Immediate and controlled-release pregabalin for the treatment of epilepsy.

Introduction: Epilepsy is a common neurological disease requiring complex therapies, which are unable to achieve seizure control in 30% of patients. Poor adherence has been recognized as a possible determinant of drug-resistance. Prolonged-release formulations of antiepileptic drugs might help increase adherence and minimize side effects.Areas covered: Pregabalin (PGB) has peculiar pharmacodynamics and almost ideal pharmacokinetics, except for a short half-life and therefore requiring multiple daily dosing. PGB immediate-release (IR) is effective in focal-onset epilepsy (FOE), neuropathic pain, generalized anxiety disorder, and fibromyalgia, despite some tolerability issues, especially at higher doses. The controlled-release formulation (CR) shares PGB IR advantages and requires slight dose adjustments to guarantee bioavailability. In 2014, PGB CR (165 and 330 mg/day) failed to prove superior to placebo in a randomized placebo-controlled trial on 323 subjects with drug-resistant FOE, although it was just as tolerable. Therefore, PGB CR is not currently licensed for epilepsy.Expert opinion: Considering the disappointing results of the only controlled trial, PGB CR is unlikely to become an established epilepsy treatment anytime soon. Nevertheless, given its peculiar properties and potential advantages, PGB (in either formulation) should be further evaluated in specific populations of patients, especially fragile subjects with several comorbidities and complex polytherapies.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Pregabalin Extended-Release in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Fibromyalgia, and Partial-Onset Seizures.

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to characterize the properties of pregabalin extended-release (ER) in healthy volunteers and was subsequently applied to patient data from efficacy/safety studies investigating pregabalin ER for postherpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, and partial-onset seizures. The impact of demographic and other covariates on PK was assessed, and various dosing scenarios were simulated to inform pregabalin ER dosing/administration instructions. Phase 1 and 3 models were developed using data from 14 phase 1 studies (12 627 samples from 335 participants receiving pregabalin immediate-release [IR] or ER) and 3 phase 3 studies (2591 samples from 1235 patients receiving pregabalin ER), respectively. Final phase 1 and 3 models adequately characterized the data. Several covariates were statistically significant, but renal function (creatinine clearance) was considered the only clinically relevant covariate. The relationship between creatinine clearance and pregabalin clearance was reasonably consistent between phase 1 and 3 models and with that reported previously with pregabalin IR data alone. Patients with moderate renal impairment who received pregabalin ER 82.5 mg once daily (QD) had similar predicted area under the plasma concentration-time curve and peak plasma concentration values as patients with normal/mild renal impairment who received 165 mg QD. Ranges in predicted PK parameters after switching from pregabalin IR administered in the morning to ER after a meal at 3, 6, or 9 pm were similar. Administration of a missed evening dose at bedtime with food or the next morning with food did not result in clinically important changes in predicted PK parameters.

Impact of Cachexia and Opioid Analgesic Cotreatment on Pregabalin Pharmacokinetics and Central Nervous System Symptoms in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer receiving pregabalin potentially have a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical factors influencing the incidence of CNS symptoms, including plasma pregabalin exposure, cancer cachexia, and opioid analgesic cotreatment. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with cancer receiving twice-daily pregabalin were enrolled. Plasma concentrations of pregabalin, clinical laboratory data, opioid analgesic cotreatment, and the Glasgow Prognostic Score, which is an inflammation-based cachexia score, were considered as clinical factors. The incidence of CNS symptoms was collected from the patients' medical records. The predose plasma concentrations of pregabalin at steady state were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The steady-state trough plasma pregabalin concentrations showed a large variability with an interquartile range of 0.43-1.2 mg/L per mg/kg and were negatively correlated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). C-reactive protein (standardized partial regression coefficient, ß = 0.31) and opioid analgesic cotreatment (ß = 0.24) were also identified in addition to eGFR (ß = -0.60) in the multiple regression analysis. The incidence of CNS symptoms was significantly increased with opioid analgesic cotreatment and a higher Glasgow Prognostic Score but not with the absolute value of plasma pregabalin concentrations, eGFR, or other clinical laboratory data. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer, steady-state trough plasma pregabalin concentrations were altered with renal function, systemic inflammation, and opioid analgesic cotreatment. However, a higher incidence of CNS symptoms observed in patients with cancer on pregabalin was more related to cachexia and opioid analgesic cotreatment than to altered pregabalin concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of pregabalin suppositories based on pharmacological research.

OBJECTIVES: As commercially available pregabalin preparations are limited to oral administration, it is impossible to use it as an adjuvant analgesic for neuropathic cancer-related pain in terminally ill cancer patients with oral feeding difficulties. The objective of this study was to develop a pregabalin suppository to be available at hospitals. METHODS: Pregabalin suppositories were prepared using bases comprising six different compositions of Witepsol H-15, Witepsol S-55, and Witepsol E-75. The suppository release test and stability test were performed in vitro. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the suppositories were assessed in rats. KEY FINDINGS: In the in vitro releasing test, the pregabalin suppositories with H-15, H-15 : S-55 = 1 : 1, H-15 : S-55 = 2 : 1, H-15 : S-55 = 1 : 2 released approximately 100% of the pregabalin within 180 min. Among these pregabalin suppositories, only the suppository with H-15 : S-55 = 2 : 1 demonstrated an equivalent AUC0-∞ with the oral administration group. Consistent with the results of the pharmacokinetic study, the pregabalin suppository with H-15 : S-55 = 2 : 1 exhibited antinociceptive effects. In addition, the pregabalin suppository with H-15 : S-55 = 2 : 1 was stable for 12 weeks when refrigerated with light shielding. CONCLUSIONS: The pregabalin suppositories prepared in this study may be applicable for pain control for terminally cancer ill patients with oral feeding difficulties.

Preparation and evaluation of non-effervescent gastroretentive tablets containing pregabalin for once-daily administration and dose proportional pharmacokinetics.

The main purpose of this study was to develop gastroretentive tablets with floating and swelling properties for once-daily administration of pregabalin. The non-effervescent floating and swelling tablets were prepared using wet granulation and compaction, which are widely used and easily accessible. All formulations showed sustained release patterns and maintained buoyancy for over 24 h. The amount of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and crospovidone were found to be critical factors affecting in vitro dissolution and floating properties of the prepared tablets. The optimized tablets containing 300 mg of pregabalin started to float within 3 min and swelled above 12.8 mm, the reported pyloric sphincter diameter during the fed state, in all dimensions including length, width, and thickness. In vivo results in beagle dogs indicated that the optimized formulations are suitable as once-daily dosage forms, and dose proportionality was observed in doses ranging from 75 to 300 mg. Additionally, the dogs administered with the formulation having poor in vitro gastroretentive properties showed highly variable and reduced extent of absorption, signifying the necessity of the gastroretentive drug delivery system. In conclusion, the developed non-effervescent floating tablets are promising candidates for once-daily delivery of pregabalin.

Controlled-release pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disorder whose symptoms of musculo-skeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairment pervade the personal, occupational, and social aspects of a patient's life. Together with the antidepressants duloxetine and milnacipran, the anticonvulsant pregabalin (PGB) is one of the three drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of FM. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the data relating to the efficacy and safety of the controlled-release formulation of PGB (PGB-CR) in patients with FM. Areas covered: Efforts by the pharmaceutical industry have led to the introduction of new formulations of already approved drugs to enhance treatment convenience and adherence. Expert opinion: Although there are no published studies specifically comparing PGB-CR and PGB-IR formulations in FM patients, the efficacy and safety profiles of PGB-CR seem to be similar to those of the IR formulation, and the convenience of once-daily dosing potentially enhances patient compliance. However, the amount of evidence is not sufficient to draw any definite conclusions, and further studies of larger patient samples are needed.