Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 237
Filtrar
1.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 36(6): 439-443, 2024 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39361270

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The ideal graft material for the augmentation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has yet to be discovered. While synthetic mesh offers durable repairs this can be at the expense of mesh complications. Biologic grafts have been considered an alternative. This chapter reviews biologic graft materials as applied to POP surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The heterogeneity of available graft materials and definitions of success in POP literature make comparisons difficult. There may be utility in the augmentation of apical prolapse with autologous grafts. There is also modest evidence to support anterior wall augmentation with biologic grafts. However, a 2024 Cochrane review concluded there is not enough evidence to support routine use of grafts for transvaginal repairs. SUMMARY: Biologic grafts can be considered in certain cases. There continues to be a need for finding the ideal "graft-patient" combination. The field particularly needs more robust research in the recurrent POP patient population.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Telas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 184: 254-258, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696840

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The surgical training of gynecologic oncology (GO) fellows is critical to providing excellent care to women with gynecologic cancers. We sought to evaluate changes in techniques and surgical volumes over an 18-year period among established GO fellowships across the US. METHODS: We emailed surveys to 30 GO programs that had trained fellows for at least 18 years. Surveys requested the number of surgical cases performed by a fellow for seventeen surgical procedures over each of five-time intervals. A One-Way Analysis of Variance was conducted for each procedure, averaged across institutions, to examine whether each procedure significantly changed over the 18-year span. RESULTS: 14 GO programs responded and were included in the analysis using SPSS. We observed a significant increase in the use of minimally invasive (MIS) procedures (robotic hysterectomy (p < .001), MIS pelvic (p = .001) and MIS paraaortic lymphadenectomy (p = .008). There was a concurrent significant decrease in corresponding "open" procedures. There was a significant decrease in all paraaortic lymphadenectomies. Complex procedures (such as bowel resection) remained stable. However, there was a wide variation in the number of cases reported with extremely small numbers for some critical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of GO fellows has shifted toward increased use of MIS. While these trends in care are appropriate, they do not diminish the need in many patients for complex open procedures. These findings should help spur the development of innovative training to maintain the ability to provide these core, specialty-defining procedures safely.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Ginecologia , Oncologia , Humanos , Feminino , Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia/educação , Ginecologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Oncologia/educação , Oncologia/tendências , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Estados Unidos , Histerectomia/educação , Histerectomia/tendências , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(9): 753-757, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38624027

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Since transvaginal mesh (VM) kits for apical pelvic organ prolapse (APOP) were labeled "high-risk" in 2016 and subsequently banned in 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the most common remaining surgical options include abdominal mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy (AS) and transvaginal native tissue suspension (VN). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in APOP procedures for urologists and gynecologists. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2011 and 2020, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for AS, VM, and VN. RESULTS: There were 26,477 cases of APOP repair (32% AS, 6% VM, 62% VN) included, 9% by urologists. Urologists operated on older (65 vs 61 years) patients with more medical comorbidities. Urologists performed significantly higher proportion of AS (65% vs 29%) and VM (8% vs 6%) relative to VN (27% vs 65%) than gynecologists ( P < 0.0001). Transvaginal mesh utilization has decreased over time for both specialties ( P < 0.05); nonsignificant trends toward increasing AS ( P = 0.1646) in urologists and VN ( P = 0.0913) in gynecologists concurrently occurred. Significant independent predictors of the operating surgeon being a urologist were surgery being performed in the latter half of the cohort (2016-2020; odds ratio [OR], 1.22), non-White patient race (OR < 1 for all), a concomitant sling being placed (OR = 0.89), the surgery being VM (OR = 2.95) or AS (OR = 4.36), the patient being older (OR > 1 for each age range), and having a higher frailty index score (OR = 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in APOP repair choices exist between specialties. Urologists operate on older, more medically complex patients while demonstrating a strong preference for mesh-augmented compared with transvaginal native tissue repairs.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Telas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Feminino , Telas Cirúrgicas/tendências , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia/tendências , Vagina/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 23(2): 573-581, 2022 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225470

