Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e041324, 2021 01 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495253

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To advance understanding of how message framing can be used to maximise public support across different pricing policies for alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks/foods that prevent consumption of cancer-causing products. DESIGN: We designed a 3×4×3 randomised factorial experiment to test responses to messages with three pricing policies, four message frames and three products. SETTING: Online survey panel (Qualtrics) in 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=1850) from the UK and USA. INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomly viewed one of 36 separate messages that varied by pricing policy (increasing taxes, getting rid of price discounts, getting rid of low-cost products), four frames and product (alcohol, tobacco, sugary drinks/foods). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the relationship between the message characteristics and four dependent variables. Three were related to policy support: (1) increasing taxes on the product mentioned in the message, (2) getting rid of price discounts and special offers on the product mentioned in the message and (3) getting rid of low-cost versions of the product mentioned in the message. One was related to reactance, a psychological response to having one's freedom limited. RESULTS: We found no effect for pricing policy in the message. Frames regarding children and reducing cancer risk moderated some outcomes, showing promise for real-world use. We found differences in support by product and reactance with greatest support and least reactance for tobacco policies, less support and more reactance for alcohol policies, and the least support and most reactance for sugary drinks/foods policies. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer prevention efforts using policy interventions can be informed by the message framing literature. Our results offer insights for cancer prevention advocacy efforts across the UK and USA and highlight that tax versus non-tax approaches to increasing the cost of cancer-causing products result in similar responses from consumers.


Assuntos
Comércio , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Comunicação em Saúde/economia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Adulto , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Impostos , Reino Unido
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 112(8): 779-791, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health reform and the merits of Medicaid expansion remain at the top of the legislative agenda, with growing evidence suggesting an impact on cancer care and outcomes. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the association between Medicaid expansion and the goals of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the context of cancer care. The purpose of this article is to summarize the currently published literature and to determine the effects of Medicaid expansion on outcomes during points along the cancer care continuum. METHODS: A systematic search for relevant studies was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Three independent observers used an abstraction form to code outcomes and perform a quality and risk of bias assessment using predefined criteria. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies were identified. The most common outcomes assessed were the impact of Medicaid expansion on insurance coverage (23.4% of studies), followed by evaluation of racial and/or socioeconomic disparities (17.4%) and access to screening (14.5%). Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in coverage for cancer patients and survivors as well as reduced racial- and income-related disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion has led to improved access to insurance coverage among cancer patients and survivors, particularly among low-income and minority populations. This review highlights important gaps in the existing oncology literature, including a lack of studies evaluating changes in treatment and access to end-of-life care following implementation of expansion.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Medicaid , Neoplasias/terapia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/organização & administração , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/organização & administração , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Análise de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/economia , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Assistência Terminal/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 57(6): 818-825, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753263

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Poor diet and inadequate physical activity are common contributors to preventable death in the U.S. This paper provides a summary of the NIH-sponsored research on disease prevention that underlies public health and clinical recommendations to improve diet and physical activity. METHODS: A representative sample (n=11,082) of research grants and cooperative agreements (research projects) representing the NIH prevention research portfolio between 2012 and 2017 were hand coded by trained analysts in 2017-2018. This manuscript describes the rationale(s), exposure(s), outcome(s), population(s), and study design(s) in prevention research focused on diet and physical activity and compares this research to identified research gaps in the field. RESULTS: A relatively stable 7.8% (95% CI=7.0%, 8.8%) and 5.0% (95% CI=4.4%, 5.7%) of the NIH prevention research projects were focused on diet and physical activity, respectively, during 2012-2017. These projects often explored diet and physical activity together in the context of obesity, included observational studies, and focused on a general adult population. Few of these projects focused on development of improved assessment methods. Approximately 50% of these studies were related to research gaps identified by the 2015 Dietary or 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Reports. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist for more engagement by NIH and scientific investigators in diet- and physical activity-focused prevention research, particularly around assessment and known research gaps.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Comportamento Alimentar , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Idoso , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(11): 3671-3679, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29740693

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients receiving palliative care make avoidable emergency department visits (AvED), which may increase economic and social costs. However, the proportion of AvED among all patients, including cancer patients after curation, and the resulting costs are unknown in Asia. This study aimed to investigate the proportion, characteristics, and costs regarding factors associated with AvED among cancer patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the medical records of patients who visited the emergency department (ED) at a tertiary care hospital in Korea in 2016. Data regarding patients' demographic, cancer-related, and clinical characteristics were collected. RESULTS: ED visits by a total of 4346 patients were included in the analysis, of which 2420 visits (55.7%) were avoidable. In the multivariate logistic model, the following main factors were associated with AvED: stay in ED (odds ratio [OR] 0.998, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.997-0.999, P < 0.001), distance to the home from the ED (OR 0.998, 95% CI 0.997-0.999, P < 0.001), multiple ED visits in 1 year (OR 1.204, 95% CI 1.156-1.255, P < 0.001), primary progression (vs. after curation) (OR 0.748, 95% CI 0.627-0.892, P = 0.001), and chief complaint being a gastrointestinal symptom (vs. pain) (OR 1.871, 95% CI 1.188-2.946, P = 0.007). The average cost per visit in the AvED group was $369.80, and the annual total cost for all AvEDs was $894,877. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that 55.7% of all ED visits by cancer patients visiting the ED of a tertiary care hospital were avoidable, and several factors were associated with AvED.


Assuntos
Emergências , Hospitalização , Neoplasias , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências/economia , Emergências/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(9)2018 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29686026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and cancer are among the leading causes of economic burden, morbidity, and mortality in the United States. We aimed to quantify the overall impact of cardiovascular modifiable risk factor (CRF) profile on healthcare expenditures among those with and without ASCVD and/or cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 2012-2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative adult sample (≥40 years), was utilized for the study. Variables included ASCVD, CRF (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, physical activity and/or obesity), and cancer (all). Two-part econometric models analyzed cost data. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey participants (n=27 275, 59±9 years, 52% female) were studied and 14% had cancer, translating to 25.6 million US adults over 40 years of age. A higher prevalence of ASCVD was noted in those with versus without cancer (25% versus 14%). Absence of ASCVD and a more favorable CRF profile were associated with significantly lower expenditures across the spectrum of cancer diagnosis. Among cancer patients, the adjusted mean annual cost for those with and without ASCVD were $10 852 (95% confidence interval [8917, 12 788]) and $6436 (95% confidence interval [5531, 7342]). Among cancer patients without ASCVD, adjusted annual healthcare expenditures among those with optimal versus poor CRF profile were $4782 and $7256. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative US adult population, absence of ASCVD and a favorable CRF profile were associated with significantly lower medical expenditure among cancer patients. This provides estimates to continue better cardiovascular management and prevention practices, while contextualizing the burden of cancer.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 40(2): 350-358, 2018 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28525612

RESUMO

Non-communicable disease prevention strategies usually target the four major risk factors of poor diet, tobacco, alcohol and physical inactivity. Yet, the most effective approaches remain disputed. However, increasing evidence supports the concept of an effectiveness hierarchy. Thus, 'downstream' preventive activities targeting individuals (such as 1:1 personal advice, health education, 'nudge' or primary prevention medications) consistently achieve a smaller population health impact than interventions aimed further 'upstream' (for instance, smoke-free legislation, alcohol minimum pricing or regulations eliminating dietary transfats). These comprehensive, policy-based interventions reach all parts of the population and do not depend on a sustained 'agentic' individual response. They thus tend to be more effective, more rapid, more equitable and also cost-saving. This effectiveness hierarchy is self-evident to many professionals working in public health. Previously neglected in the wider world, this effectiveness hierarchy now needs to be acknowledged by policy makers.


Assuntos
Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dieta Saudável , Exercício Físico , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Doenças não Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar
10.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 26(2): 259-262, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28791843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potential benefits of screening need to be carefully balanced against the financial burden for the national health care system. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of population-based mammographic screening in the 3-million region of Lower Silesia (Poland) after initial and 3 subsequent rounds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was collected in a prospective manner using the databases of the official computer system for the monitoring of prophylaxis programs (SIMP), National Health Fund (Lower Silesia Regional Branch) and the Lower Silesia Cancer Registry. The expenses from each analyzed year were obtained from the Regional Coordinating Center for Screening Programs. The number of screen-detected and pathologically proven invasive and ductal in situ cancers was calculated. Costs of cancer detection were measured, converted into US dollars (USD), and expressed in 2015 USD using the comparison of purchasing power of money calculated with the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: The total expense for the screening program in the initial round (2007-2008), first (2009-2010), second (2011-2012) and third (2013-2014) subsequent rounds was 4 732 383, 6 043 509, 6 484 834, and 5 900 793 USD whereas the number of cancer detected was 1049, 987, 1312, and 1070. The costeffectiveness ratio obtained in the program for each year was 4511, 6123, 4943, and 5515 USD per cancer found. The average cost of breast cancer detection in screening program in the region of Lower Silesia in years 2007-2014 was 5243 USD. CONCLUSIONS: The low cost of breast cancer detection in mammographic screening program makes it applicable for the health care systems in emerging economies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Mamografia/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 28(2): 677-693, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28529217

RESUMO

The U.S. spends just 5% of its health care budget to prevent morbidity and mortality. This study surveyed N.Y. State community health centers' (CHCs) population health activities aligned with the N.Y. Prevention Agenda (response rate of 72%). More than half of CHCs considered population health a high priority. Chronic disease and reducing preventable infections were the leading activity areas. One third of activities were dedicated to patient treatment follow-up. Community health centers reported that more than two-thirds of all activities received no funding. Despite a commitment to population health among CHCs, widespread improvements in population health may remain limited without an increase in dedicated funding to support community-based prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Saúde da População , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Doença Crônica , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/economia , Meio Ambiente , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Saúde Mental , New York , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle
12.
Ann Ig ; 28(5): 313-8, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27627662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) stated that countries' health policies should give high priority to primary prevention of occupational health hazards. Scant data are available on health expenditure on workplace prevention and safety services and on its impact on occupational health outcomes in Italy and in other European countries. STUDY DESIGN: objective of the present study was to systematically retrieve, analyse and critically appraise the available national-level data on public health expenditure on workplace prevention and safety services as well as to correlate them with occupational health outcomes. METHODS: National-level data on total public health expenditure on prevention services, its share spent on workplace prevention and safety services as well as on number of workers receiving appropriate health surveillance were derived from the national public health expenditure monitoring system over a 8-year study period (2006-2013). An analytic approach was adopted to explore the association between health expenditure and occupational health services supply. RESULTS: The Italian National Health Service spends almost € 5 billion per year on preventive care, of which 13.3% are spent on workplace prevention and safety programmes (€ 645 million, € 10.6 per capita). There is wide heterogeneity between Italian regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are useful for health systems and policies analysis, national and international comparisons as well as for health policy makers to plan, implement and monitor occupational health prevention programmes.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Local de Trabalho/economia , Política de Saúde/economia , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Segurança/economia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
13.
Med Care ; 54(12): 1056-1062, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Starting in September of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act required most health insurance policies to cover evidence-based preventive care with no cost-sharing (no copays, coinsurance, or deductibles). It is unknown, however, whether declines in out-of-pocket costs for preventive services are large enough to prompt increases in utilization, the ultimate goal of the policy. METHODS: In this study, we use a nationally representative sample of ambulatory care visits to estimate the impact of the zero cost-sharing mandate on out-of-pocket expenditures on well-child and screening mammography visits. Estimates are made using 2-part interrupted time-series models, with well-woman visits serving as the control group because they were not covered under the zero cost-sharing mandate until after our study period. RESULTS: Results indicate a substantial reduction in out-of-pocket costs attributable to the Affordable Care Act. Between January 2011 and September 2012, the zero cost-sharing mandate reduced per-visit out-of-pocket costs for well-child visits from $18.46 to $8.08 (56%) and out-of-pocket costs for screening mammography visits from $25.43 to $6.50 (74%). No reduction was apparent for well-woman visits. CONCLUSIONS: The Affordable Care Act's zero cost-sharing mandate for preventive care has had a large impact on out-of-pocket expenditures for well-child and mammography visits. To increase preventive service use, research is needed to better understand barriers to obtaining preventive care that are not directly related to cost.


Assuntos
Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Criança , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Programas Obrigatórios/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
14.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 54(3): 198-204, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26091495

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The colonization with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) imposes a risk on the patient herself as well as on other patients and on healthcare professionals because, in the case of an infection, substantial health problems will arise. Moreover, additional costs for health care will occur as well. This paper examines the incentives of German rehabilitation centers to implement prevention measures in order to avert MRSA transmissions and infections. METHODS: Relying on a decision tree analysis, the expected healthcare cost per capita is calculated for the 3 strategies general screening, risk-based screening, both upon admission, and no screening at all. The values of the relevant parameters are identified by a review of the published literature. RESULTS: From the perspective of a rehabilitation center, undertaking no screening at all minimizes the expected cost of treatment while the first strategy causes the highest cost. This ordering is robust with respect to multivariate sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In Germany, rehabilitation centers currently are not reimbursed for the implementation of additional prevention measures against MRSA. Hence, as our analysis demonstrates, the financial incentive to implement MRSA screening turns out to be rather weak. This could well be inefficient for society because a substantial part of the benefit arising on other agents is not taken into account. Our results can be used to indicate changes in the remuneration system that would provide rehabilitation centers with an appropriate incentive for MRSA prevention. Moreover, hygiene regulations enacted recently such as the change in the Infection Prevention Act or the Medical Hygiene regulations emphasize the significance of an appropriate hygiene regimen, thus fostering MRSA prevention.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Centros de Reabilitação/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Administração Financeira/métodos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico
15.
Gesundheitswesen ; 77(6): 397-404, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111361

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examines what role the German statutory health insurance (GKV) has in health promotion and prevention, if regulations and incentives are consistent, and if the politically-intended strengthening of prevention has been achieved. METHODS: We compiled the regulations and incentives of the German Sozialgesetzbuch V as the legal basis for health promotion and prevention of the GKV and studied their effects and interactions. Using annual financial reports of GKV we determined how the spending in prevention overall and in specific fields of prevention has -developed. RESULTS: The responsibilities of the GKV in health promotion and prevention lack a clear scientific foundation. Regulations have been incrementally added following changing ideas in prevention and health promotion policies. Currently, different norms and a variety of incentives lead to inconsistent and conflicting aims. Only 2% of all expenditures of the GKV are for health promotion and prevention, mainly spent for medical measures like preventive medical check-ups or vaccination. While spending of the GKV in general is rising, expenditures for prevention have decreased since 2009. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to harmonise the different regulations in health promotion and prevention and to correct currently inconsistent incentives in the GKV. Given the similar evidence base there seems to be no reason why responsibilities for health promotion and primary, secondary or tertiary prevention should be regulated by different normative constructs. Incentives should account for the different aims of health insurers and their members. Financial incentives to increase spending in prevention may be particularly effective when there is no short-term -financial interest for the health insurer.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/economia , Promoção da Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Reembolso de Incentivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Alemanha , Regulamentação Governamental , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia
16.
Br Med Bull ; 105: 7-27, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23571458

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) caused an estimated 36 million deaths in 2008. Recognizing that NCDs are a global health and development priority, Heads of State and government adopted the Political Declaration on NCDs (resolution A/RES/66/2) at the United Nations General Assembly in September 2011. SOURCES OF DATA: The Political Declaration of the United Nations High Level meeting on NCDs, World Health Organization (WHO) reports on NCDs and WHO Country Cooperation Strategy documents. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: NCDs are a growing threat to health and development. Cost of action and inaction are known. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Accountability of all stakeholders including the private sector is essential for an effective global public health response. More clarity is needed on the private sector contribution to the response to safeguard public health from any potential conflict of interest. GROWING POINTS: A country-led public health policy response should include, at a minimum, national scale-up of very cost-effective, high impact NCD interventions to improve health outcomes and health equity with universal coverage as a long-term public health goal. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Policy reform and accelerated national scale-up action, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries, must be guided by translation research and feedback information from monitoring and evaluation.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Política , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade , Organização Mundial da Saúde/organização & administração
17.
Lancet ; 381(9866): 575-84, 2013 Feb 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23410607

RESUMO

Strong leadership from heads of state is needed to meet national commitments to the UN political declaration on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and to achieve the goal of a 25% reduction in premature NCD mortality by 2025 (the 25 by 25 goal). A simple, phased, national response to the political declaration is suggested, with three key steps: planning, implementation, and accountability. Planning entails mobilisation of a multisectoral response to develop and support the national action plan, and to build human, financial, and regulatory capacity for change. Implementation of a few priority and feasible cost-effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of NCDs will achieve the 25 by 25 goal and will need only few additional financial resources. Accountability incorporates three dimensions: monitoring of progress, reviewing of progress, and appropriate responses to accelerate progress. A national NCD commission or equivalent, which is independent of government, is needed to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are held accountable for the UN commitments to NCDs.


