Investigating the effect of insertion torque on marginal bone loss around dental implants.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The use of dental implants in restoring function, esthetics, speech, and health of oral tissues has been growing in recent years. Evaluating marginal bone resorption and the survival rate of implants placed with different torques values is crucial. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different insertion torque values on marginal bone loss around dental implants placed in the posterior region of the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 patients were involved in this study. Patient data (age, gender), implant characteristics (length, diameter), insertion torque values, gingival biotype, and bone quality were recorded, and parallel periapical radiographs measured marginal bone loss. The relationship between variables was obtained using independent t-tests, Pearson correlations, and regressions. RESULTS: The present study found a positive and significant correlation between implant insertion torque and marginal bone loss (MBL)around the dental implants during the first year after placement. Furthermore, patients with D2 bone density at the implant placement site and thin gingival biotype also had significantly higher MBLs from baseline until crown delivery and first-year follow-up than those with D3 bone density and thick gingival biotypes, respectively. CONCLUSION: A lower torque is necessary for high-risk patients to increase implantation success due to identifying patients with an increased risk for MBL.

Association of obesity and weight gain with alveolar bone loss: Results of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study.

AIM: To investigate whether long-term obesity, long-term central obesity and weight gain are associated with alveolar bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sub-population (n = 1318) of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 was categorized based on body mass index (BMI: normal weight, overweight and obesity) and waist circumference (WC: no central obesity, central obesity) at ages 31 and 46. These categories were combined to define whether the participants stayed in the same categories or passed on to a higher category (weight gain). Alveolar bone level (BL) data were collected at age 46. RESULTS: The associations of long-term obesity and weight gain with BL ≥ 5 mm were stronger in smokers than in the total population and in never smokers. Males who passed on to higher BMI and WC categories showed a higher likelihood for BL ≥ 5 mm (range in relative risks [RRs] 1.3-2.2) than males who stayed in the same categories (range in RRs 0.7-1.1). The associations with BL ≥ 5 mm were weak or non-existent in females. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between obesity and periodontal diseases seems more complex than previously presumed. The role of gender and smoking should be taken into account in future studies.

[A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for prevalence of implant biological complications].

PURPOSE: To analyze the risk factors of biological complications after implant-fixed denture restoration. METHODS: Seven hundred and twenty-five implants were placed between March 2012 and March 2016. Follow-up period was 5 to 9 years. The implant mucosal index (IMI) and implant marginal bone loss (MBL) were measured at 3 months-1 year, 2-3 years, 4-5 years, 6-7 years and 8-9 years after restoration. The prevalence and risk factors of peri-implantitis and mucositis were analyzed. SPSS 28.0 software package was used to analyze the date. RESULTS: The implant survival rate of 5 years was 98.7%. The prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis were 37.5% and 8.3% at 8 to 9 years. Smoking, periodontitis, narrow diameter, rough neck , anterior location, bone augmentation caused higher prevalence of peri-implantitis or mucositis (P＜0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, periodontitis, implant diameter, implant design, implant location and bone augmentation are the risk factors of implant biological complications.

The use of autologous bone for augmentation procedures leads to low prevalence of peri-implantitis-a retrospective study over a 20-year period.

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants inserted into pristine bone (control) to implants where autologous bone was used for grafting procedures (study). All patients who underwent implant surgery during a 20 years interval by one maxillofacial implant surgeon and received a prosthodontic rehabilitation afterwards were eligible for inclusion in the study. Periimplant bone resorption and periimplant disease were assessed. Of 421 patients 384 (91.2%) patients responded to a recall after having been treated over a 20-year period by one maxillofacial surgeon and several dentists. A total of 110 patients had 239 implants in pristine bone, and 274 patients had 607 implants placed in combination with autologous bone grafting procedures. Mean time in function was 74 months (range 15-236 months). In all, 342 implants (34.8%) were in function for longer than 7 years. A total of 64 implant sites (7.6%) in 39 patients (10.2%) showed signs of peri-implant mucositis. In addition, 17 implants (2.0%) in 14 patients (3.6%) revealed signs of peri-implantitis, of which five implants were in the control group (2.09%) whereas 12 implants were in the study group (1.98%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.8405). More than half of the patients with peri-implantitis had a history of periodontitis. Three implants were lost due to peri-implantitis and four implants failed for other reasons, resulting in an overall success rate of 99.2% in 846 implants. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study it seems that the use of autologous bone still is a relevant option when performing augmentation procedures because of the low prevalence of peri-implantitis.

Prevalence and extent of Alveolar dehiscence and fenestration in Class I hyperdivergent subjects with different buccolingual inclinations of maxillary molar teeth: a CBCT study

Buccolingual position of teeth could affect the prevalence of alveolar bone defects. Presence of alveolar defects may have a deleterious effect on orthodontic treatment. The aim was to assess the prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration in Class I hyperdivergent subjects and correlate it with buccolingual inclinations(BL) of maxillary first molar teeth. Methods: This retrospective study involved 80 CBCTs of class I hyperdivergent subjects divided into two groups - group A (n=33) buccolingual inclination >9º and group B (n=47) buccolingual inclination <9º. Prevalence and extent of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestrations were measured in CBCTs using OSIRIX Lite software. Descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test and Spearman correlation were done for evaluating intergroup differences and correlation with Buccolingual inclination. Results: Overall prevalence of dehiscence and fenestration in maxillary first molars was 60.95% and 5% respectively. In the buccal alveolar bone, prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group A (84.6%) for 16 and in the lingual alveolar bone prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group B (71.4%) for 26 . On intergroup comparison, the extent of lingual alveolar bone dehiscence (26) in group B was significantly higher (p value <0.05) than in group A. No significant correlation between the extent of dehiscence and fenestration with buccolingual inclination of molar teeth was noted. Conclusion: Molar teeth with BL inclinations of more than 9º had higher prevalence of dehiscence on the buccal side and molar teeth with BL inclinations less than 9 degrees had more dehiscence on the lingual side. But no significant correlation of BL inclination with prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration was noted

Effect of unfiltered cigarettes on marginal bone loss of dental implants: A single center 4-year retrospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective clinical study evaluated, by radiographic analysis, the effect of unfiltered and filtered tobacco cigarette smoking on marginal bone loss (MBL) in the subjects with dental implants. METHODS: In a 4-year retrospective clinical study, 419 dental implants were placed in 188 subjects aged 23-76 years who underwent implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. The effects of gender, implant length, implant diameter, implant location, and use of unfiltered and filtered tobacco cigarettes on marginal bone were investigated. MBL was analyzed on the mean, mesial, and distal surfaces of dental implants on periapical radiographs. The results of the data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between MBL difference and gender, implant length, and implant location (P< 0.05). Smokers had significantly higher MBL than nonsmokers, both within and between groups (P< 0.05). There was a significant difference in MBL in the mesial region in unfiltered cigarette smokers compared to filtered cigarette smokers (P= 0.013). There was a significant increase in MBL in the mesial and distal region compared to heavy smokers of cigarettes without filters (>20 cigarettes/day) and heavy smokers of cigarettes with filters (>20 cigarettes/day) (P< 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, tobacco smoking had a negative effect on marginal bone loss. There was a significant increase in marginal bone loss on the mesial and distal surfaces, especially in unfiltered heavy tobacco smokers (>20 cigarettes/day).

Periodontal conditions in a 65-year-old population and prevalence of periodontitis according to three different bone level thresholds.

AIMS: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to describe the prevalence and severity of periodontal disease in a 65-year-old population in Oslo, Norway, and to investigate to what extent the radiographic bone level threshold for periodontitis case definition influences the prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of 454 subjects underwent a clinical and radiographic examination and answered a questionnaire regarding general health, medications, and smoking habits. Clinical periodontal parameters (periodontal pocket depths, bleeding on probing, mobility, and furcation involvement) and radiographic bone loss were used to identify periodontitis cases and to assess periodontal stage and grade. RESULTS: Of the 454 participants, 52.6% were defined as "periodontitis cases". Of the total study population "unstable cases of recurrent periodontitis" were present in 38.1%, 16.5% of the participants were assigned to stage II, 32.8% to stage III, and 3.3% to stage IV. When lowering the radiographic bone loss cutoff from > 3 mm to > 2 mm or > 1 mm the prevalence of periodontitis increased to 91.9% and 99.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontitis was common among 65 year-olds living in Oslo, and in the majority of those with periodontitis, the disease was recurrent and unstable. This study also shows that the choice of bone loss cutoff for defining a periodontitis case affects the prevalence estimates to a large extent. In addition, this study addresses weaknesses in the use of the consensus report of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions for epidemiologic studies in its current form.

Peri-implant marginal bone loss and systemic statin use: A retrospective cohort pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyze clinical parameters of peri-implantitis in human subjects exposed and non-exposed to use of systemic statins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort pilot study compared patient records of 60 exposed individuals to 196 non-exposed individuals as of 2011 throughout 2017. Source of records were specialist and general dentistry clinics in Public Dental Service, Stockholm County, Sweden. Extent/severity of peri-implantitis and peri-implant bone loss were registered as well as intake of systemic statins. Background variables considered were bleeding on probing, bone-loss, age, gender, earlier periodontitis, prosthetic quality, and smoking. Stepwise linear and logistic regression analysis at the individual level was adopted in order to study the influence of statin use on the severity of peri-implantitis and the incidence of peri-implant bone loss. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Peri-implant bone loss was significantly correlated to use of statin after compensation for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: The results render an actual effect of statins on peri-implant bone loss plausible. Further research is warranted.

Association between peri-implantitis and cardiovascular diseases: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the association between peri-implantitis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients with dental implants were recruited to evaluate the prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients with or without CVD (CVD group, n = 82, control group, n = 46, respectively). Diagnosis of peri-implantitis followed the 2017 World Workshop guidelines and the severity was defined as mild, moderate, and severe form when the radiographic bone loss (RBL) was <2, 2 to 4, and >4 mm. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test the association between two diseases. RESULTS: A trend of higher prevalence of peri-implantitis defined by detectable RBL beyond the physiologic bone remodeling was found in the CVD group (64.6%) when compared with the controls (56.5%). A significant higher prevalence (48.8%) of moderate to severe peri-implantitis was identified in CVD compared with controls(30.4%) with a significant crude association between moderate to severe peri-implantitis and CVD (odds ratio = 2.18, 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.67; P = 0.04). The CVD group had a trend of higher prevalence of deep pockets (≥7 mm) and higher numbers of sites with bleeding on probing  (>66%) when compared with controls (P > 0.05). However, after controlling for multiple confounders including age, hypertension, smoking, family history of heart attack, and periodontitis, the significant association was not found. CONCLUSIONS: CVD group had significantly higher prevalence of moderate to severe peri-implantitis (RBL ≥2 mm). The association between the two diseases did not exist after controlling multiple confounders for CVD. Future studies with a larger sample size controlling for the patient- and implant-related confounders are needed to better understand the link between peri-implantitis and CVD.

Suporte periodontal em diferentes idades em humanos: revisão sistemática e metanálise / Periodontal support at different ages in humans: systematic review and meta-analysis

A tomada de decisões na prática da clínica odontológica está baseada na utilização de parâmetros periodontais como o nível de osso alveolar e de inserção clínica, desconsiderando a idade do paciente, podendo resultar em extrações desnecessárias de dentes que ainda possuem suporte periodontal capaz de manter o elemento dentário inserido no alvéolo, chegando a 70 anos de vida com pelo menos 1/3 do comprimento da raiz radicular com suporte ósseo. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática com metanálise foi verificar qual é o nível de osso alveolar ou de inserção clínica periodontal em população adulta, ao longo da vida, identificando a prevalência de indivíduos ou de sítios periodontais que apresentam perda de inserção clínica (CAL) ≥ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 e a diferença de suporte periodontal entre dentes remanescentes e extraídos. O método empregado foi a busca estratégica nas bases PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Google Scholar, catálogo CAPES, de estudos seccionais (inquéritos epidemiológicos) que utilizaram amostras de base populacional ou estudos de coorte, publicados de 1940 a 2020, em qualquer idioma. Os estudos foram exportados para o EndNote 20.3, com seleção e extração de dados realizada por duas revisoras independentes e avaliação de risco de viés pela ferramenta JBI. O tratamento estatístico foi realizado com software R Project 1.3 e RevMan 5. Os resultados foram a identificação de 9952 estudos, 740 excluídos na identificação, 8996 na triagem, restando 216 elegíveis, incluídos 21 na revisão. Obteve-se na metanálise medida de prevalência sumária de indivíduos com CAL ≥ 3 de 0.86% (IC 95%, 0.71-0.94); CAL ≥ 4 de (0.18-0.47), CAL ≥ 5 de 0.40 % (IC 95%, 0.19-0.67), CAL ≥ 7 de 0.06 (0.02-0.13) por idade 20-40, 41-60, 71+ anos. Houve associação significativa entre perda de inserção de CAL ≥ 1 mm e local de estudos (continente americano), sendo 91.41% da variância real dos estudos explicada pela idade. A variação de CAL em grupo < 50 anos foi de 0.62 (0.03) a 2.39 (1.27) mm, e > 50 anos, de 1.46 (0.05) a 4.90 (1.70) mm. A variação de perda óssea alveolar (ABL) foi de 20 a 79 anos, 0.2 (0.03) a 8.8 (0.5) mm; 31-65 anos, 1.32 (0.36) a 2.81 (0.93) mm. A medida sumária de diferença de média de CAL entre dentes extraídos e remanescentes foi de 1.84 (1.14-2.54) mm, sem diferença significativa dos subgrupos < 50 anos e 50 anos ou mais. A maioria dos estudos foi classificada como alto risco de viés e a avaliação GRADE do nível de certeza da evidência foi classificada como muito baixa.. A conclusão foi de que a taxa de perda óssea por década de vida, a partir dos 20 anos é fundamental para a avaliação da progressão de doença periodontal e deve ser mantida entre 0.38 a 1.5 mm para que se alcance 70 anos de vida com dente apresentando suporte periodontal. Recomenda-se a realização de mais estudos longitudinais que avaliem idade e determinantes sociais como confundidores da relação doença periodontal e desfechos de CAL ou ABL.

Decision-making in clinical dental practice is based on the use of periodontal parameters such as the level of alveolar bone and clinical attachment, disregarding the patient's age, which may result in unnecessary extractions of teeth that still have periodontal support capable of maintaining the element. tooth inserted into the socket, reaching 70 years of age with at least 1/3 of the root root length with bone support. The objective of this systematic review was to verify the level of alveolar bone or periodontal clinical attachment in an adult population, throughout life, identifying the prevalence of individuals or periodontal sites that present clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 mm and the difference in periodontal support between the remaining and extracted teeth. The method used was a strategic search in PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Google Scholar, CAPES catalog, of cross-sectional epidemiological studies (epidemiological surveys) using the population-based sample or cohort studies, published from 1940 to 2020, in any language. The studies were exported to EndNote 20.3, with data selection and extraction performed by two masked reviewers and risk of bias assessment by the JBI tools. Statistical treatment was performed using the free software R Project 1.3 and RevMan 5. The results were the identification of 9952 studies, 740 excluded in the identification, 8996 in the screening, leaving 205 eligible, and 21 articles were included in the review. In the meta-analysis, a summary prevalence measure of individuals with CAL ≥ 3 of 0.86% (95% CI, 0.71-0.94) was obtained; CAL ≥ 4 of 0.18-0.47, CAL ≥ 5 of 0.40% (95% CI, 0.19-0.67), CAL ≥ 7 of 0.06 (0.02-0.13) by age 20-40, 41-60, 71+ years. There was a significant association between CAL insertion loss ≥ 1 mm and study location (american continent), with 91.41% of the real variance of the studies explained by age. The range of CAL in the < 50 years group was from 0.62 (0.03) to 2.39 (1.27) mm, and > 50 years, from 1.46 (0.05) to 4.90 (1.70) mm. The ABL (Alveolar Bone Loss) range was from 20 to 79 years from 0.2 (0.03) to 8.8 (0.5) mm and from 31 to 65 years from 1.32 (0.36) to 2.81 (0.93) mm. The summary measure of mean difference in CAL between extracted and remaining teeth was 1.84 (1.14-2.54) mm, with no a significant difference between the age subgroups < 50 years and 50 years and over. Most studies were rated as high risk of bias and the GRADE assessment of the confidence level of the evidence was rated as very low. The conclusion was that the rate of bone loss per decade of life, from the age of 20 onwards, is fundamental for the assessment of the progression of periodontal disease and should be maintained between 0.38 and 1.5 mm in order to reach 70 years of life with a tooth showing periodontal support. Further longitudinal studies are recommended to assess age and social determinants as confounders of the relationship between periodontal disease and CAL or ABL outcomes.

Association between Periodontal Disease and Comorbidities in Saudi's Eastern Province.

The incidence of periodontal diseases is associated with multiple comorbidities that influence a patient's treatment planning. This study evaluates the relation between periodontal disease and multiple comorbidities reported in the Saudi population from the Eastern province. This study was conducted on 190 patients, who visited the periodontology clinics at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. Demographic data, smoking habits, past medical and dental histories, blood pressure, random blood glucose, and recent haemoglobin A1c were recorded. A comprehensive periodontal examination included the number of missing teeth, pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and mobility of all teeth except third molars. Radiographic bone loss was measured on standardized full-mouth periapical radiographs. Multivariable regression models were calculated aiming to see the association between different comorbidities and alveolar bone loss with confounders controlled. Out of 190 periodontitis patients, 56 (29.5%) were males and 134 (70.5%) were females. More than half of the patients (60%) were between 26 and 50 years, 30% of them had diabetes, and 18% were smokers. The risk of alveolar bone loss was higher in persons who had diabetes and those who had both diabetes and coronary heart disease than those who did not, although the association was not statistically significant (B = 1.26, 95%CI = -0.30, 2.82, and B = 2.86, 95%CI = -1.25, 6.96, respectively). The risk of alveolar bone loss was significantly higher among persons with diabetes and hypertension (B = 2.82 and 95%CI = 0.89, 4.75). Collectively, the risk of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients increases with diabetes in the presence of other comorbidities regardless of smoking or gender.

An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study.

To evaluate implant loss (IL) and marginal bone loss (MBL); follow-up period of up to 10 years after prosthetic loading. Retrospective multi-centre cross-sectional cohort study. Double analysis: (1) all the implants (n = 456) were analysed; (2) to allow for possible cluster error, one implant per patient (n = 143) was selected randomly. Statistical analysis: Spearman's correlation coefficient; Kruskal-Wallis (post-hoc U-Mann-Whitney); Chi-square (post-hoc Haberman). (1) Analysing all the implants (456): IL was observed in patients with past periodontitis (6 vs. 2.2%, p < 0.05), short implants (12 vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) and when using regenerative surgery (11.3 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001); greater MBL was observed among smokers (0.39 ± 0.52 vs. 0.2 ± 0.29, p < 0.01), maxillary implants (0.28 ± 0.37 vs. 0.1 ± 0.17, p < 0.0001), anterior region implants (0.32 ± 0.36 vs. 0.21 ± 0.33, p < 0.001), external connection implants (0.2 ± 0.29 vs. 0.63 ± 0.59, p < 0.0001), and 2-3 years after loading (p < 0.0001). (2) analysing the cluster (143): IL was observed in smokers (18.8 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05), splinted fixed crowns (12.9%, p < 0.01), short implants (22.2 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.01) and when using regenerative surgery (19.2 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01); greater MBL was observed in maxillary implants (0.25 ± 0.35 vs. 0.11 ± 0.18, p < 0.05), in the anterior region (p < 0.05), in the first 3 years (p < 0.01), in external connection implants (0.72 ± 0.71 vs. 0.19 ± 0.26, p < 0.01) and in short implants (0.38 ± 0.31 vs. 0.2 ± 0.32, p < 0.05). There is greater risk in smokers, patients with past periodontal disease, external connection implants, the use of short implants and when regenerative techniques are used. To prevent MBL and IL, implantologists should be very meticulous in indicating implants in patients affected by these host factors.

Assessment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Conditions around Short and Ultra-Short Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A 3-Year Retrospective Study on Periodontally Healthy Patients and Patients with a History of Periodontal Disease.

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate implant survival, marginal bone loss and peri-implant complications in 326 short and ultra-short implants. Implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions of 140 patients with (PP) and without (NPP) a history of periodontal disease. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at 3-year recall appointments. The 8.0, 6.0 and 5.0 mm-length implants placed in PP and NPP were respectively 43.75% and 38.46%, 35.10% and 34.19%, 21.15% and 27.35%; 325 implants (one early failure) were rehabilitated with single crowns in 139 patients. Overall implant survival after 3 years of follow-up was 97.55%, 98.08% and 96.61% for PP and NPP (p = 0.46). Crestal bone level variations were not statistically different among PP and NPP; 15.41% of implants presented signs of mucositis, 14.71% and 16.67% in PP and NPP (p = 0.64). Setting the threshold for bone loss at 2 mm after 36 months, peri-implantitis prevalence was 2.2%, 1.96% and 2.63% in PP and NPP (p = 0.7). Overall implant success was 82.39%, 83.33% and 80.7% for PP and NPP (p = 0.55). Short-term outcomes suggest that short and ultra-short locking-taper implants can successfully be restored with single crowns in the posterior jaws both in PP and NPP.

Alveolar Bone Loss, Tooth Loss and Oral Cancer Mortality in Older Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: There has been growing interest in the association between periodontitis and systemic disease. In recent years, however, inconsistent results have also been found by case-control studies for the role of periodontitis in the development of oral cancer. This study aimed to examine whether periodontitis was an independent risk factor for oral cancer with a ≥75-year age group cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2014, 1385 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent radiographic examination were included in this retrospective cohort study. We collected demographic information and comorbid health conditions from local health authorities. Participants were followed up until either the occurrence of mortality, or the end of the study on December 31, 2018. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risk hazard models were used to examine the association between periodontitis and oral cancer mortality. RESULTS: Periodontitis and loss of teeth were significantly associated with oral cancer mortality. Compared to oral cancer mortality in healthy subjects, the HR and 95% CI in patients with mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were 4.46 (0.94-21.06), 5.16 (1.14-23.39), and 6.65 (1.51-29.36), respectively. The HR (95% CI) was 1.05 (1.01-1.09) for tooth loss after controlling for potential confounding factors. All the increases in risk persisted in patients aged ≥80 years. CONCLUSION: The present study provides substantial evidence that poor periodontal health is associated with oral cancer mortality. It is necessary to underline the importance of considering periodontitis in the prevention of oral cancer, particularly in the older patients.

Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: a 10 year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To assess long-term results of implants (XiVE/Frialit-2 Synchro) in a private periodontal practice according to survival and success rates (biological and technical complications) and to detect possible influencing factors, retrospectively. METHODS: Implant placement of at least one implant took place 10 years ±6 months before clinical and radiographic re-examination. Incidence of implant loss as main and incidence of mucositis/ peri-implantitis as secondary outcome were detected. Also, patient-related and implant-related influencing factors were determined by regression analyses. RESULTS: 100 patients (59.0% female) with 242 implants were included into analysis. Survival rate was 94.0% (XiVE: 97.7%; Frialit-2-Synchro: 66.7%). Mucositis was found in 77.6% of all patients, moderate/severe peri-implantitis in 16.3%. In logistic regression analyses statistically significant influencing factors for implant loss was implant type (p < 0.001), for mucositis a wider implant diameter (p = 0.0438) and a high modified Plaque Index (p = 0.0253), for peri-implantits number of implants per patient (p = 0.0075) and a wider implant diameter (p = 0.0079). Technical complications were found in 47 implants (19.4%). CONCLUSIONS: XiVE implants showed a high survival rate over a 10-year follow-up, on the other hand Frialit-2 Synchro implants had worse survival rates. Success rates regarding biological complications are in line with other implant systems.

Tooth loss in aggressive periodontitis: Results 25 years after active periodontal therapy in a private practice.

AIM: To assess tooth loss in patients with aggressive periodontitis (AgP) 10-35 years after active periodontal therapy (APT) in a private practice and to detect possible factors influencing tooth loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 100 patients with AgP, tooth loss was recorded over a median follow-up period of 25.5 years after APT, retrospectively. Patient- and tooth-level factors were assessed with a Cox frailty regression model. RESULTS: Of 2,380 teeth, 227 were lost during a median follow-up time of 25.5 years (2.3 ± 3.6 teeth/patient, range 0-17 teeth), resulting in a mean tooth loss rate of 0.09 teeth/patient/year. At patient-level, statistically significant factors for tooth loss were smoking (p = .039) and the baseline diagnosis generalized AgP (p < .001). Influencing factors at tooth-level were location in the maxilla (p = .003), baseline bone loss (p < .001), molars (p < .001) and premolars (p < .001) as well as abutment teeth (p = .009). CONCLUSION: Tooth loss occurred rarely in patients with AgP treated in a private practice over a long-time period. Annual tooth loss rates are comparable with those described in university settings. Smoking, generalized form of AgP, location/type of tooth, baseline bone loss and abutment status could be detected as factors impacting upon tooth loss.

Prevalence of horizontal alveolar changes in edentulous patients: a retrospective tomographic study

Abstract Horizontal bone loss after tooth extraction is a common finding that demands bone reconstruction in various cases. The aim of this study was to assess the horizontal alveolar status in partially and completely edentulous patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). In total, 1516 CBCT scans of 1404 adult patients were analyzed. Assessment of the images was performed in accordance with the previously published horizontal alveolar change (HAC) classification, which categorizes horizontal bone defects into four classes: HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4 (from the least severe to the most severe condition). Analysis of 1048 scans from partially edentulous patients presented a distribution of 63.55%, 22.14%, 13.36% and 0.95% in HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4, respectively. Analysis of 468 scans from completely edentulous patient images presented a distribution of 19.87%, 28.63%, 41.67% and 9.83% in HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4, respectively. Based on these results, as in HAC 4, no cancellous bone was found between the cortical buccal and lingual/palatal bone plates, it seems reasonable to state that the absence of cancellous bone is higher in completely edentulous patients than in partially edentulous patients. Therefore, the absence of cancellous bone seems to be higher in completely edentulous than in partially edentulous patients.

A retrospective study: Do all impacted teeth cause pathology?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the incidence of impacted teeth and the frequency of pathologies they caused by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 608 patients' CBCT images were analyzed retrospectively. Detected impacted teeth were classified as incisor, canine, premolar, molar, third molar, and supernumerary teeth. The pathologies caused by impacted teeth are classified as cysts or tumors, tooth decay, root resorptions, and periodontal bone loss. RESULTS: Impacted teeth were detected in 34.37% of the 608 CBCT images included in the study. The distribution of impacted teeth was 9.4% incisor, 29.4% canine, 9.9% premolar, 2.9% molar, 9.3% supernumerary, and 39.9% third molar teeth. Approximately 63.7% of the impacted teeth caused a pathology. The pathology that was most commonly caused by impacted teeth was periodontal bone loss (44.4%), and respectively others were root resorptions (33.3%), cysts or tumors (8.6%), and tooth decay (2.3%). The most common cause of this pathology was right mandibular third molar teeth. CONCLUSION: Impacted teeth were common and they often caused a pathology. CBCT is a useful device to assess the impacted teeth. When the impacted teeth are evaluated, each tooth should be assessed within itself. If the impacted teeth are not caused by pathology, they can be kept under control.

[Dental complications during orthodontic preparation and orthognathic surgery]. / Complications dentaires de la préparation orthodontique et de la chirurgie orthognathique.

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic-surgical treatment can present risks to the dental organ and the periodontium. Despite the low incidence of such cases, these complications can compromise a treatment plan. Practitioners should be aware of these potential complications, take them into account during treatment in order to reduce their negative impact and, if necessary, manage them by orthodontic-surgical collaboration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this article, the authors present several potential complications that can occur during treatment. CONCLUSION: The information given to the patient about the risks inherent in the implementation of an orthodontic-surgical protocol must necessarily include the risks of lesion to the dental organ and the periodontium.

Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30N·cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept: retrospective study.

The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the short-term implant success rate and marginal bone loss in full-arch fixed prosthetic maxillary rehabilitations supported by implants in immediate function with the All-on-4 treatment concept placed with insertion torque of <30N·cm or ≥30N·cm. This study included 83 patients (69 female, 14 male) with 332 implants placed (120 inserted with <30N·cm and 212 inserted with ≥30N·cm) who were treated between January 2010 and March 2013. Outcome measures were implant success and marginal bone loss at 1year of follow-up. Ten patients (12.0%; 13 implants inserted with <30N·cm and 27 implants with ≥30N·cm) were lost to follow-up. The cumulative implant success rate was 97.5% at the patient level, and 98.3% for implants inserted with <30N·cm and 97.5% for implants inserted with ≥30N·cm. The mean±standard deviation marginal bone loss at 1year was 1.14±0.38mm for implants inserted with <30N·cm and 1.39±0.49mm for implants inserted with ≥30N·cm (significant difference; P<0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). These results indicate that implants with insertion torques of <30N·cm may render comparable success rates and marginal bone loss at 1year compared to implants inserted with insertion torques of ≥30N·cm.