Does Patellar Denervation with Electrocautery Benefits for Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patellar Resurfacing: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trails.

To investigate the effects of patellar denervation (PD) and non-patellar denervation (NPD) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, this study conducted systematic electronic searches in November 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus, adhering to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Additionally, a manual search was performed to identify potentially eligible studies from the reference lists of review articles. Two researchers independently conducted literature reviews, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. The outcome analysis encompassed the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP), visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), American Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), patellar score (PS), complications, and reoperations. Meta-analysis was executed using RevMan 5.3 software. To enhance the credibility of the study, TSA v0.9 software was utilized to perform power analysis on the overall efficacy of primary and secondary outcomes. Twelve studies involving 1745 patients (1587 knees) were included, with 852 undergoing PD and 893 undergoing NPD. Results indicated a superior reduction in AKP incidence in the PD group compared to the NPD group. Statistically significant differences were observed between PD and NPD in KSS, OKS, and PS. However, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for each outcome fell below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). No significant differences were found in VAS and ROM between PD and NPD. Additionally, PD was not associated with an increased incidence of complications or reoperations. Within 12 months and beyond, PD was proven to be a beneficial intervention in reducing AKP following TKA without patellar resurfacing, achieved without an increase in complications or reoperations. Regarding KSS, OKS, and PS, the minimal advantage achievable through PD may not be clinically significant.

A modified oblique incision in hamstring tendon graft harvesting during ACL reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, different methods of harvesting hamstring tendon may lead to different degrees of injury to the inferior patellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN). Most of recent studies in the literature suggest that the classic oblique incision (COI) can reduce the incidence of IPBSN injury. We proposed a modified oblique incision (MOI) and compared it with the COI in terms of the resulting levels of injury and sensory loss and the clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients with ACL injury admitted to our hospital from April 2015 to July 2019 were randomly selected and included in our study. Thirty patients underwent the COI to harvest hamstring tendons, and the other 32 patients underwent the MOI. The pin prick test was performed to detect the sensation loss at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. Digital photos of the region of hypoesthesia area were taken, and then, a computer software (Adobe Photoshop CS6, 13.0.1) was used to calculate the area of the hypoesthesia. The length of the incision and knee joint functional score were also recorded. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the incidence of IPBSN injury in COI and MOI were 33.3% and 9.4%, and the areas of paresthesia were 26.4±2.4 cm2 and 9.8±3.4 cm2 respectively. There was no significant difference in the incision length or knee functional score between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The MOI can significantly reduce the risk of injury to the IPBSN, reduce the area of hypoesthesia, and lead to high subjective satisfaction. Therefore, compared with the COI, the MOI is a better method of harvesting hamstring tendons in ACL reconstruction.

Patellar Denervation with Electrocautery Reduces Anterior Knee Pain within 1 Year after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of patellar denervation with electrocautery (PD) on anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the use of PD in TKA without patellar resurfacing. METHODS: A computerized search of published studies was performed in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases in December 2019. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of the PD group and the non-PD group. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the follow-up time (3, 12 months, and over 12 months) to evaluate whether the clinical effect of PD changed with time. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results showed a lower rate of AKP (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.97; P = 0.03) and a reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) for AKP (mean difference, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.05; P = 0.02) in the PD group when compared to the non-PD group. Subgroup analyses found the differences in AKP incidence and VAS for AKP were significant at 3- and 12-month follow-up but not after 12-month follow-up. No significant difference was observed in functional scores between the two groups. No specific complication directly or indirectly related to PD was found. CONCLUSION: PD can decrease the incidence and severity of AKP within 12 months after TKA, but the effect cannot be maintained after 12-month follow-up. Without significant associated complication and reoperation, the use of PD is still recommended in TKA without patellar resurfacing.

Effect of Patellar Denervation on Anterior Knee Pain and Knee Function in Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patellar Resurfacing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of patellar denervation (PD) in preventing anterior knee pain (AKP) and improving knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, and to help surgeons decide whether or not to use PD in TKA. METHODS: The electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the outcomes of PD and no patellar denervation (NPD) in TKA without patellar resurfacing. Primary outcomes were incidence of AKP, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and patellar score (PS). Secondary outcomes were Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), knee range of motion (ROM), and complications. RESULTS: A total of nine RCT met the inclusion criteria. On meta-analysis, PD significantly reduced the incidence of AKP (odds ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 0.92), reduced the VAS (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.57; 95% CI -1.02 to -0.11), and improved the WOMAC (WMD -4.63; 95% CI -6.49 to -2.77) and the ROM (WMD 9.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 18.81) during the follow-up within 12 months. In addition, PD improved the PS (WMD 1.01; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.38), KSS (WMD 1.12; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.14), and the WOMAC (WMD -1.41; 95% CI -2.74 to -0.08) during the follow-up after 12 months. CONCLUSION: Patellar denervation could significantly reduce the VAS and the incidence of AKP in the early stages after TKA as well as improve the clinical outcomes in terms of the PS, the WOMAC, the KSS, and the ROM. This study demonstrates that PD is a safe and recommendable technique that could be routinely performed in TKA.

The efficacy of patellar denervation with electrocautery after total knee replacement: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of patellar denervation with electrocautery for reducing pain and improving clinical outcomes after total knee replacement. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases on February 2020. Two researchers independently completed the literature screening, data extraction, and risk evaluation of bias. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, range of motion, patellar score, American Knee Society score, Oxford knee score and postoperative complications. STATA 13.0 software was applied for meta-analysis. RESULT: A total of nine studies involving 1319 patients were included in our study. The present meta-analysis indicated that patellar denervation with electrocautery was associated with improved pain relief and decreased opioid consumption after total knee replacement. There was significant difference between groups in terms of knee range of motion. CONCLUSION: Patellar denervation with electrocautery is effective in reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee replacement. Postoperative range of motion is significantly better in patellar denervation group, which means that patellar denervation significantly improves clinical outcome.

Anatomical study of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve with applications to knee surgery / Estudio anatómico de la rama infrapatelar del nervio safeno con aplicaciones a la cirugía de rodilla

The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is a cutaneous nerve that innervates the area surrounding the patella and contributes to the peripatellar plexus. This nerve is target to iatrogenic injuries during a great deal of knee procedures, such as tendon harvesting, total knee arthroplasty and medial arthroscopic approaches to the knee. Lesion to this nerve can produce sensorial loss at its innervation territory. The study conducted herein aims to observe the anatomical aspects of the infrapatellar branch in cadaveric specimens. The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve of 40 male cadavers was dissected with the purpose of identifying the number of branches, its relation with the patella, tibial tuberosity and sartorius muscle. The nerve was dissected and several measurements were performed with the aid of a digital caliper. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc 16.1 software. The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve was present in 100 % of the sample. Its mean distance from its origin to its branching point was 16.35±6.48 mm on the right and 21.94±4.31 mm on the left, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). A relatively safe zone for surgery was observed on the superior and medial aspect of the patella, which received less branches.

La rama infrapatelar del nervio safeno es un nervio cutáneo que inerva el área que rodea la patela y contribuye al plexo peripatelar. Este nervio es objeto de lesiones iatrogénicas durante una gran cantidad de procedimientos de rodilla, como la extracción de tendones, la artroplastía total de rodilla y los abordajes artroscópicos mediales de la rodilla. La lesión de este nervio puede producir pérdida sensorial en su territorio de inervación. El estudio realizado aquí tiene como objetivo observar los aspectos anatómicos de la rama infrapatelar en muestras de cadáveres. La rama infrapatelar del nervio safeno de 40 cadáveres masculinos se disecó con el propósito de identificar el número de ramas, su relación con la patela, la tuberosidad tibial y el músculo sartorio. Se disecó el nervio y se realizaron varias mediciones con la ayuda de un calibrador digital. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el software MedCalc 16.1. La rama infrapatelar del nervio safeno estaba presente en el 100 % de las muestras. La distancia media desde su origen hasta su punto de ramificación fue de 16,35±6,48 mm a la derecha y de 21,94±4,31 mm a la izquierda, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p <0,05). Se identificó una zona relativamente segura para la cirugía en el aspecto superior y medial de la patela, que recibió menos ramas.

Ultrasound Anatomic Demonstration of the Infrapatellar Nerve Branches.

PURPOSE: To (1) confirm the correct identification of the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve (IPBSNs) by high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) with ink marking and consecutive dissection in anatomic specimens; (2) evaluate the origin, course, and end-branch distribution in healthy volunteers; and (3) visualize the variable anatomic course of the IPBSN by HRUS. METHODS: HRUS with high-frequency probes (15-22 MHz) was used to locate the IPBSN in 14 fresh anatomic specimens at 4 different locations. The correct identification of the IPBSN was verified by ink marking and consecutive dissection. Moreover, the IPBSNs were located in both knees of 20 healthy volunteers (n = 40). Their courses were marked on the volunteers' skin in a flexed-knee position. Distances were measured from the IPBSN branch closest to the median of the patella base (D1), center (D2), and apex (D3) and in a 45° (D4) and 0° (D5) relation to the median patella apex. Standardized photographs of all knees were mapped on 1 typically shaped knee. RESULTS: Dissection confirmed the correct identification of the IPBSN in 86% to 100% of branches, depending on their location. Intraindividual differences for distance measurements were observed for D1 (P < .001) and D2 (P = .002). The coefficient of variation was highest for D5 (0.86) and lowest for D1 (0.14). Mapping of the nerve branches on a typical knee showed a highly variable course for the IPBSN. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the reliable ability to visualize the IPBSN and its variations with HRUS in anatomic specimens and in healthy volunteers; such visualization may therefore enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with anteromedial knee pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound successfully pinpoints the variable course of the IPBSN from the origin to the most distal point and, therefore, may enable the correct identification of (iatrogenic) nerve damage in every location.

Association between incision technique for hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the risk of injury to the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine how the incision technique for hamstring tendon (HT) harvest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affects the risk of injury to the IPBSN and clinical outcome. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and EBSCOhost electronic databases and clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished studies was performed to identify comparative studies investigating injury to the IPBSN after HT ACL reconstruction by comparing at least two different incision techniques. Data were extracted for the number of patients with evidence of any neurologic deficit corresponding to injury to the IPBSN, area of sensory deficit, the Lysholm score and patient satisfaction. The mean difference (MD) in study outcome between incision groups was assessed. The relative risk (RR) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. The Chi-square and Higgins' I2 tests were applied to test heterogeneity. Data were pooled using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model if the statistical heterogeneity was > 50% and a fixed-effects model if the statistical heterogeneity was < 50%. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane Database questionnaire and the quality of evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. RESULTS: A total of eight studies (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five comparative studies) were included, of which six compared vertical and oblique incisions, one horizontal and vertical incisions, and one compared all three techniques. HT harvest was performed through a vertical incision in 329 patients, through an oblique incision in 195 patients and through a horizontal incision in 151 patients. Considering the meta-analysis of the RCTs, the performance of a vertical incision significantly increased the risk of causing IPBSN deficiency compared with both oblique and horizontal incision [RR 1.65 (CI 1.10-2.49, p = 0.02) and RR 2.45 (CI 1.73-3.47, p < 0.0001), respectively]. A significantly larger area of sensory deficit was found with vertical incisions compared with oblique ones, with an MD of 22.91 cm2 (95% CI 7.73-38.08; p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between the incision techniques in relation to patient-reported outcomes. The same trend was obtained after the performing a meta-analysis of all eight included studies. The quality of evidence in this meta-analysis was determined as "low" to "moderate", mostly due to inadequate methods of randomization and high heterogeneity among the included studies. CONCLUSION: The performance of a vertical incision to harvest HTs for ACL reconstruction significantly increased the risk of iatrogenic injury to the IPBSN compared with both oblique and horizontal incisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-III, meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Patellar denervation for Anterior Knee Pain Management in Knee Arthroplasty / Denervação patelar para tratamento da dor anterior na artroplastia total do joelho

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of patellar denervation versus non-patellar denervation in reducing anterior knee pain on a follow-up period of at least one year after total knee arthroplasty. METHOD: Data from 84 patients, who underwent total knee arthroplasty were analyzed. Participants were divided into 2 groups; group A: 42 patients who previously underwent total knee arthroplasty with patellar denervation; and group B: 42 patients who previously underwent total knee arthroplasty without patellar denervation. Results were evaluated using WOMAC and KSS questionnaires, and the VAS pain measurement. Knee ranges of motion were measured. Preoperative clinical conditions of both groups were similar. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the following results were observed. (a), the WOMAC scores for group A were significant better when compared to group B (27.95 ± 5.89 vs. 33,55 ± 6.23; (b) better results were also found in KSS scores for group A vs. group B (86.19 ± 7.10 vs. 83,07 ± 4.88); (c) the range of knee flexion was smaller than in group A vs. group B (119.0 ± 10.7 vs 125.5 ± 11.0 degrees); (d) there was no significant difference between the mean of range of knee extension between the two groups groups; (e) in terms pain referred by the patient, no difference was observed according to VAS pain. CONCLUSION: Patellar denervation does not show better effect in pain reduction compared with TKA with non-patellar denervation. However, it had a better beneficial effect on knee function score, as measured through the KSS and WOMAC questionnaires.

OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia de denervação patelar em relação à não-denervação patelar na redução da dor anterior do joelho em um período de acompanhamento de no mínimo um ano após a artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ). MÉTODO: Foram analisados dados de 84 pacientes, submetidos a ATJ e divididos em 2 grupos: grupo A formado por 42 pacientes submetidos à ATJ com denervação patelar (PD) e grupo B formado por 42 pacientes submetidos a ATJ sem a denervação (ND). Os resultados foram avaliados utilizando os questionários WOMAC e KSS, além da escala analógica visual da dor (EVA). Também foi avaliada a amplitude de movimento em graus. As condições clínicas pré-operatórias dos dois grupos foram semelhantes. RESULTADOS: Comparando a pontuação do questionário WOMAC, o grupo A apresentou melhores resultados, com media de 27,95 ± 5,89, enquanto o grupo B apresentou média de 33,55 ± 6,23. Melhores resultados foram também observados no KSS para o grupo A, apresentando média de 86,19 ± 7,10, em comparação ao grupo B, com média de 83,07 ± 4,88. Observou-se menor amplitude de flexão do joelho no grupo A, 119,0 ± 10,68 graus, em comparação com o grupo B, com média de 125,5 ± 11,02 graus. Analisando exclusivamente a dor, não foi observada diferença entre a dor referida pelo paciente, de acordo com a escore da escala EVA. CONCLUSÕES: A DP não demonstrou melhores efeitos na redução da dor em comparação com ND na ATJ. No entanto um melhor efeito da denervação nos escores de função, através dos questionários KSS e WOMAC sugerem que a denervação pode ser benéfica neste cenário.

Area of Skin Numbness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Minimally Invasive Approach Make Any Difference From Standard Approach?

BACKGROUND: Skin numbness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was reported in relation to injury of the infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPBSN). METHODS: Phase I study: A nonrandomized and nonconsecutive selection of 30 patients undergoing unilateral TKA, using minimally invasive surgery approach, and 30 patients having standard approach were included. Area of skin numbness was periodically evaluated and compared until 1-year follow-up (FU). Phase II study: we dissected 15 normal cadaveric knees and followed the course and distribution of IPBSN. RESULTS: Twenty-nine predominantly female patients in each group completed 1-year FU with no differences in demographic data. Both the groups had significantly improved Knee Society Score clinical and function scores with no statistical differences. The numb areas in both the groups similarly decreased from 2 weeks (51.7 cm2 vs 51.1 cm2) to 1 year (2.1 cm2 vs 2.4 cm2) with similar percentages of no skin numbness at 1 year (69% vs 65%). The IPBSN branched from saphenous nerve before exiting the adductor canal and ran longitudinally and obliquely. It was found as a single nerve in 20%, a 2-branch nerve in 67% and a 3-branch nerve in 13%. All branches crossed the knee midline between superior patellar pole and tibial tubercle. CONCLUSION: Clinical study showed that TKA using minimally invasive surgery approach provided similar area of skin numbness to standard approach. Numbness area gradually decreased at serial FUs in both the groups. The cadaveric study demonstrated that the IPBSN consistently gave no branch passing the knee midline above superior patellar pole.

Is patellar denervation necessary in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing?

PURPOSE: To conduct a meta-analysis with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in full text to determine the effectiveness of patellar denervation (PD) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for information from the earliest date of data collection to February 2015. RCTs comparing the benefits and risks of PD with those of no patellar denervation (NPD) in primary TKAs were included. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X(2) test with the significance set P < 0.10 or I (2) > 50 %. RESULTS: Six RCTs consisting of 751 patients were included. The incidences of AKP in PD group and NPD group were 38.3 % (90/235) and 46.3 % (107/231), respectively. Meta-analysis showed significant prevention effect of PD on the incidence of AKP (OR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42, 1.00; P = 0.05) without significant heterogeneity (I (2) = 44 %, P = 0.15). Our results also indicated that PD was significantly associated with better American Knee Society knee (WMD = 2.50; 95 % CI 0.34, 4.67; P = 0.02) and functional scores (WMD = 4.07; 95 % CI 1.34, 6.80; P = 0.0003) and range of motion (ROM) (WMD = 4.27; 95 % CI 1.95, 6.60; P = 0.0003) compared with NPD. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups no matter in Oxford knee score, patellar score or visual analogue scale at any other time. Complications and revisions did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that PD in TKAs without patellar resurfacing, compared with NPD, could prevent the incidence of post-operative AKP and improve clinical outcome in KSS and post-operative ROM. Based on the above results, PD was a safe procedure with no significant complications and revision or re-operations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Does patellar denervation reduce post-operative anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of patellar denervation in reducing anterior knee pain and improving patient satisfaction and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. A meta-analysis was conducted to try to settle the controversy. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Of 374 papers identified, seven randomised controlled trials involving 898 patients (983 knees) were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysis showed that patellar denervation can significantly improve clinical outcomes for the first 12 months of follow-up after TKA, including anterior knee pain incidence (P = 0.008), visual analogue scale score (P < 0.001), patellar score (P < 0.001), Knee Society Score (P = 0.03), Knee Society Score function score (P = 0.03), and knee range of motion (P = 0.008). However, no statistical significance in outcomes was found between the patellar denervation group and no-denervation group for any of those parameters after 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The best currently available evidence suggests that patellar denervation can significantly reduce anterior knee pain incidence and improve early clinical outcomes after TKA. However, after a prolonged period of follow-up, this advantage seems to disappear. Even so, the use of patellar denervation in primary TKA is recommended because it is safe and produces good early clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Circumferential electrocautery of the patella in primary total knee replacement without patellar replacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

The purpose of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to identify and assess whether circumferential electrocautery is useful for improving outcomes after primary total knee replacement(TKR). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, SpringerLink, Web of Knowledge, OVID CINAHL, OVID EBM and Google Scholar and included articles published through January 2014. A total of 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 776 cases included in the analysis, 388 cases involved patellar denervation, and 388 cases were designated as the control group. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP, p = 0.18) or in the visual analogue scale score (VAS, p = 0.23) between the two groups. In addition, AKSS Function Score indicated no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.28). However, the OKS (p = 0.02), patellar score (p = 0.01), AKSS-Knee Score (p = 0.004), range of motion (ROM, p < 0.0001) and WOMAC Score (p = 0.0003) indicated that circumpatellarelectrocautery improved clinical outcomes compared with non-electrocautery. The results indicate that circumferential electrocautery of the patella does not significantly improve AKP compared with non-electrocautery techniques but that circumferential electrocautery significantly improves patients' knee function after surgery. Therefore, we believe that circumferential electrocautery is beneficial to the outcome of primary TKR surgery without patellar replacement.

Patellofemoral resurfacing and patellar denervation in primary total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of comparing relevant clinical outcomes between patellar denervation, resurfacing and non-resurfacing. METHODS: A database search was performed using PubMed and Scopus search engines. RCTs or quasi-experimental designs comparing clinical outcomes between treatments by a search of articles dated from inception to October 23, 2012. Unstandardized mean difference (UMD) and random effects methods were applied for pooling continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. A longitudinal mixed regression model was used for network meta-analysis to indirectly compare treatment effects. RESULTS: Eighteen of 315 studies identified were eligible. Compared with patellar non-resurfacing, patellar denervation had a UMD that displayed a significant improvement in symptoms with values in pain visual analog score (VAS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) of -0.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.13, -0.25] and 2.55 (95% CI 0.43, 4.68), respectively. The UMD in VAS, KSS, and Knee Function Score (KFS) in patellar resurfacing showed no significant improvement in symptoms when compared to non-resurfacing. Patients who underwent surgery with patellar resurfacing had a lower reoperation rates with pooled relative risks (RRs) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.50, 0.94) when compared to non-resurfacing. The network meta-analysis suggested a benefit of borderline significance for patellar denervation with a pooled RR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.38, 1.03), showing that there is a lower chance of anterior knee pain when compared to non-resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing also displays a significantly lower chance of reoperation with a pooled RR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50, 0.92) when compared to non-resurfacing. Multiple active treatment comparisons indicated that patellar denervation resulted in greater improvement in KFS than patellar resurfacing. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that either patellar denervation or patellar resurfacing may be selected for the management of the patellofemoral component in total knee replacement. Patellar denervation may help improve postoperative knee function, but does not improve pain when compared to patellar resurfacing.

Anatomy of the infrapatellar branch in relation to skin incisions and as the basis to treat neuropathic pain by cryodenervation.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic knee pain, particularly of the infrapatellar branch, is an important complication of knee replacement surgery, with an incidence as high as 70%. The increasing number of elderly patients requiring knee surgery, including total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has contributed to an increase in the number of patients with this pathology. Treatment includes neurectomy, infiltration therapy, and cryodenervation. Percutaneous cryodenervation of the infrapatellar branch is a promising option. OBJECTIVE: To provide the necessary anatomical analysis to optimize percutaneous cryodenervation of the infrapatellar branch by defining sections of the unbranched ramus infrapatellaris to demonstrate the risk of nerve injury through 3 different skin incisions typically used during TKA. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical study. METHODS: Cadavers were used for assessment. Exclusion criteria were scars from knee surgery, deep wounds, and a flexion angle of no more than 90°. We compared 3 frequently used skin incisions with the course of the infrapatellar branch and identified sections of the unbranched nerves that were suitable for percutaneous cryodenervation. RESULTS: In total, 18 formalin-fixed cadavers (mean age, 78.9 years) contributed 30 knees (15 pairs) for dissection. We identified the following 4 anatomical variations of the ramus infrapatellaris in relation to the sartorius muscle: anterior, posterior, penetrating, and pes anserinus types. Sections were then found to treat the nerve branch types. The nerve sections were localized using the medial pole of the patella as a palpable landmark and varied in length between 15 mm and 40 mm. The medial parapatellar skin incision showed the highest risk of lesions to the infrapatellar branch (53.3%) followed by the midline skin incision (46.7%) and the lateral parapatellar skin incision (30.0%). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study, performed using a limited number of cadavers. This therefore precluded generalization and statistical analysis. Significantly more female (13) cadavers were examined compared to male (5). Further studies in human populations, and with larger samples, are necessary to confirm these results. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, the surgeon can localize the unbranched main nerve. Compared with the current practice, our approach should allow for a lower impact on tissues and should facilitate complete pain relief through a single cryodenervation. Furthermore, we propose that the lateral parapatellar skin incision is an acceptable alternative surgical approach in knee replacement surgery because it is associated with the lowest risk of damage to the infrapatellar branch.

A randomised, controlled trial of circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing: a concise follow-up at a mean of 3.7 years.

In the absence of patellar resurfacing, we have previously shown that the use of electrocautery around the margin of the patella improved the one-year clinical outcome of total knee replacement (TKR). In this prospective randomised study we compared the mean 3.7 year (1.1 to 4.2) clinical outcomes of 300 TKRs performed with and without electrocautery of the patellar rim: this is an update of a previous report. The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 32% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 26 to 39), and 26% (95% CI 18 to 35) in the intervention group compared with 38% (95% CI 29 to 48) in the control group (chi-squared test; p = 0.06). The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain remained unchanged between the one-year and 3.7 year follow-up (chi-squared test; p = 0.12). The mean total Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Indices and the American Knee Society knee and function scores at 3.7 years' follow-up were similar in the intervention and control groups (repeated measures analysis of variance p = 0.43, p = 0.09 and p = 0.59, respectively). There were no complications. A total of ten patients (intervention group three, control group seven) required secondary patellar resurfacing after the first year. Our study suggests that the improved clinical outcome with electrocautery denervation compared with no electrocautery is not maintained at a mean of 3.7 years' follow-up.

Does patellar rim electrocautery have deleterious effects on patellar cartilage?

BACKGROUND: Circumpatellar electrocauterization to destroy pain receptors during total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing is commonly used to decrease postoperative knee pain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of denervation with electrocauterization on patellar cartilage. METHODS: Twenty rabbits were randomly assigned to two equally sized case and control groups. The rabbits in the case group underwent surgery via the anterior midline skin incision and medial parapatellar arthrotomy, followed by denervation electrocauterization at a depth of 1 mm and a distance of 3 mm from the outer border of the patella. In the control group, surgery was identical to that performed in the case group, but without patellar denervation. Twelve weeks after surgery, all rabbits were sacrificed. Range of motion, macroscopic evaluation of cartilage using modified Outerbridge scoring, and histopathological assessment using a modified histologic scoring system for cartilage were evaluated. RESULTS: Three rabbits died during the study. Nine cases and eight animals from the control group were included in the final evaluation. All rabbits had passive full range of motion. Mean Outerbridge score was 2.0 in the case group and 0.37 in the control group (p=0.002). There were statistically significant differences in cellularity (p=0.016), loss of matrix (p=0.004), and clustering of chondrocytes (p=0.008) between the two groups. Microscopic variables as a whole were statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Circumpatellar electrocauterization may result in cartilage destruction. So, we encourage caution in using routine electrocauterization in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level II.

[Denervation of the patella: influence on mid-term results after total knee arthroplasty]. / Retropatellare Denervierung : Einfluss auf die mittelfristigen Ergebnisse von Knietotalendoprothesenimplantationen.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in the mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty in patients treated with and without denervation of the patella. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 80 total knee replacements in 71 patients who were treated with total knee replacement, either with (n = 40) or without (n = 40) simultaneous denervation of the patella out of a total population with 122 knee replacements in 100 patients. Comparability of both groups was achieved by applying matching criteria. All patients were reviewed by isokinetic tests, physical and radiological examination. The mean follow-up time was 2.2 years. RESULTS: The mean hospital for special surgery (HSS) score revealed no statistically significant differences between both groups (with denervation 77.9 ± 11.1 and without denervation 77.8 ± 11.0, p = 0.976). The isokinetic torque measurements with low angle velocity (60°/s) indicated slightly higher values during extension (60.2 ± 32.2 Nm versus 55.8 ± 25.2 Nm, p = 0.497) and flexion (52.4 ± 28.3 Nm versus 46.1 ± 22.3 Nm, p = 0.272) movements of the affected knee joint. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. At high angle velocity (180°/s) no differences could be found between both groups. No cases of postoperative necrosis of the patella were observed. Anterior knee pain after denervation was reported in 6 cases (15 %) compared to 10 cases (25 %) in patients who were treated without denervation (p = 0.402). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences could be found between patients with and without denervation of the patella for total knee arthroplasty.

Patellar denervation with electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The impact of patellar denervation with electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on post-operative outcomes has been under debate. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare the benefits and risks of circumpatellar electrocautery with those of non-electrocautery in primary TKAs. METHODS: Comparative and randomized clinical studies were identified by conducting an electronic search of articles dated up to September 2012 in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases. Six studies that focus on a total of 849 knees were analysed. A random-effects model was conducted using the inverse-variance method for continuous variables and the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of anterior knee pain between the electrocautery and non-electrocautery groups. In term of patellar score and Knee Society Score, circumpatellar electrocautery improved clinical outcomes compared with non-electrocautery in TKAs. The statistical differences were in favour of the electrocautery group but have minimal clinical significance. In addition, the overall complications indicate no statistical significance between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no strong evidence either for or against electrocautery compared with non-electrocautery in TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level III.

The surgical anatomy of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in relation to incisions for anteromedial knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is a common complication of surgical approaches to the anteromedial side of the knee. A detailed description of the relative anatomic course of the nerve is important to define clinical guidelines and minimize iatrogenic damage during anterior knee surgery. METHODS: In twenty embalmed knees, the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve was dissected. With use of a computer-assisted surgical anatomy mapping tool, safe and risk zones, as well as the location-dependent direction of the nerve, were calculated. RESULTS: The location of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is highly variable, and no definite safe zone could be identified. The infrapatellar branch runs in neither a purely horizontal nor a vertical course. The course of the branch is location-dependent. Medially, it runs a nearly vertical course; medial to the patellar tendon, it has a -45° distal-lateral course; and on the patella and patellar tendon, it runs a close to horizontal-lateral course. Three low risk zones for iatrogenic nerve injury were identified: one is on the medial side of the knee, at the level of the tibial tuberosity, where a -45° oblique incision is least prone to damage the nerves, and two zones are located medial to the patellar apex (cranial and caudal), where close to horizontal incisions are least prone to damage the nerves. CONCLUSIONS: The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is at risk for iatrogenic damage in anteromedial knee surgery, especially when longitudinal incisions are made. There are three low risk zones for a safer anterior approach to the knee. The direction of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is location-dependent. To minimize iatrogenic damage to the nerve, the direction of incisions should be parallel to the direction of the nerve when technically possible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that iatrogenic damage of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve can be minimized in anteromedial knee surgery when both the location and the location-dependent direction of the nerve are considered when making the skin incision.