Administrative hospitalization database validation of cardiac procedure codes.

BACKGROUND: Although cardiac procedures are commonly used to treat cardiovascular disease, they are costly. Administrative data sources could be used to track cardiac procedures, but sources of such data have not been validated against clinical registries. OBJECTIVES: To examine accuracy of cardiac procedure coding in administrative databases versus a prospective clinical registry. SAMPLE: We examined a total of 182,018 common cardiac procedures including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, valve surgery, and cardiac catheterization procedures during fiscal years 2005 and 2006 across 18 cardiac centers in Ontario, Canada. RESEARCH DESIGN: Accuracy of codes in the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) administrative databases were compared with the clinical registry of the Cardiac Care Network. RESULTS: Comparing 17,511 CIHI and 17,404 registry procedures for CABG surgery, the positive predictive value (PPV) of CIHI-coded CABG surgery was 97%. In 6229 CIHI-coded and 5885 registry-coded valve surgery procedures, the PPV of the administrative data source was 96%. Comparing 38,527 PCI procedures in CIHI to 38,601 in the registry, the PPV of CIHI was 94%. Among 119,751 CIHI-coded and 111,725 registry-coded cardiac catheterization procedures, the PPV of administrative data was 94%. When the procedure date window was expanded from the same day to ±1 days, the PPV was 96% (PCI) and exceeded 98% (CABG surgery), 97% (valve surgery), and 95% (cardiac catheterization). CONCLUSIONS: Using a clinical registry as the gold standard, the coding accuracy of common cardiac procedures in the CIHI administrative database was high.

Impact of global bundled payments on hospital costs of coronary artery bypass grafting.

The Health Care Financing Administration began the Medicare Participating Heart Bypass Center Demonstration in 1991, in which hospitals and physicians are paid a single negotiated global price for all inpatient care for heart bypass patients. This article analyzed the changes in total and departmental direct variable costs during the 1991-1993 period using micro-cost data. The results indicate that all participating hospitals had significant reductions in total direct variable costs, after controlling for preoperative risk factors and postoperative outcomes. However, the patterns in cost reductions across major departments were different across hospitals. The cost reductions primarily came from nursing intensive care unit, routine nursing, pharmacy, and catheter lab.

Role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with malignant neoplastic disease.

Although the long-term benefits of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are obvious, postoperative morbidity and mortality and the length of recovery associated with cardiopulmonary bypass are the main concerns of cardiac surgeons and cardiologists. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of the off-pump CABG for patients with concomitant malignant disorders requiring myocardial revascularization. From March 1997 to February 1999, 51 patients underwent off-pump CABG. Of these, there were 9 patients who had concomitant malignant disease requiring noncardiac surgery: gastric cancer (4), urinary bladder cancer (2), cholangioma (1), lung cancer (1) and colon cancer (1). Off-pump CABG was performed through a sternotomy, left thoracotomy or subxiphoid incision. Five patients received single grafting and 4 received double. The mean operative time for the off-pump CABG was 167 min. The total amount of bleeding during the off-pump CABG was 450-890 ml. Simultaneous noncardiac operations were carried out in 5 patients. The other 4 patients underwent subsequent operations for the malignancy uneventfully. In contrast, of the 4 patients with concomitant malignant disorders who underwent standard CABG during the period before the use of off-pump CABG, 2 died without undergoing the subsequent noncardiac operation. Off-pump CABG is quite efficient and is of great advantage in patients with malignancy who require myocardial revascularization in addition to noncardiac surgery for the cancer.

The impact of reimbursement changes for intracoronary stents on providers and Medicare.

CONTEXT: New Medicare reimbursement policies will move stents into a different diagnosis-related group (DRG) than conventional balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]). OBJECTIVE: To examine the financial impact on hospitals and Medicare of these planned changes, taking into account costs, reimbursement, and the cost-offset effect of prevented complications. DESIGN: The economic impact of proposed reimbursement changes was modeled by using a retrospective clinical and economic data set from a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 421 consecutive interventional cases from 1996 were examined by using actual cost data. The new, proposed revenues were assigned to these cases. From the hospitals' perspective, the focus was on contribution margin (the difference between revenues and costs), risk adjusted for case-mix severity. From Medicare's perspective, the focus was on expenditures. Various assumptions were adopted for two clinical variables: the effectiveness of stents in preventing the major PTCA-related complications of myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the relative proportions of myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the mix of complications. Under current Medicare DRG policies, coronary artery bypass graft surgery is highly profitable for hospitals, whereas myocardial infarction as a complication of PTCA has a negative financial impact. RESULTS: Under the new Medicare reimbursement policies, hospitals experience higher profitability with stents than with conventional PTCA under most assumed levels of clinical effectiveness and mixes of myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For Medicare, under most circumstances (including percentages of stent use and levels of clinical effectiveness that represent contemporary practice) stents lead to greater expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursement changes will substantially realign previously misaligned financial and clinical incentives for hospitals. The immediate effect on hospitals will be to enhance profitability, whereas the effect on Medicare will be to increase expenditures.

Selection of patients for same-day coronary bypass operations.

Between March 15, 1990, and December 31, 1991, we admitted to the Virginia Mason Hospital for isolated coronary bypass operations 175 consecutive patients with chronic, stable angina pectoris who had prior coronary arteriography. One hundred patients were admitted on the same day as their operations, and 75 patients, deemed to be at higher risk, were admitted 1 day before the operation. Postoperative progress of all patients was monitored by means of a clinical pathway form with physiologic and activity measures plotted against postoperative days. We found no difference in age, sex, or total number of comorbidity factors. Diabetes and ejection fraction less than 0.50 were significantly more common in preoperatively admitted patients and were independently predictive of admitting group. Significant differences between surgeons in the proportion of same-day patients admitted could not be explained by differences in common risk factors. There was no significant difference in postoperative major or minor complications or number of clinical pathway deviations, but two deaths occurred in patients admitted preoperatively. Average total hospital stay was 1 1/2 days less for same-day patients, a highly significant difference. Total hospital charges averaged $19,000 for the series and were $286 more for preoperatively admitted patients, a difference that was not statistically significant. Patients admitted selectively for same-day coronary bypass are not at risk for an increased number of complications. Although their hospital stay is reduced, the reduction of their hospital charges is minimal. Preoperative admission of patients with comorbidity requiring medical management or with physical incapacity remains justified, and admitting decisions should remain with the operating surgeon, not third parties.

A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective regional study was conducted to determine if the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are solely the result of differences in patient case mix. DESIGN-Regional prospective cohort study. Data including patient demographic and historical data, body surface area, cardiac catheterization results, priority of surgery, comorbidity, and status at hospital discharge were collected. This study presents data for 3055 CABG patients between July 1, 1987, and April 15, 1989. SETTING: This study includes data from all surgeons performing cardiothoracic surgery in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont; the data were collected from five regional medical centers. PATIENTS: Data were collected from all consecutive isolated CABG surgery patients during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and adjusted in-hospital mortality rates associated with CABG. MAIN RESULTS: The overall crude in-hospital mortality rate for isolated CABG was 4.3%. The rate varied among centers (range, 3.1% to 6.3%) and among surgeons (range, 1.9% to 9.2%). Predictors of in-hospital mortality included increased age, female gender, small body surface area, greater comorbidity, reoperation, poorer cardiac function as indicated by a lower ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure and emergent or urgent surgery. After adjusting for the effects of potentially confounding variables, substantial and statistically significant variability was observed among medical centers (P = .021) and among surgeons (P = .025). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates among institutions and among surgeons in northern New England are not solely the result of differences in case mix as described by these variables and may reflect differences in currently unknown aspects of patient care. Understanding this variation requires a detailed understanding of the processes of care.

Differences in mortality from coronary artery bypass graft surgery at five teaching hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To measure hospital- and surgeon-specific mortality rates for patients with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to examine possible reasons for any differences. DESIGN: Cohort study using hospital discharge abstracts and itemized bills. SETTING: Five major teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, Pa. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of all 4613 patients over a 30-month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In hospital mortality rates. RESULTS: We observed differences in hospital mortality rates for patients who underwent coronary artery catheterization and CABG surgery during the same admission (diagnosis related group 106) but not for patients who underwent only CABG surgery during the admission (diagnosis related group 107). There were threefold differences in surgeon-specific mortality rates. The hospital mortality rates for coronary artery catheterization and CABG surgery during the same admission changed during the study and coincided with moves of surgeons among study hospitals. Our measures of illness severity did identify patients who were more likely to die, but differences in severity of illness did not explain differences in hospital- or surgeon-specific mortality rates. Patient mortality rates were not associated with the volume of procedures performed by individual surgeons. We found inconclusive evidence for an association with surgeons' clinical skills, and to a lesser extent, with the hospital's volume of procedures and the hospital's organization and staffing. A greater intensity of hospital services was not necessary for a lower mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that studies of CABG mortality should examine mortality rates by diagnosis related group, collect data from more than 1 year, examine associations with surgeons' clinical skills, include information on hospital organization and staffing, and cautiously explore more efficient ways of providing care.

Bridge saphenous vein graft.

Single aorta-coronary artery vein grafts (bridge grafts) were constructed to two coronary branches with a side-to-side anastomosis in 250 patients. Most of these grafts were constructed between circumflex branches (96 grafts), circumflex and diagnol branches (47 grafts), and anterior descending and diagonol branches (79 grafts). The aim of the bridge graft is to decrease the number of anastomoses, decrease the operative time, and improve graft patency. The hospital mortality rate in this group of patients was 1.2 per cent, and the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction was 3.6 per cent. One hundred ten patients were restudied after surgery; the average time of restudy was 1 year. Ninety-two grafts of 83.6 per cent had two anastomosis patent; 6 grafts (5.4 per cent) had one anastomosis patent; and in 12 grafts (10.9 per cent), both anastomoses were occluded. One hundred twenty-six associated grafts were studied all the same time; the patency rate was 84.1 per cent. From this experience, we believe the bridge graft is a useful procedure for bypassing the small coronary artery branches.

Aortocoronary bypass-classification and results.

Technical, physiologic, metabolic, and pathologic factors combine to determine the long-term patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. Numerous variables are present in each of these categories, and the results of the operation cannot be determined unless comparable groups of patients are studied objectively. The classification proposed in this paper takes into account many of the factors that can effect graft patency. The available results of direct coronary arterial surgery are stated and used as the basis for five-year projections in the context of the proposed classification system.