Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma with or without chewing habits.

Oral cancer (OC) is the most common cancer in Pakistani males and the second most common in females. Major risk factors include peculiar chewing habits, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and molecular pathways. However, less data is available for this avertible cancer regarding its association with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) and chewing habits in this region. Therefore, this study was done to determine the prevalence of HR-HPV in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and its correlation with p16 and chewing habits. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsy specimens of 186 samples were tested for HR-HPV type 16/18 by PCR, followed by p16 immunostaining (IHC) in a subset of cases (n = 50). Appropriate statistical tests were applied to find the association between HR-HPV/p16 and peculiar chewing habits with significance criteria of p<0.05 with 95% CI. HR-HPV (type 16 &18) was present in seven out of 186 cases (3.8%). Of these seven cases, five were positive for HPV16, whereas two were positive for HPV16/18. The overall expression of p16 protein in 50 samples was 38% (n = 19), and among these 19-IHC positive samples, 26% were positive for HR-HPV DNA. No significant association was found between HR-HPV positivity and p16 and chewing habits (p>0.05). It was concluded that HR-HPV prevalence in OSCC was very low in our population, with no statistically significant correlation with p16 and chewing habits. These results suggest the role of HR-HPV as an independent risk factor in OSCC in the local setting.

Cervical microbiota dysbiosis associated with high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection.

High-risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes, specifically HPV16 and HPV18, pose a significant risk for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. In the multifaceted cervical microenvironment, consisting of immune cells and diverse microbiota, Lactobacillus emerges as a pivotal factor, wielding significant influence in both stabilizing and disrupting the microbiome of the reproductive tract. To analyze the distinction between the cervical microbiota and Lactobacillus-dominant/non-dominant status of HR-HPV and non-infected healthy women, sixty-nine cervical swab samples were analyzed, included 44 with HR-HPV infection and healthy controls. All samples were recruited from Human Papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program and subjected to 16s rRNA sequencing analysis. Alpha and beta diversity analyses reveal no significant differences in the cervical microbiota of HR-HPV-infected women, including 16 and 18 HPV genotypes, and those with squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), compared to a control group. In this study we identified significantly lower abundance of Lactobacillus mucosae in women with HR-HPV infection compared to the control group. Furthermore, changes in bacterial diversity were noted in Lactobacillus non-dominant (LND) samples compared to Lactobacillus-dominant (LD) in both HR-HPV-infected and control groups. LND samples in HR-HPV-infected women exhibited a cervical dysbiotic state, characterized by Lactobacillus deficiency. In turn, the LD HR-HPV group showed an overrepresentation of Lactobacillus helveticus. In summary, our study highlighted the distinctive roles of L. mucosae and L. helveticus in HR-HPV infections, signaling a need for further research to demonstrate potential clinical implications of cervical microbiota dysbiosis.

Enhanced CRISPR/Cas12a-based quantitative detection of nucleic acids using double emulsion droplets.

Pairing droplet microfluidics and CRISPR/Cas12a techniques creates a powerful solution for the detection and quantification of nucleic acids at the single-molecule level, due to its specificity, sensitivity, and simplicity. However, traditional water-in-oil (W/O) single emulsion (SE) droplets often present stability issues, affecting the accuracy and reproducibility of assay results. As an alternative, water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double emulsion (DE) droplets offer superior stability and uniformity for droplet digital assays. Moreover, unlike SE droplets, DE droplets are compatible with commercially available flow cytometry instruments for high-throughput analysis. Despite these advantages, no study has demonstrated the use of DE droplets for CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection. In our study, we conducted a comparative analysis to assess the performance of SE and DE droplets in quantitative detection of human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) DNA based on CRISPR/Cas12a. We evaluated the stability of SEs and DEs by examining size variation, merging extent, and content interaction before and after incubation at different temperatures and time points. By integrating DE droplets with flow cytometry, we achieved high-throughput and high-accuracy CRISPR/Cas12a-based quantification of target HPV18 DNA. The DE platform, when paired with CRISPR/Cas12a and flow cytometry techniques, emerges as a reliable tool for absolute quantification of nucleic acid biomarkers.

Results from a cervical cancer screening program in Samsun, Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a preventable disease. This study aimed to share the results of the national cervical cancer screening program performed in primary health care institutions in Samsun between 2015 and 2019. METHODS: Women aged 30-65 years who were screened for cervical cancer in screening centers of Samsun between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were included in this descriptive study. The data were obtained from the automation program of the "National Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Laboratory Application" used by the Provincial Directorate of Health Cancer Unit through filtering the completion time of the tests, and all results were evaluated without sampling. Thus, data were presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The mean age of 89,302 women included in the cervical cancer screening program was 45.9 ± 9.0 years. Of the samples obtained from the participants, 1.0% were determined as insufficient material, 94.1% as HPV-negative, and 4.9% as HPV-positive. The most common HPV genotypes were 16, 51, 31, and 52. Of the 4337 HPV-positive women, 74.7% of the pap smear results were negative (including infection, 36.5%), and the most common premalignant lesions were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in 7.1% and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 6.9%. HPV 16/18 was also observed in 31.7% of HPV-positive women. Seven hundred ninety-five women were referred to a specialist physician for further examination and treatment within the scope of the screening algorithm. CONCLUSION: Detecting HPV-positivity by reaching more women within the national cervical cancer screening program's scope is vital in fighting against this disease. The effectiveness of cancer screening programs should be increased by ensuring community participation through awareness activities.

Accuracy of different triage strategies for human papillomavirus positivity in an Italian screening population.

How to manage human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women in cervical cancer screening remains debated. Our study compared different strategies to triage HPV positivity in a large cohort of women participating in a population HPV-based screening program. Women were tested for HPV (Cobas 4800; Roche), and those positive were triaged with cytology; cytology-positives were referred to colposcopy, while negatives were referred to 1-year HPV retesting. All HPV-positive women were also evaluated with p16/ki67 dual staining (Roche). All lesions found within 24 months of follow-up were included in the analyses. Of the 70 146 women tested, 4757 (6.8%) were HPV-positive. Of these, 1090 were cytology-positive and were referred to colposcopy. Of the 2958 HPV-positive/cytology-negative women who presented at 1-year retesting, 1752 (59.9%) still tested positive. Cumulatively, 532 CIN2+ (including 294 CIN3+) were found. The sensitivity of cytology, HPV16/18 and p16/ki67 as triage test for CIN3+ was 67.9%, 56.0% and 85.0%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for immediate colposcopy referral was 21.0%, 15.8% and 22.9%, respectively. Combining cytology with typing increased sensitivity to 83.9% and lowered PPV to 14.8%, while combining p16/ki67 and typing increased sensitivity to 91.1%, lowering the PPV to 15.9%. Women negative to p16/ki67 triage presented a cumulative 1-year CIN3+ risk of about 1%. In conclusion, when triaging HPV positivity, p16/ki67 performed better than cytology with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. The strategies that included dual staining achieved sensitivity and low 1-year risk for CIN3+ sufficiently high enough to permit considering extending the surveillance interval to 2 to 3 years for HPV-positive/triage-negative women.

Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study.

The shift towards primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening has necessitated the search for a secondary triage test that provides sufficient sensitivity to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer, but also brings an improved specificity to avoid unnecessary clinical work and colposcopy referrals. We evaluated the performance of the previously described DNA-methylation test (S5) in detecting CIN3 and cancers from diverse geographic settings in high-, medium- and low-income countries, using the cut-off of 0.80 and exploratory cut-offs of 2.62 and 3.70. Assays were performed using exfoliated cervical specimens (n = 808) and formalin-fixed biopsies (n = 166) from women diagnosed with cytology-negative results (n = 220), CIN3 (n = 204) and cancer stages I (n = 245), II (n = 249), III (n = 28) and IV (n = 22). Methylation increased proportionally with disease severity (Cuzick test for trend, P < .0001). S5 accurately separated women with negative-histology from CIN3 or cancer (P < .0001). At the 0.80 cut-off, 543/544 cancers were correctly identified as S5 positive (99.81%). At cut-off 3.70, S5 showed a sensitivity of 95.77% with improved specificity. The S5 odds ratios of women negative for cervical disease vs CIN3+ were significantly higher than for HPV16/18 genotyping at all cut-offs (all P < .0001). At S5 cut-off 0.80, 96.15% of consistently high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-negative cancers (tested with multiple hrHPV-genotyping assay) were positive by S5. These cancers may have been missed in current primary hrHPV-screening programmes. The S5 test can accurately detect CIN3 and malignancy irrespective of geographic context and setting. The test can be used as a screening and triage tool. Adjustment of the S5 cut-off can be performed considering the relative importance given to sensitivity vs specificity.

Clinical validation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology triage of HPV-positive women: Results from the IMPACT trial.

Triage strategies are needed for primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening to identify women requiring colposcopy/biopsy. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) immunocytochemistry to triage HPV-positive women and compared it to cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. A prospective observational screening study enrolled 35 263 women aged 25 to 65 years at 32 U.S. sites. Cervical samples had HPV and cytology testing, with colposcopy/biopsy for women with positive tests. Women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) at baseline (n = 3876) were retested after 1 year. In all, 4927 HPV-positive women with valid DS results were included in this analysis. DS sensitivity for ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 at baseline was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8%-94.2%) and 91.9% (95% CI: 86.1%-95.4%), respectively, in HPV16/18-positive women and 83.0% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.8%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 77.5%-91.6%) in women with 12 "other" genotypes. Using DS alone to triage HPV-positive women showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology triage of 12 "other" genotypes, and substantially higher sensitivity but lower specificity than using cytology alone. The risk of ≥CIN2 was significantly lower in HPV-positive, DS-negative women (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.9%-4.4%), compared to triage-negative women using HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology for 12 "other" genotypes (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4%-8.5%; P < .0001) or cytology alone (7.5%; 95% CI: 6.7%-8.4%; P < .0001). DS showed better risk stratification than cytology-based strategies and provided high reassurance against pre-cancers both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up, irrespective of the HPV genotype. DS allows for the safe triage of primary screening HPV-positive women.

Human papilloma virus infection of uterine cervix and spectrum of cervical pathology in human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS.

BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is one of the most common causes of sexually transmitted viral diseases worldwide. High-risk HPV types such as HPV16 and 18 are known to cause cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individual, chance of HPV coinfection and risk of cervical dysplasia/carcinoma have been found to be significantly more than in HIV-negative individuals. AIM: In this institution-based, cross-sectional, observational study, we aim to find out the relationship of HPV infection of the uterine cervix with cervical dysplasia and neoplasia in HIV-infected/AIDS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional Pap smears were taken from HIV-infected individuals admitted in the department of gynecology and obstetrics and reported by the Bethesda system. A second sample was sent to the virology unit of ICMR for detection and typing of HPV. Control samples were taken from HIV-negative individuals. RESULTS: Fifty HIV-positive patients were included in this study. On cervical Pap smear examination, 32 cases were cytologically benign and 18 cases showed atypical cytomorphology. Twenty-four cases were HPV positive, among which 16 were cytologically atypical and 8 were benign. HPV 16 was the most common subtype (50%) followed by HPV 18 (37.5%) and others (12.5%) in HIV-positive patients. Chance of cervical dysplasia increased with age independent of HIV infection and with progressive lower CD4 count. Koilocytosis was a significant predictor of HPV infection. Majority of patients were asymptomatic. Peak incidence of HPV infection occurred in reproductive age group (20-40 years). The association between HIV and HPV coinfection (P = 0.002) and between HPV infection and cytology atypia (P < 0.0001) was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Present study highlights the necessity of routine cervical Pap smear screening in HIV infected reproductive age-group women. Early detection enables dysplasia to revert or be effectively managed.

Vaccine efficacy against persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 infection at 10 years after one, two, and three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine in girls in India: a multicentre, prospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A randomised trial designed to compare three and two doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in adolescent girls in India was converted to a cohort study after suspension of HPV vaccination in trials by the Indian Government. In this Article, the revised aim of the cohort study was to compare vaccine efficacy of single dose to that of three and two doses in protecting against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infection at 10 years post vaccination. METHODS: In the randomised trial, unmarried girls aged 10-18 years were recruited from nine centres across India and randomly assigned to either two doses or three doses of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil [Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA]; 0·5 mL administered intramuscularly). After suspension of recruitment and vaccination, the study became a longitudinal, prospective cohort study by default, and participants were allocated to four cohorts on the basis of the number vaccine doses received per protocol: the two-dose cohort (received vaccine on days 1 and 180 or later), three-dose cohort (days 1, 60, and 180 or later), two-dose default cohort (days 1 and 60 or later), and the single-dose default cohort. Participants were followed up yearly. Cervical specimens were collected from participants 18 months after marriage or 6 months after first childbirth, whichever was earlier, to assess incident and persistent HPV infections. Married participants were screened for cervical cancer as they reached 25 years of age. Unvaccinated women age-matched to the married vaccinated participants were recruited to serve as controls. Vaccine efficacy against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infections (the primary endpoint) was analysed for single-dose recipients and compared with that in two-dose and three-dose recipients after adjusting for imbalance in the distribution of potential confounders between the unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN98283094, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00923702. FINDINGS: Vaccinated participants were recruited between Sept 1, 2009, and April 8, 2010 (date of vaccination suspension), and followed up over a median duration of 9·0 years (IQR 8·2-9·6). 4348 participants had three doses, 4980 had two doses (0 and 6 months), and 4949 had a single dose. Vaccine efficacy against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infection among participants evaluable for the endpoint was 95·4% (95% CI 85·0-99·9) in the single-dose default cohort (2135 women assessed), 93·1% (77·3-99·8) in the two-dose cohort (1452 women assessed), and 93·3% (77·5-99·7) in three-dose recipients (1460 women assessed). INTERPRETATION: A single dose of HPV vaccine provides similar protection against persistent infection from HPV 16 and 18, the genotypes responsible for nearly 70% of cervical cancers, to that provided by two or three doses. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Association Between Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Pregnant Women and Preterm Birth.

Importance: Preterm birth remains a leading cause of perinatal mortality and lifelong morbidity worldwide. The cause of most preterm births is unknown, although several infectious processes have been implicated. Objective: To assess whether human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, a frequent infection among women of childbearing age, is associated with preterm birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: The prospective HERITAGE cohort study was conducted at 3 academic hospitals in Montreal, Québec, Canada, among 899 pregnant women recruited between November 8, 2010, and October 16, 2016. Follow-up was completed on June 15, 2017. Statistical analysis was conducted from February 6, 2020, to January 21, 2021. Exposures: Vaginal HPV DNA detection in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and placental HPV infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was preterm birth (defined as a live birth or stillbirth between 20 weeks and 0 days and 36 weeks and 6 days of gestation). The association between HPV DNA detection and preterm birth was measured using logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weights of the propensity score. Results: The study included 899 women (mean [SD] age, 31.3 [4.6] years [range, 19-47 years]) with singleton pregnancies. A total of 378 women (42.0%) had HPV DNA detected in vaginal samples collected during the first trimester, and it was detected in 91 of 819 placentas (11.1%) at delivery. Fifty-five participants experienced preterm birth (38 spontaneous and 17 medically indicated). Persistent vaginal HPV-16/18 detection was significantly associated with all preterm births (adjusted OR [aOR], 3.72; 95% CI, 1.47-9.39) and spontaneous preterm births (aOR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.13-9.80), as was placental HPV infection (all preterm births: aOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.06-6.03; spontaneous preterm births: aOR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.09-7.81). Results were similar when restricting the analysis to participants without a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The study's results suggest that persistent HPV-16/18 infection is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, independent of cervical treatment. Future studies should investigate the association of HPV vaccination and vaccination programs with the risk of preterm birth.

Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal strategy for the triage of women who test high-risk (hr) HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples. METHODS: This is a diagnostic accuracy sub-analysis of the GRECOSELF study, which reported on HPV-DNA testing with self-sampling in Greece. More than 13,000 women, 25-60 years old, who resided in rural areas of Greece, provided a self-collected cervicovaginal sample. Samples were tested for HPV-DNA and HPV16/18 genotyping with the cobas® HPV test (Roche® Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA). HrHPV positive women were referred for colposcopy. Prior to colposcopy a physician-collected sample was obtained for cytology. After colposcopy/biopsy, women were classified as having cervical disease or not, and treated accordingly. RESULTS: Out of 1070 hrHPV positive women, 773 were subjected to colposcopy. Seventeen triage strategies, combining HPV16/18 genotyping and cytology, were investigated. The strategy referring to colposcopy women positive for HPV16 regardless of the cytology report, and women positive for other hrHPVs, in case of a subsequent atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+) cytology report, presented optimal trade-off; sensitivity 96.36% [(95%CI: (91.41-100.0)], positive predictive value (PPV) 27.46% [95%CI: (21.16-33.76)], and number of colposcopies required to detect one case of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade-2 or worse (CIN2+) 3.64. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal strategy for the triage to colposcopy of hrHPV positive women, detected with the cobas® HPV test on self-collected cervicovaginal samples, is referring all HPV16 positive women directly to colposcopy, and women positive for HPV18 or other hrHPVs only after an ASCUS or worse cytology report.

Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the colposcopy indication proposed by the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests (the 2019 ASCCP guidelines). METHODS: Clinical data of 1404 patients who underwent colposcopy in single center in China were reviewed. Based on history and current cervical screening (HPV & cytology), corresponding recommendations were given according to the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The agreement and discrepancy of colposcopy indication were analyzed between the Chinese consensus and the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. RESULTS: Colposcopy indication was matched in about 80% patients. The left 20% were recommended with follow-up by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The discrepancy mainly focused on patients having a current result of HPV-positive NILM without unknown history. The ratio of observed CIN3+ in our database over estimated CIN3+ by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines was 6.2 (31/5). The ratio was even higher in patients with HPV16/18-positive NILM (7, 28/4), compared with those with other types of high-risk HPV-positive NILM (3, 3/1). The 2019 ASCCP guidelines had a relatively high sensitivity (83.1%), a low specificity (21.5%), a low positive predictive value (14.1%) and a high negative predictive value (89.1%) for prediction of CIN 3+. CONCLUSIONS: We could try to apply the 2019 ASCCP guidelines in Chinese population. The classification of HR-HPV was strongly recommended during risk assessment. For patients with HPV16/18 infection, colposcopy should be recommended. Perspective multi-center randomized controlled trial with reliable follow-up should be performed in the future to confirm the feasibility.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 infection and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers among humans. The role of HPV as one of the etiological agents in esophageal carcinogenesis is partially unknown. We assessed whether the available evidence supports the association of HPV with risk and prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs). DESIGN: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were searched up to February 2021. The included studies were prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the incidence, risk, and prognosis of HPV-16/18-related ESCCs in adult subjects. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of ESCC in HPV-16/18 carriers. Secondary outcomes included the risk of ESCCs compared with healthy HPV-16/18 carriers (expressed as odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and the survival of HPV + versus HPV- ESCCs. RESULTS: The search identified 1649 unique citations, of which 145 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the pooled analysis (16,484 patients). The pooled HPV prevalence in ESCCs was 18.2% (95% CI 15.2-21.6%; P < 0.001). A significantly increased ESCC risk was associated with HPV infection (OR = 3.81; 95% CI 2.84-5.11; P < 0.001). Main limitation were methods of HPV detection (DNA only), race of populations included (mainly Asiatic countries) and lack of adjustment for other prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that HPV-16/18 is detectable in about 1 on 5 cases of ESCC with different prevalences across the world. It is moderately but significantly associated with a diagnosis of ESCC. Further epidemiological studies are needed to confirm and increase the current knowledge of the subject.

Infection with Human Papillomavirus 18 Promotes Alkylating Agent-Induced Malignant Transformation in a Human Esophageal Cell Line.

The relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) and esophageal cancer (EC) has been controversial, which may be caused by the difference in geographic regions of sample origin. Thus, we conducted a case-control study to find that HPV increased the risk of esophageal cancer, and the HPV18 detection rate is the highest (24.2%) among patients with EC, suggesting that HPV18 could be the most risk subtype of HPV infected. We then identified high-risk HPV18 and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitroso-guanidine (MNNG) to establish a model on the viral etiology cooperating with environmental carcinogens. Het-1A cells containing HPV18 were continuously exposed to MNNG or not; then the morphological phenotype and function assays were performed in 25th passage cells. MNNG promoted the proliferation and invasion abilities and inhibited apoptosis both in Het-1A-HPV18 and control group. However, the Het-1A-HPV18 had a stronger change in phenotypic features and formed more transformed foci in soft agar. Further, Western blot found p53 and p21 were down-regulated, and expression of c-Myc, MMP-2, and MMP-9 and Bcl-2/Bax ratio were up-regulated. Our results revealed that MNNG was easier to induce malignant transformation of Het-1A cells transfected with HPV18. It is good evidence for the close relationship between HPV and the etiology of EC, providing foundation for further study in molecular mechanism and specific intervention targets.

High Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Type 18 in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this study were to investigate the detection rate of high-risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (high-risk HPV16/18) in oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) including oral leukoplakia (OL) and oral lichen planus (OLP) in a Thai population and their associations with demographic, risk habits, and clinicopathologic features. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed specimens from 101 OL and 59 OLP patients with patients' demographic, risk habits, and clinicopathologic data were collected. Conventional qualitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect high-risk HPV16/18 DNA. Associations between high-risk HPV type 16/18 and demographic, clinicopathologic, risk factors (tobacco and alcohol uses) of OPMDs were analysed by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. The results with p value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: HPV16/18 DNA was found in both OL and OLP groups with the detection rate of 19.8% and 18.6%, respectively. Approximately 90% of high-risk HPV were HPV18 subtype. Additionally, in OL group, high-risk HPV was found more frequently in patients with moderate/severe dysplasia than that in mild dysplasia. Interestingly, in OLP group, high-risk HPV was only detected in atrophic/ulcerative subtypes. None of risk factors was associated with high-risk HPV. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 19% of OPMDs were HPV16/18-positive. HPV18 DNA was predominantly detected in both OL and OLP patients (90%). Additionally, the detection rate of high-risk HPV was higher in more severe dysplastic cases of OL and more clinically severe cases of OLP.

Human Papilloma Virus 18-Positive Submucosal Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Vagina: An Immunohistochemical and Genomic Study.

Primary vaginal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is extremely rare among female genital tract tumors. Here, we report 2 cases of vaginal small cell NEC (SCNEC) using immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. The 2 patients were in their mid-to-late 70s, presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding and had a vaginal submucosal mass. The biopsied or resected tumors showed a typical neuroendocrine morphology consisting of solid nests of atypical tumor cells, with no specific organoid patterns, and proliferating in the vaginal submucosa. Immunohistochemical analysis showed strong and diffuse expression of chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and p16, but no thyroid transcription factor 1 expression. Additionally, both cases were positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) 18. An NGS-based cancer panel analysis revealed that the tumors carried NF1 and AR mutations, but no major driver mutations were detected. The results of this study suggested that HPV18 infection is linked to vaginal SCNEC.

Age-related distribution of uncommon HPV genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.

AIM: Cervical cancer prevention guidelines include Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test, cytology, and HPV-16/18 typing for triage to determine the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 as the best proxy of cervical cancer risk. In doing that, they do not consider how age can modify the type-specific risk of CIN3. The present study aimed to evaluate the age-related distribution of HPV genotypes affecting the risk-assessment in cervical cancer screening programs: non-screening-type-HPV and non-HPV-16/18 in unvaccinated women with CIN3. METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional study, including HPV genotyped women with CIN3 on cone histology treated between 2014 and 2019. The sample was divided into three categories of age: <30, 30-44, ≥45. HPV genotypes were grouped in non-screening-type-HPV (not-including genotypes 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68) and non-HPV-16/18. Associations and trends between different age-groups and HPV genotypes were measured. RESULTS: 1332 women were analyzed. Non-screening-type-HPV CIN3 were 73 (5.5%). Non-HPV-16/18 were found in 417 participants (31.3%). Women over 45 associated with non-screening-type HPV [odds ratio (OR) = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-3.25; p = 0.027]. Non-screening-type-HPV prevalence increased significantly with age (3.9% vs 5.1% vs 9.0%, p = 0.016). Women under 30 showed a lower rate of non-HPV-16/18 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.89; p = 0.007). There was a positive trend with age of non-HPV-16/18 CIN3 (23.6% vs 32.1% vs 38.0%, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The proportion of CIN3 lesions unrelated to genotypes detected by primary screening tests increased with age. This implies that age probably modifies the risk of CIN3 and possibly of cancer associated with HPV types. The risk-based recommendation should take into consideration age to define the management of HPV positive women.

DNA methylation marker for the triage of hrHPV positive women in cervical cancer screening: Real-world evidence in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening followed by reflex cytology if high-risk HPV is present (hrHPV+) is recently adopted in some countries. However, reflex cytology's sensitivity is variable, and a suitable triage approach for hrHPV+ remains controversial. Here, we compared the performance of three triage tools in hrHPV+ women. METHODS: Three triage tools-cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping, and DNA methylation biomarker PAX1m-were analyzed for their clinical performance in hrHPV+ women. In addition, women without cervical cancer at enrollment were followed for histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+) annually using Papanicolaou smear. RESULTS: Of 4762 women aged ≥20 years enrolled, 502 (10.5%) were hrHPV+. PAX1m and cytology demonstrated similar accuracy (>90%), sensitivity (>78%), and specificity (>92%) as triage tools in 429 hrHPV+ women aged 30-64 years. PAX1m had better accuracy and specificity (91.6% and 92.5%, respectively) than HPV16/18 (76.9% and 76.8%, respectively). The incidence of CIN3+ among hrHPV+ women was 10.7 cases/1000 person-years. The incidence was significantly greater in PAX1m-positive women than in PAX1m-negative women. CONCLUSIONS: PAX1m has comparable clinical performance to cytology and better accuracy and specificity than HPV16/18 as the triage tool for detecting CIN3+ in hrHPV+ women. The PAX1m assay is thus a promising molecular-based triage tool for early detection of CIN and predicting disease progression in hrHPV+ women. It can be especially useful in countries where adequate cytology-based infrastructure is lacking, such as some Southeast Asian countries, for cervical cancer screening and prevention.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis of a Poorly Differentiated Cervical Carcinoma Caused by Human Papillomavirus Type 18.

Cervical cancer is caused by a persistent infection with high-risk types of Papillomaviruses (hrHPV); HPV16 and HPV18 are associated with about 70% of the cases. In the last decades the introduction of a cervical cancer screening has allowed a decrease in cervical cancer incidence and mortality; regular adhesion to the screening procedures, by pap test or HPV test, and colposcopy, according to the international guidelines, prevents cancer development and allows for diagnosis at the early stages. Nowadays, in industrialized countries, it is not common to diagnose this pathology in advanced stages, and this occurrence is frequently associated with patient's unattendance of cervical screening programs. We describe a case of delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer, posed only after the onset of the neurological symptoms caused by leptomeningeal metastases, despite a two-year history of abnormal cytology. The endocervical mass was analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and search and typing of HPV sequences was performed by PCR in the meningeal carcinomatous cells. A poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed, and HPV18 sequences were detected. This rapidly fatal case highlights the importance of following the evidence-based recommended protocols and the preventive role of the population-based cervical cancer screening programs.

Frequent high-risk HPV co-infections excluding types 16 or 18 in cervical neoplasia in Guadeloupe.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the fourth cancer worldwide. The Human Papilloma Virus is responsible for 99% of the cases but the distribution of its genotypes varies among populations. We aimed to identify HPV genotypes distribution in women with grade 2/3 cervical intraepithelial dysplasia or invasive cervical cancer in Guadeloupe, a French Caribbean territory with a population mainly of African descent. METHODS: We used paraffin-embedded tumors for viral DNA extraction from women diagnosed between 2014 and 2016 and identified by the population-based cancer registry. The HPV Genotyping was performed with the InnoLIPA HPV Genotyping Extra kit®. RESULTS: Overall, 213 samples out of the 321 eligible records were analyzed. The HPV status was positive for 94% of the cases. The five most common oncogenic HPV genotypes were HPV31 (47%), HPV33 (38%), HPV16 (32%), HPV44 (31%) and HPV26 (28%). HPV18 was found in only in 5% of the cases. Among the studied cases, 94% had multiple infections. More than 60% of single infections were HPV16-related, accounting for 35% of HPV16 infections. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a different distribution of oncogenic HPVs in Guadeloupe with "31 >  33 > 16" and a high frequency of multiple infections. Despite a lower coverage, the nine-valent vaccine is nevertheless adequate.