Continuation of Newly Initiated Midodrine Therapy After Intensive Care and Hospital Discharge: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: Midodrine is an α1-agonist approved for orthostatic hypotension. Recently, it has received attention as an oral vasopressor to facilitate ICU discharge. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of continuation of newly initiated midodrine upon ICU and hospital discharge and identify risk factors associated with its occurrence. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. SETTING: ICU patients from January 2011 to October 2016 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to any ICU who received new midodrine for hypotension and survived to discharge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 1,010 patients were newly started on midodrine and survived to ICU discharge. Midodrine was continued in 67% (672/1,010) of patients at ICU discharge. Admission to cardiovascular surgery ICU and mixed medical/surgical ICU was a risk factor for midodrine continuation at ICU discharge (odds ratio, 3.94 [2.50-6.21] and 2.03 [1.29-3.20], respectively). At hospital discharge, 34% (311/909) of patients were continued on midodrine therapy. History of congestive heart failure predicted midodrine continuation at hospital discharge (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.05-2.12]). Hypertension and use of mechanical ventilation were associated with a decreased odds of midodrine prescription at both ICU and hospital discharge. Of those discharged from the ICU or hospital on midodrine, 50% were concomitantly prescribed antihypertensives. Discharge from the ICU on midodrine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (7.5 ± 8.9 vs 10.6 ± 13.4 d) and reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.70]; p < 0.001), despite no difference in baseline severity of illness scores. In contrast, patients discharged from the hospital on midodrine had a higher risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.26-2.04]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study established a high prevalence of midodrine continuation in transitions of care. The risks and benefits of this practice remain unclear. Future studies should explore the impact of this practice on patient outcomes and resource utilization. These insights could be used to model interventions for proper tapering, discontinuation, or follow-up of new start midodrine.

Oral Midodrine Hydrochloride for Prevention of Orthostatic Hypotension during Early Mobilization after Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative mobilization is essential for rapid recovery but may be impaired by orthostatic intolerance (OI) and orthostatic hypotension (OH), which are highly prevalent after major surgery. Pathogenic mechanisms include an insufficient postoperative vasopressor response. The oral α-1 agonist midodrine hydrochloride increases vascular resistance, and the authors hypothesized that midodrine would reduce the prevalence of OH during mobilization 6 h after total hip arthroplasty relative to placebo. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized trial allocated 120 patients 18 yr or older and scheduled for total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia to either 5 mg midodrine hydrochloride or placebo orally 1 h before mobilization at 6 and 24 h postoperatively. The primary outcome was the prevalence of OH (decrease in systolic or diastolic arterial pressures of > 20 or 10 mmHg, respectively) during mobilization 6 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were OI and hemodynamic responses to mobilization at 6 and 24 h. RESULTS: At 6 h, 14 (25%; 95% CI, 14 to 38%) versus 23 (39.7%; 95% CI, 27 to 53%) patients had OH in the midodrine and placebo group, respectively, relative risk 0.63 (0.36 to 1.10; P = 0.095), whereas OI was present in 15 (25.0%; 15 to 38%) versus 22 (37.3%; 25 to 51%) patients, relative risk 0.68 (0.39 to 1.18; P = 0.165). At 24 h, OI and OH prevalence did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive use of oral 5 mg midodrine did not significantly reduce the prevalence of OH during early postoperative mobilization compared with placebo. However, further studies on dose and timing are warranted since midodrine is effective in chronic OH conditions.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of midodrine on blood pressure, the autonomic nervous system, and plasma natriuretic peptides: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-period, crossover, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Midodrine is an alpha-agonist prodrug of desglymidodrine (DGM) that has been reported to be of clinical benefit in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope. Its effects may be mediated not only by its hypertensive properties but also by its neurohumoral influences independent of blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to simultaneously characterize the effects of midodrine on BP, plasma catecholamines, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and power spectral analysis of heart rate (HR) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, 2-period, crossover study in which a single, oral, 5-mg dose of midodrine was compared with placebo. The washout period between midodrine and placebo was 1 week. The study parameters included plasma DGM (as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]); systolic and diastolic BP (as measured with an oscillometric monitor); HR; plasma catecholamines (measured by HPLC); plasma ANP, also known as venous return (measured by a radio-immunoassay); and low- and high-frequency HR variation (calculated from computerized 5-minute electrocardiographic recordings). All study parameters were measured simultaneously 12 times just before and over a period of 8 hours after drug administration. RESULTS: Fifteen healthy nonsmoking male subjects (14 white, 1 black; mean [SD] age, 28.6 [4.7] years; weight, 74.5 [16.4] kg; seated BP, 109.9 [9.0]/73.6 [9.5] mm Hg; seated HR, 63.8 [8.4] bpm) were randomized. No significant effects of midodrine on BP were observed. At Cmax, midodrine decreased norepinephrine from 188.4 (30.6) to 162.5 (29.8) pg/mL (P = 0.011) and HR from 57.2 (7.3) to 54.9 (6.6) bpm (P = 0.022). A significant correlation was found between DGM concentration and HR ( varphi -0.61; P = 0.014). A DGM-related increase in plasma ANP (+29.6 [90.0] fmoL/mL) was observed. CONCLUSION: This study in healthy male volunteers found that midodrine has sympatholytic influences that are independent of BP but related to augmented venous return.

[Successful midodrin treatment for vasovagal syncopes accompanied by asystole]. / Uspechnoe lechenie midodrinom vazovagal'nykh obmorokov, protekaiushchikh s asistoliei.

Vasovagal syncopes (WS) are fainting fits whose manifestations are systemic vasodilation and bradycardia. The development of WS is frequently accompanied by short-term cardiac arrest. Recent data show that implantation of a cardiac pacemaker fails to prevent the development of fainting fits in these patients. On the basis of the pathogenesis of WS, the use of alpha-adrenomimetic midodrine is justifiable. The presented case demonstrates the successful use of the agent in the treatment of vasovagal syncope accompanied by asystole.

Uso de midodrín y congelación de semen en el tratamiento de las alteraciones del transporte espermático: caso clínico / Use of midodrine and frozen/thawed semen to treat semen transport disturbances: report of 2 cases

Retrograde ejaculation severely compromises male fertility. The use of sympathicomimetics for the treatment of this condition has poor results, except in patients with partial retrograde ejaculation, whose semen has a higher spermatozoa concentration. The semen of two patients with partial retrograde ejaculation was collected and frozen after the injection of a sympathicomimetic (Midodrine). The frozen/thawed samples were mixed with fresh semen recently ejaculated to obtain a minimal number of motile spermatozoa, and used for intrauterine insemination (> de 1 x 106 motile spermatozoa/ml). In both cases, pregnancies that developed satisfactorily, were obtained

Midodrine hydrochloride in the treatment of vasovagal syncope.

Therapy of vasovagal syncope is still a subject of debate. Various pharmacotherapies were proposed. However, they are often not tolerated or ineffective. The purpose of this prospective, nonrandomized study was to evaluate the usefulness of alpha-agonist midodrine hydrochloride in the treatment of vasovagal syncope. Forty-one patients (mean age 34 years, 18 men) with history of recurrent syncope and positivity of head-up tilt testing were included (28 patients with type 1, 10 patients with type 2, 3 patients with type 3 according to VASIS classification). In all patients oral therapy with midodrine was started. Initial dose was 2.5 mg two times daily. When necessary, the dose was increased to 5 mg two times daily. Efficacy of treatment was assessed by repeated head-up tilt testing after 1-2 weeks of therapy and by long-term follow-up. After midodrine hydrochloride treatment, 39 of 41 patients (95%) had no inducible presyncope or syncope on repeated tilt table testing. Effective dose was 2.5 mg two times daily in 25 patients and 5 mg two times daily in 16 patients. During a mean follow-up period 19+/-9 months, 38 of 39 patients (97%) with negative repeated tilt table test remained free of syncope recurrence.

Efficacy of midodrine hydrochloride in neurocardiogenic syncope refractory to standard therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients with neurocardiogenic syncope continue to have recurrent syncope or presyncope despite the use of currently available drug therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether midodrine hydrochloride, a selective adrenergic agonist, could be effective in patients resistant to, or intolerant of, currently used medications in the treatment of neurocardiogenic syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients with a history of recurrent syncope or presyncope in whom hypotension with syncope or presyncope could be provoked during head-up tilt testing were included. There were 4 men and 7 women with a mean age (+/-SD) age of 34 +/- 13 years. In all patients, standard therapy with beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents, ephedrine, theophylline, disopyramide, fludrocortisone, and sertraline hydrochloride, was either ineffective, poorly tolerated, or contraindicated. Midodrine was initially administered orally at a dose of 2.5 mg three times daily. After adjustment of dosage over 2 to 4 weeks, patients were followed-up clinically. Midodrine was discontinued in one patient because of side effects. Frequency of syncope or presyncope during the 3 months prior to starting treatment was compared during a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 4 weeks after starting treatment with midodrine. There was significant (P < 0.01) reduction in syncopal and presyncopal episodes on midodrine. Five patients had complete resolution of symptoms, while four patients had significant improvement. Symptoms did not improve in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine hydrochloride can be effective in preventing recurrent symptoms in selected patients with neurocardiogenic syncope unresponsive to, or intolerant of, standard drug therapy.

[Retrograde ejaculation from the urologic viewpoint and the current status of therapeutic possibilities]. / Die retrograde Ejakulation aus urologischer Sicht und der gegenwärtige Stand der therapeutischen Möglichkeiten.

The successful treatment of ejaculatory disturbances is an unresolved problem even today, especially in the patient group of young men after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection because of testicular cancer. A promising therapeutic measure is the treatment with alpha-sympathicomimetics as Pryleugan and Gutron. Pryleugan is recommended as a first- line treatment, whereas Gutron is indicated after failure of this initial therapy. After unsuccessful medical treatment a procedure of sperm production, conservation and insemination is presented. A close cooperation between urologists and gynecologists is necessary for higher therapeutic success rates in ejaculatory disturbances.