Consensus guidelines for the management of pineal region tumours for low- and middle-income countries.

Pineal region tumours are rare and mainly arise at a younger age. They can be categorized into various types: germ cell tumours (GCT), pineal parenchymal tumours (PPT), meningiomas, gliomas, pineoblastoma, pineal parenchymal tumours of intermediate differentiation, papillary tumours of the pineal region, and SMARCB1- mutant desmoplastic myxoid tumour. Within GCT, germinomas are the most prevalent, comprising the majority of tumours in this region, while nongerminomatous GCTs are also present. In rare instances, metastases from other sites may manifest. These tumours often lead to obstructive hydrocephalus and commonly exhibit symptoms related to mass effect, including headache, nausea, vomiting, and impaired gait stability. Different subtypes of pineal region tumours exhibit distinct radiological characteristics, thus imaging remains the primary diagnostic tool. Histologic diagnosis necessitates biopsy, unless in cases of germ cell tumours, particularly germinomas, which can be identified through elevated levels of tumour markers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum. While benign tumours might be effectively treated with radical resection alone, malignant tumours demand additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy following surgical removal.

Pineal/germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Pineal region tumors (PRTs) are tumors arising from the pineal gland and the paraspinal structures. These tumors are rare and heterogeneous that account for 2.8-10.1% and 0.6-3.2% of tumors in children and in all ages, respectively. Almost all types and subtypes of CNS tumors may be diagnosed in this region. These tumors come from cells of the pineal gland (pinealocytes and neuroglial cells), ectopic primordial germ cells (PGC), and cells from adjacent structures. Hence, PRTs are consisted of pineal parenchyma tumors (PPTs), germ cell tumors (GCTs), neuroepithelial tumors (NETs), other miscellaneous types of tumors, cystic tumors (epidermoid, dermoid), and pineal cyst in addition. The symptoms of PRTs correlate to the increased intracranial cranial pressure due to obstructive hydrocephalus and dorsal midbrain compression. The diagnostic imaging studies are mainly MRI of brain (with and without gadolinium) along with a sagittal view of whole spine. Serum and/or CSF AFP/ß-HCG helps to identify GCTs. The treatment of PRTs is consisted of the selection of surgical biopsy/resection, handling of hydrocephalus, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy according to age, tumor location, histopathological/molecular classification, grading of tumors, staging, and threshold value of markers (for GCTs) in addition. METHODS: In this article, we review the following focus points: 1. Background of pineal region tumors. 2. Pineal GCTs and evolution of management. 3. Molecular study for GCTs and pineal parenchymal tumors. 4. Review of surgical approaches to the pineal region. 5. Contribution of endoscopy. 6. Adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combination). 7. RESULTS: In all ages, the leading three types of PRTs in western countries were PPTs (22.7-34.8%), GCTs (27.3-34.4%), and NETs (17.2-28%). In children and young adults, the leading PRTs were invariably in the order of GCTs (40-80.5%), PPTs (7.6-21.6%), NETs (2.4-37.5%). Surgical biopsy/resection of PRTs is important for precision diagnosis and therapy. Safe resection with acceptable low mortality and morbidity was achieved after 1970s because of the advancement of surgical approaches, CSF shunt and valve system, microscopic and endoscopic surgery. Following histopathological diagnosis and classification of types and subtypes of PRTs, in PPTs, through molecular profiling, four molecular groups of pineoblastoma (PB) and their oncogenic driver were identified. Hence, molecular stratified precision therapy can be achieved. CONCLUSION: Modern endoscopic and microsurgical approaches help to achieve precise histopathological diagnosis and molecular classification of different types and subtypes of pineal region tumors for risk-stratified optimal, effective, and protective therapy. In the future, molecular analysis of biospecimen (CSF and blood) along with AI radiomics on tumor imaging integrating clinical and bioinformation may help for personalized and risk-stratified management of patients with pineal region tumors.

Current Open Trials and Molecular Update for Pediatric Embryonal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Embryonal tumors are highly malignant cancers of the central nervous system, with a relatively high incidence in infants and young children. Even with intensive multimodal treatment, the prognosis of many types is guarded, and treatment-related toxicity is significant. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics allowed the discovery of novel entities and inter-tumor subgroups, with opportunities for improved risk-stratification and treatment approaches. SUMMARY: Medulloblastomas separate into four distinct subgroups with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics, and data from recent clinical trials for newly diagnosed medulloblastoma support subgroup-specific treatment approaches. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR), and pineoblastoma, as well as other rare embryonal tumors, can be distinguished from histologically similar tumors by virtue of characteristic molecular findings, with DNA methylation analysis providing a strong adjunct in indeterminate cases. Methylation analysis can also allow further subgrouping of ATRT and pineoblastoma. Despite the dire need to improve outcomes for patients with these tumors, their rarity and lack of actionable targets lead to a paucity of clinical trials and novel therapeutics. KEY MESSAGES: (1) Embryonal tumors can be accurately diagnosed with pediatric-specific sequencing techniques. (2) Medulloblastoma risk stratification and treatment decisions should take into account molecular subgroups. (3) There is a dire need for a novel collaborative clinical trial design to improve outcomes is rare pediatric embryonal tumors.

Clinicopathologic analysis of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: a multi-institutional cohort study by the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group.

PURPOSE: Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs), which were recognized in the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all central nervous system tumors. This rarity and novelty complicate the diagnosis and treatments of PPTID. We therefore aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of this tumor. METHODS: At 11 institutions participating in the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group, data for patients diagnosed with PPTID were collected. Central pathology review and KBTBD4 mutation analysis were applied to attain the diagnostically accurate cohort. RESULTS: PPTID was officially diagnosed in 28 patients: 11 (39%) with WHO grade 2 and 17 (61%) with WHO grade 3 tumors. Median age was 49 years, and the male:female ratio was 1:2.1. Surgery was attempted in all 28 patients, and gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 46% (13/28). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered to, respectively, 82% (23/28) and 46% (13/28). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 64.9% and 70.4% respectively. Female sex (p = 0.018) and GTR (p < 0.01) were found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS and female sex (p = 0.019) was that for OS. Initial and second recurrences were most often leptomeningeal (67% and 100% respectively). 80% (20/25) of patients harbored a KBTBD4 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex and GTR were independent prognostic factors in our patients with PPTID. Leptomeningeal recurrence was observed to be particularly characteristic of this tumor. The rate of KBTBD4 mutation observed in our cohort was acceptable and this could prove the accuracy of our PPTID cohort.

The Prognosis of Pineal Parenchymal Tumors: Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results.

BACKGROUND: Pineal parenchymal tumors are exceedingly rare, and optimal disease management has yet to be defined. In this study, we aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish a predictive model for the prognosis of patients with pineal parenchymal tumors. METHODS: All patients with pineal parenchymal tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 1975 and 2019 were reviewed. Data were summarized, and survival was modeled with Cox regression analyses. In addition, a nomogram predicting 5- and 10-year survival probability for pineal parenchymal tumors was developed and validated. RESULTS: We found 691 pineal parenchymal and 1961 pineal region neoplasms during 1975 and 2019 resulting in an incidence of 35%. In total, 441 patients were excluded due to incomplete data. The final cohort was subdivided into groups based on tumor histology: pineocytomas, pineoblastomas, and pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation. Multivariate Cox analysis identified age and beam radiation as prognostic factors in pineoblastomas. Age, histology, tumor size, extent of resection, radiation, and chemotherapy were selected to build a clinical nomogram. The C-index for the nomogram was 0.795 (95% confidence interval 0.738-0.852). The calibration curves of the 5- and 10-year survival rates showed good agreement between the nomogram predictions and actual observations. CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram is a convenient and precise tool for clinicians to evaluate prognosis of pineal parenchymal tumors.

Pediatric pineal region masses: a single-center experience over 25 years.

PURPOSE: Pineal region tumors (PRT) represent less than 1% of brain neoplasms. The rare and heterogeneous nature of these tumors is reflected in the variety of treatment modalities employed. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all pediatric patients with pineal region tumors between November 1996 and June 2021 was performed. Fifty-six cases of pineal tumors were reviewed for age and symptoms upon presentation, diagnostic methods, imaging characteristics, histological classification, treatment modalities, recurrence, and mortality rates. RESULTS: The average age at diagnosis was 11.3 years. The majority of patients were male (82.1%) and Caucasian (73.2%). The most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 38, 67.9%) and visual problems (n = 34, 60.7%). Hydrocephalus was present in 49 patients (87.5%). Germinoma (n = 20, 35.7%) and non-germinomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT) (n = 17, 30.4%) were the most common tumors. Chemotherapy was employed for 54 patients (96.4%), radiation for 49 (87.5%), and surgical resection for 14 (25.0%). The average duration of treatment was 5.9 months. Progression-free survival was 74.4% at 5 years and 72.0% at 10 years. Overall survival was 85.7% at 5 years and 77.1% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: Treatment of pineal region tumors must be targeted to each patient based on presentation, subtype, presence of hydrocephalus, and extent of disease. Upfront surgical resection is usually not indicated. As advances in oncological care proceed, treatment modalities may continue to improve in efficacy.

Results of the treatment of pineal tumors in children: the Lyon experience.

INTRODUCTION: Pineal tumors are rare and their incidence is of 1% among all pediatric tumors of the central nervous system. Patient survival depends on the histology, the extension of the surgical removal, and the efficacy of the complementary treatment (chemotherapy and cranio-spinal irradiation), as well as the age of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we analyzed 151 pediatric patients treated for pineal tumors from 1997 to 2020 in Lyon, France. All patients were recorded in the French Register of Pineal tumors, which has been centralized and maintained in Lyon since 2010. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that benign tumors have an overall positive prognosis with total surgical removal. Concerning pineal parenchymal tumors, pinealoblastomas have a poor prognosis , especially in children less than three years old. A new pathological classification system allows for a better stratification of patient risk within different groups of patients with pineal tumors. It is also important to note that the identification of DICER 1 syndrome in families with pinealoblastomas warrant further medical investigation. Patients with Germ Cell Tumors have more favorable outcomes, with a global survival rate of 87 % and a pure germinoma survival rate of almost 97%. When analyzing the prognosis of pineal gland gliomas, otherwise known as tectal plate gliomas, pilocytic astrocytomas had a promising prognosis. Otherwise, prognosis of other tectal plate gliomas are related to the grade of malignancy and the efficacy of complementary treatment. Lastly, papillary tumors need a complete removal for the best chance of survival, and Atypical teratoid/ rabdoid tumors (AT/TR) still have a bad prognosis, regardless of surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, with regards to pediatric pineal region tumors, there are still areas in prognostic indicators that need to be improved. Similarly, these pathologies need to be treated via a multidisciplinary approach to improve a patient's survival rate and their quality of life.

Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region Rare Pediatric CNS Tumor Case Series Treated in King Fahad Medical City (KFMC).

The clinical behaviors, prognosis, and appropriate treatments of papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are not fully defined due to the rarity of these tumors. At diagnosis, PTPR may present with clinical symptoms, including headache with obstructive hydrocephalus, diplopia, vomiting, and lethargy, as well as neurological signs, including Argyll Robertson pupils and Parinaud's syndrome due to compression of the dorsal midbrain, specifically the periaqueductal region with horizontal nystagmus. Radiological assessment of pineal region lesions is challenging, with a wide range of potential differential diagnoses. PTPR typically presents as a heterogeneous, well-circumscribed mass in the pineal region, which might contain cystic areas, calcifications, hemorrhages, or protein accumulations. Here, we report three female pediatric patients with PTPR treated in King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) in Saudi Arabia. Histological and immunohistochemical diagnosis was confirmed by analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. This case series expands on the available reports on the clinical presentations of PTPR and provides important information on the responses to different treatment modalities.

Pineal region teratoma with metastases in uncommon locations: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We report a rare case in medical literature of a patient with pineal gland teratoma and uncommon metastases. Usually, metastases of this kind of tumor are located in several organs such as lung and breast, but here we found metastases to the spinal cord and vertebrae. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old Asian white man presented with diplopia and acute neural symptoms in the lower limbs such as numbness, tingling, and paralysis. His medical history was notable for pineal teratoma, treated 1 year previously with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Physical examination of the lower limbs showed absent reflexes and sensation with muscle power scale score of 1 in both limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain and spine revealed many lesions in various locations, most compatible with neural, spinal, and vertebral metastases. Unfortunately, the patient died suddenly before any intervention was carried out. CONCLUSION: It is extremely rare for pineal region teratoma to metastasize to the spinal cord and vertebrae, thus more vigilant observation and examination should be provided to patients with pineal teratoma to detect any new lesions and prevent them from becoming dangerous.

Pineal germinoma in a young adult: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial germinomas (GN) are rare cancers that primarily affect children, making them rarer still in adults. Standard treatment for this neoplasm includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) or RT at a higher dose and larger field. These recommendations are based on studies focused mostly on children; it is currently unclear whether this treatment is applicable to adults. CASE: We present a case of a 23-year-old adult male with no underlying pathologies, drug allergies, or family history of cancer, who presented for medical evaluation with blurred vision, diplopia, forgetfulness, and weight loss starting 3-4 months before the evaluation. Clinical examination indicated Parinaud's Syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) revealed a pineal tumor with ependymal dissemination in both lateral ventricles, which was causing obstructive hydrocephalus. The patient had surgery consisting of ventriculostomy, Holter shunt insertion, cisternal ventricular intubation, and cisterna magna anastomosis to improve ventricular drainage. Pathology confirmed pineal germinoma. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology and MRI of the axis were negative. Four cycles of NC were given to the patient (carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide), with reduced dosage. Once a partial volumetric response was confirmed, whole-ventricular radiotherapy (WVR) was initiated with a total tumor bed dose of 45 Gy over 25 sessions in 5 weeks. Optimum clinical results were observed, and no short-term (<90 day) radiation toxicity was observed. The patient was able to resume his normal activities soon after treatment. Follow-ups over 2 years post-surgery indicated continued control of the lesion and absence of symptoms except for mild diplopia. CONCLUSION: Although this is a case report, these data suggest that a reduced NC course and WVR may effectively treat adult GN. This protocol likely decreases the risk of undesirable NC and RT secondary effects, while providing excellent local control; however, using a narrower RT field is not recommended.

Malignant Pineal Parenchymal Tumors in Adults: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Limited retrospective data exist on malignant pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) in adults, and there are no large previous studies that review clinical outcomes across the 3 treatment arms of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. As a result, optimal disease management has yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment trends and perform survival analysis in adult PPT. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically confirmed PPT diagnosed from 2007 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were used to evaluate the prognostic impact of covariates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for comparative subanalyses. RESULTS: Of the 251 patients who met inclusion criteria, 172 had PPTs of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) and 79 had pineoblastoma. A plurality of patients with pineoblastoma were treated with trimodal therapy (39.1%), whereas patients with PPTID were commonly treated with either surgery alone or surgery and radiation (33.7% each). Factors independently associated with improved overall survival include younger patient age, female sex, lower comorbidity score, lower tumor grade, and treatment with surgery or radiation (each P < .05). Subanalyses confirm the effect of radiation on survival in patients with grade III PPTID with subtotal resection; however, no survival benefit of adjuvant radiation is demonstrated in patients with grade II PPTID with subtotal resection. CONCLUSION: Although radiotherapy and surgery were found to increase survival in all patients with PPT, there was no demonstrable survival benefit of adjuvant radiation in surgically treated patients with grade II PPTID. This suggests that adjuvant radiotherapy may not add significant survival benefit in many adult patients with grade II PPTID.

Two cases of pineal anlage tumor with molecular analysis.

Pineal anlage tumor is a rare pediatric tumor with clinical and histological features overlapping with pineoblastoma. Two patients with pineal anlage tumor, a 13-month-old female and an 11-month-old male, underwent subtotal resection, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue, and radiation. Neither had tumor progression 50 months after diagnosis. The tumors underwent next-generation sequencing on a panel of 340 genes. Chromosomal copy gains and losses were present and differed between the tumors. No mutations or amplifications, including none specific to pineoblastoma, were identified.

Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID) and Papillary Tumor of Pineal Region (PTPR): A Review.

BACKGROUND: Pineal parenchymal tumors account for less than 0.3% of all CNS tumors and "Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation" (PPTID; World Health Organization (WHO) grades II and III) exhibit intermediary differentiation and prognosis. However "Papillary tumor of the pineal region" (PTPR; WHO grades II and III) is a distinct entity. OBJECTIVES: This combination of rarity and apparent similarity often leads to perplexity regarding the treatment and prognosis among neurosurgeons. In this review, we have tried to elucidate the differences in clinical as well as treatment modalities and outcomes of these two entities. METHODS: We used the PubMed Database to search for all relevant articles using the keywords "pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation" and "Papillary tumor of the pineal region." Articles having details regarding demographic and clinical variables along with treatment and outcomes were chosen for this study. Full text of these articles was analyzed, and data tabulated. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles for PPTID and 45 for PTPR were found suitable for inclusion in this study. The studies were either case reports or small retrospective series with only one systemic review for each pathology. Despite the poor quality of data, some trends were apparent. Surgical resection offered a survival benefit in both pathologies. Radiotherapy was effective in increasing the survival in PPTID, while there was little to no effect in PPTR. Chemotherapy was not found to be beneficial in either. CONCLUSION: Both of these tumors have moderate growth rate and potential for malignant behavior. This continuum of characteristics makes their optimal treatment strategy difficult and confusing. The discussion on comprehensive literature review should give information for neurosurgeons to decide on optimal treatment strategies.

Prognosticating survival of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) by grade.

BACKGROUND: Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) are a rare group of pineal parenchymal tumors classified by histology as either World Health Organization (WHO) Grades 2 or 3. The rarity of these tumors in adults has left a number of clinical management questions open. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to aggregate a large PPTID cohort with sufficient statistical power from a large national cancer database to analyze prognostic parameters. METHODS: All PPTID patients aged over 18 years in the U.S. National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were summarized and survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 103 adult PPTID patients were identified in the NCDB with 63 (61%) WHO Grade 2 and 40 (39%) WHO Grade 3 tumors. Overall, mean age was 53 ± 18 years with even gender distribution. A total of 75 (73%) patients underwent surgical resection for diagnosis, with gross total resection (GTR) was the most common resection outcome in 50/75 (67%). Chemotherapy was utilized in 18 (17%) patients, and radiation therapy in 37 (36%) patients. Overall, 5-year survival rate was estimated to be 54% (95% CI 42-64%), with mean survival was 84 (95% CI 69-99) months. Patients with Grade 2 tumors survived statistically longer than Grade 3 tumor counterparts (P < 0.01). Overall, older age (HR 1.09, P < 0.01) was associated with shorter survival, whereas GTR (HR 0.43, P = 0.02) was associated with longer survival. Both these parameters were significant within Grade 2 and Grade 3 subgroup analyses as well. CONCLUSIONS: PPTID are rare tumors with expected mean survival more than 5 years, although Grade 2 tumors are expected to survive longer than Grade 3 tumors. Age and gross total resection are significant independent predictors of survival in PPTID overall, as well as within Grade 2 and Grade 3 subgroups separately. The prognostic role and benefit of adjuvant therapy is yet to be elucidated, mandating more molecular and biologic research be done to further optimize clinical management in the future.

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the pineal gland: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Primary intracranial neuroendocrine tumors are exceedingly rare, with few cases in the literature. We present a case of a primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pineal gland, which is the second that has ever been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old male patient presented with vomiting, weakness, and headaches. Imaging revealed a lesion in the pineal region, which was surgically resected. This mass was characterized by histology as a neuroendocrine carcinoma, given the presence of neuroendocrine markers and cytokeratin markers with absence of a primary lesion elsewhere on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: There are currently no guidelines on the management of primary intracranial neuroendocrine tumors. In this case, the patient underwent surgical resection and craniospinal radiotherapy. He subsequently received one cycle of chemotherapy with temozolomide, an alkylating agent, but he unfortunately did not tolerate treatment. A multidisciplinary decision was made along with the patient and his family to focus on palliative care. Eighteen months after the initial presentation, disease recurred in the patient's neck. The patient underwent resection to control the metastases, with a plan to follow with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the patient became unwell and died at 21 months after initial diagnosis. This demonstrates a need for continued research and reporting on this uncommon disease entity.

Clinical characteristics, late effects and outcomes in pineoblastomas in children: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pineoblastomas (PB) are rare tumors of the central nervous system and are more common in children. There is no consensus about standard of care. The objective of this study is to analyze the outcome of children with PB. METHODS: Six patients with PB who were diagnosed between 1990-2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographics, age of diagnosis, first complaint, tumor region, diagnosis type, seeding metastasis to the spinal axis or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), treatment and survival of these patients were recorded. RESULTS: Three patients had subtotal resection and all patients received chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) after diagnosis. Median follow-up after treatment was 5.5 (range:1-19) years. Two patients are alive with no evidence of disease for 7.5 and 10 years, one of whom was diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma 9.5 years after treatment. One of the patients who died had lived for 19 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pineoblastomas are rare but very aggressive tumors; more effective treatment strategies are needed. Survivors should be followed up for late effects such as second malignancies and endocrine deficiencies.

Could Aberrant Migration Explain Metachronous Germ Cell Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Extragonadal germ cell tumors (GCTs) are thought to arise as a result of local transformation of primordial gonadal cells (PGCs) that become misplaced during embryogenesis. With the exception of bilateral testis tumors, metachronous GCT (i.e., occurring at a site classically described for primary GCTs) are rare events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical, radiological, and molecular data (if available) of patients with metachronous GCT were analyzed. RESULTS: Three Caucasian males were identified: case 1 presented with a pineal germinoma 19 years after a mediastinal seminoma that had been treated with chemotherapy, case 2 presented with a pineal non-seminomatous GCT (NSGCT) that occurred three years after a mediastinal seminoma treated with chemotherapy, and case 3 presented with a mediastinal seminoma concomitant with a suprasellar germinoma that occurred two years after a stage I testicular NSGCT treated exclusively with surgery. None of these patients had a positive family history or disorder of sex development. Molecular data were available for cases 2 and 3. In case 2, a CHEK2 gene biallelic inactivation in the second tumor suggested chemoresistance to cisplatin. This was further confirmed by tumor progression during second-line treatment. In case 3, the molecular analysis revealed different profiles in the three tumors, thus suggesting distinct tumor cell origins. CONCLUSION: These rare cases should alert clinicians of the possibility of multiple GCTs that should not be considered to be relapses. The underlying physiopathology is unknown, but multiple PGC mismigrations is a likely cause. Initial treatment with cisplatin may select chemo-resistant clones, thereby making the subsequent treatment more of a challenge.

Pineal Region Glioblastomas: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Given the rarity of patients with pineal glioblastoma (GBM), clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognostic factors are not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate these characteristics and identify the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with pineal GBM, including our 3 cases and an additional 44 cases from published articles, was conducted. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (28 males and 19 females) were enrolled, with a median age of 46 years (range, 5-74 years). Forty-four patients (90.9%) had preoperative obstructive hydrocephalus. Among 38 patients, 21 (55.3%) had distal leptomeningeal dissemination. Forty-five patients (95.7%) had resection/biopsy, 6 of whom had gross total resection, 22 had subtotal resection, 7 had partial resection, and 10 had biopsy. Adjuvant therapy included radiotherapy in 36 patients and chemotherapy in 27 patients. The median OS was 10.0 months. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival was 68.0%, 42.6%, and 17.0%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that patients receiving biopsy (P = 0.042) or chemotherapy (P = 0.029) had the better OS and these were regarded as independent prognostic factors. Further survival analysis showed that chemoradiotherapy had better survival benefit than other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we summarized the characteristics of patients with pineal GBM and showed the correlation between clinical characteristics and prognosis. This study may give readers a deep understanding of these rare GBMs and provide some references for future management.

Pineal region tumors: an entity with crucial anatomical nuances.

PURPOSE: Intra-axial "pineal region" tumors include pineal, tectal, and aqueductal tumors. All three tumor subgroups cause obstruction of the aqueduct; however, they differ in radiological nuances, pathology, differential diagnosis, and treatment. The goal of this manuscript is to describe the radiological, clinical, and pathological nuances that differentiate between these subgroups. METHODS: All patients with intra-axial pineal region tumors were analyzed retrospectively, including demographics, radiological characteristics, pathology, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (1-69 years of age) were included: 19 pineal, 10 tectal, 10 aqueductal, 4 periaqueductal, and 6 complex. The 3 main subgroups differed in various radiological and anatomical nuances. Age and gender did not differ between groups. Other factors that did not differ between groups included T1 and T2 signals, presence of blood products, a normally located (non-displaced) tectum, anterior tectal displacement, thalamic involvement, and presence of hydrocephalus. The pathological spectrum differed between the 3 main subgroups, as well as the surgical treatment, and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite sharing a close anatomical location, as well as all causing obstruction of the aqueduct with secondary hydrocephalus, the differential diagnosis, diagnostic methods, and possible treatment and surgical options differ between the various subgroups. Anatomical nuances are described to better delineate the various tumor subgroups and recommend specific treatment approaches.