Acute versus non-acute targeted muscle reinnervation for pain control following major limb amputation: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to reduce phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) after major limb amputation. However, the effect of the timing of surgery on pain control and quality of life outcomes is controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of acute TMR for pain prevention with non-acute TMR for the treatment of established pain. METHODS: All patients treated with TMR in our institution between January 2018 and December 2021 were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively. Pain intensity and quality of life outcomes were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (Pain Severity and Pain Interference scales) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Outcomes were compared between acute and non-acute TMR using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to account for repeat measures and potential pain confounders. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with 38 major limb amputations were included. Acute TMR patients reported significantly lower RLP and PLP scores, pain interference and pain catastrophisation at all time points (p < 0.05). Acute TMR was significantly associated with lower pain severity and pain interference in a linear mixed-effects model accounting for patient age, gender, amputation indication, amputation site, time post-TMR and repeated surveys (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Acute TMR was associated with clinically and statistically significant pain outcomes that were better than that in non-acute TMR. This suggests that TMR should be performed with preventative intent, when possible, as part of a multidisciplinary approach to pain management, rather than deferred until the development of chronic pain.

Phantom sensation in genital gender-affirming surgery: a narrative review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review findings related to phantom genital sensation, emphasizing phantom sensation in the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population. We discuss prevalence, presentation and potential implications for sensory outcomes in genital gender-affirming surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a high prevalence of phantom genital sensations in the TGD population. The prevalence varies by body part, approaching 50% in the most frequently reported transgender phantom - the phantom penis. Unlike genital phantoms that occur after trauma or surgery which are often painful, transgender phantoms are typically neutral and often erogenous in experience. Phantom sensation in the TGD population can be an affirming experience and important part of sexual well being and embodiment. SUMMARY: Recent studies have begun to characterize the prevalence and presentations of phantom genital sensations in TGD people, informing our evolving understanding of the sensory experiences of the transgender and gender diverse population. Targeting integration of these centrally-mediated phantom genital sensations with the peripherally generated sensation from genital stimulation may represent one potential avenue to improve sensation and embodiment following genital gender-affirming surgical procedures. Additionally, emerging techniques in modern peripheral nerve surgery targeting phantom pain may offer potential treatment options for painful phantom sensation seen after cases of genital surgery or trauma.

[Medical-surgical complications and their impact on patients' return to work whilst follow-up major lower-limb amputations in Hospital del Trabajador in Santiago (HTS)]. / Complicaciones médico-quirúrgicas y su impacto en el retorno laboral durante el seguimiento de pacientes con amputación mayor de extremidades inferiores en el Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago (HTS).

INTRODUCTION: The presence of different complications whilst follow-up amputee patients reaches 10-80%. The main objective of this research is to assess the impact of these in the return-to-work of lower-limb traumatic amputation cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort research was carried out. Clinic-demographic variables information was recollected in order to assess its linkage to different medical-surgical complications and functional outcomes. Survival curves were created to evaluate the return-to-work of patients with and without complications. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients, on average aged 45.7 years old (91.3% men, 71.7% without comorbidities), were included on this research. The most frequent level of amputation was transtibial (65.2%). Residual limb pain, phantom pain, dermatological-infectious complications and painful neuroma were registered in 80.4%, 58.7%, 50% y 30.4% of the cases respectively. Half of the patients had returned to their workplace after 2years of post-surgical follow-up. The return-to-work rates were significantly lower in patients suffering from residual limb pain (p=0.0083) and from painful neuroma (p=0.0051). CONCLUSION: Complications are frequent during traumatic-amputee patients' follow-up and, some of them, may impact on the return-to-work rate.

The effectiveness of targeted muscle reinnervation in reducing pain and improving quality of life for patients following lower limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Globally, over 1 million lower limb amputations are performed annually, with approximately 75% of patients experiencing significant pain, profoundly impacting their quality of life and functional capabilities. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has emerged as a surgical solution involving the rerouting of amputated nerves to specific muscle targets. Originally introduced to enhance signal amplification for myoelectric prosthesis control, TMR has expanded its applications to include neuroma management and pain relief. However, the literature assessing patient outcomes is lacking, specifically for lower limb amputees. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of TMR in reducing pain and enhancing functional outcomes for patients who have undergone lower limb amputation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by examining relevant studies between 2010 and 2023, focusing on pain reduction, functional outcomes and patient-reported quality of life measures. RESULTS: In total, 20 studies were eligible encompassing a total of 778 extremities, of which 75.06% (n = 584) were lower limb amputees. Average age was 46.66 years and patients were predominantly male (n = 70.67%). Seven studies (35%) reported functional outcomes. Patients who underwent primary TMR exhibited lower average patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) scores for phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). Secondary TMR led to improvements in PLP, RLP and general limb pain as indicated by average numeric rating scale and PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: The systematic review underscores TMR's potential benefits in alleviating pain, fostering post-amputation rehabilitation and enhancing overall well-being for lower limb amputees.

Phantom Limb Pain and Painful Neuroma After Dysvascular Lower-Extremity Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) and symptomatic neuroma can be debilitating and significantly impact the quality of life of amputees. However, the prevalence of PLP and symptomatic neuromas in patients following dysvascular lower limb amputation (LLA) has not been reliably established. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain and symptomatic neuroma after dysvascular LLA. METHODS: Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science) were searched on October 5th, 2022. Prospective or retrospective observational cohort studies or cross-sectional studies reporting either the prevalence or incidence of phantom limb pain and/or symptomatic neuroma following dysvascular LLA were identified. Two reviewers independently conducted the screening, data extraction, and the risk of bias assessment according to the PRISMA guidelines. To estimate the prevalence of phantom limb pain, a meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in the quantitative analysis, including 1924 amputees. A meta-analysis demonstrated that 69% of patients after dysvascular LLA experience phantom limb pain (95% CI 53-86%). The reported pain intensity on a scale from 0-10 in LLA patients ranged between 2.3 ± 1.4 and 5.5 ± .7. A single study reported an incidence of symptomatic neuroma following dysvascular LLA of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates the high prevalence of phantom limb pain after dysvascular LLA. Given the often prolonged and disabling nature of neuropathic pain and the difficulties managing it, more consideration needs to be given to strategies to prevent it at the time of amputation.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective technique for the prevention and management of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) among amputees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptomatic neuroma recurrence and neuropathic pain outcomes between cohorts undergoing TMR at the time of amputation (ie, acute) versus TMR following symptomatic neuroma formation (ie, delayed). METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review was conducted using patients undergoing TMR between 2015 and 2020. Symptomatic neuroma recurrence and surgical complications were collected. A subanalysis was conducted for patients who completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, interference, and behavior scales and an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) form. RESULTS: A total of 105 limbs from 103 patients were identified, with 73 acute TMR limbs and 32 delayed TMR limbs. Nineteen percent of the delayed TMR group had symptomatic neuromas recur in the distribution of original TMR compared with 1% of the acute TMR group ( P < 0.05). Pain surveys were completed at final follow-up by 85% of patients in the acute TMR group and 69% of patients in the delayed TMR group. Of this subanalysis, acute TMR patients reported significantly lower PLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05), RLP PROMIS pain intensity ( P < 0.05), and RLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05) scores in comparison to the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent acute TMR reported improved pain scores and a decreased rate of neuroma formation compared with TMR performed in a delayed fashion. These results highlight the promising role of TMR in the prevention of neuropathic pain and neuroma formation at the time of amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Chronic post amputation pain: pathophysiology and prevention options for a heterogenous phenomenon.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic postamputation pain (cPAP) remains a clinical challenge, and current understanding places a high emphasis on prevention strategies. Unfortunately, there is still no evidence-based regimen to reliably prevent chronic pain after amputation. RECENT FINDINGS: Risk factors for the development of phantom limb pain have been proposed. Analgesic preventive interventions are numerous and no silver bullet has been found. Novel techniques such as neuromodulation and cryoablation have been proposed. Surgical techniques focusing on reimplantation of the injured nerve might reduce the incidence of phantom limb pain after surgery. SUMMARY: Phantom limb pain is a multifactorial process involving profound functional and structural changes in the peripheral and central nervous system. These changes interact with individual medical, psychosocial and genetic patient risk factors. The patient collective of amputees is very heterogeneous. Available evidence suggests that efforts should focus on prevention of phantom limb pain, since treatment is notoriously difficult. Questions as yet unanswered include the evidence-base of specific analgesic interventions, their optimal "window of opportunity" where they may be most effective, and whether patient stratification according to biopsychosocial risk factors can help guide preventive therapy.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in managing post-amputation related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Limb amputation can cause residual limb pain (RLP) and/or phantom limb pain (PLP). Although targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was initially introduced to facilitate the control of prosthetic limbs, it has been noted that these patients experience less pain and improved prosthetic functional outcomes. As a result, the use of TMR in managing neuroma-related RLP is increasing. The aim of this review is to assess the quality and strength of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of TMR in managing amputation-related pain. METHODS: Five different databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched from inception to March 2022. The protocol for this systematic review has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020218242). To be included, studies needed to compare pre- and postoperative pain outcomes or different techniques for adult patients who underwent TMR following amputation. Eligible studies also needed to use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and be clinical trials or observational studies published in English. Excluded studies were case reports, case series, reviews, proof of concept studies, and conference proceedings. A meta-analysis was performed on studies that had similar intervention and control groups to examine treatment effects using a random-effects model. Studies were weighted using the inverse variance method, and a statistically significant p-value was considered to be less than or equal to 0.05. RESULTS: This review included five studies for qualitative analysis and four studies for quantitative analysis. Reviewed studies enrolled a total of 127 patients. The TMR group was compared with standard treatment at 12 months follow-up. The TMR group showed significantly better PLP as assessed by the numerical rating score RLP, and PLP assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) also showed significantly lower pain intensity in the TMR group. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence of good quality favoring TMR in reducing postamputation PLP and RLP pain compared with standard care. Randomized clinical trials are encouraged to compare the efficacy of different surgical techniques.

Surgical treatments for postamputation pain: study protocol for an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Painful conditions such as residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) can manifest after amputation. The mechanisms underlying such postamputation pains are diverse and should be addressed accordingly. Different surgical treatment methods have shown potential for alleviating RLP due to neuroma formation - commonly known as neuroma pain - and to a lesser degree PLP. Two reconstructive surgical interventions, namely targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), are gaining popularity in postamputation pain treatment with promising results. However, these two methods have not been directly compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Here, we present a study protocol for an international, double-blind, RCT to assess the effectiveness of TMR, RPNI, and a non-reconstructive procedure called neuroma transposition (active control) in alleviating RLP, neuroma pain, and PLP. METHODS: One hundred ten upper and lower limb amputees suffering from RLP will be recruited and assigned randomly to one of the surgical interventions (TMR, RPNI, or neuroma transposition) in an equal allocation ratio. Complete evaluations will be performed during a baseline period prior to the surgical intervention, and follow-ups will be conducted in short term (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery) and in long term (2 and 4 years post-surgery). After the 12-month follow-up, the study will be unblinded for the evaluator and the participants. If the participant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the treatment at that time, further treatment including one of the other procedures will be discussed in consultation with the clinical investigator at that site. DISCUSSION: A double-blind RCT is necessary for the establishment of evidence-based procedures, hence the motivation for this work. In addition, studies on pain are challenging due to the subjectivity of the experience and the lack of objective evaluation methods. Here, we mitigate this problem by including different pain evaluation methods known to have clinical relevance. We plan to analyse the primary variable, mean change in NRS (0-10) between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach to minimise bias and keep the advantage of randomisation. The secondary outcomes will be analysed on both ITT and per-protocol (PP). An adherence protocol (PP population) analysis will be used for estimating a more realistic effect of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov NCT05009394.

Targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for pain prophylaxis and treatment: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Nerve pain frequently develops following amputations and peripheral nerve injuries. Two innovative surgical techniques, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI), are rapidly gaining popularity as alternatives to traditional nerve management, but their effectiveness is unclear. LITERATURE SURVEY: A review of literature pertaining to TMR and RPNI pain results was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases were queried. METHODOLOGY: Studies were included if pain outcomes were assessed after TMR or RPNI in the upper or lower extremity, both for prophylaxis performed at the time of amputation and for treatment of postamputation pain. Data were extracted for evaluation. SYNTHESIS: Seventeen studies were included, with 14 evaluating TMR (366 patients) and three evaluating RPNI (75 patients). Of these, one study was a randomized controlled trial. Nine studies had a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year (range 4-27.6 months). For pain treatment, TMR and RPNI improved neuroma pain in 75%-100% of patients and phantom limb pain in 45%-80% of patients, averaging a 2.4-6.2-point reduction in pain scores on the numeric rating scale postoperatively. When TMR or RPNI was performed prophylactically, many patients reported no neuroma pain (48%-100%) or phantom limb pain (45%-87%) at time of follow-up. Six TMR studies reported Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores assessing pain intensity, behavior, and interference, which consistently showed a benefit for all measures. Complication rates ranged from 13% to 31%, most frequently delayed wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: Both TMR and RPNI may be beneficial for preventing and treating pain originating from peripheral nerve dysfunction compared to traditional techniques. Randomized trials with longer term follow-up are needed to directly compare the effectiveness of TMR and RPNI with traditional nerve management techniques.

Effect of a continuous perineural levobupivacaine infusion on pain after major lower limb amputation: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Randomised controlled trial of the effect of a perineural infusion of levobupivacaine on moderate/severe phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation. SETTING: Single-centre, UK university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety patients undergoing above-knee and below-knee amputation for chronic limb threatening ischaemia under general anaesthesia. Exclusion criteria were patients having surgery under neuraxial anaesthesia; inability to operate a patient-controlled analgesia device or complete a Visual Analogue Scale; amputation for trauma or malignancy; or contraindication to levobupivacaine. INTERVENTIONS: Either levobupivacaine 0.125% or saline 0.9% (10 mL bolus, infusion of 8 mL/hour for 96 hours) via a sciatic or posterior tibial nerve sheath catheter placed under direct vision during surgery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the presence of phantom limb pain, residual limb pain and phantom limb sensations up to 6 months after amputation. Secondary outcome measures included early postoperative pain and morphine requirements after surgery. RESULTS: Data from 81 participants were analysed; 6-month follow-up data were available for 62 patients. Pain and morphine requirements varied widely before and after amputation in both groups. The incidences of moderate/severe phantom limb pain, residual limb pain and phantom limb sensations were low from 6 weeks with no significant differences between groups in phantom limb pain at rest (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.14, p=0.394) or movement (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.21, p=0.425) at 6 months. Early postoperative pain scores were low in both groups with no between-group differences in residual limb pain or phantom limb sensations (rest or movement) at any time point. High postoperative morphine consumption was associated with worsening phantom limb pain both at rest (-17.51, 95% CI -24.29 to -10.74; p<0.001) and on movement (-18.54, 95% CI -25.58 to -11.49; p<0.001). The incidence of adverse effects related to the study was low in both groups: postoperative nausea, vomiting and sedation scores were similar, and there were no features of local anaesthetic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term phantom limb pain, residual limb pain and phantom limb sensations were not reduced significantly by perineural infusion of levobupivacaine, although the study was underpowered to show significant differences in the primary outcome. The incidence of phantom limb pain was lower than previously reported, possibly attributable to frequent assessment and early intervention to identify and treat postoperative pain when it occurred. There were large variations in postoperative pain scores, high requirements for analgesics before and after surgery and some problems maintaining recruitment and long -term follow-up. Knowledge of these potential problems should inform future research in this group of patients. Further work should investigate the association between perioperative morphine requirements and late phantom limb pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2007-000619-27; ISRCTN68691928.

Variation on a technique for the intra-muscular insertion of nerve endings to minimise neuropathic and residual pain in lower limb amputees: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: A major cause of morbidity in lower limb amputees is phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). This study aimed to determine whether a variation of the surgical technique of inserting nerve endings into adjacent muscle bellies at the time of lower limb amputation can decrease the incidence and severity of PLP and RLP. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to January 2021, including eight patients that underwent nerve insertion (NI) and 36 that received standard treatment. Primary outcomes included the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, behaviour, and interference. Secondary outcome included Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function assessing mobility. Cumulative scores were transformed to standardised t scores. RESULTS: Across all primary and secondary outcomes, NI patients had lower PLP and RLP. Mean 'worst pain' score was 3.5 out of 10 for PLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.89 in the control cohort (p = 0.298), and 2.6 out of 10 for RLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.44 in the control cohort (p = 0.035). Mean 'best pain' and 'current pain' scores were also superior in the NI cohort for PLP (p = 0.003, p = 0.022), and RLP (p = 0.018, p = 0.134). Mean PROMIS t scores were lower for the NI cohort for RLP (40.1 vs 49.4 for pain intensity; p = 0.014, 44.4 vs 48.2 for pain interference; p = 0.085, 42.5 vs 49.9 for pain behaviour; p = 0.025). Mean PROMIS t scores were also lower for the NI cohort for PLP (42.5 vs 52.7 for pain intensity; p = 0.018); 45.0 vs 51.5 for pain interference; p = 0.015, 46.3 vs 51.1 for pain behaviour; p = 0.569). Mean Neuro-QoL t score was lower in NI cohort (45.4 vs 41.9; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Surgical insertion of nerve endings into adjacent muscle bellies during lower limb amputation is a simple yet effective way of minimising PLP and RLP, improving patients' subsequent quality of life. Additional comparisons with targeted muscle reinnervation should be performed to determine the optimal treatment option.

Targeted muscle reinnervation: a brief history of a promising procedure for effective management of amputation pain.

Each year, 27.5% of the 150 000 people in the United States who require lower extremity amputation experience significant postoperative complications, including pain, infection, and need for reoperation. Postamputation pain, including RLP and PLP, is debilitating. While the causes of such pain remain unknown, neuroma formation following sensory nerve transection is believed to be a major contributor. Various techniques exist for management of a symptomatic neuroma, but few data exist on which technique is superior. Furthermore, there are few data on primary prevention of neuroma formation following injury or intentional transection. The TMR technique shows promise for both management of PLP and RLP and prevention of neuroma formation. Following amputation, transected sensory nerves are coapted to nearby motor nerve supplying remaining extremity musculature. Not only does this procedure generate increased myoelectric signals for improved prosthesis control, TMR appears to neurophysiologically alter sensory nerves, preventing formation of painful sensory neuromas. The sole RCT to date evaluating the efficacy of TMR showed statistically significant reduction in PLP. TMR is not limited to use in the setting of major limb amputation. It has also been used in the setting of post-mastectomy pain, abdominal wall neuromas, digital amputations, and headache surgeries. This article reviews the origin of TMR and provides a brief description of histologic changes following the procedure, as well as current data regarding the efficacy of TMR with regard to postoperative pain relief. It also seeks to provide a concise, comprehensive resource for providers to facilitate better discussions with patients about treatment options.

Factors Related to Neuropathic Pain following Lower Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity amputations are common, and postoperative neuropathic pain (phantom limb pain or symptomatic neuroma) is frequently reported. The use of active treatment of the nerve end has been shown to reduce pain but requires additional resources and should therefore be performed primarily in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the development of neuropathic pain following above-the-knee amputation, knee disarticulation, or below-the-knee amputation. METHODS: Retrospectively, 1565 patients with an average follow-up of 4.3 years who underwent a primary above-the-knee amputation, knee disarticulation, or below-the-knee amputation were identified. Amputation levels for above-the-knee amputations and knee disarticulations were combined as proximal amputation level, with below-the-knee amputations being performed in 61 percent of patients. The primary outcome was neuropathic pain (i.e., phantom limb pain or symptomatic neuroma) based on medical chart review. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors associated with neuropathic pain. RESULTS: Postoperative neuropathic pain was present in 584 patients (37 percent), with phantom limb pain occurring in 34 percent of patients and symptomatic neuromas occurring in 3.8 percent of patients. Proximal amputation level, normal creatinine levels, and a history of psychiatric disease were associated with neuropathic pain. Diabetes, hypothyroidism, and older age were associated with lower odds of developing neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropathic pain following lower extremity amputation is common. Factors influencing nerve regeneration, either increasing (proximal amputations and younger age) or decreasing (diabetes, hypothyroidism, and chronic kidney disease) it, play a role in the development of postamputation neuropathic pain. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

The recurrence of phantom limb pain with spinal anesthesia.

The recurrence or exacerbation of phantom limb pain (PLP) induced by spinal anesthesia in patients with amputated limbs is rare, but it can occur in any amputee. A 76-year-old woman with an amputated right knee underwent three left knee surgeries with spinal anesthesia over a period of 6 months. She did not experience PLP in the previous two surgeries but experienced the recurrence of severe PLP after the third surgery for the left knee amputation. It is believed that this third operation caused the patient to experience even more severe psychological stress than the previous two operations. Regional blocks can induce PLP in amputees. In addition, PLP can be triggered and exacerbated by psychological factors. Therefore, we suggest that physicians check the patient's psychological state and provide adequate mental stability when performing surgeries with spinal anesthesia in amputated patients.

Estimating the Impact of Postamputation Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuromas, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain commonly occur after lower-extremity amputations; however, incidence of these issues is poorly reported and understood. Present literature is limited to small cohort studies of amputees, and the reported incidence of chronic pain after amputation ranges as widely as 0% to 80%. We sought to objectively investigate the incidence of postamputation pain and nerve-related complications after lower-extremity amputation. METHODS: Patients who underwent lower-extremity amputation between 2007 and 2017 were identified using a national insurance-based claims database. Incidence of reporting of postoperative neuroma, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain were identified. Patient demographics and comorbidities were assessed. Average costs of treatment were determined in the year after lower-extremity amputation. Logistic regression analyses and resulting odds ratios were calculated to determine statistically significant increases in incidence of postamputation nerve-related pain complications in the setting of demographic factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: There were 29,507 lower amputations identified. Postoperative neuralgia occurred in 4.4% of all amputations, neuromas in 0.4%, and phantom limb pain in 10.9%. Nerve-related pain complications were most common in through knee amputations (20.3%) and below knee amputations (16.7%). Male sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 3, diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic angiopathy, diabetic retinopathy, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and tobacco abuse were associated with statistically significant increases in incidence of 1-year nerve-related pain or phantom limb pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the incidence of these complications after operative extremity amputations and associated increased treatment costs, future research regarding their pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention would be beneficial to both patients and providers.

Peripheral Nerve Management in Extremity Amputations.

The effective management of peripheral nerves in amputation surgery is critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Nerve-related pain after amputation is common, maybe a source of dissatisfaction and functional impairment, and should be considered in all amputees presenting with pain and dysfunction. While traction neurectomy or transposition has long been the standard of care, both regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) have emerged as promising techniques to improve neuroma-related and phantom pain. A multi-disciplinary and multi-modal approach is essential for the optimal management of amputees both acutely and in the delayed or chronic setting.

Complex regional pain syndrome patient treated with a below knee amputation, implanting nerves directly into muscle: A case report.

Persistent, disabling lower extremity pain, outside the distribution of a single nerve, is termed chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), but, in reality, this chronic pain is often due to multiple peripheral nerve injuries. It is the purpose of this report to describe the first application of the "traditional," nerve implantation into muscle, usually used in the treatment of a painful neuroma, as a pre-emptive surgical technique in doing a below knee amputation (BKA). In 2011, a 51-year-old woman developed severe, disabling CRPS, after a series of operations to treat an enchondroma of the left fifth metatarsal. When appropriate peripheral nerve surgeries failed to relieve distal pain, a BKA was elected. The approach to the BKA included implantation of each transected peripheral nerve directly into an adjacent muscle. At 5.0 years after the patient's BKA, the woman reported full use of this extremity, using the prosthesis, and was free of phantom limb and residual limb pain. This anecdotal experience gives insight that long-term relief of lower extremity CRPS can be achieved by a traditional BKA utilizing the approach of implanting each transected nerve into an adjacent muscle.

Incidence and Nerve Distribution of Symptomatic Neuromas and Phantom Limb Pain after Below-Knee Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with major lower limb amputations suffer from symptomatic neuromas and phantom-limb pain due to their transected nerves. Peripheral nerve surgery techniques, such as targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interface, aim to physiologically prevent this nerve-specific pain. No studies have specifically reported on which nerves most frequently cause chronic pain. The authors studied the nerve-specific incidence of symptomatic neuroma formation and phantom limb pain in patients undergoing a below-knee amputation, to better tailor use of targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interface. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing a below-knee amputation from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018, at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. All below-knee amputations were performed with a posterior skin flap, myotenodesis, and traction neurectomies of all nerves. Postoperative notes were reviewed for the presence of a symptomatic neuroma, defined as localized pain and a Tinel sign over a known sensory nerve, and nerve-specific phantom limb pain, defined as pain of the missing limb corresponding to a known dermatome. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this study. The rate of symptomatic neuroma formation was 14.6 percent (29 of 198), with the superficial peroneal and saphenous nerves most often involved. Diabetes and obesity were protective against symptomatic neuroma formation. The rate of nerve-specific phantom limb pain was 12.6 percent (25 of 198) and highly correlated with the presence of a symptomatic neuroma. CONCLUSION: To optimize outcomes for amputees, it is critical that surgeons best understand what nerves are more likely to form symptomatic neuromas and lead to nerve-specific phantom limb pain, so that surgeons can best tailor primary or secondary management of the major sensory nerves. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

A consecutive series of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) cases for relief of neuroma and phantom limb pain: UK perspective.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) can improve symptoms of neuroma pain (NP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) in patients. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to measure changes in NP and PLP levels following TMR surgery at 4-time points (baseline, 3, 6- and 12-months postoperatively). Secondary aims included identification of the character and rate of any surgical complications and patients' satisfaction with TMR. METHODS: A retrospective review of outcomes of 36 patients who underwent TMR surgery to treat intractable NP and/or PLP after major amputation of an upper (UL) or lower limb (LL) at a single centre in London, UK over 7 years. The surgical techniques, complications, and satisfaction with TMR are described. RESULTS: Forty TMR procedures were performed on 36 patients. Thirty patients had complete data for NP and PLP levels at all pre-defined time points. Significant improvements (p<0.01) in both types of pain were observed for both upper and LL amputees. However, there were varying patterns of recovery. For example, UL amputees experienced worsening of PLP in the first few months post-operatively whereas surgical complications were more common in LL cases. Patients were overwhelmingly satisfied with the improvements in their symptoms (90%). CONCLUSIONS: TMR surgery appeared to relieve both NP and PLP although the retrospective nature of this study limits the strength of this conclusion. However, complication rates were high, and it is crucial for surgeons and patients to fully understand the course and outcomes of this novel surgery prior to undertaking treatment.