic distress. In addition, previous research has not considered that the associations between peritraumatic distress and pain levels can vary across pain outcomes. QUESTION/PURPOSE: To determine whether an easily measurable level of baseline distress is associated with pain levels 1 year after noncatastrophic traumatic injuries when the outcome to be assessed is not normally distributed. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. The data were captured from two cohorts in London, Ontario, Canada, and Chicago, IL, USA. Participants were adults with acute noncatastrophic (that is, not treated with surgery or hospitalization) musculoskeletal injuries of any etiology with various injury locations (60% [145 of 241] spinal and 40% [96 of 241] peripheral) that presented to local urgent care centers. Other inclusion criteria included English/French speakers and having no other disorder that would affect their pain levels. In total, between the years 2015 and 2018, 241 participants were recruited based on the inclusion criteria. Ninety-three percent (225 of 241) of participants provided baseline data, and of these, 48% (109 of 225) were lost to follow-up in 1 year. Based on a complete case approach, this study included 116 participants who ranged in age from 18 to 66 years and 69% (80) of whom were women. The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) was used to evaluate distress at baseline (within 4 weeks of injury). The TIDS is a validated, reliable 12-item risk prognosis screening tool that takes less than 3 minutes to complete with questions regarding uncontrolled pain, negative affect, and intrusion/hyperarousal. The minimum and maximum possible scores are 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to assess the pain level at baseline and again 12 months postinjury. To complete the NPRS, participants rate the severity of their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. NPRS scores of 1 to 3 indicate mild pain, 4 to 6 indicate moderate pain and 7 or higher indicate severe pain. As a preliminary analysis, to assess whether the participants as a group experienced recovery, a paired samples t-test was used to compare NPRS scores at baseline and 12 months. In all, 52% (60 of 116) of participants reported no pain (NPRS = 0), and mean pain intensity scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.1 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.6 at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Quantile regression was used to describe the association between baseline distress and pain levels 1 year after the injury. This technique was used because it reveals the relationships at different quantiles of the pain outcome distribution. RESULTS: The results indicate some people (52% [60 of 116]) recovered regardless of their baseline level of distress (30th quantile of the NPRS: ß = 0). However, in those with persisting pain, higher levels of baseline distress are associated with greater levels of pain 12 months after the injury (50th quantile of the NPRS: ß = 0.11; p = 0.01; 70th quantile of the NPRS: ß = 0.27; p < 0.001; 90th quantile of the NPRS: ß = 0.31; p = 0.01). According to this model, with a baseline TIDS score of 5, there is 10% probability that patients will report moderate or greater levels of pain (4 or higher of 10) 12 months later. This probability then increases as the TIDS score increases. For instance, at a score of 13 on the TIDS, the probability of a patient reporting moderate or higher levels of pain increases to 30%, and the probability of reporting severe pain (higher than 6 of 10) is 10%. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and surgeons in orthopaedic settings can screen for the presence of peritraumatic distress using the TIDS, which is an easily administered tool that does not require extensive knowledge of psychology, and by using it they can identify those with higher levels of distress who are more likely to have persistent, long-term pain. A score of 4 or less indicates a low risk of persistent pain, a score between 5 and 12 (endpoints included) indicates moderate risk, and a score of 13 or higher indicates high risk. Future studies should investigate whether certain immediate interventions for peritraumatic distress in the aftermath of trauma can decrease the likelihood that a patient will develop chronic pain after injury. As an analysis technique, quantile regression is useful to assess complex associations in many orthopaedic settings in which a certain outcome is expected to occur in most patients leading to non-normally distributed data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Manejo da dor durante a punção arterial no neonato: estudo descritivo / Manejo del dolor durante la punción arterial en neonatos: estudio descriptivo / Pain management during arterial puncture in newborns: a descriptive study

RESUMO Objetivo descrever as medidas de alívio da dor aplicadas pela equipe de enfermagem durante a punção arterial no neonato e os escores de dor no momento do procedimento. Método estudo descritivo, quantitativo, realizado entre outubro de 2018 e janeiro de 2019, em uma unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal no Noroeste do Paraná, por meio da observação não participantes de 192 punções arteriais, com respectiva mensuração dos escores de dor. O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa com Seres Humanos. Resultados das 192 punções somente 34 foram analisadas quanto às medidas de alívio e escores de dor, os quais se mostraram elevados. As demais punções foram excluídas, devido perda da monitorização durante o procedimento. Conclusão evidenciou-se pouco uso de intervenções relacionadas ao alívio da dor por parte da equipe. O processo de observação constatou a presença de dor intensa.

RESUMEN Objetivo describir las medidas de alivio del dolor aplicadas por el equipo de enfermería durante la punción arterial en neonatos y las escalas de puntuación de dolor en el momento del procedimiento. Método estudio descriptivo, cuantitativo, realizado entre octubre de 2018 y enero de 2019, en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales del noroeste de Paraná, mediante observación no participante de 192 punciones arteriales, con medición respectiva de puntuaciones de dolor. El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética para la Investigación con Seres Humanos. Resultados de las 192 punciones, solo 34 fueron analizadas en cuanto a las medidas de alivio y puntuaciones de dolor que fueron elevadas. Se excluyeron las otras punciones debido a la pérdida del monitoreo durante el procedimiento. Conclusión el equipo utilizó poco las intervenciones relacionadas con el alivio del dolor. El proceso de observación verificó la presencia de dolor intenso.

ABSTRACT Objective to describe pain relief measures applied by the nursing team during arterial puncture in neonates, and pain scores during the procedure. Method this descriptive, quantitative study was conducted between October 2018 and January 2019 at a neonatal intensive care unit in northwestern Paraná, by non-participant observation of 192 arterial punctures and measurement of the respective pain scores. The study was approved by the human research ethics committee. Results of the 192 punctures, only 34 were examined for relief measures and pain scores; the latter were found to be high. The other punctures were excluded for loss of monitoring during the procedure. Conclusion pain-relief interventions were little used by the team. The observation process found intense pain.

The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of virtual reality application during a colonoscopy on the pain and anxiety experienced by patients. METHODS: The study was conducted as experimental, randomized, controlled research. The study was carried out between October 15, 2017 and May 20, 2018 in the Endoscopy Unit of a Public Hospital in northern Turkey. The study sample consisted of 60 patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patients were divided into 2 groups by using simple randomization. The patients in the experimental group watched virtual reality applications during colonoscopy, whereas the patients in the control group underwent standard colonoscopy protocol. Colonoscopy was performed on patients in both groups by the same gastroenterologist without the use of anesthesia. The demographic data of both groups, pain levels during and after the procedure, before and after the procedure anxiety levels were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the experimental group was 56.33 ± 11.81, the mean age of the patients in the control group was 56.20 ± 15.62. There was no statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-operative state anxiety score averages of the patients in the experimental and control groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the trait anxiety scores (P < .000) and pain scores (P < .03) during the procedure between both groups. CONCLUSION: The virtual reality application was found to reduce patients' pain during the colonoscopy procedure. The virtual reality application, an easily available, inexpensive, and non-invasive method, can be used by nurses in pain management during colonoscopy.

Women's experiences of an enhanced recovery after surgery program: A qualitative study.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program aims to transfer much of the responsibility for postoperative recovery to the patient and their next of kin. The aim of the study was to identify and describe women's experiences of care within this program in relation to gynecological abdominal surgery. A qualitative approach was used where 16 women were interviewed within 1 to 2 weeks of their surgery. A thematic analysis focusing on interpretation of latent content was performed. Three themes were identified: Empowerment, Self-care, and Participation. Empowerment represents aspects of the recovery program that strengthen self-efficacy, such as being seen, being given information, and continuity of care. Self-care identifies the practical implications of empowerment, namely internal resources, knowledge, and external resources. These two themes were identified as separate but interlinked through the theme Participation. Preoperative information, postoperative encouragement, and follow-up empowered the women in their recovery. Early discharge from hospital was beneficial for recovery if accompanied by social support and sufficient self-care ability. A desire for a person-centered approach in the preoperative meeting and in postoperative care was identified.

Watching Videos of Colonoscopies and Receiving Interpretations Reduce Pain and Anxiety While Increasing the Satisfaction of Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with colonoscopies is a major barrier to patients participating in colorectal cancer screenings. While sedation and analgesia are used to reduce pain during the procedure, they are associated with increased complications and costs. Thus, it is necessary to identity novel techniques to relieve pain in a safe and cost-effective way. AIMS: To test whether watching real-time videos of colonoscopies while receiving detailed interpretations of the procedures reduces pain and anxiety and increases a patient's satisfaction. METHODS: Patients were randomized into three groups including a group who watched real-time videos of their colonoscopies (Group A), a group who watched real-time videos of their colonoscopies while receiving detailed interpretations of the procedures from the endoscopists (Group B), and a group who did not receive either method (Group C). RESULTS: Pain and anxiety scores were significantly (Group A vs. Group C, [Formula: see text]; Group B vs. Group C, [Formula: see text]) lower in Groups A and B compared to Group C. Additionally, significantly (Group A vs. Group C, [Formula: see text]; Group B vs. Group C, [Formula: see text]) increased satisfaction was observed in Groups A and B compared to Group C. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the pain and anxiety scores when comparing Groups A and B. However, the overall satisfaction score was significantly ([Formula: see text]) higher in Group B compared to Group A. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time videos of colonoscopies as well as videos along with detailed interpretations of the procedures decrease pain and anxiety while improving satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopies without sedation. Videos combined with interpretations lead to a greater increase in patient satisfaction.

Large reduction in opioid prescribing by a multipronged behavioral intervention after major urologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a pivotal role in combating the opioid crisis that currently grips the United States. Changing surgeon behavior is difficult, and the degree to which behavioral science can steer surgeons toward decreased opioid prescribing is unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, single-arm, pre- and postintervention study examining the prescribing of opioids by urologists for adult patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the quantity of opioids prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) after hospital discharge. The primary exposure was a multipronged behavioral intervention designed to decrease opioid prescribing. The intervention had 3 components: 1) formal education, 2) individual audit feedback, and 3) peer comparison performance feedback. There were 3 phases to the study: a pre-intervention phase, an intervention phase, and a washout phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients underwent prostatectomy, and 306 patients underwent nephrectomy. The median OMEs decreased from 195 to 19 in the prostatectomy patients and from 200 to 0 in the nephrectomy patients (P < .05 for both). The median OMEs prescribed did not increase during the washout phase. Prostatectomy patients discharged with opioids had higher levels of anxiety than patients discharged without opioids (P < .05). Otherwise, prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients discharged with and without opioids did not differ in their perception of postoperative pain management, activity levels, psychiatric symptoms, or somatic symptoms (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multipronged behavioral intervention significantly reduced opioid prescribing for patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy without compromising patient-reported outcomes.

Crossroad decisions in deep endometriosis treatment options: a qualitative study among patients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the experiences, considerations, and motivations of patients with endometriosis in the decision-making process for deep endometriosis (DE) treatment options. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth focus group methodology. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 19 Dutch women diagnosed with DE between 27 and 47 years of age. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Focus group topics were disease impact and motives for treatment, expectations of the treatment process, and important factors in the decision process. RESULT(S): Women reported that pain, fertility, and strong fear of complications are important decisive factors in the treatment process. The goal of conceiving a child is considered important, however, sometimes doctors emphasize this topic too much. It emerged that complication counseling is frequently about surgical complications, whereas side effects of hormonal treatments are neglected. Shared decision making and information about treatment options, complications, and side effects are not always optimal, making it difficult to make a well-considered choice. Despite negative experiences encountered after surgery, the positive effect of surgery ensures that most women do not regret their choice. CONCLUSION(S): In the treatment decision process for patients with DE, pain is almost always the most important decisive factor. The wish to conceive and strong fear of complications can change this choice. Doctors should understand the importance of fertility for the majority of women, but, also, if this is not considered paramount, respect that view. To improve shared decision making, exploration of treatment goals, training of healthcare providers, and better patient information provision are desirable.

Pain Management Experiences Among Hospitalized Postcraniotomy Brain Tumor Patients.

BACKGROUND: Brain tumors account for the majority of central nervous system tumors, and most are removed by craniotomies. Many postcraniotomy patients experience moderate or severe pain after surgery, but patient perspectives on their experiences with pain management in the hospital have not been well described. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe how patients who have undergone a craniotomy for brain tumor removal experience pain management while hospitalized. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methods using semistructured interviews were conducted with patients on a neurological step-down unit in an urban teaching hospital in the Midwest United States. Interviews focused on how patients experienced postcraniotomy pain and how it was managed. Narratives were analyzed with standard content analytic procedures. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants (median age, 58.5 years; interquartile range, 26-41 years; range, 21-83 years) were interviewed. The majority were white (n = 25) and female (n = 15) and had an anterior craniotomy (n = 25) with sedation (n = 17). Their pain experiences varied on 2 dimensions: salience of pain during recovery and complexity of pain management. Based on these dimensions, 3 distinct types of pain management experiences were identified: (1) pain-as-nonsalient, routine pain management experience; (2) pain-as-salient, routine pain management experience; and (3) pain-as-salient, complex pain management experience. CONCLUSIONS: Many postcraniotomy patients experience their pain as tolerable and/or pain management as satisfying and effective; others experience pain and pain management as challenging. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinicians should be attuned to needs of patients with complex pain management experiences and should incorporate good patient/clinician communication.

Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence from randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of hospital clowns for a range of symptom clusters in children and adolescents admitted to hospital with acute and chronic conditions. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, ISI of Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct, Scopus, American Psychological Association PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials were peer reviewed using the following eligibility criteria: children and adolescents who were admitted to hospital for acute conditions or chronic disorders, studies comparing use of hospital clowns with standard care, and studies evaluating the effect of hospital clowns on symptom management of inpatient children and adolescents as a primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. Methodological appraisal was assessed by two investigators independently using the Jadad scale, the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RoB 2), and the risk of bias in non-randomised studies (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomised controlled trials. RESULTS: 24 studies (n=1612) met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and analysis. Most studies were randomised controlled trials (n=13). Anxiety was the most frequently analysed symptom (n=13), followed by pain (n=9), psychological and emotional responses and perceived wellbeing (n=4), stress (n=4), cancer related fatigue (n=3), and crying (n=2). Five studies used biomarkers, mainly cortisol, to assess stress or fatigue outcome following hospital clowns. Most of the randomised controlled trials (n=11; 85%) were rated as showing some concerns, and two trials were rated with a high risk of bias. Most non-randomised controlled trials (n=6; 55%) were rated with a moderate risk of bias according to ROBINS-I tool. Studies showed that children and adolescents who were in the presence of hospital clowns, either with or without a parent present, reported significantly less anxiety during a range of medical procedures, as well as improved psychological adjustment (P<0.05). Three studies that evaluated chronic conditions showed favourable results for the intervention of hospital clowns with significant reduction in stress, fatigue, pain, and distress (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the presence of hospital clowns during medical procedures, induction of anaesthesia in the preoperative room, and as part of routine care for chronic conditions might be a beneficial strategy to manage some symptom clusters. Furthermore, hospital clowns might help improve psychological wellbeing in admitted children and adolescents with acute and chronic disorders, compared with those who received only standard care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107099.

Effect of therapeutic suggestions during general anaesthesia on postoperative pain and opioid use: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of therapeutic suggestions played to patients through earphones during surgery on postoperative pain and opioid use. DESIGN: Blinded randomised controlled study. SETTING: Five tertiary care hospitals in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 385 of 400 patients consecutively recruited from January to December 2018 who were to undergo surgery for 1-3 hours under general anaesthesia. In the per protocol analysis 191 patients were included in the intervention group and 194 patients in the control group. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised an audiotape of background music and positive suggestions based on hypnotherapeutic principles, which was played repeatedly for 20 minutes followed by 10 minutes of silence to patients through earphones during general anaesthesia. Patients in the control group were assigned to a blank tape. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was dose of opioid administered by patient controlled analgesia or nurse controlled analgesia within the first postoperative 24 hours, based on regular evaluation of pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (range 0-10, with higher scores representing more severe pain). RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the intervention group required a significantly (P=0.002) lower opioid dose within 24 hours after surgery, with a median of 4.0 mg (interquartile range 0-8) morphine equivalents versus 5.3 (2-12), and an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.56). The number of patients who needed opioids postoperatively was significantly (P=0.001) reduced in the intervention group: 121 of 191 (63%, 95% confidence interval 45% to 70%) patients in the intervention group versus 155 of 194 (80%, 74% to 85%) in the control group. The number needed to treat to avoid postoperative opioids was 6. Pain scores were consistently and significantly lower in the intervention group within 24 hours after surgery, with an average reduction of 25%. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic suggestions played through earphones during general anaesthesia could provide a safe, feasible, inexpensive, and non-drug technique to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use, with the potential for more general use. Based on the finding of intraoperative perception by a considerable number of patients, surgeons and anaesthetists should be careful about background noise and conversations during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00013800.

Modular transitional nursing intervention improves pain-related self-management for cancer patients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of modular transitional nursing intervention on the improvement of self-management of the patients with cancer pain. METHOD: This study will be conducted from March 2021 to May 2022 at Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University. The experiment was granted through the Research Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University (4348-019). Eighty patients are analyzed in our study. The patients will be included if they are between 18 and 70 years old and are diagnosed with cancer, the pain intensity score on moderate level, the pain lasts for more than 3 days, and the patients who have signed the written informed consent. While the patients will be excluded if they have a documented history of drug or alcohol abuse, and patients with limited performance, and patients have a surgery in the past 3 days. The primary result mainly expresses as intergroup differences in self-management disorders (Barriers Questionnaire-II) associated with the cancer pain. And the secondary results include the quality of life (QOL) and pain intensity. All the analyses are implemented with SPSS for Windows Version 20.0. RESULTS: Table 1 will show the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A modular transitional nursing intervention appears to reduce pain in cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: researchregistry6262.

Assessment of Patient's Satisfaction and Associated Factors regarding Postoperative Pain Management at the University of Gondar Compressive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Objective: We aimed to assess the level of patient's satisfaction and associated factors regarding postoperative pain management. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2018 at the University of Gondar, and comprehensive specialized hospital data were collected through semistructured questionnaire and chart review. Level of satisfaction was measured using five-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 23. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done. Variables of P value ≤0.2 in the bivariable analysis were a candidate for multivariable logistic regression. A P value ≤0.05 was considered as significantly associated with patient's level of satisfaction at 95% CI. Results: A total of 418 patients were included in this study with a response rate of 98.58%. The overall proportion of patients who were satisfied with pain management services was 72.2% (95% CI: 67.7-76.6). ASA1 (AOR = 3.55: 95% CI = 1.20-10.55) and ASA2 patients (AOR = 3.72: 95% CI = 1.04-13.28), absence of postoperative pain (AOR = 1.86: 95% CI = 1.02-3.39), peripheral nerve block done (AOR = 9.14: 95% CI = 3.93 20.86), received analgesic before request (AOR = 6.90: 95% CI = 3.72-12.83), and received systemic analgesics (AOR = 6.10: 95% CI = 1.17-33.91) were significantly associated with the level of satisfaction. Conclusion: The level of patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was considerably low. Hence, it is vital to implement time-interval pain assessment method during the first 24 hours of postoperative period and treat accordingly based on the WHO pain ladder. Moreover, we suggested that all patients who underwent major surgery should receive peripheral nerve block as part of multimodal analgesia to decrease the incidence and severity of post op pain.