Fibular (peroneal) neuropathy.

Fibular neuropathy has variable presenting features depending on the site of the lesion. Anatomical features make it susceptible to injury from extrinsic factors, particularly the superficial location of the nerve at the head of the fibula. There are many mechanisms of compression or other traumatic injury of the fibular nerve, as well as entrapment and intrinsic nerve lesions. Intraneural ganglion cysts are increasingly recognized when the mechanism of neuropathy is not clear from the medical history. Electrodiagnostic testing can contribute to the localization as well as the characterization of the pathologic process affecting the nerve. When the mechanism of injury is unclear from the analysis of the presentation, imaging with MRI and ultrasound may identify nerve lesions that warrant surgical intervention. The differential diagnosis of foot drop includes fibular neuropathy and other neurologic conditions, which can be distinguished through clinical and electrodiagnostic assessment. Rehabilitation measures, including ankle splinting, are important to improve function and safety when foot drop is present. Fibular neuropathy is less frequently painful than many other nerve lesions, but when it is painful, neuropathic medication may be required. Failure to spontaneously recover or the detection of a mass lesion may require surgical management.

Common Peroneal Nerve and Tarsal Tunnel Release Surgery in an Adolescent Male with Hunter Syndrome: Illustrative Case.

BACKGROUND: Children with Hunter syndrome have a high prevalence of nerve compression syndromes given the buildup of glycosaminoglycans in the tendon sheaths and soft tissue structures. These are often comorbid with orthopedic conditions given joint and tendon contractures due to the same pathology. While carpal tunnel syndrome and surgical treatment has been well-reported in this population, the literature on lower extremity nerve compression syndromes and their treatment in Hunter syndrome is sparse. OBSERVATIONS: We report the case of a 13-year-old male with a history of Hunter syndrome who presented with toe-walking and tenderness over the peroneal and tarsal tunnel areas. He underwent bilateral common peroneal nerve and tarsal tunnel releases, with findings of severe nerve compression and hypertrophied soft tissue structures demonstrating fibromuscular scarring on pathology. Post-operatively, the patient's family reported subjective improvement in lower extremity mobility and plantar flexion. LESSONS: In this case, peroneal and tarsal nerve compression were diagnosed clinically and treated effectively with surgical release and postoperative ankle casting. Given the wide differential of common comorbid orthopedic conditions in Hunter syndrome and the lack of validated electrodiagnostic normative values in this population, the history and physical examination and consideration of nerve compression syndromes are tantamount for successful workup and treatment of gait abnormalities in the child with Hunter syndrome.

One-stage Neurorrhaphy and Posterior Transposition with Gastrocnemius Fascial Flap for Common Peroneal Nerve Injury: Preliminary Results.

OBJECTIVE: Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury is a frequently encountered lower extremity injury. Furthermore, several previous studies have demonstrated that patients who underwent direct suturing of the CPN following rupture experienced unfavorable postoperative prognoses. Therefore, we aimed to present a novel modified surgical approach for CPN rupture and assess the effectiveness of this technique in restoring lower limb functionality. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients with CPN rupture who underwent one-stage neurorrhaphy and posterior transposition combined with nerve wrapping using a gastrocnemius fascial flap for CPN rupture between January 2016 and December 2020. Lower limb function was evaluated using the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system. We also assessed the influence of age, sex, duration of symptoms, mechanism of injury, and surgical modality on the postoperative recovery of lower extremity function using subgroup and regression analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (mean age = 35.76 ± 13.01 years) with at least 2 years of follow-up were included in the final analysis. The LEFS scores significantly improved after surgery at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Moreover, 67.57% of the patients achieved good or excellent postoperative outcomes (BMRC: M3 or above). Results of the subgroup analysis and regression models suggested that patients who underwent direct suturing showed better recovery of lower extremity function than those who underwent nerve grafting. CONCLUSION: One-stage neurorrhaphy and posterior transposition combined with nerve wrapping using a gastrocnemius fascial flap exhibited encouraging outcomes in restoring lower-limb function among patients with CPN rupture. This novel surgical technique is expected to be an effective method for treating CPN ruptures in the future.

Assessing Risk of Iatrogenic Peroneal Nerve Injury in All-Inside Lateral Meniscal Repair Between Standard Vs. Arthroscopic MRI.

BACKGROUND: Various studies have examined the risk of peroneal nerve injury with use of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. However, the position of the knee during standard MRI is different from that during an actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury during simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repairs on the basis of MRI scans made with the knee in both positions. METHODS: With use of axial MRI scans made with the knee in the standard position (i.e., in 30° of flexion) and in the actual position used during arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair (i.e., in a figure-of-4 position), direct lines were drawn to simulate the passage of a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteus tendon. The distance from the closest passage of each line to the peroneal nerve was measured. If a line touched or passed through the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the outer border of the peroneal nerve. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new line along the joint capsule. RESULTS: In 28 Thai patients, the shortest distances from each line to the peroneal nerve were significantly shorter on the MRI scans made with the knee in the standard position than on those made with the knee in the arthroscopic position (p < 0.05 for all). All danger areas on the MRI scans that were made with the knee in the arthroscopic position were included within the danger areas on the scans that were made with the knee in the standard position. CONCLUSIONS: Standard MRI scans of the knee can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury at the time of arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Functional outcomes of different surgical treatments for common peroneal nerve injuries: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the recovery patterns and factors influencing outcomes in patients with common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury. METHODS: This retrospective study included 45 patients with CPN injuries treated between 2009 and 2019 in Jing'an District Central Hospital. The surgical interventions were categorized into three groups: neurolysis (group A; n = 34 patients), nerve repair (group B; n = 5 patients) and tendon transfer (group C; n = 6 patients). Preoperative and postoperative sensorimotor functions were evaluated using the British Medical Research Council grading system. The outcome of measures included the numeric rating scale, walking ability, numbness and satisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal time interval between injury and surgery for predicting postoperative foot dorsiflexion function, toe dorsiflexion function, and sensory function. RESULTS: Surgical interventions led to improvements in foot dorsiflexion strength in all patient groups, enabling most to regain independent walking ability. Group A (underwent neurolysis) had significant sensory function restoration (P < 0.001), and three patients in Group B (underwent nerve repair) had sensory improvements. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal time interval for achieving M3 foot dorsiflexion recovery was 9.5 months, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 (95% CI = 0.661-1.000, P = 0.040). For M4 foot dorsiflexion recovery, the optimal cut-off was 5.5 months, with an AUC of 0.785 (95% CI = 0.575-0.995, P = 0.020). When using M3 toe dorsiflexion recovery or S4 sensory function recovery as the gold standard, the optimal cut-off remained at 5.5 months, with AUCs of 0.768 (95% CI = 0.582-0.953, P = 0.025) and 0.853 (95% CI = 0.693-1.000, P = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the importance of early surgical intervention in CPN injury recovery, with optimal outcomes achieved when surgery is performed within 5.5 to 9.5 months post-injury. These findings provide guidance for clinicians in tailoring treatment plans to the specific characteristics and requirements of CPN injury patients.

Immediate sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft at the time of sarcoma resection.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant resection of the sciatic nerve along with a malignant tumor is no longer a contraindication for limb-sparing surgery, as most of these patients remain ambulatory. However, sciatic nerve reconstruction after sarcoma resection is not commonly performed. Restoration of nerve function can improve patient quality of life. We describe our experience with four patients who underwent sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft at the time of sarcoma resection. METHODS: Because of the low chance of peroneal nerve recovery, the ipsilateral peroneal trunk was used as a graft to reconstruct the tibial trunk of the sciatic nerve. Two patients were men and two were women. Mean age was 45.3 years (range, 15-62). Mean sciatic nerve defect length was 9.4 cm (range, 8.5-12.0). Proximal thigh defects (three patients) were reconstructed with a double cable; the one patient with a distal thigh defect underwent single cable reconstruction. Mean operation time was 492 min (range, 428-682). RESULTS: Mean length of the harvested peroneal trunks was 21 cm (range, 11-26). Mean graft length was 11.9 cm (range, 11-13). Postoperative course was uneventful in all four patients. One patient died of sarcoma lung metastasis and could not be evaluated. Three patients were followed for more than 2 years. Two patients achieved British Medical Research Council grade 4 plantar flexion; the remaining patient achieved grade 5 plantar flexion and grade 4 toe flexion. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensory testing showed loss of protective sensation on the plantar surface in all three. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores at last follow-up were 60.0%, 70.0%, and 43.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft avoids reconstruction delay and scar tissue formation, which is advantageous for nerve recovery. This technique may be considered when sciatic nerve resection is anticipated during sarcoma resection.

Anterior Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome: Entrapment of the Articular Branch of Deep Peroneal Nerve: A Case Report.

CASE: A 28-year-old male patient who injured his ankle 2 years ago presented with unilateral ankle pain, tingling, and numbness for 1 year. Clinically, tenderness and positive Tinel sign were localized on anterior aspect of ankle. On exploration, deep peroneal nerve and mainly its articular branch were encased in fibrotic tissue. Decompression of both nerves resulted in symptomatic relief after surgery. CONCLUSION: High index of suspicion, a thorough medical history, meticulous clinical examination, complete knowledge of nerve anatomy, proper radiological studies, and careful surgical decompression are all necessary for the diagnosis and management of such atypical cases.

Pediatric Peroneal Nerve Palsy Secondary to Fibular Osteochondroma.

Peripheral nerve injuries due to mass effect from bony lesions can occur when the nerve exists in an anatomically constrained location, such as the common peroneal nerve at the fibular head which passes into the tight fascia of the lateral leg compartment. We report a case of a pediatric patient who developed a common peroneal nerve palsy secondary to an osteochondroma of the fibular head and describe the clinical evaluation, radiographic findings, and surgical approach. Rapid diagnosis and nerve decompression after the onset of symptoms restored full motor function at the 8-month postoperative mark.

Intraneural ganglion cyst of the peroneal nerve occurring after coronavirus disease-19 vaccination: A case report.

Ganglion cysts are relatively common, but intraneural ganglion cysts (INGCs) within peripheral nerves are rare and poorly understood. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman who presented with acute right-foot drop. She experienced acute knee pain radiating from the lateral leg to the dorsal foot two days after the first coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccination (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech). She had no history of trauma or medication use. Two weeks after the onset of symptoms, she developed a dorsiflexor weakness of the right foot (Medical Research Council grade, poor). The weakness worsened to a "trace" grade despite providing conservative management for one month. Ultrasonography revealed a fusiform echolucent structure within the course of the right common peroneal nerve around the fibular head. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intraneural cysts within the right common peroneal nerve. Nerve conduction and electromyographic studies revealed multiphasic motor unit action potentials accompanied by abnormal spontaneous activities in the innervated muscles, along with axonal degeneration of the deep peroneal nerves. Surgical removal of the cyst was performed, and the patient's symptoms gradually improved. Pathological examination revealed a cystic structure containing mucinous or gelatinous fluid and lined with flattened or cuboidal cells. The clinical course and sequential electromyographic findings relevant to this symptomatic cyst were temporally related to the vaccination date. The present case suggests that INGC-induced peroneal palsy is a possible complication after COVID-19 vaccination.

Rare giant schwannoma of superficial peroneal nerve on the dorsum of foot.

Schwannoma is a benign tumour of Schwann cells originating from myelin sheath of axons of the nerves. It is usually seen in the vestibular region, very rarely found in extremity regions. Schwannomas are termed 'Giant' when they measure more than five centimetres in a minimum of one dimension. Giant schwannomas in the foot and ankle region are extremely uncommon. Only eight cases of such a condition are reported. This is a case report of a giant schwannoma found arising from the superficial peroneal nerve in the dorsolateral aspect of the foot. This swelling was excised completely and the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology.

Surgical management of peroneal nerve injuries.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic peroneal nerve injuries are typically associated with high-energy injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics and outcomes following surgical management of peroneal nerve injuries. METHODS: Patients evaluated at a single institution with peroneal nerve injuries between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Mechanism of injury, time to surgery, pre- and postoperative examinations, and operative reports were recorded. Satisfactory outcome, defined as the ability to achieve anti-gravity dorsiflexion strength or stronger following surgery, was compared between nerve grafting and nerve transfers in patients with at least 9 months of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had follow-up greater than 9 months after surgery, with an average follow-up of 3.8 years. Surgeries included neurolysis (n=5), direct repair (n=2), tibial motor nerve fascicle transfer to the anterior tibialis motor branch (n=18), or interposition nerve grafting using sural nerve autograft (n=12). At last follow-up, 59.5% (n=22) of patients had anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. Nineteen (51.4%) patients used an ankle-foot orthosis during all or some activities. In patients that underwent nerve grafting only across the peroneal nerve defect, 44.4% (n=4) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. In patients that had a tibial nerve fascicle transfer to the tibialis anterior motor branch of the peroneal nerve, 42.9% (n=6) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion at last follow-up. There was no statistical difference between nerve transfers and nerve grafting in postoperative dorsiflexion strength (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Peroneal nerve injuries frequently occur in the setting of knee dislocations and similar high-energy injuries. Nerve surgery is not universally successful in restoration of ankle dorsiflexion, with one-third of patients requiring an ankle-foot orthosis at mid-term follow-up. Patients should be properly counseled on the treatment challenges and variable outcomes following peroneal nerve injuries.

Surgical Outcomes of Common Peroneal Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy Associated with L5 Radiculopathy.

Impingement of the common peroneal nerve, a branch of the L5 nerve root, causes common peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy (CPNE). Although there are cases of CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy, surgical intervention's effectiveness remains to be elucidated. This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery in patients with CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy. Twenty-two patients (25 limbs) with surgically treated CPNE between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The limbs were classified into two groups: group R (limbs of CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy) and group O (limbs of CPNE without L5 radiculopathy). The durations from onset to surgery, the nerve conduction studies (NCSs), and postoperative improvement rates for motor weakness, pain, and dysesthesia were compared between the groups. Group R included 15 limbs (13 patients), and group O included 10 limbs (9 patients). There were no significant differences in the duration from onset to surgery or abnormal findings of NCS between the two groups. The postoperative improvement rates were 88% and 100% (p = 0.62) for muscle weakness, 87% and 80% (p = 0.53) for pain, and 71% and 56% (p = 0.37) for dysesthesia in group R and group O, respectively, without significant differences between groups. CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy is common, and the results of the present study showed that the surgical outcomes in such cases were satisfactory and comparable to those in CPNE without L5 radiculopathy.

Characterizing peroneal nerve injury clinicoradiological patterns with MRI in patients with sciatic neuropathy and foot drop after total hip replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Sciatic nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty (THA) predominantly affects the peroneal division of the sciatic nerve, often causing a foot drop. This can result from a focal etiology (hardware malposition, prominent screw, or postoperative hematoma) or nonfocal/traction injury. The objective of this study was to compare the clinicoradiological features and define the extent of nerve injury resulting from these two distinct mechanisms. METHODS: Patients who developed a postoperative foot drop within 1 year after primary or revision THA with a confirmed proximal sciatic neuropathy based on MRI or electrodiagnostic studies were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts: group 1 (focal injury), including patients with an identifiable focal structural etiology, and group 2 (nonfocal injury), including patients with a presumed traction injury. Patient demographics, clinical examinations, subsequent surgeries, electrodiagnostic study results, and MRI abnormalities were noted. The Student t-test was used to compare time to onset of foot drop and time to secondary surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, treated by one surgeon, met inclusion criteria (8 men and 13 women; 14 primary THAs and 7 revision THAs). Group 1 had a significantly longer time from THA to the onset of foot drop, with a mean of 2 months, compared with an immediate postoperative onset in group 2 (p = 0.02). Group 1 had a consistent pattern of localized focal nerve abnormality on imaging. In contrast, the majority of patients in group 2 (n = 11) had a long, continuous segment of abnormal size and signal intensity of the nerve, while the other 3 patients had a segment of less abnormal nerve in the midthigh on imaging. All patients with a long continuous lesion had Medical Research Council grade 0 dorsiflexion prior to secondary nerve surgeries compared with 1 of 3 patients with a more normal midsegment. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct clinicoradiological findings in patients with sciatic injuries resulting from a focal structural etiology versus a traction injury. While there are discrete localized changes in patients with a focal etiology, those with traction injuries demonstrate a diffuse zone of abnormality within the sciatic nerve. A proposed mechanism involves anatomical tether points of the nerve acting as points of origin and propagation for traction injuries, resulting in an immediate postoperative foot drop. In contrast, patients with a focal etiology have localized imaging findings but a highly variable time to the onset of foot drop.

A unique variation of the deep fibular nerve: A case report.

Deep fibular nerve is one of the two terminal branches of the common fibular nerve. The deep fibular nerve can be damaged in procedures related the anterior compartment of the leg such as the application of an external fixator to the leg and operations using intramedullary nailing after tibial fracture. Therefore, it is important to know the anatomy and variations of the deep fibular nerve. An anatomical variation concerning the deep fibular nerve was detected in the right lower extremity of the 65-year-old cadaver we dissected. In this case, it was observed that the deep fibular nerve split into two nerve arms in the distal half of the leg and reunited after continuing 9cm apart to form a loop. This loop formation may increase the iatrogenic damage of the deep fibular nerve as a result of surgery and percutaneous interventions to the anterior leg compartment. We described in this case report a hitherto unobserved finding of the branching pattern of the deep fibular nerve. We think that this unique anatomical variation seen in the right lower extremity of the case of academic interest and will also help orthopedicians in anterior leg compartment surgery.

Partial tibial nerve transfer for iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy after endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins of the lower extremity: A case report.

Postprocedural peroneal nerve palsy after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins is rare and is associated with poor functional recovery. There have been no reports using tibial nerve transfer for iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy after EVLA. Herein, we present a case with peroneal nerve injury after EVLA, which was successfully treated by partial tibial nerve transfer for the first time. A 75-year-old female presented with a right foot drop immediately after EVLA of the lesser saphenous vein. The ankle and toe dorsiflexion had a muscle grade of M0 on the British Medical Research Council muscle scale, without voluntary motor unit action potentials (MUAP) in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle on the needle electromyography. Three months after the injury, surgical nerve exploration revealed a damaged common peroneal nerve with discoloration and scarring at the fibular head. Intraoperative deep peroneal nerve stimulation confirmed the absence of compound muscle action potentials in the TA. The best functioning motor fascicles of the tibial nerve were transferred to the deep peroneal main trunk involving motor branches of the TA, extensor digitorum longus, and extensor hallucis longus (EHL) through the interosseous membrane. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no complications. After 3 months of surgery, nascent MUAP appeared in the TA. After 24 months, the patient regained the TA and EHL muscle function and ambulation without an ankle-foot orthosis and tibial nerve deficits. Thus, our procedure may serve as an alternative to nerve grafting, tendon transfer, and orthoses for better management of the major neural complications associated with EVLA.

Patient Satisfaction and Pain Relief After Deep Peroneal Nerve Neurectomy for Midfoot Arthritis: A Preliminary Short Report.

BACKGROUND: The deep peroneal nerve (DPN) plays a role in afferent nociceptive dorsal midfoot joint pain perception. DPN neurectomy for treatment of symptomatic dorsal midfoot osteoarthritis allows early mobilization and weightbearing. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction and pain relief after DPN neurectomy for treatment of chronic dorsal midfoot pain due to osteoarthritis. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB-approved, questionnaire-based study, we evaluated 48 patients (55 feet) with an average follow-up of 35.1 (range, 16-51) months who underwent DPN neurectomy at our institution between September 2017 and February 2021. There were 38 women and 10 men, 41 unilateral (22 right, 19 left) and 7 bilateral procedures, with an average age of 67.8 (range, 35-88) years at the time of surgery. A questionnaire that included questions regarding postsurgical dorsal midfoot pain relief, surgical result satisfaction, and current functional limitations was administered via telephone. Demographic information, patient responses, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 80.8% were satisfied with the result of the surgery in relieving their dorsal midfoot pain, 84.6% would repeat the surgery under the same circumstances, 83.8% would recommend the surgery to a friend, 10.4% reported they wish they had undergone arthrodesis, 91.7% reported pain relief in the first 6 months, and 55.6% reported current activity limitations. Six feet (10.9%) underwent a second procedure with an average postoperative time of 20.5 (range, 1-36) months. Complications included 1 hematoma and deep wound infection, 1 DPN neuroma and superficial peroneal nerve entrapment, and 4 patients with inadequate pain relief. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, DPN neurectomy appeared to be a reasonable surgical alternative to arthrodesis for the management of chronic dorsal midfoot pain due to midfoot osteoarthritis after failed nonoperative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Common Peroneal Nerve Injury Due to an All-Inside Repair of the Posterior Horn of Lateral Meniscus: A Case Report.

CASE: An 18-year-old man sustained a peroneal nerve (PN) injury during an all-inside repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus from the medial portal. Although he could dorsiflex his ankle actively after emergence from general anesthesia, he had a foot drop on the day after surgery. Exploration of the PN at 5 months postoperatively revealed that the nerve was entrapped by the suture. Fifteen months after a nerve repair using a sural nerve graft, he recovered from the foot drop. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the risk of PN injury during an all-inside repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus.

Incidence of traumatic sciatic nerve injury in patients with acetabular fractures and factors affecting recovery: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Reports on traumatic sciatic nerve injury associated with acetabular fracture are rare. In this study, we investigated the demographics of these injuries, their clinical characteristics, management, and factors potentially influencing neurological recovery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed to have acetabular fracture at our trauma center between January 2014 and June 2021. Data on patient demographics, characteristics of sciatic nerve injury, neurological recovery, factors potentially influencing neurological recovery were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (bilateral in one case) met the diagnostic criteria. All these injuries involved the posterior wall or posterior column, and most patients had posterior dislocation of the hip joint. Four of the 19 sides with traumatic sciatic nerve injury involved the common peroneal nerve division and 15 involved both the common peroneal and tibial nerve divisions. Seventeen patients (18 sides) underwent intraoperative nerve exploration, which revealed abnormalities in 7 sides and no obvious abnormality in 11 sides. At the last follow-up, 10 sides (52.6%) had complete recovery and 9 (47.4%) had partial recovery; the difference was statistically significant between those with or without abnormal nerve damage during exploration (P = 0.046). Linear regression analysis showed that a nerve abnormality detected intraoperatively was a predictor of nerve recovery (P = 0.009). The mean recovery time was significantly longer for partial recovery than for complete recovery (13.78 months vs. 6.70 months; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All the injuries in this series involved the posterior wall or posterior column, and most patients had posterior dislocation of the hip joint. Damage to the common peroneal nerve division was more severe than that to the tibial nerve division preoperatively. However, the degree of recovery of the common peroneal division was not worse than that of the tibial division. There was a relationship between the degree of neurological recovery and whether there was an abnormality at the time of intraoperative nerve exploration. Patients with partial recovery took longer to recover.