Effectiveness and safety of GnRH antagonist originator and generic in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aims to determine whether the live birth rates were similar between GnRH antagonist original reference product Cetrotide® and generic Ferpront®, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigates COS cycles utilizing GnRH antagonist protocols. The research was conducted at a specialized reproductive medicine center within a tertiary care hospital, spanning the period from October 2019 to October 2021. Within this timeframe, a total of 924 cycles were administered utilizing the GnRH antagonist originator, Cetrotide® (Group A), whereas 1984 cycles were undertaken using the generic, Ferpront® (Group B). Results: Ovarian reserve markers, including anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle number, and basal follicular stimulating hormone, were lower in Group A compared to Group B. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance these markers between the groups. After PSM, baseline clinical features were similar, except for a slightly longer infertile duration in Group A versus Group B (4.43 ± 2.92 years vs. 4.14 ± 2.84 years, P = 0.029). The duration of GnRH antagonist usage was slightly longer in Group B than in Group A (6.02 ± 1.41 vs. 5.71 ± 1.48 days, P < 0.001). Group B had a slightly lower number of retrieved oocytes compared to Group A (14.17 ± 7.30 vs. 14.96 ± 7.75, P = 0.024). However, comparable numbers of usable embryos on day 3 and good-quality embryos were found between the groups. Reproductive outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate, did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses suggested that the type of GnRH antagonist did not independently impact the number of oocytes retrieved, usable embryos, good-quality embryos, moderate to severe OHSS rate, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rate. Conclusion: The retrospective analysis revealed no clinically significant differences in reproductive outcomes between Cetrotide® and Ferpront® when used in women undergoing their first and second COS cycles utilizing the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Use of DOACs in frail elderly patients in light of class genericization.

BACKGROUND: Frailty and comorbidity influence the therapeutic approach in everyday clinical practice. The DOACs genericization opens a reflection on their differences from a pharmacological and bioavailability point of view, particularly in elderly frail patients. The aim of this project was to create a national Delphi consensus on the topic of the use of DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) in such patients, in light of the genericization of the class. METHODS AND RESULTS: The consensus dealt with 3 main topics: a) efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly and/or frail patients; b) therapeutic choice in specific frailty scenarios; c) DOACs genericization. 56 cardiologists, two internists and two neurologists from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: uncertain, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). A positive consensus was reached if the percentage of agreement (vote 1-2, positive consensus) or disagreement (votes 4-5, negative consensus) was >66%; otherwise, no consensus was reached. Results are displayed accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: After 10 years of everyday clinical management of DOACs for AF, specific elements differentiating a molecule from another, either for efficacy or for safety, are consolidated. However, some uncertainties still exist in particular contexts, such as chronic kidney disease or cancer patients. Clinicians have an unsure attitude towards generic drugs, because clinical practice is lacking as well as a proper knowledge of the topic. Albeit being an alternative, the choice of the generic drug must remain the responsibility of the clinician.

Navigating the Management of Chronic Phase CML in the Era of Generic BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Over the past several years, advances in research, treatment, and market dynamics have impacted treatment strategies in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). They include the broader availability of cost-effective generic imatinib, and soon other generic second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Access to affordable generics means that all patients with CML-CP should have access to safe and highly effective lifelong therapies. When overall survival is the treatment endpoint, imatinib provides a good treatment value. Second-generation TKIs may be the best frontline strategy when treatment-free remission is the goal. Recent studies have shown maintained efficacy and reduced toxicity when TKIs are used at reduced dosing. Reduced-dose schedules of second-generation TKIs (which are less toxic and induce faster deep molecular responses) may render generic second-generation TKIs a more attractive treatment option. Adjusting the dose of TKI in the presence of mild-to-moderate, or even severe but reversible, adverse events may be preferable to switching to a different TKI. The selection of second-line and beyond therapies depends on the evolving patterns observed with frontline treatment. Dose-adjusted ponatinib schedules have demonstrated improved efficacy and safety in patients resistant to second-generation TKIs or those with T315I-mutated disease. For asciminib, longer-term follow-up is needed to better evaluate its safety and efficacy compared with ponatinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents a valid alternative to newer-generation TKIs, with a better treatment value when TKIs are priced at >$40,000/year.

Effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Saudi patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir (SOF) and branded daclatasvir (DCV) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)infected patients. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in a single center in Saudi Arabia between August 2017 and July 2022, we enrolled 140 consecutive patients with HCV who received generic SOF and branded DCV. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: The majority of the patients were female (62.1%), infected with genotype 4 (57.9%), and treatment-naïve in 120 (85.7%) patients with baseline cirrhosis in 55 (39.3%). The mean patient age was 61±13.6 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 131 (93.6%) patients achieved SVR12. Moreover, 85.7%, 100%, 100%, 88.9%, and 96.3% of genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the per-protocol analysis, 131 (96.3%) patients achieved an SVR of 12. Additionally, 92.3%, 100%, 100%, 88.9%, and 98.7% of the patients with genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, achieved SVR12. No HCV virologic breakthroughs occurred. In the subgroup analysis, SVR12 rates were comparable regardless of baseline characteristics, such as treatment history, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients achieving SVR12 showed a significant improvement in post-treatment serum liver enzyme and total bilirubin levels. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study confirm the effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir as a treatment option for HCV infection.

Exploring the Potential Challenges for Developing Generic Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases: A Survey of US and European Markets.

OBJECTIVES: The US Food and Drug Administration in 1983 and the European Union's European Medicines Agency in 2000 implemented the orphan drug development program for rare diseases. The study aimed to find the potential challenges encountered by generic companies in developing generics for rare diseases. METHODS: We performed a thematic analysis, which consists of qualitative and quantitative research. For data analysis of approved orphan drugs, we used statistical methods, and for the industrial case study, we selected 14 generic companies and conducted semistructured interviews related to 10 critical areas of drug development. RESULTS: The orphan drug approvals were classified into 4 categories: the number of orphan approvals, pediatric claims, formulation, and therapeutic areas. We analyzed the approvals from 2001 to 2021; the Food and Drug Administration approved 815 drugs and European Medicines Agency approved 258 drugs. The pediatric orphan approvals were analyzed from 2010 to 2021; the average percentage of orphan drugs claim pediatric exclusivity during this period was found to be 31.8%. In formulation, we found the highest percentage of drugs belong to small molecules at 71%. In the therapeutic class, oncology drugs have a majority of approvals at 25%. The industrial case study responses revealed that the major challenge for drug development is the complexity of the disease at 21%, followed by the limited market at 17%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high need for generic orphan drugs in the developing countries. The generic companies can use the opportunities provided by health authorities for the benefit of both the company and the patient perspective.

A prospective, open-label, randomised, parallel design study of 4 generic formulations of intramuscular L-asparaginase in childhood precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL).

AIMS: L-asparaginase is an essential medicine for childhood ALL. The quality of generic L-asparaginase available in India is a matter of concern. We compared four commonly used generic formulations of L-asparaginase in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomised trial of four generic formulations of asparaginase for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk B-ALL. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive generic asparaginase at a dose of at 10,000 IU/m 2 on days 9, 12, 15, and 18 of a 35-day cycle (Induction treatment). The primary end points were to determine the difference in the asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion. Historical patients who received L-asparaginase Medac (innovator) served as controls. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent randomization; 12 patients each in the four arms. Failure to achieve predefined activity threshold of 100 IU/L was observed in 9/40 samples of Generic A (22·5%), 23/40 of Generic B (57·5%), and 43/44 (98%) each of Generic C and D. All 27 samples from seven historical patients who were administered Medac had activity > 100 IU/L. The average activity was significantly higher for Genericm A, 154 (70·3, 285·4) IU/L followed by Generic B 84·5(44·2, 289·1) IU/L, Generic C 45(14·4, 58·4) IU/L, and Generic D 20·4(13, 35) IU/L. Only 6 patients had asparaginase activity > 100 IU/L on each of the four occasions (Generic A = 5; Generic B = 1), and none of them developed Anti-Asparaginase Antibodies (AAA). On the other hand, AAA was observed in 12/36 patients who had at least one level < 100 IU/L (P < 0·05): Generic A 3/5, Generic B = 3/9, Generic D (4/11), and Generic C (5/11). CONCLUSION: Generic A and B had better trough asparaginase activity compared to Generic D and C. Overall, generic formulations had lower asparaginase activity which raises serious clinical concerns regarding their quality. Until strict regulatory enforcement improves the quality of these generics, dose adaptive approaches coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring need to be considered.

Trends in anti-HER2 drugs consumption and influencing factors.

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors have been approved to treat various cancers with HER2 amplification. The Chinese government has made great efforts to improve the availability and affordability of these drugs. This study aimed to analyze the trends in anti-HER2 drug consumptions in Nanjing from 2012 to 2021, and explore influencing factors. Methods: Data about use of anti-HER2 drugs in 2012-2021 were extracted from Jiangsu Medicine Information Institute. Six types of anti-HER2 drugs were included. Drug consumption was expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs) and expenditure. Time series analysis was adopted to find trends in consumption, while interrupted time series was used in analyzing the impact of policy on consumption. The correlation between DDDs and defined daily cost (DDC) was analyzed by Pearson's correlation test. Results: The DDC, DDDs, and expenditure of anti-HER2 drugs changed little from 2012 to 2016. The DDC decreased intermittently, while the DDDs and expenditure of these drugs grew continuously from 2017 to 2021. The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies contributed to the majority of total consumption in 2012-2019. The DDDs of anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors surpassed the DDDs of monoclonal antibodies in 2020-2021. Trastuzumab was the predominantly prescribed drug in 2012-2019, but the DDDs of pyrotinib surpassed the DDDs of trastuzumab in 2020-2021. The ln value of DDC or self-paid DDC of trastuzumab was negatively correlated with the ln value of its DDDs. The national health insurance coverage (NHIC) and national drug price negotiation policy about anti-HER2 drugs were initiated in 2017. Low-price generics and biosimilar of trastuzumab came into the market in 2020 and 2021, separately. Interrupted time series analysis showed that the DDDs increased significantly after the implementation of NHIC, price negotiation or generic drug replacement. Conclusion: The consumption of anti-HER2 drugs has significantly increased and their DDC has decreased after the implementation of NHIC, price negotiation, or low-price generic drug replacement since 2017. Further efforts are needed to translate the high consumption into clinical benefits.

The influence of drug prices, new availability of inexpensive generic imatinib, new approvals, and post-marketing research on the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the USA.

Several research and market developments in the past 5 years could influence front-line and subsequent-line strategies in chronic myeloid leukaemia. These developments include the increased availability of effective and safe generic imatinib at affordable prices, studies showing that doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) lower than the approved dose are effective and less toxic, studies showing that dose-adjusted ponatinib therapy at a reduced dose is effective and substantially safer than approved doses, and the approval of asciminib as third-line therapy in 2021. With the availability of an affordable generic imatinib, all patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia globally should be able to access a lifetime supply. The availability of reduced-dose schedules of generic second-generation TKIs, which are less toxic and produce faster deep molecular response than imatinib, might make them more appealing to use as front-line therapy. In the subsequent-line setting, the role of different TKIs as second, third, and later lines of therapy depends on the evolving front-line use. Dose-adjusted ponatinib schedules have shown better efficacy and safety with long-term follow-up. Ponatinib is the favoured therapy for patients with second-generation-TKI resistance or chronic myeloid leukaemia with 944C→T (Thr315Ile)-mutated BCR-ABL1. Studies of asciminib are needed in larger numbers of patients and with longer follow-up than has been done previously to better assess its comparative efficacy, safety, and survival data (vs ponatinib). The role of third-generation TKIs as second-line therapy following front-line resistance to second-generation TKIs needs to be evaluated. New and mature data with TKI therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia are producing observations that encourage continuous discussion of the optimal treatment recommendations and frameworks in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Finding the Lowest-Cost Pharmacy for Cancer Supportive Care Medications: Not So Easy.

PURPOSE: To decrease the financial burden on people with cancer, clinicians and patients increasingly use medication price comparison websites to seek pharmacies where medications may be cheaper. Shopping around at different pharmacies can add additional time and logistic burden to patients and care partners. We sought to determine whether a single pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price for symptom control medications. METHODS: We compiled medications/formulations used to manage two common cancer-associated symptoms: nausea/vomiting and anorexia/cachexia. We extracted discounted, lowest price with coupon prices for a typical fill of these medications at nine pharmacies in Minneapolis, MN, using GoodRx. We compared prices across formulations and pharmacies to assess whether a pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price. RESULTS: We included 24 formulations for nausea/vomiting (14 generic and 10 brand-name) and 19 for anorexia/cachexia (12 generic and seven brand-name). Prices for brand-name formulations were similar across pharmacies, but prices of generic formulations varied widely across pharmacies. For example, the prices of a seven-unit fill of generic 5-mg olanzapine tablets ranged from $4 to $57 US dollars. No single pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price across the formulations studied. For example, for the 12 generic formulations for anorexia/cachexia, one pharmacy had the highest price for four formulations and the lowest price for two others. CONCLUSION: In this study of discounted medication prices, we found that no single pharmacy in an urban zip code consistently offered the lowest price for medications used to manage two common cancer-associated symptoms. Well-intentioned efforts to pursue the cheapest source of each medication by visiting multiple pharmacies may add extra time and logistic toxicity to patients and care partners. This approach can increase redundant scripts and expose patients to medication-related adverse events.

Clinical Observation and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations of Original Research Drug and Generic Drug Bortezomib in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the hitherto incurable malignant blood tumors. Bortezomib plays an important role in the treatment of MM. Objective: We aimed to compare effectiveness, safety, and pharmacoeconomic evaluations of the original research drug and the generic drug Bortezomib in the treatment of MM, so as to provide a reasonable basis for the selection of drugs in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A collection of 374 patients with MM were diagnosed and treated with combined Bortezomib in our hospital from July 2019 to January 2020.Two hundred and sixty nine cases met the criteria for inclusion and discharge. According to the different drug manufacturers, divided into the original research drug group (n = 149) and the generic drug group (n = 120). The effectiveness and safety were separately counted, and use the cost-minimization analysis to make the pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Results: Compared with the results of the two groups, there was no statistical difference between the two groups of treatment efficacy or adverse reaction rates (P > 0.05). The average daily cost of the original research drug group was 2954.38 Chinese yuan (CNY), the average treatment cost per cycle was 32967.69 CNY, the average daily cost of the generic drug group was 2697.29 CNY, and the average treatment cost per cycle was 29129.57 CNY. The price of the generic drug group is lower than the original drug group, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There was no difference between the two groups of effectiveness or safety, and the generic drug is more economical in the treatment.

Rates of, and factors associated with, switching among generic levothyroxine preparations in commercially insured American adults.

IMPORTANCE: Some practice guidelines warn against generic L-thyroxine preparation switching. OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of generic L-thyroxine preparation switching within one year of initiating L-thyroxine, and to examine factors associated with switching. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study using national data from a large administrative claims database from January 2008 through November 2018. PATIENTS: Medicare or commercially insured adults (≥18 years) who filled a generic L-thyroxine preparation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At least one switch from one generic L-thyroxine preparation to another within 1 year of L-thyroxine initiation defined by prescription fills. RESULTS: From January 2008 to November 2018, we included 483,390 patients who initiated generic L-thyroxine: mean (SD) age was 61.4 years (15.2), 75.2% were female, 72.6% were white. Within 1 year of initiating therapy, 98,013 (20%) switched to another L-thyroxine generic preparation at least once. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with switching included the number of pharmacies visited to fill L-thyroxine (>2 vs 1 adjusted OR [aOR] 7.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.97-7.34), age ≥75 vs. <45 years (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.26-1.33), history of thyroid surgery (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13-1.31), and first L-thyroxine fill date in 2018 vs. 2008 (aOR 3.32, 95% CI 3.14-3.51). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: One in five patients switched among generic L-thyroxine manufacturers within one year of treatment initiation. Generic L-thyroxine switching occurred more often when more pharmacies were used to fill L-thyroxine. Given existing guideline recommendations, additional studies should clarify the impact of generic L-thyroxine switching on thyroid hormone values.

Indication-Specific Generic Uptake of Imatinib Demonstrates the Impact of Skinny Labeling.

PURPOSE: Generic competition can be delayed if brand-name manufacturers obtain additional patents on supplemental uses. The US Food and Drug Administration allows generic drug manufacturers to market versions with skinny labels that exclude patent-protected indications. This study assessed whether use of generic versions of imatinib varied between indications included and excluded from the skinny labels. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we identified adult patients covered by commercial insurance or Medicare Advantage plans who initiated imatinib from February 2016 (first generic availability) to September 2020. Generic versions were introduced with skinny labels that included indications covering treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) but excluded treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) because of remaining patent protections. Logistic regression was used to determine whether use of generic versus brand-name imatinib differed between patients with a diagnosis of CML or GIST, adjusting for demographics, insurance type, prior use of brand-name drugs, and calendar month. RESULTS: Among 2,000 initiators, 934 (47%) had CML and 686 (34%) had GIST. Within 3 years after generics entered the market, more than 90% of initiators in both groups used generic imatinib. Initiation of generic imatinib was slightly lower among patients with GIST than among patients with CML (85% v 88%; adjusted odds ratio 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.80; P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Generic versions of imatinib were dispensed frequently for indications both included (CML) and excluded (GIST) from the skinny labeling, although patients with GIST were slightly less likely to receive a generic version. The skinny labeling pathway allowed generics to enter the market before patent protection for treating patients with GIST expired, facilitating lower drug prices.

Generic Clopidogrel: Has Substitution for Brand Name Plavix® Been Effective?

BACKGROUND: Following the expiration of brand name exclusivity of Plavix® in 2012, generic clopidogrel bisulfate was approved. As a widely prescribed medication with significant inter-patient pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, data regarding the impact of switching to generic clopidogrel bisulfate on patients is needed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether generic clopidogrel bisulfate is as efficacious as Plavix® for the inhibition of platelet aggregation. METHODS: Patients treated with Plavix® monotherapy (n = 254) or generic clopidogrel bisulfate monotherapy (n = 185) were included in this retrospective review. Confounding factors previously found to affect clopidogrel responsiveness (diabetes, female sex, and smoking) were assessed, as well as medications classified as substrates, inducers, and inhibitors of enzymes involved in clopidogrel metabolism. Whole blood impedance aggregometry was used to measure platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate. Patients were tested after ≥2 weeks of treatment and designated as non-responders if aggregation response exceeded sensitivity thresholds of 6 ohms of impedance. RESULTS: The introduction of generic clopidogrel bisulfate was associated with a decrease in antiplatelet resistance (44% to 31%, p < 0.01) and decreased mean ohms of resistance (5.06 ± 4.55 to 3.32 ± 4.03, p < 0.01). Prior to analysis of secondary outcomes, 217 patients were eliminated due to antiplatelet usage for longer than 3 years (n = 123 for Plavix® and n = 118 for clopidogrel). There was no statistically significant finding in prevalence of secondary events. CONCLUSION: Resistance rates to the antiplatelet, clopidogrel are significantly lower since the switch to generic formulations. Further investigation into the impact of variability between clopidogrel bisulfate formulations is needed.

Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of generic imatinib in CML and the impact of generics on health care costs.

Since the introduction of imatinib, the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed considerably. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the mainstay of CML treatment; however, the high financial burden of TKIs can be problematic for both the patients and health care systems. After the emergence of generics, reimbursement policies of many countries have changed, and generics offered an alternative treatment option for CML patients. There are many papers published on the use of generics in CML patients with conflicting results regarding both efficacy and safety. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the current literature on generic imatinib use in CML, and 36 papers were evaluated. Both in vitro and in vivo studies of generic imatinib showed comparable results with branded imatinib in terms of bioequivalence and bioavailability. In most studies, generics were comparable with the original molecule in terms of efficacy and safety, both in newly diagnosed patients and after switching from Gleevec. Some generic studies showed contradictory findings regarding efficacy and toxicity, and these differences can be attributed to some factors including the use of different generics in different countries. Both in hypothetical models and in real life, introduction of generic imatinib caused significant reduction in health care costs. In conclusion, generics are not inferior to original imatinib in terms of efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. Notwithstanding the generally favorable efficacy and safety of generics worldwide to date, we most probably still need more time to draw firmer conclusions on the longer-term outcomes of generics.

Unsatisfactory quality of E. coli asparaginase biogenerics in India: Implications for clinical outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: The biotherapeutic asparaginase is a cornerstone of therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). With limited access to the original native Escherichia coli-derived asparaginase (EcASNase), a variety of EcASNase biogenerics are used in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). The variable quality of these biogenerics potentially influences clinical outcomes. PROCEDURE: Seven biogeneric EcASNases (P1-P7) marketed widely in India were evaluated, with P2 as an exemplar for in vivo monitoring. Therapeutic activity of P2 (10,000 IU/m2 /dose, intramuscular, every 72 hours) was monitored during induction therapy, and drug-related toxicities recorded. Molecular identity, purity and in vitro drug activity of seven biogenerics were characterised using multimodal analyses, and findings compared with reference EcASNase (R). RESULTS: In patients (N = 62) receiving P2, subtherapeutic asparaginase activity (<100 U/L) was observed in 66% (46/70) of trough timepoints (72 hours postdose) during induction. Twelve patients (19%), 11 with high-risk ALL, developed hypersensitivity. Isoforms of EcASNase were identified in all seven biogenerics. All generic products contained impurities with batch-to-batch variability. These included high levels of protein aggregates and host cell protein contamination. In vitro assays of EcASNase activity and leukaemia cell line cytotoxicity were not discriminatory. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm widespread concerns over the unsatisfactory quality and therapeutic activity of native EcASNase biogenerics marketed in LMICs. Appropriate use of these products requires monitored studies to identify clinical suitability and determine appropriate dosing and schedule. For large parts of the world, assured access to high-quality asparaginases remains an unmet therapeutic need.

National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2021.

PURPOSE: To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2021 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. METHODS: Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2021 were reviewed-including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, generics, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic influence, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2021 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. RESULTS: In 2020, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the United States grew 4.9% compared to 2019, for a total of $535.3 billion. Utilization (a 2.9% increase) and new drugs (a 1.8% increase) drove this increase, with price changes having minimal influence (a 0.3% increase). Adalimumab was the top drug in 2020, followed by apixaban and insulin glargine. Drug expenditures were $35.3 billion (a 4.6% decrease) and $98.4 billion (an 8.1% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, growth was driven by new products and increased utilization, whereas in hospitals the decrease in expenditures was driven by reduced utilization. Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2021. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures along with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: For 2021, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 4% to 6%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 7% to 9% and 3% to 5%, respectively, compared to 2020. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending.