Clinical outcomes after topography-guided FS-LASIK for myopia with nonastigmatic eyes.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical outcomes after topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) with Phorcides Analytic Engine (PAE) algorithm or Custom-Q FS-LASIK for myopia with nonastigmatic eyes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 90 eyes with myopia without manifest astigmatism (82 patients) were included. All surgeries were performed by topography-guided FS-LASIK planned with a PAE algorithm (42 eyes) or Custom-Q system (48 eyes). Refractive, visual outcomes and corneal aberrations were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20 or better in 42 eyes (100%) in the PAE compared with 44 eyes (92%) in Custom-Q (P = .120). The postoperative UDVA of 20/16 or better was measured in 92% of eyes in the PAE group and 81% of eyes in the Custom Q group (P = .320). Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent and refractive astigmatism were similar between the two groups (P > .05). The postoperative optical path difference (OPD) and Strehl ratio (SR) were significantly better in the PAE group compared with the Custom Q group. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided FS-LASIK with PAE algorithm or Custom Q demonstrated similar refractive efficacy and predictability. PAE for the patients with zero manifest astigmatism demonstrated better results in correcting corneal aberrations.

LASIK Versus PRK Based on Increased Risk of Corneal Haze: Assessing Current Decision-Making Capabilities of Six Artificial Intelligence Models in Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the current decision-making capabilities of 6 different artificial intelligence (AI) models by assessing their refractive surgery recommendations (laser in-situ keratomileusis [LASIK] or photorefractive keratectomy [PRK]) for a theoretical patient with a history of keloid formation. METHODS: Claude-2 (Anthropic, 2023), GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023), GPT-3.5 (OpenAI, 2022), Gemini 1.0 (Google DeepMind, 2023), Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft AI, 2023), and Google-PaLM (Google AI, 2022) underwent three systematic queries to determine the most appropriate surgical plan (LASIK or PRK) for a theoretical patient with an increasing manifest refraction of -3.50, -5.00, and -7.00 diopters (D) in both eyes, an uncomplicated ocular examination, and history of keloid formation. They were then tasked with providing published scientific references to support their responses. The AI models' recommendations were compared to those of a group of 6 experienced ophthalmologists, serving as a benchmark. RESULTS: The group of ophthalmologists unanimously recommended LASIK (6/6 ophthalmologists), in contrast to the unanimous initial recommendation for PRK from the AI models (6/6 models). Of the 42 references provided by the AI models, 55% were fictitious and 45% were authentic. Only 1 of the 6 models altered its initial recommendation to LASIK when presented with the same patient with a history of keloid formation but with increasing severity of myopia (-3.50 to 5.00 to 7.00 D). DISCUSSION: It is evident that current AI models lack the critical-thinking abilities required to accurately analyze and assess apparent risk factors in clinical scenarios, such as the risk of corneal haze after PRK at higher levels of myopia, particularly in cases with a history of keloid formation. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e533-e538.].

Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL power calculation. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 67 eyes of 49 patients with previous anterior chamber pIOL implantation analyzed the accuracy of automatic segmentation of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and its impact on anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from epithelium to lens), lens thickness measurements, and IOL power calculation. The sample was divided into two groups: correct detection of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and inaccurate detection. Segmentation of eyes from the inaccurate detection group was manually corrected and ACD and lens thickness were calculated using ImageJ software. IOL power was calculated using 7 formulas for both measurements. RESULTS: The anterior surface of the crystalline lens was mis-identified in 13 (19.4%) eyes. ACD was underestimated (Δ -0.85 ± 0.33 mm, P < .001) and lens thickness was overestimated (Δ +0.81 ± 0.25 mm, P < .001). Manual correction changed the target spherical equivalent only in the Haigis formula (P = .009). After correction for segmentation bias, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO 2.0 formulas showed the lowest prediction error, with the Pearl DGS showing greatest accuracy within ±1.00 diopters of prediction error range (81.0%). CONCLUSIONS: SS-OCT biometry misidentifies the anterior surface of the crystalline lens in a significant proportion, resulting in significant IOL power calculation error in the Haigis formula. Manual proofing of segmentation is mandatory in every patient with anterior chamber pIOL implantation. After correct segmentation, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO seem to be the best formulas. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e562-e568.].

Safety and Effectiveness of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Using the Teneo 317 Model 2 for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Results of the U.S. FDA Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new aspheric ablation profile for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study included patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a new aspheric ablation profile of the Technolas Teneo 317 (Model 2) excimer laser (version 1.28 US SW) by Technolas Perfect Vision, Bausch+Lomb, Inc. No nomogram adjustments were made, and the patient's manifest refraction was entered into the laser (for treatment). Postoperative assessments included visual and refractive outcomes. Patients were asked to complete the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 333 eyes from 168 patients with a mean age of 33 ± 7 years were included. At postoperative 9 months, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities of 20/25 or better were seen in 97.8% and 100% of eyes, respectively. None of the eyes lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The mean manifest spherical refraction improved from -5.67 ± 2.52 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.04 ± 0.32 D postoperatively, with 92.7% of eyes achieving residual refractive error within ±0.50 D. Residual refractive cylinder within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D was seen in 93% and 99.4% eyes, respectively. The refractive outcomes were stable throughout the follow-up of 9 months. The proportion of patients satisfied with their vision rose from 27.7% preoperatively to 98.1% postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK performed using a new aspheric ablation profile of the Technolas Teneo 317 (Model 2) excimer laser is safe and effective for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism, yielding excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were stable over 9 months. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e544-e553.].

Clinical Characteristic and Tear Film Biomarkers After Myopic FS-LASIK: 1-Year Prospective Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term (1-year) effect of myopic femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK) on clinical characteristics and tear film biomarkers. METHODS: Eighty eyes from 80 patients who underwent FSLASIK were evaluated. Ocular surface symptoms and signs were evaluated using specific questionnaires and tests. The corneal nerves and dendritic cells were examined using in vivo confocal microscopy. Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Tear inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides were evaluated using Luminex immunoassay. These examinations were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants completed all follow-up visits. Following FS-LASIK, ocular symptoms and signs (except Schirmer I test) worsened at 1 month but corneal and conjunctival stainings improved by 3 months. The numbers of dendritic cells and activated dendritic cells increased at the 3-month postoperative visit and recovered to preoperative levels by the 6-month visit. Ocular symptoms and corneal sensitivity recovered to preoperative levels at the 12-month visit. Tear break-up time and corneal nerve morphology were not recovered to preoperative status at the 12-month visit. Interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-17A, tumor necrosis factor-α, and substance P tear levels significantly increased at all postoperative visits compared to preoperative levels. Corneal staining scores positively correlated with tear IL-1ß and IL-17A levels, whereas corneal nerve morphology positively correlated with corneal sensitivity and negatively correlated with substance P levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although most clinical variables improved at 12 months postoperatively, some tear inflammatory cytokines and substance P remain altered beyond 12 months, indicating that ocular homeostasis is not completely recovered. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e508-e519.].

Progressive Paracentral Visual Field Loss at Low Intraocular Pressures Following LASIK.

Intraocular pressure is currently the only known reliable, modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma. Other risk factors for glaucoma include increasing age, myopia, decreased central corneal thickness, and low corneal hysteresis (CH) measurements. Photoablative keratorefractive surgery including laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become a common way to treat refractive error, with over 25 million procedures performed in the United States alone. Though myopic LASIK has been associated with a decrease in CH measurements, relatively little is known about the risk of LASIK on glaucoma onset and progression. Here we present an observational study of 4 consecutive relatively young and otherwise healthy glaucoma patients with a history of myopic LASIK who showed progression of paracentral visual field deficits at intraocular pressures of 12 mm Hg or less while being carefully monitored. Therefore, these patients required lower targets of intraocular pressure, in the single-digit range, to slow or halt progression. In this cohort, the average corneal hysteresis was more than 2 standard deviations below normal values. This series suggests that additional study into the association of LASIK and glaucoma is warranted, including the potential risk contribution of diminished CH. These studies may be particularly relevant as patients who underwent LASIK procedures in the early 2000s may now be at increased risk of glaucoma due to the risk factor of age.

Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the objective visual quality of moderate-to-high myopia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) at a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency, assisted by Smart-Pulse technology (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). METHODS: This study involved 123 patients (123 eyes) with moderate-to-high myopia between July 2020 and January 2021. They were categorized into the SMILE group (67 patients, 67 eyes) and the TransPRK group (56 patients, 56 eyes). Follow-ups were conducted at 6 months postoperatively to record the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, and the Strehl ratio and higher order aberrations were measured using the Sirius anterior segment analysis device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) under a 6-mm pupil diameter at various postoperative intervals. RESULTS: At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the SMILE group was superior to that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Strehl ratio value in the SMILE group was higher than that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, coma was greater in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for all). Spherical aberrations were lower in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < .05). At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.08 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR in the SMILE and TransPRK groups, respectively, which exceeded their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity of -0.05 ± 0.04 and -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR (all P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, the Strehl ratio, total higher order, coma, and spherical aberration differences were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical methods improved UDVA and each had its advantages. The visual quality of SMILE was superior at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (Strehl ratio values were higher than those of the TransPRK group), and its spherical aberration was lower than that of the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months; TransPRK with SmartPulse technology with a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency showed that coma was significantly lower than that of the SMILE group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e490-e498.].

Rotational Stability, Footplate Position, and Visual Outcomes of Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses in Eyes With Low Vault.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes, rotational stability, and footplate position of the toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) (STAAR Surgical) in eyes with low vault and analyze factors related to rotational stability. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 59 eyes of 59 patients with insufficient vault (< 250 µm). Postoperative rotation was defined as the difference between the achieved angle and the intraoperative fixation angle, and assessed with a digital anterior segment photograph after full mydriasis at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was used to determine the ciliary body morphology and position of the footplate. Correlation analysis was employed to identify the risk factors associated with TICL rotation at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, the mean central vault was 137.4 ± 61.0 µm (range: 40 to 236 µm), and the mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.04 and 1.15, respectively. The mean manifest refractive astigmatism decreased from -1.67 ± 0.82 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.43 ± 0.33 D postoperatively, and the mean absolute rotation was 4.50 ± 3.08 degrees (range: 0 to 12.50 degrees). The angle of rotation was correlated with the preoperative spherical power (r = -0.318, P = .014), the average value of TICL footplates position (r = 0.284, P = .029), and postoperative astigmatism (r = -.469, P⩽ .001). CONCLUSIONS: TICL implantation is predictable, safe, and effective in correcting myopic astigmatism in eyes with low vault. The rotational stability was acceptable and related to the malposition of the footplate and preoperative spherical power. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e460-e467.].

Efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and explore the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and gas tamponade in treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted on the PubMed, Web of Science and National Library of Medicine (NLM) English-language databases and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Chinese-language databases. The primary outcome measures were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT), with the secondary outcome being the postoperative complication rate. Data analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies involving 234 eyes were included. The meta-analysis results showed the following: (1) The average postoperative BCVA improved compared with preoperative levels, with an average improvement in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution of 0.40, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: -0.44, - 0.20, p < 0.001); (2) the rate of postoperative BCVA improvement was 77% (95% CI: 65%, 90%, p < 0.001); (3) the postoperative CFT significantly decreased by an average of 385.92 µm, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: -437.85, - 333.98, p < 0.001); (4) the postoperative macular retinal complete reattachment rate was 90% (95% CI: 83%, 97%, p < 0.001); (5) the most common postoperative complication was a cataract, with an incidence of 55.9%. CONCLUSION: Using PPV combined with ILM peeling and gas tamponade to treat MF is reliable.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of myopiacorrected with corneal-wavefront-guided (CWG) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with AMARIS 1050S (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH & Co. KG) and corneal-topography-guided (CTG) LASIK with WaveLight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX). METHODS: In this prospective, pseudo-randomized expanded cohort study, a total of 266 patients were subjected to binocular LASIK surgery, either with WaveLight EX500 (WaveLight group) or Amaris 1050S (AMARIS group) platforms. Data related to right eyes were selected for analysis. Corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) was selected as the primary endpoint; while visual acuity and refraction were the secondary endpoints. All the endpoints were assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 134 eyes in the AMARIS group and 132 eyes in the WaveLight group. After 3 months of postoperative follow-up, spherical and coma aberrations were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the WaveLight group (spherical aberration: - 0.104 ± 0.199 µm; coma aberration: - 0.117 ± 0.202 µm) in comparison with the AMARIS group (spherical aberrations: 0.254 ± 0.146 µm; coma aberrations: 0.316 ± 0.297 µm). In the AMARIS group, 96.3% of the eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 while in the WaveLight group, 96.2% of the eyes achieved an UDVA of 20/20. Furthermore, the mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was - 0.02 ± 0.28 in the AMARIS group and - 0.05 ± 0.21 in the WaveLight group (P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Both WaveLight EX500 and Amaris 1050S LASIK showed excellent refractive and visual outcomes. In addition, the WaveLight group showed minimal spherical and coma aberrations when compared to the AMARIS group.

Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters. METHODS: One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates. RESULTS: A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.

Posterior corneal surface stability after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the variation and stability of the posterior cornea surface parameters (posterior cornea curvature [PCC], posterior cornea astigmatism [PCA], and posterior cornea elevation [PCE]) after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism over a period of 6 months or longer. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 284 right eyes. Patients aged 18 years or older with myopia up to -12.00 D and/or astigmatism up to -6.00 DC and who underwent femtosecond LASIK were recruited. Patients were divided into three subgroups: low myopia (-0.50 to -3.00 D), moderate myopia (>-3.00 to ≤-6.00 D), and high myopia (>-6.00 D), according to their pre-LASIK spherical equivalent (SE). The variables included for analysis were PCC (central 0-3.0 mm, pericentral 3.0-6.0 mm, and peripheral region 6.0-9.0 mm), PCE, PCA, internal anterior chamber depth, intraocular pressure, and central cornea thickness at the pre- and post-LASIK stages. RESULTS: The central PCC remained unchanged across all three myopia subgroups at 1 month when compared to the pre-LASIK stage and remained stable at 6 months. The pericentral regions became flatter across all myopia subgroups at 1 month postsurgery (P < 0.001) and remained unchanged at 6 months. This trend was not seen in the peripheral cornea regions, which remained unchanged at 1 and 6 months post-LASIK when compared to pre-LASIK mean readings. There were minimal changes in post-LASIK posterior cornea astigmatism throughout follow-up. There was no incidence of post-LASIK surgery ectasia in this study population. CONCLUSION: Post-LASIK, the different cornea subregions behaved differently. Overall, the posterior cornea surface remained stable post-LASIK across all myopia subgroups throughout follow-up.

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction by American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery formulas and Barrett True-K TK in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prediction accuracy of various intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas on American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) calculator and Barrett True-K total keratometry (TK) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery for myopia. METHODS: This retrospective study included eyes with history of myopic laser refractive surgery, which have undergone clear or cataractous lens extraction by phacoemulsification followed by IOL implantation. Those who underwent uneventful crystalline lens extraction were included. Eyes with any complication of refractive surgery or those with eventful lens extraction procedure and those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. Formulas compared were Wang-Koch-Maloney, Shammas, Haigis-L, Barrett True-K no-history formula, ASCRS average power, ASCRS maximum power on the ASCRS post-refractive calculator and the IOLMaster 700 Barrett True-K TK. Prediction error was calculated as the difference between the implanted IOL power and the predicted power by various formulae available on ASCRS online calculator. RESULTS: Forty post-myopic laser-refractive surgery eyes of 26 patients were included. Friedman's test revealed that Shammas formula, Barrett True-K, and ASCRS maximum power were significantly different from all other formulas (P < 0.00001 for each). Median absolute error (MedAE) was the least for Shammas and Barrett True-K TK formulas (0.28 [0.14, 0.36] and 0.28 [0.21, 0.39], respectively) and the highest for Wang-Koch-Maloney (1.29 [0.97, 1.61]). Shammas formula had the least variance (0.14), while Wang-Koch-Maloney formula had the maximum variance (2.66). CONCLUSION: In post-myopic laser refractive surgery eyes, Shammas formula and Barrett True-K TK no-history formula on ASCRS calculator are more accurate in predicting IOL powers.

Analysis after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: 17- to 19-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Visian implantable collamer lens (ICL) in eyes with ≥17 years of follow-up. SETTING: Single-center. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: 70 eyes from 38 patients who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2006 with V4 ICL implantation were analyzed. Preintervention data included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction, and intraocular pressure (IOP). At the 19-year mark, CDVA, refraction, IOP, endothelial count, and vault were measured using Tomey Casia 2 anterior pole tomography, along with recording long-term events. RESULTS: The operated patients had a spherical correction between -4 diopters (D) and -21 D and a cylinder up to 7.5 D. The mean CDVA (decimal) at the 17-year check-up was 0.89 ± 0.18, with a spherical equivalent of -1.05 ± 1.36 D. IOP has remained stable because mean measurements before surgery and currently were 15.16 ± 2.54 mm Hg and 16.19 ± 3.29 mm Hg, respectively. The endothelial cell count showed values of 2191 ± 386 cells/mm2, with a maximum of 2804 cells and a minimum of 1125 cells. Finally, the vault obtained was 348.53 ± 234.58 mm. Over the years, 2 eyes developed angle-closure glaucoma and 9 eyes were operated on for the development of anterior subcapsular cataracts. CONCLUSIONS: Visian ICL implantation demonstrated long-term visual and refractive stability, indicating it as a low-risk procedure. The ICL V4 model yielded satisfactory results for myopia and astigmatism correction after 17 years.

Feasibility study of treatment of mixed astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using research software.

PURPOSE: To report the preliminary experience and initial clinical results following SMILE for the treatment of mixed astigmatism. METHODS: Thirteen eyes of nine patients with a mean age of 27 ± 4.36 years were included in the series. In 8/13 eyes, myopic SMILE license and in 4/13 eyes, hyperopic SMILE license (available as part of an open/research software) was used for the treatment. The mean follow-up was 9.5 ± 8.7 (0.5-24) months, and the median follow-up was 6 months. SETTING: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India. DESIGN: Exploratory study. RESULTS: The mean preoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 1.44 ± 1.63, -2.70 ± 2.30, and -0.24 ± 1.14 D, which changed to -0.03 ± 0.30, -0.28 ± 0.48, and -0.18 ± 0.49 D, respectively, 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, 85% (11/13) eyes were within ± 0.50 D, 92% (12/13) eyes were within ± 1.00 D, while all eyes were within ± 1.50 D of SE correction. All eyes were within ± 1.00 D of cylinder correction. In addition, 92% (12/13) eyes had UDVA better than 20/32, with 54% (7/13) eyes having UDVA 20/20 or better. Safety and efficacy indices were 1.08 and 0.92, respectively. No eyes lost more than 1 line of CDVA. The mean corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) increased from 0.111 ± 0.048 to 0.209 ± 0.056 (P < 0.001). The mean objective scatter index (OSI) did not show a significant change (pre = 0.71 ± 0.69, 6 months = 0.89 ± 0.20; P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Early experience showed that SMILE was feasible for the management of eyes with mixed astigmatism, without any intraoperative complications, unique to the procedure.

The effects of refractive status on the outcomes of strabismus surgery in patients with esotropia.

BACKGROUND: The success of the strabismus surgery can hinge on several factors. One of these factors is refractive condition like hyperopia or myopia. Our study seeks to evaluate the surgical outcomes in patients with esotropia and myopia. METHODS: This case-control study encompassed all surgical cases of esotropia at Torfe and Negah Hospital between 2016 and 2021, which satisfied our specified inclusion criteria. The initial variables from electronic medical records were collected, including demographic, clinical, and surgery-related factors. At the final follow-up appointment, the level of eye deviation, both at distance and near, was recorded. We considered the operation a "success" for patients with a post-surgery distance eye deviation of 10(Pd) or less. Patients with greater deviation were classified as surgery failure. Statistical analyses were executed using SPSS software (version 16.0), and a P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients evaluated, 112 were incorporated into the study. Surgical failure was observed in 14.29% of myopic patients, 29.79% of hyperopic patients, and 31.82% of emmetropic patients. The myopia group displayed a 0.19 odd ratio for surgical failure compared to the combined hyperopia and emmetropia groups, not statistically significant (OR: 0.19, CI 95%: 0.03-1.02). Additionally, patients diagnosed with Lateral Rectus Under-action were found to be 6.85 times more likely to experience surgery failure(OR: 6.85, CI 95%: 1.52-30.94). An elevated risk of surgical failure was also identified in patients who underwent Inferior Oblique Weakening procedure, indicated by a 3.77-fold increase in the odds ratio for failure(OR: 3.77, CI 95%: 1.08-13.17). CONCLUSION: In our study, despite numerical disparities, there was no statistical difference among the success rates of all esotropia patients with different refractive errors. The patients with LRUA or IOOA showed lower success rates. Myopic patients had higher post-op overcorrection with lower reoperation rates compared to hyperopic or emmetropic patients.

Clinical History Method versus Corneal Tomographers in Estimating Corneal Power after Photorefractive Surgery

AIMS: To investigate the concordance between the corneal power determined by various approaches with two tomographers (MS-39® and Galilei G6®) and the clinical history method (CHM) in patients undergoing photorefractive surgery with excimer laser for myopic errors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing keratorefractive surgery, and having pre- and postoperative keratometries, and tomographies, were included. RESULTS: In 90 eyes, the differences in the power estimated by the CHM and the one determined by four approaches with the corneal tomographers, which included measurements of the posterior cornea, did not show statistically significant differences in their averages. However, the 95% limits of agreement were very wide. After obtaining regression formulas to adjust the values of these four variables, the results of the agreement analysis were similar. CONCLUSION: Although certain values either directly determined or derived from measurements with the Galilei® and MS-39®corneal tomographers, approximated the estimated value of postoperative corneal power according to the CHM, due to the amplitude of their limits of agreement, these calculations must be taken with care, because they may not be accurate in a given eye.

Accuracy of 12 Intraocular Lens Power Formulas After Corneal Myopic Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive accuracy of new-generation online intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery (LRS) and to evaluate the influence of corneal asphericity on the predictive accuracy. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 52 patients (78 eyes) with a history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) who subsequently underwent cataract surgery. Refractive prediction errors were calculated for 12 no-history new online formulas: 8 formulas with post-LRS versions (Barrett True-K, EVO 2.0, Hoffer QST, and Pearl DGS) using keratometry and posterior/total keratometry measured by IOLMaster 700 and 4 formulas without post-LRS versions (Cooke K6 and Kane) using keratometry and total keratometry. The refractive prediction error, mean absolute error (MAE), and percentages of eyes with prediction errors of ±0.25, ±0.50, ±0.75, ±1.00, and ±1.50 diopters (D) were compared. RESULTS: The MAEs of the 12 formulas were significantly different (F = 83.66, P < .001). The MAEs ranged from 0.62 to 0.94 D and from 1.07 to 1.84 D in the formulas with and without post-LRS versions, respectively. The EVO formula produced the lowest MAE (0.60) and MedAE (0.47), followed by the Barrett True-K (0.69 and 0.50, respectively). Each percentage of eyes with refractive prediction error was also significantly different among the 12 formulas (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The EVO and Barrett True-K formulas demonstrate comparable performance to the other existing formulas in eyes with a history of myopic LASIK/PRK. Surgeons should use these formulas with post-LRS versions and input keratometric values whenever possible. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e354-e361.].

Photorefractive Keratectomy in Experienced U.S. Naval Aviators: A Prospective Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To report on the prospective evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in experienced ametropic naval aviators that led to the approval of refractive surgery for military pilots. METHODS: This was the first study evaluating refractive surgery in naval aviators. Return to flight status after PRK and clinical outcomes and subjective and objective flight performance were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 785 U.S. naval aviators were enrolled in the study. Average preoperative refraction was -2.92 ± 1.73 diopters (D) (range: +5.25 to -9.13 D). By 6 months, 85.9% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 96.4% were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia. 94.4% of eyes achieved 20/20 or better, 74.3% had 20/16 or better, and 45.2% had 20/12.5 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 6 months. A total of 78.5% of aviators met return-to-flight criteria by 4 weeks, 83.3% by 8 weeks, and 90.8% by 12 weeks following PRK. All aviators eventually returned to full flight status. Cumulative flight experience included logging more than 48,000 flight hours and 19,500 landings in the 6 months following PRK. Psychometric questionnaire results showed that 78% reported improved ability to detect other aircraft and 92% reported improved ability to land on an aircraft carrier (82% significantly improved) compared to wearing corrective lenses. No one felt their vision was worse in these dynamic environments. All aviators indicated they would undergo the procedure again and would recommend it to a fellow aviator. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study in U.S. naval aviators determined PRK to be safe and effective in a unique patient population operating in a visually demanding and hazardous environment. The program continues to be enthusiastically supported by aviators and PRK is now allowed in all branches of the military and for National Aeronautics and Space Administration astronauts. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e371-e380.].

Risk Factors for Re-treatment After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To identify potential risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent KLEx using the VisuMax 500 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between April 2015 and December 2020. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: the control group and the re-treatment group (if they had additional refractive surgery within 2 years of the primary treatment). The effect of different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters on the re-treatment rate was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 1,822 eyes of 938 patients were analyzed. In total, 2.96% of eyes (n = 54) underwent re-treatment. The re-treated patients were more likely to be women and have high myopia, high astigmatism, steep corneas, higher ocular residual astigmatism, and residual myopic and/or astigmatic refractive error. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between re-treatment rate and age, chord µ, type of astigmatism, and corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with higher rates of retreatment after KLEx included female gender, manifest refractive high myopia (> -5.00 diopters [D]), astigmatism (> 2.00 D), spherical equivalent (> 6.00 D), ocular residual astigmatism, steeper corneas, and postoperative residual myopic and astigmatic refractive errors. This study may help to preoperatively detect patients at risk for re-treatment, improve preoperative patient counseling, and optimize patient selection to reduce future re-treatment rates. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e362-e370.].