Liliequist membrane: A systematic review of history, anatomy, clinical importance, and surgical challenges.

BACKGROUND: The Liliequist membrane (LM) represents a crucial yet challenging anatomical structure in neuroanatomy. First observed in 1875 and later elucidated by Bengt Liliequist in 1956, the LM's precise anatomical description and boundaries remain complex. Its significance extends to neurosurgery, impacting various procedures like endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomies, aneurysm and tumor surgeries, treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts, and managing perimesencephalic hemorrhages. However, a comprehensive understanding of the LM is hindered by inconsistent anatomical descriptions and limitations in available literature, warranting a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining to Liliequist's membrane. The search employed Mesh terms like "Liliequist membrane," "Liliequist's diaphragm," and related variations. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies exploring the historical evolution, anatomical structure, radiological characteristics, and clinical implications of the LM in neurosurgery. RESULTS: The search yielded 358 articles, with 276 unique articles screened based on relevance. Following a meticulous screening process, 72 articles underwent full-text assessment, resulting in the inclusion of 5 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. The selected studies varied in methodology, including anatomical dissections, radiological evaluations, and clinical significance in neurosurgical procedures. Insights were derived on LM's anatomical variations, radiological visualization, and its critical role in guiding neurosurgical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advancements in understanding its clinical significance and radiological visualization, challenges persist in precisely delineating its boundaries. Further research, especially on embryological development and histological characterization, is essential. Enhancing comprehension of LM-related pathologies is crucial for accurate preoperative planning and optimizing patient outcomes in neurosurgery.

Prominent Neurosurgery Books of the Western World: How They Defined the Era of Modern Neurosurgery in the 19th Century.

The aim of this article is to introduce the 19th century neurosurgery books to reveal their contributions to modern neurosurgery. Methods In this study, 29 books were accessed, and reviewed, and the resources from the late 18th century and early 20th century were included. However, neurology or general surgery books that included neurosurgical subjects or chapter were excluded unless there were revolutionary ideas in their relevant chapters. The books of this period observed to have some common differences from the books that were written in the previous century. Parallel to the concept of cerebral localization, which started to develop in this period, neurosurgery evolved from skull surgery to brain surgery. Due to the advancements in patient care, anesthesia and sterile techniques, surgical medical branches showed rapid development in the 1800s. During this period, cerebral localization concept changed the comprehension and approach in neurosurgery and opened the gate of a new era in the field of neurological surgery unlike other branches and helped to establish modern neurosurgery. 19th century surgeons became able to operate on more complex cases with more advanced techniques. Knowledge of published pioneer papers and books help understanding of emergence of neurological surgery as a separate discipline.

An In-Depth Analysis of the Artery of Salmon: Anatomy and Neurosurgical Implications.

BACKGROUND: Michel Salmon was a prominent person in the field of plastic surgery during the early 20th century. His pioneering work contributed significantly to our understanding of human anatomy, particularly with the identification of the artery of Salmon (AOS). The objective of this study is to thoroughly investigate the AOS by conducting a comprehensive literature review, providing insights into its anatomy and surgical implications. METHODS: This review was undertaken after a thorough examination of literature encompassing papers about the AOS. Right up until January 2024, databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science were explored. The search was conducted using specific terms such as "Artery of Salmon," "suboccipital artery," and "vertebral artery anatomy." An in-depth assessment was conducted to examine the anatomy, and surgical significance of the AOS. RESULTS: The AOS is a branch of the V3 segment of the vertebral artery that supplies the suboccipital muscles. The ability, to identify it, is critical for distinguishing the origins of intraoperative hemorrhage. Through careful surgical intervention, the artery was able to devascularize tumors and vascular lesions. We also touched on the technical issues of its possible application in bypass operations for aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery or vertebral artery. CONCLUSIONS: The AOS is sometimes vital in neurosurgery, facilitating precise interventions and serving as a conduit in suboccipital bypass surgeries. Understanding its variations is essential for neurosurgeons, showcasing ongoing advancements in patient care.

The birth of modern military neurosurgery through the eyes of Harvey Cushing's war memoir From a Surgeon's Journal, 1915-1918.

Dr. Harvey Cushing is considered the father of modern neurological surgery, and his role and efforts in World War I continue to have a lasting effect on today's practice of neurosurgery. During World War I, he embodied the tenets of a neurosurgeon-scientist: he created and implemented novel antiseptic techniques to decrease infection rates after craniotomies, leading him often to be referred to as "originator of brain wound care." His contributions did not come without struggles, however. He faced criticism for numerous military censorship violations, and he developed a severe peripheral neuropathy during the war. However, he continued to stress the importance of patient care and his surgical prowess was evident. In this paper, the authors summarize Cushing's notes published in From a Surgeon's Journal, 1915-1918 and discuss the impact of his experiences on his own practice and the field of neurosurgery.

Childhood-onset Craniopharyngioma.

Craniopharyngiomas are rare embryonic malformational tumors of the sellar/parasellar region, classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as tumors with low-grade malignancy (WHO I). The childhood adamantinomatous subtype of craniopharyngioma is usually cystic with calcified areas. At the time of diagnosis, hypothalamic/pituitary deficits, visual disturbances, and increased intracranial pressure are major symptoms. The treatment of choice in case of favorable tumor location (without hypothalamic involvement) is complete resection. It is important to ensure that optical and hypothalamic functionality are preserved. In case of unfavorable tumor location, that is with hypothalamic involvement, a hypothalamus-sparing surgical strategy with subsequent local irradiation of residual tumor is recommended. In the further course of the disease, recurrences and progression often occur. Nevertheless, overall survival rates are high at 92%. Severe impairment of quality of life and comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, hypothalamic obesity, and neurological consequences can be observed in patients with disease- and/or treatment-related lesions of hypothalamic structures. Childhood-onset craniopharyngioma frequently manifests as a chronic disease so that patients require lifelong, continuous care by experienced multidisciplinary teams to manage clinical and quality of life consequences. For this review, a search for original articles and reviews published between 1986 and 2020 was performed in Pubmed, Science Citation Index Expanded, EMBASE, and Scopus. The search terms used were "craniopharyngioma, hypothalamus, pituitary obesity, irradiation, neurosurgery.

Minimally-invasive tubular retraction ports for intracranial neurosurgery: History and future perspectives.

Brain retraction is a necessary yet potentially damaging requirement of accessing lesions located in deep structures. The development of minimally-invasive tubular retractors (MITRs) provides the theoretical advantage of maximizing visualization of and access to deep-seated lesions, all while minimizing collateral tissue damage. These advantages make MITRs preferable to traditional bladed retractors in the majority of deep-seated lesions. Several commercially-available MITR systems currently exist and have been shown to aid in achieving excellent outcomes with acceptable safety profiles. Nevertheless, important drawbacks to currently-available MITR systems exist. Continued pursuit of an ideal MITR system that provides maximal visualization and access to deep-seated lesions while minimizing retraction-related tissue damage is therefore important. In this review, we discuss the historical development of MITRs, the advantages of MITRs compared to traditional bladed retractors, and opportunities to improve the development of prospective MITRs.

The History of Neurosurgical Spinal Oncology: From Inception to Modern-Day Practices.

The neurosurgical management of spinal neoplasms has undergone immense development in parallel with advancements made in general spine surgery. Laminectomies were performed as the first surgical procedures used to treat spinal neoplasms. Since then, neurosurgical spinal oncology has started to incorporate techniques that have developed from recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurgery has also integrated radiotherapy into the treatment of spine tumors. In this historical vignette, we present a vast timeline spanning from the Byzantine period to the current day and recount the major advancements in the management of spinal neoplasms.

The evolution of stereotactic radiosurgery in neurosurgical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was born in an attempt to treat complex intracranial pathologies in a fashion whereby open surgery would create unnecessary or excessive risk. To create this innovation, it was necessary to harness advances in other fields such as engineering, physics, radiology, and computer science. METHODS: We review the history of SRS to provide context to today's current state, as well as guide future advancement in the field. RESULTS: Since time of Lars Leksell, the young Swedish neurosurgeon who pioneered the development of the SRS, the collegial and essential partnership between neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and physicists has given rise to radiosurgery as a prominent and successful tool in neurosurgical practice. CONCLUSION: We examine how neurosurgeons have helped foster the SRS evolution and how this evolution has impacted neurosurgical practice as well as that of radiation oncology and neuro-oncology.

Historical Perspective on Surgery and Survival with Glioblastoma: How Far Have We Come?

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme remains a therapeutic challenge. We offer a historical review of the outcomes of patients with glioblastoma from the earliest report of surgery for this lesion through the introduction of modern chemotherapeutics and aggressive approaches to tumor resection. METHODS: We reviewed all major surgical series of patients with glioblastoma from the introduction of craniotomy for glioma (1884) to 2020. RESULTS: The earliest reported craniotomy for glioblastoma resulted in the patient's death less than a month after surgery. Improved intracranial pressure management resulted in improved outcomes, reducing early postoperative mortality from 50% to 6% in Harvey Cushing's series. In the first major surgical series (1912), the mean survival was 10.1 months. This figure did not improve until the introduction of radiotherapy in the 1950s, which doubled survival relative to those who had surgery alone. The most recent significant advance, chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide, extended survival by 2.5 months compared with surgery and radiotherapy alone (14.6 and 12.1 months, respectively). This protocol remains the standard regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The innovative treatments being investigated have yet to show a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: With advancements in localization, imaging, anesthesia, surgical technique, control of cerebral edema, and adjuvant therapies, outcomes in glioblastoma improved incrementally from Cushing's time until the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging enabled better degrees of resection in the 1990s. Modest improvements came with the advent of biomarker-driven targeted chemotherapy in the first decade of the current century.

Dominique Anel, John Hunter, and the Eponymous Hunterian Ligation of Aneurysms: Conception to Current Practice.

The contributions of both Dominique Anel and John Hunter in the development of the eponymous Hunterian ligation of aneurysms are presented. John Hunter, the "father of scientific surgery" lent his name to the eponymous practice of applying ligatures to aneurysmal dilatation of arteries. However, evidence suggests that the operation might antedate him by decades. Dominique Anel was a surgeon in the time of Louis XIV who, after his initial apprenticeships in Toulouse and Montpellier, subsequently served in the French navy. He famously described the lacrimal syringe that bears his name but was also interested in diseases of the bones and arteries. Anel described his technique of ligating an aneurysm of the brachial artery in the winter of 1709-1710 in Turin. His description of ligating just the upper end of the aneurysm without touching the sac was described in his collected works in 1714. This technique was exactly the same as that used by Hunter. However, Hunter had based his decision not to excise the sac on his own research. Hunterian ligation was used routinely before endoaneurysmorrhaphy, after which its popularity declined. Hunterian ligation has been superseded by development of surgical clips and endovascular techniques for intracranial aneurysms. However, the technique is still described occasionally in vascular and neurosurgical literature in the context of treating large aneurysms not amenable to traditional treatment modalities.

The historical perspective in approaches to the spheno-petro-clival meningiomas.

The current literature regarding surgical treatment for tumors in the sphenopetroclival (SPC) region is merely scarce. Through a comprehensive literature review, we investigated the indications, outcomes, and complications of different surgical approaches to the SPC meningiomas. Given its complicated relationship between these slow-progression tumors and some critical neurovascular structures in the SPC region, surgical treatment of these tumors faces the challenge of achieving a maximal grade of resection, while preserving patient functionality. The development of new surgical techniques and approaches in recent years have permitted the advancement in the treatment of these tumors, with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. The choice of a surgical approach as a treatment for the lesion depends mainly on the type of tumor extension, surgeon's preferences, and the displacement of neurovascular structures. Rather than focusing on one single strategy of treatment, the skull-base surgeon should tailor the approach based on the origin and features of the lesion; as well as the peculiarities of the surgical anatomy. This strategy aims to decrease morbidity and to optimize tumor resection and patient quality of life.

Tribute to Theodor Kocher: Far Beyond an Anatomical Reference

We know Kocher's name as an anatomical reference in neurosurgery. In fact, Theodor Kocher was a Swiss general surgeon, and his contributions were such that Kocher was honored in 1909 with the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology, and he was the first surgeon to receive this honor. Kocher participated in the initial scientific phase of medicine, livingwith names that are in history, as well as him; Langenbeck and Virchow, Lucke, Billroth, Horsley, Lister, Halstedt, Pasteur, Osler, Lawson Tait, Verneuil, and a long list and other icons of the time. The present account rescues the many important facets and contributions of the Swiss surgeonTheodor Kocher, and his relationship with several of them. Kocher's memory, surgical instruments and literary production are preserved in a small wing of the University of Bern. The present article highlights how intense Kocher's dedication to the medical field was.

Staged Cranial Surgery for Intracranial Lesions: Historical Perspective.

We follow the development of staged resection from its first description by Walter E. Dandy, one of the founding fathers of neurosurgery, in 1925 in which he removed a large vestibular schwannoma.This historical vignette cites neurosurgical case reports and literature to demonstrate the evolution of staged resection of intracranial lesions, from Dandy's initial use to its becoming a more viable and safe option for the treatment of meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, and skull base lesions (among numerous other intracranial pathologies). We also discuss the current advancements and future perspectives of staged resection that may show promise in effectively treating a wide range of pathologies while simultaneously reducing morbidity rates-a warrant for further exploration of staged cranial surgery as an important tool in neurosurgery.

A Forgotten Tale from the Great War: General Lorenzo Bonomo and the Birth of Italian War Neurosurgery.

Little is known of the advances in battlefield medicine achieved in Italy before and during the Great War. Some deserve wider recognition; this is especially true for the field of neurosurgery. There are a limited number of historical records currently available, fewer still in English, and most of the systematic investigations on field surgery have been in the form of monographs within science history reviews, which obviously lack a strictly clinical perspective. Together with shell shock, the gunshot-related traumatic brain injury (GrTBI) is considered one of the typical, or signature, lesions of the Great War. It was intrinsically linked to trench and mountain warfare: to view the battlefield from a trench/hiding area, soldiers' heads and necks were repeatedly exposed, therefore making them the most likely target for snipers. Military physicians therefore focused their efforts in the clinical and experimental treatment of GrTBI. Among notable contributions of the military surgeons of the time, there is a volume of selected war-surgery lectures conserved in the archives of the Library of the Italian National Academy of Military Medicine. These lectures shed light over the work of General Dr. Lorenzo Bonomo. His incredibly advanced and modern ideas had unfortunately been forgotten. He pioneered research in the ballistic and forensic medical fields, building on first-hand experience, as he performed surgeries himself before the conflict and even while on the frontline, actively working to improve the chances of survival for the Italian troops fighting in the Great War.

History of the Network Approach in Epilepsy Surgery.

We provide a history and overview of the network approach to epilepsy surgery. Models of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) have evolved considerably over the years with more recent models accounting for the connectivity and network properties of epileptic foci. Next, we describe several examples of network phenotypes of focal epilepsy and how these have the potential to influence surgical decision-making and patient outcome. Future research will provide new insight into how network models of the EZ can determine optimal surgical interventions that improve seizure outcomes and optimize cognitive outcomes.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Spine surgery has evolved over centuries from first being practiced with Hippocratic boards and ladders to now being able to treat spinal pathologies with minimal tissue invasion. With the advent of new imaging and surgical technologies, spine surgeries can now be performed minimally invasively with smaller incisions, less blood loss, quicker return to daily activities, and increased visualization. Modern minimally invasive procedures include percutaneous pedicle screw fixation techniques and minimally invasive lateral approach for lumbar interbody fusion (i.e., minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, extreme lateral interbody fusion, oblique lateral interbody fusion) and midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws. Just as evolutions in surgical techniques have helped revolutionize the field of spine surgery, imaging technologies have also contributed significantly. The advent of computer image guidance has allowed spine surgeons to advance their ability to refine surgical techniques, increase the accuracy of spinal hardware placement, and reduce radiation exposure to the operating room staff. As the field of spine surgery looks to the future, many novel technologies are on the horizon, including robotic spine surgery, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to help improve preoperative planning, improve surgical execution, and optimize patient selection to ensure improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. As more spine surgeons begin incorporating these novel minimally invasive techniques into practice, the field of minimally invasive spine surgery will continue to innovate and evolve over the coming years.

Reflections on the History of Nerve Repair - Sir Sydney Sunderland's Final Presentation to the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia.

Sir Sydney Sunderland (1910-1993) was an eminent physician and anatomist who identified the fascicular structure of nerves, and developed the eponymous 5-tiered classification of nerve injuries. Not long before his death, he presented a keynote address to the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. Recently, the videotape of his presentation was discovered. In the presentation, Sir Sydney included discussion on the history of nerve repair, commencing with Herophilus and Galen, and progressing through the Middle Ages, including Leonardo of Bertapaglia, and he further noted the discoveries during the 1800s of the microscope, the axon, and nerve histology (including Remak, Schwann, Nissl, and Golgi), Waller's findings on nerve degeneration, and nerve injury (His, Cajal, Forsmann, and Harrison). Sir Sydney discussed nerve injuries sustained during World War I, with the deleterious effects of infection, and following the many nerve injuries sustained during World War II, he discussed his own discoveries of internal topography of nerve fascicles, and the anatomical substrate of nerve fascicles that limit surgery for nerve repair, nerve grafts, and the basic science of spinal cord repair. This paper presents a transcript of Sunderland's presentation and includes many of his original images used to illustrate this tour de force of nerve repair.

History and advances in spinal neurosurgery.

Insight into the historic contributions made to modern-day spine surgery provides context for understanding the monumental accomplishments comprising current techniques, technology, and clinical success. Only during the last century did surgical growth occur in the treatment of spinal disorders. With that growth came a renaissance of innovation, particularly with the evolution of spinal instrumentation and fixation techniques. In this article, the authors capture some of the key milestones that have led to the field of spine surgery today, with an emphasis on the historical advances related to instrumentation, navigation, minimally invasive surgery, robotics, and neurosurgical training.

Evolution of concepts in epilepsy surgery.

At the time of the first meeting of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 1909, surgical treatment for epilepsy had been accepted as an alternative therapy for over two decades, but was rarely practiced, considered a last resort for carefully selected patients. Localization was based on ictal semiology and identification of a structural lesion. Very few papers on epilepsy surgery were presented at ILAE meetings or published in Epilepsia during the first half of the 20th century. A modest explosion in interest in epilepsy surgery at mid-century resulted from recognition that "invisible" epileptogenic lesions could be identified by EEG, especially for temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy surgery received a second boost in popularity toward the end of the 20th century with the advent of structural and functional neuroimaging, and the number of epilepsy centers worldwide doubled between the first Palm Desert conference in 1986 and the second Palm Desert conference in 1992. Neuroimaging also helped to increase application of surgical treatment to infants and young children with severe epilepsies. Epilepsy surgery was accepted as standard of care for drug-resistant focal epilepsy and was well-represented at international ILAE congresses and in Epilepsia. Advances continue into the 21st century with the introduction of laser ablation, and palliative neuromodulation approaches, which have greatly increased the population of patients who can benefit from surgery. Modern presurgical evaluation techniques have also made surgical treatment possible in many countries with limited resources. Three randomized control trials now have definitively proved the safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery, however, this alternative therapy remains under-utilized even in the industrialized world, where less than 1% of potential candidates are being referred to epilepsy centers. Furthermore, those who are referred receive surgery an average of 20 years after onset of epilepsy, often too late to avoid irreversible disability. The major challenges in realizing the full potential of epilepsy surgery, therefore, are not as much in the continued improvement of the treatment itself, as they are in addressing the treatment gap that is preventing appropriate patients from being referred to full-service epilepsy centers.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Movement Disorders: From Experimental Surgery to Evidence-Based Therapy.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of 3 different targets is the most important therapeutic innovation of the past 30 years for patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD), disabling dystonia, tremors, and refractory Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. When compared with medical treatment alone, controlled studies have shown better motor, nonmotor, and particularly quality-of-life outcomes with large effect sizes for advanced complicated PD that cannot be improved with medication, and also for PD patients with only early fluctuations. Class 1 studies have also shown superiority over medical treatment for generalized, segmental, and botulinum-toxin refractory focal cervical dystonia. Long-term efficacy is established for all indications with open studies. For tremors, open studies have shown that DBS is remarkably effective on PD and essential tremor, but efficacy on severe essential tremor and cerebellar tremors is limited by a tendency for tolerance/habituation, including concerns about long-term efficacy. Open studies of disabling Gilles de la Tourette syndrome show an improvement in tics. New developments hold a promise for further improvement. New hardware with directional stimulation and new stimulation paradigms are further areas of research. The targets of DBS are refined with new imaging processing that will help to diversify the surgical targets. New indications are being explored. Closed-loop DBS using brain or peripheral sensor signals have shown favorable clinical short-term results. Long-term data are lacking, and it is hoped that similar approaches for other movement or behavioral disorders may be developed. Exciting new developments carry the hope for a more pathophysiology-based approach for DBS for various brain circuit disorders. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.