L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule (L1CAM) Expression and Molecular Alterations Distinguish Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor From Eosinophilic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Renal low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a recently recognized renal cell neoplasm designated within the "other oncocytic tumors" category in the 2022 World Health Organization classification system. Although the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features reported for LOT have been largely consistent, the data are relatively limited. The morphologic overlap between LOT and other low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, particularly eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (E-chRCC), remains a controversial area in renal tumor classification. To address this uncertainty, we characterized and compared large cohorts of LOT (n = 67) and E-chRCC (n = 69) and revealed notable differences between the 2 entities. Clinically, LOT predominantly affected women, whereas E-chRCC showed a male predilection. Histologically, although almost all LOTs were dominated by a small-nested pattern, E-chRCC mainly showed solid and tubular architectures. Molecular analysis revealed that 87% of LOT cases harbored mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, most frequently in MTOR and RHEB genes; a subset of LOT cases had chromosomal 7 and 19q gains. In contrast, E-chRCC lacked mTORC1 mutations, and 60% of cases displayed chromosomal losses characteristic of chRCC. We also explored the cell of origin for LOT and identified L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a collecting duct and connecting tubule principal cell marker, as a highly sensitive and specific ancillary test for differentiating LOT from E-chRCC. This distinctive L1CAM immunohistochemical labeling suggests the principal cells as the cell of origin for LOT, unlike the intercalated cell origin of E-chRCC and oncocytoma. The ultrastructural analysis of LOT showed normal-appearing mitochondria and intracytoplasmic lumina with microvilli, different from what has been described for chRCC. Our study further supports LOT as a unique entity with a benign clinical course. Based on the likely cell of origin and its clinicopathologic characteristics, we propose that changing the nomenclature of LOT to "Oncocytic Principal Cell Adenoma of the Kidney" may be a better way to define and describe this entity.

L1CAM Is Not a Predictive Factor in Early-stage Squamous-cell Cervical Cancer.

AIM: Our study aimed to assess expression of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) in early-stage cervical squamous-cell cancer as a prognostic factor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution study included 154 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous cell cervical cancer between 2007 and 2017. Tumor samples from 154 patients were available for L1CAM analysis by immunohistochemistry. Among all patients, radical abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 144 cases. RESULTS: L1CAM expression was positive in 24 tumors (15.6%) of the whole group. In relation to the grade of differentiation and the presence of lymphovascular invasion, L1CAM expression did not show an association (p=0.154 and p=0.306, respectively). The disease-free interval and overall survival also did not significantly differ between L1CAM-positive and L1CAM-negative cases (p=0.427 and p=0.240, respectively). For histopathological characteristics, L1CAM-positive cases had a significantly higher median tumor size (p=0.015). Even in the selected group of 115 cases without nodal infiltration, L1CAM status had no effect on the relapse rate during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study did not confirm the results of previous studies showing L1CAM expression to be a negative prognostic factor in cervical cancer. In our study, increased L1CAM expression in early-stage squamous-cell cervical cancer was not associated with adverse prognosis regarding disease recurrence, disease-free survival, nor overall survival. L1CAM expression was correlated only with the size of the tumor.

Improving preoperative diagnosis in endometrial cancer using systematic morphological assessment and a small immunohistochemical panel.

Preoperative histopathological classification determines the primary surgical approach in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients but has only moderate agreement between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis. The aim of the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study is to determine whether histopathological assessment and a small panel of diagnostic biomarkers decreases discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis in EC. Preoperative endometrial tissue of 378 included patients with EC was stained with 15 different antibodies. Clinically relevant discrepancies in grade or histological subtype between original preoperative and reviewed postoperative diagnosis were observed in 75 (20%) patients. Highest clinically relevant discrepancy was found in grade 2 ECs (20%), compared to 5% and 14% in respectively grade 1 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs). A practical two-biomarker panel with PR and p53 improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.88-0.95) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.86). In preoperative high-grade EC, the diagnostic accuracy of histological subtype was improved by a three-immunohistochemical biomarker panel (PR, IMP3, and L1CAM) (AUC = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.88-0.98) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.81). In conclusion to improve correct preoperative diagnosis in EC, we recommend use of a panel of at least two easily accessible immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR and p53), only in grade 2 ECs. Overall, this will reduce clinically relevant discrepancies in tumor grade and subtype with postoperative diagnosis with 6% (from 20% to 14%). Addition of PR, IMP3, and L1CAM for histological subtyping in high-grade EECs resulted in a further decrease in discrepancies with 8% (from 20% to 12%).

Immunohistochemical analysis of L1 cell adhesion molecule and high endothelial venules in breast cancer brain metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The vasculature is a crucial factor in tumor development. Vascular co-option achieved by the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) and lymphocyte recruitment inside tumors by high endothelial venules (HEVs) are important prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. Their status in breast cancer brain metastasis is unknown. AIM OF THE STUDY: To explore the status of L1CAMs and HEVs in this tumor compartment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty resected breast cancer brain metastases were immunohistochemically studied for L1CAM and MECA-79, an HEV marker. Clinicopathological factors were recorded. RESULTS: Age at brain metastasis diagnosis ranged from 37 to 80 years (median 55). The time to brain metastasis development after primary tumor diagnosis ranged from 12 to 187 months (median 57). Median overall survival after brain metastasis diagnosis was 29 months. None of the tumors expressed the factors studied. CONCLUSION: L1CAM and high endothelial venules are not found in breast cancer brain metastasis.

L1CAM High Expression Associates with Poor Prognosis in Glioma but Does Not Correlate with C11orf95-RELA Fusion.

The latest WHO guideline of CNS tumor defined a RELA fusion-positive ependymoma type with extremely poor prognosis, and the expression of L1CAM was correlated well with the presence of RELA fusion. However, the L1CAM protein expression in large sample gliomas other than ependymoma, its relationship with the RELA gene and its prognostic significance remained unknown. We examined the expression of L1CAM in 565 glioma cases (WHO grade I-IV). The L1CAM IHC-positive cases were selected to test RELA fusion with FISH break-apart probes. L1CAM was positive in 109 cases (19.29%) of all 565 glioma cases, with 18.27% in low-grade gliomas and 19.84% in high-grade gliomas, respectively. Unlike ependymoma, L1CAM protein expression was not correlated with the C11orf95-RELA fusion gene in other gliomas, but it had correction with the patient age (older than 45-year-old, p = 0.006), ATRX mutation (p = 0.003) and Ki67 (p = 0.007). High expression of L1CAM was an independent prognostic factor in our cohort. Further analysis demonstrated that L1CAM strong positive expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in gliomas, both in our cohort (p < 0.001) and TCGA (p < 0.009) dataset. Although uncorrelated with C11orf95-RELA fusion, L1CAM was a significant poor prognostic marker in glioma patients. More aggressive treatment should be taken for these patients and L1CAM might be a promising therapeutic target in glioma.

L1CAM Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Full Lymphadenectomy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) has been established as an important predictor of poor survival of early-stage endometrial cancer patients. We investigated whether L1CAM remains a significant predictor of poor survival of patients with advanced-stage endometrial cancer undergoing extensive surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We prepared tissue microarray (TMA) from surgical tissue specimens of 161 endometrial cancer patients who underwent full lymphadenectomy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients at risk for recurrence, and evaluated expression of L1CAM using immunohistochemistry. The correlation between L1CAM positivity and clinicopathological factors and the prognostic significance of L1CAM expression was investigated. RESULTS: Among 161 cases who had a follow-up duration of over 3 years, 48 cases (29.8%) showed positive staining for L1CAM. L1CAM positivity was significantly correlated with non-endometrioid histology (p < 0.0001), vascular invasion (p = 0.0157), and positive cytology (p = 0.005), and was a significant predictor of poor survival among advanced-stage patients, but not early-stage patients in our cohort. L1CAM-positive patients showed a higher recurrence rate and frequency of distant failure than L1CAM-negative patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PANM) and L1CAM positivity were independent predictors of poor survival. Overall survival can be stratified into three groups by the combination of PANM and L1CAM positivity. CONCLUSION: L1CAM is an independent predictor of poor survival in endometrial cancer patients undergoing full lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, thus indicating that L1CAM can be clinically used as a biomarker to identify those patients at increased risk of recurrence.

RELA Fusion in Supratentorial Extraventricular Ependymomas: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Study of 43 Cases.

Supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas (STEEs) are relatively rare ependymomas, and their pathologic and genetic characteristics are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the histologic, immunohistochemical, and RELA fusion features, as well as to clarify in more detail the clinical courses of STEEs. Data from a total of 43 patients with STEEs was analyzed retrospectively. The status of RELA fusion was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The expression levels of L1CAM, p65, cyclin D1, and p53 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated via Kaplan-Meier estimation using the log-rank test. Among all 43 STEEs, 65.1% (28/43) are positive for RELA fusion. Interestingly, almost half of the patients with RELA fusion-positive ependymomas are adults (13/28), and 89.3% (25/28) cases are anaplastic ependymomas, which suggests that RELA fusion testing is necessary in adults with STEEs. We investigated the immunohistochemical status of p65, L1CAM and CCND1 protein expression for their ability to predict RELA fusion status. RELA fusion-positive STEEs are frequently associated with expression of p65 (85.2%), L1CAM (85.2%), and CCND1 (81.5%). The accuracy of predicting RELA fusion status was much higher when the expression of p65 and L1CAM was combined, that is, when both were immunopositive. The status of RELA fusion, p53 overexpression, and extent of tumor resection are significantly associated with prognosis.

Exosomal L1CAM Stimulates Glioblastoma Cell Motility, Proliferation, and Invasiveness.

Immunoglobulin superfamily protein L1CAM (L1, CD171) normally facilitates neuronal migration, differentiation, and axon guidance during development. Many types of cancers, including glioblastoma (GBM), also abnormally express L1, and this has been associated with poor prognosis due to increased cell proliferation, invasiveness, or metastasis. We showed previously that the soluble L1 ectodomain, which is proteolyzed from the transmembrane form, can stimulate proliferation and motility of GBM cells in vitro by acting through integrins and fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs). Minute L1-decorated exosomal vesicles also are released by GBM cells and potentially could stimulate cell motility, proliferation, and invasiveness, but this needed to be demonstrated. In the present study, we aimed to determine if minute L1-decorated extracellular vesicles (exosomes) were capable of stimulating GBM cell motility, proliferation, and invasiveness. L1-decorated exosomes were isolated from the conditioned media of the human T98G GBM cell line and were evaluated for their effects on the behavior of glioma cell lines and primary tumor cells. L1-decorated exosomes significantly increased cell velocity in the three human glioma cells tested (T98G/shL1, U-118 MG, and primary GBM cells) in a highly quantitative SuperScratch assay compared to L1-reduced exosomes from L1-attenuated T98G/shL1 cells. They also caused a marked increase in cell proliferation as determined by DNA cell cycle analysis and cell counting. In addition, L1-decorated exosomes facilitated initial GBM cell invasion when mixed with non-invasive T98G/shL1 cells in our chick embryo brain tumor model, whereas mixing with L1-reduced exosomes did not. Chemical inhibitors against focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) decreased L1-mediated motility and proliferation to varying degrees. These novel data show that L1-decoratred exosomes stimulate motility, proliferation and invasion to influence GBM cell behavior, which adds to the complexity of how L1 stimulates cancer cells through not only soluble ectodomain but also through exosomes.

Addition of IMP3 to L1CAM for discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas: a European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study.

Discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas (ECs) is clinically relevant but can be challenging for pathologists, with moderate interobserver agreement. Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) is an oncofoetal protein that is associated with nonendometrioid endometrial carcinomas but has been limited studied in endometrioid carcinomas. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of IMP3 in the discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs and its added value to L1CAM. IMP3 and L1CAM expression was assessed in tumors from 378 patients treated for EC at 1 of 9 participating European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer centers. IMP3 was expressed in 24.6% of the tumors. In general, IMP3 was more homogeneously expressed than L1CAM. IMP3 expression was significantly associated with advanced stage, nonendometrioid histology, grade 3 tumors, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, distant recurrences, overall mortality, and disease-related mortality. Simultaneous absence of IMP3 and L1CAM expression showed the highest accuracy for identifying low-grade carcinomas (area under the curve 0.766), whereas simultaneous expression of IMP3 and L1CAM was strongly associated with high-grade carcinomas (odds ratio 19.7; 95% confidence interval 9.2-42.2). Even within endometrioid carcinomas, this combination remained superior to IMP3 and L1CAM alone (odds ratio 8.6; 95% confidence interval 3.4-21.9). In conclusion, IMP3 has good diagnostic value and together with L1CAM represents the optimal combination of diagnostic markers for discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs compared to IMP3 and L1CAM alone. Because of the homogenous expression of IMP3, this marker might be valuable in preoperative biopsies when compared to the more patchy L1CAM expression.

L1CAM Immunopositivity in Anaplastic Supratentorial Ependymomas: Correlation With Clinical and Histological Parameters.

Supratentorial ependymomas (ST EPNs) are molecularly characterized, of which the RELA fusion positive tumors are the most common and aggressive subgroup. Moreover, histologically, anaplastic ST EPN (ST-AE) often mimic other central nervous system primary high-grade tumors resulting in a diagnostic dilemma. We aimed to study a cohort of ST-AE; evaluate the expression of two RELA fusion-associated markers-L1CAM and p65 (NF-κB); and correlate their expression with clinical and histological parameters. Cases of ST-AE diagnosed in our department from January 2011 to June 2016 (n = 72) were reviewed. A battery of immunohistochemical markers was employed. A total of 65 confirmed ST-AE were included in the study. Age ranged from 9 months to 60 years. There was a slight predominance in the pediatric population (57%). Male-to-female ratio was 1:1.16. Histomorphological features were varied and mimicked other high-grade tumors in several cases. L1CAM immunopositive tumors constituted 26% of cases and were predominantly seen in young children, in the frontoparietal location, and exhibited clear cell morphology with calcification. A consistent pattern of L1CAM immunopositivity was noted in paired primary and recurrent tumor samples. Our study portrays the varied clinical and histomorphological spectrum of ST-AE. The study emphasizes the association of L1CAM immunopositivity with a wide spectrum of histological parameters, literature on which is scant till date. Since ST EPN-RELA are tumors with aggressive behavior, such a correlation would be clinically relevant, particularly when there is limited access to molecular testing.

Sialic Acid and Sialylated Oligosaccharide Supplementation during Lactation Improves Learning and Memory in Rats.

Sialic acids (Sia) are postulated to improve cognitive abilities. This study evaluated Sia effects on rat behavior when administered in a free form as N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) or conjugated as 6'-sialyllactose (6'-SL). Rat milk contains Sia, which peaks at Postnatal Day 9 and drops to a minimum by Day 15. To bypass this Sia peak, a cohort of foster mothers was used to raise the experimental pups. A group of pups received a daily oral supplementation of Neu5Ac to mimic the amount naturally present in rat milk, and another group received the same molar amount of Sia as 6'-SL. The control group received water. After weaning, rats were submitted to behavioral evaluation. One year later, behavior was re-evaluated, and in vivo long-term potentiation (LTP) was performed. Brain samples were collected and analyzed at both ages. Adult rats who received Sia performed significantly better in the behavioral assessment and showed an enhanced LTP compared to controls. Within Sia groups, 6'-SL rats showed better scores in some cognitive outcomes compared to Neu5Ac rats. At weaning, an effect on polysialylated-neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM) levels in the frontal cortex was only observed in 6'-SL fed rats. Providing Sia during lactation, especially as 6'-SL, improves memory and LTP in adult rats.

Preoperative Risk Stratification of Endometrial Carcinoma: L1CAM as a Biomarker.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative or intraoperative risk assessment models are used to stratify patients with endometrial carcinoma to lymphadenectomy. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative analysis of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) can improve risk assessment. METHODS: Immunohistochemical L1CAM staining was performed on endometrial biopsies of 241 patients and paired hysterectomy samples of 75 patients. Risk assessment models based on preoperative histologic type and grade, myometrial invasion, and/or tumor diameter and alternative models incorporating preoperative L1CAM were compared with regard to their capability of predicting lymph nodal or distant metastasis. Soluble L1 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum samples of 40 patients with endometrial carcinoma. RESULTS: The concordance rate between L1CAM staining results of preoperative and hysterectomy samples was moderate (κ = 0.586, P < 0.0001). Preoperative L1CAM expression was associated with nonendometrioid histology, lymph node involvement, advanced stage, and positive peritoneal cytology. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that L1CAM did not significantly improve risk stratification algorithms based on traditional risk factors. Intraoperative tumor diameter was an effective surrogate for myometrial invasion. There was no statistical difference between L1 serum levels of patients with an L1CAM-positive or L1CAM-negative endometrial carcinoma (P = 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: L1 cell adhesion molecule expression in endometrial biopsy correlates with high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma but does not significantly improve risk stratification algorithms based on traditional factors. Soluble L1 detected in the serum of patients with endometrial carcinoma does not correlate with tumoral L1CAM expression.

Expression of L1CAM in curettage or high L1CAM level in preoperative blood samples predicts lymph node metastases and poor outcome in endometrial cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) as a strong prognostic marker in endometrial cancer. To further underline the clinical usefulness of this biomarker, we investigated L1CAM as a predictive marker for lymph node metastases and its prognostic impact in curettage specimens and preoperative plasma samples. In addition, we aimed to validate the prognostic value of L1CAM in hysterectomy specimen. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining of L1CAM was performed for 795 hysterectomy and 1134 curettage specimen from endometrial cancer patients. The L1CAM level in preoperative blood samples from 372 patients was determined using ELISA. RESULTS: Expression of L1CAM in curettage specimen was significantly correlated to L1CAM level in corresponding hysterectomy specimen (P<0.001). Both in curettage and preoperative plasma samples L1CAM upregulation was significantly associated with features of aggressive disease and poor outcome (P<0.001). The L1CAM was an independent predictor of lymph node metastases, after correction for curettage histology, both in curettage specimen (P=0.002) and plasma samples (P=0.048). In the hysterectomy samples L1CAM was significantly associated with poor outcome (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that preoperative evaluation of L1CAM levels, both in curettage or plasma samples, predicts lymph node metastases and adds valuable information on patient prognosis.

L1CAM expression associates with poor outcome in endometrioid, but not in clear cell ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the expression of L1CAM in endometrioid and clear cell ovarian carcinomas and to evaluate its correlation with clinical parameters and patient prognosis. METHODS: Tissue microarray -based immunohistochemical analysis of L1CAM expression was performed in 249 endometrioid and 140 clear cell ovarian carcinomas. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma was found in 57 of these patients. RESULTS: L1CAM expression was found in 15% of endometrioid and 23% of clear cell ovarian carcinomas. L1CAM expression was strongly associated with poor disease-specific overall survival and poor disease-free survival in endometrioid (p<0.0001, p=0.0005), but not in clear cell ovarian carcinomas. Significant association of L1CAM expression with poor overall survival was observed in grade 1-2 carcinomas (p<0.0001), but not in grade 3 tumors. In endometrioid ovarian carcinomas, L1CAM expression was associated with aggressive tumor characteristics, such as higher grade and stage, and incomplete response to primary therapy. However, L1CAM expression was not an independent prognostic factor for overall or disease-free survival. Of the 57 patients with concurrent endometrial carcinoma L1CAM positivity was found in 4 cases both in the ovarian and endometrial tumors, and in 3 cases only in the endometrial tumor. All these seven patients with L1CAM positive tumors had poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: L1CAM expression could serve as a biomarker for predicting clinical outcome and response to therapy in patients with endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, but not in clear cell carcinomas. L1CAM positivity also predicts poor outcome in patients with concurrent endometrioid ovarian and endometrial carcinomas.

L1CAM and HER2 Expression in Early Endometrioid Uterine Cancer.

Recently L1CAM was shown to be a promising biomarker for early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC). As L1CAM expression was found to be related to serous ECs and areas of serous differentiation in endometrioid carcinomas, there is evidence that L1CAM-positive cancers more likely resemble type II carcinomas. Furthermore, expression of growth factor receptor HER2 has been found to be closely associated with serous ECs. We conducted a retrospective study on 142 patients in FIGO stages I and II with endometrioid EC and analyzed L1CAM and HER2 expression by double-staining immunohistochemistry. The association between these 2 transmembrane molecules and their impact on patient outcome was analyzed. Both L1CAM and HER2 showed a significant association with recurrent disease (P<0.001 and P=0.007, respectively). We found 39 (27%) L1CAM-positive cases and 17 (12%) HER2-positive cases. About 6.3% of cases were positive for both biomarkers. Survival of L1CAM-positive patients showed a significant difference between HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients (P=0.019) regarding disease-free survival. The most unfavorable disease-free survival and overall survival was found for patients with L1CAM and HER2 double-positive tumors (P<0.001). Double immunostaining revealed a mutually exclusive staining pattern for L1CAM and HER2 expression on the level of tumor cells. In early endometrioid uterine carcinoma, an additional expression of HER2 to L1CAM seems to further worsen disease-free survival and overall survival. In terms of "personalized medicine," detection of these molecules in endometrioid ECs may open new avenues for targeted therapies with the newly available anti-HER2 drugs and/or with the upcoming humanized anti-L1CAM antibodies.

L1CAM in the Early Enteric and Urogenital System.

L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a transmembrane molecule belonging to the L1 protein family. It has shown to be a key player in axonal guidance in the course of neuronal development. Furthermore, L1CAM is also crucial for the establishment of the enteric and urogenital organs and is aberrantly expressed in cancer originating in these organs. Carcinogenesis and embryogenesis follow a lot of similar molecular pathways, but unfortunately, comprehensive data on L1CAM expression and localization in human developing organs are lacking so far. In the present study we, therefore, examined the spatiotemporal distribution of L1CAM in the early human fetal period (weeks 8-12 of gestation) by means of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization (ISH). In the epithelia of the gastrointestinal organs, L1CAM localization cannot be observed in the examined stages most likely due to their advanced polarization and differentiation. Despite these results, our ISH data indicate weak L1CAM expression, but only in few epithelial cells. The genital tracts, however, are distinctly L1CAM positive throughout the entire fetal period. We, therefore, conclude that in embryogenesis L1CAM is crucial for further differentiation of epithelia.

L1CAM expression in endometrial carcinomas: an ENITEC collaboration study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of aggressive endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) and non-endometrioid carcinomas (NEECs) is essential to improve outcome. L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression is a strong prognostic marker in stage I EECs, but less is known about L1CAM expression in advanced-stage EECs and NEECs. This study analyses L1CAM expression in a clinically representative cohort of endometrial carcinomas. METHODS: The expression of L1CAM was immunohistochemically determined in 1199 endometrial carcinomas, treated at one of the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC) centres. Staining was considered positive when >10% of the tumour cells expressed L1CAM. The association between L1CAM expression and several clincopathological characteristics and disease outcome was calculated. RESULTS: In all, L1CAM was expressed in 10% of the 935 stage I EECs, 18% of the 160 advanced stage EECs, and 75% of the 104 NEECs. The expression of L1CAM was associated with advanced stage, nodal involvement, high tumour grade, non-endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and distant recurrences in all cases, and with reduced survival in the EECs, but not in the NEECs. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of L1CAM is a strong predictor of poor outcome in EECs, but not NEECs. It is strongly associated with non-endometrioid histology and distant spread, and could improve the postoperative selection of high-risk endometrial carcinomas. The value of L1CAM expression in the preoperative selection of high-risk endometrial carcinomas should be studied.