Percutaneous retrieval of an embolized Watchman device on a papillary muscle in the left ventricle.

The use of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices have gained prominence as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke and high risk of bleeding. While these devices have shown efficacy in reducing stroke risk, there have been reported cases of embolization of the Watchman device. There are very few cases of successful percutaneous retrieval of embolized Watchman devices from the left ventricle (LV), as many of these cases require open heart surgery for safe removal. We are presenting a case of an 80-year-old male whose Watchman device embolized to the LV and was entrapped on the LV papillary muscle that was then successfully retrieved via percutaneous methods, which shows the percutaneous options remain a viable strategy to retrieve LAAO devices from the LV.

A Novel Microsnare and Microwire Coil Retrieval Technique.

Coil migration during endovascular embolization is a complication that can result in thromboembolic occlusion leading to potentially large infarcts if not removed. Microsnares are commonly used to remove migrated coils. Current techniques, however, struggle in cases where the microsnare is unable to loop over and secure a free end of the coil. We present a case in which a microsnare combined with a microwire successfully removed a migrated coil in a patient with a bleeding hepatic pseudoaneurysm post-embolization. This technique proved beneficial when traditional methods were insufficient, especially in small vessels or coil packs that cannot be snared. The synergy of the microsnare and microwire technique presents a promising solution for challenging migrated coil retrievals.

A review of the incidence, outcome, and management of venous stent migration.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovenous stenting has emerged during the past decade as the primary method of treating symptomatic venous outflow obstruction. A recognized complication of venous stenting is stent migration. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify the number of cases of stent migration in reported studies to recognize the risk factors that might be associated with this complication and the outcomes following migration. METHODS: A review was conducted in accordance with the MOOSE (meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology) and PRIMSA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Key references were searched using specified keywords. All relevant data for the primary procedure and subsequent presentation with stent migration were retrieved. The data were assessed as too low in quality to allow for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2020, 31 studies were identified, including 29 case reports and 2 case series, providing data for 54 events of venous stent migration with some data provided regarding the stent used for 47 of the events. The mean age of the 52 patients with stent migration was 50 years (range, 19-88 years) and 30 were men (57.6%). The stents for most of the reported cases were ≤60 mm in length (38 of 46; 82.6%). Only three of the reports were of stents >14 mm in diameter (3 of 47; 3.6%). None of the studies had reported migration of stents >100 mm long. In 85% of the migrated stent events, retrieval was attempted, with 65.2% via an endovascular approach. The immediate outcome was satisfactory for 100% of the reported attempts, whether by an endovascular or open surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our literature review suggest that the risk of migration is rare but might be underreported. Most of reported cases had occurred with shorter and smaller diameter stents. The paucity of reported data and the short-term follow-up provided suggest that more formal data collection would provide a truer reflection of the incidence. However, clear strategies to avoid migration should be followed to prevent this complication from occurring.

ANTERIOR MIGRATION OF INTRAVITREAL FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANTS: A CASE REPORT.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To describe management of anterior migration of a fluocinolone acetonide(FAc) intravitreal implant. METHODS: A retrospective case report. A 61-year-old man with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy had anterior migration of a FAc implant. Anterior segment photos and optical coherence tomography were performed. RESULTS: Approximately 3 months after FAc implant was administered, it was noted to have migrated into the anterior chamber. Vision, intraocular pressure, and optical coherence tomography imaging initially remained stable, and no evidence of detectable corneal edema developed in 30 months of follow-up. However, at 36 months of follow-up, after second FAc implant injection, mild corneal edema developed,suspected to be related to the migrating implants. CONCLUSION: Anterior migration of a FAc implant may lead to less rapid and severe corneal decompensation compared with other steroid implants. Despite this, delayed corneal edema may occur. Careful monitoring of the cornea and intraocular pressure is recommended in cases of anterior FAc migration.

Migração para veia hepática de cateter totalmente implantável para quimioterapia em paciente com carcinoma de mama: relato de caso / Hepatic vein migration of a totally implantable venous access port-a-cath for chemotherapy in a breast carcinoma patient: case report

Resumo O cateter totalmente implantável (CTI) é utilizado na administração da quimioterapia. Em menos de 1% dos casos de complicação, pode ocorrer migração do CTI para quimioterapia para a circulação sistêmica. O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever um caso de migração do CTI para a veia hepática. Uma paciente do sexo feminino, de 44 anos de idade, teve diagnóstico de câncer de mama com indicação de quimioterapia neoadjuvante. Realizou-se a implantação de cateter port-a-cath. Durante o procedimento de punção do cateter, houve retorno normal de sangue, e foi realizada infusão de soro fisiológico. Em seguida, houve um aumento de volume no local do port e não retorno de sangue à aspiração. A radiografia de tórax mostrou embolização do cateter em topografia hepática. Retirou-se o cateter pela técnica do laço (sem complicações), e a paciente recebeu alta no dia seguinte. Possíveis alterações no funcionamento do CTI devem chamar atenção da equipe responsável.

Abstract A totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is used for chemotherapy administration. Venous port migration to the systemic circulation occurs in less than 1% of complications. The aim of this study is to describe a case of TIVAP migration to the hepatic vein. A 44-year-old female patient with breast cancer was prescribed neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A port-a-cath was surgically implanted for chemotherapy. During the port puncture procedure, blood returned normally when aspirated. When the port was first accessed and flushed with saline solution, swelling was observed at the port site and blood could no longer be aspirated. A chest radiography showed catheter embolization in the region of the hepatic vein. The catheter was retrieved using a snare technique (without complications) and the patient was discharged the next day. The care team should be alert to possible TIIVAP malfunction.

Removal of Intravascular Foreign Bodies With a Simple Low-Cost Method: A Report of 5 Cases.

PURPOSE: Intravascular embolization of hemodialysis and central venous catheters is a rare but potentially serious complication. With the increasing use of catheters in medical practice, we are often faced with this type of complication. Novel, simple, and low-cost techniques are needed for foreign body extraction in order to reduce cardiovascular risks. CASE REPORT: We describe the approach of 5 foreign body embolization cases. Case 1: a 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal failure with a complete fracture and migration of the distal extremity of a hemodialysis catheter. Case 2: a 55-year-old man with an accidental embolization of the distal portion of a hemodialysis catheter. Case 3: a 76-year-old woman with stage IV breast cancer and an accidental embolization of a central venous catheter guidewire. Cases 4 and 5: a 71-year-old woman and a 2-year-old boy with a port-a-cath embolization. All the patients underwent successful minimally invasive removal of the foreign bodies from the thoracic site using 5Fr pigtail catheters. Additional surgery was not required. No further complications, such as damage to the vascular wall, were noted. CONCLUSION: Our experience with the interlacing and traction pigtail show that it is a simple, practical, and low-cost technical alternative and its benefits should be widespread.

Midterm single-center results after endovascular aneurysm sealing reveal a high rate of stent graft migration, secondary aneurysm ruptures, and device-related reinterventions.

OBJECTIVE: To report procedural results and mid-term follow-up outcomes of patients treated with endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) for abdominal aortic disease. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, all patients treated with EVAS between March 2013 and January 2018 for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer were included. The datasets included demographics, aneurysm morphology, and procedural and clinical surveillance outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated within the original instructions for use (IFU-group) were compared with patients treated outside the IFU (non-IFU-group) with regard to survival, reintervention-free survival, freedom from type I endoleak, and freedom from stent graft migration. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included (67 male; median age, 72.5 years). Sixty-five patients were treated for AAA and 5 patients for abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer. Sixty-nine cases were treated electively (98.6%). Technical success was achieved in 68 cases (97.1%). The median clinical follow-up was 50.5 months (interquartile range, 29.3-62.7 months) with a median computed tomography angiographic follow-up of 38.5 months (interquartile range, 17.1-60.2 months). There were five deaths during the study period (7.1%), four of which were aneurysm related (5.7%). Five secondary AAA ruptures were detected (7.1%). Overall, 25 of 70 patients (35.7%) underwent 35 reinterventions, mostly owing to thrombotic complications (18.6%), stent graft migration (17.1%), and type I endoleak (12.9%). Fifteen patients were treated outside of the IFU (non-IFU-group) (21.4%). The estimated reintervention-free survival for the entire cohort at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years was 94.3%, 88.5%, 72%, and 56.9%, respectively. Freedom from stent graft migration at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98.6%, 82.0%, and 47.3%, respectively. The estimated freedom from type I endoleak at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years in the IFU-group was 100%, 100%, 94.9% and, 91.1% and significantly different when compared with the non-IFU-group with 79.5%, 72.2%, 72.2%, and 72.2% (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Although the technical and initial results were satisfying, the mid-term results were disappointing. The enforcement of a close follow-up protocol for all patients treated with EVAS, especially vigilant for stent graft migration to prevent secondary type I endoleak and rupture, is strongly recommended.

Loss of Prosthetic Aortic Valve during TAVI Procedure: Endovascular Treatment in Emergent Setting.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven over the years to be a viable alternative to open surgery. A rare but severe complication is represented by the valve migration. We report a case of TAVI complication due to the loss of the prosthetic valve in the abdominal aorta treated by endovascular approach. METHODS: An 88-year-old patient with severe aortic valve stenosis, symptomatic for dyspnea was proposed for a TAVI because considered at high risk for surgery. During the TAVI procedure, the undeployed device (Edwards SAPIEN 3 - Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) detached from its delivery system. Several attempts to withdraw the valve fluctuating in the aorta into its supporting system were performed without success. An emergency endovascular treatment was promptly planned to obtain the exclusion from the flow of the embolized valve. Under local anaesthesia, through the percutaneous femoral access already present, a tube aortic endograft (EndurantTM II, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA; ETTF2828C70EE) was successfully introduced and deployed in the infrarenal aorta without any related complications. The embolized valve was completely covered by the endgraft and thus fixed to the aortic wall. The first postoperative computer tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed the correct placement of the endograft, the exclusion of the valve from the flow and the patency of the great vessels. No perioperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The patient was discharged on the ninth postoperative day with the indication to a new attempt of TAVI, through transapical access. CONCLUSIONS: In case of intraprocedural loss of an undeplyed valve during TAVI, the valve fixing through endograft deployment in infrarenal aorta is a possible solution.

Progressive Device Failure at Long Term Follow Up of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System.

OBJECTIVE: High rates of midterm failure of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System resulted in device withdrawal from the UK market. The study aim was to report long term Nellix EVAS outcomes and management of a failing device. METHODS: A retrospective review of EVAS procedures at a tertiary unit was performed. Device failure was defined as a triad of stent migration, stent separation, and secondary sac expansion, or any intervention for type 1 endoleak, device rupture, or explant. RESULTS: 161 (male n = 140, female n = 21) patients with a median follow up of 6.0 (IQR 5.0-6.6) years were included. Freedom from all cause mortality estimate at six years was 41.5%. There were 70 (43.5%) device failures with a freedom from device failure estimate at six years of 32.3%. Failure was the result of sac expansion (n = 41), caudal stent migration (n = 36), stent separation (n = 26), and secondary AAA rupture (n = 15). A substantial number of type 1 endoleaks was present (1a n = 33, 1b n = 11), but the type 2 endoleak rate was low at 3.7%. Some 36 (22.4%) patients required re-intervention. Twenty-one patients underwent explant with no 30 day deaths. Six patients underwent Nellix-in-Nellix application (NINA) with one early death from bowel ischaemia and one patient who died later from non-aneurysm related cause. Two NINA patients have ongoing sac expansion and two have had thrombosis of a Nellix limb or visceral stent. Proximal embolisation was only successful in one of six cases. CONCLUSION: The long term failure rate of Nellix EVAS is high. All patients with a device must be informed and be enrolled in enhanced surveillance. EVAS explant is an acceptable technique with favourable outcomes. Management by open explant, if the patient is fit, should be considered early and offered to those with device failure.

Enterocutaneous fistula from migration of hepatic artery infusion catheter.

We present an 84-year-old man with erosion of the chemotherapy port on his chest wall. He had a history of colorectal cancer with liver metastases more than 20 years ago, when he underwent right hemicolectomy and liver resection. A hepatic artery infusion catheter was placed for targeted administration of chemotherapy for the liver metastases. Imaging showed the catheter had migrated into the small bowel lumen. We considered the best approach for removing the migrated catheter - either remove the catheter and accept the likelihood of a low-volume enterocutaneous fistula that may self-resolve, or explore the enterocutaneous tract with a view to small bowel resection. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages here.

Costs and complications of hospital admissions for inferior vena cava filter malfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) malfunction can result from penetration, fracture, or migration of the device necessitating retrieval. Endovascular and open retrieval of IVCF have been described in institutional series without comparison. This study examines national hospital admissions for IVCF malfunction and compares the outcomes of open and endovascular retrieval. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2017) was reviewed for admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes specific for IVCF malfunction. All ICD-10 procedural codes were reviewed, and patients were divided based on open or endovascular IVCF retrieval. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and costs of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 665 patients admitted with a diagnosis of IVCF malfunction. Open IVCF retrieval was performed in 100 patients and endovascular removal in 90 patients. Of those undergoing open surgery, 45 patients (45%) required median sternotomy and 55 (55%) required abdominal surgeries. Most patients were white females with a mean age of 54.4 years (range, 49.3-59.6 years) with a history of deep venous thrombosis (55.3%) or pulmonary embolism (31.6%). Most patients with IVCF malfunction were treated in large (81.6%) or urban teaching (94.7%) hospitals situated most commonly in the South (42.1%) and Northeast (29.0%) with no difference in characteristics of the patients or the centers between the two groups. Patients undergoing open IVCF retrieval were more likely to undergo surgery on an elective basis compared with endovascular IVCF retrieval (75.0% vs 11.1%; P < .001). Open IVCF retrieval was associated with a higher likelihood of thromboembolic complication compared with endovascular retrieval (20% vs 0%; P = .04). There was a trend toward higher infectious complications and overall complications with endovascular removal, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Open retrieval was associated with a mortality of 5.0% compared with no inpatient mortality with endovascular retrieval (P = .33). The mean hospital length of stay was no difference between the two groups. Open retrieval was associated with significantly higher hospital costs than endovascular retrieval ($34,276 vs $19,758; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Filter removal for patients with IVCF malfunction is associated with significant morbidity and cost, regardless of modality of retrieval. The introduction of specific ICD-10 codes for IVCF malfunction allows researchers to study these events. The development of effective tools for outpatient retrieval of malfunctioning IVCF could decrease related hospitalization and have potential savings for the healthcare system.

A foreign body in the blood vessel: A diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.

Foreign body(FB) in soft tissue is a common injury in trauma, but it is rare for FB to enter the blood vessel. Typical causes of intravascular FB include iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic factors.A 65-year-old Chinese worker's left hand was hit by two colliding metal blocks while operating a machine tool. Then, he referred to our hospital's emergency department of orthopedics. The X-rays showed that metal FB could be seen in trapezium bone regions of the left hand. During the operation, the FB was found in the cephalic vein of his left hand, so the FB was removed by surgery. After six weeks of follow-up, he has returned to normal working conditions.The purpose of this article is to describe the diagnosis and treatment of a rare condition in the emergency department. In our emergency work, it is easy to miss the diagnosis of intravascular FB caused by trauma. To our knowledge, this is the third reported intravascular FB caused by trauma and the first reported intravascular FB was located in the vein of the hand. Detailed medical history and auxiliary examinations are the key to the diagnosis of FB in the blood vessels.

Permanent inferior vena cava filters offer greater expected patient utility at lower predicted cost.

OBJECTIVE: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were first approved for use in the United States in 2003 to address the long-term complications of migration, thrombosis, fracture, and perforation observed with permanent IVC filter implantation. Although Food and Drug Administration approval of retrievable IVC filters includes permanent implantation, the incidence of complications from long-term implantation appears to be greater than that reported with existing permanent IVC filters. Also, only a small fraction of such retrievable IVC filters are ever retrieved. The purpose of the present study was to determine the threshold retrieval rate at which the use of retrievable IVC filters could be justified. METHODS: A Markov decision tree was constructed comparing retrievable and permanent IVC filters regarding their effectiveness and cost. A review of the reported data provided outcome probabilities, and the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry was the source of the utility values for the various potential outcomes. Medicare reimbursement rates served as a proxy for costs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for various parameters, primarily to determine the retrieval rate threshold at which the use of retrievable IVC filters would outperform the use of permanent IVC filters. RESULTS: Base case analysis demonstrated a greater predicted effectiveness for permanent compared with retrievable IVC filter implantation (5.41 quality-adjusted life-years [QALY] vs 5.33 QALY) at a lower cost ($2070 vs $4650). Monte Carlo simulation at 10,000 iterations confirmed the expected utility (5.4 ± 3.0 QALY vs 5.3 ± 3.0 QALY; P = .0002) and cost ($1900 ± $7400 vs $4800 ± 9900; P < .0001) to be statistically superior for permanent IVC filters. A sensitivity analysis for the filter retrieval rate demonstrated that the strategy of using a retrievable IVC filter was never preferable for utility or cost. The superiority of permanent IVC filter placement for effectiveness and cost persisted, regardless of anticipated patient-predicted annual mortality. A two-way sensitivity analysis for both IVC filter removal rate and annual patient mortality confirmed the superiority of permanent IVC filter placement at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted effectiveness of permanent IVC filters was greater and the predicted cost lower than those for retrievable IVC filters, regardless of the IVC filter retrieval rate. This interpretation of existing reported data using Markov decision analysis modeling supports the argument that unless the long-term complication rate of retrievable IVC filters can be significantly improved, their use should be abandoned in favor of currently available permanent IVC filters.

A hook wire sliding into pulmonary artery and being extracted under DSA: a case report about a rare complication associated with lung nodule localization.

BACKGROUND: CT-guided hook wire has been recognized to be a safe and effective percutaneous localizer to identify small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO) component, while several association complications including pneumothorax, hemothorax, intrapulmonary hemorrhaging, aeroembolism and dislodgement have been reproted. However, sliding into pulmonary artery is an extremly rare comlication of hook wire localization. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old male suffered from multiple pulmonary nodules received right upper lobectomy and right lower lobe wedge resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) 3 months ago. Since it might be difficult to identify the ground-glass opacity located in the right lower lobe, a CT-guided hook wire was placed before surgery. During the operation, the hook wire unexpectedly slided into left upper lobe pulmonary artery. With the help of vascular surgery department, the hook wire was extracted by interventional therapy under digital substraction angiography (DSA). The patient was eventually recovered and discharged. CONCLUSIONS: During localization procedure, the tip of hook wire should be far from pulmonary vessels. At the beginning of the operation, the hook wire might as well be removed first. Even if the hook wire was still required to be in the pulmonary parenchyma, it should be fixed to the pleural by a titanic clip or a hemolock clip.

Spinal Cord Stimulation with Surgical Lead Improves Pain and Gait in Parkinson's Disease after a Dislocation of Percutaneous Lead: A Case Report.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is receiving increasing interests for treating pain and gait disorders in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In an SCS study, it is hard to apply a double-blind approach, especially at low frequencies, as the stimulation normally induces paresthesia which can be perceived by the patient. We herein demonstrate a case treated with SCS in which a blinding design was accomplished by an accidental dislocation of a stimulation lead. A 73-year-old man with PD was admitted to our hospital because of relapsed low back pain. This was due to the dislocation of a previously implanted SCS lead, which caused a decrease in its effectiveness in alleviating pain (from 81 to 43% measured by King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale) and improving gait (from 35 to 28% measured by the timed up and go test). A second SCS surgery using a paddle lead solved this problem, with improvements in pain and gait rebounded to 81 and 45%. In this case, the paresthesia induced by SCS (using either a paddle lead or percutaneous leads) was below the threshold of perception when the patient was sitting and standing, and a dislocation of one previously implanted percutaneous lead did not cause evident changes in his sensation of paresthesia. At last follow-up, the patient's quality of life had improved by 40% as measured by the 8-item Parkinson's Disease questionnaire (PDQ-8). This study could serve partly as a proof that low-frequency SCS is effective in improving pain as well as gait problems in PD patients, which was unlikely a result of a placebo effect.

Retroperitoneal Hematoma Caused by Suprarenal Stent Perforation Two Years after Ovation Abdominal Stent-Graft Implantation.

Retroperitoneal hematoma due to late perforation of aortic wall endograft deployment is a rare but, potentially, fatal event. We report a case of symptomatic retroperitoneal hematoma due to aortic perforation by free flow barbs of Ovation Prime stent graft. The patient was successfully treated by celiac trunk embolization and aortic cuff placement. The patient was discharged with no further treatment. At 3-month follow-up, no complications were detected.

[The buried bumper syndrome]. / Het 'buried bumper'-syndroom.

The buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Hereby the internal PEG bumper is overgrown by hypertrophic gastric mucosa and embedded into the gastric wall. Most often an endoscopic approach to remove the bumper is successful. If not, an operative removal of the plate is necessary. In this paper, we present a case of a patient in whom a BBS was diagnosed. Besides the therapeutic options to treat a BBS, in this paper we want to focus on the prevention of this complication. Consideration needs to be given as to how long after the procedure should it be loosened to prevent BBS. The distance a PEG tube is advanced and whether it should be rotated is crucial in order to prevent BBS.

Early Real-World Experience with EndoAnchors by Indication.

BACKGROUND: The Heli-FX EndoAnchor (EA) system is a transmural aortic fixation device with Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of endoleaks, endograft migration, or high-risk seal zones. Published data are primarily from industry-sponsored registries highlighting safety and efficacy. Our objective is to evaluate real-world outcomes of EA usage after FDA approval across a variety of stent grafts and indications at a single institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained aneurysm database for patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with Heli-FX EAs. Technical success was defined as successful EA deployment, while procedural success was defined as absence of endoleak on completion aortogram. Cohorts were divided by indication and outcomes assessed via review of clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2018, 37 patients underwent EA fixation. We divided the cohort by indication: Group A (prior EVAR with endoleak), B (intraoperative type 1A endoleak), C (high-risk seal zone), and D (thoracic EVAR). In Group A (n = 11), all endoleaks were type 1A and a mean of 10 EAs were deployed with 100% technical and 45.4% procedural success. Two perioperative reinterventions were performed (translumbar coil embolization and proximal graft extension with bilateral renal artery stents). At a mean 10.6 months of follow-up, 45.4% of patients had persistent endoleaks, with 100% aortic-related survival. In Group B (n = 10), a mean of 8.7 EAs were used with 100% technical and procedural success. One immediate adverse event occurred (right iliac dissection from wire manipulation, treated with a covered stent). At 13.6-month mean follow-up, there was significant sac regression (mean 9.75 mm) with no type 1A endoleaks. In Group C (n = 10), a mean of 9.5 EAs were deployed with 100% technical and procedural success. At 11.2-month mean follow-up, there were no residual endoleaks and significant sac regression (mean 3.4 mm). Overall survival was 100%. In Group D (n = 6), a mean of 8.3 EAs were used with 83.3% technical and 66.6% procedural success. One immediate adverse event occurred, in which an EA embolized to the left renal artery. At 9.4-month mean follow-up, overall survival was 83.3% with a mean 2.2-mm increase in sac diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience suggests that EAs effectively treat intraoperative type 1A endoleaks and high-risk seal zones, with significant sac regression and no proximal endoleaks on follow-up. In patients treated for prior EVAR with postoperative type 1A endoleaks, fewer than half resolved after EA attempted repair. Further experience and longer term follow-up will be necessary to determine which patients most benefit from postoperative EA fixation.

Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous inferior vena cava filter retrieval rarely develop complications despite strut penetrations through the caval wall.

OBJECTIVE: We established a program for retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters within our hospital system. When percutaneous retrieval fails, we only recommend open surgical removal for symptoms and other complications. We examined our outcomes with conservative management of unsuccessful percutaneous retrieval and open surgical removal for symptomatic/complicated IVC filters. METHODS: All patients with history of IVC filter placement who were referred to us for retrieval between 2010 and 2016 were evaluated. Before retrieval, patients were evaluated for risk of future venous thromboembolic events and ongoing need for IVC filtration. Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous filter retrieval were recommended to have annual follow-up with plain abdominal radiographs and to take daily low-dose aspirin. Patients with symptoms referable to the indwelling filter and those with complications were offered open surgical removal. RESULTS: There were 213 patients with a history of IVC filter placement who underwent 220 percutaneous attempts for retrieving 214 IVC filters (four patients had two attempts, one patient had three attempts). Technical success in percutaneously retrieving the filter was 180 of 214 (84.1%) at a median of 5.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-9.2) from implant. The median filter dwell time was significantly longer in unsuccessful compared with successful retrieval attempts (8.3 months [IQR, 4.3-15.1 months] vs 5.5 months [IQR, 3.2-8.7 months]; P = .011). Of the 34 filters in 33 patients that could not be retrieved percutaneously, all had either significant filter barb penetration through the caval wall or a tilt angle of greater than 15°. The majority of patients (67%) remained asymptomatic without any further complications over a mean follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 12-50 months). No asymptomatic patients developed symptoms or complications over the follow-up period. Two of the five patients who were symptomatic underwent open surgical removal via minilaparotomy. An additional six patients who failed percutaneous retrieval at other institutions were referred to us for open surgical removal owing to symptoms or complications. Technical success for all open surgical removal of IVC filters was 100%. All patients had resolution of their symptoms after percutaneous or open surgical removal. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous IVC filter retrieval seem to have low complications in midterm follow-up despite significant filter strut penetration. Without symptoms or other complications, such patients do not require referral for open surgical filter removal. Symptomatic patients can expect low morbidity and resolution of symptoms after percutaneous or open surgical removal. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of routinely removing asymptomatic IVC filters.