Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 143(2): 255-259, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29943821

RESUMO

Countries worldwide are increasingly expanding male/female binary sex classifications to recognize a third status. Intersex newborns may be included in this third category on birth certification. Parents, families, and communities require counselling and education to accommodate intersex newborns without stigma or discrimination. Whatever its biological or genetic origin, intersex status is a natural if relatively uncommon condition (one in 1500-2000 live births) that distinguishes sex from gender. The tendency of societies to recognize only male and female genders at birth has resulted in intersex children being subjected to invasive surgery and related, sometimes lifelong, medication to confirm them as male or female. On gaining maturity, some are severely distressed and resentful that early gender assignment was mistaken, particularly when excision of testes to enforce femininity or of ovaries to enforce masculinity has denied them procreative capacity. Emerging principles support postponement of such interventions until intersex individuals can make a gender choice for themselves.


Assuntos
Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/terapia , Identidade de Gênero , Criança , Aconselhamento , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/psicologia , Ética Médica , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/ética , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/legislação & jurisprudência
2.
Ann Ital Chir ; 85(2): 195-200, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24901311

RESUMO

AIM: Our exeperience with the reconstructive surgery of the adhesion of the glans with the preputial skin due to lichen sclerosus. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Twentyeight patients (mean age, 44 years; range, 28-69) underwent reshaping of the balanopreputial sulcus at our institution. All patients presented with trapped penis resulting from adhesion at the sulcus of glans due to Lichen Sclerosus. The procedure entailed separating the coronal adhesion along its entire length with the use of a blunttipped forceps, then reshaping the balanopreputial sulcus. Though simple, the maneuver is delicate and requires scrupulous attention to the ventral aspect to avoid damaging the urethra. The adhesion is removed circumferentially around the glans by means of electrobistoury. RESULTS: The duration of the follow-up period was 24 months. All patients stated they were satisfied with the cosmetic results and functional outcome. Recurrence of the condition occurred in 7% of the patients and was treated medically; recurrence of adhesion occurred in 2% of the patients and was treated with repeat surgery. DISCUSSION: The indication for medical therapy in early LS is a selective criterion restricted to less severe cases; otherwise, the physician may be held responsible for treatment failure, justified claims for reimbursement, disease progression and the decidedly greater damage that may ensue. Such consequences can be averted when assessment is based on recent scientific evidence and the approach to treatment is appropriate in terms of efficacy and effectiveness. Surgical management is definitive and restores normal penile anatomy and function, including sexual and urinary function, thus enabling the patient to regain sexual confidence CONCLUSIONS: Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus is a rare disease, however, its management is not devoid of medicolegal considerations. The etiopathogenesis of the disease is unknown but progression to carcinoma of the penis has been reported in untreated cases. Consequently, timely diagnosis holds medicolegal relevance for averting delayed initiation of treatment. In cases of balanopreputial adhesion with disappearance of the sulcus of glans, we proceed with lysis and reshaping of the sulcus by means of a simple technique we have developed. The technique involves separating the coronal adhesion circumferentially around the glans using a blunt-tipped forceps, then reshaping the balanopreputial sulcus. Though very simple, the procedure is also delicate as the surgeon must be careful not to damage the urethra beneath the ventral surface.


Assuntos
Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/cirurgia , Doenças do Pênis/cirurgia , Pênis/cirurgia , Fimose/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Eletrocirurgia/legislação & jurisprudência , Eletrocirurgia/métodos , Estética , Feminino , Humanos , Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Doenças do Pênis/complicações , Ereção Peniana , Fimose/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/legislação & jurisprudência , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Recidiva , Autocuidado , Micção , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA