Education Competencies for Integrative Oncology in Germany: Results of a Stakeholder Engagement Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Integrative Medicine (IM) training programs in oncology lacked standardized education core competencies to ensure the practical relevance of its learning content and objectives. In a previous international and interprofessional consensus procedure, core competencies were developed for health professionals working in Integrative Oncology (IO). However, the transferability of the developed core competencies to IO physicians working in Germany has not yet been verified. The overall aim of this survey study as part of the KOKON Project (Kompetenznetzwerk Komplementärmedizin in der Onkologie; Competence Network Complementary Medicine in Oncology) was to investigate if the international core competencies developed for IO for a broader group of health professionals are suitable for physicians in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Paper-pencil and digital questionnaires were distributed amongst various stakeholder groups (cancer patients and representatives; IO physicians; members of IM organization and IM researchers; multipliers of cancer support groups). The stakeholders were asked to rate the 37 core competencies developed according to their importance for the respective stakeholder group (not important, moderately, very important). Analyses were conducted using a 60% agreement threshold for medium to highly important competencies and 50% agreement threshold for highly important competencies. RESULTS: We contacted different persons from various stakeholder groups (n > 370) with a survey response rate of 55.5-68.4% (n = 271) depending on the respective stakeholder group. Using the 50% agreement threshold, all competencies were accepted by the stakeholder groups. 27 competencies were considered very important by 60% of the survey participants. In particular, cancer patients and cancer support groups showed similar results. CONCLUSION: The list of developed international core competencies for IM health professionals seems to be suitable for physicians providing IO in Germany according to different stakeholder groups. The implementation of competencies can support the development of evidence-based, patient-centered training programs for physicians.

Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Pediatric Oncology - Development and Evaluation of a Blended Learning Program.

BACKGROUND: A blended learning program to promote the consultation expertise of pediatric oncologists (POs) on complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) was developed and completed by POs as part of a training program. A previous study indicated that POs in Germany were in need of information and training on CIM, and that there were no medical training offers on the subject in Germany. METHODS: Evaluation of e-learning (questionnaires) and practically oriented one-day, face-to-face workshops (questionnaires, simulation patients), the workshops were evaluated with regard to changes in quality of physician-patient interaction and with regard of the participants' feedback. RESULTS: 32 POs signed up for the program and completed the e-learning. 22 POs participated in one of the workshops. POs agreed that they had received professionally relevant content during the e-learning. The questionnaires on physician-patient interaction showed neither clear positive nor negative changes concerning the quality of interaction. The feedback from the participants on the workshop was very positive. CONCLUSION: Following the end of the blended learning program the e-learning was made available again for interested POs. 34 further applications were received for participation in this part of the training program. With around 300 POs in Germany, this shows a high demand for further training offers of this kind as well as a need for further development.

Integrative medicine and health in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education.

Background and objective: Integrative Medicine and Health (IMH) is a theory-based paradigm shift for health, disease and health care, which can probably only be achieved by supplementing medical roles and competences. Definition of IMH: The definitions of the Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicineand Health 2015 and the so-called Berlin Agreement: Self-Responsibility and Social Action in Practicing and Fostering Integrative Medicine and Health Globally are used. The basic features of evidence-based Integrative Medicine and Health (EB-IMH) are based on the recommendations on EBM by David L. Sackett. Global State of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Education (UG-PGME) for IMH: The USA and Canada are most advanced in the development of IMH regarding practice, teaching and research worldwide. Despite socio-cultural peculiarities, they can provide guidance for Europe and especially for Germany. Of interest here are competences for UG-PGME in IMH in primary care and in some specialist disciplines (e.g. internal medicine, gynecology, pediatrics, geriatrics, oncology, palliative care). For these specialties, the need for an interprofessional UG-PGME for IMH was shown in the early stages of development. UG-PGME for IMH in Germany: In the course of the development of the new Medical Licensure Act in Germany (ÄApprO), based on a revision of the National Competence-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Medicine (NKLM 2.0) and new regulations for Postgraduate Medical Education in Germany, suggestions for an extension of UG-PGME are particularly topical. To some extent there are already approaches to IMH. Old and new regulations are set out and are partly compared. As a result, some essential elements of IMH are mapped in the new ÄApprO. The new regulations for Postgraduate Medical Education do not mention IMH. Conclusion: The development of medical competences for IMH in the continuum of the UG-PGME could be supported by the coordinated introduction of appropriate entrustable professional activities (EPA) and IMH sub-competences combined with appropriate assessment.

Evaluation of a blended-learning training concept to train oncology physicians to advise their patients about complementary and integrative medicine (KOKON-KTO): study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Many cancer patients are interested in complementary and integrative medicine during and after regular cancer treatment. Given the high number of users it is important that physicians and patients engage in a dialog about useful complementary and integrative medicine therapies during cancer treatment. In a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized evaluation study we will develop, implement and evaluate a training program for oncology physicians advising their patients on complementary and integrative medicine. The main objective of the study is to evaluate whether training physicians in a blended-learning approach (e-learning + skills-training workshop) in providing advice to their cancer patients on complementary and integrative medicine, in addition to handing out an information leaflet about reputable websites, has different effects on the outcomes of patients, physicians, and their interaction level, compared to only giving out the information leaflet. METHODS/DESIGN: Forty-eight oncology physicians will be included into a cluster-randomized trial to either participate or not in the blended-learning training. Physicians will then advise 10 cancer patients each, resulting in 480 patients participating in the trial. The blended learning consists of nine units of up to 45 min of e-learning and 18 units of up to 45 min of on-site skills-training workshop focusing. Outcomes will be measured on the physician, patient, and physician-patient-interaction level. DISCUSSION: A blended-learning program for oncology physicians to advise their cancer patients in a systematic way and a reasonable time frame on complementary and integrative medicine will be evaluated in depth in a large cluster-randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00012704 . Registered on 28 August 2017.

Referrals of Plastic Surgery Patients to Integrative Medicine Centers: A Review of Resource Utility.

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine (IM) centers are becoming more established nationwide and provide an expansive range of therapeutic services. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among plastic surgery patients, we sought to define referrals rates to IM centers by plastic surgeons to investigate (1) the role of IM in the continuous care process of plastic surgery patients and (2) whether IM centers are being effectively utilized. METHODS: Institutions with plastic surgery residency programs were identified using the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System in January 2017. Data on the presence of a named IM center, director/administrator contact information, and types of therapeutic services offered were extracted. The total number of IM services at these centers was summed and tabulated for preliminary analyses. A survey questionnaire was sent to the center to ascertain referral patterns in February 2017. RESULTS: Of 96 institutions with plastic and reconstructive surgery residency programs in North America, 49 (51%) provide IM services, and 24 (25%) have affiliated named IM centers of which we attained a survey response from 13 (54.5%). Of these centers, 10 (76.9%) evaluate more than 50 patients per week. Patient referrals to these centers were primarily from the department of medicine (73.8%) as opposed to surgery (13.1%) (P < 0.0001). An average of 0.77% of surgical referrals, or 0.077% of all referrals, arose from plastic and reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons appear to infrequently refer patients to IM centers. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among our patient population, IM centers are an underutilized adjunct in the care of our patients. Further study into specific IM services that may benefit our patients would be helpful in increasing IM utilization in our field.

O paciente somos nós: um estudo de caso sobre experiências e produção do cuidado em um contexto de práticas integrativas e complementares de saúde / We are the patient: a case study on care experiences and production in a context of integrative and complementary health practices

Introdução: As práticas integrativas e complementares de saúde (PICS) vem apresentando um crescimento na oferta e na demanda dos serviços de saúde. Apesar dessa expansão, ainda há pouco conhecimento científico sobre os contextos em que ocorre a experiência de implementação dessas práticas de cuidado, as quais fogem à lógica das terapêuticas ofertadas pela medicina convencional. Objetivo: Compreender as práticas e as experiências de cuidado de usuários e profissionais em um ambulatório de práticas integrativas e complementares de saúde. Método: Estudo qualitativo, de abordagem etnográfica, no qual foram utilizados elementos da antropologia médica com referencial interpretativo. Participaram do estudo 19 informantes, sendo 10 profissionais que atuam no local e 9 usuários que recebem cuidado no ambulatório. A coleta de dados foi realizada em um ambulatório social na cidade de São Paulo no período de setembro de 2017 a dezembro de 2018, mediante observação participante e entrevista semi-estruturada. Os dados foram submetidos à análise indutiva temática. Resultados: Três temas emergiram: Itinerário terapêutico até às PICS, Experiências de cuidado com as PICS e Pontos de vista em relação ao cuidado. Os resultados revelaram que as práticas de cuidado no contexto priorizaram as relações intersubjetivas, o estabelecimento de laços de confiança e o cuidar focado no colocar-se no lugar do outro. O cuidado foi significado pelos participantes como oportunidades de inter-relações e entrosamento, as quais influenciam os sujeitos culturalmente e conferem eficácia simbólica ao ato profissional. A experiência dos sujeitos tornou-se um referencial para reinterpretação e compreensão do processo saúde-doença. Considerações ao final do estudo: Os dados apresentados neste estudo permitiram contribuir para maior exploração do tema, o que pode proporcionar maior expansão, visibilidade e legitimação das PICS entre profissionais e a população em geral. Refletir sobre práticas de saúde holística pode fomentar a integração de outras formas de cuidado no cotidiano da assistência à saúde nos diversos contextos da rede de serviços de saúde

Introduction: Integrative and complementary health practices (PICS) have been showing a growth in the supply and demand of health services. Despite this expansion, there is still little scientific knowledge about the contexts in which the experience of implementing these care practices occurs, which is beyond the logic of the therapies offered by conventional medicine. Objective: To understand the practices and care experiences of users and professionals in an outpatient clinic of integrative and complementary health practices. Method: Qualitative study with ethnographic approach, in which elements of medical anthropology with interpretative framework were used. Nineteen informants participated in the study, being 10 professionals who work at the site and 9 clients who receive care at the outpatient clinic. Data collection was performed at a social outpatient clinic in the city of São Paulo from September 2017 to December 2018, through participant observation and half-structured interview. Data were submitted to inductive thematic analysis. Results: Three themes emerged: Therapeutic Itinerary to PICS, PICS Care Experiences and Views regarding caring. The results revealed that the care practices in the context prioritized the intersubjective relationships, the establishment of bonds of trust and the care focused on putting oneself in the other's place. The care was meant by the participants as opportunities for interrelationships and interaction, which influence the subjects culturally and confer symbolic effectiveness to the professional act. The subjects' experience became a reference for reinterpretation and understanding of the health-disease process. Final considerations: The data presented in this study allowed to contribute to further exploration of the theme, which can provide greater expansion, visibility and legitimation of PICS between professionals and the general population. Reflecting on holistic health practices can foster the integration of other forms of care in daily health care in the various contexts of the health service network

Training Oncology Physicians to Advise Their Patients on Complementary and Integrative Medicine.

To address the needs of cancer patients, two things are important: (1) oncology physicians and other health professionals in cancer care should receive training so that they can guide their patients through the maze of available offers in complementary and integrative medicine (CIM), and (2) more CIM providers should possess competencies to provide evidence-informed CIM treatments to cancer patients.

Integrative Oncology Scholars Program: A Model for Integrative Oncology Education.

OBJECTIVES: Oncology providers are often confronted by patients who use complementary or alternative therapies, but have limited knowledge or confidence on how to advise patients on appropriate use. Despite this, there are few opportunities for oncology providers to learn about complementary or alternative therapies, while at the same time there is a high demand for integrative oncology (IO) training. To address a gap in IO educational opportunities, and particularly for nonphysicians, we created the Integrative Oncology Scholars (IOS) Program. The program's goal is to train 100 IO leaders and facilitate partnerships between them and complementary practitioners. DESIGN: Four iterations of a year-long National Cancer Institute-funded educational program that combines in-person team-based learning and eLearning to teach the evidence, application, and philosophy supporting IO. SETTINGS: In-person sessions take place at the University of Michigan, and eLearning is implemented using a Canvas website (Instructure, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). SUBJECTS: Nurses, social workers, physician assistants, psychologists, physicians, pharmacists, and physical/occupational therapists with active oncology practices. Educational intervention: Four cohorts of 25 oncology providers per year will learn the evidence base for complementary and alternative approaches to a wide number of oncology topics, including symptom control, dietary supplements commonly used by cancer patients, diet, and the utility of specific integrative approaches for common oncology side-effects such as fatigue. OUTCOME MEASURES: A mixed methods approach will be used to evaluate overall IOS Program progress and individual scholar's impact on IO research, education, and clinical endeavors. RESULTS: The first cohort of 25 IOS has been recruited and their education will begin in Summer 2018. Scholars come from 13 states and represent 23 different healthcare systems. CONCLUSIONS: The IOS Program has the potential to increase the number of trained IO providers, educators, and researchers in the United States.

Integrated Behavioral Medicine in Cancer Care: Utilizing a Training Program Model to Provide Psychological Services in an Urban Cancer Center.

Psycho-oncology has come of age as its own unique subspecialty under the umbrella of oncology, vastly refining our knowledge regarding the psychosocial impact of cancer and fostering acceptance of the psychological underpinnings of the cancer experience, in turn improving the overall quality of cancer care. The importance of integrating psychological practice into the comprehensive treatment of cancer has become readily apparent, and psychosocial support services are increasing in quantity and breadth. It is the aim of this article to present a cogent argument for the proliferation of Integrated Behavioral Medicine (IBM) programs in both inpatient and outpatient clinical cancer treatment centers via an in-depth discussion of a successful IBM program including analysis of program structure, service delivery model and description of clinical services provided, and a longitudinal review of referral trends.

The Next Generation of Dietitians: Implementing Dietetics Education and Practice in Integrative Medicine.

Integrative medicine is a quickly expanding field of health care that emphasizes nutrition as a key component. Dietitians and nutritionists have an opportunity to meet workforce demands by practicing dietetics and integrative medicine (DIM). The purpose of this article is to describe a DIM education program and practicum. We report the results of an interprofessional nutrition education and practicum program between the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) Department of Dietetics and Nutrition and KU Integrative Medicine. This partnered program provides training that builds on the strong foundation of the Nutrition Care Process and adds graduate-level educational and practicum experiences in foundational integrative medicine knowledge, including nutritional approaches from a systems biology perspective, nutrigenomics, and biochemistry as the core knowledge to understand the root cause of a chronic disorder and to choose appropriate nutritional tools for interventions. This interprofessional KUMC program provides a dietetic internship, master's degree, and graduate certificate in DIM and fulfills a need for dietitians and nutritionists who seek careers practicing in an integrative medicine setting. The program fulfills expanding workforce needs to provide quality health care for patients with chronic illnesses.

The subjectively perceived quality of postgraduate medical training in integrative medicine within the public healthcare systems of Germany and Switzerland: the example of anthroposophic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine (IM) integrates evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) with conventional medicine (CON). Medical schools offer basic CAM electives but in postgraduate medical training (PGMT) little has been done for the integration of CAM. An exception to this is anthroposophic medicine (AM), a western form of CAM based on CON, offering an individualized holistic IM approach. AM hospitals are part of the public healthcare systems in Germany and Switzerland and train AM in PGMT. We performed the first quality evaluation of the subjectively perceived quality of this PGMT. METHODS: An anonymous full survey of all 214 trainers (TR) and 240 trainees (TE) in all 15 AM hospitals in Germany and Switzerland, using the ETHZ questionnaire for annual national PGMT assessments in Switzerland (CH) and Germany (D), complemented by a module for AM. Data analysis included Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency questionnaire scales, 2-tailed Pearson correlation of specific quality dimensions of PGMT and department size, 2-tailed Wilcoxon Matched-Pair test for dependent variables and 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test for independent variables to calculate group differences. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Return rates were: D: TE 89/215 (41.39%), TR 78/184 (42.39%); CH: TE 19/25 (76%), TR 22/30 (73.33%). Cronbach's alpha values for TE scales were >0.8 or >0.9, and >0.7 to >0.5 for TR scales. Swiss hospitals surpassed German ones significantly in Global Satisfaction with AM (TR and TE); Clinical Competency training in CON (TE) and AM (TE, TR), Error Management, Culture of Decision Making, Evidence-based Medicine, and Clinical Competency in internal medicine CON and AM (TE). When the comparison was restricted to departments of comparable size, differences remained significant for Clinical Competencies in AM (TE, TR), and Culture of Decision Making (TE). CON received better grades than AM in Global Satisfaction and Clinical Competency. Quality of PGMT depended on department size, working conditions and structural training features. CONCLUSION: The lower quality of PGMT in German hospitals can be attributed to larger departments, more difficult working conditions, and less favorable structural features for PGMT in AM, possibly also in relation to increased financial pressure.

[The situation of complementary medicine in Germany]. / Zur lage der komplementärmedizin in Deutschland.

