Surgical Treatment of a Borderline Skeletal Class III Patient: an Interdisciplinary Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Class III malocclusion is considered the most challenging discrepancies in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. It is often difficult to classify borderline cases as surgical or non-surgical. The following case report is of a borderline Class III case with several missing maxillary premolars treated via an interdisciplinary approach. AIM: This clinical case highlights the importance of meticulous diagnosis to obtain optimal results in borderline Class III cases. The significance of an interdisciplinary approach in complex adult orthodontic cases was also discussed. CASE REPORT: Given the complexity of the case, the treatment required a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach with the intervention of multiple specialties including periodontics, prosthodontics, orthodontics, oral surgery and maxillofacial surgery. The presurgical orthodontic stage was achieved in preparation for LeFort I maxillary advancement. Third molars extractions along with implant placement were implemented. Finally, crown placement and connective tissue graft were completed to achieve an optimal result. Total treatment time was 1.7 years (20 months). Patient's profile and facial appearance were dramatically enhanced, and a stable functional Class II occlusion was attained despite the preexisting skeletal Class III. CONCLUSION: Borderline adult Class III cases require a delicate diagnostic approach to be able to distinguish a surgical from a non-surgical approach. Complex adult orthodontic cases require a diplomatic interdisciplinary approach from all required specialties in order to attain the most favorable results.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of The Effects of Orthodontic or Functional Orthopaedic Treatment on Masseter Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This review investigated the effects of orthodontic or functional orthopedic therapy on masseter muscle thickness through the use of ultrasonography (US) in growing subjects when compared with untreated subjects. Materials and Methods: This review systematically assessed studies that investigated growing subjects undergoing orthopedic therapy for the correction of malocclusion of vertical, sagittal and transversal plane. Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched up to February 2019, including available RCTs and CCTs, without language restrictions. The primary outcome was the effect of orthopedic or functional treatment on masseter muscle thickness. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale with the aim of defining their methodological quality. A random-effects meta-analysis analyzing mean differences with 95% confidence intervals was used for quantitative analysis. Results: The search retrieved 749 titles, but the studies selection resulted in a final sample of 5 CCTs. The studies retrieved data from 233 children (age range: 5-22 years) and were conducted at university dental clinics. Children were treated for Class II malocclusion, increased vertical dimension or lateral cross-bite variably with rapid or slow maxillary expansion, twin block, bite block, mandibular activators, quad helix, alone or in combination. Risk of bias was assessed as medium for three studies, low for one and high for another. The meta-analysis determined that at the end of orthopedic or functional treatment masseter muscle thickness, measured through the use of US, is significantly reduced (MD -0.79 mm; 95% CI -1.28 to -0.31). The reduction in muscle thickness, therefore, could be considered an indicator for the evaluation of the success of therapy with orthodontic appliances. Conclusions: Although the meta-analysis revealed that US could be considered a less invasive and effective method to evaluate the masseter muscle thickness, single-blinded RCTs, are required to confirm US reliability in this field of application. This review was registered on PROSPERO with the following registration number: CRD42018068402.

[The smile: a challenge in the treatment of class III]. / Le sourire : un enjeu dans la décision thérapeutique des classes III.

INTRODUCTION: The smile poses a challenge in the treatment of class III. Untreated, the class III patient presents excessive maxillary torque and a predominant display of the mandibular incisors, a sign that becomes more visible with age. Functional orthopedics restores the aesthetic appearance of the smile by maxillary protraction (sometimes temporarily because 20% of cases will still need surgery). Depending on the initial severity of the case (-4.5 mm AoBo would be the threshold value), the options are compensation or surgical correction. In both cases, the profile is improved but without normalising the cephalometric values. In recent years, the number of published cases treated by compensations (often using skeletal anchorage) has multiplied with broader indications, particularly for Asian patients in whom Le Fort I surgery gives questionable aesthetic results. Attention must be focused on the occlusal plane rotation which alters the smile by displaying the mandibular incisors. Nevertheless, surgery can handle the most severe cases with a greater degree of improvement. AIM: The aim of this article is to determine the cephalometric cut-off values for an acceptable smile in Class III patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a search on Pubmed using the following keywords: Class III, anterior cross bite, smile, camouflage, orthognathic surgery; then secondarily, using references supplied by the articles found. We then analysed the data. RESULTS: The ortho-surgical protocol associated with extractions of maxillary first premolars appears to be the way to obtain the best results in terms of the smile (versus surgery without extractions and versus orthodontic compensations) because it is, in fact, the only way to restore the normal position and torque of the maxillary incisors, thus increasing their display during smiling.

Severity and outcome assessments of patients undertaking surgical orthodontic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Combined orthognathic-orthodontic treatment can be lengthy and expensive. It is therefore important to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed treatment and the likely outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To determine the demographic and surgical details of patients who received orthognathic-orthodontic treatment at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand, and to assess treatment using the Severity and Outcome Index (SOI). METHODS: An observational and retrospective study was conducted of patients who received surgical orthodontic treatment between 2005 and 2012 at Christchurch Hospital. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of 93 patients were evaluated. Seven cephalometric parameters were assessed using the Severity and Outcome Index. A severity score ranged from 0 for the most severe to 7 for the least severe, while the outcome score ranged from 0 for the worst to 7 for the best outcome. RESULTS: Class II patients had a severity score of 3.4 and the best outcome score of 6.2. Class III patients had a severity score of 3.3 and an outcome score of 6.1. Patients with an anterior open bite (AOB) had the worst severity score of 3.0, and the worst outcome score of 5.9. The overall treatment outcome scores for all groups were statistically significantly greater than the severity scores, which increased from 3.4 to 6.1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Favourable outcomes were achieved for a group of patients with a high need for treatment. Christchurch Hospital appeared to be treating cases of increased severity and gained better treatment outcomes when compared with a United Kingdom (UK) national audit.

Guidelines for periodontal care and follow-up during orthodontic treatment in adolescents and young adults

Aggressive periodontitis is characterized by non-contributory medical history, rapid attachment loss and bone destruction and familial aggregation of cases. Aggressive periodontitis (both localized and generalized) is usually diagnosed in a young population. This is frequently the age that an orthodontic care is provided to this population. The aim of the present paper is to draw guidelines for periodontal evaluation and monitoring prior to and during active orthodontic treatment. Strict adherence to these guidelines as a routine protocol for periodontal examination prior, during and following orthodontic treatment may dramatically decrease the severity and improve the prognosis of patients with aggressive periodontitis in orthodontic clinics.

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index is commonly used to evaluate occlusal outcomes after orthodontic treatment. We compared the PAR outcomes of 40 consecutively treated orthodontic patients and 40 orthognathic patients to evaluate the standard of care given. A patient-centred questionnaire was used to examine patients' perceptions of the benefits of orthognathic treatment. PAR scores of orthodontic and orthognathic patients improved by a mean of 77% and 74%, respectively, after treatment indicating that excellent to good occlusal results were achieved for both groups. A high quality occlusal outcome is important for all patients as good intercuspation at the end of treatment is thought to improve stability. Most orthognathic patients reported improvements in their dental and facial appearance and thought that the treatment had been beneficial.

Safe, efficient, and cost-effective orthognathic surgery in the outpatient setting.

There has been a dramatic decline in the number of orthognathic surgery cases over the past 15 to 20 years. This decrease is a result of several compounding factors including decreasing coverage by major medical insurance companies and increasing health care costs. The difficulty associated with making orthognathic surgery financially practical has turned the interest of many oral and maxillofacial surgeons away from orthognathic procedures. The combination of these factors has resulted in decreased availability of surgeons participating in the correction of dentofacial deformities and has forced orthodontists and patients, without surgical correction as an option, to settle for less-than-ideal treatment results. To reverse this trend and make surgery more affordable and available, surgeons must work to make surgical treatment more acceptable to patients. This can be accomplished in several ways. First, the oral and maxillofacial surgery profession must reinforce the importance and value of orthognathic surgery to insurance providers, patients, and referring clinicians, as well as to surgeons within our own specialty. Alternative methods for providing high-quality surgical services at a reasonable cost must be explored including providing options for cost-effective outpatient surgical care, making better arrangements for financial assistance, and exploring options to obtain coverage from third-party providers. Outpatient surgery in facilities that can substantially reduce cost can be an effective way of providing quality treatment that is affordable to patients. Efficient, safe, and effective outpatient orthognathic surgery will help patients benefit from this valuable service.

What are the occlusal outcomes for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients? A national project in the UK.

AIM: This national project assessed the orthodontic outcome for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients in the UK. METHOD: Six consecutively treated fixed appliance cases where orthognathic surgery was not undertaken were assessed using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index on orthodontic study models. These cases were submitted by NHS consultant orthodontists undertaking treatment on patients with cleft lip and/or palate. SETTING: UK NHS consultant-led hospital service. RESULTS: The mean reduction in PAR score was 69% + or - 22. The mean start PAR score was 41 + or - 11. The mean end of treatment PAR was 12 + or - 9. The proportion of cases where the score was worse or no different was 7.5%. CONCLUSION: The mean percentage PAR reduction compares well with other national projects looking at outcome from patients treated in the hospital service. The mean PAR reduction could be used as a benchmark for outcome in UCLP orthodontic treatments in future audit projects and the annual consultant appraisal process.

Development of a treatment outcome standard as a result of a clinical audit of the outcome of fixed appliance therapy undertaken by hospital-based consultant orthodontists in the UK.

Bristol's much-publicised cardiac surgery problems and subsequent enquiry(1) have drawn attention to the need for audit of treatment outcomes throughout all hospital specialties. Patient anxiety, government policy and the desire of the professions to re-establish public confidence, have further encouraged changes to the system. For medical and dental specialties, such challenges have already been taken up by the Royal Colleges with the establishment of clinical effectiveness committees. Hospitals have modified their procedures and, for consultants, yearly appraisal is already a reality. The Orthodontic Clinical Effectiveness Working Party of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (now the Clinical Effectiveness Committee of the British Orthodontic Society) set up this audit to measure the outcome of fixed appliance treatment and to establish a benchmark for the standard of treatment to be expected from a consultant orthodontist. This paper describes how the audit was carried out, presents the findings and goes on to discuss some of the wider issues involved in audit, clinical governance and appraisal. The Consultant Orthodontists Group of the British Orthodontic Society funded this audit and the results and data set of dental casts remain their property.

Consistency of patient classification in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

The purpose of this study was to examine diagnosis and treatment planning categorizations used by experienced orthodontists. Thirty-nine clinicians were asked to evaluate six test cases and formulate a diagnosis and treatment plan for each. The information provided was categorized using a problem-oriented classification. The results indicate little agreement exists in diagnostic subcategories, such as molar relationship, degree of crowding, or the nature of skeletal discrepancies. There was also little agreement regarding some treatment strategies, such as extraction of teeth, the use of orthopedic appliances, or the use of surgery. A need exists for better definitions of diagnostic criteria and appropriate treatment options.

An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases.

In a retrospective study, 90 American Board of Orthodontic (ABO) cases were evaluated for treatment outcome. Changes in occlusion, cephalometric skeletal and dental variables, soft tissue variables, and root resorption were evaluated. The occlusions of completed ABO cases were compared with 147 naturally occurring good-to-excellent occlusions from the Andrews Foundation for Education and Research, using the Ideal Tooth Relationship Index (ITRI). Cephalometric variables were evaluated in relation to an "acceptable range" based on established standards. Photographs were evaluated for lip posture at rest and at closure, and the incidence and the severity of root resorption of maxillary and mandibular teeth excluding second molars were evaluated from panoramic radiographs. After treatment, occlusions of ABO cases scored significantly higher overall and for all ITRI segments except the anterior interarch segment when compared with Andrew's sample. In all the ABO cases, ideal overjet and overbite were attained. Cephalometrically, the mandibular plane and the Y-axis angle showed no significant change as a result of treatment. However, skeletal dysplasia (ANB) and skeletal convexity (Na-A-Po) showed improvement. Dentally, the maxillary incisor position and inclination, the interincisal angle, and the lower incisor position ended within the acceptable range, whereas the lower incisors were proclined. Soft tissue variables also improved, lip balance and harmony, closure at rest, and closure without strain all improved. The nasolabial angle showed little change. Most of the root resorption was minor in nature and involved the maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors. In conclusion, the ABO cases were well treated and showed marked improvement in occlusion, cephalometric, and soft tissue changes, although experiencing minor iatrogenic effects.

A critical assessment of orthodontic standards in England and Wales (1990-1991) in relation to changes in prior approval.

Targeting, use of appliances, and standards of outcome for General Dental Service orthodontic cases collected between 1990 and 1991 were compared with a sample of cases from an earlier study, collected between 1987 and 1988, using the PAR index and IOTN. Comparisons are made generally and in relation to the changes in prior approval regulations for cases started since October 1987. More lower-need cases were treated, but there were no more "unnecessary' treatments and there has been a limited improvement in outcomes, as assessed by the indices, associated with increased use of fixed appliances since 1987. Prior approval appeared to give no tangible benefits in terms of levels of unnecessary treatment or quality of outcome.

Quality assurance in orthodontic radiography.

The implementation of a Quality Assurance (QA) programme in orthodontic radiography is designed to improve the quality of the resultant radiographs and to reduce the number of repeat exposures. This is particularly desirable in orthodontic practice where the majority of patients are young and therefore more at risk from the detrimental effects of X-rays. A programme is described and QA tests are given that may be applied in the surgery. Particular emphasis is placed on QA measures for extraoral radiography, since this is frequently undertaken in the treatment of the orthodontic patient.

Os caninos e os seus envolvimentos no equilíbrio estético, tracionamento de caninos näo irrompidos: uma controvérsia / Envolvment of canines in esthetical equilibrium, traction of impaired canines: a controversy

Os autores demonstram a importância deste controvertido assunto ser revisado, visando näo preconizar um tratamento mas, sim, discutir os trabalhos e as experiências de vários pesquisadores para que cada profissional possa estabelecer o seu modo de atuaçäo