Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 154
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 73, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring contributions from multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges. To meet those challenges, we established an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH with a central coordination and a one-stop- concept. Here, we aimed to evaluate effects of this concept on sick leave, presenteeism, and health care utilization. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we compared the one-stop era with integrated care (IC, 1-JUL-2021 to 31-DEC-2022) to a reference group receiving standard care (SC, 1-JUL-2018 to 31-DEC-2019) regarding economic outcome parameters assessed over 6 months. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female: 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age: 33.6 vs. 32.8 years, educational level: ≥9 years of education 60.0% vs. 59.3%; located in Vienna 75.3% vs. 76.5%). Compared to SC, the IC group showed significantly fewer days with sick leave or presenteeism (-5 days/month), fewer unscheduled contacts for IIH-specific problems (-2.3/month), and fewer physician or hospital contacts in general (-4.1 contacts/month). Subgroup analyses of patients with migration background and language barrier consistently indicated stronger effects of the IC concept in these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary integrated management significantly improves the burden of IIH in terms of sick leave, presenteeism and healthcare consultations - particularly in socioeconomically underprivileged patient groups.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Presenteísmo , Pseudotumor Cerebral , Licença Médica , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Presenteísmo/estatística & dados numéricos , Pseudotumor Cerebral/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 529-535, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693093

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts. PATIENTS: Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25). CONCLUSION: We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Reoperação , Humanos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Criança , Adulto , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante Coclear/tendências , Adolescente , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Escolar , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Lactente , Estudos de Coortes
3.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241258948, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare screening identifies factors that impact patient health and well-being. Hunger as a Vital Sign (HVS) is widely applied as a screening tool to assess food security. However, there are no common practice screening questions to identify patients who are nutrition insecure or acquire free food from community-based organizations. This study used self-reported survey data from a non-Medicaid insured adult population approximately one year after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (2021). The survey examined the extent to which the HVS measure might have under-estimated population-level food insecurity and/or nutrition insecurity, as well as under-identified food and nutrition insecurity among patients being screened for social risks in the healthcare setting. METHODS: Data from a 2021 English-only mailed/online survey were analyzed for 2791 Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) non-Medicaid insured members ages 35-85 years. Sociodemographics, financial strain, food insecurity, acquiring free food from community-based organizations, and nutrition insecurity were assessed. Data from respondents' electronic health records were abstracted to identify adults with diet-related chronic health conditions. Data were weighted to the age × sex × racial/ethnic composition of the 2019 KPNC adult membership. Differences between groups were evaluated for statistical significance using adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) derived from modified log Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 8.5% of participants reported moderate or high food insecurity, 7.7% had acquired free food from community-based organizations, and 13% had nutrition insecurity. Black and Latino adults were significantly more likely than White adults to have food insecurity (17.4% and 13.1% vs 5.6%, aPRs = 2.97 and 2.19), acquired free food from community-based organizations (15.1% and 15.3% vs 4.1%, aPRs = 3.74 and 3.93), nutrition insecurity (22.1% and 23.9% vs 7.9%, aPRs = 2.65 and 2.64), and food and nutrition insecurity (32.4% and 32.5% vs 12.3%, aPRs = 2.54 and 2.44). Almost 20% of adults who had been diagnosed with diabetes, prediabetes, ischemic CAD, or heart failure were food insecure and 14% were nutrition insecure. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding food-related healthcare screening to identify and assess food insecurity, nutrition insecurity, and use of community-based emergency food resources together is essential for supporting referrals that will help patients achieve optimal health.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Insegurança Alimentar , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 301-305, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555649

RESUMO

Countless biomarkers continue to be identified and analysed in the modern era of omics focused research, with innumerable articles purporting clinical utility and bolstering optimism for truly personalised cancer care. While many commentaries have expounded on the complexities of biomarker development, validation and reporting, the monumental challenge of integrating this research into clinical practice has to date received little attention. The challenges are multitude; variable and sometimes contradictory findings across studies for individual biomarkers, a rapidly evolving landscape with new biomarkers continually being presented and tendency to examine each biomarker in isolation. Here, using examples from colorectal cancer, we explore the difficulties for the practicing clinician in interpreting and integrating novel biomarkers. Here, we present the '4Cs' to interrogate the biomarker literature, including analysis of the credibility, consistency, completeness and context of the biomarker research, and suggest a framework to frame the literature moving forward.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências
5.
Maturitas ; 150: 1-6, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34274071

RESUMO

AIM: This longitudinal secondary analysis of the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) aimed to test whether the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Step 1 screening tool is able to identify people at risk of developing frailty and disability in basic (ADL) and instrumental (IADL) activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Seven hundred and fifty-nine (n = 759) non-demented participants of the MAPT aged 70-89 years were assessed in memory clinics in France between 2008 and 2013. METHODS: We measured six intrinsic capacity (IC) impairments, adapted from the ICOPE screening tool. We used Cox models to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of incident frailty and IADL/ADL disability. Incident frailty was defined by Fried's phenotype, and incident disability was measured according to Lawton and Katz for IADLs and ADLs. RESULTS: Limited mobility (HR= 2.97, 95%CI= 1.85-4.76), depressive symptoms (HR= 2.07, 95%CI= 1.03-4.19), and visual impairment (HR= 1.70, 95%CI 1.01-2.86) were associated with a higher incidence of frailty over 5 years. Each additional IC condition demonstrated a positive association with a higher risk of incident frailty, IADL, ADL disability, with risk increased by 47%, 27%, and 23% over 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Screening for IC impairments identifies older adults at higher risk of incident frailty and incident IADL/ADL disability. It is relevant to screen for these impairments together because the risk of frailty and disability increases with each additional one. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00672685.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Doença de Alzheimer/fisiopatologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Vida Independente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa
6.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 22(4): e646-e653, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582071

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is responsible for the most cancer-related deaths in the United States. A better understanding of treatment-related disparities and ways to address them are important to improving survival for patients with metastatic NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database. Included in this analysis were 107,116 patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated at academic centers (AC), community-based centers (CC), and integrated centers (IC) between 2004 and 2015. The primary end point was overall survival, with comparisons of AC, CC, and IC. RESULTS: The survival disparity between AC and CC continued to grow over the study period, from a 5.7% difference in 2-year survival to a 7.5% difference. Treatment at IC was initially associated with survival similar to CC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93), however, later in the study period treatment at IC improved (HR, 0.74) outpacing the improvement in survival in CC (HR, 0.82) but not to the same degree as the improvement in AC (HR, 0.64). The improvement in survival at IC was noted predominantly in patients with adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.72; P < .001) but not in squamous-cell carcinoma (HR, 0.89; P value not significant). CONCLUSION: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC at IC was associated with improved survival during our study period compared with treatment at CC. This appeared to be histology-dependent, suggesting a treatment-related improvement in survival because over this period newer therapies were preferentially available for adenocarcinoma. Integrating care across treatment facilities might be one way to bridge the growing gap in survival between AC and CC.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
7.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(4): e431-e445, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) care and treatment will require simplified service delivery models. We aimed to evaluate the effects of decentralisation and integration of testing, care, and treatment with harm-reduction and other services, and task-shifting to non-specialists on outcomes across the HCV care continuum. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, WHO Global Index Medicus, and conference abstracts for studies published between Jan 1, 2008, and Feb 20, 2018, that evaluated uptake of HCV testing, linkage to care, treatment, cure assessment, and sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) in people who inject drugs, people in prisons, people living with HIV, and the general population. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Studies with a sample size of ten or less for the largest denominator were excluded. Studies were categorised according to the level of decentralisation: full (testing and treatment at same site), partial (testing at decentralised site and referral elsewhere for treatment), or none. Task-shifting was categorised as treatment by specialists or non-specialists. Data on outcomes across the HCV care continuum (linkage to care, treatment uptake, and SVR12) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. FINDINGS: Our search identified 8050 reports, of which 132 met the eligibility criteria, and an additional ten reports were identified from reference citations and grey literature. Therefore, the final synthesis included 142 studies from 34 countries (20 [14%] studies from low-income and middle-income countries) and a total of 489 996 patients (239 446 [49%] from low-income and middle-income countries). Rates of linkage to care were higher with full decentralisation compared with partial or no decentralisation among people who inject drugs (full 72% [95% CI 57-85] vs partial 53% [38-67] vs none 47% [11-84]) and among people in prisons (full 94% [79-100] vs partial 50% [29-71]), although the CIs overlap for people who inject drugs. Similarly, treatment uptake was higher with full decentralisation compared with partial or no decentralisation (people who inject drugs: full 73% [65-80] vs partial 66% [55-77] vs none 35% [23-48]; people in prisons: full 72% [48-91] vs partial 39% [17-63]), although CIs overlap for full versus partial decentralisation. The results in the general population studies were more heterogeneous. SVR12 rates were high (≥90%) across different levels of decentralisation in all populations. Task-shifting of care and treatment to a non-specialist was associated with similar SVR12 rates to treatment delivered by specialists. There was a severe or critical risk of bias for 46% of studies, and heterogeneity across studies tended to be very high (I2>90%). INTERPRETATION: Decentralisation and integration of HCV care to harm-reduction sites or primary care showed some evidence of improved access to testing, linkage to care, and treatment, and task-shifting of care and treatment to non-specialists was associated with similarly high cure rates to care delivered by specialists, across a range of populations and settings. These findings provide support for the adoption of decentralisation and task-shifting to non-specialists in national HCV programmes. FUNDING: Unitaid.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Modelos Organizacionais , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resposta Viral Sustentada
8.
Health Serv Res ; 55 Suppl 3: 1062-1072, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284522