With the amendment of the German Medicinal Products Act in 1976 and the inclusion of naturopathy and homeopathy into the German Medical Licensure Act from 1988, the German government set up a comparatively favorable framework for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). But no comprehensive integration into the academic operating systems followed, because the universities as well as the legislative body seemed to have no further interest in CAM. Therefore, research projects in the field and suitable professorships had and still have to be financed by third-party funds. Notwithstanding the success of several CAM-projects, no sustainable development could be established: When the third-party funding runs off and the protagonists retire the institutional structures are supposed to vanish as well. Although the public demand for CAM is high in Germany, the administration detached homeopathy as a compulsory subject from the German Medical Licensure Act in 2002 and restricted severely the refunding of naturopathic medicines by the statutory health insurance in 2004. Moreover, the trend for CAM bashing takes root in the media. Unfortunately the CAM scene does not close ranks and is incapable to implement fundamental data collection processes into daily clinical routine: A wide range of data could justify further efforts to the government as well as to the scientific community. To say something positive, it must be mentioned that the scientific standard of CAM research is high for the most part and that third-party funded projects deliver remarkable results ever and on.

The model of Western integrative medicine: the role of Chinese medicine.

The basic concept of integrative medicine (IM) is that by combining mainstream (biomedicine) with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), synergistic therapeutic effects can be attained. When the methods of mind/body medicine (MBM) are added to this combination, as in Western countries, a new concept emerges that drastically changes the approach toward illness.It is interesting to note that the joining of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in the early days of the Peoples' Republic of China preceded the Western model of IM by almost 50 years. Several elements that make up the key components of IM as practiced today in the West were already present in the Chinese version of IM, and Chinese medicine has played and continues to play an important role in advancing IM. However, one of the major differences between the Chinese and the Western models of IM today, besides MBM and some other treatment options, is that Western integrative medicine (WIM) strictly requires its CAM methods to be supported by scientific evidence.The therapeutic methods of IM and their applications are many and varied. However, they are most frequently employed to treat chronic medical conditions, e.g., bronchial asthma, rheumatic disease, chronic inflammatory bowel disorder and chronic pain. Other fields in which IM may be applied are internal medicine (inflammatory bowel diseases and cardiovascular diseases), musculoskeletal disorders, oncology (chemotherapy-induced side effects), obstetrics and gynecology (dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, infertility and menopausal complaints), pediatrics, geriatrics, neurology (migraine and chronic headache), and psychiatry (anxiety and depression).The concept of WIM is discussed here in detail by reviewing its scope and implications for the practice of medicine and focusing on the role of Chinese medicine in WIM.

Quality management in complementary and integrative medicine.

Quality management (QM) is an important tool for an effective and safe healthcare which also includes complementary and integrative medicine. Improving the three areas of quality (quality of structure, quality of process, and quality of results) is beneficial for patients and providers. Improvements of process, product and QM systems have a direct impact on time, quality, human resources, and costs. As a result, patient care improves and physicians and statutory sickness funds will benefit from increased efficiency. Several QM systems with different main focus exist. First publications about QM in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals are from the 1990s. In order to increase the benefit and to avoid pitfalls, the implementation of a QM system should be planned systematically.

Complementary and alternative medicine: oncology nurses' knowledge and attitudes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe oncology nurses' complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) knowledge and attitudes. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional. SETTING: A national medical center and research institute. SAMPLE: A random sample of 850 Oncology Nursing Society members who are RNs involved in direct care. METHODS: Respondents completed a demographic questionnaire and the Nurse Complementary and Alternative Medicine Knowledge and Attitude survey. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the participants' CAM knowledge and attitudes. In addition, participants' comments were transcribed and content analysis was conducted. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: CAM knowledge and attitudes. FINDINGS: The participants' mean CAM knowledge score was 70%. Attitudes varied according to beliefs, practice, and role, but were positive overall. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing oncology nurses' CAM knowledge is important for developing appropriate educational programs that will help nurses support and advocate for patients. In addition, assessing CAM attitudes will provide insight for realizing and sustaining robust changes to health care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses should be prepared with insightful CAM knowledge and attitudes to provide prudent and unbiased information to patients.

Integrative therapies in hospice and home health: introduction and adoption.

Integrative therapies comprise a variety of nonpharmacologic methods that provide pain and symptom management. These therapies are increasingly gaining acceptance in the healthcare community as complementary to traditional treatments for pain. This article details the introduction, scope, and challenges healthcare organizations face when incorporating integrative therapies into their care plans.