The effect of donation frequency on donor health in blood donors donating plasma by plasmapheresis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The demand for plasma products is growing, necessitating an increase in plasma collection by plasmapheresis. While the 20th edition of the European Guidelines permits plasma donors in Europe to donate with 96-h donation intervals, the potential short- and long-term consequences of high-frequency plasma donations on donor health remain unknown. This study aims to measure the effect of plasma donation frequency on plasma protein composition, including total serum protein (TSP) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), in Norwegian male blood donors. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 120 male blood donors who were randomized into two intervention groups and one control group: high-frequency plasma donors (HFPDs) who donated 650 mL of plasma 3 times every 2 weeks, whereas regular-frequency plasma donors (RFPDs) who donated 650 mL of plasma 1 time every 2 weeks. The control group consisted of whole blood donors. The primary outcomes are the concentrations of TSP and IgG. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study may have implications for recommendations related to donor health and plasma donation frequencies and may contribute to supporting the strategic independence of plasma products in Norway and Europe without compromising donor health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05179200 . Registered December 20th, 2021.

Assessing the comparative efficacy of plasmapheresis and Intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness, posing significant challenges to patients' daily lives. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasmapheresis are two prominent immunomodulatory therapies used in MG management, but the choice between them remains a clinical dilemma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IVIG versus plasmapheresis in MG management. METHODS: We adhered to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered the review protocol in PROSPERO. Systematic search across electronic databases identified 14 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from these studies were extracted, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy, while secondary outcomes encompassed hospitalization, ventilation, antibody titers, and treatment-related complications. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software. RESULTS: The pooled results indicated that patients receiving plasmapheresis had higher odds of any improvement in MG symptoms compared to IVIG. However, change in severity scores did not significantly differ between the two treatments. Hospitalization durations were similar, but IVIG-treated patients tended to have shorter stays. Antibody titers, particularly anti-MUSK antibodies, favored plasmapheresis treatment. Complication rates were comparable between two groups. However, severe complications were more common in plasmapheresis. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive analysis suggests that plasmapheresis may offer superior short-term symptom improvement in MG compared to IVIG, while IVIG may lead to shorter hospital stays and lower complication rates. The choice between these treatments should be tailored to individual patient needs and disease characteristics. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and mortality rates in MG management.

Divide et Vinces, Therapeutic Apheresis in Nephrological Clinical Practice.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or plasmapheresis has been used in various life-threatening diseases as a primary treatment or in combination with other therapies. It was first successfully employed in the 1960s for diseases like Waldenström's disease and myeloma. Since then, TPE techniques using apheresis membranes have been introduced. Apheresis therapies separate plasma components from blood using membrane screening or centrifugation methods. TPE aims to remove substances involved in the pathophysiology of diseases. It selectively removes high-molecular-weight molecules, substances with prolonged half-life, and those associated with disease pathogenesis. TPE can be performed using membranes or centrifugation, with replacement of extracted plasma volume using albumin or fresh frozen plasma. TPE requires specific competencies in nephrology and can be prescribed and monitored by nephrologists and performed by dialysis nursing staff. TPE can be combined with adsorption-based therapies to enhance its effect, and this approach is called plasma filtration adsorption. Another variation is double plasma filtration, which selectively removes substances based on molecular size. TPE can also be combined with lipoprotein removal strategies for managing familial hypercholesterolemia. TPE is an affordable extracorporeal therapy that benefits patients with life-threatening diseases. It requires collaboration between nephrologists and other specialists, and our results demonstrate successful TPE without anticoagulation in general hospitalization or outpatient settings.

Real-world application of plasmapheresis for neurological disease: Results from the Japan-Plasmapheresis Outcome and Practice Patterns Study.

INTRODUCTION: Plasmapheresis is a well-recognized treatment for autoimmune neurological diseases in Japan. However, the practice varies depending on the facility, and the actual treatment conditions are unclear. METHODS: To clarify real-world conditions, a prospective observational study was conducted on patients with neurological diseases who were scheduled to receive plasmapheresis. A dataset was analyzed that included 887 treatments from 210 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and other diseases for 82, 30, 24, and 74 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The types of plasmapheresis performed included immunoadsorption plasmapheresis, plasma exchange, and double filtration plasmapheresis with 620, 213, and 54 treatments, respectively. Approximately, 60% of the treatments were performed using peripheral blood access alone. Non-serious adverse events were observed in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improvement was observed after plasmapheresis in patients with MG, MS, and NMOSD. These were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale.

Plasmapheresis compared with conventional treatment for hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) induced by hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) remains controversial with regard to plasmapheresis vs conventional treatment. We reviewed relevant articles to explore the efficacy of plasmapheresis in the management of HTG-induced AP. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that compared plasmapheresis with conventional treatment for HTG-induced AP using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, as well as relevant references. The primary outcomes were 24 h triglyceride reduction rate and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 791 articles were retrieved. Finally, 15 observational studies (1080 participants) were included, most of which were historical cohort studies. Compared with conventional treatment, plasmapheresis assisted in the reduction of serum triglyceride (TG) levels in the first 24 h after hospital admission (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17 to 0.99; P = 0.005). However, it resulted in increased hospitalization costs (thousand yuan) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 24.32; 95% CI: 12.96 to 35.68; P < 0.001). With regard to in-hospital mortality, although the mortality rate in the plasmapheresis group was higher than that in the conventional treatment group (relative risk [RR]: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.94; P = 0.038), the result was disturbed by confounding factors as per the subgroup and sensitivity analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis (TSA). No significant differences were found in other outcomes, including systematic complications, local complications, the requirement for surgery, and hospitalization duration. CONCLUSION: The effect of plasmapheresis in HTG-induced AP is not superior to that of conventional treatment, even resulting in a greater economic burden to patients and health care system. High quality randomized control trials are required to obtain a more a definitive understanding of this issue.

Monitoring and recovery of hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial dysfunction with rheopheresis in diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity.

AIMS: Rheopheresis is an extracorporeal haematotherapy that improves haemorheological status by filtering proteins that enhance blood viscosity. It also has anti-inflammatory effects by removing inflammatory cytokines. Our study aims to examine the effects of rheopheresis on the endothelial status in diabetic lower extremity ulceration. METHODS: In vitro experiments were performed in a HUVEC model to mimic hyperglycaemic stress. We determined the changes in gene expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha, endothelin convertase enzyme, ET-1, and NO synthase, as well as the ROS and intracellular GSH levels upon hyperglycaemia. In in vivo studies, two rheopheresis procedures were performed on seven patients with diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity, and we measured the changes in plasma concentrations of ET-1, TXB2, SOD enzyme activity, and extracellular components of the glutathione pool depending on treatments. RESULTS: Our results showed that hyperglycaemia increases endothelial expression of inflammatory cytokines, ET-1, and endothelin convertase enzyme, while NO synthase was decreased. As a result of rheopheresis, we observed decreased ET-1 and TXB2 concentrations in the plasma and beneficial changes in the parameters of the glutathione pool. CONCLUSION: To summarize our results, hyperglycaemia-induced oxidative stress and endothelial inflammation can be moderated by rheopheresis in diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity.

Double filtration plasmapheresis for hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis caused by fat overload syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) can cause acute pancreatitis (AP). CASE SUMMARY: We report a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received long-term intravenous parenteral nutrition solution without monitoring of the serum triglyceride (TG) level, which resulted in fat overload syndrome and HTG-AP. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Double filtration plasmapheresis was performed to eliminate the TGs and treat the AP.

Protocol of comparison of the effects of single plasma exchange and double filtration plasmapheresis on peripheral lymphocyte phenotypes in patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: a monocentric prospective study with single-case experimental design.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), a rare disorder affecting young adults, causes gradual weakness of the limbs, areflexia and impaired sensory function. New CIDP phenotypes without pathogenic antibodies but with modified cell profiles have been described. Treatments include corticotherapy, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis but the latter's action mechanisms remain unclear. Plasmapheresis supposedly removes toxic agents like antibodies from plasma but it is uncertain whether it has an immune-modulating effect. Also, the refining mechanisms of the two main plasmapheresis techniques-single plasma exchange and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) - are different and unclear. This study aims to compare the evolution of peripheral lymphocyte profiles in patients with CIDP according to their treatment (single centrifugation plasmapheresis or DFPP) to better grasp the action mechanisms of both techniques. METHOD: In this proof-of-concept, monocentric, prospective, Single-Case Experimental Design study, 5 patients are evaluated by alternating their treatment type (single plasma exchange or DFPP) for 6 courses of treatment after randomization to their first treatment type. Each course of treatment lasts 2-4 weeks. For single plasma exchange, 60 ml/kg plasma will be removed from the patient and replaced with albumin solutes, with a centrifugation method to avoid the immunological reaction caused by the membrane used with the filtration method. For DFPP, 60 ml/kg plasma will be removed from the patient with a plasma separator membrane, then processed via a fractionator membrane to remove molecules of a greater size than albumin before returning it to the patient. This technique requires no substitution solutes, only 20 g of albumin to replace what would normally be lost during a session. The primary outcome is the difference between the two plasmapheresis techniques in the variation of the TH1/TH17 ratio over the period D0H0-D0H3 and D0H0-D7. Secondary outcomes include the variation in lymphocyte subpopulations at each session and between therapeutic plasmapheresis techniques, the clinical evolution, tolerance and cost of treatments. DISCUSSION: Understanding the action mechanisms of single plasma exchange and DFPP will help us to offer the right treatment to each patient with CIPD according to efficacy, tolerance and cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov under the no. NCT04742374 and date of registration 10 December 2020.

Outcome of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using a modified desensitization protocol without plasmapheresis.

OBJECTIVES: Several controversies regarding desensitization strategies for successful ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation still exist. This study aimed to investigate whether pretransplant anti-A/B antibody removal is mandatory in an ABOi kidney transplant recipient with low baseline isoagglutinin titers. METHODS: We adopted a modified desensitization protocol with two doses of rituximab (RTX, 100 mg/body) without pretransplant antibody removal for ABOi kidney transplant recipients with a titer of ≤1:64 (group A; n = 35) and investigated the feasibility of this protocol by comparing it with the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing standard pretransplant plasmapheresis (group B; n = 21). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of antibody-mediated rejection within the first month after transplantation between the two groups (11.4% in group A vs. 2% in group B, p = 0.6019). Moreover, no differences were observed in the short- and long-term graft outcomes between the groups. However, two major critical acute antibody-mediated events occurred in group A; one patient lost the graft due to hyperacute rejection, and the other patient developed thrombotic microangiopathy after surgery. Risk factors predicting these perioperative complications were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that not only B-cell depletion using RTX but also pretransplant antibody removal is still recommended even for patients with low isoagglutinin titers. In addition, a new diagnostic tool is needed for accurate risk stratification.

Efficacy of intravenous combined immunosuppression with plasmapheresis in adult patients with refractory primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) treatment is based on immunosuppressive therapies. Since refractory disease is common, alternative methods are emerging. One of these methods is plasmapheresis with intravenous cyclosporine and corticosteroids, and it could be an option in post-transplant recurrent FSGS. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of this combined treatment in adult patients with refractory primary FSGS. METHODS: Seven refractory primary FSGS patients were included. Demographics, estimated glomerular filtration rates, serum albumin levels, urine protein/creatinine ratios, and previous treatments were evaluated. Also, complications and remission rates were assessed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 23 years. Median duration of diagnosis was 2 years. Median number of plasmapheresis sessions was 14. Five of seven patients (71.4%, one complete, four partial remissions) were responders after the protocol. Changes in serum albumin levels and proteinuria after protocol were statistically significant (P = 0.018 and P = 0.018, respectively). eGFR levels did not change statistically (P = 0.753). Median follow-up duration after the treatment was 17 months. However, two patients experienced disease relapse (28.5%). End-stage kidney disease was developed in two patients. Sustained remission rate was 42.8% during follow-up (One complete and two partial remissions). Also, 42.8% of patients experienced catheter infections. Catheter-associated thrombosis that required surgery was observed in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmapheresis combined with intravenous cyclosporine and corticosteroids could be an option in refractory primary FSGS. High response rates after this protocol were encouraging. However, the relapsing disease was observed after the cessation of apheresis. Also, complications of the protocol could limit the applicability.

Acute Anti-A/B Antibody-Mediated Rejection After ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Treated With Bortezomib and Plasmapheresis: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (KTP) is effective for avoiding transplantation-related issues. It is a viable alternative to ABO-compatible KTP, as both techniques have similar patient and graft survival rates. However, anti-A/B antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can occur, resulting in poor long-term graft survival. CASE: A 45-year-old man with end-stage renal disease presented with a serum creatinine level of 10.2 mg/dL. We decided to perform KTP with spousal donation. He had panel-reactive antibody class I and II and cross matching test negativity, a 3/6 mismatch on human leukocyte antigen typing, an ABO antibody titer of 1:256, and no donor-specific antibodies. The patient and donor blood types were O+ and A+, respectively. The anti-A/B antibody titer was reduced preoperatively with rituximab (200 mg/body), plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (0.2 mg/kg). Basiliximab and methylprednisolone were used for induction immunosuppression, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone were used for maintenance immunosuppression. KTP was successful, and graft function was initially normal. On postoperative day (POD) 5, the serum creatinine level and anti-A/B antibody titer increased from 0.9 mg/dL to 1.9 mg/dL and 1:16 to 1:64, respectively. Graft biopsy revealed acute AMR and tubular injury. We started steroid pulse therapy, plasmapheresis, and subcutaneous bortezomib (2.6 mg, twice a day, every 3 days) with no side effects. The serum creatinine level decreased from 5.7 mg/dL to 1.5 mg/dL on POD 28. Graft biopsy showed no rejection, and normal function was maintained for 40 months. CONCLUSIONS: Acute, early anti-A/B AMR was successfully treated with plasmapheresis and bortezomib.

Peptide GAM immunoadsorption in anti-PLA2 R positive autoimmune membranous nephropathy. The PRISM trial.

Membranous nephropathy associated with anti-PLA2 R autoantibody is a significant cause of nephrotic syndrome worldwide. Treatment remains empiric with a significant side-effect burden despite an increase in our understanding of the disease. We studied the effect of selectively removing this pathogenic autoantibody using immunoadsorption in adult patients with biopsy proven anti-PLA2 R membranous nephropathy. This was a multicenter, single-arm prospective clinical trial carried out in the United Kingdom. Twelve patients underwent five consecutive sessions of peptide GAM immunoadsorption with 12 months follow-up. Primary outcome was anti-PLA2 R titer at week 2. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability of therapy, antibody profile, and change in proteinuria, renal excretory function, serum albumin, total immunoglobulin, and quality of life at weeks 12, 24, and 52. Patients were also stratified by the presence or absence of the high-risk allele (heterozygous or homozygous for HLA-DQA1*05). Median pretreatment anti-PLA2 R was 702.50 U/mL, 1045.00 U/mL at week 2 (P-value .023) and 165.00 U/mL at week 52 (P-value .017). The treatment was well tolerated and safe. Two patients required rescue immunosuppression during the follow-up period. There was a significant improvement in serum albumin with a median at baseline of 20.50 g/L rising to 25.00 g/L at week 52 (P-value <.001). There was no statistical difference over the follow-up period in proteinuria or renal function. Patients in possession of a high-risk allele saw improvement in anti-PLA2 R titers, possibly representing a cohort more likely to benefit from immunoadsorption. Immunoadsorption therapy is a safe treatment and well-tolerated treatment in anti-PLA2 R positive autoimmune membranous nephropathy.

Improvement of clinical outcome, laboratory findings and inflammatory cytokines levels using plasmapheresis therapy in severe COVID-19 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Cytokine storm is one of the consequences of the severe forms of COVID-19 due to excessive immune response. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of plasmapheresis and its role on the inflammatory cytokines levels in patients suffering from severe COVID-19. METHODS: In plasmapheresis group, 22 severe cases of COVID-19 receiving three cycles of plasmapheresis with time interval of 24-36 h and 22 COVID-19 patients as the control group were enrolled. Clinical history and laboratory parameters as well as IL-1, IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-17 cytokines serum levels in the time points of before and after plasmapheresis were studied. RESULTS: In severe COVID-19 patients, plasmapheresis significantly improved clinical and laboratory parameters such as cough, weakness, fever, blood oxygen saturation and CRP levels. Serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-17 in the group of patients receiving plasmapheresis, had a significant decrease following plasmapheresis courses. Although only IL-6 level in the control group had a significant decrease between the days 1-14 of disease. Also, at both time points of before and after plasmapheresis, serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-17 were inversely correlated to blood oxygen saturation. CONCLUSION: Based on the obtained results, plasmapheresis therapy in severe forms of COVID-19 can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of the disease and reduce inflammatory markers. Therefore, it is suggested that plasmapheresis can be evaluated in standard treatment protocols for severe forms of COVID-19.

Treatment Options for COVID-19-Related Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system complications are reported in an increasing number of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19-related Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is of particular importance given its association with higher mortality rates and prolonged respiratory failure. REVIEW SUMMARY: We conducted a systematic review of published cases for COVID-19-related GBS, and provide a summary of clinical management strategies for these cases. Sixty-three studies, including 86 patients, were included. Seventy-six cases with reported outcome data were eligible for the outcome analysis. Ninety-nine percent of patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 before diagnosis of GBS (median: 14 d prior, interquartile range: 7 to 20). Intravenous immunotherapy (intravenous immunoglobulin: 0.4 g/kg/d for 5 d) was the most frequently used treatment approach. The review indicated that the outcome was not favorable in 26% of cases (persistent neurological deficits). A mortality rate of 3.5% was observed in patients with COVID-19-related GBS. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence to support specific treatments is lacking, clinicians should consider the benefits of immunotherapy and plasma exchange in addition to the standard antimicrobial and supportive therapies for patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for acute sensory and motor polyradiculoneuritis. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment alone is not shown to result in improved outcomes or mortality. More extensive studies aimed at exploring the neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19 and distinctive treatment options for COVID-19-related GBS are warranted.

Successful treatment with immunoadsorption therapy in four patients with severe and refractory anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.

There is still no optimal treatment for patients with severe anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis refractory to first-line therapy (including intravenous methylprednisolone [IVMP] and intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIG]). A small study has shown that immunoadsorption (IA) is effective in treating anti-NMDAR encephalitis. However, the effectiveness and safety of IA in the treatment of patients with refractory and severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis is not fully known. Four patients with severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis are reported, which were refractory to the first-line immunotherapy including IVMP and IVIG. Immunoadsorption is performed during the fulminant stage of disease, and the effectiveness and safety of IA are assessed. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is used to assess neurological conditions before and after IA. Four patients with the most severe form of anti-NMDAR encephalitis (two with teratoma and two with unknown origin) did not respond to one or more rounds of IVMP plus IVIG. They all required intensive care unit (ICU) support including long-term mechanical ventilation, and thus developed ICU-related complications. Gradual and steady improvement was observed after IA treatment. Except for mild hypotension in patient 1, no other adverse events were observed during IA. Two patients had good early overall recovery on discharge. The other two patients had a good outcome with mRS of 2 at the 12-month follow-up. This small case series suggests that IA may be an effective treatment option to accelerate the recovery of patients with severe and refractory anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Dynamic Changes in AQP4-IgG Level and Immunological Markers During Protein-A Immunoadsorption Therapy for NMOSD: A Case Report and Literature Review.

The changes in the serum levels of aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG), immunoglobulins, and inflammatory mediators in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) cases treated with immunoadsorption have been rarely described in detail. Here we report a 29-year-old steroid-resistant NMOSD female with a severe disability (bilateral blindness and paraplegia) who received protein-A immunoadsorption as a rescue treatment. During the total 5 sessions, the circulating level of AQP4-IgG, immunoglobulins, and complement proteins (C3 and C4) showed a rapid and sawtooth-like decrease, and the serum AQP4-IgG titer declined from 1:320 to below the detectable limit at the end of the 3rd procedure. Of all the antibodies, IgG had the biggest removal rate (>96.1%), followed by IgM (>66.7%) and IgA (53%), while complement C3 and C4 also dropped by 73% and 65%, respectively. The reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α) and marked increased lymphocyte (T and B cell) counts were also observed. The improvement of symptoms initiated after the last session, with a low AQP4-IgG titer (1:32) persisting thereafter. Accordingly, protein-A immunoadsorption treatment could be one of the potential rescue therapies for steroid-resistant NMOSD patients with a severe disability.

Efficacy and safety of plasmapheresis in symptomatic hyperviscosity and cast nephropathy: A Multicenter Experience in Turkey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cast nephropathy (CN) and hyperviscosity (HV), which we encounter in plasma cell diseases, are serious clinical manifestations that increase mortality and morbidity if not managed well in the early period. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures based on the removal of patient plasma is a frequently preferred treatment modality. TPE is recommended at varying levels of evidence for the treatment of CN and HV in plasma cell disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 61 patients, 50 with multipl myeloma (MM) and 10 with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), who underwent TPE for CN and HV, were included in our multicenter, and retrospective study. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease was found in all disease-related biochemical markers, which were measured 1 week after the application of TPE added to standard medical treatment (IgG; p < 0.001, IgM; p = 0.004, IgA; p = 0.14, kappa light chain; p < 0.001, lambda light chain; p < 0.001, ß-2 microglobulin; p < 0.001, total protein; p < 0.001, albumin; p < 0.001, LDH; p = 0.02, creatine; p < 0.001, hemoglobin; p = 0.010). Clinically, all 11 patients who underwent TPE for HV responded. While a partial response (PR: 80 %) was obtained in 40 of 50 MM patients with CN, no response was obtained in 10 patients (non-response: 20 %). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it was observed that TPE reduced all biochemical markers related to HV and CN, while making a significant contribution to clinical improvement. We believe that adding TPE to the standard treatment in this patient group will reduce mortality and morbidity in the early period and have a positive effect on survival in the long term.

Case Report: Effects of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Antibodies Obtained With Double Filtration Plasmapheresis.

Passive antibody therapy has been used to treat outbreaks of viral disease, including the ongoing pandemic of severe respiratory acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19. However, the real benefits of the procedure are unclear. We infused a concentrated solution of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies obtained from a convalescent donor with a single session of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) into a 56-year-old woman with long history of unremitting, severe COVID-19. She was unable to establish an adequate antiviral immune response because of previous chemotherapy, including the infusion of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, administered to treat a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The disease promptly recovered despite evidence of no endogenous anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody production. The observation that passive antibody therapy might prove particularly effective in immunodepressed COVID-19 patients requires evaluation in prospective randomized controlled trial.

Therapeutic plasmapheresis for the treatment of thyrotoxicosis: A retrospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thyroid storm and severe thyrotoxicosis remain among the most frequent endocrine emergencies, and first-line hyperthyroidism treatment is not always an option. Since the first report in 1970, plasmapheresis is a second-line treatment for severe or otherwise untreatable thyrotoxicosis when rapid euthyroidism is desired. METHODS: We present a retrospective study of the experience in treating thyrotoxicosis with plasmapheresis between 2012 and 2020 in two specialized centers in Colombia. We register the demographic and clinical characteristic and compare the thyroid hormones and other biochemical measurements before and after treatment. RESULTS: Data from 19 patients was obtained, 58% female with a median age of 35 years (IQR 23.5), and most of them with Graves' disease. The most frequent indication for plasmapheresis was thyroid storm. A median of 4 (IQR 2) sessions lead to a significant reduction in FT4 (P .0001) and TT3 (P < .0003) with a nonsignificant decrease in beta-blocker (P .7353) dose, no change in hepatic enzymes, and no adverse events. After plasmapheresis, thyroidectomy was performed in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmapheresis is an effective and safe treatment option for reducing circulating thyroid hormones in severe thyrotoxicosis when other forms of treatment are contraindicated or in case of urgent thyroid and non-thyroid surgery. It is limited by its cost and the need for highly specialized resources.