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine system integration with physician specialties across markets and the association between local system characteristics and their patterns of physician integration. DATA SOURCES: Data come from the AHRQ Compendium of US Health Systems and IQVIA OneKey database. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the change from 2016 to 2018 in the percentage of physicians in systems, focusing on primary care and the 10 most numerous nonhospital-based specialties across the 382 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the US. We also categorized systems by ownership, mission, and payment program participation and examined how those characteristics were related to their patterns of physician integration in 2018. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We examined local healthcare markets (MSAs) and the hospitals and physicians that are part of integrated systems that operate in these markets. We characterized markets by hospital and insurer concentration and systems by type of ownership and by whether they have an academic medical center (AMC), a 340B hospital, or accountable care organization. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between 2016 and 2018, system participation increased for primary care and the 10 other physician specialties we examined. In 2018, physicians in specialties associated with lucrative hospital services were the most commonly integrated with systems including hematology-oncology (57%), cardiology (55%), and general surgery (44%); however, rates varied substantially across markets. For most specialties, high market concentration by insurers and hospital-systems was associated with lower rates of physician integration. In addition, systems with AMCs and publicly owned systems more commonly affiliated with specialties unrelated to the physicians' potential contribution to hospital revenue, and investor-owned systems demonstrated more limited physician integration. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in physician integration across markets and system characteristics reflects physician and systems' motivations. These integration strategies are associated with the financial interests of systems and other strategic goals (eg, medical education, and serving low-income populations).


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialização/estatística & dados numéricos , Integração de Sistemas , Competição Econômica , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguradoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
9.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33317088

RESUMO

The goal of coordinating pathways for cancer patients through their diagnostic and treatment journey is often approached by borrowing strategies from traditional industries, including standardization, process redesign, and variation reduction. However, the usefulness of these strategies is sometimes limited in the face of the complexity and uncertainty that characterize these processes over time and the situation at both patient and institutional levels. We found this to be the case when we did an in-depth qualitative study of coordination processes in patient pathways for three diagnoses in four Norwegian hospitals. What allows these hospitals to accomplish coordination is supplementing standardization with improvisation. This improvisation is embedded in four types of emerging semi-formal structures: collegial communities, networks, boundary spanners, and physical proximity. The hierarchical higher administrative levels appear to have a limited ability to manage and support coordination of these emerging structures when needed. We claim that this can be explained by viewing line management as representative of an economic-administrative institutional logic while these emerging structures represent a medical-professional logic that privileges proximity to the variation and complexity in the situations. The challenge is then to find a way for emergent and formal structures to coexist.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Noruega , Pesquisa Qualitativa
10.
Health Serv Res ; 55 Suppl 3: 1107-1117, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094846

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess racial and ethnic disparities in care for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries and whether disparities differ between health system-affiliated physician organizations (POs) and nonaffiliated POs. DATA SOURCES: We used Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty (MD-PPAS), Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS), IRS Form 990, 100% Medicare FFS claims, and race/ethnicity estimated using the Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding 2.0 algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Using a sample of 16 007 POs providing primary care in 2015, we assessed racial/ethnic disparities on 12 measures derived from claims (2 cancer screenings; diabetic eye examinations; continuity of care; two medication adherence measures; three measures of follow-up visits after acute care; all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, all-cause readmissions, and ambulatory care-sensitive admissions). We decomposed these "total" disparities into within-PO and between-PO components using models with PO random effects. We then pair-matched 1853 of these POs that were affiliated with health systems to similar nonaffiliated POs. We examined differences in within-PO disparities by affiliation status by interacting each nonwhite race/ethnicity with an affiliation indicator. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty identified POs billing Medicare; PECOS and IRS Form 990 identified health system affiliations. Beneficiaries age 18 and older were attributed to POs using a plurality visit rule. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We observed total disparities in 12 of 36 comparisons between white and nonwhite beneficiaries; nonwhites received worse care in 10. Within-PO disparities exceeded between-PO disparities and were substantively important (>=5 percentage points or>=0.2 standardized differences) in nine of the 12 comparisons. Among these 12, nonaffiliated POs had smaller disparities than affiliated POs in two comparisons (P < .05): 1.6 percentage points smaller black-white disparities in follow-up after ED visits and 0.6 percentage points smaller Hispanic-white disparities in breast cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS: We find no evidence that system-affiliated POs have smaller racial and ethnic disparities than nonaffiliated POs. Where differences existed, disparities were slightly larger in affiliated POs.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática de Grupo/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos
11.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 44(12): 2545-2554, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unhealthy alcohol use among persons living with HIV (PLWH) is linked to significant morbidity, and use of alcohol services may differ by HIV status. Our objective was to compare unhealthy alcohol use screening and treatment by HIV status in primary care. METHODS: Cohort study of adult (≥18 years) PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants frequency matched 20:1 to PLWH by age, sex, and race/ethnicity who were enrolled in a large integrated healthcare system in the United States, with information ascertained from an electronic health record. Outcomes included unhealthy alcohol screening, prevalence, provider-delivered brief interventions, and addiction specialty care visits. Other predictors included age, sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood deprivation index, depression, smoking, substance use disorders, Charlson comorbidity index, prior outpatient visits, insurance type, and medical facility. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) for the outcomes of time to unhealthy alcohol use screening and time to first addiction specialty visit. Poisson regression with robust standard errors was used to compute prevalence ratios (PR) for other outcomes. RESULTS: 11,235 PLWH and 227,320 HIV-uninfected participants were included. By 4.5 years after baseline, most participants were screened for unhealthy alcohol use (85% of PLWH and 93% of HIV-uninfected), but with a lower rate among PLWH (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.85). PLWH were less likely, compared with HIV-uninfected participants, to report unhealthy drinking among those screened (adjusted PR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.79), and among those who screened positive, less likely to receive brief interventions (adjusted PR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.90), but more likely (adjusted HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4) to have an addiction specialty visit within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Unhealthy alcohol use was lower in PLWH, but the treatment approach by HIV status differed. PLWH reporting unhealthy alcohol use received less brief interventions and more addiction specialty care than HIV-uninfected participants.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo/complicações , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Alcoolismo/diagnóstico , Alcoolismo/terapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição de Poisson , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
12.
PLoS Med ; 17(10): e1003367, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007052

