Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibition prevents fibrosis in adipose tissue of obese mice.

BACKGROUND: During the development of obesity the expansion of white adipose tissue (WAT) leads to a dysregulation and an excessive remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to fibrosis formation. These ECM changes have high impact on WAT physiology and may change obesity progression. Blocking WAT fibrosis may have beneficial effects on the efficacy of diet regimen or therapeutical approaches in obesity. Since dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors prevent fibrosis in tissues, such as heart, liver and kidney, the objective of this study was to assess whether vildagliptin, a DPP-IV inhibitor, prevents fibrosis in WAT in a mouse model of obesity, and to investigate the mechanisms underlying this effect. METHODS: We evaluated the inhibitory effect of vildagliptin on fibrosis markers on WAT of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice and on 3T3-L1 cell line of mouse adipocytes treated with a fibrosis inducer, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFß1). RESULTS: Vildagliptin prevents the increase of fibrosis markers in WAT of HFD-fed mice and reduces blood glucose, serum triglycerides, total cholesterol and leptin levels. In the in vitro study, the inhibition of DPP-IV with vildagliptin, neuropeptide Y (NPY) treatment and NPY Y1 receptor activation prevents ECM deposition and fibrosis markers increase induced by TGFß1 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin prevents fibrosis formation in adipose tissue in obese mice, at least partially through NPY and NPY Y1 receptor activation. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the importance of vildagliptin in the treatment of fibrosis that occur in obesity.

Prenatal High Estradiol Exposure Induces Sex-Specific and Dietarily Reversible Insulin Resistance Through Decreased Hypothalamic INSR.

An adverse intrauterine environment may induce adult disease in offspring, but the mechanisms are not well understood. It is reported that fresh embryo transfer (ET) in assisted reproductive technology leads to high maternal estradiol (E2), and prenatal high E2 exposure increases the risk of organ disorders in later life. We found that male newborns and children of fresh ET showed elevated fasting insulin and homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) scores. Male mice with high prenatal estradiol exposure (HE) grew heavier than control mice and developed insulin resistance; they also showed increased food intake, with increased orexigenic hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression. The hypothalamic insulin receptor (INSR) was decreased in male HE mice, associated with elevated promoter methylation. Chronic food restriction (FR) in HE mice reversed insulin resistance and rescued hypothalamic INSR expression by correcting the elevated Insr promoter methylation. Our findings suggest that prenatal exposure to high E2 may induce sex-specific metabolic disorders in later life through epigenetic programming of hypothalamic Insr promoter, and dietary intervention may reverse insulin resistance by remodeling its methylation pattern.

Neuropeptide Y Y5-receptor activation on breast cancer cells acts as a paracrine system that stimulates VEGF expression and secretion to promote angiogenesis.

Accumulating data implicate a pathological role for sympathetic neurotransmitters like neuropeptide Y (NPY) in breast cancer progression. Our group and others reported that NPY promotes proliferation and migration in breast cancer cells, however the angiogenic potential of NPY in breast cancer is unknown. Herein we sought to determine if NPY promotes angiogenesis in vitro by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and release from 4T1 breast cancer cells. Western blot analysis revealed that NPY treatment caused a 52 ± 14% increase in VEGF expression in the 4T1 cells compared to non-treated controls. Using selective NPY Y-receptor agonists (Y1R, Y2R and Y5R) we observed an increase in VEGF expression only when cells were treated with Y5R agonist. Congruently, using selective Y1R, Y2R, or Y5R antagonists, NPY-induced increases in VEGF expression in 4T1 cells were attenuated only under Y5R antagonism. Endothelial tube formation assays were conducted using conditioned media (CM) from NPY treated 4T1 cells. Concentration-dependent increases in number of branch points and complete endothelial networks were observed in HUVEC exposed to NPY CM. CM from Y5R agonist treated 4T1 cells caused similar increases in number of branch points and complete endothelial networks. VEGF concentration was quantified in CM (ELISA) from agonist experiments; we observed a 2-fold and 2.5-fold increase in VEGF release from NPY and Y5R agonist treated 4T1 cells respectively. Overall these data highlight a novel mechanism by which NPY may promote breast cancer progression, and further implicate a pathological role of the NPY Y5R.

Modulation of methamphetamine-induced nitric oxide production by neuropeptide Y in the murine striatum.

Methamphetamine (METH) is a potent stimulant that induces both acute and long-lasting neurochemical changes in the brain including neuronal cell loss. Our laboratory demonstrated that the neuropeptide substance P enhances the striatal METH-induced production of nitric oxide (NO). In order to better understand the role of the striatal neuropeptides on the METH-induced production of NO, we used agonists and antagonists of the NPY (Y1R and Y2R) receptors infused via intrastriatal microinjection followed by a bolus of METH (30 mg/kg, ip) and measured 3-NT immunofluorescence, an indirect index of NO production. One striatum received pharmacological agent while the contralateral striatum received aCSF and served as control. NPY receptor agonists dose dependently attenuated the METH-induced production of striatal 3-NT. Conversely, NPY receptor antagonists had the opposite effect. Moreover, METH induced the accumulation of cyclic GMP and activated caspase-3 in approximately 18% of striatal neurons, a phenomenon that was attenuated by pre-treatment with NPY2 receptor agonist. Lastly, METH increased the levels of striatal preproneuropeptide Y mRNA nearly five-fold 16 h after injection as determined by RT-PCR, suggesting increased utilization of the neuropeptide. In conclusion, NPY inhibits the METH-induced production of NO in striatal tissue. Consequently, production of this second messenger induces the accumulation of cyclic GMP and activated caspase-3 in some striatal neurons, an event that may precede the apoptosis of some striatal neurons.

Relevance of the neuropeptide Y system in the biology of cancer progression.

The peptides pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) share a similar structure, known as PP-fold. Within this family of peptides, NPY, a highly conserved 36-aminoacid residue peptide, is involved in the regulation of a wide range of physiological functions, such as food intake and energy metabolism, as well as in the promotion of some remarkable aspects of tumor progression, including cell proliferation, matrix invasion, metastatization, and angiogenesis. NPY exerts its biological effects through five G-protein coupled receptors, named Y1-, Y2-, Y4-, Y5-, and y6-R, which appear associated with different aspects of oncogenesis. Y1-R seems involved in the modulation of cancer cell proliferation, whereas Y2-R activation appears to promote angiogenesis. The development of NPY receptor subtype selective analogs has helped to elucidate the physiological and pathophysiological role and localization of each receptor and may contribute to a better understanding of the receptor-ligand interaction. The NPY system appears to be variously associated with specific tumors, including neural crest-derived tumors, breast and prostate cancers. In addition to NPY, PYY is also able to affect cancer cell growth in a dose-dependent manner and through Y-Rs. In conclusion, peptides of the NPY family and the related receptors play an important role in the progression of different cancer types, with some molecular specificity according to each step of this process. On this basis, future studies may be directed to the implementation of novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeting this system.

Neuropeptide Y receptors; antisecretory control of intestinal epithelial function.

This paper reviews the cellular localisation, mechanisms of release and intestinal absorptive actions of neuropeptide Y and its related peptides, peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide and major fragments NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36). While NPY is commonly found in inhibitory enteric neurons that can be interneurons, motor neurons or secretomotor-nonvasodilator in nature, its analogue, peptide YY in contrast, is located in neuroendocrine L-cells that predominate in the colorectal mucosa. Peptide YY is released from these cells when nutrients arrive in the small or large bowel, exerting paracrine as well as hormonal actions. Pancreatic polypeptide is found in relatively few, scattered intestinal endocrine cells, the majority of this peptide being produced by, and released from pancreatic islet F-cells in response to food intake. An introduction to the current pharmacology of this family of peptides is provided and the different types of neuropeptide Y (termed Y) receptors, their agonist preferences, antagonism, and preferred signalling pathways, are described. Our current understanding of specific Y receptor localisation within the intestine as determined by immunohistochemistry, is presented as a prelude to an assessment of functional studies that have monitored ion transport across isolated mucosal preparations. It is becoming clear that three Y receptor types are significant functionally in human colon, as well as particular rodent models (e.g. mouse) and these, namely the Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptors, are discussed in detail. Their presence within the basolateral aspect of the epithelial layer (Y(1) and Y(4) receptors) or on enteric neurons (Y(1) and Y(2) receptors) and their activation by endogenous neuropeptide Y, peptide YY (Y(1) and Y(2) receptors) or pancreatic polypeptide (which prefers Y(4) receptors) results consistently in antisecretory/absorptive responses. The recent use of novel mouse knockouts has helped establish loss of specific intestinal functions including Y(1) and Y(2) receptor-mediated absorptive tone in colon mucosa. Progress in this field has been rapid recently, aided by the availability of selective antagonists and mutant mice lacking either one (e.g. Y(4)-/-, for which no antagonists exist at present) or more Y receptor types. It is therefore timely to review this work and present a rational basis for developing stable synthetic Y receptor agonists as novel anti-diarrhoeals.

Galanin-neuropeptide Y (NPY) interactions in central cardiovascular control: involvement of the NPY Y receptor subtype.

The interactions between neuropeptide Y (NPY), specifically through NPY Y(1) and Y(2) receptor subtypes, and galanin [GAL(1-29)] have been analysed at the cardiovascular level. The cardiovascular effects of intracisternal coinjections of GAL(1-29) with NPY or NPY Y(1) or Y(2) agonists, as well as quantitative receptor autoradiography of the binding characteristics of NPY Y(1) and Y(2) receptor subtypes in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), in the presence or absence of GAL(1-29), have been investigated. The effects of coinjections of GAL(1-29) and the NPY Y(1) agonist on the expression of c-FOS immunoreactivity in the NTS were also studied. The coinjection of NPY with GAL(1-29) induced a significant vasopressor and tachycardic action with a maximum 40% increase (P < 0.001). The coinjection of the NPY Y(1) agonist and GAL(1-29) induced a similar increase in mean arterial pressure and heart rate as did NPY plus GAL(1-29), actions that were not observed with the NPY Y(2) agonist plus GAL(1-29). GAL(1-29), 3 nm, significantly and substantially (by approximately 40%) decreased NPY Y(1) agonist binding in the NTS. This effect was significantly blocked (P < 0.01) in the presence of the specific galanin antagonist M35. The NPY Y(2) agonist binding was not modified in the presence of GAL(1-29). At the c-FOS level, the coinjection of NPY Y(1) and GAL(1-29) significantly reduced the c-FOS-immunoreactive response induced by either of the two peptides. The present findings suggest the existence of a modulatory antagonistic effect of GAL(1-29) mediated via galanin receptors on the NPY Y(1) receptor subtype and its signalling within the NTS.

Introduction to the reviews on neuropeptide Y.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) was first reported as an abundant peptide in brain tissue in 1982. Shortly thereafter, NPY was found to be a member of a peptide family consisting of the endocrine peptides pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and peptide YY (PYY). These peptides exert most of their biological effects through five G-protein coupled receptors termed Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5 and y6 that mediate either inhibition adenylate cyclase or increases in intracellular calcium. Since the discovery of NPY, a robust a body of literature has developed around the potential functions of this peptide. While initial findings identified NPY is an important contributor to the regulation of feeding, body weight and blood pressure, more recent work as revealed more subtle functions of this peptide and its potential role in affective disorders, bone formation and cravings. The accompanying twelve reviews detail important developments in our understanding of the functional role of NPY.

Receptor autoradiography as mean to explore the possible functional relevance of neuropeptides: focus on new agonists and antagonists to study natriuretic peptides, neuropeptide Y and calcitonin gene-related peptides.

Over the past 20 years, receptor autoradiography has proven most useful to provide clues as to the role of various families of peptides expressed in the brain. Early on, we used this method to investigate the possible roles of various brain peptides. Natriuretic peptide (NP), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and calcitonin (CT) peptide families are widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system and induced multiple biological effects by activating plasma membrane receptor proteins. The NP family includes atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). The NPY family is composed of at least three peptides NPY, peptide YY (PYY) and the pancreatic polypeptides (PPs). The CT family includes CT, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), amylin (AMY), adrenomedullin (AM) and two newly isolated peptides, intermedin and calcitonin receptor-stimulating peptide (CRSP). Using quantitative receptor autoradiography as well as selective agonists and antagonists for each peptide family, in vivo and in vitro assays revealed complex pharmacological responses and radioligand binding profile. The existence of heterogeneous populations of NP, NPY and CT/CGRP receptors has been confirmed by cloning. Three NP receptors have been cloned. One is a single-transmembrane clearance receptor (NPR-C) while the other two known as CG-A (or NPR-A) and CG-B (or NPR-B) are coupled to guanylate cyclase. Five NPY receptors have been cloned designated as Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), Y(5) and y(6). All NPY receptors belong to the seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors family (GPCRs; subfamily type I). CGRP, AMY and AM receptors are complexes which include a GPCR (the CT receptor or CTR and calcitonin receptor-like receptor or CRLR) and a single-transmembrane domain protein known as receptor-activity-modifying-proteins (RAMPs) as well as an intracellular protein named receptor-component-protein (RCP). We review here tools that are currently available in order to target each NP, NPY and CT/CGRP receptor subtype and establish their respective pathophysiological relevance.

Functional interaction between neuropeptide Y receptors and modulation of calcium channels in the rat hippocampus.

We investigated the functional interaction between neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors using nerve terminals and cultured rat hippocampal neurons, and we evaluated the involvement of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (VGCCs) in NPY receptors-induced inhibition of Ca(2+) influx and glutamate release. The KCl-evoked release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was inhibited by 1 microM NPY and this effect was insensitive to either BIBP3226 (Y1 receptor antagonist) or L-152,804 (Y5 receptor antagonist), but was sensitive to BIIE0246 (Y2 receptor antagonist). We could also pharmacologically dissect the NPY receptors activity by using Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptor agonists ([Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY, NPY13-36, NPY (19-23)-(Gly(1),Ser(3),Gln(4),Thr(6),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34))-pancreatic polypeptide (PP), respectively), and in all the cases we observed that these agonists could inhibited the KCl-induced release of glutamate. However, the selective and specific co-activation of both Y1 and Y2 or Y2 and Y5 receptors resulted in non-additive inhibition, and this effect was prevented in the presence of the Y2 antagonist, but was insensitive to the Y1 or Y5 receptor antagonist. Moreover, as we previously showed for Y1 receptors, we also observed that the activation of Y5 receptors inhibited the glutamate release in the dentate gyrus and CA3 subregion, without significant effect in the CA1 subregion of the hippocampus. The same qualitative results were obtained when we investigated the role of NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors in modulating the changes in [Ca(2+)](i) due to KCl depolarisation in cultured hippocampal neurons. The inhibitory effect of nitrendipine (L-type VGCC blocker) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTx; N-type VGCC blocker) was not potentiated by the simultaneous activation of Y1 or Y2 receptors. Moreover, the exocytotic release of glutamate was inhibited by omega-agatoxin IVA (omega-Aga; P-/Q-type VGCC blocker), and this VGCC blocker did not potentiate Y1, Y2 or Y5 receptor-mediated inhibition of glutamate release. Also, the effect of ionomycin in inducing the exocytotic release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was insensitive to the activation of NPY receptors. In the present paper, we identified a role for NPY Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptors in modulating the exocytotic release of glutamate and the [Ca(2+)](i) changes in the rat hippocampus. In conditions of co-activation, there appears to exist a physiological cross-talk between Y1 and Y2 and also between Y2 and Y5 receptors, in which Y2 receptors play a predominant role. Moreover, we also show that Y1 and Y2 receptors exert their inhibitory action by directly modulating L-, N-, and P-/Q-type VGCCs, whereas the inhibition of glutamate release mediated by the Y5 receptors seems to involve P-/Q-type VGCCs.

Evidence for involvement of neuropeptide Y and melanocortin systems in the hyperphagia of lactation in rats.

Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) systems are upregulated during lactation in rats. Because NPY is central to the hypothalamic control of energy balance, the present studies tested the hypothesis that NPY contributes to the marked hyperphagia during lactation. A 4-day infusion of [D-tyr (27,36), D-thr (32)] NPY (27-36) (D-NPY(27-36)), a peptide analogue of NPY that antagonizes NPY-induced feeding, into the third ventricle at 1 microg/h transiently inhibited nocturnal feeding in nonlactating female rats. However, this antagonist had no effect on nocturnal feeding, but did transiently reduce food intake during the light hours, when infused into the third ventricle at the same dose in lactating females. An essentially similar pattern of results was obtained with chronic infusion into the third ventricle of the anorexigenic peptide alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH, 1 microg/h), in nonlactating and lactating rats. Both D-NPY(27-36) and alpha-MSH transiently reduced nocturnal food intake in lactating rats by approximately 10% when infused at the higher dose of 5 microg/h, and a marked inhibition of approximately 40% of both nocturnal and diurnal feeding was produced by a combined infusion of both at 5 microg/h. These results provide the first pharmacological evidence implicating specific neuromessengers in mediating the hyperphagia of lactation, and suggest that, while an action of NPY may contribute to the increased food intake seen in lactating animals, other systems are also involved. In particular, a reduction in melanocortin signaling during lactation may allow for an increased orexigenic influence of the agouti-related protein (AgRP), which is co-expressed with NPY.

Effects of serotonin, GABA and neuropeptide Y on seabream gonadotropin releasing hormone release in vitro from preoptic-anterior hypothalamus and pituitary of red seabream, Pagrus major.

The effects of serotonin (5-HT), GABA and neuropeptide Y (NPY) on in vitro release of seabream (sb) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) from slices of the preoptic-anterior hypothalamus (P-AH) and pituitary of red seabream were studied. 5-HT, GABA and NPY all stimulated the release of sbGnRH from the P-AH but not from the pituitary of immature red seabream. They also stimulated sbGnRH release from the P-AH with a similar potency during the course of gonadal development. Specific agonists and/or antagonists of 5-HT, GABA and NPY showed that 5-HT and GABA utilize 5-HT(2) and GABAA receptor subtypes, respectively, to mediate their action, and that NPY employs at least NPY(Y1) and NPY(Y2) receptor subtypes to stimulate sbGnRH release. Combinations of different antagonists for 5-HT, GABA and noradrenaline/adrenaline did not block the stimulatory influence of NPY on release of sbGnRH, indicating that the action of NPY on the sbGnRH neuronal system is probably direct.

Nerve injury increases an excitatory action of neuropeptide Y and Y2-agonists on dorsal root ganglion neurons.

Damage to sensory nerves invokes the expression of neuropeptide Y in the cell bodies of sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia. We therefore compared the action of this peptide on control dorsal root ganglia neurons with its action on neurons from animals in which the sciatic nerve had been cut. Neuropeptide Y (0.1-1.0 microM) increased the excitability of 24% of control neurons and its effect was stronger and more cells (56%) were affected after axotomy. Increased excitability was mediated via a Y2-receptor and resulted from attenuation of Ca2+-sensitive K+-conductance(s) secondary to suppression of N-type Ca2+ channel current. Y1-agonists potentiated L-type Ca2+ channel current in control neurons without altering excitability. This Y1-effect was attenuated whereas effects mediated via Y2-receptors were enhanced after axotomy. No evidence was found for involvement of Y4- or Y5-receptor subtypes in the actions of neuropeptide Y either on control or on axotomized dorsal root ganglion neurons. It is concluded that neuropeptide Y increases the excitability of sensory neurons by interacting with a Y2-receptor and thereby decreasing N-type Ca2+ channel current and Ca2+-sensitive K+-conductance(s). When peripheral nerves are damaged, dorsal root ganglion neurons start to express neuropeptide Y and its excitatory Y2-excitatory effects are enhanced. The peptide may therefore contribute to the generation of aberrant sensory activity and perhaps to the etiology of injury-induced neuropathic pain.

Peptide YY derivatives as selective neuropeptide Y/peptide YY Y1 and Y2 agonists devoided of activity for the Y3 receptor sub-type.

Peptide YY derivatives were evaluated for their respective ability to bind and activate the NPY/PYY receptor sub-types (Y1, Y2 and Y3) present in various preparations. The analogue [Leu31,Pro34]PYY demonstrated high (nM) affinity in rat frontoparietal cortical membrane preparations (Y1-enriched tissue) and the rabbit saphenous vein (Y1 in vitro bioassay) but only low affinity in a Y2-enriched preparation (rat hippocampus). In contrast, PYY C-terminal fragments such as PYY3-36 and PYY13-36 were more potent in Y2 than Y1 assays. Interestingly, and in contrast to [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and NPY13-36, the PYY derivatives [Leu31,Pro34]PYY and PYY3-36 were inactive in a purported Y3 bioassay (rat colon). These results suggest that [Leu31,Pro34]PYY and PYY3-36 respectively represent the first selective and potent Y1 and Y2 agonists, devoided of significant affinity/activity for the Y3 receptor class.