Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models of Probenecid and Furosemide to Predict Transporter Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

PURPOSE: To provide whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of the potent clinical organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibitor probenecid and the clinical OAT victim drug furosemide for their application in transporter-based drug-drug interaction (DDI) modeling. METHODS: PBPK models of probenecid and furosemide were developed in PK-Sim®. Drug-dependent parameters and plasma concentration-time profiles following intravenous and oral probenecid and furosemide administration were gathered from literature and used for model development. For model evaluation, plasma concentration-time profiles, areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were predicted and compared to observed data. In addition, the models were applied to predict the outcome of clinical DDI studies. RESULTS: The developed models accurately describe the reported plasma concentrations of 27 clinical probenecid studies and of 42 studies using furosemide. Furthermore, application of these models to predict the probenecid-furosemide and probenecid-rifampicin DDIs demonstrates their good performance, with 6/7 of the predicted DDI AUC ratios and 4/5 of the predicted DDI Cmax ratios within 1.25-fold of the observed values, and all predicted DDI AUC and Cmax ratios within 2.0-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body PBPK models of probenecid and furosemide were built and evaluated, providing useful tools to support the investigation of transporter mediated DDIs.

Validation of a Drug Transporter Probe Cocktail Using the Prototypical Inhibitors Rifampin, Probenecid, Verapamil, and Cimetidine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A novel cocktail containing four substrates of key drug transporters was previously optimized to eliminate mutual drug-drug interactions between the probes digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate), furosemide (organic anion transporter 1/3), metformin (organic cation transporter 2, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K), and rosuvastatin (organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3, breast cancer resistance protein). This clinical trial investigated the effects of four commonly employed drug transporter inhibitors on cocktail drug pharmacokinetics. METHODS: In a randomized open-label crossover trial in 45 healthy male subjects, treatment groups received the cocktail with or without single oral doses of rifampin, verapamil, cimetidine or probenecid. Concentrations of the probe drugs in serial plasma samples and urine fractions were measured by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays to assess systemic exposure. RESULTS: The results were generally in accordance with known in vitro and/or clinical drug-drug interaction data. Single-dose rifampin increased rosuvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-tz) by 248% and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 1025%. Probenecid increased furosemide AUC0-tz by 172% and Cmax by 23%. Cimetidine reduced metformin renal clearance by 26%. The effect of single-dose verapamil on digoxin systemic exposure was less than expected from multiple-dose studies (AUC0-tz unaltered, Cmax + 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Taking all the interaction results together, the transporter cocktail is considered to be validated as a sensitive and specific tool for evaluating transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in drug development. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2017-001549-29.

Emodin-induced hepatotoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid through inhibiting UGTs and MRP2.

Aggravating effect of probenecid (a traditional anti-gout agent) on emodin-induced hepatotoxicity was evaluated in this study. 33.3% rats died in combination group, while no death was observed in rats treated with emodin alone or probenecid alone, indicating that emodin-induced (150 mg/kg) hepatotoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid (100 mg/kg). In toxicokinetics-toxicodynamics (TK-TD) study, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and systemic exposure (area under the serum concentration-time curve, AUC) of emodin and its glucuronide were significantly increased in rats after co-administrated with emodin and probenecid for 28 consecutive days. Results showed that the increased AUC (increased by 85.9%) of emodin was mainly caused by the decreased enzyme activity of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs, decreased by 11.8%-58.1%). In addition, AUC of emodin glucuronide was increased 5-fold, which was attributed to the decrease of multidrug-resistant-protein 2 (MRP2) protein levels (decreased by 54.4%). Similarly, in vitro experiments proved that probenecid reduced the cell viability of emodin-treated HepG2 cells through inhibiting UGT1A9, UGT2B7 and MRP2. Our findings demonstrated that emodin-induced hepatoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid through inhibition of UGTs and MRP2 in vivo and in vitro, indicating that gout patients should avoid taking emodin-containing preparations in combination with probenecid for a long time.

Phase I randomized clinical trial of N-acetylcysteine in combination with an adjuvant probenecid for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in children.

BACKGROUND: There are no therapies shown to improve outcome after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to verify brain exposure of the systemically administered antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the synergistic adjuvant probenecid, and identify adverse effects of this drug combination after severe TBI in children. METHODS: IRB-approved, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled Phase I study in children 2 to 18 years-of-age admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit after severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤8) requiring an externalized ventricular drain for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). Patients were recruited from November 2011-August 2013. Fourteen patients (n = 7/group) were randomly assigned after obtaining informed consent to receive probenecid (25 mg/kg load, then 10 mg/kg/dose q6h×11 doses) and NAC (140 mg/kg load, then 70 mg/kg/dose q4h×17 doses), or placebos via naso/orogastric tube. Serum and CSF samples were drawn pre-bolus and 1-96 h after randomization and drug concentrations were measured via UPLC-MS/MS. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was assessed at 3 months. RESULTS: There were no adverse events attributable to drug treatment. One patient in the placebo group was withdrawn due to adverse effects. In the treatment group, NAC concentrations ranged from 16,977.3±2,212.3 to 16,786.1±3,285.3 in serum and from 269.3±113.0 to 467.9±262.7 ng/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively; and probenecid concentrations ranged from 75.4.3±10.0 to 52.9±25.8 in serum and 5.4±1.0 to 4.6±2.1 µg/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively (mean±SEM). Temperature, mean arterial pressure, ICP, use of ICP-directed therapies, surveillance serum brain injury biomarkers, and GOS at 3 months were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment resulted in detectable concentrations of NAC and probenecid in CSF and was not associated with undesirable effects after TBI in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01322009.

Effect of gemfibrozil, rifampicin, or probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin is a potent, oral, selective inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: The goal of these studies was to investigate potential drug-drug interactions between empagliflozin and gemfibrozil (an organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 [OATP1B1]/1B3 and organic anion transporter 3 [OAT3] inhibitor), rifampicin (an OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor), or probenecid (an OAT3 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase inhibitor). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, crossover studies were undertaken in healthy subjects. In the first study, 18 subjects received the following in 1 of 2 randomized treatment sequences: a single dose of empagliflozin 25 mg alone and gemfibrozil 600 mg BID for 5 days with a single dose of empagliflozin 25 mg on the third day. In the second study, 18 subjects received a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg, a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg coadministered with a single dose of rifampicin 600 mg, and probenecid 500 mg BID for 4 days with a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg on the second day in 1 of 6 randomized treatment sequences. RESULTS: In the gemfibrozil study, 11 subjects were male, mean age was 35.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.47 kg/m(2). In the rifampicin/probenecid study, 10 subjects were male, mean age was 32.7 years and mean BMI was 23.03 kg/m(2). Exposure to empagliflozin was increased by coadministration with gemfibrozil (AUC0-∞: geometric mean ratio [GMR], 158.50% [90% CI, 151.77-165.53]; Cmax: GMR, 115.00% [90% CI, 106.15-124.59]), rifampicin (AUC0-∞: GMR, 135.20% [90% CI, 129.58-141.06]; Cmax: GMR, 175.14% [90% CI, 160.14-191.56]), and probenecid (AUC0-∞: GMR, 153.47% [90% CI, 146.41-160.88]; Cmax: GMR, 125.60% [90% CI, 113.67-138.78]). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in empagliflozin exposure were <2-fold, indicating that the inhibition of the OATP1B1/1B3, OAT3 transporter, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases did not have a clinically relevant effect on empagliflozin exposure. No dose adjustments of empagliflozin were necessary when it was coadministered with gemfibrozil, rifampicin, or probenecid. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01301742 and NCT01634100.

Pharmacokinetics of low-dose cidofovir in kidney transplant recipients with BK virus infection.

BACKGROUND: BK virus (BKV) infection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with progressive graft dysfunction and graft loss. Cidofovir, an antiviral agent with known nephrotoxicity, has been used in low doses to treat BKV infections. However, the systemic exposure and disposition of the low-dose cidofovir regimen are not known in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of low-dose cidofovir (0.24 - 0.62 mg/kg) both without and with oral probenecid in 9 transplant patients with persistent BK viremia without nephropathy in a crossover design. RESULTS: The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the study participants was 46.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range: 17-75 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ). The contribution of active renal secretion to cidofovir total body clearance was assessed by evaluating the effect of probenecid on cidofovir PK. Maximum cidofovir plasma concentrations, which averaged approximately 1 µg/mL, were significantly below the 36 µg/mL 50% effective concentration in vitro for cidofovir against BKV. The plasma concentration of cidofovir declined with an overall disposition half-life of 5.1 ± 3.5 and 5.3 ± 2.9 h in the absence and in the presence of probenecid, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cidofovir clearance and eGFR were linearly related irrespective of probenecid administration (r(2) = 0.8 without probenecid; r(2) = 0.7 with probenecid). This relationship allows for the prediction of systemic cidofovir exposure in individual patients and may be utilized to evaluate exposure-response relationships to optimize the cidofovir dosing regimen for BKV infection.

Combination of probenecid-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy.

The antifolate sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has been used in the intermittent prevention of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp). SP is an ideal choice for IPTp, however, as resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to SP increases, data are accumulating that SP may no longer provide benefit in areas of high-level resistance. Probenecid was initially used as an adjunctive therapy to increase the blood concentration of penicillin; it has since been used to augment concentrations of other drugs, including antifolates. The addition of probenecid has been shown to increase the treatment efficacy of SP against malaria, suggesting that the combination of probenecid plus SP may prolong the useful lifespan of SP as an effective agent for IPTp. Here, the literature on the pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions, interactions and available data on the use of these drugs in pregnancy is reviewed, and the possible utility of an SP-probenecid combination is discussed. This article concludes by calling for further research into this potentially useful combination.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between allopurinol and probenecid in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between probenecid and oxypurinol (the active metabolite of allopurinol) in patients with gout. METHODS: This was an open-label observational clinical study. Blood and urine samples were collected to measure oxypurinol and urate concentrations. We examined the effects of adding probenecid to allopurinol therapy upon plasma concentrations and renal clearances of urate and oxypurinol. RESULTS: Twenty patients taking allopurinol 100-400 mg daily completed the study. Maximum coadministered doses of probenecid were 250 mg/day (n = 1), 500 mg/day (n = 19), 1000 mg/day (n = 7), 1500 mg/day (n = 3), and 2000 mg/day (n = 1). All doses except the 250 mg daily dose were divided and dosing was twice daily. Estimated creatinine clearances ranged from 28 to 113 ml/min. Addition of probenecid 500 mg/day to allopurinol therapy decreased plasma urate concentrations by 25%, from mean 0.37 mmol/l (95% CI 0.33-0.41) to mean 0.28 mmol/l (95% CI 0.24-0.32) (p < 0.001); and increased renal urate clearance by 62%, from mean 6.0 ml/min (95% CI 4.5-7.5) to mean 9.6 ml/min (95% CI 6.9-12.3) (p < 0.001). Average steady-state plasma oxypurinol concentrations decreased by 26%, from mean 11.1 mg/l (95% CI 5.0-17.3) to mean 8.2 mg/l (95% CI 4.0-12.4) (p < 0.001); and renal oxypurinol clearance increased by 24%, from mean 12.7 ml/min (95% CI 9.6-15.8) to mean 16.1 ml/min (95% CI 12.0-20.2) (p < 0.05). The additional hypouricemic effect of probenecid 500 mg/day appeared to be lower in patients with renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of allopurinol with probenecid had a significantly greater hypouricemic effect than allopurinol alone despite an associated reduction of plasma oxypurinol concentrations. Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000276550.

[Drug-drug interactions and nephrotoxicity]. / Arzneimittelinteraktionen und Nephrotoxizität.

Nephrotoxicity is a common and often clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Mechanisms include vascular, tubulo-toxic, tubulo-obstructive, and immunological effects. Drug-drug interactions may occur at a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic level. Such interactions can both increase (cisplatin and aminoglycoside) but also protect from nephrotoxicity (cidofovir and probenecid).Important measures for preventing nephrotoxicity are (1) consideration of potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions when prescribing a drug, (2) prescription of nephrotoxic drugs for the shortest possible period, (3) detection of high-risk patients, and (4) consideration of hydration and prophylactic comedication.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of oseltamivir combined with probenecid.

Oseltamivir is an inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase, which is approved for use for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza A and B virus infections. In the event of an influenza pandemic, oseltamivir supplies may be limited; thus, alternative dosing strategies for oseltamivir prophylaxis should be explored. Healthy volunteers were randomized to a three-arm, open-label study and given 75 mg oral oseltamivir every 24 h (group 1), 75 mg oseltamivir every 48 h (q48h) combined with 500 mg probenecid four times a day (group 2), or 75 mg oseltamivir q48h combined with 500 mg probenecid twice a day (group 3) for 15 days. Pharmacokinetic data, obtained by noncompartmental methods, and safety data are reported. Forty-eight subjects completed the pharmacokinetic analysis. The study drugs were generally well tolerated, except for one case of reversible grade 4 thrombocytopenia in a subject in group 2. The calculated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios between groups 2 and 3 and group 1 were outside the bioequivalence criteria boundary (0.80 to 1.25) at 0.63 to 0.89 for group 2 versus group 1 and 0.57 to 0.90 for group 3 versus group 1. The steady-state apparent oral clearance of oseltamivir carboxylate was significantly less in groups 2 (7.4 liters/h; 90% CI, 6.08 to 8.71) and 3 (7.19 liters/h; 90% CI, 6.41 to 7.98) than in group 1 (9.75 liters/h; 90% CI, 6.91 to 12.60) (P < 0.05 for both comparisons by analysis of variance). The (arithmetic) mean concentration at 48 h for group 2 was not significantly different from the mean concentration at 24 h for group 1 (42 +/- 76 and 81 +/- 54 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.194), but the mean concentration at 48 h for group 3 was significantly less than the mean concentration at 24 h for group 1 (23 +/- 26 and 81 +/- 54 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.012). Alternate-day dosing of oseltamivir plus dosing with probenecid four times daily achieved trough oseltamivir carboxylate concentrations adequate for neuraminidase inhibition in vitro, and this combination should be studied further.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between allopurinol and probenecid in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Combination therapy with allopurinol and probenecid is used to treat tophaceous gout in patients who do not respond sufficiently to allopurinol alone. However, the potential interaction between these drugs has not been systematically investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and hypouricaemic effect of oxypurinol (the active metabolite of allopurinol) and probenecid when administered alone and in combination in healthy subjects. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover clinical trial was conducted in 12 healthy adults. Subjects were randomized to receive treatment for 7 days with allopurinol (150 mg twice daily), probenecid (500 mg twice daily) or combination therapy with both drugs, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Venous blood samples were collected predose (at 0 hours) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after dosage for determination of oxypurinol and/or probenecid concentrations. Plasma and urinary urate concentrations were determined on each study day and at the end of each washout period. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were analysed using two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Coadministration of allopurinol and probenecid significantly reduced average steady-state plasma oxypurinol concentrations (mean+/-SD: allopurinol alone 9.7+/-2.1 mg/L vs combination 5.1+/-1.0 mg/L, p<0.001). Probenecid concentrations were unaffected. Plasma urate concentrations decreased (p<0.01) during allopurinol therapy (0.16+/-0.05 mmol/L), probenecid therapy (0.13+/-0.02 mmol/L) and combination therapy (0.09+/-0.02 mmol/L) compared with baseline (0.30+/-0.05 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: Coadministration of allopurinol and probenecid to healthy subjects had a greater hypouricaemic effect than either allopurinol or probenecid alone, despite a reduction in plasma oxypurinol concentrations when the drugs were taken concomitantly.

MRP2 (ABCC2) transports taxanes and confers paclitaxel resistance and both processes are stimulated by probenecid.

ATP binding cassette (ABC) multidrug transporters such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) and BCRP (ABCG2) confer resistance against anticancer drugs and can limit their oral availability, thus contributing to failure of chemotherapy. Like P-gp and BCRP, another ABC transporter, MRP2 (ABCC2), is found in apical membranes of pharmacologically important epithelial barriers and in a variety of tumors. MRP2 transports several anticancer drugs and might thus have a similar impact on chemotherapy as P-gp and BCRP. We here show that human MRP2 transduced into epithelial MDCKII cells efficiently transported the taxane anticancer drugs paclitaxel and docetaxel and that this transport could be substantially stimulated with the drug probenecid, a representative of a range of MRP2-stimulating drugs. Transport of 2 previously identified MRP2 substrates, etoposide and vinblastine, was likewise stimulated by probenecid. MRP2 further conferred substantial resistance against paclitaxel toxicity, and this resistance was 2.7-fold stimulated by probenecid. Our data indicate that MRP2 function might affect chemotherapy with taxanes, potentially influencing both tumor resistance and taxane pharmacokinetics. Moreover, coadministration of probenecid and other MRP2-stimulating drugs might lead to unforeseen drug-drug interactions by stimulating MRP2 function, potentially leading to suboptimal levels of taxanes and other anticancer drugs in plasma and tumor.

Pharmacology of drugs for hyperuricemia. Mechanisms, kinetics and interactions.

The pharmacological profile of drugs for hyperuricemia is reviewed. These agents may reduce the amount of uric acid in blood by means of two different ways: (1) by reducing uric acid production through the inhibition of the enzyme xanthine oxidase (as allopurinol); (2) by increasing uric acid clearance through an inhibition of its renal tubular reabsorption (as probenecid), or through its metabolic conversion to a more soluble compound (as urate oxidase). Allopurinol is rapidly converted in the body to the active metabolite oxypurinol whose total body exposure may be 20-fold greater than that of the parent compound due to a much longer elimination half-life. Allopurinol undergoes several pharmacokinetic interactions with concomitant administered drugs, some of which may be potentially hazardous (especially with mercaptopurine and azathioprine). Probenecid is an uricosuric agent which undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism and whose elimination after high doses may become dose dependent. It may inhibit renal tubular secretion of several coadministered agents, including methotrexate and sulphonylureas. Rasburicase is a recombinant form of the enzyme urate oxidase which catalyzes the conversion of uric acid to the more soluble compound allantoin. Unlike allopurinol, it does not promote accumulation of hypoxanthine and xanthine in plasma, thus preventing the risk of xanthine nephropathy. Rasburicase showed no significant accumulation in children after administration of either 0.15 or 0.20 mg/kg/daily for 5 days. Rasburicase probably undergoes peptide hydrolysis and in in vitro studies was shown neither to inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 isoenzymes nor to interact with several drugs, so that no relevant interaction is expected during cotreatment in patients.

Bodipy-FL-verapamil: a fluorescent probe for the study of multidrug resistance proteins.

Most of the substances used as fluorescent probes to study drug transport and the effect of efflux blockers in multidrug resistant cells have many drawbacks, such as toxicity, unspecific background, accumulation in mitochondria. New fluorescent compounds, among which Bodipy-FL-verapamil (BV), have been therefore proposed as more useful tools. The uptake of BV has been evaluated by cytofluorimetry and fluorescence microscopy using cell lines that overexpress P-glycoprotein (P388/ADR and LLC-PK(1)/ADR) or MRP (multidrug resistance-related protein) (PANC-1) and clinical specimens from patients. The effect of specific inhibitors for P-glycoprotein (verapamil and vinblastine) or MRP (MK571 and probenecid) has been also studied. BV intracellular concentrations were significantly lower in the two P-glycoprotein overexpressing cell lines in comparison with the parental lines. In addition, verapamil and vinblastine increased the intracellular concentrations of the dye; MK571 and probenecid, two MRP inhibitors, increased BV levels in PANC-1 cells, that express this protein. These findings were confirmed in clinical specimens from patients. Fluorescence microscopy revealed a faint fluorescence emission in P-glycoprotein or MRP expressing cell lines; however, treatment with specific inhibitors significantly increased the fluorescence. BV is a useful tool for studying multidrug resistance proteins with different techniques such as cytofluorimetry and fluorescence microscopy, but does not discriminate between P-glycoprotein and MRP. In comparison with other classic fluorescent probes, the assay with this dye is extremely rapid, simple, not toxic for cells, devoid of fluorescent background, and can be useful in the clinical settings.

p-Aminohippurate transport at the apical membrane in the OK kidney epithelial cell line.

PURPOSE: We investigated the characteristics of transport of an organic anion, p-aminohippurate (PAH), at the apical membrane in a kidney epithelial cell line OK. METHODS: Efflux and uptake of [14C]PAH across the apical membrane were measured using OK cell monolayers grown on microporous membrane filters. RESULTS: PAH efflux to the apical side was greater than that to the basolateral side and significantly inhibited by probenecid. Diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), an inhibitor of potential-sensitive organic anion transport, significantly decreased PAH efflux to the apical side. Moreover, PAH efflux to the apical side was significantly decreased on incubation with high potassium buffer, as compared with control condition. Extracellular pH and Cl- had no effect on PAH efflux across the apical membrane. PAH uptake from the apical side was inhibited by various organic anions, and the inhibition patterns of PAH uptake from the apical and basolateral sides by various dicarboxylates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that PAH efflux to the apical side in OK cells was mediated by a potential-sensitive transport system, but not by an anion exchanger. Moreover, PAH uptake from the apical side was mediated by a specific transport system, which interacts with various organic anions and dicarboxylates.

Co-administration of probenecid, an inhibitor of a cMOAT/MRP-like plasma membrane ATPase, greatly enhanced the efficacy of a new 10-deazaaminopterin against human solid tumors in vivo.

Earlier studies from this laboratory have shown that the uricosuric agent probenecid (PBCD) will inhibit the extrusion of folate analogues from tumor cells mediated by a plasma membrane ATPase resembling the canicular multispecific organic anion transporter/multidrug resistance-related protein (MRP) family of ATP binding cassette transporters. This inhibition of this outwardly directed membrane ATPase has been shown to have a favorable impact upon the cellular pharmacokinetics, cytotoxicity, and efficacy of methotrexate in vivo. In an extension of these earlier studies, which had focused only on murine ascites tumors, we now report that parental co-administration of PBCD will also enhance net intracellular accumulation in vitro and intracellular persistence in vivo of a new folate analogue, 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin (PDX) in tumor cells. This resulted in marked enhancement of the efficacy of PDX against murine and human lung neoplasms and human prostate and mammary neoplasms growing as solid tumors in mice. As possible ATPases targeted by PBCD, all of these tumors expressed MRP-1, -4, and -7 genes, with expression of MRP-4 being greatest in each case. Four other MRP genes were expressed to a variable extent in some tumors but not others. The therapeutic enhancement of PDX by PBCD was manifested as tumor regression, where PDX alone was only growth inhibitory (A549 NSCL tumor), or as a substantial increase (3-4-fold) in overall regression and/or number of complete regressions (Lewis and LX-1 lung, PC-3 and TSU-PR1 prostate, and MX-1 mammary tumors) compared to PDX alone. Also, only in the case of PDX with PBCD, a significant number of mice transplanted with LX-1 or MX-1 tumors that experienced complete regression did not have regrowth of their tumor. In view of these results, clinical trials of this therapeutic modality appear to be warranted, especially in the case of new more efficacious folate analogues that are also permeants for this canicular multispecific organic anion transporter/MRP-like plasma membrane ATPase.

Probenecid pharmacokinetics in cystic fibrosis.

Probenecid pharmacokinetics were studied in 5 cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects and 5 control subjects at oral dosages of 5, 15, and 30 mg/kg. Serum and urine samples were collected for 8 h after administration and assayed by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by model-independent methods. All parameters were compared by 2-tailed analysis of variance with two major groupings: patient and dose. Both CF subjects and controls demonstrated dose-dependent kinetics, i.e., decreased elimination constant and decreased total body clearance with increasing dosage. The volume of distribution and time to peak were the only parameters that were not significantly dose dependent. At all dosages studied, we found no significant difference in total body clearance by CF subjects. Urinary recovery in an 8-hour period was not significantly different between CF subjects and controls nor was the percentage of dose recovered in the urine at each dosage level. Time to peak concentration varied widely between 0.5 and 4 h in both CF subjects and controls. We conclude, that CF patients have normal probenecid clearance, and that the standard dose for a CF patient is sufficient to attain a serum area under the curve equivalent to that of controls.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered dantrolene and its 5-hydroxy metabolite in dogs.

Dantrolene, a direct acting muscle relaxant used orally for spasticity, has appeared to be effective in the prevention and treatment of malignant hyperthermia in man and animals when administered intravenously. Its pharmacokinetics following intravenous administration have been studied in dogs. Concentrations of dantrolene and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Recovery of unchanged drug and reduced metabolites was negligible; of the hydroxy metabolite 2% was found in the urine and about 25% in the bile. The half-life of 5-hydroxydantrolene was shorter than that of the parent drug as demonstrated by administration of the metabolite. The apparent renal clearance of 5-hydroxydantrolene was independent of creatinine clearance, urine flow and pH, and appeared to be reduced in the presence of probenecid. Bile to plasma ratios of the hydroxy metabolite were high with biliary concentrations far exceeding the maximum solubility in water. The results of this pilot study indicate that hydroxylation is primarily responsible for the excretion of the dantrolene molecule from the body.