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetes outcomes are influenced by host factors, settings, and care processes. We examined the association of data-driven integrated care assisted by information and communications technology (ICT) with clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes in public and private healthcare settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The web-based Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) platform provides a protocol to guide data collection for issuing a personalized JADE report including risk categories (1-4, low-high), 5-year probabilities of cardiovascular-renal events, and trends and targets of 4 risk factors with tailored decision support. The JADE program is a prospective cohort study implemented in a naturalistic environment where patients underwent nurse-led structured evaluation (blood/urine/eye/feet) in public and private outpatient clinics and diabetes centers in Hong Kong. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 16,624 Han Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in 2007-2015. In the public setting, the non-JADE group (n = 3,587) underwent structured evaluation for risk factors and complications only, while the JADE (n = 9,601) group received a JADE report with group empowerment by nurses. In a community-based, nurse-led, university-affiliated diabetes center (UDC), the JADE-Personalized (JADE-P) group (n = 3,436) received a JADE report, personalized empowerment, and annual telephone reminder for reevaluation and engagement. The primary composite outcome was time to the first occurrence of cardiovascular-renal diseases, all-site cancer, and/or death, based on hospitalization data censored on 30 June 2017. During 94,311 person-years of follow-up in 2007-2017, 7,779 primary events occurred. Compared with the JADE group (136.22 cases per 1,000 patient-years [95% CI 132.35-140.18]), the non-JADE group had higher (145.32 [95% CI 138.68-152.20]; P = 0.020) while the JADE-P group had lower event rates (70.94 [95% CI 67.12-74.91]; P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the primary composite outcome were 1.22 (95% CI 1.15-1.30) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.66-0.75), respectively, independent of risk profiles, education levels, drug usage, self-care, and comorbidities at baseline. We reported consistent results in propensity-score-matched analyses and after accounting for loss to follow-up. Potential limitations include its nonrandomized design that precludes causal inference, residual confounding, and participation bias. CONCLUSIONS: ICT-assisted integrated care was associated with a reduction in clinical events, including death in type 2 diabetes in public and private healthcare settings.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Autocuidado/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Can J Surg ; 63(5): E442-E448, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026310

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of physician assistants (PAs) in surgical care in Canada is expanding. Similarly, the acute care surgery (ACS) model continues to evolve, and PAs are increasingly being considered as members of ACS teams. However, their exact impact and contribution has not been well studied. Our study describes the contribution of a PA who worked full time on weekdays on an ACS team in a Canadian academic tertiary hospital. METHODS: To quantify the PA's contributions, an ACS database was created in September 2016. Data on the number of ACS patient encounters, the number of ACS surgical consults, the number of ACS admissions, the PA's involvement in the operating room, the number of PA patient encounters and the number of multidisciplinary meetings were prospectively collected. We report data for 365 consecutive days from Dec. 30, 2016, to Dec. 29, 2017. RESULTS: The ACS team had 11 651 patient encounters during the year, with a mean of 31.92 per day. The mean number of surgical consults per day was 5.89, and a mean of 2.08 surgical procedures were performed per day. The PA was involved in 53.5% of all patient encounters, despite working only during daytime hours on weekdays. Multidisciplinary meetings were conducted by the PA 94.9% of the time. Alternate level of care patients were seen by the PA 96.2% of the time. The PA was directly involved in 2.0% of the operating room procedures during the study period. CONCLUSION: Integrating a PA on an ACS team adds value to patient care by providing consistency and efficient management of ward issues and patient care plans, including multidisciplinary discharge planning, timely emergency department consultations and effective organization of the ACS team members.


CONTEXTE: Les adjoints au médecin (AM) jouent un rôle croissant dans les soins chirurgicaux au Canada. Suivant la même tendance, le modèle de chirurgie en soins actifs (CSA) poursuit son évolution, et on considère de plus en plus les AM comme des membres des équipes de CSA. Cependant, les retombées de leur travail et leur contribution ont été peu étudiées, et de façon imprécise. Notre étude décrit la contribution d'un AM travaillant à temps plein, en semaine, au sein d'une équipe de CSA dans un centre hospitalier universitaire canadien de soins tertiaires. MÉTHODES: Afin de quantifier la contribution de l'AM, nous avons créé une base de données de CSA en septembre 2016. Nous avons collecté les données ­ nombre de rencontres avec des patients, de consultations et d'admissions de l'équipe; participation de l'AM au bloc opératoire; nombre de rencontres de l'AM avec des patients; nombre de réunions multidisciplinaires ­ de manière prospective. Nos données décrivent une période de 365 jours consécutifs, qui s'étale du 30 décembre 2016 au 29 décembre 2017. RÉSULTATS: L'équipe de CSA a tenu 11 651 rencontres avec des patients dans l'année, pour une moyenne de 31,92 par jour. En moyenne, elle a réalisé 5,89 consultations et 2,08 interventions chirurgicales quotidiennement. L'AM a participé à 53,5 % des rencontres avec les patients, et ce malgré son horaire de jour et de semaine. L'AM a aussi dirigé 94,9 % des réunions multidisciplinaires, a vu 96,2 % des patients d'autres niveaux de soins, et a participé à 2,0 % des interventions au bloc opératoire. CONCLUSION: L'intégration d'un AM aux équipes de CSA est une valeur ajoutée pour les soins aux patients. Elle contribue à la gestion cohérente et efficace des événements au sein du service et des plans de soins, y compris la planification multidisciplinaire des congés, les consultations rapides à l'urgence et l'organisation efficace de l'équipe.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Assistentes Médicos/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Salas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistentes Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
J Infect Dis ; 222(Suppl 5): S384-S391, 2020 09 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32877565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, many opioid treatment programs (OTPs) do not offer viral hepatitis (VH) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing despite high prevalence among OTP clients. We initiated an opt-out VH and HIV testing and linkage-to-care program within our OTP. METHODS: All OTP intakes are screened for VH and HIV and evaluated for rescreening annually. A patient navigator reviews laboratory results and provides counseling in the OTP clinic. The medical record is queried to identify individuals with previously diagnosed, untreated VH or HIV. Navigation support is provided for linkage or relinkage to VH or HIV care. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and Februrary 2019, 532 individuals were screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV), 180 tested HCV antibody positive (34%), and 108 were HCV-ribonucleic acid (RNA) positive (20%). Sixty individuals were identified with previously diagnosed, untreated HCV. Of all HCV RNA+, 49% reported current injection drug use (82 of 168). Ninety-five individuals were seen by an HCV specialist (57% of HCV RNA+), 72 started treatment (43%), and 69 (41%) completed treatment. Individuals with primary care providers were most likely to start treatment. Four individuals were diagnosed with hepatitis B; 0 were diagnosed with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an OTP-based screening and navigation protocol has enabled significant gains in the identification and treatment of VH in this high prevalence setting.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/isolamento & purificação , Colorado/epidemiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , HIV/genética , HIV/imunologia , HIV/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Teste de HIV/estatística & dados numéricos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/imunologia , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/terapia , Hepatite C/transmissão , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias/organização & administração
15.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237772, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substance use is common among people living with HIV and has been associated with suboptimal HIV treatment outcomes. Integrating substance use services into HIV care is a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: We report on substance use education, screening, and referral practices from two surveys of HIV care and treatment sites participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. HIV care and treatment sites participating in IeDEA are primarily public-sector health facilities and include both academic and community-based hospitals and health facilities. A total of 286 sites in 45 countries participated in the 2014-2015 survey and 237 sites in 44 countries participated in the 2017 survey. We compared changes over time for 147 sites that participated in both surveys. RESULTS: In 2014-2015, most sites (75%) reported providing substance use-related education on-site (i.e., at the HIV clinic or the same health facility). Approximately half reported on-site screening for substance use (52%) or referrals for substance use treatment (51%). In 2017, the proportion of sites providing on-site substance use-related education, screening, or referrals increased by 9%, 16%, and 8%, respectively. In 2017, on-site substance use screening and referral were most commonly reported at sites serving only adults (compared to only children/adolescents or adults and children/adolescents; screening: 86%, 37%, and 59%, respectively; referral: 76%, 47%, and 46%, respectively) and at sites in high-income countries (compared to upper middle income, lower middle income or low-income countries; screening: 89%, 76%, 68%, and 45%, respectively; referral: 82%, 71%, 57%, and 34%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although there have been increases in the proportion of sites reporting substance use education, screening, and referral services across IeDEA sites, gaps persist in the integration of substance use services into HIV care, particularly in relation to screening and referral practices, with reduced availability for children/adolescents and those receiving care within resource-constrained settings.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias/organização & administração , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Global , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Lacunas da Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(1): 221-228, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778409

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Referral to Genetics for pre-testing counseling may be inefficient for women with ovarian cancer. This study assesses feasibility of gynecologic oncologists directly offering genetic testing. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted at two gynecologic oncology hubs in an integrated healthcare system from May 1 to November 6, 2019. Gynecologic oncologists offered multigene panel testing to women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, followed by selective genetic counseling. Outcomes were compared between study participants and women from other hubs in the health system. RESULTS: Of ovarian cancer patients at study sites, 40 participated and all underwent genetic testing. Of 101 patients diagnosed at other sites, 85% were referred to genetics (p = .0061 compared to pilot participants) and 67% completed testing (p < .0001). The time from diagnosis to blood draw and notification of result was 18.5 and 34 days for the pilot group compared to 25.5 and 53 days at other sites. Panel testing detected 9 (22.5%) and 7 (10.3%, p = .08) pathogenic mutations in each group, respectively. Patients and providers were highly satisfied with the streamlined process. CONCLUSION: Genetic testing performed at the gynecologic oncology point of care for patients with ovarian cancer is feasible, increases uptake of testing, and improves time to results.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Testes Imediatos/organização & administração , Idoso , California , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético/estatística & dados numéricos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia/métodos , Ginecologia/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Testes Imediatos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
17.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(10): 1079-1085, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609305

RESUMO

Importance: Up to 90% of patients treated with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) experience cutaneous toxic effects that are negatively associated with quality of life and lead to treatment interruptions. The Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab trial found reduced incidence of skin toxicity and quality of life impairment with preemptive use of doxycycline hyclate, topical corticosteroids, moisturizers, and sunscreen, demonstrating the benefit of prophylactic treatment for skin toxicity. Objective: To evaluate the association of a comprehensive skin toxicity program with adherence to prophylaxis guidelines for the prevention of EGFRi-associated cutaneous toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients receiving at least 1 dose of cetuximab at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in the calendar year 2012 (2 years after publication of the Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) or the calendar year 2017 (2 years after full implementation of the Skin Toxicities from Anticancer Therapies program). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rate of preemptive rash treatment and selection of preemptive agents. Secondary outcomes were incidence of rash, rates of rescue treatments, rates of cetuximab dose changes or interruptions, and overall survival at 2 years. Results: There were 118 patients (85 men; median age, 62.4 years [range, 23.5-91.7 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2012 and 90 patients (70 men; median age, 62.5 years [range, 30.7-90.5 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2017; 11 patients (9%) in 2012 and 31 patients (34%) in 2017 were treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute affiliate sites. At cetuximab treatment initiation, 29 patients (25%) in 2012 and 42 patients (47%) in 2017 were prophylactically treated for skin toxicity (P < .001). From 2012 to 2017, preemptive tetracycline use (13 of 29 [45%] to 30 of 42 [71%]; P = .02) and topical corticosteroid use (2 of 29 [7%] to 24 of 42 [57%]; P < .001) increased and topical antibiotic use (23 of 29 [79%] to 18 of 42 [43%]; P = .002) decreased. There was no significant difference in incidence of rash by prophylaxis status. Patients prescribed prophylactic treatment were 94% less likely to require a first rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16; P < .001), 74% less likely to require a second rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83; P = .02), and 79% less likely to experience a cetuximab dose change or interruption (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81; P = .02) than patients not prescribed prophylactic treatment, adjusting for treatment site and year. Conclusions and Relevance: Dermatologists can add value to oncology care by raising awareness of appropriate treatment options and increasing adherence to evidence-based prophylaxis protocols for EGFRi-associated rash, which is associated with decreased interventions and toxicity-associated chemotherapy interruptions.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Toxidermias/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer/normas , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Cetuximab/efeitos adversos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologia/organização & administração , Dermatologia/normas , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Toxidermias/etiologia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/normas , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(24): e20385, 2020 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541458

RESUMO

Template matching is a proposed approach for hospital benchmarking, which measures performance based on matching a subset of comparable patient hospitalizations from each hospital. We assessed the ability to create the required matched samples and thus the feasibility of template matching to benchmark hospital performance in a diverse healthcare system.Nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, 2017.Observational cohort study.We used administrative and clinical data from 668,592 hospitalizations at 134 VA hospitals in 2017. A standardized template of 300 hospitalizations was selected, and then 300 hospitalizations were matched to the template from each hospital.There was substantial case-mix variation across VA hospitals, which persisted after excluding small hospitals, hospitals with primarily psychiatric admissions, and hospitalizations for rare diagnoses. Median age ranged from 57 to 75 years across hospitals; percent surgical admissions ranged from 0.0% to 21.0%; percent of admissions through the emergency department, 0.1% to 98.7%; and percent Hispanic patients, 0.2% to 93.3%. Characteristics for which there was substantial variation across hospitals could not be balanced with any matching algorithm tested. Although most other variables could be balanced, we were unable to identify a matching algorithm that balanced more than ∼20 variables simultaneously.We were unable to identify a template matching approach that could balance hospitals on all measured characteristics potentially important to benchmarking. Given the magnitude of case-mix variation across VA hospitals, a single template is likely not feasible for general hospital benchmarking.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/métodos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Algoritmos , Benchmarking/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração
19.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 64: 72-79, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279024

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and smoking are highly associated with depression and hypoxia. There is limited knowledge about whether hypoxic conditions interact to cause depression. METHOD: A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse. Patients must have accessed any healthcare at a VA facility between 2004 and 2014 and had a negative depression screen (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) score ≤ 2). Patients with COPD or a positive depression screen (PHQ-2 score: 3+) during or prior to the year with a negative depression screen were excluded. Logistic regression with annual observations was used to evaluate depression incidence based on COPD and smoking status. Models were adjusted for demographics and other comorbid conditions. A probability scale was used to examine interactions between COPD and smoking. RESULTS: A total of 3,284,496 patients were included. Patients with COPD and current smokers were at increased risk for developing depression. There were minimal interaction effects between COPD and smoking. The odds of developing depression in a year varied from 1.4% among never smokers without COPD to 2.9.% among current smokers with COPD. CONCLUSION: Smoking and COPD are independent risk factors for depression and interact to cause depression. Further research is needed to confirm whether hypoxia contributes to this association.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente , Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Orthop Surg ; 12(2): 457-462, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167674

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of three different healthcare models (Traditional Model, Geriatric Consultant Model, and Orthogeriatric Unit Model) consecutively applied to a single academic center (University Hospital of Salamanca, Spain) for older hip fracture patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study, including 2741 hip fracture patients older than 64 years, admitted between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2014 to the University Hospital of Salamanca. Patients were divided into three groups according to the healthcare model applied. There were 983 patients on the Traditional Model, 945 patients on the Geriatric Consultant Model, and 813 patients on the Orthogeriatric Unit Model. We recorded age and gender of patients, functional status at admission (Barthel Index, Katz Index, and Physical Red Cross Scale), type of fracture, and intervention, and we analyzed the length of stay, time to surgery, post-surgical stay, and in-hospital mortality according to the healthcare model applied. RESULTS: Hip fractures are much more frequent in women, and an increase in the average age of patients was observed along with the study (P < 0.001). The most common type of fracture in the three models studied was an extracapsular fracture, for which the most common surgical procedure used was osteosynthesis. On the functional status of patients, there were no differences on the ambulatory ability previous to fracture, measured by the Physical Red Cross Scale, and the percentage of patients with a slight dependence determined by the Barthel Index (>60) was similar in both groups, but considering the Katz Index, the percentage of patients with a high degree of independence (A-B) was significantly higher for the group of patients treated on the Orthogeriatric Unit Model period (56%, P = 0.009). The Orthogeriatric Unit Model registered the greatest percentage of patients undergoing surgery (96.1%, P < 0.001) and the greatest number of early surgical procedures (<24 h) (24.8%, P < 0.001). The orthogeriatric unit model showed the shortest duration of stay (9 days median), decreasing by one day in respect of each of the other models studied (P < 0.001). Time to surgery was also significantly reduced with the Orthogeriatric Unit Model (median of 3 days, P < 0.001). With regard to in-hospital follow-up, there was a reduction in in-hospital mortality during the study period. We observed differences among the three healthcare models, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The healthcare model based on an Orthogeriatric Unit seems to be the most efficient, because it reaches a reduction in time to surgery, with an increased number of patients surgically treated on in the first 24 h, and the greatest frequency of surgically-treated patients.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA