Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Four-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid excision (FCA) and proximal row carpal resection (PRC) are frequently performed in wrists with post-traumatic Scaphoid Non- Union Advanced Collapse (SNAC)/Scapho-Lunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two procedures. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included all patients who had PRC or FCA between January 1st, 2009 and January 1st, 2019 and who were followed up. Follow-up included: mobility (radial deviation, ulnar deviation, flexion, extension), strength (grip test, pinch test), function (QuickDash, patient-rated wrist evaluation [PRWE]), subjective mobility, and global satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Among 25 patients included, 11 had PRC and 14 had FCA with a mean follow-up of 69.5 months [12-132]. Radial deviation was 18° versus 14° (p = 0.7), ulnar deviation was 21° versus 22° (p = 0.15), flexion was 39° versus 30° (p = 0.32), extension was 32.5° versus 29.5° (p = 0.09), grip test compared to the controlateral side was 72% versus 62% (p = 0.53), Quick Dash score was 12.5 versus 17.6 (p = 0.84), PRWE was 18.7 versus 17.6 (p = 0.38), subjective mobility was 7.8 versus 7.5 (p = 0.23), and satisfaction score was 8.7 versus 9 (p = 0.76), respectively, in the FCA group and the PRC group. Re-operation rates were 14% patients in the FCA group and 0% in the PRC group. CONCLUSION: This study found no significant difference between FCA and PRC on strength, mobility, and function in patients with post-traumatic SLAC or SNAC stage II wrist arthritis. Both FCA and PRC seem to be reliable surgical techniques with good outcomes with more revision in the FCA group.

Recurrence rate and patient-reported outcomes after wedge excision of carpal boss.

The treatment of carpal boss is primarily conservative. Surgical treatment by performing a wedge excision of the bony protrusion, is possible. However, a common belief exists that carpal boss should not be operated because of the high recurrence rate. Additionally, little is known about the clinical outcomes of wedge excision and the preferred post-operative treatment. Patients with carpal boss and persisting pain who underwent wedge excision after conservative treatment were included. They received questionnaires before and three months after surgery. The primary outcomes were pain and hand function measured using patient-reported wrist evaluations (PRWE). Secondarily, recurrence, patient satisfaction and time until return to work were evaluated. These clinical outcomes were also compared between patients who received a plaster splint or a pressure dressing post-operatively. 76 patients were included. Three months after surgery, a significant improvement in PRWE was seen, for both pain and function. A re-operation rate for recurrent carpal boss of 13% was observed. After three months, 58% of patients were satisfied and 73% had returned to work. While no differences in clinical outcomes were found, patients were more satisfied after receiving a pressure dressing than a plaster splint post-operatively. The current study demonstrates encouraging early outcomes after wedge excision, and a low recurrence re-operation rate. Furthermore, a pressure dressing seems preferable post-operatively compared to a plaster splint.

A Changing Landscape in the Surgical Management of Wrist Arthritis: An Analysis of National Trends From 2009 to 2019.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the trends in the annual volume and incidence of proximal row carpectomy (PRC), four-corner fusion (4CF), total wrist arthrodesis (TWF), and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) from 2009 to 2019 in the United States. METHODS: The IBM Watson Health MarketScan databases were queried to identify annual case volumes for PRC, 4CF, TWF, and TWA from 2009 to 2019. The annual incidence of these procedures was then calculated based on the population estimates from the US Census Bureau. Trends in annual volume and incidence over the study period were evaluated using regression line analysis. Further subgroup analysis was conducted based on age and region. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2019, the total case volumes for the four procedures increased by 3.4%, but the incidence decreased by 2.8%. However, PRC case volume and incidence trends significantly increased (38.2% and 29.7%, respectively), whereas 4CF remained constant. Conversely, the case volume and incidence of TWA significantly decreased (-52.2% and -54.5%, respectively), whereas TWF remained constant. When stratified by age, all four procedures decreased in the <45-year-old cohort (combined -35.1%) significantly for 4CF, TWF, and TWA. TWA decreased significantly in the <45-year-old and 45- to 65-year-old cohorts (53.6% and 63.2%, respectively). For age >65 years, the total case incidence increased by 98.9%, including a significant positive trend in TWF (175%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of wrist arthritis remains a controversial issue. However, PRC has gained recent support in the literature, and our results reflect this shift, even for the <45-year-old cohort. Furthermore, TWA declined, despite reports of positive early outcomes for fourth-generation implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Comparison of proximal row carpectomy with RCPI® versus proximal row carpectomy with Eaton's capsular interposition in the management of advanced wrist osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is one of the recommended techniques for managing wrist osteoarthritis, it implies the integrity of the lunate fossa of the radius and the proximal pole of the capitate. If PRC is not possible, it is suggested to consider combining it with a capsule interposition (such as Eaton's flap) or opting for intra- or radiocarpal arthrodesis. Another alternative is to combine capitate resurfacing with a pyrocarbon implant (RCPi®). The aims of this study was to assessed the results between proximal PRC+Eaton and those associated PRC+RCPi® for advanced wrist osteoarthritis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there would be no differences in clinical or functional outcome between proximal row carpectomy associated with RCPI® and those associated with Eaton capsular flap. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a monocentric, retrospective, multi-operator study involving 83 wrists with osteoarthritis, included between January 2000 and December 2020 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Thirty-nine patients underwent PRC+Eaton and 44 patients underwent RCPI® resurfacing. Data such as pain, flexion, extension and strength as well as functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH) were collected from the patient files at the last check-up. RESULTS: Results were comparable between the two groups in terms pain (VAS), mobility (flexion and extension), strength (GRASP) and functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH). Carpal height was better preserved in the PRC+RCPI® group, with a Youm and McMurtry index evaluated at 0.3 in the PRC+Eaton group compared to 0.4 in the PRC+RCPI® group (p-value<0.001). Radiocarpal arthrodesis was required in 16% of the PRC+Eaton group and 6.8% of the PRC+RCPI® group, with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.023). DISCUSSION: This study reports clinical and functional results that suggest RCPI® is an interesting alternative and can be associated with proximal row carpectomy in advanced wrist osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Immediate Proximal Row Carpectomy for Severe Perilunate Dislocation Injuries: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

Background: In patients with perilunate injuries (PLI) with multiple ligamentous and bony injuries involving the proximal carpal row, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be difficult and lead to poor functional outcomes. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is an alternative procedure that has been used for severely comminuted fractures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the long-term functional outcome (minimum 5 years) of patients that underwent an emergency PRC for PLI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent PRC at our centre between 2001 and 2016. Only patients with follow-up data of more than 5 years were included in the study. We evaluated range of motion, grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS) and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH). Radiographic analyses were performed to assess the presence of radiocarpal osteoarthritis and the space between the radius and capitate. Results: Thirteen patients were included, with an average follow-up of 78.07 months (6.5 years). The MMWS was 65 points (four excellent and good, four fair and five poor results) and the Quick-DASH score was 30 points. X-ray analysis reported only 15.3% of patients with radiocarpal arthrosis and an average radio-capitate joint space of 1.92 mm. Conclusions: The outcomes of PRC in the management of PLI are comparable to the results reported in literature for conventional ORIF. PRC is a simpler procedure that minimises the need for re-intervention. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Coexisting Kienböck's and Preiser's Disease of the Wrist: Experience with Proximal Row Carpectomy with Dorsal Capsular Interposition Technique.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic avascular necrosis of the lunate is known as Kienböck's disease and that of the scaphoid is known as Preiser's disease. Because the prevalence of coexisting Kienböck's and Preiser's diseases is very low, standardized stages of disease and treatments are not established. CASE PRESENTATION: We report coexisting avascular necrosis of the scaphoid and lunate in a 68-year-old woman with no history of steroids or other risk factors. We treated her with proximal row carpectomy with capsular interposition technique. A distal-based dorsal capsular flap was prepared and repaired the palmar capsule. At the last follow-up, she had no pain and had gained improved range of wrist motion. There was no arthritic change at the newly formed radiocapitate joint. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of collapsed lunate and scaphoid with avascular necrosis, the proximal row carpectomy procedure has an advantage. Proximal row carpectomy with dorsal capsular interposition can be performed when the lunate or scaphoid cannot be saved. Arthritic changes of the capitate head and distal radius lunate facet can be covered with the dorsal capsule.

Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis in the treatment of SLAC and SNAC wrist: meta-analysis and literature review.

A systematic literature review was performed on 84 articles from 2000 to 2020 on proximal row carpectomy (PRC) or four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. Qualitative assessment was conducted on 14 articles. Pain, range of motion (ROM), grip strength and complications were analyzed using weighted average means. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed for the flexion-extension arc and grip strength. A total of 1,066 PRCs and 2,771 FCAs were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 9 and 7 years respectively. Mean flexion after PRC and FCA respectively was 36.2 ° and 31.1 °, mean extension 41.4 ° and 32.4 °, and mean grip strength 26.4 kg and 27.5 kg. PRC had a larger flexion-extension arc than FCA, with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.41 (range, 0.02-0.81). No significant difference was found for grip strength. Osteoarthritis occurred in 42.2% of PRC cases, independently of capitate shape. Conversion to wrist arthrodesis was performed in 10.1% of failed PRCs. Revision was chosen in 4.7% of FCAs and conversion to wrist arthrodesis in 4.6%. We conclude that the functional results of both techniques are similar, but prefer PRC to FCA because of the lower complications rate.

Long-term results of first row carpectomy with proximal capitate resurfacing using a pyrocarbon implant.

The functional results of proximal row carpectomy with a proximal capitate resurfacing using a pyrocarbon implant were evaluated in a retrospective, multicentric, multi-operator study. The outcomes of patients operated on at five surgical centres between January 2005 and December 2018 were reviewed. The data were collected by an independent observer during standardized consultations. Based on 30 patients with a mean follow-up of 7 years, the median range of flexion and extension was 65° and the median radioulnar tilt was 45°. The median Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 14 and the improvements in strength and pain were good. Compared with the preoperative values, significant improvements were seen in the flexion and extension range of motion, radioulnar tilt and pain score. No postoperative complications were recorded.Level of evidence: IV.

Arthroscopic lunate fossa resection arthroplasty for Kienböck's disease.

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of arthroscopic lunate fossa resection arthroplasty for patients with Kienböck's disease, previously managed without operation, and a non-functional lunate fossa. For adult patients with relapse or exacerbation of pain from Kienböck's disease 2 years after the onset of symptoms, arthroscopic removal of lunate fossa cartilage was performed to reach bleeding bone, if the cartilage in the lunate fossa was non-functional and the scaphoid fossa was intact. Sixteen patients (mean age 35 years; range 27-56) were included. At a mean follow-up of 39 months (range 24-64), the preoperative mean visual analogue pain scale and QuickDASH score decreased from 7 (SD 2.2) and 50 (SD 16) to 1.4 (SD 1.6) and 13 (SD 9.6), respectively. A minor deterioration in mean radioscaphoid angle and carpal height ratio occurred. Arthroscopic lunate fossa resection arthroplasty is a viable option for selected patients with Kienböck's disease.Level of evidence: IV.

Intercarpal arthrodesis: A systematic review.

Intercarpal arthrodesis is a well-established option to treat various disorders of the carpus, such as localized osteoarthritis, carpal instability, and Kienböck's disease. This is a non-conservative procedure aimed at obtaining a stable and congruent interface between the radius and the proximal carpal row, which restores wrist function by minimizing pain and restoring grip strength. These procedures generally yield good predictable results that are maintained over time. However, all intracarpal arthrodesis procedures cause a loss of wrist range of motion. To optimize outcomes and minimize complications, especially nonunion, this surgery may require a learning curve. A precise surgical technique for preparing the bone surfaces, bringing enough bone graft, and using reliable fixation is essential. Since the late 1960s, several intracarpal arthrodesis procedures have been described. Commonly used fusions target the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, scaphocapitate, four corners, capitolunate or capitohamatolunate regions. Lesser used fusions focus on specific lesions such as the scapholunate, scapholunocapitate, lunotriquetral and triquetrohamate. Here, we propose a systematic review of the various types of intercarpal arthrodesis procedures described in the literature. After having described each arthrodesis, we specify their indications, the variations of the surgical techniques, and then present an overview of the results and complications. Finally, we discuss how these surgeries affect wrist biomechanics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

InternalBrace for Intercarpal Ligament Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: Intercarpal ligament injuries such as scapholunate and lunotriquetral tears are common causes of wrist pain. There is no shortage of surgical techniques to address these injuries, nor is there a lack of literature exploring this topic. However, research progress has not led to a consensus regarding the optimal management of subacute and chronic injuries without articular wear. The senior author (K.C.C.) has performed the spectrum of reconstructive techniques, including dorsal and volar approaches, tendon weaves, ligament tenodesis procedures, reduction and association procedures, and bone-ligament-bone techniques. In the absence of convincing, consistent outcomes, the authors began investigating a novel all-dorsal reconstructive technique using the Arthrex InternalBrace system. The complexity and unpredictable outcomes associated with traditional ligament tenodesis procedures led them to adopt the all-dorsal InternalBrace technique as their primary reconstructive approach. The authors have performed more than 20 procedures with this technique since 2019. In an average tourniquet time of under 60 minutes, they are able to achieve predictable carpal stabilization, pain relief, and restoration of motion. This is the preferred reconstructive approach of the senior author.

Pyrocarbon interposition implant after lunate resection in Kienböck's disease: A case series.

In advanced stages of Kienböck's disease, the lunate is no longer conservable. One of the surgical options is to resect the lunate and replace it with a prosthesis. The procedure consisted in lunate resection and interposition of a free APSI® or Pi2® pyrocarbon implant through a dorsal approach. Follow-up was clinical and radiological on QuickDASH and PRWE scores. At a median follow-up of 3 years, 12 patients were reviewed, with a median age of 56 years. Flexion significantly decreased from 42° to 28° (p < 0.01). Extension and pronation-supination were conserved. Strength was 94% compared to the opposite side, with no significant difference from the preoperative measurement. Median QuickDASH and PRWE scores were 15.9 and 23.5 respectively and had significantly improved. One patient underwent scaphocapitate fusion because she was still in pain; the other patients were pain-free. No patients had to change jobs because of their wrist. Radiographically, there was no carpal collapse and carpal height was conserved. Radioscaphoid angle and ulnar translation were stable. There was 1 case of asymptomatic implant dislocation. Interposition of a pyrocarbon implant after lunate resection in advanced Kienböck's disease is a motion-conserving procedure that provides pain relief and functional recovery in the short and medium term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Risk of Total Wrist Arthrodesis Following Proximal Row Carpectomy: An Analysis of 1,070 Patients.

PURPOSE: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a motion-sparing procedure with good patient-reported and clinical outcomes. Although some studies have investigated the risk of conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) after PRC, additional larger studies evaluating the specific risk factors that lead to failure are required. This study aimed to investigate the patient and procedure factors that are associated with increased risk for conversion to TWA in a large cohort of patients who underwent PRC. METHODS: The current procedural technology codes identified patients in a National Veteran's Health database undergoing a PRC over a 26-year period. Risk factors of interest comprised age, posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy, wrist arthritis pattern, bilateral surgery, smoking, comorbidities, and preoperative opioid use. The primary outcome was the rate of conversion to TWA. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to create hazard ratios of selected factors for reoperation. RESULTS: There were 1,070 PRCs performed, with a mean follow-up of 79.8 ± 59.6 months. A total of 5.3% (57/1,070) wrists underwent conversion to TWA. Younger age at the time of PRC (<50 years) significantly increased the risk of TWA (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-6.6). With every 1-year increase in age, there was a reduction of 4% (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98) in the hazard of conversion to TWA. No other factors, including concomitant posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy or bilateral PRC, increased the risk of conversion to TWA. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal row carpectomy is a motion-preserving salvage procedure with a low rate of conversion to wrist arthrodesis. Younger patient age increases the risk of conversion to arthrodesis, whereas posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy, bilateral PRCs, and comorbidity status do not appear to have an impact on the risk of arthrodesis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Open and Arthroscopically-Assisted Mini Open Proximal Row Carpectomy for Lichtman Stage IIIB and IIIC Kienböck Disease.

PURPOSE: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) can be performed in the late stages of Kienböck disease using the traditional open technique or arthroscopically. In this study, we describe the arthroscopically-assisted mini-open PRC technique. The aim of the study was to compare the functional results with the open PRC technique in advanced-stage Kienböck disease. METHODS: The medical records of patients with Kienböck disease who underwent open PRC between 2006-2010 (Cohort A) and arthroscopically-assisted PRC (AAPRC) between 2010-2018 (Cohort B) were analyzed. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, visual analog scale, and Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were compared, which were obtained at the early postoperative (third month) and final follow-up. RESULTS: Cohort A had 14 and Cohort B 21 patients. The preoperative, early, and final mean visual analog scale scores were 7, 3, and 0.3, respectively, for Cohort A, and 7, 0.3, and 0.1, respectively, for Cohort B. The preoperative mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores decreased from 69 to 34 at the third-month and 6.1 on the final follow-up visit for Cohort A and from 77 to 18, and 5 for Cohort B. The final Mayo wrist scores were excellent in 4, good in 4, and moderate in 6 of the Cohort A patients, and excellent in 11, good in 8, and moderate in 2 of the Cohort B patients. Mean flexion increased to 52° from 43° for Cohort A and to 62° from 41° for Cohort B. CONCLUSIONS: AAPRC, compared to the open PRC, resulted in increased wrist motion and increased Mayo wrist scores in the long-term. Also, the third-month patient-related outcomes revealed favorable results in the AAPRC group. We attribute these findings to the earlier initiation of postoperative wrist motion and the less invasive character of the AAPRC procedure. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Pre-operative imaging for surgical decision-making and the frequency of wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy procedures: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to (1) analyze the imaging modalities utilized pre-operatively that influence surgical decision-making for wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy procedures and (2) determine the type and frequency of these procedures for the treatment of wrist arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was performed according to the guidelines of PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, peer-reviewed literature from 2011 to 2022 was searched for use of imaging in pre-operative decision-making for wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy surgical procedures. Data were compiled to determine the type(s) of imaging modalities used pre-operatively and types of surgical techniques reported in the literature. RESULTS: Of 307 articles identified, 35 articles satisfied eligibility criteria, with a total of 1377 patients (68% men; age mean, 50.9 years [range, 10-81]) and 1428 wrist surgical interventions. Radiography was reported for pre-operative planning in all articles for all patients. Pre-operative cross-sectional imaging was reported in 2 articles (5.7%), but no articles reported detailed data on how CT or MRI influenced pre-operative wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy procedure decision-making. A dozen different types of surgical techniques were reported. The four most common procedures were four-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid excision (846, 59%), proximal row carpectomy (239, 17%), total wrist arthrodesis (130, 9%), and scaphocapitate arthrodesis (53, 4%). CONCLUSION: Radiography is always used in pre-operative decision-making, but the literature lacks data on the influence of CT and MRI for selecting among a dozen different types of wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy procedures.

Arthroscopic Radiocarpal Tendinous Inter-Position for Grade 2 Scapholunate Advanced Collapse - Surgical Technique.

Grade 2 scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC 2) can be treated by proximal row carpectomy with satisfactory results. However, this method is invasive and can limit function. The senior author had proposed an arthroscopic alternative with tendon interposition between the radius and proximal carpal row (arthroscopic interposition tendon arthroplasty [AITA]). However, this arthroscopic technique is technically difficult and requires a risky palmar arthroscopic portal. We report a modification of AITA, the one-loop arthroscopic radiocarpal tendon inter-position (1L-ARTI) that is simpler and needs only dorsal arthroscopic portals. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of two dogs treated with fascia lata autografts to repair carpal hyperextension caused by flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) tendon injury. ANIMALS: Two dogs with traumatic carpal hyperextension. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: Radiographic abnormalities were detected in the antebrachiocarpal joint of each dog. Damage to the FCU tendon were located at the ulnar head on ultrasonographic and intraoperative examinations. Each injured tendon was reconstructed with a fascia lata graft. The radius and metacarpal bones were immobilized by a type I external skeletal fixation for 6 weeks. RESULTS: No difference was detected between the operated and contralateral limbs on postoperative examination, including range of motion, and angles of the carpus during standing or extension stress. No recurrence of carpal hyperextension was observed over 36 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Carpal hyperextension was successfully treated by primary repair of the damaged area and reinforcement with fascia lata and maintained long-term joint mobility in two dogs.

Proximal row carpectomy generates better mid- to long-term outcomes than four-corner arthrodesis for post-traumatic wrist arthritis: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In posttraumatic wrist arthritis of intermediate severity, two main palliative procedures are used to preserve some mobility in the wrist: proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and scaphoid excision followed by four corner arthrodesis (4CA). Despite satisfactory overall results, the debate continues about which one provides the best results and long-term outcomes, particularly prevention of arthritis progression. Recent comparative studies now provide us with information about mid- and long-term results. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results, complications, conversion rate to total wrist arthrodesis and progression to osteoarthritis of PRC versus 4CA in the medium and long term. HYPOTHESIS: The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference between PRC and 4CA in the clinical results, complications, conversion to total wrist arthrodesis and arthritis progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out by following the PRISMA guidelines. Included were studies comparing 4CA and PRC for the treatment of post-traumatic wrist arthritis secondary to scapholunate dissociation (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion (SNAC) with a mean follow-up of 5 years. A search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases that identified 831 articles. After removing 230 duplicates and excluding 595 articles based on their title and/or abstract, and then adding 1 article manually, 7 articles were included in our analysis. Parameters analyzed were range of motion (ROM), pain, grip strength, functional scores, complications, conversion to total wrist arthrodesis, and arthritis progression. RESULTS: In the 7 articles, 1059 wrists - 582 PRC and 477 4CA - were analyzed with follow-up ranging from 5.2 to 18 years. PRC produced significantly better ROM in flexion (weighted mean difference [WMD]=10.0°; p<0.01) and in ulnar deviation (WMD=8.7°; p<0.01) along with significantly lower complication rates (OR=0.3; p<0.01) and reoperation rates (OR=0.1; p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the conversion rate, grip strength, extension, radial deviation, pain, DASH and PRWE scores. The progression of osteoarthritis could not be analyzed due to lack of data. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis was the first to include recently published mid- and long-term studies comparing PRC and 4CA. The main finding is that PRC is superior overall with better ROM and a lower complication rate. Another important finding was the absence of differences in grip strength and the conversion rate to total wrist arthrodesis. Unfortunately, the lack of systematic studies on arthritis progression leaves this question unanswered. Our findings must be interpreted cautiously because it was impossible to stratify the cases by etiology and osteoarthritis stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pancarpal dissociation, a very rare type of injury: A case report.

RATIONALE: Pan-carpal dissociation is very rare injury and there is little information as to diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of this injury. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 35-year-man presented to our hospital with severe pain and swelling of the left wrist and forearm after slipping and falling while riding a motorcycle. DIAGNOSIS: The wrist simple radiographs demonstrated unrecognizable severe fracture-dislocation of the carpal bones concomitant with fractures of the radioulnar shaft. Three-dimensional computed tomography revealed a capitate fracture-dislocation, as well as hamate dislocation, lunotriquetral (LT), and scapholunate (SL) dissociation. These findings suggested pan-carpal dissociation. INTERVENTIONS: To prevent compartment syndrome, fasciotomy, carpal tunnel release, and open reduction and plate fixation for both bone fracture were performed first. Then, for pan-carpal dissociation, the capitate, carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ), and hamate were reduced and fixed first. Then, the SL, LT, and other intercarpal ligaments were repaired. Finally, additional trans-carpal pins to reinforce the ligament repair and 2.0 mm plate to buttress the third CMCJ were fixed. The patient was instructed to begin gentle range of motion exercises of the wrist with pins from four weeks after surgery and all pins were removed at six weeks postoperatively. OUTCOMES: 12 months after the operation, the patient exhibited almost full range of motion with mild pain with VAS (Visual analogue scale) 1-2 at rest and VAS 3-4 with effort. Quick DASH (the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) score was 25 and modified Mayo score was 70. The radiographs demonstrated union of the radioulnar shaft, and the carpal bone alignment was successfully maintained. LESSONS: Pan-carpal dissociation can be diagnosed in patients with capitate fracture-dislocation, hamate dislocation, LT, and SL dissociation. This pattern of injury is very rare and the authors recommend reduction and fixation of the distal carpal row, followed by the proximal row to facilitate an easy approach to the distal carpal row. Although it is very severe injury, rigid anatomical fixation and an early rehabilitation can lead to favorable functional outcomes.

Hamatolunate impingement syndrome in golfers: results of arthroscopic burring of the apex of the hamate.

Hamatolunate impingement syndrome is an uncommon cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain in the general population. Often misdiagnosed and untreated by non-specialized physicians, it is an important source of chronic ulnar wrist pain in golfers. The purpose of this retrospective study was to report results of arthroscopic burring of the apex of the hamate for hamatolunate impingement, whether isolated or not, in golf players, with a minimum of six months follow-up. Fifteen golf players (10 amateur, 2 semi-professional and 3 professional players), aged 40-61 years, with ulnar carpal pain implicating hamatolunate impingement with Viegas type-II carpal configuration, were included. Treatment consisted in arthroscopic burring of the apex of the hamate. At an average follow-up of 11 months (range, 6-24 months), all patients were satisfied with functional results, except 1 with persistent pain and stiffness; 93% returned to sport to their prior level. Mean range of motion was improved by 17 ° for wrist flexion (range, 15 ° to 30 °) and 15 ° for wrist extension (range, 10 ° to 25 °). All patients except 1 recovered grip strength, improving from 27 kg (range, 12-53) preoperatively to 35 kg (range, 17-61) at last-follow-up, and ulnar-sided pain was alleviated during golf practice. Return to prior sport level was possible by 5.5 months for professional players and by 9 months for amateurs. Arthroscopic burring of the apex of the hamate provided good clinical results for function and pain, with fairly rapid return to sport. Hamatolunate chondritis does not always mean pathology but represents the natural progression of Viegas type II wrists.