Towards a generic prototyping approach for therapeutically-relevant peptides and proteins in a cell-free translation system.

Advances in peptide and protein therapeutics increased the need for rapid and cost-effective polypeptide prototyping. While in vitro translation systems are well suited for fast and multiplexed polypeptide prototyping, they suffer from misfolding, aggregation and disulfide-bond scrambling of the translated products. Here we propose that efficient folding of in vitro produced disulfide-rich peptides and proteins can be achieved if performed in an aggregation-free and thermodynamically controlled folding environment. To this end, we modify an E. coli-based in vitro translation system to allow co-translational capture of translated products by affinity matrix. This process reduces protein aggregation and enables productive oxidative folding and recycling of misfolded states under thermodynamic control. In this study we show that the developed approach is likely to be generally applicable for prototyping of a wide variety of disulfide-constrained peptides, macrocyclic peptides with non-native bonds and antibody fragments in amounts sufficient for interaction analysis and biological activity assessment.

Generic Price Competition For Specialty Drugs: Too Little, Too Late?

The case of generic imatinib demonstrates several potential barriers to effective generic price competition for specialty prescription drugs, including fewer market entrants, smaller-than-expected price reductions, shifts in prescribing toward more expensive brand-name treatments, and limited uptake of the generic product.

Compositional differences between Copaxone and Glatopa are reflected in altered immunomodulation ex vivo in a mouse model.

Copaxone (glatiramer acetate, GA), a structurally and compositionally complex polypeptide nonbiological drug, is an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis, with a well-established favorable safety profile. The short antigenic polypeptide sequences comprising therapeutically active epitopes in GA cannot be deciphered with state-of-the-art methods; and GA has no measurable pharmacokinetic profile and no validated pharmacodynamic markers. The study reported herein describes the use of orthogonal standard and high-resolution physicochemical and biological tests to characterize GA and a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved generic version of GA, Glatopa (USA-FoGA). While similarities were observed with low-resolution or destructive tests, differences between GA and USA-FoGA were measured with high-resolution methods applied to an intact mixture, including variations in surface charge and a unique, high-molecular-weight, hydrophobic polypeptide population observed only in some USA-FoGA lots. Consistent with published reports that modifications in physicochemical attributes alter immune-related processes, genome-wide expression profiles of ex vivo activated splenocytes from mice immunized with either GA or USA-FoGA showed that 7-11% of modulated genes were differentially expressed and enriched for immune-related pathways. Thus, differences between USA-FoGA and GA may include variations in antigenic epitopes that differentially activate immune responses. We propose that the assays reported herein should be considered during the regulatory assessment process for nonbiological complex drugs such as GA.

Science of Biosimilars.

Biosimilar therapeutic proteins in oncology offer the potential to decrease costs while providing safety and efficacy profiles consistent with their respective reference or originator products. Biosimilars have a number of important differences from generic small-molecule drugs, including manufacturing processes that are unique from their reference products. These differences may affect biosimilars through posttranslational modifications that can occur in specific cellular production lines, and these modifications have potential effects on protein structure, function, clinical pharmacology, and immunogenicity. Regulatory agencies expect these differences to be identified, analyzed, and minimized through iterative processes and extensive preclinical efforts. Generic naming of biosimilars reflects the nonproprietary reference product name along with a meaningless four-letter suffix to ensure that each product can be uniquely identified for prescribing and pharmacovigilance purposes. Labeling information for biosimilars reflects a greater detail of comparisons to reference products than conventional generic drugs, which ensures that prescribers can understand the source of information and have a complete understanding of the therapeutic profile of each biosimilar agent. Postmarketing surveillance programs will be required to evolve and ensure optimal pharmacovigilance reporting, because the potential for unexpected adverse events with biosimilars is higher than with conventional generic agents as a result of different manufacturing processes and different clinical trial designs and durations. The existing filgrastim biosimilars are likely to be joined soon by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab, on the basis of patent expiration dates and clinical trial results.

Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of generic Tacrobell with original tacrolimus (Prograf) in kidney transplant recipients.

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a generic tacrolimus (Tacrobell [TCB]) compared to the original tacrolimus (Prograf [PGF]) in kidney transplant recipients. In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data from 444 patients who took TCB as a first-line immunosuppressive drug and 245 patients who took PGF. The 5-year graft survival rate was 92% for patients in the PGF group and 97% for patients in the TCB group, respectively. Cox proportional hazards for a one-sided, noninferiority model showed noninferiority (upper confidence interval [CI] limit of the hazard ratio [HR]<1.2) for TCB compared to PGF (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0-1.14). The 5-year patient survival rate was 96% for patients in the PGF group and 97% for patients in the TCB group. Cox proportional hazards for a one-sided, noninferiority model showed noninferiority (upper confidence interval limit of the HR<2.0) for TCB compared to PGF (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0-1.95). The 5-year acute rejection-free graft survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (TCB 67%, PGF 68.8%; P=0.6286). The incidence of adverse events including adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, malignancies, new-onset diabetes after transplantation, and infection events did not differ significantly between the two groups. We conclude that TCB is a comparable alternative to the original tacrolimus as a first-line immunosuppressive drug. Producers of generics should support further study of their products after approval to assure physicians of their efficacy and safety.

Bioequivalence of Branded and Generic Oxaliplatin: From Preclinical Assessment to Clinical Incidence of Hypersensitivity Reactions.

BACKGROUND: Generic anticancer drugs represent an opportunity in terms of cost savings but there are some concerns about their tolerability. The safety profiles of generic versus branded oxaliplatin formulations have never been studied in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested in vitro concentrations, stability and efficacy of branded versus generic oxaliplatin formulations, then we retrospectively collected data about hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) of 427 colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. RESULTS: No significant difference in oxaliplatin concentration or time-dependent antiproliferative activity between branded and generic oxaliplatin was detected. The incidence of HSR was 12.1% (33/273 patients) in those treated with branded and 9.8% (15/154 patients) in those treated with generic oxaliplatin (p=0.46). The occurrence of grade III-IV HSRs and severe HSRs leading to oxaliplatin discontinuation were comparable. CONCLUSION: No difference between generic and branded formulations of oxaliplatin were demonstrated in preclinical nor in clinical settings. Generic oxaliplatin can be considered a safe alternative to branded formulation.

A Multi-centric Bioequivalence Trial in Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients to Assess Bioequivalence and Safety Evaluation of Generic Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg Tablets.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile and to assess bioequivalence of the sponsor's test formulation (imatinib mesylate 400 mg tablets) with an innovator product (Gleevec 400 mg tablets, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) under fed conditions, in adult patients of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) stabilized on imatinib mesylate 400 mg. In addition, the aim of this study was to monitor the safety profile of investigational medicinal products (IMPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, open label, two-period, crossover, single dose bioequivalence study was designed for conduct under fed conditions in 42 adult Ph+ CML patients already stabilized on imatinib 400 mg tablets. Pharmacokinetic parameters Tmax, Cmax, and AUC0-24 were calculated using a non-compartmental model on validated WinNonlin software. Validated SAS software was used for statistical evaluation of data. The safety profile of investigational products was monitored during the course of study by applying a clinical process for recording observed untoward effects postadministration of investigational products. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference mean ratios of the ln-transformed PK variables Cmax (99.0%) and AUC0-24 (99.2%) were within an acceptable range of 80%-125%, as per bioequivalence assumptions. Both formulations were well tolerated after oral administration of IMPs. CONCLUSION: The test product was found to be bioequivalent and safe, and thus can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Proton pump inhibitors while belonging to the same family of generic drugs show different anti-tumor effect.

CONTEXT: Tumor acidity represents a major cause of chemoresistance. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can neutralize tumor acidity, sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the anti-tumor efficacy of different PPIs in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro experiments PPIs anti-tumor efficacy in terms of cell proliferation and cell death/apoptosis/necrosis evaluation were performed. In vivo PPIs efficacy experiments were carried out using melanoma xenograft model in SCID mice. RESULTS: Lansoprazole showed higher anti-tumor effect when compared to the other PPIs. The lansoprazole effect lasted even upon drug removal from the cell culture medium and it was independent from the lipophilicity of the PPIs formulation. DISCUSSION: These PPIs have shown different anti-tumoral efficacy, and the most effective at low dose was lansoprazole. CONCLUSION: The possibility to contrast tumor acidity by off-label using PPIs opens a new field of oncology investigation.

Characterization of the antithrombotic fingerprint of the branded and copies of the low-molecular-weight enoxaparin using thrombin generation assay.

BACKGROUND: The patent protection of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) expired, so the definition of criteria for the biological similarity between LMWH copies and the original product is a real need. AIM: The present in vitro study compared copies and branded enoxaparin using the specific anti-Xa activity and the calibrated automated thrombogram assay. METHODS: Samples of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from 15 healthy volunteers were spiked with branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) or its copies (Cutenox, Dilutol, Enoxa, Fibrinox, Loparin, Lupenox, Novex, Noxprin, and Versa). The specific anti-Xa activity was measured in PPP, and thrombin generation was assessed in PPP and PRP in the presence of tissue factor or pancreatic cancer cells BXPC3. RESULTS: The anti-Xa activity of enoxaparin copies ranged from 0.072 to 0.088 IU/µg, being lower as compared to the branded enoxaparin (0.095 anti-Xa IU/µg). The potency of each copy to inhibit thrombin generation varied in the 3 experimental systems. The presence of platelets or pancreatic cancer cells BXPC3 in human plasma induced significant modifications in the inhibitory efficiency of enoxaparin copies on thrombin generation, which distinguished them from the branded product. CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin copies showed significant variability regarding their inhibitory potency on thrombin generation. Platelets and cancer cells significantly increased the variability of the antithrombotic efficiency of the copies as compared to the branded enoxaparin. The present study underlines the need for the elaboration of additional functional criteria to evaluate the global antithrombotic capacity of enoxaparin copies in order to evaluate their potential sameness with the branded drug.

Comparative study of the anti-leukemic effects of imatinib mesylate, Glivec™ tablet and its generic formulation, OHK9511.

Long-term treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) allows patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) to live a near-normal lifespan. However, the fact that tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including IM, are extremely expensive is a major cause of poor adherence, resulting in disease relapse or drug resistance. Therefore, physicians are encouraged to prescribe generic drugs to reduce the financial burden of medical expenses. In Japan, only generic drugs that have a basic chemical structure and pharmacokinetic data that are the same as those of the original drug are approved. However, it is not mandatory to demonstrate that generic drugs have adequate biological effects. This is one of the reasons why Japanese hematologists do not often use generic IM. The aim of the present study was to compare the anti-leukemic effects of Glivec™ (a commercial IM) and its generic formulation, OHK9511. The IC50 values of OHK9511 and Glivec™ were comparable, and both induced similar levels of apoptosis in several CML cell lines. Furthermore, the overall survival of OHK9511-treated mice transplanted with BCR-ABL-positive cells was similar to that of mice treated with Glivec™. Although the experiments performed herein were basic, the results suggest that physicians should consider using generic IM.

Relevance of variation in use of terminology to define generic pharmaceutical products / Relevancia de la variación en el uso de la terminología para definir los medicamentos genéricos

The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the use of generic drug policies to foster competition in the pharmaceutical sector, reduce drug prices, and increase access to therapeutic drugs. However, little is known about how countries implement these policies. This article describes different terminology adopted by national regulatory authorities to define generic versus proprietary drug products in developing countries, including those in Latin America, and challenges that arise in their application of WHO guidelines, such as labeling issues. The author concludes that variation in generics terminology in these countries is a result of institutional context (i.e., the public sector setting as well as the body of laws and regulations that exists in the country) and policy legacies, such as intellectual property regimes, and highlights the need for further analysis of pharmaceutical regulations to improve understanding of the barriers and political implications of generic drug policies.

La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) promueve el uso de políticas de medicamentos genéricos para estimular la competencia en el sector farmacéutico, reducir los precios y aumentar el acceso a los medicamentos. Sin embargo, hay poca información sobre la aplicación de dichas políticas por parte de los países. Este artículo describe la terminología empleada por los organismos regulatorios nacionales para definir los medicamentos genéricos frente a las especialidades farmacéuticas de marca en los países en desarrollo, incluidos los de América Latina, así como las dificultades que se encuentran en la aplicación de las directrices de la OMS, como por ejemplo en el etiquetado. El autor llega a la conclusión de que la variación en la terminología de los medicamentos genéricos en estos países es resultado del contexto institucional (es decir, el sector público y el ordenamiento jurídico-administrativo del país) y de los legados de las políticas, como los regímenes de propiedad intelectual, y destaca la necesidad de analizar más a fondo los reglamentos farmacéuticos a fin de conocer mejor los obstáculos y las implicaciones de las políticas en materia de medicamentos genéricos.

Point-of-care measurements of platelet inhibition after clopidogrel loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome: comparison of generic and branded clopidogrel bisulfate.

PURPOSE: Platelet-function suppression with antiplatelet therapy is effective in preventing and treating cardiovascular disease. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine derivative that blocks platelet activation by adenosine diphosphate receptor binding. This study demonstrates the effects of generic clopidogrel bisulfate in comparison to branded clopidogrel bisulfate in patients with acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: This prospective, 2-arm, single-center, open-label trial used 1:1 randomization to assign patients to receive generic or branded clopidogrel bisulfate. Patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and scheduled to undergo coronary angiography were enrolled. Platelet function was measured with a P2Y12 assay and reported in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and aspirin reaction units (ARU) after randomization. Platelet function was measured at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after 600-mg clopidogrel loading. The clinical outcome was checked at 1 month after coronary angiography. FINDINGS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled and randomized to the generic or branded group. Ninety patients (62 men [69%], 28 women [31%]; mean age, 58 years) completed the study protocol. The clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The difference in the baseline PRU measurements between the generic and branded groups was not significant (274.8 [59.7] vs 285.4 [62.4], respectively; P = 0.414). There were significant differences in 2-hour PRU (231.1 [71.3] vs 266.9 [67.4]; P = 0.017) and 4-hour PRU (227.3 [80.4] vs 265.7 [71.0]; P = 0.020); however, 24-hour PRU (200.5 [82.1] vs 220.6 [75.8]; P = 0.253) was similar. No death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-defined major bleeding complications were reported during in-hospital stay or 1-month follow-up. IMPLICATION: In patients with ACS, loading of generic clopidogrel bisulfate was associated with an antiplatelet effect comparable to that of branded clopidogrel bisulfate. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02060786.

Clinical efficacy, safety and anti-inflammatory activity of two sevelamer tablet forms in patients on low-flux hemodialysis.

Sevelamer hydrochloride is an ionic exchange resin with high affinity for phosphate. This phosphate-binding agent has few serious adverse reactions with the advantage of reducing total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. However, it is controversial as to whether sevelamer hydrochloride can modulate the inflammatory response via endotoxin reduction. Therefore, a single-center, open-label, prospective and randomized study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy, safety and anti-inflammatory activity of two sevelamer hydrochloride tablet forms a branded tablet form, Renagel (Genzyme manufacturer) and its generic equivalent (EMS manufacturer). Twenty-eight chronic kidney disease volunteer patients at stage 5 (CDK 5D), on chronic low-flux hemodialysis carried out in 4-hour sessions, three times a week, were studied. The serum phosphorus, ionic calcium, total cholesterol and fractions, bicarbonate, blood pH, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels were collected prior to dialysis at mid-week. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects were determined at the end of the phosphate-binder washout period as well as at the end of the fourth and eighth weeks of use of both tablet forms. The same magnitude of reduction in serum phosphorus was observed with both sevelamer tablet forms. Only the Renagel group showed lower total cholesterol and lower LDL cholesterol levels at the fourth and eighth week versus baseline. No significant differences in serum cytokine levels were identified in either drug group. However, the incidence of intestinal obstipation was higher among patients who used the generic equivalent form. In conclusion, Renagel and its EMS generic equivalent tablet forms have a similar clinical efficacy in reducing phosphorus in CKD 5D patients on low-flux hemodialysis and a similar safety profile.

Clinical pharmacology of tyrosine kinase inhibitors becoming generic drugs: the regulatory perspective.

Over the last decades, billions have been spent and huge efforts have been taken in basic and clinical cancer research [CA Cancer J Clin63:11-30]. About a decade ago, the arms race between drugs and cancer cells reached a new level by introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) into pharmacological anti-cancer therapy. According to their molecular mechanism of action, TKI in contrast to so-called "classic" or "conventional" cytostatics belong to the group of targeted cancer medicines, characterized by accurately fitting with biological structures (i.e. active centers of kinases). Numerous (partly orphan) indications are covered by this new class of substances. Approximately ten years after the first substances of this class of medicines were authorized, patent protection will end within the next years. The following article covers clinical meaning and regulatory status of anti-cancer TKI and gives an outlook to what is expected from the introduction of generic anti-cancer TKI.

Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.

For decades, policies regarding generic medicines have sought to provide patients with economical access to safe and effective drugs, while encouraging the development of new therapies. This balance is becoming more challenging for physicians and regulators as biologics and non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs) such as glatiramer acetate demonstrate remarkable efficacy, because generics for these medicines are more difficult to assess. We sought to develop computational methods that use transcriptional profiles to compare branded medicines to generics, robustly characterizing differences in biological impact. We combined multiple computational methods to determine whether differentially expressed genes result from random variation, or point to consistent differences in biological impact of the generic compared to the branded medicine. We applied these methods to analyze gene expression data from mouse splenocytes exposed to either branded glatiramer acetate or a generic. The computational methods identified extensive evidence that branded glatiramer acetate has a more consistent biological impact across batches than the generic, and has a distinct impact on regulatory T cells and myeloid lineage cells. In summary, we developed a computational pipeline that integrates multiple methods to compare two medicines in an innovative way. This pipeline, and the specific findings distinguishing branded glatiramer acetate from a generic, can help physicians and regulators take appropriate steps to ensure safety and efficacy.

Identification of PPARγ ligands with One-dimensional Drug Profile Matching.

INTRODUCTION: Computational molecular database screening helps to decrease the time and resources needed for drug development. Reintroduction of generic drugs by second medical use patents also contributes to cheaper and faster drug development processes. We screened, in silico, the Food and Drug Administration-approved generic drug database by means of the One-dimensional Drug Profile Matching (oDPM) method in order to find potential peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists. The PPARγ action of the selected generics was also investigated by in vitro and in vivo experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The in silico oDPM method was used to determine the binding potency of 1,255 generics to 149 proteins collected. In vitro PPARγ activation was determined by measuring fatty acid-binding protein 4/adipocyte protein gene expression in a Mono Mac 6 cell line. The in vivo insulin sensitizing effect of the selected compound (nitazoxanide; 50-200 mg/kg/day over 8 days; n = 8) was established in type 2 diabetic rats by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamping. RESULTS: After examining the closest neighbors of each of the reference set's members and counting their most abundant neighbors, ten generic drugs were selected with oDPM. Among them, four enhanced fatty acid-binding protein/adipocyte protein gene expression in the Mono Mac 6 cell line, but only bromfenac and nitazoxanide showed dose-dependent actions. Induction by nitazoxanide was higher than by bromfenac. Nitazoxanide lowered fasting blood glucose levels and improved insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic rats. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the oDPM method can predict previously unknown therapeutic effects of generic drugs. Nitazoxanide can be the prototype chemical structure of the new generation of insulin sensitizers.

Gene expression analysis reveals functional pathways of glatiramer acetate activation.

BACKGROUND: Glatiramer acetate (GA, Copaxone®), a mixture of polymers comprising four amino acids, is approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome. GA mediates its activity by induction of GA-specific T cells that shift the T cell balance from a dominant proinflammatory phenotype (Th1/Th17) to an anti-inflammatory phenotype (Th2/Treg). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the functional pathways by which GA acts on immune cells, the authors conducted gene expression profiling using glatiramoid-stimulated splenocytes. METHODS: Mice were immunized with GA and harvested splenocytes were reactivated ex vivo with GA or a purported generic GA. Gene expression profiles and functional pathways were evaluated in reactivated splenocytes. RESULTS: Overall, 1,474 genes were significantly upregulated or downregulated by GA. The main functional pathways induced by GA were: increased proliferation and activation of immune cells including T and B lymphocytes, stimulation of antigen presenting cells and differentiation of effector T lymphocytes. T-helper cell differentiation was the most significant canonical pathway associated with gene transcripts altered by GA. These expression patterns were not observed when splenocytes were activated with generic GA. CONCLUSION: GA-induced functional pathways coincide with known mechanisms of GA activity in MS patients and further support the unique therapeutic effect of this drug.

A randomized comparison of platelet reactivity in patients after treatment with various commercial clopidogrel preparations: the CLO-CLO trial.

BACKGROUND: The salt linked to the clopidogrel molecule in generic preparations is suspected to affect its clinical efficacy. There is a lack of information about inhibition of platelet reactivity by generic preparations. AIMS: To compare the effect of original clopidogrel (clopidogrel bisulphate [Plavix(®)]), generic clopidogrel preparations (clopidogrel hydrochloride [Clopidogrel-Mepha(®)]; clopidogrel besylate [Clopidogrel Sandoz(®)]) and prasugrel (Efient(®)) on platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease treated with stents received, in a random sequence, original clopidogrel bisulphate, clopidogrel hydrochloride and clopidogrel besylate. Platelet function was assessed with the Multiplate analyser after an initial loading dose (600 mg) and at day 10 after each treatment period. Prasugrel was given for another 10 days. An adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test value<46 antiaggregation units (U) was defined as therapeutic platelet inhibition. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 69 ± 10 years; 50 men) were randomized. Original clopidogrel bisulphate, clopidogrel hydrochloride and clopidogrel besylate provided similar inhibition of platelet reactivity with values of 31 ± 25, 33 ± 28 and 28 ± 23 U, respectively (P not significant). Prasugrel provided better inhibition of platelet function (10 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 25 U for clopidogrel bisulphate; P<0.001). An ADP test value>46 U was measured in 11 patients (18%) with clopidogrel bisulphate, 13 (22%) with clopidogrel besylate and 13 (22%) with clopidogrel hydrochloride compared with only one (2%) with prasugrel. CONCLUSION: Generic clopidogrel preparations provided similar inhibition of platelet reactivity to original clopidogrel bisulphate, although prasugrel was more efficient.