RESUMO
The association between intra-operative hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury, mortality and length of stay has not been comprehensively evaluated in a large single-centre hip fracture population. We analysed electronic anaesthesia records of 1063 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery, collected from 2015 to 2018. Acute kidney injury, 3-, 30- and 365-day mortality and length of stay were evaluated to assess the relationship between intra-operative hypotension absolute values (≤ 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 mmHg) and duration of hypotension. The rate of acute kidney injury was 23.7%, mortality at 3-, 30- and 365 days was 3.7%, 8.0% and 25.3%, respectively, and median (IQR [range]) length of stay 8 (6-12 [0-99]) days. Median (IQR [range]) time ≤ MAP 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 mmHg was 0 (0-0.5[0-72.1]); 0 (0-4.4 [0-104.9]); 2.2 (0-8.7 [0-144.2]); 6.6 (2.2-19.7 [0-198.8]); 17.5 (6.6-37.1 [0-216.3]) minutes, and percentage of surgery time below these thresholds was 1%, 2.5%, 7.9%, 12% and 21% respectively. There were some univariate associations between hypotension and mortality; however, these were no longer evident in multivariable analysis. Multivariable analysis found no association between hypotension and acute kidney injury. Acute kidney injury was associated with male sex, antihypertensive medications and cardiac/renal comorbidities. Three-day mortality was associated with delay to surgery ? 48 hours, whilst 30-day and 365-day mortality was associated with delay to surgery ≥ 48 hours, impaired cognition and cardiac/renal comorbidities. While the rate of acute kidney injury was similar to other studies, use of vasopressors and fluids to reduce the time spent at hypotensive levels failed to reduce this complication. Intra-operative hypotension at the levels observed in this cohort may not be an important determinant of acute kidney injury, postoperative mortality and length of stay.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/mortalidade , Tratamento de Emergência/mortalidade , Fraturas do Quadril/mortalidade , Hipotensão/mortalidade , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Tratamento de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Hipotensão/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/tendências , Mortalidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The relationship between intraoperative low bispectral index (BIS) values and poor clinical outcomes has been controversial. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative complication. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of intraoperative low BIS values and hypotension on postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1862 cases of general anesthesia. We collected the cumulative time of BIS values below 20 and 40 as well as electroencephalographic suppression and documented the incidences in which these states were maintained for at least 5 min. Durations of intraoperative mean arterial pressures (MAP) less than 50 mmHg were also recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between suspected risk factors and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-day mortality and 180-day mortality were 1.5 and 3.2% respectively. The cumulative time in minutes for BIS values falling below 40 coupled with MAP falling below 50 mmHg was associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.53; P = .019). We found no association between BIS related values and 180-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative duration of BIS values less than 40 concurrent with MAP less than 50 mmHg was associated with 90-day postoperative mortality, not 180-day postoperative mortality.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/mortalidade , Hipotensão/mortalidade , Hipotensão/fisiopatologia , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Monitores de Consciência/tendências , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Eletroencefalografia/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/tendências , Mortalidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoAssuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar/terapia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/terapia , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Mortalidade/tendências , Assistência Perioperatória/mortalidade , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Estimating surgical risk is critical for perioperative decision making and risk stratification. Current risk-adjustment measures do not integrate dynamic clinical parameters along with baseline patient characteristics, which may allow a more accurate prediction of surgical risk. The goal of this study was to determine whether the preoperative Risk Quantification Index (RQI) and Present-On-Admission Risk (POARisk) models would be improved by including the intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). METHODS: The authors identified adult patients admitted after noncardiac surgery. The RQI and POARisk were calculated using published methodologies, and model performance was compared with and without the SAS. Relative quality was measured using Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Calibration was compared by the Brier score. Discrimination was compared by the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROCs) using a bootstrapping procedure for bias correction. RESULTS: SAS alone was a statistically significant predictor of both 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.0001). The RQI had excellent discrimination with an AUROC of 0.8433, which increased to 0.8529 with the addition of the SAS. The POARisk had excellent discrimination with an AUROC of 0.8608, which increased to 0.8645 by including the SAS. Similarly, overall performance and relative quality increased. CONCLUSIONS: While AUROC values increased, the RQI and POARisk preoperative risk models were not meaningfully improved by adding intraoperative risk using the SAS. In addition to the estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate, and lowest mean arterial pressure, other dynamic clinical parameters from the patient's intraoperative course may need to be combined with procedural risk estimate models to improve risk stratification.
Assuntos
Modelos Teóricos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Admissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/normas , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/mortalidade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although deviations in intraoperative blood pressure are assumed to be associated with postoperative mortality, critical blood pressure thresholds remain undefined. Therefore, the authors estimated the intraoperative thresholds of systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean blood pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) associated with increased risk-adjusted 30-day mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study combined intraoperative blood pressure data from six Veterans Affairs medical centers with 30-day outcomes to determine the risk-adjusted associations between intraoperative blood pressure and 30-day mortality. Deviations in blood pressure were assessed using three methods: (1) population thresholds (individual patient sum of area under threshold [AUT] or area over threshold 2 SDs from the mean of the population intraoperative blood pressure values), (2). absolute thresholds, and (3) percent change from baseline blood pressure. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was associated with (1) population threshold: systolic AUT (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2 to 4.8), mean AUT (2.8; 1.9 to 4.3), and diastolic AUT (2.4; 1.6 to 3.8). Approximate conversions of AUT into its separate components of pressure and time were SBP < 67 mmHg for more than 8.2 min, MAP < 49 mmHg for more than 3.9 min, DBP < 33 mmHg for more than 4.4 min. (2) Absolute threshold: SBP < 70 mmHg for more than or equal to 5 min (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.9), MAP < 49 mmHg for more than or equal to 5 min (2.4; 1.3 to 4.6), and DBP < 30 mmHg for more than or equal to 5 min (3.2; 1.8 to 5.5). (3) Percent change: MAP decreases to more than 50% from baseline for more than or equal to 5 min (2.7; 1.5 to 5.0). Intraoperative hypertension was not associated with 30-day mortality with any of these techniques. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative hypotension, but not hypertension, is associated with increased 30-day operative mortality.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos/tendências , Hipertensão/mortalidade , Hipotensão/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/mortalidade , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipotensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Mortalidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relationship between intraoperative blood pressure variability and mortality after noncardiac surgery. Therefore, the authors tested the hypothesis that blood pressure variability, independent from absolute blood pressure, is associated with increased 30-day mortality. METHODS: Baseline and intraoperative variables plus 30-day mortality were obtained for 104,401 adults having noncardiac surgery lasting 60 min or longer. In confounder-adjusted models, the authors evaluated the associations between 30-day mortality and both time-weighted average intraoperative mean arterial pressure (TWA-MAP) and measures of intraoperative MAP variability--including generalized average real variability of MAP (ARV-MAP) and SD of MAP (SD-MAP). RESULTS: Mean ± SD TWA-MAP was 84 ± 10 mmHg, and ARV-MAP was 2.5 ± 1.3 mmHg/min. TWA-MAP was strongly related to 30-day mortality, which more than tripled as TWA-MAP decreased from 80 to 50 mmHg. ARV-MAP was only marginally related to 30-day mortality (P = 0.033) after adjusting for TWA-MAP. Compared with median ARV-MAP, odds ratio (95% CI) for 30-day mortality was 1.14 (1.03 to 1.25) for low ARV-MAP (first quartile) and 0.94 (0.88 to 0.99) for high ARV-MAP (third quartile). Odds of 30-day mortality decreased as five-level categorized ARV-MAP increased (0.92; 0.87 to 0.99 for one category increase; P = 0.015). Secondarily, cumulative duration of MAP less than 50, 55, 60, 70, and 80 mmHg was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although lower mean arterial pressure is strongly associated with mortality, lower intraoperative blood pressure variability per se is only mildly associated with postoperative mortality after noncardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Pressão Arterial , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Arterial/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: AMRA (adverse metabolic or muscular reaction to anesthesia) reports submitted to The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States from 1987 to 2006 revealed a 2.7% cardiac arrest and a 1.4% death rate for 291 malignant hyperthermia (MH) events. We analyzed 6 years of recent data to update MH cardiac arrest and death rates, summarized characteristics associated with cardiac arrest and death, and documented differences between early and recent cohorts of patients in the MH Registry. We also tested whether the available data supported the hypothesis that risk of dying from an episode of MH is increased in patients with inadequate temperature monitoring. METHODS: We included U.S. or Canadian reports of adverse events after administration of at least 1 anesthetic drug, received between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2012, with an MH clinical grading scale rank of "very likely MH" or "almost certain MH." We excluded reports that, after review, were judged to be due to pathologic conditions other than MH. We analyzed patient demographics, family and patient anesthetic history, anesthetic management including temperature monitoring, initial dantrolene dose, use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, MH complications, survival, and reported molecular genetic DNA analysis of RYR1 and CACNA1S. A one-sided Cochran-Armitage test for proportions evaluated associations between mode of monitoring and mortality. We used Miettinen and Nurminen's method for assessing the relative risk of dying according to monitoring method. We used the P value of the slope to evaluate the relationship between duration of anesthetic exposure before dantrolene administration and peak temperature. We calculated the relative risk of death in this cohort compared with our previous cohort by using the Miettinen and Nurminen method adjusted for 4 comparisons. RESULTS: Of 189 AMRA reports, 84 met our inclusion criteria. These included 7 (8.3%) cardiac arrests, no successful resuscitations, and 8 (9.5%) deaths. Of the 8 patients who died, 7 underwent elective surgeries considered low to intermediate risk. The average age of patients who died was 31.4 ± 16.9 years. Five were healthy preoperatively. Three of the 8 patients had unrevealed MH family history. Four of 8 anesthetics were performed in freestanding facilities. In those who died, 3 MH-causative RYR1 mutations and 3 RYR1 variants likely to have been pathogenic were found in the 6 patients in whom RYR1 was examined. Compared to core temperature monitoring, the relative risk of dying with no temperature monitoring was 13.8 (lower limit 2.1). Compared to core temperature monitoring, the relative risk of dying with skin temperature monitoring was 9.7 (1.5). Temperature monitoring mode best distinguished patients who lived from those who died. End-tidal CO2 was the worst physiologic measure to distinguish patients who lived from those who died. Longer anesthetic exposures before dantrolene were associated with higher peak temperatures (P = 0.00056). Compared with the early cohort, the recent cohort had a higher percentage of MH deaths (4/291 vs 8/84; relative risk = 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-28; P = 0.0043 after adjustment for 4 comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a thorough understanding of the management of MH and the availability of a specific antidote, the risk of dying from an MH episode remains unacceptably high. To increase the chance of successful MH treatment, the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the U.S. monitoring standards should be altered to require core temperature monitoring for all general anesthetics lasting 30 minutes or longer.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/mortalidade , Regulação da Temperatura Corporal , Hipertermia Maligna/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Termometria/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Canais de Cálcio/genética , Canais de Cálcio Tipo L , Canadá/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Hipertermia Maligna/diagnóstico , Hipertermia Maligna/genética , Hipertermia Maligna/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/efeitos adversos , Mutação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Canal de Liberação de Cálcio do Receptor de Rianodina/genética , Termometria/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few data support an association between blood pressure variability and clinical outcomes during cardiac surgery. We tested the hypothesis that intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability outside a targeted blood pressure range predicts 30-day mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Electronically captured blood pressure data from 7,504 consecutive coronary bypass surgery procedures between September 1, 1996, and December 31, 2005, were divided into development and validation cohorts. Systolic blood pressure variability episodes outside a blood pressure range (e.g., higher than 135 or lower than 95 mmHg) were characterized by number of episodes, magnitude of episode, duration of episode, and magnitude x duration of excursion (i.e., area under the curve). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess 30-day mortality association. The most predictive mortality risk characteristic and blood pressure range was tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 3.1 million intraoperative blood pressure evaluations were analyzed. Systolic blood pressure variability was derived in 5,038 patients and validated in 2,466 patients (8% without cardiopulmonary bypass and 6% with valve procedure). Among all tested indices of blood pressure variability, mean duration of systolic excursion (outside a range of 105-130 mmHg) was most predictive of 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 1.03 per minute, 95% CI 1.02-1.39, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood pressure variability is associated with 30-day postoperative mortality in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery.
Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite possible advantages, few surgical series report specifically on awake craniotomy for intrinsic brain tumors in eloquent brain areas. OBJECTIVES: Primary: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fully awake craniotomy (FAC) for the resection of primary supratentorial brain tumors (PSBT) near or in eloquent brain areas (EBA) in a developing country. Secondary: To evaluate the impact of previous surgical history and different treatment modalities on outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2007, 79 consecutive FACs for resection PSBT near or in EBA, performed by a single surgeon, were prospectively followed. Two groups were defined based on time period and surgical team: group A operated on from March 1998 to July 2004 without a multidisciplinary team and group B operated on from August 2004 to October 2007 in a multidisciplinary setting. For both time periods, two groups were defined: group I had no previous history of craniotomy, while group II had undergone a previous craniotomy for a PSBT. Forty-six patients were operated on in group A, 46 in group B, 49 in group I and 30 in group II. Psychological assessment and selection were obligatory. The preferred anesthetic procedure was an intravenous high-dose opioid infusion (Fentanil 50 microg, bolus infusion until a minimum dose of 10 microg/kg). Generous scalp and periosteous infiltrations were performed. Functional cortical mapping was performed in every case. Continuous somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and phase reversal localization were available in 48 cases. Standard microsurgical techniques were performed and monitored by continuous clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Clinical data showed differences in time since clinical onset (p < 0.001), slowness of thought (p = 0.02) and memory deficits (p < 0.001) between study periods and also time since recent seizure onset for groups I and II (p = 0.001). Mean tumor volume was 51.2 +/- 48.7 cm3 and was not different among the four groups. The mean extent of tumor reduction was 90.0 +/- 12.7% and was similar for the whole series. A trend toward a larger incidence of glioblastoma multiforme occurred in group B (p = 0.05) and I (p = 0.04). Recovery of previous motor deficits was observed in 75.0% of patients, while motor worsening in 8.9% of cases. Recovery of semantic language deficits, control of refractory seizures and motor worsening were statistically more frequent in group B (p = 0.01). Satisfaction with the procedure was reported by 89.9% of patients, which was similar for all groups. Clinical complications were minimal, and surgical mortality was 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that FAC is safe and effective for the resection of PSBT in EBA as the main technique, and in a multidisciplinary context is associated with greater clinical and physiological monitoring. The previous history of craniotomy for PSBT did not seem to influence the outcome.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Córtex Cerebral/cirurgia , Craniotomia/métodos , Período Intraoperatório , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Mapeamento Encefálico/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/fisiopatologia , Córtex Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Córtex Cerebral/patologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Craniotomia/mortalidade , Craniotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Potenciais Somatossensoriais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/mortalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Paresia/etiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Paresia/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Quantitative estimates of how anesthesia management impacts perioperative morbidity and mortality are limited. The authors performed a study to identify risk factors related to anesthesia management for 24-h postoperative severe morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A case-control study was performed of all patients undergoing anesthesia (1995-1997). Cases were patients who either remained comatose or died during or within 24 h of undergoing anesthesia. Controls were patients who neither remained comatose nor died during or within 24 hours of undergoing anesthesia. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire, the anesthesia and recovery form. Odds ratios were calculated for risk factors, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 869,483 patients; 807 cases and 883 controls were analyzed. The incidence of 24-h postoperative death was 8.8 (95% confidence interval, 8.2-9.5) per 10,000 anesthetics. The incidence of coma was 0.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.6). Anesthesia management factors that were statistically significantly associated with a decreased risk were: equipment check with protocol and checklist (odds ratio, 0.64), documentation of the equipment check (odds ratio, 0.61), a directly available anesthesiologist (odds ratio, 0.46), no change of anesthesiologist during anesthesia (odds ratio, 0.44), presence of a full-time working anesthetic nurse (odds ratio, 0.41), two persons present at emergence (odds ratio, 0.69), reversal of anesthesia (for muscle relaxants and the combination of muscle relaxants and opiates; odds ratios, 0.10 and 0.29, respectively), and postoperative pain medication as opposed to no pain medication, particularly if administered epidurally or intramuscularly as opposed to intravenously. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after surgery is substantial and an association was established between perioperative coma and death and anesthesia management factors like intraoperative presence of anesthesia personnel, administration of drugs intraoperatively and postoperatively, and characteristics of delivered intraoperative and postoperative anesthetic care.