[Pain relief after abdominal oncologic surgery. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine]. / Obezbolivanie posle abdominal'nykh onkokhirurgicheskikh vmeshatel'stv. Otsenka effektivnosti i perenosimosti fiksirovannoi kombinatsii diklofenaka i orfenadrina.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the analgesic, opioid-sparing, anti-inflammatory and adverse effects of the diclofenac and orphenadrine (Neodolpasse) fixed combination for analgesia in the postoperative period of surgical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, single-center, prospective, comparative study evaluated two analgesic regimens in 40 cancer patients undergoing various open cavity surgeries, including extensive combined interventions associated with the resection of 3 or more organs. The study was conducted following the transfer from the ICU to the surgical department during the early activation period, within the first two postoperative days. In the first group N (n=20), "Neodolpasse" (a fixed combination of 75 mg Diclofenac and 30 mg Orphenadrine) was administered as an infusion, twice daily. In the second group K (n=20) analgesia was performed with ketoprofen as an intravenous infusion at a daily dose of 200 mg. Patients in both groups received scheduled prolonged epidural analgesia with 0.2% ropivacaine, and when the severity of pain in a visual analogue scale (VAS) increased to more than 40 mm, so an additional dose of 100 mg tramadol was administered intramuscularly. Daily measurments of blood creatinine level and C-reactive protein were taken, postoperative blood loss was accounted for, as well as postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: The comparative analysis of the indicators of pain syndrome severity showed that the patients in group N exhibited a more pronounced analgesic effect, so on the second postoperative day 30% of patients reported moderate pain (from 50 to 60 mm on the pain scale), on the third day - 15%, and by the fourth day - all 100% of patients experienced pain of low intensity. The additional analgesia with tramadol in group N was required twice less than in the comparison group, and such adverse effects as nausea, drowsiness, and weakness were significantly more common in the ketoprofen group. In both groups, the average blood creatinine level did not exceed permissible values, and the C-reactive protein was elevated at all stages of the study but tended to decrease by the fourth day. The analysis of postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale at the time of discharge did not reveal a direct correlation between the occurred complications and the use of NSAIDs. Adverse effects such as anastomotic failure, gastrointestinal complications, or other hemorrhagic manifestations were not recorded. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of Neodolpasse into multimodal analgesic regimens resulted in the most pronounced analgesic and opioid-sparing effects in surgical cancer patients using laparotomy access. Additionally, the application of short courses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with a favorable safety profile.

Modulating the Activity of the Human Organic Cation Transporter 2 Emerges as a Potential Strategy to Mitigate Unwanted Toxicities Associated with Cisplatin Chemotherapy.

Cisplatin (CDDP) stands out as an effective chemotherapeutic agent; however, its application is linked to the development of significant adverse effects, notably nephro- and ototoxicity. The human organic cation transporter 2 (hOCT2), found in abundance in the basolateral membrane domain of renal proximal tubules and the Corti organ, plays a crucial role in the initiation of nephro- and ototoxicity associated with CDDP by facilitating its uptake in kidney and ear cells. Given its limited presence in cancer cells, hOCT2 emerges as a potential druggable target for mitigating unwanted toxicities associated with CDDP. Potential strategies for mitigating CDDP toxicities include competing with the uptake of CDDP by hOCT2 or inhibiting hOCT2 activity through rapid regulation mediated by specific signaling pathways. This study investigated the interaction between the already approved cationic drugs disopyramide, imipramine, and orphenadrine with hOCT2 that is stably expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Regarding disopyramide, its influence on CDDP cellular transport by hOCT2 was further characterized through inductively coupled plasma isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Additionally, its potential protective effects against cellular toxicity induced by CDDP were assessed using a cytotoxicity test. Given that hOCT2 is typically expressed in the basolateral membrane of polarized cells, with specific regulatory mechanisms, this work studied the regulation of hOCT2 that is stably expressed in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells. These cells were cultured in a matrix to induce the formation of cysts, exposing hOCT2 in the basolateral plasma membrane domain, which was freely accessible to experimental solutions. The study specifically tested the regulation of ASP+ uptake by hOCT2 in MDCK cysts through the inhibition of casein kinase II (CKII), calmodulin, or p56lck tyrosine kinase. Furthermore, the impact of this manipulation on the cellular toxicity induced by CDDP was examined using a cytotoxicity test. All three drugs-disopyramide, imipramine, and orphenadrine-demonstrated inhibition of ASP+ uptake, with IC50 values in the micromolar (µM) range. Notably, disopyramide produced a significant reduction in the CDDP cellular toxicity and platinum cellular accumulation when co-incubated with CDDP. The activity of hOCT2 in MDCK cysts experienced a significant down-regulation under inhibition of CKII, calmodulin, or p56lck tyrosine kinase. Interestingly, only the inhibition of p56lck tyrosine kinase demonstrated the capability to protect the cells against CDDP toxicity. In conclusion, certain interventions targeting hOCT2 have demonstrated the ability to reduce CDDP cytotoxicity, at least in vitro. Further investigations in in vivo systems are warranted to ascertain their potential applicability as co-treatments for mitigating undesired toxicities associated with CDDP in patients.

[The use of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine for postoperative pain relief in orthopedic patients]. / Primenenie fiksirovannoi kombinatsii diklofenaka i orfenadrina dlya posleoperatsionnogo obezbolivaniya u ortopedicheskikh bol'nykh.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine for early postoperative pain relief in orthopedic patients following hip prosthetics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study enrolled 65 patients with primary total hip replacement in the setting of spinal bupivacaine anesthesia. Patients were divided into 2 groups - study (39 patients) and control (26 people). The study group underwent Neodolpasse infusion (orphenadrine 30 mg + diclofenac 75 mg) after the end of surgery and morphine infusion in a patient-controlled analgesia (PKA) regimen. The control group underwent morphine monotherapy in the PKA regimen. The intensity of pain syndrome was compared on a visual-analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100, the total amount of morphine administered, the number of bolus requests, the change in kidney function and the side effect were assessed. RESULTS: In the control group, the duration of the intervention was shorter and amounted to 70 [59; 82] minutes, in the study group - 83 [65; 94] minutes (p=0.05). No significant difference was found in the number of bolus requests (32 [22; 38] and 23 [15; 36], p=0.085 and pain intensity 2 and 12 hours after the start of therapy (5 [4; 6] and 3 [2; 4] and 5 [4; 6] and 2 [2; 3] points) in the control group and in the study group. When assessing the intensity of pain syndrome 24 hours after the start of therapy, differences were found in the groups - in the control group 30 [2; 3] mm, in the study group 20 [2; 3] mm (p=0.05). There was no nephrotoxic effect on Neodolpasse. Complications of analgesic therapy in the form of nausea, vomiting, pruritus were recorded in both groups in equal amounts, which is explained by the administration of morphine in both groups. CONCLUSION: 1. The use of a fixed combination of orphenadrine 30 mg + diclofenac 75 mg as part of postoperative pain relief after operations of primary hip prosthetics improves the quality of postoperative pain relief according to the subjective assessment of patients. 2. The use of a fixed combination of orphenadrine 30 mg + diclofenac 75 mg did not lead to the development of side effects and complications.

[The use of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine in the treatment of acute pain syndrome in patients with discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy and lumboischialgia]. / Primenenie fiksirovannoi kombinatsii diklofenaka i orfenadrina v terapii ostrogo bolevogo sindroma u patsientov s diskogennoi poyasnichno-kresttsovoi radikulopatiei i lyumboishialgiei.

Acute pain syndromes caused by discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy and lumboischialgia are not uncommon in clinical practice and characterized by a high risk of becoming chronic. The pathogenetic aspects, features of the clinical picture, existing approaches to conservative treatment of these conditions are analyzed in this paper. Data on the efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine (Neodolpasse) use in the treatment of vertebrogenic pain syndromes based on the NEODOLEX study results are presented, and the authors' own clinical observations are given. Possible reasons for the high efficacy of Neodolpasse in patients with discogenic radiculopathies and nonspecific back and neck pain are discussed.

Artificial intelligence algorithms predict the efficacy of analgesic cocktails prescribed after orthopedic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Mixtures ('cocktails') of various analgesics are more effective in controlling post-operative pain because of potential synergetic effects. Few studies have investigated such effects in large combinations of analgesics and no studies have determined the probabilities of effectiveness. METHODS: We used one-hot encoding of the categorical variables reported pain levels and the administered cocktails (from a total of eight analgesics) and then applied an unsupervised neural network and then the unsupervised DBSCAN algorithm to detect clusters of cocktails. We used Bayesian statistics to classify the effectiveness of these cocktails. RESULTS: Of the 61 different cocktails administered to 750 patients, we found that four combinations of three to four analgesics were by far the most effective. All these cocktails contained Metamizole and Paracetamol; three contained Hydromorphone and two contained Diclofenac and one Diclofenac-Orphenadrine. The ML probability that these cocktails decreased pain levels ranged from 0.965 to 0.981. Choice of a most effective cocktail involves choosing the optimum in a 4-dimensional parameter space: maximum probability of efficacy, confidence interval about maximum probability, fraction of patients with increase in pain levels, relative number of patients with successful pain level decrease. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that administering one analgesic or at most two is not effective. We found no statistical indicators that interactions between analgesics in the most effective cocktails decreased their effectiveness. Pairs of most effective cocktails differed by the addition of only one analgesic (Diclofenac-Orphenadrine for one pair and Hydromorphone for the other). We conclude that the listed cocktails are to be recommended.

Intravenous diclofenac and orphenadrine for the treatment of postoperative pain after remifentanil-based anesthesia : A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative intravenous diclofenac reduces patient opioid demand and is commonly used in surgical units. Orphenadrine is mainly used in combination with diclofenac for musculoskeletal injuries and postoperative pain control. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac-orphenadrine, diclofenac alone and saline. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center clinical study investigating the opioid-sparing effect of a combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine versus diclofenac alone versus isotonic saline solution. Initially 72 patients were included and received total intravenous anesthesia during cruciate ligament surgery. All patients were postoperatively treated with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device containing hydromorphone. Pharmacological safety was assessed by laboratory parameters, vital signs, and delirium detection scores. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in cumulative dose of PCA analgesics required after 24 h postsurgery, with 5.90 mg (SD ± 2.90 mg) in the placebo group, 5.73 mg (SD ± 4.75 mg) in the diclofenac group, and 4.13 mg (SD ± 2.57 mg) in the diclofenac-orphenadrine group. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups in cumulative dose of PCA analgesics required 2 h postsurgery (n = 65). Mean dose of hydromorphone required after 2 h was 1.54 mg (SD ± 0.57 mg) in the placebo group, 1.56 mg (SD ± 1.19 mg) in the diclofenac-only group, and 1.37 mg (SD ± 0.78 mg) in the diclofenac-orphenadrine group. However, when comparing the diclofenac-orphenadrine group and the diclofenac group combined to placebo there was a significant reduction in PCA usage in the first 24 h postsurgery. In total, there were 25 adverse events reported, none of which were rated as severe. CONCLUSION: Orphenadrine-diclofenac failed to significantly reduce postoperative opioid requirements. However, in an exploratory post hoc analysis the diclofenac-orphenadrine and the diclofenac group combined versus placebo showed a tendency to reduce opioid demand in postoperative pain control. Further research is required to determine the value of orphenadrine as an adjuvant in a multimodal approach for postoperative pain management.

[Analgesic and opioid-sparing effects of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine in the early postoperative period in cardiac surgery patients]. / Anal'geticheskii i opioidsberegayushchii effekty fiksirovannoi kombinatsii diklofenaka i orfenadrina v rannem posleoperatsionnom periode u kardiokhirurgicheskikh bol'nykh.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effectiveness of a multimodal scheme of postoperative analgesia based on a fixed combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac against the background of patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in the early postoperative period in cardiac surgery patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, comparative study evaluated two analgesic regimens. In 20 patients (group 1), «Neodolpasse¼ (a fixed combination of 30 mg Orphenadrine and 75 mg Diclofenac) was administered immediately after trachea extubation. The second injection was performed at VAS>50 mm not earlier than 12 hours after the first one. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was started 2 hours after extubation, 20 patients of group 2 who were used PCA with Morphine as monotherapy. The intensity of pain taking into account the motor activity of patients was assessed a 100 mm visual-analog scale (VAS), as an additional objective criterion for the effectiveness of analgesia, the method of incentive spirometry was used. RESULTS: A decrease in the severity of pain according to VAS from an average of 41 to 19 mm (p=0.036) was achieved already by the 1st hour from the start of Neodolpasse infusion, and in 80% of patients this effect persisted for 24 hours. 2 patients (10%) needed the administration of the 2nd dose after 12 hours. The infusion of Morphine was started 2 hours after extubation, a significant decrease in pain intensity was noted only at 4th hour, a significant decrease in pain intensity was noted only by 4 hours, and significant differences in the severity of pain in the comparison groups persisted at almost all stages of the study. The analgesic effect of the combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac had a positive effect on the function of respiration system with an increase in MILC by 1.5 times from the beginning of the study. In group 2, the observed adverse effects were associated with the use of Morphine and depended on its dose. No adverse effects of Neodolpasse were noted. The total 24 hour consumption of Morphine at PCA averaged 22.6 mg, and in the Neodolpasse group - 9.35 mg (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There were demonstrated high analgesic efficacy, safety and significant opioid-sparing effect of a fixed combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery patients.

[Efficiency and safety of a fixed combination of Orphenadrine and Diclofenac for postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgery patients]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' ispol'zovaniya fiksirovannoi kombinatsii orfenadrina i diklofenaka dlya posleoperatsionnoi analgezii u kardiokhirurgicheskikh bol'nykh.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the use of a fixed combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac for analgesia in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were two analgesia regimens evaluated in a retrospective comparative study. In 23 patients (group 1), Neodolpasse (a fixed combination of 30 mg orphenadrine and 75 mg diclofenac) was administered immediately after trachea extubation. When the severity of pain in VAS increased to more than 50 mm, so 20 mg trimeperidine was administered. In group 2 of 20 patients analgesia in group 2 was performed with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with Promedol (trimeperidine) as monotherapy. The intensity of pain was assessed a 100 mm visual-analog scale (VAS) and 5-channel verbal scale (VS) for assessment the severity of the pain syndrome during the patient's moving activity. RESULTS: A decrease in the severity of the pain syndrome according to VAS from 68.31 to 21.96 mm (p<0.001) was achieved by the first hour after the start of the infusion of Neodolpasse persisted for 24 hours of 65% patients. 4 patients (35%) needed the administration of the 2nd dose after 12 hours. The infusion of trimeperidine was started 2 hours after extubation, a significant decrease in pain intensity was noted only at 6th hour, and further differences in the severity of pain in the comparative groups did not significantly differ. In group 2, the observed adverse effects were associated with the use of trimeperidine and depended on its dose. No adverse effects of Neodolpasse were noted. In the Neodolpasse group no adverse effects of the treatment was noted. The total 24 hour consumption of trimeperidine at PCA averaged 72.3 mg, and in the Neodolpasse group - 6.96 mg (p=0.00042). CONCLUSION: There were demonstrated safety, high analgesic efficacy and significant opioid-sparing effect of a fixed combination of Orphenadrine and Diclofenac in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery patients within the framework of the inclusion and exclusion criteria accepted in the study.

Intravenous ibuprofen versus diclofenac plus orphenadrine in orthognathic surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ibuprofen versus diclofenac plus orphenadrine on postoperative pain in orthognathic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent orthognathic surgery were randomized into two groups to receive intravenously either 600 mg of ibuprofen (I-group) or 75 mg diclofenac plus 30 mg orphenadrine (D-group), both of which were given twice daily. Additionally, both groups were given metamizole 500 mg. Rescue pain medication consisted of acetaminophen 1000 mg and piritramide 7.5 mg as needed. To assess the pain intensity, the primary end point was the numeric rating scale (NRS) recorded over the course of the hospital stay three times daily for 3 days. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were enrolled (age range, 18 to 61 years) between May 2019 and November 2020. Forty-eight bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) and 51 bimaxillary osteotomies (BIMAX) were performed. Surgical subgroup analysis found a significant higher mean NRS (2.73 vs.1.23) in the BIMAX D-group vs. I-group (p = 0.015) on the third postoperative day. Additionally, as the patient's body mass index (BMI) increased, the mean NRS (r = 0.517, p = 0.001) also increased. No differences were found between age, gender, length of hospital stay, weight, operating times, number of patients with complete pain relief, acetaminophen or piritramide intake, and NRS values. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that ibuprofen administration and lower BMI were associated with less pain for patients who underwent bimaxillary osteotomy on the third postoperative day. Therefore, surgeons may prefer ibuprofen for more effective pain relief after orthognathic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ibuprofen differs from diclofenac plus orphenadrine in class and is a powerful analgetic after orthognathic surgery.

Development and Validation of Chromatographic Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Paracetamol, Orphenadrine Citrate and Caffeine in Presence of P-aminophenol; Quantification of P-aminophenol Nephrotoxic Impurity Using LC-MS/MS.

Three chromatographic methods were developed, optimized and validated for Paracetamol (PAR), Orphenadrine citrate (Or.cit) and Caffeine (CAF) determination in their mixture and in presence of PAR toxic impurity; P-aminophenol (PAP) in tablets. The first method is based on a thin layer chromatography combined with densitometry. Separation was achieved using silica gel 60 F254 TLC plates and dichloromethane:methanol:acetone:glacial acetic acid (9:1:0.5:0.3, v/v/v) as a developing system at 230 nm. The second method is based on high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The proposed compounds are separated on a reversed phase C18 analytical column using phosphate buffer (pH 9; 0.05 M) and methanol (80:20, v/v) at 1.2 mL/min. Linear regressions are obtained in the range of 1-500 µg/mL, 25-1000 µg/mL and 1-400 µg/mL for PAR, Or.cit and CAF, respectively. Quantification of the toxic PAP is carried out using LC-MS-MS by electrospray ionization in the positive mode using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. The limit of quantification for PAP is 1 ng/mL. All methods are validated according to the ICH guidelines and successfully applied to determine PAR, Or.cit, CAF and PAP in pure powder and in combined tablets dosage form without interference from excipients.

Liver tumor promoting effect of orphenadrine in rats and its possible mechanism of action including CAR activation and oxidative stress.

Orphenadrine (ORPH), an anticholinergic agent, is a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B inducer. CYP2B inducers are known to have liver tumor-promoting effects in rats. In this study, we performed a rat two-stage liver carcinogenesis bioassay to examine the tumor-promoting effect of ORPH and to clarify its possible mechanism of action. Male rats were given a single intraperitoneal injection of N-diethylnitrosamine (DEN) as an initiation treatment. Two weeks after DEN administration, rats were fed a diet containing ORPH (0, 750, or 1,500 ppm) for 6 weeks. One week after the ORPH-administration rats were subjected to two-thirds partial hepatectomy for the acceleration of hepatocellular proliferation. The number and area of glutathione S-transferase placental form-positive foci significantly increased in the DEN-ORPH groups. Real-time RT-PCR revealed increased mRNA expression levels of Cyp2b1/2, Mrp2 and Cyclin D1 in the DEN-ORPH groups and of Gpx2 and Gstm3 in the DEN-High ORPH group. Microsomal reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and oxidative stress markers such as thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine were increased in the DEN-High ORPH group. Immunohistochemically, constitutively active/androstane receptor (CAR) were clearly localized in the nuclei of hepatocytes in the DEN-ORPH groups. These results suggest that ORPH causes nuclear translocation of CAR resulting in the induction of the liver tumor-promoting activity. Furthermore, oxidative stress resulting from ROS production is also involved in the liver tumor-promoting activity of ORPH.

Enhanced liver tumor promotion activity in rats subjected to combined administration of phenobarbital and orphenadrine.

Phenobarbital (PB) and orphenadrine (ORPH) are cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B inducers and have liver tumor-promoting effects in rats. In this study, we performed a rat two-stage liver carcinogenesis bioassay to examine the tumor-promoting effect of PB and ORPH co-administration. Twelve male rats per group were given an intraperitoneal injection of N-diethylnitrosamine (DEN) for initiation. Two-week after DEN administration, rats were given PB (60 or 120 ppm in drinking water), ORPH (750 or 1,500 ppm in diet) or 60 ppm PB+750 ppm ORPH for 6-week. One-week after the PB/ORPH treatment, all rats were subjected to two-thirds partial hepatectomy. To evaluate the effect of the combined administration, we used two statistical models: a heteroadditive model and an isoadditive model. In the heteroadditive model, the net values of the number and area of glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P) positive foci, Cyp2b1/2, Gstm3 and Gpx2 mRNA levels, microsomal reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances level in the PB+ORPH group were significantly higher than the sum of the net values of those in the Low PB and Low ORPH groups. In the isoadditive model, the average values of the area of GST-P positive foci and PCNA positive hepatocyte ratio and Gstm3 mRNA level in the PB+ORPH group were significantly higher than the average values of those in the High PB and High ORPH groups. These results suggest that PB and ORPH co-administration causes synergistic effects in liver tumor-promoting activity in rats resulting from oxidative stress due to enhanced microsomal ROS production.

Opiate sparing effect of fixed combination of diclophenac and orphenadrine after unilateral total hip arthroplasty: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-centre clinical trial.

Multimodal pain management combines analgesics to improve analgesia and reduce side effects. This study investigates the fixed combination of diclophenac and orphenadrin (Neodolpasse(®) Infusion Solution) in patients after unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre clinical study enrolled 120 patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Isotonic saline was infused as placebo. The primary efficacy goal was defined as reduction of PCA analgesics used over the first 24 h post-surgery. The study used a three-stage group sequential test design with two interim analyses. Analgesia was monitored by visual analogue scale and verbal rating. Infusion of the Neodolpasse(®) Infusion Solution resulted in a significant reduction in the PCA analgesic requirements by approximately 30% (38.7 ± 21.3 mg vs. 55.9 ± 31.1 mg; p = 0.0004) while maintaining adequate analgesia and patient safety. This study demonstrates that Neodolpasse(®) Infusion Solution significantly reduces PCA analgesic requirements without compromising analgesic effectiveness and safety in THA patients.

Determination of orphenadrine plasma levels using HPLC with diode array detection and a novel solid-phase extraction procedure in psychiatric patients.

Orphenadrine is an antimuscarinic agent mainly used for the treatment of parkinsonism and to alleviate the neuroleptic syndrome induced by antipsychotic drugs. A new, rapid analytical method, based on liquid chromatography with diode array detection (DAD), has been developed and applied to the determination of orphenadrine in plasma of schizophrenic patients for therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicological purposes. The chromatographic separation was performed on a pentafluorophenyl reversed phase column with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile-phosphate buffer mixture. DAD detection was carried out at 220 nm. A careful and rapid solid-phase extraction procedure on cyanopropyl cartridges was chosen for plasma sample purification and pre-concentration obtaining good extraction yield values for the analyte (>96.0%). The assays showed a linear response for orphenadrine (30-1000 ng mL(-1)). The method is also precise and selective. Thus, the method developed seems to be suitable for routine analysis of orphenadrine in psychiatric patients. Moreover, it was applied to plasma samples from a psychotic patient who had tried to poison himself with 1000 mg of orphenadrine and was undergoing polypharmacy.

Anticholinergic antiparkinson drug orphenadrine inhibits HERG channels: block attenuation by mutations of the pore residues Y652 or F656.

The anticholinergic antiparkinson drug orphenadrine is an antagonist at central and peripheral muscarinic receptors. Orphenadrine intake has recently been linked to QT prolongation and Torsade-de-Pointes tachycardia. So far, inhibitory effects on I (Kr) or cloned HERG channels have not been examined. HERG channels were heterologously expressed in a HEK 293 cell line and in Xenopus oocytes and HERG current was measured using the whole cell patch clamp and the double electrode voltage clamp technique. Orphenadrine inhibits cloned HERG channels in a concentration dependent manner, yielding an IC(50) of 0.85 microM in HEK cells. Onset of block is fast and reversible upon washout. Orphenadrine does not alter the half-maximal activation voltage of HERG channels. There is no shift of the half-maximal steady-state-inactivation voltage. Time constants of direct channel inactivation are not altered significantly and there is no use-dependence of block. HERG blockade is attenuated significantly in mutant channels lacking either of the aromatic pore residues Y652 and F656. In conclusion, we show that the anticholinergic agent orphenadrine is an antagonist at HERG channels. These results provide a novel molecular basis for the reported proarrhythmic side effects of orphenadrine.

Efficacy and safety of combined piroxicam, dexamethasone, orphenadrine, and cyanocobalamin treatment in mandibular molar surgery.

Third molar extraction is a common procedure frequently accompanied by moderate or severe pain, and involves sufficient numbers of patients to make studies relatively easy to perform. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic combination of 10 mg piroxicam, 1 mg dexamethasone, 35 mg orphenadrine citrate, and 2.5 mg cyanocobalamin (Rheumazin) when compared with 20 mg piroxicam alone (Feldene) in mandibular third molar surgery. Eighty patients scheduled for removal of the third molar were included in this randomized and double-blind study. They received (vo) Rheumazin or Feldene 30 min after tooth extraction and once daily for 4 consecutive days. Pain was determined by a visual analogue scale and by the need for escape analgesia (paracetamol). Facial swelling was evaluated with a measuring tape and adverse effects and patient satisfaction were recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in facial swelling between Rheumazin and Feldene (control group). Both drugs were equally effective in the control of pain, with Rheumazin displaying less adverse effects than Feldene. Therefore, Rheumazin appears to provide a better risk/benefit ratio in the mandibular molar surgery. Since the side effects resulting from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration are a severe limitation to the routine use of these drugs in clinical practice, our results suggest that Rheumazin can be a good choice for third molar removal treatment.

Efficacy and safety of combined piroxicam, dexamethasone, orphenadrine, and cyanocobalamin treatment in mandibular molar surgery

Third molar extraction is a common procedure frequently accompanied by moderate or severe pain, and involves sufficient numbers of patients to make studies relatively easy to perform. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic combination of 10 mg piroxicam, 1 mg dexamethasone, 35 mg orphenadrine citrate, and 2.5 mg cyanocobalamin (Rheumazin®) when compared with 20 mg piroxicam alone (Feldene®) in mandibular third molar surgery. Eighty patients scheduled for removal of the third molar were included in this randomized and double-blind study. They received (vo) Rheumazin or Feldene 30 min after tooth extraction and once daily for 4 consecutive days. Pain was determined by a visual analogue scale and by the need for escape analgesia (paracetamol). Facial swelling was evaluated with a measuring tape and adverse effects and patient satisfaction were recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in facial swelling between Rheumazin and Feldene (control group). Both drugs were equally effective in the control of pain, with Rheumazin displaying less adverse effects than Feldene. Therefore, Rheumazin appears to provide a better risk/benefit ratio in the mandibular molar surgery. Since the side effects resulting from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration are a severe limitation to the routine use of these drugs in clinical practice, our results suggest that Rheumazin can be a good choice for third molar removal treatment.

[Diclofenac 75mg. and 30 mg. orfenadine (Neodolpasse) versus placebo and piroxicam in postoperative analgesia after arthroscopy]. / Diklofenak 75 mg s orfenadinem 30 mg (NEODOLPASSE) versus placebo a piroxikam v pooperacní analgezii u artroskopií.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Arthroscopy is often performed in an out-patient department or as one-day surgery. Opioids often used as postoperative analgesics may have unwanted side effects that may postpone the patient's discharge from hospital. This study was designed to evaluate a substitute for the most frequently used opioid pethidine. For pain relief, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended, but they offer a limited choice for parenteral administration. We used a new agent (Neodolpasse) based on diclophenac and orphenadine, and compared its efficacy with piroxicam and placebo. METHODS: A total of 119 patients scheduled for knee joint arthroscopy were included in this prospective study. In a randomized, double-blind manner, they received piroxicam (P), Neodolpasse (combining 75 mg diclophenac and 30 mg orphenadine; N) or placebo (C). The number of patients in groups P, N and C were 44, 35 and 40, respectively. The effect of therapy was evaluated on the basis of the following criteria: duration of post-operative analgesia until a request for another analgesic, pain intensity (0-10 VAS), side effects and the patient's satisfaction with analgesia. The efficacy was evaluated for 24 hours after arthroscopy; premedication and analgesia induction and administration followed the same anesthetic protocol in all groups. The ethic committee approved the study and patients gave their informed consent. The results were statistically evaluated using the ANOVA analysis of variance completed by a multiple comparison of levels of significance according to Bonferroni. The presence of side and unwanted effects was analyzed by the chi-square of Fisher's exact test. A p value les than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the number of patients not requiring further analgesic medication after arthroscopy (P 52.3% vs. C (11.7%) p < 0.05, N (68.6%) vs. C p < 0.001), lower average postoperative pain (0 to 10-point scale, P 2.4 vs. C 2.9 p < 0.05, N 1.5 vs. C p < 0.05) and fewer side effects (N vs. both P and C, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The combination of diclophenac with orphenadine for intravenous application has only recently been available in the Czech Republic. The addition of a central muscle relaxant to a peripheral analgesic has a better effect than diclophenac alone. This may also account for a longer duration of analgesia in comparison with piroxicam reported to have significantly longer analgesic effects. The new medication also had fewer side effects. It was interesting to record that even the patients who had more pain and shorter postoperative analgesia were satisfied with the therapy provided. CONCLUSIONS: The main result of this study is the finding that Neodolpasse significantly reduces the intensity of postoperative pain and increases the duration of postoperative analgesia after knee joint arthroscopy.

Anthropometric and pharmacotherapeutic variables on acute emesis induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of anthropometric and pharmacotherapeutic variables on acute emesis induced by cisplatin-containing regimens with dosages > or =50 mg x m(-2). METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, noncontrolled study was performed to analyze acute vomiting during the first 24 hours in patients treated in a Spanish hospital. The patients received an intravenous combination of drugs (2 doses of metoclopramide 3 mg/kg, dexamethasone 20 mg) as first-choice antiemetic therapy. Intravenous ondansetron 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg served as an alternative regimen in patients <30 years old with a history of extrapyramidal manifestations or emesis in previous cycles. Therapeutic failure was used as a dependent variable, defined as three or more vomiting episodes documented by the patients. Other variables were the chemotherapeutic regimen; antiemetic regimen; patient gender, age, weight, and height; and cycle number. The reference logistic model and two reduced-models derived from the latter were designed. The logistic models were subsequently validated by means of receiving operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: A total of 319 cycles involving 106 patients were studied. The metoclopramide regimen was administered in 66% of the cycles. The therapeutic failure rate was 21% for the metoclopramide regimen and 32% for the ondansetron treatment. The logistic model developed identified the type of chemotherapeutic regimen provided as the most significant prognostic variable (p < 0.0001). Patient weight (odds ratio 1.64) and height (odds ratio 1.28) were identified as prognostic factors related with therapeutic failure. CONCLUSIONS: The type of chemotherapeutic regimen administered and the anthropometric characteristics of the patients exert a clear conditioning effect on risks associated with therapeutic failure against acute emesis following high-dose cisplatin therapy. Such anthropometric parameters have not been previously identified as prognostic factors.