Assuntos
Medicina Preventiva , Nações Unidas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Sódio na Dieta
18.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(1): 21-4, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23290669

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The 2009 release of updated US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on screening mammography differed sharply from those of the American Cancer Society, the ACR, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The aim of this study was to ascertain the effect of these recommendations on the utilization of screening mammography in the Medicare population. METHODS: The Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 2005 through 2010 were used to determine the annual utilization rate of screening mammography from 2005 to 2010. A utilization trend line was plotted for those years. RESULTS: The utilization rate of screening mammography per 1,000 women in the Medicare population was 311.6 in 2005 and increased gradually each year to 322.9 in 2009 (a compound annual growth rate of 0.9%). However, after the USPSTF recommendations were issued in late 2009, this rate decreased abruptly to 309.1 (-4.3%) in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The abrupt decrease in the utilization of screening mammography in 2010 was in sharp contrast to the previous slow annual increases in its utilization from 2005 to 2009. Because there are no other factors to explain a decrease of this magnitude, it would seem that the USPSTF recommendations and the ensuing publicity resulted in a decrease in the utilization of screening mammography in the Medicare population in the first year after issuance of the new recommendations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Comitês Consultivos , Fatores Etários , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Mamografia/economia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Formulação de Políticas , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
19.
Gesundheitswesen ; 75(1): 7-12, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22836934

RESUMO

Medical benefit is the crucial factor in the evidence-based decision-making process of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) of Germany. To review the decisions on population-based screening methods from January 2000 to December 2009, we analysed the coverage decisions. During this period of time, the G-BA decided on 14 screening methods, predominantly dealing with the early diagnoses of serious diseases. In 8 cases a positive assessment led to reimbursement by the statutory health insurance funds, in 5 cases the assessment was negative and in one case the conditions were changed. For 7 assessments, a fully reported review was available, 4 of this were positively evaluated. In 2 of these cases, controlled screening studies documented the benefit of the screening method. In another case there was only a case series without a control group. For the fourth method, the question for the benefit of the screening method was divided into 3 sub questions, investigated separately in different studies. The methods of benefit assessments have changed very much over time. A revision of the rules of procedure for the assessment of medical screening methods is advisable.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Precoce , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Bull World Health Organ ; 90(2): 88-96, 2012 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22423159

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore a risk factor approach for identifying preventive interventions that require more in-depth economic assessment, including cost-effectiveness analyses. METHODS: A three-step approach was employed to: (i) identify the risk factors that contribute most substantially to disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); (ii) re-rank these risk factors based on the availability of effective preventive interventions warranting further cost-effectiveness analysis (and in some instances on evidence from existing cost-effectiveness analyses); and (iii) re-rank these risk factors in accordance with their relative contribution to health inequalities. Health inequalities between the Maori and non-Maori populations in New Zealand were used by way of illustration. FINDINGS: Seven of the top 10 risk factors prioritized for research on preventive interventions in New Zealand were also among the 10 risk factors most highly ranked as contributing to DALYs in high-income countries of the World Health Organization's Western Pacific Region. The final list of priority risk factors included tobacco use; alcohol use; high blood pressure; high blood cholesterol; overweight/obesity, and physical inactivity. All of these factors contributed to health inequalities. Effective interventions for preventing all of them are available, and for each risk factor there is at least one documented cost-saving preventive intervention. CONCLUSION: The straightforward approach to prioritizing risk factors described in this paper may be applicable in many countries, and even in those countries that lack the capacity to perform additional cost-effectiveness analyses, this approach will still make it possible to determine which cost-effective interventions should be implemented in the short run.


Assuntos
Medicina Preventiva/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Saúde Global , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA