Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 186
Filtrar
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(8): 548-552, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34464556

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medical malpractice litigation is a major concern for all spine surgeons. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and burden of successful litigation relating to the management of spinal disorders over 12 years within a UK NHS tertiary-level spinal unit and compare these litigation costs with those of other specialties. METHODS: We obtained all data held by our claims department from its inception in January 2008 to December 2019. We also obtained costs for the total financial burden incurred by our Trust during this period. RESULTS: In total, there were 83 closed claims involving spinal pathologies. Over 80% of these comprised negligent surgery (n = 28, 34%), delay to diagnose/treat (n = 25, 30%) and negligent care (n = 18, 22%). The vast majority of claims were withdrawn without incurring any cost to the hospital (n = 59, 71%) and only 24 (29%) resulted in successful litigation for the claimant. The total cost of damages for these 24 successful claims was just over £8 million, including legal costs of £2.5 million, out of total litigation costs of £381 million over this period. DISCUSSION: Fewer than 30% of initial claims against a tertiary spinal surgical referral unit resulted in a successful financial outcome for the claimant. The total costs incurred were just over £8 million, with one-third apportioned to high legal costs, reflecting the complexity of resolving spinal litigation. Our entire legal expenses accounted for only 2% of the total legal bill paid by our hospital over a 12-year period.


Assuntos
Imperícia/economia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Humanos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/economia , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido
4.
BJU Int ; 128(3): 361-365, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773003

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To look into the urology litigation trends and successful claims in the National Health Service (NHS) over the last 20 years. METHODS: We requested data from NHS Resolutions to investigate current litigation numbers, costs and causes for claims. Data collected included the number of claims dating from 1996 to 2019, the total sum of damages paid out each year for urology and the causes for the claims dating from 2009 to 2019. Data from NHS Resolutions were analysed, stratified and categorized by the authors from this information, which was provided as two separate documents. RESULTS: The total cost of damages between 1997 and 2017 was £74.5m (range: £241 325-£7.8m per year). While the number of successful claims was 1653 (range 7-168 per year), the total number of claims was 3341 (range 31-347 per year) and, over time, this has increased almost sevenfold. The cost of damages has increased roughly in line with the number of claims. Over the last 10 years, non-operative-related claims accounted for 984 claims, of which the largest subset was for 'the failure to diagnose and/or treat' (n = 639, 65%), with 88 (9%) successful consent-related claims. There were 226 intra-operative-related claims. Of these, wrong-site surgery, a never-event, accounted for eight claims and there were six successful claims for failing to supervise juniors. A total of 1129 claims were postoperative claims, with retained foreign body or instrument accounting for 71 (6%) of these. CONCLUSIONS: The number and cost of litigation claims have increased year on year. There is a need for continual improvement in patient care, surgical training, counselling, informed consent and early management of complications. The evidence reviewed in this paper suggests that the best approach to this is the combination of rigid adherence to and re-enforcement of common surgical guidelines and implementation of the national 'Getting it right first time' initiative.


Assuntos
Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Urologia/economia , Urologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 549-554, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946996

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Claims for clinical negligence awarded to patients and their families are on the increase. The annual "cost of harm" is approximately £7-9 billion in the United Kingdom. In 2017, the National Health Service (NHS) resolution service reported that they mediated more claims than in their entire history. Vascular surgery is a specialty with a disproportionately higher number of claims for clinical negligence. The aim of this observational study was to review the trends of clinical negligence claims in vascular surgery within the United Kingdom. The costs and the primary cause for the complaint were evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed. Clinical negligence claims in vascular surgery between the financial years of April 2005/2006 to April 2018/2019 were requested from NHS resolution under the Freedom of Information Act. Data were provided on November 8, 2019. All data were anonymized, and any categories containing fewer than five claims were removed to protect the identity of claimants. RESULTS: Over the 13-year period, 1,189 claims in vascular surgery were identified, with the annual mean (range) being 91 (20-134) claims per year. Of 1,189 claims, 875 (74%) are closed with payments made to the claimants. The mean annual total payment was £10,015,373. Delay in treatment was the most common cause for litigation claims in vascular surgery with 157 closed claims costing £33,255,248 over the 13-year period. Lower limb amputation was the most common primary injury claim with 140 closed cases but had a larger financial cost at £64,155,969. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical negligence claims in vascular surgery within the United Kingdom have been increasing steadily over the last 13 years and with a changing claims culture is expected to continue. The most common cause for claims with damages paid was delay in treatment, and lower limb amputation was the most common injury suffered. Improved consent, better communication with patients, and a higher surgical skill level could significantly reduce the number of future claims.


Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Imperícia/economia , Medicina Estatal/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Amputação Cirúrgica/economia , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Diagnóstico Tardio/economia , Humanos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/economia , Reino Unido , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências
7.
Bull Hist Med ; 94(1): 91-124, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362595

RESUMO

This article examines the Rockefeller Foundation's (RF) engagement with the British National Health Service (NHS) between 1945 and 1960. It argues that the organization morally invested in the success of the NHS because, to them, it offered a world-inspiring model for how to provide medical care following the tenets of social medicine. The RF administratively and financially supported two health centers, in Edinburgh and Manchester, to help realize these ambitions. While the development of both centers exposed conflicting understandings of social medicine, these facilities later became important examples when British health centers expanded in number after the mid-1960s. The article also considers how the shift toward more communal forms of general practice provoked unease regarding privacy among patients. However, strategies used by medical professionals to offset these anxieties helped facilitate public acceptance of forms of care that aligned with the communitarian values of social democracy. The connections between American private philanthropy and British state planning show how a routine visit to the doctor in Edinburgh or Manchester in the 1950s was implicated in the broader politics of postwar global health.


Assuntos
Fundações/história , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/história , Medicina Estatal/história , História do Século XX , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido
8.
Bone Joint J ; 102-B(5): 550-555, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349593

RESUMO

The cost of clinical negligence in the UK has continued to rise despite no increase in claims numbers from 2016 to 2019. In the US, medical malpractice claim rates have fallen each year since 2001 and the payout rate has stabilized. In Germany, malpractice claim rates for spinal surgery fell yearly from 2012 to 2017, despite the number of spinal operations increasing. In Australia, public healthcare claim rates were largely static from 2008 to 2013, but private claims rose marginally. The cost of claims rose during the period. UK and Australian trends are therefore out of alignment with other international comparisons. Many of the claims in orthopaedics occur as a result of "failure to warn", i.e. lack of adequately documented and appropriate consent. The UK and USA have similar rates (26% and 24% respectively), but in Germany the rate is 14% and in Australia only 2%. This paper considers the drivers for the increased cost of clinical negligence claims in the UK compared to the USA, Germany and Australia, from a spinal and orthopaedic point of view, with a focus on "failure to warn" and lack of compliance with the principles established in February 2015 in the Supreme Court in the case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. The article provides a description of the prevailing medicolegal situation in the UK and also calculates, from publicly available data, the cost to the public purse of the failure to comply with the principles established. It shows that compliance with the Montgomery principles would have an immediate and lasting positive impact on the sums paid by NHS Resolution to settle negligence cases in a way that has already been established in the USA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):550-555.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Austrália , Alemanha , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Medicina Estatal/ética , Decisões da Suprema Corte , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
9.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 102(2): 144-148, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755728

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Statutory duty of candour was introduced in November 2014 for NHS bodies in England. Contained within the regulation were definitions regarding the threshold for what constitutes a notifiable patient safety incident. However, it can be difficult to determine when the process should be implemented. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the interpretation of these definitions by British neurosurgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All full (consultant) members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons were electronically invited to participate in an online survey. Surgeons were presented with 15 cases and asked to decide in the case of each one whether they would trigger the process of duty of candour. Cases were stratified according to their likelihood and severity. RESULTS: In all, 106/357 (29.7%) members participated in the survey. Responses varied widely, with almost no members triggering the process of duty of candour in cases where adverse events were common (greater than 10% likelihood) and required only outpatient follow-up (7/106; 6.6%), and almost all members doing so in cases where adverse events were rare (less than 0.1% likelihood) and resulted in death (102/106; 96.2%). However, there was clear equipoise in triggering the process of duty of candour in cases where adverse events were uncommon (0.1-10% likelihood) and resulted in moderate harm (38/106; 35.8%), severe harm (57/106; 53.8%) or death (49/106; 46.2%). CONCLUSION: There is considerable nationwide variation in the interpretation of definitions regarding the threshold for duty of candour. To this end, we propose a framework for the improved application of duty of candour in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , Inglaterra , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Neurocirurgiões/legislação & jurisprudência , Neurocirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurocirurgia/legislação & jurisprudência , Neurocirurgia/organização & administração , Relações Médico-Paciente , Sociedades Médicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Med Leg J ; 87(4): 192-195, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31644385

RESUMO

Through a series of Freedom of Information requests to NHS Resolution on claims made from 2005/2006 to 2017/2018 we have analysed trends of UK litigation in ophthalmology, identifying the most common causes and primary injuries for closed (settled) claims resulting in payment of damages during this 13-year period. We assess the most common causes of litigation in ophthalmology with respect to previous rulings in clinical negligence and provide a case example for discussion.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Oftalmologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Oftalmologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração
11.
Postgrad Med ; 131(8): 607-611, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452426

RESUMO

Objectives: Thyroid disease is managed by primary and a range of secondary care specialties. Interventions for common thyroid conditions are effective, but delays in diagnosis, ineffective or inappropriate treatment may affect outcomes and be subject to litigation. This study aimed to analyze trends in thyroid malpractice litigation in the UK over a 14-year period.Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed negligence claims recorded by the NHS Litigation Authority from 2002 to 2016. Data on incident details, outcomes, time to settlement, costs, and specialties involved were collected and analyzed.Results: Out of 189 cases reviewed, an outcome was decided in 134 cases; of which, 67.9% were successful for the claimant, resulting in compensation being paid. The most common reasons for successful claims were treatment complications (47 cases) and delay or failure of diagnosis (22 cases). Nerve and/or vocal cord damage and hypoparathyroidism were cited in 12 and 3 cases, respectively. Common specialties involved in successful claims were general surgery, ENT and endocrinology. The median (range) costs paid for compensation were £50,701.35 (£189.00 to £4.5 million). The median (interquartile range) time from incident to settlement was 1254 (992-1756) days. The number of claims (overall and successful) has reduced over the 14-year period, but there has been no change in the total cost per successful claim from 2002 to 2014 (p = 0.151).Conclusion: This overview demonstrates common causes and identifies trends in thyroid malpractice litigation in the UK, highlighting the significant costs incurred. The outcomes of the study will provide a basis to enable clinicians to avoid potential pitfalls and formulate guidelines to minimize risk.


Assuntos
Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
12.
J Card Surg ; 34(9): 754-758, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332830

RESUMO

Approximately 36 400 cardiac and 23 100 thoracic operations are carried out in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2015. National Health Service (NHS) resolution, as known as the NHS litigation authority, is one of the essential bodies of the Department of Health. Its purpose is to provide NHS expertise to resolve concerns fair and square share learning for improvement. We aim to evaluate and increase awareness of medicolegal cases in cardiothoracic surgery. Total numbers and details of claims coded by NHS resolution in cardiothoracic surgery from 2004 to 2017 were requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The data provided in successful claims is further breakdown into damages paid to the claimant, defence cost, claimant cost paid and the sum of the three. In contrast, unsuccessful claims only include the defence cost. Moreover, data provided also includes further analysis of primary causes and primary injuries for Claims Closed/Settled with damages paid. There were 753 claims recorded from 2004 to 2017, of which 415 (55.11%) were successful. The number of claims has been steadily increasing since 2004, with two significant raises from 2009/10 to 2010/11 (37-55, 48.64% raise) and 2012/13 to 2013/14 (49-69, 40.82% raise). The mean successful claim ratio was 69.58% (range, 47.56%- 83.33%) There is also a steady increase in the successful ratio from 2004 to 2017. In summary, this is the first study published in relation to litigation claims on cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom. The results have provided insight on claims made against cardiothoracic surgery.


Assuntos
Previsões , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido
13.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 80(7): 387-390, 2019 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31283388

RESUMO

The costs of litigation are large and increasing, to a level that places a drain on precious health-care resources and affects the way medicine is practised. This article examines whether a change to a no-fault legal system would lead to reduced costs and improved patient care.


Assuntos
Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Medicina Estatal/economia , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia
15.
Int J Surg ; 66: 84-88, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055078

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2015-16, the National Health Service (NHS) Litigation Authority received 10,965 claims for clinical negligence, with surgery having the highest number of claims. Currently a sum amounting to 25% of the annual NHS budget has been ring-fenced to meet extant claims. Claims made on a basis of inadequate informed consent are increasingly seen with many achieving a successful plaintiff outcome. There are presently no UK guidelines for thyroidectomy consent. METHOD: A prospective study was performed to investigate current consent practice among the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS) membership and patients having previously undergone thyroidectomy. For surgeons, the Bolam legal test applied where surgeons declared what risks and complications they routinely consented for during their practice. A study was also undertaken in patients who had previously undergone thyroidectomy for cancer applying the rule of Montgomery. RESULTS: Consent practice from 193 surgeons and data from 415 patients was analysed. In total thyroidectomy for cancer, 95% of surgeons consent for Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) injury and temporary or permanent voice change. 70% specifically consent for External Laryngeal Nerve (ELN) injury, 50% for tracheostomy and 55% for general anaesthetic associated complications. Analysis of patient data showed they would like to be consented for far more risks than they are presently informed about in general medical practice. There was significant variation in the consenting practice in BAETS surgeons. CONCLUSION: A BAETS approved consensus guideline to standardise UK consent practice would be appropriate. This may reduce complaints, litigation claims and guide expert witnesses.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Tireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Tireoidectomia/normas , Adulto , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Traumatismos do Nervo Laríngeo/etiologia , Masculino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Traumatismos do Nervo Laríngeo Recorrente/etiologia , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
16.
BMJ Open ; 9(4): e024156, 2019 04 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987985

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Explore the impact of changes to commissioning introduced in England by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA) on cervical screening activity in areas identified empirically as particularly affected organisationally by the reforms. METHODS: Qualitative followed by quantitative methods. Qualitative: semi-structured interviews (with NHS commissioners, managers, clinicians, senior administrative staff from Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), local authorities, service providers), observations of commissioning meetings in two metropolitan areas of England. Quantitative: triple-difference analysis of national administrative data. Variability in the expected effects of HSCA on commissioning was measured by comparing CCGs working with one local authority with CCGs working with multiple local authorities. To control for unmeasured confounders, differential changes over time in cervical screening rates (among women, 25-64 years) between CCGs more and less likely to have been affected by HSCA commissioning organisational change were compared with another outcome-unassisted birth rates-largely unaffected by HSCA changes. RESULTS: Interviewees identified that cervical screening commissioning and provision was more complex and 'fragmented', with responsibilities less certain, following the HSCA. Interviewees predicted this would reduce cervical screening rates in some areas more than others. Quantitative findings supported these predictions. Areas where CCGs dealt with multiple local authorities experienced a larger decline in cervical screening rates (1.4%) than those dealing with one local authority (1.0%). Over the same period, unassisted deliveries decreased by 1.6% and 2.0%, respectively, in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Arrangements for commissioning and delivering cervical screening were disrupted and made more complex by the HSCA. Areas most affected saw a greater decline in screening rates than others. The fact that this was identified qualitatively and then confirmed quantitatively strengthens this finding. The study suggests large-scale health system reforms may have unintended consequences, and that complex commissioning arrangements may be problematic.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inglaterra , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inovação Organizacional , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração
19.
Eur Spine J ; 27(11): 2693-2699, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30151803

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the true incidence of all clinical negligence claims against spinal surgery performed by orthopaedic spinal surgeons and neurosurgeons in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, including both open and closed claims. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 978 clinical negligence claims held by NHS Resolution against spinal surgery cases identified from claims against 'Neurosurgery' and 'Orthopaedic Surgery'. This category included all emergency, trauma and elective work and all open and closed cases without exclusion between April 2012 and April 2017. RESULTS: Clinical negligence claims in spinal surgery were estimated to cost £535.5 million over this five-year period. There is a trend of both increasing volume and estimated costs of claims. The most common causes for claims were 'judgement/timing' (512 claims, 52.35%), 'interpretation of results/clinical picture' (255 claims, 26.07%), 'unsatisfactory outcome to surgery' (192 claims, 19.63%), 'fail to warn/informed consent' (80 claims, 8.13%) and 'never events' including 'wrong site surgery' or 'retained instrument post-operation' (26 claims, 2.66%). A sub-analysis of 3 years including 574 claims revealed the most prevalent pathologies were iatrogenic nerve damage (132 claims, 23.00%), cauda equina syndrome (CES) (131 claims, 22.82%), inadequate decompression (91 claims, 15.85%), iatrogenic cord damage (72 claims, 12.54%), and infection (51 claims, 8.89%). CONCLUSIONS: The volume and costs of clinical negligence claims is threatening the future of spinal surgery. If spinal surgery is to continue to serve the patients who need it, most thorough investigation, implementation and sharing of lessons learned from litigation claims must be systematically carried out. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Medicina Estatal , Inglaterra , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal/economia , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 20(3): 205-209, 2018 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30152770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the burden of successful litigation relating to wrist and hand injuries and surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using the English national litigation data-base, National Health Service Litigation Authority database. RESULTS: A total of 325 successful claims were analysed from 2002-2012. The total cost of successful claims was £19.5 million. This comprised £10.9 million in damages, with £8.4 million in legal costs (23% in NHS legal costs, the remainder being claimant costs). The mean cost of settling a claim for wrist and hand injuries respectively was £60,325 (range £200 - £669,471) and £58,926 (range £1000-£ 374,077). The commonest cause of claim for both wrist and hand injuries was poor outcome. The average cost for wrist and hand injury respectively was £52,825 and £63,926. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The complexity of resolving these cases is reflected in the associated legal costs, which represent a significant proportion of payouts. 2. This paper helps improve our understanding of factors instigating successful legal proceedings to aid identification of areas where practice and training can be improved.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Mão/cirurgia , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Traumatismos do Punho/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA