Biologics for Treatment of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the published efficacy and adverse event rates associated with existing biologics for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP). DATA SOURCES: A literature review using the PubMed database (January 1990-July 2023) was conducted. Multiple search combinations were conducted using "pityriasis rubra pilaris" and various biologics as keywords to identify relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Inclusion criteria included all study types that were published within the past 30 years in English and mentioned at least one biologic and PRP. A preliminary search yielded a total of 499 results. After screening using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 relevant articles (69 case reports, 5 case series, 2 clinical trials, and 1 retrospective analysis) were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: TNF-α inhibitors have been evaluated and are effective in treating PRP. However, recent treatment with anti-interleukin (IL)-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies such as ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are emerging as new treatment options with a mean improvement in PRP Area and Severity Index scores, change in severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness of PRP lesions. From initial clinical trials, secukinumab and ixekizumab are promising treatment options for achieving remission. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review compares the efficacy for numerous biologics and a discussion to guide clinicians on benefits and risks in choosing a biologic for PRP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics may be a favourable treatment option leading to greater patient adherence due to reduced dosing frequencies, improvement in quality of life, and reduction in frequency and severity of flares.

Updates on Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Scoping Review.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare, inflammatory papulosquamous skin disease with unknown exact etiology. Historically, PRP has been challenging to diagnose, especially during the acute phase, and to treat, due to its unclear pathogenesis. To better inform clinical practice, a literature review was conducted employing a broad search strategy to capture PRP-related published studies between January 1, 2012 to October 31, 2022. Two hundred twenty-one studies were identified, which were categorized into 9 themes: (1) potential causes and triggering factors, (2) comorbidities, (3) diagnostic difficulties, (4) genetics, (5) clinical manifestations and laboratory values, (6) treatment, (7) treatment-related adverse events, (8) quality of life, and (9) other. COVID-19 infection, COVID-19 vaccination, and malignancy were the most commonly reported potential triggering factors. Misdiagnosis is very common during the early acute stages. Pathogenesis and genetic studies have further implicated caspase recruitment domain family member 14 (CARD14) mutations in the development of familial PRP (Type V) and have underlined the overlap between psoriasis and PRP. To date, there are currently no specific and validated scoring systems or tools to assess the severity of PRP. While large, randomized trials are still lacking, biologic agents remain the most effective therapy.

Biologics for inherited disorders of keratinisation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Recent literature highlights the potential of biologics in the management of inherited disorders of keratinisation. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of existing literature on treatment outcomes of inherited keratinisation disorders treated with biologics. METHODS: Eligible records were retrieved through searches of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Databases were searched from inception to July 2023 for eligible records. A snowballing method was employed to search the references of the retrieved records for the identification of potentially relevant articles. RESULTS: One hundred and four eligible studies consisting of a total of 166 patients with an inherited disorder of keratinisation were included. Patients had a median age of 19 years (range: 0.5 to 70 years). The most common disorders were Netherton syndrome (n = 63; 38%), autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses (n = 27; 16%), CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruptions (n = 17; 10%) and familial pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) (n = 15; 9%).Of the 207 times biologics were employed, the three most frequently employed biologics were secukinumab (n = 47; 23%), dupilumab (n = 44; 21%) and ustekinumab (n = 37; 18%). Complete remission was observed in 10 (5%) instances, partial remission in 129 (62%), no or limited response to biologic therapy in 68 (32%) cases, and results are still pending in one case. A total of 33 adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst biologics may be considered in cases of inherited keratinisation disorders recalcitrant to standard therapy, definitive conclusions are prohibited by the low-level of evidence and substantial heterogeneity in methodology across the included studies. Establishment of consensus definitions, and randomised clinical trials may help ascertain the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in this context and establish the best agent and dosing protocol for each disorder.

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris After Moderna COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report and Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: To date, over 60% of the world's population has received at least 1 dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, with over 12 billion doses administered globally. Commonly reported adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination include fever, headache, myalgia, and injection site reactions. The spectrum of documented cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination is broad; however, pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) or PRP-like eruption secondary to COVID-19 vaccine is exceedingly rare, with only 17 cases previously reported to date in the English literature. In this article, we describe an additional case of COVID-19 vaccination-associated PRP in a 50-year-old woman with a history of metastatic breast carcinoma, who developed a widespread cutaneous eruption characteristic of PRP, including palmoplantar keratoderma, 10 days after her third dose of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Punch biopsy specimen showed epidermal hyperplasia with overlying hyperkeratosis, alternating orthokeratosis and parakeratosis and focal follicular plugging, supporting the diagnosis of PRP. The patient improved within weeks of initiating oral acitretin and topical steroids, with resolution achieved after 3 months of continued therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third reported case of Moderna COVID-19 vaccination-associated PRP and collectively the 18 th after the administration of all COVID-19 vaccines currently available, including Pfizer-BioNTech, and AstraZeneca.

Treatment Options for Juvenile Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris represents a group of familial and acquired disorders of cornification that affect both adult and pediatric patients. Treatment options are difficult to assess through clinical trials, given the rarity of the disorder and its tendency for spontaneous remission. Case reports and case series are therefore the primary means of assessment. Because of the heterogeneity of the disease, there is no universal approach to treatment, and multiple agents may need to be trialed to achieve disease control. At present, topicals are used for most pediatric patients, though monotherapy with topicals is only effective for less severe disease. Despite concerns over their side-effect profiles, oral retinoids are generally accepted as a first-line systemic therapy. However, interleukin-17 inhibitors and ustekinumab, an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 inhibitor, may soon become first-line systemic treatment as well, given their efficacy and relative safety in trials thus far. Ustekinumab, in particular, is emerging as a first-line agent for patients with pityriasis rubra pilaris with CARD14 gene variations. When these therapies fail, second-line and adjunctive therapies to consider include tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate, and phototherapy. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of many of these agents in juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Ponatinib-Associated Cutaneous Eruptions-A Case Series and Review of Clinicopathologic Findings.

ABSTRACT: Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cutaneous toxicities are a commonly reported side effect of ponatinib treatment with "rash" being one of the most common. Specific subtypes are infrequently reported, but include hyperkeratotic, folliculocentric, ichthyosiform, and pityriasis rubra pilaris-like eruptions. Herein, we highlight the clinicopathologic features of 2 cases of ponatinib-induced pityriasis rubra pilaris-like eruptions. We also classify the clinical and histopathologic features of all previously reported ponatinib-associated eruptions in the literature and discuss treatment and potential diagnostic pitfalls.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris heralding diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma: a case report.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris is a papulosquamous inflammatory dermatosis that can be associated with HIV, autoimmunity, infections, certain medications, and neoplasms. Paraneoplastic pityriasis rubra pilaris has previously been reported in association with solid organ malignancies and once with leukemia. Herein, we present an elderly man with paraneoplastic pityriasis rubra pilaris, heralding the diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Our patient's pityriasis rubra pilaris resolved after surgical resection of the tumor.

Early Presentation of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris Mimicking Tinea Corporis: Diagnostic Challenges of a Rare Skin Condition.

BACKGROUND Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by follicular, papulosquamous, reddish-orange scaling, palmoplantar keratoderma, and erythema with islands of sparing. Its heterogeneous clinical presentation makes the diagnosis of PRP quite challenging, especially at the initial presentation, as it can mimic common skin conditions. CASE REPORT We present a case with an early presentation of PRP in a 61-year-old Malay woman with underlying uncontrolled diabetes, and discuss evolving clinical course of her disease. She presented to a primary care clinic with a 3-week history of itchy, ring-like skin lesions that started on her neck and chest but subsequently spread widely on her chest, back, and upper extremities. She was first treated as having extensive tinea corporis but responded poorly to multiple courses of antifungal treatment. An initial skin biopsy that was taken at the dermatology clinic revealed features suggestive of erythema annulare centrifugum. However, despite topical steroid treatment, her skin condition evolved further and she developed generalized erythroderma along with follicular hyperkeratosis and palmoplantar keratoderma. A repeat biopsy finally confirmed the diagnosis of PRP. CONCLUSIONS Making the diagnosis of PRP is challenging for clinicians. However, clinicians should approach any common skin problem that does not respond to treatment appropriately, with consideration of other uncommon skin disorders. A repeat skin biopsy may be considered if there are any doubts about the diagnosis. A clinical and histopathological correlation is important to aid in the diagnosis of PRP.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris with erythema gyratum repens-like eruption and resolution with ustekinumab.

Erythema gyratum repens (EGR) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder often preceding the diagnosis of underlying malignancy by 9 months on average, while pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is an uncommon papulosquamous inflammatory disease. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman with an EGR-like eruption transforming from resolving PRP, without associated malignancy. Her rash dramatically resolved within a month of ustekinumab initiation, which supports this presentation as a unique entity.

Successful treatment of severe pityriasis rubra pilaris with secukinumab in a 3-year-old boy.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare, scaly, keratotic inflammatory skin disease characterized by red scaly patches, keratosis papules, palmoplantar keratoderma and scaling of the scalp. In severe cases, ectropion of the eyelid may occur, and erythroderma may further develop. Recently, it has been reported that secukinumab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin-17A antibody, has certain efficacy in the treatment of PRP. Herein, we report a 3-year-old Chinese boy with severe Type III (classic juvenile) PRP who was successfully treated with secukinumab alone.

Paraneoplastic Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris Preceding Leukemia.

ABSTRACT: Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare, chronic papulosquamous disorder that presents with scaling plaques, palmoplantar keratoderma, and keratotic follicular papules. Typically, there are distinctive unaffected areas referred to as "islands of sparing." Pityriasis rubra pilaris has been associated with various immunodeficient states and malignancies.The authors conducted a literature review using MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar, documenting all known cases of PRP associated with malignancy; 15 cases were found in the literature. They also present the case of a 49-year-old White man who, prior to referral to dermatology, was seen in urgent care for widespread pruritic rash. Physical examination in the dermatology clinic revealed confluent, scaly erythematous papules coalescing into plaques with island of sparing involving the trunk and upper and lower extremities. Bilateral palms and soles showed hyperkeratosis with fissuring. He was diagnosed with PRP after punch biopsy and began a new course of topical corticosteroid therapy. Hematology was consulted because of abnormal complete blood count results, and he was subsequently diagnosed with chronic lymphoid leukemia.Treatment of PRP is largely based on clinical experience and may involve corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or biologic therapy. The relationship between PRP and malignancy is unknown. Current theories postulate it may be driven by tumor production of functional peptides or antigen cross-reactivity between cancer cells and the skin. This is the second reported case of PRP as a manifestation of leukemia, and the first of chronic lymphoid leukemia. Although not yet understood, the documented relationship between PRP and malignancy prompts screening for cancer in all patients with new-onset PRP.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris post-infection due COVID-19: case report / Pitiriasis rubra pilaris post-infección por COVID-19: reporte de un caso

Abstract Case description: 32-month-old boy, IgG positive for SARS-CoV-2, presented to the emergency department with dermatologic lesions. Clinical findings: Four days before admission, he presented skin eruptions with redness and pruritus on hands and feet. Generalized papular erythema was evidenced, upper extremities with diffuse erythematosquamous plaques, palmoplantar keratoderma, so he was evaluated by a dermatologist who diagnosed pityriasis rubra pilaris. Treatment and outcome: rehydrating cream, cetirizine 0.5 mg/kg/day every two days, and prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day in the morning. He was discharged after 14 days, the patient presented clinical improvement, but the erythematous lesion persisted on the trunk and extremities. In the evaluation, after three months, the patient did not show the described lesions, evidencing an improvement and clinical resolution of the dermatological problems. Clinical relevance: We report a patient with pityriasis rubra piloris associated with a post-infection by SARS-CoV-2 that had not been described before.

Resumen Descripción del caso: Niño 32 meses de vida, con IgG positivo para SARS-CoV-2, acude al servicio de emergencia por presentar lesiones dermatológicas. Hallazgos clínicos: Cuatro días antes del ingreso presentó erupciones en la piel, con enrojecimiento y prurito en manos y pies. Se evidenció eritema papular generalizado, extremidades superiores con placas eritematoescamosas difusas, queratodermia palmo-plantar por lo que es evaluado por dermatólogo quien diagnostica pitiriasis rubra pilaris. Tratamiento y resultado: Crema rehidratantes, cetirizina 0.5 mg/kg/día cada 2 días y prednisolona 2 mg/kg/día por la mañana. Fue dado de alta a los 14 días, el paciente presenta mejora clínica, pero aún persiste la lesión eritematosa en tronco y extremidades. En la evaluación a los tres meses el paciente no mostró las lesiones descritas, evidenciando una mejoría y resolución clínica de los problemas dermatológicos. Relevancia clínica: Se reporta un paciente con afectación por pitiriasis rubra piloris asociado a una post-infección por SARS-CoV-2 que no se había descrito antes.

Treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris: a case series of 28 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare chronic inflammatory dermatosis. Treatment is challenging and mostly based on scarce empirical evidence from large case series. OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient characteristics and therapy outcomes in patients with PRP. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with PRP treated at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, between 01/2005 and 10/2018, were analysed according to patient and disease characteristics and treatment experience. RESULTS: PRP was diagnosed in 28 patients with a mean age of 57.3 years at onset; 20 were men (71.4%) and eight women (28.6%). Of all the patients, 89.3% had comorbid diseases; metabolic disorders were particularly frequent. Seventy-eight treatment courses were identified with acitretin as the most common therapy (28.2%). Excellent response was noted in 71.4% of treatment courses with methotrexate, followed by cyclosporine (27.3%) and acitretin (19.0%). Among biologics, ustekinumab (excellent response: 75.0%) and infliximab (50.0%) were particularly effective. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the few comprehensive larger case series of patients with PRP. Acitretin may be effective, particularly for type I PRP, and other retinoids, methotrexate or cyclosporine might also be considered early in the therapeutic algorithm. Moreover, our data adds to the growing evidence that biologics are effective and safe for the treatment of PRP.

Secukinumab monotherapy successfully treated severe refractory type V (atypical juvenile) pityriasis rubra pilaris: A case report and literature review.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare heterogeneous group of papulosquamous inflammatory disorders with unknown etiology. PRP is often resistant to many conventional therapies which has made more challenging on treatment. More recently, several studies have shown encouraging clinical results of secukinumab in the treatment of PRP in adult, but no studies have explored its effects in children. We herein report a 7-year-old boy with severe type V PRP responded rapidly to secukinumab monotherapy (150 mg once weekly) when conventional therapies have failed. The patient showed rapid and dramatic improvement of erythema, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, scaling, and itching within only 5 weeks, with no adverse effects. Secukinumab could be considered as a treatment option for refractory PRP in children, as recently reported in adult.

Acantholytic pityriasis rubra pilaris associated with topical use of imiquimod 5%: case report and literature review

Abstract Topical use of immune response modifiers, such as imiquimod, has increased in dermatology. Although its topical use is well tolerated, it may be associated with exacerbations of generalized cutaneous inflammatory diseases, possibly through the systemic circulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This report describes a case of development of pityriasis rubra pilaris, a rare erythematous-papulosquamous dermatosis, in a woman aged 60 years during treatment with imiquimod 5% cream for actinic keratosis. It evolved with erythrodermic conditions and palmoplantar keratoderma, presenting progressive clinical resolution after the introduction of methotrexate. The authors emphasize the importance of recognizing possible systemic reactions associated with the topical use of imiquimod.

Acantholytic pityriasis rubra pilaris associated with topical use of imiquimod 5%: case report and literature review.

Topical use of immune response modifiers, such as imiquimod, has increased in dermatology. Although its topical use is well tolerated, it may be associated with exacerbations of generalized cutaneous inflammatory diseases, possibly through the systemic circulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This report describes a case of development of pityriasis rubra pilaris, a rare erythematous-papulosquamous dermatosis, in a woman aged 60 years during treatment with imiquimod 5% cream for actinic keratosis. It evolved with erythrodermic conditions and palmoplantar keratoderma, presenting progressive clinical resolution after the introduction of methotrexate. The authors emphasize the importance of recognizing possible systemic reactions associated with the topical use of imiquimod.

Use of Biologics in Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris Refractory to First-Line Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review [Formula: see text].

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is an uncommon, inflammatory, papulosquamous skin disease. Treatment of PRP is challenging as the disease is often refractory to conventional therapies, such as retinoids and methotrexate. There has been an increasing number of studies reporting the successful use of biologic therapy in patients with PRP; however, the data on the efficacy and safety are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the existing evidence for utilizing biologics, whether alone or in combination with established systemic therapies, in patients with treatment-resistant PRP. We systematically reviewed evidence within Medline and Pubmed databases between January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2019. Articles consisted of patients diagnosed with PRP who have failed to respond sufficiently to first-line systemic therapies, or who had comorbidities that precluded their use. In total, 363 unique articles were identified, 56 of which were considered relevant to the clinical question. Of the 56 articles highlighted, 35 met the inclusion criteria and were limited to case series and case studies. Therapy with biologics was found to be successful for both monotherapy (81.1% [27/33]) and when used in combination with existing systemic therapies (87.5% [14/16]). The existing evidence suggests that biologics may be regarded as a tool for PRP treatment alone or in combination therapy with existing treatments, although large-scale randomized clinical trials are necessary to better assess their efficacy and safety.