Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy for treating urolithiasis in ectopic pelvic kidneys.

INTRODUCTION: The management of urolithiasis ectopic pelvic kidneys (EPK) can be challenging because of the aberrant anatomy (1-4). We demonstrate the step-by-step technique of the laparoscopic approach for treating urolithiasis in EPK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three men with EPK (2 left, 1 right) underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy through a transperitoneal approach. After establishing the pneumoperitoneum, the parietal peritoneum was opened at the parietal colic sulcus and the bowel displaced medially. The kidney was identified in the retroperitoneum and the renal pelvis exposed after removal of the perirenal adipose tissue. The renal pelvis was opened, and the stones were identified and retrieved with forceps in 2 cases and with a flexible nephroscope in 1 case. The renal pelvis was closed with a 3/0 running barbed suture. A DJ stent was placed in all patients. RESULTS: For the first time, a laparoscopic technique for treating stones in the ectopic kidney is demonstrated in detail. Mean patient age was 52.6 years (44-58). The mean stone size was 22.3 mm (20-24 mm). Stones were in the renal pelvis in 2 cases and in the inferior calyx in 1 case. Mean operative time was 146 minutes (135-155 min). Mean estimated blood loss was 116 ml (60-140 ml). No complications were observed. The mean hospital stay was 3 days. The DJ stents were removed after 3 weeks. All patients were stone free at the postoperative CT scan with a mean follow-up of 3.3 months (1-6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy can be an effective and reproducible minimally invasive technique for treating urolithiasis in EPK.

Simplified PADUA renal (SPARE) nephrometry score validation and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines suggest the use of anatomic scores to predict surgical outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). We aimed at validating the use of Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) nephrometry score in robot-assisted PN (RAPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive RAPN patients were included. Primary endpoints were overall complications, postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and TRIFECTA achievement. Secondary endpoint was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease at last follow-up. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used. RESULTS: Of 368 patients, 229 (62%) vs. 116 (31%) vs. 23 (6.2%) harboured low- vs. intermediate- vs. high-risk renal mass, according to SPARE classification. SPARE score predicted higher risk of overall complications (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, 95%CI 1.09-1.39; P < 0.001), and postoperative AKI (OR: 1.20, 95%CI 1.08-1.35; P < 0.01). Moreover, SPARE score was associated with lower TRIFECTA achievement (OR: 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02). Predicted accuracy was 0.643, 0.614 and 0.613, respectively. After a median follow-up of 40 (IQR: 21-66) months, eGFR decrease ranged from -7% in low-risk to -17% in high-risk SPARE. CONCLUSIONS: SPARE scoring system predicts surgical success in RAPN patients. Moreover, SPARE score is associated with eGFR decrease at long-term follow-up. Thus, the adoption of SPARE score to objectively assess tumor complexity prior to RAPN may be preferable.

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treating the Patients with Staghorn Kidney Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance and outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the management of staghorn kidney stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a parallel-group randomized clinical trial study carried out on 68 patients with staghorn stones (one single piece or maximally two-piece stones with large extra renal part) over 18 years referred to Labbafinejhad Hospital. Patients were randomly divided on a ratio of 1:1 into two groups of LPL and PCNL using random allocation software. The primary outcome was the stone free rate, which was evaluated with KUB, and ultrasonography. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, bleeding, fever, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean±SD age of patients in PCNL and LPL groups were 48.50 ± 13.33 years and 52.17 ± 15.74 years, respectively (P=.303). LPL was associated with a higher duration of surgery (196.55 ± 26.58 minutes versus 110.88 ± 34.82; P=.001). Hemoglobin drop in the PCNL group was higher than the LPL group (2.67 ± 2.61 g/dL versus -0.7912 ± 1.06 g/dL; P=.001). Stone free status was observed in 29 (85.3%) patients in the LPL group, which was significantly higher than the PCNL group (22 patients, 64.7%; P =.050). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that LPL offers a higher stone free rate with less bleeding in patients with single particle or limited particles staghorn stones with extrarenal pelvis but is associated with a higher duration of operation. The application of LPL in patients with multiple stones carries a lower achievement and is not encouraged.

Hybrid Retroperitoneoscopic Pyeloplasty for Congenital Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Weighing Less than 10 kg.

Introduction: Success rate of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children is comparable with open pyeloplasty. Prolonged ileus and injury to adjacent viscera more often occurred in transperitoneal approach; however, longer operation time is noted in retroperitoneal approach. Purpose: This study presented a hybrid retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty (HRP), for congenital UPJO in infants weighing <10 kg. Materials and Methods: From February 2017 to June 2020, 10 HRP procedures were performed in 9 patients by 1 surgeon. Retroperitoneal dissection of the renal pelvis and the upper third ureter was first performed, followed by extracorporeal suturing for pyeloureterostomy. Results: Mean operative age and body weight were 4.23 ± 3.69 months and 6.18 ± 1.57 kg. Operative, CO2 inflation, and extracorporeal suture time were 147.9 ± 39.5, 40.6 ± 11.2, and 62.9 ± 26.1 minutes, respectively. Surgical outcome was confirmed by renal ultrasound and diuretic renogram. Postoperative follow-up duration was 15.2 ± 7.7 months. Three patients had postoperative febrile urinary tract infection and recovered after antibiotic treatment. Conclusion: In infants or smaller children with UPJO, the HRP procedure may be considered as an effective and minimally invasive alternative with shorter learning curve for inexperienced surgeons.

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral renal stone surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in renal stone cases with previous renal surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 190 consecutive patients with renal stones, who were candidates for transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups. In group A, 163 patients without a history of renal surgery underwent standard laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, whereas in group B laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was performed in 27 patients with a history of kidney stone surgery including percutaneous nephrolithotomy or open stone surgery. All intraoperative data including the operating time and complications such as bleeding requiring transfusion were recorded. Postoperative data such as length of hospitalization, hemoglobin level alteration, and other complications were also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the preoperative data such as stone size, stone site, age, sex, and stone side between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate between the two groups (p = 0.4). There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding the operating time, hospital stay, stone-free rate, complications, and transfusion rate. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy can be used as a safe and feasible treatment modality in the setting of previous renal surgery. The complications and stone-free rate of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with history of renal surgery are acceptable.

Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with the effectiveness and safety of RIRS under general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, CNKI and the Cochrane Library through May 2020. Two reviewers searched the literature, independently extracted data and evaluated the study quality based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data analysis was performed with the software program Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 580 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled data showed that RIRS under RA achieved a similar stone-free rate (SFR) as that under GA (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91, 1.02; p = 0.22) but reduced the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score (mean difference (MD) -0.86, 95% CI -1.29, -0.42; p = 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in terms of operation duration (MD 1.71, 95% CI -10.61,14.03; p = 0.79) or hospital stay (MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.18, 0.34; p = 0.54). In addition, the evidence was insufficient to suggest a significant difference in the occurrence of complications associated with RA compared with those associated with GA. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that RA is an effective and safe anaesthesia method for RIRS. Compared with GA, RA is associated with less postoperative pain. Moreover, patients may benefit from RA in terms of economic factors. Nevertheless, large-sample, multi-centric RCTs with strict standards should be performed to confirm these findings.

Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy for the Management of Large Renal Stones with Intrarenal Pelvis Anatomy.

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) in the management of renal stones is evolving. One of the challenges in LPL for renal stones is patients with intrarenal pelvis. Here we present our experience with laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the management of renal stones with intrarenal pelvis anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients candidate for laparoscopic pyelolithotomy from February 2014 to March 2015 were included. Intrarenal pelvis was defined as > 50% of the renal pelvis area contained inside renal parenchyma. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was done by transperitoneal approach. Residual stones were checked by computed tomography and/or intravenous pyelography and ultrasonography 6 weeks after the operation. RESULTS: 28 patients were included in this study. The mean±SD of patients' age was 45.8±12.5 years. 19 patients (68%) were male. Stone locations were pelvis, multiple, and staghorn in 22, 3, and 3 patients respectively. The mean±SD of operation duration was 160±48 minutes. Residual stones were observed in 3 patients with multiple (n=2) or staghorn (n=1) stones. Urinary leak was observed in 3 patients and was managed conservatively in 2 patients. In one patient ureteral stent was inserted by cystoscopy. No conversion to open surgery or re-operation occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a feasible operation for patients with renal stones and intrarenal pelvis in centers with adequate experience in laparoscopy. However, the success of LPL decreases in patients with multiple stones and intrarenal pelvis.

Comparison of a Modified Antegrade and Retrograde Ureteral Double-J Stenting Techniques during Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the effect of a modified antegrade and retrograde double-J stenting techniques on stenting and operation time in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic pyeloplasty. METHODS: A total of 74 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic pyeloplasty were enrolled into this study. The antegrade (Group 1) and retrograde (Group 2) techniques were compared for operation time, stenting time, complication, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: There were 41 and 33 patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Both groups were similar in terms of age, side, and gender distribution. The mean operation times were 122.4 and 139.7 min in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The stenting times were 2.39 and 14.15 min in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The reoperation and complication rates were 7.3 and 6%, respectively, and similar for both groups (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our new technique significantly shortens the duration of laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty without compromising success and complication rates.

Laparoscopic Disconnected Pyeloplasty to Treat Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) in Children.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic disconnected pyeloplasty in treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 122 young children with UPJO treated from February 2015 to February 2018 at our hospital. According to the surgery type, the patients were divided into 2 groups: a laparoscopic surgery group (group A, n=69) and a traditional open surgery group (group B, n=53). RESULTS The success rate of laparoscopic disconnected pyeloplasty was 100%, and none of the patients were converted to open surgery. The mean duration of use of painkillers was 27.6±11.3 h in group A and 58.2±18.2 h in group B (p=0.012), the postoperative hospital stay was 7.8±1.5 days in group A and 11.5±2.6 days in group B (p=0.041), and the length of the incision was 1.5±0.4 cm in group A and 5.2±1.1 cm in group B (p=0.007). The incidence rate of poor surgical wound healing was 0% in group A and 7.5% in group B (p=0.020). The incidence rate of ureteral stricture was 4.3% in group A and 3.8% in group B (p=0.874) during follow-up. The 1-year follow-up showed that both the anterior and posterior diameters and glomerular filtration rate were significantly improved from the preoperation period. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic disconnected pyeloplasty to treat UPJO in young children has the same early clinical effectiveness and safety as open surgery, and this procedure has the advantages of minimal trauma, quick recovery, and good cosmetic effect.

Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy and compare results with a cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without pyelolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 43 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty between December 2012 and July 2018 at our department. Eighteen patients (42%) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. The results of patients with renal stones were compared with 25 matched patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without concomitant renal stones. Demographic data, operative and stone parameters were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding to demographic characteristics. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. In 3 cases without renal stones and 15 cases with renal stones, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean stone size was 13±5.24 mm, and the median number of stones was 1 (1-18). The success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without pyelolithotomy was 93.3% and 92.9%, respectively, as confirmed by negative diuretic renogram at postoperative 3rd months. Overall stone-free rate after laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was 93.3%. Mean operative time was 222.6765.71 minutes vs. 219.11±75.63 minutes for the pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy vs. pyeloplasty, respectively (p=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective intervention with associated good cosmetic results and high stone-free rates without significant increase in operative time or complications.

Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy

ABSTRACT Objective We aimed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy and compare results with a cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without pyelolithotomy. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 43 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty between December 2012 and July 2018 at our department. Eighteen patients (42%) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. The results of patients with renal stones were compared with 25 matched patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without concomitant renal stones. Demographic data, operative and stone parameters were compared between the groups. Results The groups were similar regarding to demographic characteristics. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. In 3 cases without renal stones and 15 cases with renal stones, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean stone size was 13±5.24 mm, and the median number of stones was 1 (1-18). The success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without pyelolithotomy was 93.3% and 92.9%, respectively, as confirmed by negative diuretic renogram at postoperative 3rd months. Overall stone-free rate after laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was 93.3%. Mean operative time was 222.6765.71 minutes vs. 219.11±75.63 minutes for the pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy vs. pyeloplasty, respectively (p=0.88). Conclusions Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective intervention with associated good cosmetic results and high stone-free rates without significant increase in operative time or complications.

Unusual cause of dysphagia.

In this case, we describe a unique case of large renal hydronephrosis in a 79-year-old Indian male patient who had initially presented with 3 months of progressive dysphagia and loss of weight. His dysphagia was initially thought to be related to the atypical diagnosis of achalasia and was being considered for an elective laparoscopic Heller myotomy. On performing CT of the abdomen, a large renal mass was discovered. However, predicament remained regarding the exact aetiology of this renal mass. This case highlights a tremendously intriguing case of dysphagia with an underlying aetiology that has not been reported elsewhere previously.

[A comparative analysis of the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy].

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) is considered as the main treatment method of patients with large and staghorn kidney stones. In some cases, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) may be an alternative option to PNL. The aim of our work was to compare the results of these surgical methods for treatment of large pelvis stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with large pelvis stones were reviewed. In 40 patients (66.7%) PNL were performed, while in 20 cases (33.3%) LP were done. In the PNL group, the average stone size was 2.7 (2.5-3.8) cm and in the LP group it was 3.0 (2.6-4.2) cm. Four patients in the LP group had kidney malrotation, one patient had pelvic dystopia, and in another case a horseshoe kidney was diagnosed. The operative time and stone-free rate, intra- and postoperative complications, the amount of blood loss and the length of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: There was no conversion in both groups. There were no significant differences in the mean length of hospitalization (4.5+/-1.5 vs 4.4+/-1.4 days) and analgesic use (2.2+/-0.9 vs 2.4+/-1.0 days) and stone-free rate (100 vs 90%) between groups. The mean operative time was significantly higher at the PL (110.0+/-25.0 vs 65.4+/-24.5 min; p less or equal 0.05), but the amount of blood loss was significantly lower (70+/-28 versus 160.0+/-55 ml; p less or equal 0.05) compared to the PNL group. CONCLUSIONS: PNL remains the main treatment method for patients with large kidney stones. However, abnormal kidneys, concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction or endoscopic treatment failure can be indications to LP.

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Bilateral Pyelolithotomy in Ectopic Pelvic Kidneys.

OBJECTIVE: To show how to perform a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and bilateral pyelolithotomy in ectopic pelvic kidneys. This is a congenital abnormality of position and rotation1 frequently associated with urolithiasis.2 Renal cell carcinoma is a very rare event in pelvic kidneys.3,4 These 2 findings in the same patient could be a surgical challenge and whenever possible a "one stage" treatment is preferred. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 44-year-old male with bilateral pelvic kidneys admitted because of left back pain. Abdominal CT scan showed a 17 mm stone in the left renal pelvis, a 12 mm stones in the right pelvis and a 34 × 27 mm right lower pole renal mass. A robotic surgery was indicated. Patient was placed in Trendelenburg position with ports configuration as for transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. The right kidney was firstly approached: after isolation of the ureter and suspension of the renal artery, a clampless partial nephrectomy was performed; then through a longitudinal pyelotomy the stone was extracted. To minimize the opening of the posterior peritoneum covering the left kidney, the site of the stone was identified by intraoperative ultrasound; then, through a longitudinal pyelotomy the stone was extracted. Given the watertight sutures and the lack of ureteral obstructions no pigtails ureteral catheters were inserted. A Jackson-Pratt drainage was placed through the inferior port. RESULTS: Consolle time was 190 minutes. Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) was 50 ml. No complications were reported. The drain was removed on the second postoperative day, assessed that creatinine dosage was equal to serum. The length of stay was 4 days. Histopathology showed a pT1a G2 clear cell renal cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins, while stones analysis was calcium oxalate. CONCLUSION: With the availability of robotic technology, the indications for minimally invasive surgery may be safely expanded to include concomitant morbidities in uncommon presentations.

Robotic Pyelolithotomy for the Intact Removal of a Complete Staghorn Calculus: A Feasible Approach Even After a Previous Open Pyelolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the steps and technique of a robotic pyelolithotomy for complete removal of a left staghorn stone after a previous open pyelolithotomy. METHODS: The patient is placed in a left modified flank position with 4 laparoscopic ports placed: 12mm port for camera paramedian to the left of the midline, 8mm robotic port left lower quadrant at the level of the umbilicus, 8mm robotic port midclavicular line 2 finger breaths below the costal margin, 12mm Airseal assistant port paramedian infraumbilical. The white line of Toldt was incised and the colon was mobilized medially. Anterior Gerota's fascia was opened and tacked to the lateral abdominal wall exposing renal pelvis and parenchyma. An intraoperative ultrasound confirmed the underlying stone. A V-shaped Gil-Vernet pyelolithotomy incision was made and Prograsp forceps were used to manipulate the stone out of the renal pelvis. The collecting system was inspected and irrigated using the robotic lens. The pyelotomy was closed with 4-0 Monocryl suture on a TF needle in 2 lengths of suture, superiorly and inferiorly. Gerota's fascia was closed over the renal pelvis and the kidney was re-retroperitonealized by tacking the colon to the white line of Toldt. The specimen was retrieved through a mini-Pfannenstiel incision via a specimen bag. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 and seen in clinic 5 weeks later for stent removal. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pyelolithotomy is a minimally invasive alternative that can be offered to patients with complete staghorn stones even after major open stone surgery. However case selection for this approach relies on the stone burden primarily in a dilated renal pelvis with limited calyceal projections. It is imperative to review preoperative imaging to understand the calyceal anatomy and the rotation required to free the stone from the collecting system.