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate gynecologic oncologists' trends and attitudes towards the use of Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in active period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. METHODS: Online national survey sent to members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform consisting of six sections and 45 questions between the dates 1-15 June 2020 in Turkey to explore their surgical practice during the pandemic in three hospital types: Education and research hospital/university hospital, state hospital and private Hospital. Participants were gynecologic oncologists who are members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of participants canceled all operations except for cancer surgeries and emergent operations. About a quarter of participants (28%) continued to operate laparoscopically and/or robotically. For the evaluation of the suspected adnexial mass (SAM) 64% used laparotomy and only 13 % operated by laparoscopy (L/S). For the management of low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer only fifth of the participants preferred to perform L/S. For endometrial cancer with high-intermediate risk factors more than half of participants preferred complete staging with laparotomy. For advanced stage ovarian cancer, one-fifth of the participants preferred to perform an explorative laparotomy, whilst 15 % preferred diagnostic laparoscopy to triage the patients for either NACT or cytoreductive surgery. On the contrary 41 % of participants chose to have cytology by paracentesis for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecologic oncologists with >10 years L/S experience used MIS more for SAM. Furthermore, experienced surgeons used L/S more for endometrial cancer patients. In busy COVID hospitals, more participants preferred laparotomy over L/S. CONCLUSION: Use of MIS decreased during the pandemic in Turkey. More experienced surgeons continued to perform MIS. Surgical treatment was the preferred approach for SAM, early-stage endometrial cancer.  However, NACT was more popular compared to radical surgery.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19 , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Ginecologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/tendências , Laparotomia/métodos , Laparotomia/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas , Oncologia Cirúrgica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Turquia
5.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(1): 102255, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757223

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on changes in gynecologic surgical activity at Hospital Foch, Paris, France during the first French COVID lockdown in 2020. Additional goals include the evaluation the extent of the postponement suffered for each type of surgery and estimate the possible negative impact for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, chart-review cohort study in the gynecology department of Hospital Foch. Comparison of all patients scheduled, postponed and operated during the first COVID lockdown (March 14, to May 11, 2020) versus the same period in 2019. Postponed surgeries were classified into 4 scheduling interval categories according to the Society of Gynecology Oncology (SGO) recommendations: urgent (without delay), semi-urgent (1-4 weeks), non-urgent (>4-12 weeks) and elective (>3 months) and evaluated to determine whether COVID-19-related delays of surgeries fell within guidelines. The potential "loss of chance" or medical risk associated with postponed surgeries was estimated according to a composite criterion including death, aggravation of expected tumor stages/grades in cancers, increase in surgical complexity compared to that initially planned, need for preoperative transfusions, start of morphine consumption during preoperative treatment for opiate-naive patients, additional hospitalization or consultations in emergency room and delay in treatment when surgery was urgent. RESULTS: During the 2020 French COVID lockdown, 61 patients had a surgical procedure and 114 were postponed; in the comparator 2019 group, 232 patients underwent surgical procedures, indicating an overall decrease of 65% of activity. Analysis of differences between the two years revealed a reduction of 64% in emergency procedures, 90% of functional pathologies, and 13% of cancers. According to SGO guidelines, the only type of surgical procedures that had excessive delay was the semi-urgent group, where time to surgery was 6.7 weeks [range 5.4-10 weeks] instead of the recommended interval of 1-4 weeks. Among postponed surgeries there were 10 patients (8.7%) with a potential "loss of chance" according to the composite criteria, all included in the semi-urgent group. CONCLUSION: The COVID 19 pandemic was responsible for a significant decrease of activity in the surgical department of Hospital Foch. Difficulty of rescheduling surgeries was responsible for an increased delay in semi-urgent operations. In almost 9% of postponed surgeries, there was a potential "loss of chance", which likely represents only the tip of iceberg of collateral damages due to COVID 19 pandemic in this surgical unit. These data show the importance of continuing to treat pathologies requiring urgent or semi-urgent surgery during pandemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Departamentos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paris , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(5): 738-746, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34619737

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utilization of minimally invasive adnexal surgery, including ovarian cystectomy and oophorectomy, among women with benign gynecologic diseases and compare the associated morbidity and mortality of minimally invasive and open surgery. METHODS: Women with benign ovarian pathology who underwent an ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy from 2016 through 2018 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases were included. Patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy or concurrent hysterectomy were excluded. Population-level weighted estimates were developed, and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and hospital charges were examined based on surgical approach for each procedure. RESULTS: The cohort included 351,207 women who underwent oophorectomy and 220,893 women who underwent cystectomy, when weighted representing 547,836 and 328,408 patients, respectively, nationwide. A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 294,190 (89.6%) patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy, and in 478,402 (87.3%) of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Use of minimally invasive surgery for cystectomy increased from 88.7% in 2016 to 91.0% in 2018, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery for oophorectomy increased from 85.8% to 88.7% over the same time period (P<.001 for both). The complication rates for ovarian cystectomy were 2.7% for minimally invasive surgery and 8.8% for laparotomy (P<.001); for oophorectomy the complication rate was 3.1% for minimally invasive surgery and 22.9% for laparotomy (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery is used in the majority of women who are undergoing oophorectomy and ovarian cystectomy for benign indications. Compared with laparotomy, minimally invasive surgery is associated with fewer complications.


Assuntos
Cistos/cirurgia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Ovariectomia/tendências , Ovário/cirurgia , Doenças dos Anexos/mortalidade , Doenças dos Anexos/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Gynecol Oncol ; 163(3): 552-556, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, complications, and trends associated with ureteral surgeries on a gynecologic oncology service in the context of a fellowship training program over a 24-year period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of ureteral surgeries by gynecologic oncologists at either Moffitt Cancer Center or Tampa General Hospital from 1997 to 2020. Patient characteristics, predisposing factors, location and type of injury, repair method, postoperative management and complications were abstracted from the medical record. The recent cohort (2005-2020) was compared to our prior series (1997-2004). RESULTS: Eighty-eight cases were included. The average number of ureteral surgeries per year decreased from 5.75 (1997-2004) to 2.63 (2005-2020). Of 46 iatrogenic injuries, 45 were recognized and repaired intraoperatively. Ureteral transection was the most common type (85% [39 of 46]) and the distal 5 cm was the most common location of injury (63% [29 of 46]). Ureteroneocystostomy was the most common method of repair (83% [73 of 88]). Postoperative management, including stenting and imaging, has not changed significantly. Length of urinary catheter usage decreased in the recent cohort without associated complications. Five patients had major postoperative complications and 4 involved the urinary tract. Of those with follow-up, 96% (66 of 69) of ureteroneocystostomies and 75% (9 of 12) of ureteroureterostomies had radiologically normal urinary tracts. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral surgery is necessary in the case of injury or involvement with invasive disease. There has been a decrease in number of procedures. Ureteroneocystostomy has remained the most common method of reconstruction for both injury and resection with acceptable postoperative complication rates.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Ureter/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Cistostomia/métodos , Cistostomia/tendências , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ureter/lesões , Ureterostomia/métodos , Ureterostomia/tendências
9.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(10): 102206, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391952

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF), based on the best currently available evidence, for the prophylactic procedures associated with gynecological surgery for benign disease such as superficial endometriosis lesions and adhesions. METHODS: The CNGOF has decided to adopt the AGREE II and GRADE systems for grading scientific evidence. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade that reflects the quality of evidence (QE) (clinical practice guidelines). RESULTS: Endometriosis and pelvic pain Superficial endometriosis can be entirely asymptomatic. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic superficial peritoneal endometriosis is not recommended in women of childbearing age for the prevention of pelvic pain, especially in case of proximity to noble organs (e.g., the ureters, rectum and sigmoid, and ovaries in nulligravida) as there is no evidence that the disease will progress to become symptomatic (low level of evidence). In case of accidental discovery of superficial endometriosis in women of childbearing age with pelvic pain, it is recommended that the lesions are excised, if surgically accessible. Removal of superficial endometriosis lesions in patients with painful symptoms improves quality of life and pain (low level of evidence). Endometriosis and infertility It appears that women with isolated superficial endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy with histological confirmation have a significantly higher incidence of primary infertility than patients without endometriosis. However, there is no data regarding the impact of treatment of these lesions on the fertility in these women or on the natural course of their disease (low level of evidence). It is recommended that excision is performed rather than monopolar coagulation of superficial endometriosis lesions in infertile women, as this results in a higher spontaneous pregnancy rate (low level of evidence). Adhesions and pelvic pain There is limited data in the literature regarding the benefit of performing systematic adhesiolysis during laparoscopy to prevent pelvic pain when incidental pelvic adhesions are discovered. For patients with pelvic pain, it is probably better not to perform adhesiolysis to prevent pelvic pain, although this can be decided on a case-by-case basis depending on the extent of the adhesions, the topography, and the type of surgery considered (low level of evidence). For asymptomatic patients, it is recommended not to perform adhesiolysis to prevent pelvic pain due to the lack of clear efficacy both short- or long-term and due to the increased risk of surgical injuries (low level of evidence). Adhesions and infertility There is limited data in the literature regarding the potential benefit of performing systematic adhesiolysis when there is an incidental discovery of pelvic adhesions during laparoscopy to prevent infertility. For infertile women, in the event of fortuitous discovery of adhesions at laparoscopy, it is probably better not to perform complex adhesiolysis. Only adhesiolysis of tubo-ovarian adhesions that are minimal or slight in terms of their extension and/or their nature may be useful to improve the chances of spontaneous pregnancy. However, it remains to be decided on a case-by-case basis depending on other potential causes of infertility (low level of evidence). For women without known infertility issues, it is probably better not to perform systematic adhesiolysis in order to improve their pregnancy chances, considering the balance between the unknown benefit and the risks of complications inherent to surgery (low level of evidence). CONCLUSION: Further investigations are needed in order to increase the quality of management regarding associated interventions such as the treatment of superficial endometriosis or adhesions performed during a gynecologic surgical procedure and, thereby, bolster these recommendations.


Assuntos
Endometriose/cirurgia , Guias como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Endometriose/complicações , Feminino , França , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Ginecologia/métodos , Ginecologia/organização & administração , Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Gravidez , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia
10.
Anesth Analg ; 132(6): 1692-1699, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651572

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the associations of preoperative sarcopenia (muscle mass depletion) and myosteatosis (muscle quality attenuation) with the incidence of postinduction hypotension (PIH) and postoperative complications among patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery. METHODS: Based on a previous prospective surgical registry of gynecologic patients, we included patients with an available preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan performed within 3 months before surgery. The cross-sectional muscle mass and density at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level were measured from the CT scan. The primary outcome was PIH, which was defined as a blood pressure reduction >30% from baseline. The secondary outcome was postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the associations between the muscle parameters and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 167 gynecologic surgical patients included in this study, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 53.0 (12.2) years. Sarcopenia was present in 86 (51.5%) patients. Fifty-six (33.5%) patients experienced PIH, and 89 (53.3%) patients experienced different degrees of postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis showed that myosteatosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of PIH (odds ratio [OR] = 2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-7.04; P = .015), and sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (OR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.16-4.57; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Muscle assessments using preoperative CT scans may help identify high-risk patients and determine perioperative management strategies among gynecologic patients.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Doenças Musculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Musculares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Musculares/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Sarcopenia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(1): e23995, 2021 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33429761

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The Chinese government is attaching great importance to the development of ambulatory surgery in order to optimize the healthcare system in China. The study aims to examine the complications and quality indicators of patients who underwent gynecological ambulatory surgery at a tertiary hospital in China.This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent ambulatory surgery between July and September 2019 at the Department of Gynecology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. The patients were followed by phone at 30 days after discharge. The postoperative complications, mortality, unplanned re-operation, delayed discharge, unplanned re-hospitalization, and patient satisfaction were collected. The patients who underwent conventional hysteroscopic resection of uterine lesions during the same period were collected as controls for the economics analysis.A total of 392 patients who underwent ambulatory gynecological surgery were included. Fifteen patients had postoperative complications, and the total complication rate was 3.8% (15/392). Eight (8/392, 2.0%) patients had delayed discharge. There were no unplanned re-operations and deaths. There were two (2/392, 0.5%) cases of unplanned re-hospitalization. At 30 days after discharge, two patients were dissatisfied, and 390 cases were satisfied, for an overall satisfaction rate of 99.5%. Compared with conventional hysteroscopic resection of uterine lesions, ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery had a shorter hospital stay and lower total costs (P < .05) but similar surgery-related costs.Ambulatory gynecological surgery is feasible in China, with an acceptable complication profile and obvious economic and social benefits. Nevertheless, hospital management shall be reinforced.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , China/epidemiologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Fertil Steril ; 115(2): 406-415, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33039131

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study reproductive outcomes, and pregnancy and delivery complications after conservative or operative treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis during long-term follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Women with rectovaginal endometriosis referred to hospital due to any indication from 2004 to 2013 (N = 543) who were treated initially either conservatively (group CONS, n = 183), or operatively (OPER, n = 360) either with resection of rectovaginal nodule (RVR, n = 192) or with concomitant bowel resection (BR, n = 132). INTERVENTION(S): Conservative or operative management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, and assessment of the complications during pregnancy and delivery. RESULTS(S): Between women in the CONS group or OPER group, no differences were found in either clinical pregnancy rate (56%, n = 102 vs. 50%, n = 181) or live-birth rate (48%, n = 87 vs. 42%, n = 153). Of the pregnancies, 64% (n = 65) and 49% (n = 89), respectively, started after medically assisted reproduction. No differences emerge in the subanalysis of women <40 years-old who wished to conceive. The most common pregnancy complication was preterm birth: 15% (n = 13) in the CONS group and 20% (n = 30) in the OPER group. The cesarean delivery rate also was high (46%, n = 40 vs. 49%, n = 76). Complications emerged in 21% (n = 10) versus 29% (n = 23) of vaginal deliveries and 45% (n = 18) versus 53% (n = 40) of cesarean deliveries. The most common delivery complication was excessive bleeding. The follow-up period was 4.9 years in the CONS group and 5.6 years in the OPER group. CONCLUSION(S): Women with rectovaginal endometriosis have comparable and good reproductive prognosis regardless of the treatment method.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Endometriose/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Reto/patologia , Vagina/patologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Tratamento Conservador/tendências , Endometriose/diagnóstico , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez/tendências , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vagina/cirurgia
14.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(2): 259-268, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32439413

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To present updated information regarding compensation patterns for Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS)-graduated physicians in the United States beginning practice during the last 10 years, focusing on the variables that have an impact on differences in salary, including gender, fellowship duration, geographic region, practice setting, and practice mix. DESIGN: An online survey was sent to FMIGS graduates between March 15, 2019 and April 12, 2019. Information on physicians' demographics, compensation (on the basis of location, practice model, productivity benchmarks, academic rank, and years in practice), and attitudes toward fairness in compensation was collected. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: FMIGS graduates practicing in the United States. INTERVENTION: E-mail survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We surveyed 298 US FMIGS surgeons who had graduated during the last 10 years (2009-2018). The response rate was 48.7%. Most of the respondents were women (69%). Most of the graduates (84.8%) completed 2- or 3-year fellowship programs. After adjustment for inflation, the median starting salary for the first postfellowship job was $252 074 ($223 986-$279 983) (Table 1). The median time spent in the first job was 2.6 years, and the median total salary at the current year rose to $278 379.4 ($241 437-$350 976). The median salary for respondents entering a second postfellowship job started at $280 945 ($261 409-$329 603). Significantly lower compensation was reported for female FMIGS graduates in their initial postfellowship jobs and was consistently lower than for that of men over time. Most FMIGS graduates (59.7%) reported feeling inadequately compensated for their level of specialization. CONCLUSION: A trend toward higher self-reported salaries is noted for FMIGS graduates in recent years, with significant differences in compensation between men and women. Among obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists, FMIGS graduates earn significantly less than other fellowship-trained physicians, with median salaries that are lower than those of generalist obstetrics and gynecology physicians.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Ginecologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Adulto , Bolsas de Estudo/economia , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/educação , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Obstetrícia/economia , Obstetrícia/educação , Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia/tendências , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Cirurgiões/economia , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Urology ; 150: 188-193, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32439552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of surgical repair of comorbid rectal prolapse (RP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) over time in a large population-based cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried Optum, a national administrative claims database, from 2003 to 2017. We evaluated female patients age 18 or older with a diagnosis of POP and/or RP. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and rates of procedures were collected. RESULTS: We identified 481,051 women diagnosed with RP and/or POP. Only 2.0% of women in the cohort had comorbid POP and RP. While 29.9% of women with RP had dual prolapse, only 2.1% of women with POP had both diagnoses. Overall, 25.8% of women had one or more surgical repairs. Surgical repairs were done in 26.0% of women with POP, 15.0% of women with RP, and 48.2% of women with comorbid POP/RP, though only 19.8% of patients with dual diagnoses had both RP and POP repairs. Over the study period, the rate of multidisciplinary surgical repairs increased by 2.7-fold. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of comorbid RP and POP among women in our cohort is low (2.0%). Rates of multidisciplinary surgery have increased possibly due to the increased use of imaging, laparoscopic surgery, and awareness of the shared pathophysiology of the disease.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Laparoscopia/tendências , Prolapso Retal/epidemiologia , Prolapso Uterino/epidemiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prolapso Retal/diagnóstico , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/diagnóstico , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Vagina/diagnóstico por imagem , Vagina/cirurgia
16.
J Robot Surg ; 15(2): 215-219, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452011

RESUMO

Robotic-assisted surgery has a shorter learning curve enabling the surgeons to do complex surgeries in a minimally invasive way. This study analyzed how the time taken for robotic-assisted procedures in gynecology and gynecologic oncology has changed over the years in a university teaching institution. Details were taken from a prospectively maintained electronic database after obtaining permission from the hospital ethics committee. All patients who underwent robotic surgery for gynecologic problems at this center from February 2015 till December 2019 were included. The clinical, perioperative, postoperative and pathologic details were collected from the prospectively maintained database. To analyze quantitative data, student t test was used. Chi-square test was performed to compare categorical variables. 655 patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery during this period. The majority of the patients underwent surgery for uterine cancer (49%). There was a significant improvement in total surgical time (250 vs. 165 min), docking time (12.6 vs 8.9 min), and console time (130 vs. 95 min) between the first and second year (2015-16). The next 2 years (2017 and 18) did not show a significant decrease in the total surgery time and console time, but docking times improved in 2017 (5.5 vs 8.5 min) compared to 2016. In 2019, there was a significant improvement in all surgical times compared to previous years. This study shows that robotic surgery has a lot of scope for improvement in surgical performance beyond its first and second years. The surgical performance as seen from the improved surgical times keeps on improving even after many years.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Duração da Cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
17.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(3): 502-512, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348011

RESUMO

Uterine transplantation is an evolving procedure to allow for childbearing in paitents with absolute uterine factor infertility. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature using a comprehensive PubMed literature search. A systematic medical subheadings search strategy was used with the terms "uterus transplant" and "uterine transplantation". Of the 75 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 68 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis on living donor uterine transplant, 5 on deceased donor uterine transplant, and 6 case reports of single uterine transplants. In conclusion, uterus transplant is a nascent field undergoing a rapid rate of evolution as programs mature their data and increase the number of procedures performed. The most recent publications and advances are thus summarized in this article to capture the most up-to-date information.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Útero/transplante , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico , Doadores de Tecidos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(5): 908-911, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Wireless signal transduction is the future in the field of laparoscopic surgery. Cable-free endoscopic equipment would be the ideal surgical instrument for every laparoscopic surgeon. INSTRUMENT: Our department has developed a new cable-free laparoscopic setup that couples a rigid 0°, 10-mm laparoscope with a wireless camera modified with a special adapter. We used a portable and rechargeable LED cold light source. The signal was wirelessly transmitted from the camera to a tablet computer using the corresponding mobile application. EXPERIENCE: Our team has used this setup in 14 laparoscopic operations with excellent results. Two cases performed exclusively with the new setup are presented in the videos. The image quality obtained was comparable with the conventional laparoscopic setup, and the operations performed were unaffected. CONCLUSION: This report presents the use of a wireless camera throughout the course of a laparoscopic surgery, and the results are promising. The new systems' favorable characteristics, such as wireless signal transmission, cost, flexibility, and size, support this as a feasible new technique for performing laparoscopic surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Laparoscópios/tendências , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Tecnologia sem Fio/tendências , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/tendências
19.
Br J Cancer ; 123(10): 1471-1473, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32830203

RESUMO

Ovarian cancer surgery endeavours to remove all visible tumour deposits, and surgical technologies could potentially facilitate this aim. However, there appear to be barriers around the adoption of new technologies, and we hope this article provokes discussion within the specialty to encourage a forward-thinking approach to new-age surgical gynaecological oncology.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Oncologia/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/epidemiologia , Terapia Combinada/história , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/tendências , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Preservação da Fertilidade/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/história , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Invenções/tendências , Oncologia/história , Oncologia/tendências , Morbidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/história , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/história , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências , Terapias em Estudo/instrumentação , Terapias em Estudo/métodos , Terapias em Estudo/psicologia , Terapias em Estudo/tendências
20.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(4): 542-547, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694091

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical and other procedures to alter the shape of the female external genitalia, especially the labia minora, are increasingly popular and controversial worldwide. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to delineate and complicate the medical and moral controversy around these vulvoplasty procedures, by describing how female genital aesthetics, their interpretation, and alteration vary over time, space, and culture. METHODS: The history of the Hottentot Venus is used as a pivot about which to consider current biomedical, anthropological, and ethical literatures regarding female genital appearance and its manipulation. Intersectionality describes how different systems influence each other to affect the agency of certain individuals or groups, and is therefore an ideal analytic method for biopsychosocial concerns of sex and informed consent. RESULTS: The 19th century anatomic study and display of Sarah "Saartjie" Baartman, the Hottentot Venus, defined a European vulvar ideal by demonstrating its opposite. Today, the ideal appearance of the labia minora is variable across cultures and nationalities, and various mechanical and surgical manipulations are sought or imposed upon women to bring their bodies into conformity with these ideals. CONCLUSION: For European audiences, Baartman exemplified a stereotypical association between genital appearance, sexual availability, and accessibility as a biomedical subject. These logical linkages were a by-product of sexist, racist, and colonial ideologies that have since fallen out of favor. However, their genital effects continue to influence bioethical considerations of genitoplasty into the present day. Chubak B. Historical and Ethical Perspectives on Vulvoplasty. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:542-547.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal , Características Culturais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/ética , Internacionalidade , Vulva/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/história , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Humanos , Vulva/anatomia & histologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA