Characteristics and Price Increases Among Sole-Source, Off-Patent Drugs in the United States, 2008 to 2018.

Importance: Some sole-source, off-patent drugs in the United States have undergone substantial price hikes in recent years. Despite increased attention by lawmakers, there are limited data to guide policy. Objectives: To describe key attributes of sole-source, off-patent, off-exclusivity drugs; to characterize the prevalence of price increases; and to identify attributes associated with price increases. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 300 sole-source, off-patent, off-exclusivity drug products met inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Attributes were identified from multiple sources, and yearly wholesale acquisition cost prices were determined from First Databank. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association of drug attributes with the following 2 price change thresholds was measured after adjusting for inflation: 25% or more price increase in a calendar year (wholesale acquisition cost) and 50% or more price increase in a calendar year. The rate of annual price increase over time was also measured. Results: Of the 300 drug products and 2242 observations analyzed, the overall inflation-adjusted mean increase in drug prices was 8.8% (95% CI, 7.8%-9.8%) per year. Ninety-five drugs (31.7%) increased by 25% or more during any calendar year, and 66 drugs (22.0%) increased by 50% or more during any calendar year. An initial price of less than $2 per unit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.36; 95% CI, 1.69-3.29), antineoplastic and immunomodulatory class (aOR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.31-5.65), dermatologic class (aOR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.80-4.84), oral route (aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.45-2.79), and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval before 1990 (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.03) were attributes of drugs that were more likely to be associated with a 25% or more price increase in a calendar year after adjusting for by initial price. Similarly, an initial price of less than $2 per unit (aOR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.76-4.09), antineoplastic and immunomodulatory class (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.54-6.12), oral route of administration (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.60), and FDA approval before 1990 (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94) were attributes of drugs that were more likely to be associated with a 50% or more price increase in a calendar year after adjusting for by initial price. Price increases of 25% or more were most common in 2014, and price increases of 50% or more were most common in 2013. Conclusions and Relevance: Price increases among sole-source, off-patent drugs are common, and policy interest in this practice is warranted. These findings should inform state drug pricing legislation.

Biosimilars in Oncology in the United States: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: Biosimilars are biological medicines that contain a highly similar version of the active substance of an already approved biologic reference product. The availability of biosimilars might provide an opportunity to lower health care expenditures as a result of the inherent price competition with their reference product. Understanding how biosimilar cancer drugs are regulated, approved, and paid for, as well as their impact in a value-based care environment, is essential for physicians and other stakeholders in oncology. OBSERVATIONS: Important structural and regulatory differences exist between biosimilar and generic medications. Minor differences in clinically inactive components with no clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference biologic are allowed. A biosimilar uses the same mechanism of action as the reference biologic, and its condition of use is the same as the approved indication, although extrapolation is permitted across indications under regulatory guidance. A biosimilar has to have a similar route of administration, dosage, and strength as the reference biologic. As patent expiration of multiple cancer biologics will occur in the next few years, more biosimilars might enter the market. Whether the approval and use of biosmilars as replacements for these heavily prescribed reference biologics will ultimately lead to cost savings is unknown and requires longer follow-up. Two biosimilars with an oncology supportive care indication are currently approved in the United States; both are myeloid growth factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The financial impact of generic drug competition can be dramatic, but significant differences in regulatory and development processes between generics and biosimilars limit such comparisons and likely present significant challenges for biosimilar approval and adoption in the US market. However, a value-based care environment and their cost-savings potential make biosimilars an attractive option for the therapeutic arsenal. Oncologists' understanding of biosimilars is critical to moving forward.

Proton pump inhibitors while belonging to the same family of generic drugs show different anti-tumor effect.

CONTEXT: Tumor acidity represents a major cause of chemoresistance. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can neutralize tumor acidity, sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the anti-tumor efficacy of different PPIs in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro experiments PPIs anti-tumor efficacy in terms of cell proliferation and cell death/apoptosis/necrosis evaluation were performed. In vivo PPIs efficacy experiments were carried out using melanoma xenograft model in SCID mice. RESULTS: Lansoprazole showed higher anti-tumor effect when compared to the other PPIs. The lansoprazole effect lasted even upon drug removal from the cell culture medium and it was independent from the lipophilicity of the PPIs formulation. DISCUSSION: These PPIs have shown different anti-tumoral efficacy, and the most effective at low dose was lansoprazole. CONCLUSION: The possibility to contrast tumor acidity by off-label using PPIs opens a new field of oncology investigation.

Relevance of variation in use of terminology to define generic pharmaceutical products / Relevancia de la variación en el uso de la terminología para definir los medicamentos genéricos

The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the use of generic drug policies to foster competition in the pharmaceutical sector, reduce drug prices, and increase access to therapeutic drugs. However, little is known about how countries implement these policies. This article describes different terminology adopted by national regulatory authorities to define generic versus proprietary drug products in developing countries, including those in Latin America, and challenges that arise in their application of WHO guidelines, such as labeling issues. The author concludes that variation in generics terminology in these countries is a result of institutional context (i.e., the public sector setting as well as the body of laws and regulations that exists in the country) and policy legacies, such as intellectual property regimes, and highlights the need for further analysis of pharmaceutical regulations to improve understanding of the barriers and political implications of generic drug policies.

La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) promueve el uso de políticas de medicamentos genéricos para estimular la competencia en el sector farmacéutico, reducir los precios y aumentar el acceso a los medicamentos. Sin embargo, hay poca información sobre la aplicación de dichas políticas por parte de los países. Este artículo describe la terminología empleada por los organismos regulatorios nacionales para definir los medicamentos genéricos frente a las especialidades farmacéuticas de marca en los países en desarrollo, incluidos los de América Latina, así como las dificultades que se encuentran en la aplicación de las directrices de la OMS, como por ejemplo en el etiquetado. El autor llega a la conclusión de que la variación en la terminología de los medicamentos genéricos en estos países es resultado del contexto institucional (es decir, el sector público y el ordenamiento jurídico-administrativo del país) y de los legados de las políticas, como los regímenes de propiedad intelectual, y destaca la necesidad de analizar más a fondo los reglamentos farmacéuticos a fin de conocer mejor los obstáculos y las implicaciones de las políticas en materia de medicamentos genéricos.

Biopharmaceutics classification system-based biowaivers for generic oncology drug products: case studies.

Establishing bioequivalence (BE) of drugs indicated to treat cancer poses special challenges. For ethical reasons, often, the studies need to be conducted in cancer patients rather than in healthy volunteers, especially when the drug is cytotoxic. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) introduced by Amidon (1) and adopted by the FDA, presents opportunities to avoid conducting the bioequivalence studies in humans. This paper analyzes the application of the BCS approach by the generic pharmaceutical industry and the FDA to oncology drug products. To date, the FDA has granted BCS-based biowaivers for several drug products involving at least four different drug substances, used to treat cancer. Compared to in vivo BE studies, development of data to justify BCS waivers is considered somewhat easier, faster, and more cost effective. However, the FDA experience shows that the approval times for applications containing in vitro studies to support the BCS-based biowaivers are often as long as the applications containing in vivo BE studies, primarily because of inadequate information in the submissions. This paper deliberates some common causes for the delays in the approval of applications requesting BCS-based biowaivers for oncology drug products. Scientific considerations of conducting a non-BCS-based in vivo BE study for generic oncology drug products are also discussed. It is hoped that the information provided in our study would help the applicants to improve the quality of ANDA submissions in the future.

In vitro release of diclofenac diethylamine from gels: evaluation of generic semisolid drug products in Brazil

In order for the pharmacological action of a topical dermal drug product to occur, the drug must first be released from the vehicle to be available to penetrate the skin layers and reach the site of action. Drug release is mainly dependent on the characteristics of the formulation. Currently, to register a generic or a similar drug product in Brazil performance testing of topical drug products for local action is not required. In this context, this aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro release of commercial diclofenac diethylamine gel products available on the Brazilian pharmaceutical market, using the vertical diffusion cell method. Factors which may influence the test, such as the type of membrane used, and the effect of the formulation characteristics on the diffusion rate were evaluated. Brazilian legislation currently allows generic drug products to contain excipients other than the reference drug, which may affect the drug release from the vehicle. Only one of the four generic drug products tested could be considered equivalent to the reference Cataflam Emulgel®. The cellulose acetate and polyethersulfone membranes tested were found to be interchangeable in the in vitro release studies carried out on this product.

Para exercer ação farmacológica, medicamentos tópicos de aplicação cutânea precisam, primeiramente, liberar o fármaco do veículo, para que desta forma ele se torne disponível para penetração nas camadas da pele, até atingir seu local de ação. A liberação do fármaco do veículo depende principalmente das características da formulação. Até a presente data, para registrar um medicamento genérico ou similar no Brasil não se exigem testes de desempenho para produtos tópicos de ação local. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a liberação in vitro de especialidades farmacêuticas de diclofenaco dietilamônio gel do mercado farmacêutico brasileiro, usando o sistema de célula de difusão vertical. Avaliaram-se fatores que influenciam o teste como o tipo de membrana usada nos ensaios de liberação e características da formulação que impactam a velocidade de difusão. A legislação vigente no País permite que medicamentos genéricos contenham excipientes diferentes do medicamento referência. Esta diferença afetou a liberação do fármaco do veículo. Dos quatro medicamentos genéricos testados apenas um seria considerado equivalente ao medicamento referência Cataflam Emulgel®. As membranas de acetato de celulose e polietersulfona testadas apresentaram-se intercambiáveis nos estudos de liberação desse produto.

Clasificación terapéutica de genéricos / Therapeutic classification of generic

El presente trabajo contiene la clasificación Terapéutica de los Genéricos con sus respectivos farmacos representativos y estos a su vez se dan a conocer en lo que se refiere a su grupo terapéutico, indicaciones, dosis, acciones, reacciones, adversas, , contradicciones, interacciones, y observaciones y cuidados de enfermería. La enfermera como parte del personal de ssalud lleva consigo una gran responsabilidad de administrar fármacos por lo que se ve en la obligación de estar informada sobre los mismos, ya que de esto depende la vida de un ser humano que confía en nosotras.

Medicamentos genericos versus originales / Generic drugs versus brand name medications

La literatura médica muestra una cantidad enorme de estudios comparativos entre medicamentos genérico y originales. El área médica directamente relacionada com este tema es la farmacologica. Recientimente fue publicado um artículo donde farmacólogos intentan educar a los médicos sobre los medicamentos genéricos...