Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 454
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Glob Health ; 10(3): e380-e389, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in globe-preserving treatments, improvements in retinoblastoma outcomes are inconsistent across income levels and geographical locations. We aimed to investigate trends in global retinoblastoma survival and globe preservation during the past 40 years. We also examined associated socioeconomic and health-care factors and global survival disparity. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis by screening articles in any language in nine databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, OpenGrey, Global Burden of Disease, Global Health Data Exchange, Global Index Medicus, and International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness) published between Jan 1, 1981, and Oct 8, 2021. We screened for articles that described retinoblastoma overall survival or globe salvage, or both. All reported studies were subsequently stratified into four periods: 1980-89, 1990-99, 2000-09, and 2010-20. Indicators on socioeconomic and health-care factors were extracted from the World Bank and WHO. Ophthalmology-related indicators were further parsed from the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness. Between-study heterogeneities by income level were assessed by mixed-effect meta-analysis. Associations of retinoblastoma outcome with socioeconomic and health-care factors and factors for survival prediction were investigated by multivariable linear regressions. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221556. FINDINGS: Our search identified 14 621 articles, of which 314 studies were included for analysis after screening, including 38 130 patients from 80 regions globally presenting during 1980-2020. 255 articles were entered for time-trend meta-analysis, covering 29 106 patients from 73 countries. Both overall survival (from 79% [95% CI 74-84] to 88% [83-93]; p=0·017) and globe salvage rate (from 22% [14-32] to 44% [36-52]; p=0·0003) improved significantly over the four decades. Wide disparities were observed between higher-income and lower-income countries. Overall survival, globe salvage, and globe salvage for advanced intraocular disease correlated positively with income level. Higher overall survival was associated with lower Gini index (p=0·0001) and with populations that had smaller percentages living in rural areas (p=0·0005). Higher globe salvage was associated with better health-care financing and accessibility (p=0·030). Overall survival (p=0·0024) and globe salvage (p=0·022) were both associated positively with education level. Survival gaps were observed in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast and southwest Asia. INTERPRETATION: Retinoblastoma treatment outcomes have improved globally over the past four decades but large disparities persist between higher-income and lower-income countries, with some areas having major survival gaps. Targeted health-care policy making with increased health-care financing and accessibility are needed in low-income and lower-middle-income countries to improve retinoblastoma outcomes worldwide. FUNDING: Health and Medical Research Fund (Hong Kong) and Children Cancer's Foundation (Hong Kong).


Assuntos
Saúde Global , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Retinoblastoma/terapia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8): 1426-1430.e3, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35026367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) to evaluate current practice management strategies among AAHKS members. METHODS: An application was used by AAHKS members to answer both multiple-choice and yes or no questions. Specific questions were asked regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on practice patterns. RESULTS: There was a dramatic acceleration in same day total joint arthroplasty with 85% of AAHKS members performing same day total joint arthroplasty. More AAHKS members remain in private practice (46%) than other practice types, whereas fee for service (34%) and relative value units (26%) are the major form of compensation. At the present time, 93% of practices are experiencing staffing shortages, and these shortages are having an impact on surgical volume. CONCLUSION: This survey elucidates the current practice patterns of AAHKS members. The pandemic has had a significant impact on some aspects of practice activity. Future surveys need to monitor changes in practice patterns over time.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , COVID-19 , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Ortopedia , Gerenciamento da Prática Profissional , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Ortopedia/economia , Ortopedia/organização & administração , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Gerenciamento da Prática Profissional/economia , Gerenciamento da Prática Profissional/organização & administração , Gerenciamento da Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/economia , Prática Profissional/organização & administração , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 2, 2022 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979933

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-Intubated Thoracic Surgery (NITS) is becoming increasingly adopted all over the world. Although it is mainly used for pleural operations,, non-intubated parenchymal lung surgery has been less frequently reported. Recently, NITS utilization seems to be increased also in Italy, albeit there are no multi-center studies confirming this finding. The objective of this survey is to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the performance of NITS in Italy. METHODS: In 2018 a web-based national survey on Non-Intubated management including both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists was carried out. Reference centers have been asked to answer 32 questions. Replies were collected from June 26 to November 31, 2019. RESULTS: We raised feedbacks from 95% (55/58) of Italian centers. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents perform NITS but only 38% of them used this strategy for parenchymal surgery. These procedures are more frequently carried out in patients with severe comorbidities and/or with poor lung function. Several issues as obesity, previous non-invasive ventilation and/or oxygen therapy are considered contraindications to NITS. The regional anesthesia technique most used to provide intra- and postoperative analgesia was the paravertebral block (37%). Conversion to general anesthesia is not anecdotal (31% of answerers). More than half of the centers believed that NITS may reduce postoperative intensive care unit admissions. Approximately a quarter of the centers are conducting trials on NITS and, three quarters of the respondent suppose that the number of these procedures will increase in the future. CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing interest in Italy for NITS and this survey provides a clear view of the national management framework of these procedures.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Torácica/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália
4.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): e75-e81, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649458

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Identify key demographic factors and modes of follow-up in surgical survey response. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surveys are widely used in surgery to assess patient and procedural outcomes, but response rates vary widely which compromises study quality. Currently there is no consensus as to what the average response rate is and which factors are associated with higher response rates. METHODS: The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) was systematically searched from Januray 1, 2007 until February 1, 2020 using the following strategy: (((questionnaire) OR survey) AND "response rate") AND (surgery OR surgical). Original survey studies from surgical(-related) fields reporting on response rate were included. Through one-way analysis of variance we present mean response rate per survey mode over time, number of additional contacts, country of origin, and type of interviewee. RESULTS: The average response is 70% over 811 studies in patients and 53% over 1746 doctor surveys. In-person surveys yield an average 76% response rate, followed by postal (65%) and online (46% web-based vs 51% email) surveys. Patients respond significantly more often than doctors to surveys by mail (P < 0.001), email (P = 0.003), web-based surveys (P < 0.001) and mixed mode surveys (P = 0.006). Additional contacts significantly improve response rate in email (P = 0.26) and web-based (P = 0.041) surveys in doctors. A wide variation in response rates was identified between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Every survey is unique, but the main commonality between studies is response rate. Response rates appear to be highly dependent on type of survey, follow-up, geography, and interviewee type.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/ética , Humanos
5.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 307, 2021 12 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a multidimensional condition characterized by loss of functional reserve, which results in increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes following surgery. Anesthesiologists can reduce adverse outcomes when risk factors are recognized early and dedicated care pathways are operational. As the frail elderly population is growing, we investigated the perspective on the aging population, familiarity with the frailty syndrome and current organization of perioperative care for elderly patients among Dutch anesthesiologists. METHODS: A fifteen-item survey was distributed among anesthesiologists and residents during the annual meeting of the Dutch Society of Anesthesiology. The first section included questions on self-reported competence on identification of frailty, acquaintance with local protocols and attitude towards the increasing amounts of elderly patients presenting for surgery. The second part included questions on demographic features of the participant such as job position, experience and type of hospital. Answers are presented as percentages, using the total number of replies for the question per group as a denominator. RESULTS: A sample of 132 surveys was obtained. The increasing number of elderly patients was primarily perceived as challenging by 76% of respondents. Ninety-nine percent agreed that frailty should influence anesthetic management, while 85% of respondents claimed to feel competent to recognize frailty. Thirty-four percent of respondents reported the use of a dedicated pathway in the preoperative approach of frail elderly patients. However, only 30% of respondents reported to know where to find the frailty screening in the patient file and appointed that frailty is not consistently documented. Interestingly, only 43% of respondents reported adequate collaboration with geriatricians. This could include for example a standardized preoperative multidisciplinary approach or dedicated pathway for the elderly patient. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that the increasing number of frail elderly patients is perceived as important and relevant for anesthetic management. Opportunities lie in improving the organization and effectuation of perioperative care by more consistent involvement of anesthesiologists.


Assuntos
Anestesiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Anestesiologia/métodos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Países Baixos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Fatores de Risco
6.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259601, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797824

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cases of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continue to spread around the world even one year after the declaration of a global pandemic. Those with weakened immune systems, due to immunosuppressive medications or disease, may be at higher risk of COVID-19. This includes individuals with autoimmune diseases, cancer, transplants, and dialysis patients. Assessing the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 in this population has been challenging. While administrative databases provide data with minimal selection and recall bias, clinical and behavioral data is lacking. To address this, we are collecting self-reported survey data from a randomly selected subsample with and without COVID-19, which will be linked to administrative health data, to better quantify the risk of COVID-19 infection associated with immunosuppression. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using administrative and laboratory data from British Columbia (BC), Canada, we established a population-based case-control study of all individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Each case was matched to 40 randomly selected individuals from two control groups: individuals who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., negative controls) and untested individuals from the general population (i.e., untested controls). We will contact 1000 individuals from each group to complete a survey co-designed with patient partners. A conditional logistic regression model will adjust for potential confounders and effect modifiers. We will examine the odds of COVID-19 infection according to immunosuppressive medication or disease type. To adjust for relevant confounders and effect modifiers not available in administrative data, the survey will include questions on behavioural variables that influence probability of being tested, acquiring COVID-19, and experiencing severe outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board [H20-01914]. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, open access peer-reviewed journals, COVID-19 research repositories and dissemination channels used by our patient partners.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Terapia de Imunossupressão/estatística & dados numéricos , Colúmbia Britânica , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 1273, 2021 Nov 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34823486

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology with great promise but uncertain clinical value. Previous research has documented variability in academic oncologists' perceptions and use of GTT, but little is known about community oncologists' perceptions of GTT and how perceptions relate to clinicians' intentions to use GTT. METHODS: Community oncology physicians (N = 58) participating in a statewide initiative aimed at improving access to large-panel GTT completed surveys assessing their confidence in using GTT, attitudes regarding the value of GTT, perceptions of barriers to GTT implementation, and future intentions to use GTTs. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to characterize these perceptions and to explore the relationships between them. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in clinicians' perceptions of GTT. Clinicians generally had moderate confidence in their ability to use GTT, but lower confidence in patients' ability to understand test results and access targeted treatment. Clinicians had positive attitudes regarding the value of GTT. Clinicians' future intentions to use GTT were associated with greater confidence in using GTT and greater perceived barriers to implementing GTT, but not with attitudes about the value of GTT. CONCLUSIONS: Community oncologists' perceptions of large-panel genomic tumor testing are variable, and their future intentions to use GTT are associated with both their confidence in and perceived barriers to its use, but not with their attitudes towards GTT. More research is needed to understand other factors that determine how oncologists perceive and use GTT in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/genética , Oncologistas/psicologia , Compreensão , Feminino , Previsões , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hematologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Intenção , Maine , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Autoimagem , Incerteza
8.
Bull Cancer ; 108(12S): S87-S89, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756418

RESUMO

In an attempt to harmonize clinical practices among francophone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held its eleventh annual workshop series in September 2020 in Lille. This event brought together practitioners from across Europe. Our article discusses the updates and modifications for the 2021 version of the national patient follow-up care logbook.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Registros de Saúde Pessoal , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/normas , Aloenxertos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
9.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 5(4)2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34350375

RESUMO

Background: Traditionally, adjuvant treatment for colon cancer has been 6 months of combination chemotherapy. Six phase III trials tested the hypothesis that 3 months is noninferior in efficacy to 6 months and reduces long-term side effects for patients. The results were pooled in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant therapy (IDEA) collaboration. Although this did not meet the noninferiority endpoint, a preplanned subgroup analysis by chemotherapy regimen did demonstrate noninferiority for capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Additionally, risk stratification by T and N stage was defined. Methods: In an effort to understand the real-life impact of these results, 4 months after the IDEA results, an online survey was distributed to clinicians to ask their approach to the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III colon cancer. Results: The survey was completed by 458 clinicians from 12 countries. Assuming that 6 months of treatment was the pretrial standard of care, 89.5% of clinicians reported they had changed practice to prescribe 3 months of treatment for some patients. For patients with low-risk stage III disease, there was a preference for 3 months, and for patients with high-risk stage III disease, most clinicians still prescribed 6 months at that time. Overall, capecitabine and oxaliplatin regimen was the most popular. There were important differences in responses depending on the location of respondent and T and N stage of disease. Conclusion: This survey shows that the IDEA collaboration has been practice changing but reveals important differences in the way results are interpreted by individual clinicians.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Risco
10.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1125): 20210736, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34235964

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to minimise risks of ionising radiation to patients, themselves and staff. This study aims to establish the understanding of radiation practice, legislation and risk by orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: A nationwide online survey of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons was conducted. Participants answered 18 multiple-choice questions assessing level of radiation safety training, basic principles/knowledge of ionising radiation, relevant legislation and operating practice. RESULTS: A total of 406 surgeons completed the survey. 92% reported using intraoperative ionising radiation at least once per week. 38% received no formal training on radiation safety. Knowledge of basic principles of radiation and legislation was limited. There was variable knowledge when labelling an image intensifier machine and choosing its safest orientation. Poor uptake of radiation protection equipment was noted. Only 19% agreed they had adequate training in ionising radiation safety and 27% reported receiving adequate training in equipment emitting ionising radiation in the operating theatre. CONCLUSION: Many orthopaedic surgeons in the UK do not believe they are adequately trained in radiation safety. There is a deficiency amongst practicing surgeons in basic knowledge, relevant legislation and practicalities of the use of ionising radiation in the operating room. This could potentially put patients and health-care professionals at additional risk. We recommend that a standardised national training programme on the basic principles and safety of ionising radiation is implemented for all practicing orthopaedic surgeons. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper is the first UK national survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons and is one of the largest reported internationally.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteção Radiológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiação Ionizante , Reino Unido
11.
Bull Cancer ; 108(10): 940-947, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281729

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer therapy is becoming increasingly developed; their prescription has become a common practice in oncology. However, there is a variability and diversity in prescription practice. Its magnitude has been very little studied in scientific literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Morocco and North Africa to evaluate the practice of prescribing oral chemotherapy. METHODS: The authors conducted a national exhaustive cross-sectional survey, to evaluate the practice of the oral chemotherapy "Capecitabine" type prescription by Moroccan oncologists and to identify strategies to promote an adherence to oral anti-neoplasic therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-one medical oncologists answered out of 118, from public oncology centres (29.7%), Hospital University (58.2%), and private sector (12.1%). Thirty-four of the oncologists replied by email, 33 through phone conversation and 24 by filling paper questionnaires. In total, 32% of the cases were handwritten prescriptions, and 51.6% electronically generated. Forty-six percent of medical oncologists dedicated more time to the oral chemotherapy type Capecitabine prescription versus its intravenous equivalent 5FU. However, 33% medical oncologists take less time to this prescription, and 20.9% of them take the same time. Adherence to oral chemotherapy was evaluated by simply questioning of patients in most of the cases (94%) and 4% of medical oncologist declared that they did not evaluate this adherence. In total, 87.9% of Moroccan medical oncologists revealed that they have not received any specific training in the therapeutic education of the patient with oral anti-cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: In Morocco, there is a great variability in prescription and follow-up practice for patients receiving oral chemotherapy. There is a lack of a national standardization with regards to the procedures of prescribing and monitoring patients to ensure the quality and safety of the oral chemotherapy prescription.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Oral , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Eletrônica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas/estatística & dados numéricos , Marrocos , Fatores de Tempo
12.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 670, 2021 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34090361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The second most common cancer among females in Bangladesh is cervical cancer. The national strategy for cervical cancer needs monitoring to ensure that patients have access to care. In order to provide accurate information to policymakers in Bangladesh and other low and middle income countries, it is vital to assess current service availability and readiness to manage cervical cancer at health facilities in Bangladesh. METHODS: An interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from the World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment Standard Tool was used to collect cross-sectional data from health administrators of 323 health facilities in Bangladesh. Services provided were categorized into domains and service readiness was determined by mean readiness index (RI) scores. Data analysis was conducted using STATA version 13. RESULTS: There were seven tertiary and specialized hospitals, 118 secondary level health facilities, 124 primary level health facilities, and 74 NGO/private hospitals included in the study. Twenty-six per cent of the health facilities provided services to cancer patients. Among the 34 tracer items used to assess cancer management capacity of health facilities, four cervical cancer-specific tracer items were used to determine service readiness for cervical cancer. On average, tertiary and specialized hospitals surpassed the readiness index cutoff of 70% with adequate staff and training (100%), equipment (100%), and diagnostic facilities (85.7%), indicating that they were ready to manage cervical cancer. The mean RI scores for the rest of the health facilities were below the cutoff value, meaning that they were not prepared to provide adequate cervical cancer services. CONCLUSION: The health facilities in Bangladesh (except for some tertiary hospitals) lack readiness in cervical cancer management in terms of guidelines on diagnosis and treatment, training of staff, and shortage of equipment. Given that cervical cancer accounts for more than one-fourth of all female cancers in Bangladesh, management of cervical cancer needs to be available at all levels of health facilities, with primary level facilities focusing on early diagnosis. It is recommended that appropriate standard operating procedures on cervical cancer be developed for each level of health facilities to contribute towards attaining sustainable developmental goals.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Bangladesh , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Desenvolvimento Sustentável , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
13.
Clin Radiol ; 76(11): 820-828, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187681

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate current national imaging practice in myeloma with reference to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (NG35, 2016) and compare results with an initial survey conducted in 2017 (61 participating sites). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All UK radiology departments treating myeloma patients and with a Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Audit Lead were invited to participate. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen hospitals supplied data (54% return rate). Skeletal survey (SS) remains the most-commonly performed first-line imaging test for suspected/confirmed myeloma or plasmacytoma (39%, 45/114 hospitals), followed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) (27%, 31/114) and whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) (19%, 22/114). Integrated positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) was first-line in 14% (16/114). The NICE recommended initial investigation, WBMRI, is currently offered in 27% of surveyed hospitals (<10% in 2017). Ongoing challenges to implementing WBMRI include scanner availability, financial constraints, reporting time, and radiologist training. CONCLUSION: Despite NICE recommendations regarding WBMRI in diagnosis/follow-up of myeloma, SS (poor sensitivity and specificity) remains the most commonly performed first-line test. Radiologists, haematologists, and patients should continue to emphasise the superiority and benefit of modern and more accurate imaging, such that they are prioritised in clinical service planning.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Plasmocitoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Radiologistas , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Reino Unido
14.
Bull Cancer ; 108(12S): S1-S9, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176584

RESUMO

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the only curative therapy for numerous hematological malignancies, carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The patients and families' expectations regarding the procedure, the prognosis uncertainties, as well as the existence of potential new therapeutic possibilities, lead to frequent use of intensive care. Even though the transplant physicians are highly skilled in acute care, their knowledge of palliative approach is limited, making the use of palliative care insufficient and often late. By promoting reflection on the proportionality of care and the patients' quality of life, palliative care may contribute to the allo-HCT patients management. Nevertheless, obstacles to this approach remain. The objective of this work is to propose recommendations to promote the implementation of palliative care into transplant units.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Paliativos , Diretivas Antecipadas , Aloenxertos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Proteínas de Bactérias , Criança , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Deterioração Clínica , Glucosiltransferases , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/psicologia , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Relações Interprofissionais , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Prognóstico , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades Médicas , Assistência Terminal
15.
Rev. argent. cir. plást ; 27(2): 78-81, 20210000. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1357881

RESUMO

La cura avanzada de las heridas complejas se conoce desde 1994, por las guías internacionales para el manejo avanzado de las heridas. Las mismas han demostrado ser costo-efectivas contra la cura tradicional. Aun así, hoy en día, ¿se sigue curando de la manera tradicional las heridas o realmente se realiza la curación avanzada? Se logró determinar cuánto conocen sobre el tema y cuánto lo aplican, enfermeras y médicos de servicios quirúrgicos. Con una simple encuesta, el personal de diferentes servicios quirúrgicos contestó y se observó que un 83% sabe esta alternativa para curar una herida compleja, pero solo un 67% conoce realmente el método. También se vio que un 53% la aplica y el 47% no lo hace por falta de medios, insumos o desconocimiento del método.


The advanced treatment of complex wounds has been known since 1994 by international guidelines for the advanced management of wounds. They have proven to be cost-effective against the traditional cure. Yet, today, do wounds continue to be healed in the traditional way or is advanced healing actually done? We were able to determine how much they know about the subject and how much they apply it, nurses and surgical doctors. With a simple survey, the staff of different surgical services answered and it was observed that 83% know this alternative to heal a complex wound, but only 67% really know the method. It was also found that 53% applied it and 47% did not because of lack of means, inputs or ignorance of the method


Assuntos
Humanos , Cicatrização , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Condutas Terapêuticas Homeopáticas/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Capacitação Profissional
16.
Anaesthesia ; 76(9): 1167-1175, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34005837

RESUMO

Between October 2020 and January 2021, we conducted three national surveys to track anaesthetic, surgical and critical care activity during the second COVID-19 pandemic wave in the UK. We surveyed all NHS hospitals where surgery is undertaken. Response rates, by round, were 64%, 56% and 51%. Despite important regional variations, the surveys showed increasing systemic pressure on anaesthetic and peri-operative services due to the need to support critical care pandemic demands. During Rounds 1 and 2, approximately one in eight anaesthetic staff were not available for anaesthetic work. Approximately one in five operating theatres were closed and activity fell in those that were open. Some mitigation was achieved by relocation of surgical activity to other locations. Approximately one-quarter of all surgical activity was lost, with paediatric and non-cancer surgery most impacted. During January 2021, the system was largely overwhelmed. Almost one-third of anaesthesia staff were unavailable, 42% of operating theatres were closed, national surgical activity reduced to less than half, including reduced cancer and emergency surgery. Redeployed anaesthesia staff increased the critical care workforce by 125%. Three-quarters of critical care units were so expanded that planned surgery could not be safely resumed. At all times, the greatest resource limitation was staff. Due to lower response rates from the most pressed regions and hospitals, these results may underestimate the true impact. These findings have important implications for understanding what has happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, planning recovery and building a system that will better respond to future waves or new epidemics.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , COVID-19 , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido
17.
Bull Cancer ; 108(7-8): 761-770, 2021.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933290

RESUMO

Mucositis is defined as inflammatory and/or ulcerative lesions of the oral and/or gastrointestinal tract. It occurs in approximately 40% to 50% of adults patients receiving conventional chemotherapy and up to 75% of patients receiving high dose chemotherapy as conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It is a toxic side effect, which strongly impairs quality of life and leads to refractory pain, increasing risk of infection and even therapeutic modifications. Despite improvements made, the management of mucositis remains a challenge and is still not consensual. A multicentric survey of practices concerning the preventive and curative management of chemo-induced mucositis in pediatric oncology department in France was carried out using a standardized questionnaire. Results confirm heterogeneous practices and the small progress made during the last decade. This national survey and an analysis of the recent literature leads to propose guidelines for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in children receiving treatment for cancer.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Mucosite/induzido quimicamente , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , França , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Mucosite/complicações , Mucosite/microbiologia , Mucosite/prevenção & controle , Higiene Bucal , Manejo da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos
18.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(10): 696-703, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872625

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a non-invasive diagnostic technique whose use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has spread. A panenteric capsule, PillCam Crohn's (PCC), has recently been developed. We lack information on the availability and use of the CEID and PCC in our environment. METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey among the members of the Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) [Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis] and the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) [Spanish Association of Gastroenterology], consisting of 37 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty members participated, the majority dedicated to IBD (69.3%). 72.8% worked at centres with an IBD unit. 79% had SBCE available at their hospital, 14% referred patients to another centre; 22% had a PCC available, 9% referred patients to another centre. 79.3% of respondents with available SBCE used it in a small percentage of patients with IBD and 15.6% in the majority. The most frequent scenarios were suspicion of Crohn's disease (76.3%), assessment of inflammatory activity (54.7%) and assessment of the extent of the disease (54.7%). More than half (59.7%) preferentially used the Patency capsule to assess intestinal patency. Almost all respondents (99.3%) considered that training resources should be implemented in this technique. CONCLUSIONS: SBCE is widely available in Spanish hospitals for the management of IBD, although its use is still limited. There is an opportunity to increase training in this technique, and consequently its use.


Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/estatística & dados numéricos , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia por Cápsula/educação , Feminino , Gastroenterologia/educação , Humanos , Laxantes/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha
19.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 467, 2021 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The high incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer require new technologies to improve its early diagnosis. This study aims at extracting the medical needs related to the endoscopic technology and the colonoscopy procedure currently used for colorectal cancer diagnosis, essential for designing these demanded technologies. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews and an online survey were used. RESULTS: Six endoscopists were interviewed and 103 were surveyed, obtaining the demanded needs that can be divided into: a) clinical needs, for better polyp detection and classification (especially flat polyps), location, size, margins and penetration depth; b) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system needs, for additional visual information supporting polyp characterization and diagnosis; and c) operational/physical needs, related to limitations of image quality, colon lighting, flexibility of the endoscope tip, and even poor bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows some undertaken initiatives to meet the detected medical needs and challenges to be solved. The great potential of advanced optical technologies suggests their use for a better polyp detection and classification since they provide additional functional and structural information than the currently used image enhancement technologies. The inspection of remaining tissue of diminutive polyps (< 5 mm) should be addressed to reduce recurrence rates. Few progresses have been made in estimating the infiltration depth. Detection and classification methods should be combined into one CAD system, providing visual aids over polyps for detection and displaying a Kudo-based diagnosis suggestion to assist the endoscopist on real-time decision making. Estimated size and location of polyps should also be provided. Endoscopes with 360° vision are still a challenge not met by the mechanical and optical systems developed to improve the colon inspection. Patients and healthcare providers should be trained to improve the patient's bowel preparation.


Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico por Computador , Avaliação das Necessidades , Adulto , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem , Incidência , Iluminação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Clin Radiol ; 76(6): 458-464, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33752881

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate variation in the pre-pandemic use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for oesophageal cancer diagnosis and treatment planning up to 2019, and which factors contributed to this. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A UK-wide online survey of oesophagogastric multidisciplinary team lead clinicians was undertaken to determine perceptions towards, and the use of, EUS to aid staging and treatment planning in oesophageal cancer. RESULTS: Thirty-five responses were received, representing 97 UK National Health Service Trusts/Health Boards. A majority of centres (n=21, 60%) did not have formal written guidance for EUS use. Although all respondents had access to EUS, a perceived lack of utility (n=7) and concerns about delaying treatment start dates (n=8) each restricted EUS use for a fifth of respondents. For most centres (n=24, 68.6%), EUS use is case-specific, whereas for 10 (28.6%) EUS is used for all patients with potentially curable disease. A majority of centres use diagnostic positron-emission tomography for radiotherapy target volume delineation (TVD), whereas 22 (62.9%) use EUS. The factors contributing to decisions to use EUS for staging, TVD and surgical planning varied between centres. The proportion of centre respondents who would request EUS in each of six clinical scenarios varied considerably. CONCLUSION: There were substantial differences in the patient and disease characteristics that are perceived to be indications for EUS use for both staging and treatment planning. Research to clarify in which patients with oesophageal cancer EUS affords benefit is required, as is urgent standardisation of its role in the diagnostic pathway.


Assuntos
Endossonografia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA