RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV is severely underutilized among sexually minoritized men (SMM). Inequitable access to PrEP-prescribing facilities and providers is a critical barrier to PrEP uptake among SMM. Integrating HIV prevention services, such as PrEP screening, into pharmacy-based settings is a viable solution to addressing HIV inequities in the US. We aimed to examine willingness to obtain PrEP screening in a pharmacy and its associated correlates, leveraging Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model (AHUM), among a national sample of SMM in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the 2020 American Men's Internet Survey, an annual online survey among SMM, were analyzed. Drawing on AHUM-related constructs, we used a modified stepwise Poisson regression with robust variance estimates to examine differences in willingness to screen for PrEP in a pharmacy. Estimated prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI95%). RESULTS: Out of 10,816 men, most (76%) were willing to screen for PrEP in a pharmacy. Participants were more willing to screen for PrEP in a pharmacy if they (1) had a general willingness to use PrEP (PR = 1.52; CI95% =1.45, 1.59); (2) felt comfortable speaking with pharmacy staff about PrEP (PR = 2.71; CI95% =2.47, 2.98); and (3) had HIV-related concerns (PR = 1.04; CI95% =1.02, 1.06). There were no observed differences in men's willingness to screen for PrEP in a pharmacy by race/ethnicity, education level, annual household income, nor insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: Strategically offering PrEP screening in pharmacies could mitigate access-related barriers to HIV prevention services among SMM, particularly across various sociodemographic domains. Importantly, this approach has vitally important implications for addressing broader inequities in HIV prevention. Future studies should examine strategies to successfully integrate PrEP screenings in pharmacies among diverse populations, especially among those at elevated risk for HIV.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmácias/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Introduction: Understanding and identifying the immunological markers and clinical information linked with HIV acquisition is crucial for effectively implementing Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV acquisition. Prior analysis on HIV incidence outcomes have predominantly employed proportional hazards (PH) models, adjusting solely for baseline covariates. Therefore, models that integrate cytokine biomarkers, particularly as time-varying covariates, are sorely needed. Methods: We built a simple model using the Cox PH to investigate the impact of specific cytokine profiles in predicting the overall HIV incidence. Further, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare HIV incidence rates between the treatment and placebo groups while assessing the overall treatment effectiveness. Utilizing stepwise regression, we developed a series of Cox PH models to analyze 48 longitudinally measured cytokine profiles. We considered three kinds of effects in the cytokine profile measurements: average, difference, and time-dependent covariate. These effects were combined with baseline covariates to explore their influence on predictors of HIV incidence. Results: Comparing the predictive performance of the Cox PH models developed using the AIC metric, model 4 (Cox PH model with time-dependent cytokine) outperformed the others. The results indicated that the cytokines, interleukin (IL-2, IL-3, IL-5, IL-10, IL-16, IL-12P70, and IL-17 alpha), stem cell factor (SCF), beta nerve growth factor (B-NGF), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-A), interferon (IFN) alpha-2, serum stem cell growth factor (SCG)-beta, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and cutaneous T-cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK) were significantly associated with HIV incidence. Baseline predictors significantly associated with HIV incidence when considering cytokine effects included: age of oldest sex partner, age at enrollment, salary, years with a stable partner, sex partner having any other sex partner, husband's income, other income source, age at debut, years lived in Durban, and sex in the last 30 days. Discussion: Overall, the inclusion of cytokine effects enhanced the predictive performance of the models, and the PrEP group exhibited reduced HIV incidences compared to the placebo group.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Citocinas , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Citocinas/sangue , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Incidência , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Populations who seek HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are disproportionately affected by hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV). We examined immunity/vaccination against these infections among participants in the Ontario PrEP cohort study (ON-PrEP). METHODS: ON-PrEP is a prospective cohort of HIV-negative PrEP users from 10 Ontario clinics. We descriptively analysed baseline immunity/vaccination against HAV (IgG reactive), HBV (hepatitis B surface antibody >10) and HPV (self-reported three-dose vaccination). We further performed multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with baseline immunity/vaccination. We used cumulative incidence functions to describe vaccine uptake among participants non-immune at baseline. RESULTS: Of 633 eligible participants, 59.1% were white, 85.8% were male and 79.6% were gay. We found baseline evidence of immunity/vaccination against HAV, HBV and HPV in 69.2%, 81.2% and 16.8% of PrEP-experienced participants and 58.9%, 70.3% and 10.4% of PrEP-naïve participants, respectively. Characteristics associated with baseline HAV immunity were greater PrEP duration (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.41/year, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.84), frequent sexually transmitted and bloodborne infection (STBBI) testing (aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.92) and HBV immunity (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 2.09 to 5.98). Characteristics associated with baseline HBV immunity were living in Toronto (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.87 to 6.70) or Ottawa (aOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.40), self-identifying as racialised (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.18), greater PrEP duration (aOR 1.39/year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.90) and HAV immunity (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 2.19 to 6.41). Characteristics associated with baseline HPV vaccination were being aged ≤26 years (aOR 9.28, 95% CI 2.11 to 40.77), annual income between CAD$60 000 and CAD$119 000 (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.34), frequent STBBI testing (aOR 7.00, 95% CI 1.38 to 35.46) and HAV immunity (aOR 6.96, 95% CI 2.00 to 24.25). Among those non-immune at baseline, overall cumulative probability of immunity/vaccination was 0.70, 0.60 and 0.53 among PrEP-experienced participants and 0.93, 0.80 and 0.70 among PrEP-naïve participants for HAV, HBV and HPV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline immunity to HAV/HBV was common, and a sizeable proportion of non-immune participants were vaccinated during follow-up. However, HPV vaccination was uncommon. Continued efforts should be made to remove barriers to HPV vaccination such as cost, inclusion in clinical guidelines and provider recommendation.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite A , Hepatite B , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Hepatite A/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/imunologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Ontário , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend annual hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing for gay and bisexual men (GBM) with HIV and GBM prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). However, there is a limited understanding of HCV testing among GBM. We aimed to examine trends in HCV testing and positivity from 2016 to 2022. METHODS: Using sentinel surveillance data, we examined the proportion of GBM with at least one test and the proportion with a positive test in each year for HCV antibody testing among GBM with no previous HCV positive test, HCV RNA testing among GBM with a positive antibody test but no previous positive RNA test (naïve RNA testing), and HCV RNA testing among people who had a previous RNA positive test and a subsequent negative test (RNA follow-up testing). Trends were examined using logistic regression from 2016 to 2019 and 2020 to 2022. RESULTS: Among GBM with HIV, from 2016 to 2019 antibody testing was stable averaging 55% tested annually. Declines were observed for both naïve HCV RNA testing (75.4%-41.4%: p<0.001) and follow-up HCV RNA testing (70.1%-44.5%: p<0.001). Test positivity declined for HCV antibody tests (2.0%-1.3%: p=0.001), HCV RNA naïve tests (75.4%-41.4%: p<0.001) and HCV RNA follow-up tests (11.3%-3.3%: p=0.001). There were minimal or no significant trends from 2020 to 2022.Among GBM prescribed PrEP, antibody testing declined from 2016 to 2019 (79.4%-69.4%: p<0.001) and was stable from 2020 to 2022. Naïve and follow-up HCV RNA testing was stable with an average of 55% and 60% tested each year, respectively. From 2016-2019, the proportion positive from HCV RNA naïve tests declined (44.1%-27.5%: p<0.046) with no significant change thereafter. Positive follow-up HCV RNA tests fluctuated with no or one new positive test among this group in most years. CONCLUSION: The proportion of GBM with positive HCV tests has declined, however a substantial proportion are not tested annually. A renewed focus on HCV testing, and treatment where required, is warranted to achieve HCV elimination among GBM in Australia.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C , Homossexualidade Masculina , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Humanos , Masculino , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepacivirus/imunologia , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , RNA Viral/sangue , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Screening tools in which participants self-report sexual behaviors can identify people at risk of HIV acquisition for enrollment in preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We compared enrollment outcomes (ie, receiving PrEP vs being excluded by a counselor or declining PrEP) in Mexico's PrEP demonstration project and evaluated the validity of a 4-criteria PrEP eligibility tool in which participants self-reported risk behavior-having condomless anal sex, transactional sex, a partner living with HIV, or a sexually transmitted infection-as compared with PrEP eligibility assessed by a counselor. METHODS: We recruited men who have sex with men and transwomen who were offered PrEP services in Mexico. We characterized participants according to enrollment outcome and identified underlying factors through logistic regression analyses. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the self-reported risk criteria, using the counselor's risk assessment as the point of reference. RESULTS: Of 2460 participants, 2323 (94%) had risk criteria of HIV acquisition according to the 4-criteria tool; 1701 (73%) received PrEP, 247 (11%) were excluded by a counselor, and 351 (15%) declined PrEP despite being considered eligible by the counselor. Participants who were excluded or who declined PrEP were less likely to report HIV risk behaviors than those who received PrEP, and participants who declined PrEP were more likely to be transwomen (vs men who have sex with men) and aged ≤25 years (vs >25 y). The 4-criteria risk tool had high sensitivity (98.6%) and low specificity (29.8%). CONCLUSION: The screening tool identified most participants at risk of HIV acquisition, but counselors' assessment helped refine the decision for enrollment in PrEP by excluding those with low risk. Public health strategies are needed to enhance enrollment in PrEP among some groups.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Masculino , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , México/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adolescente , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas Transgênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Assunção de Riscos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The UK pledged commitment to the global strategy of zero new HIV infections and HIV-related deaths by 2030. PrEP was commissioned in England in 2020 and is fundamental to achieving these targets, yet awareness and uptake are suboptimal in certain populations. METHOD: Sexual Health London (SHL) incorporated questions on its e-triage questionnaire estimating need for PrEP amongst online service users. Two types of signposting messaging were shown to users directing them to more detailed online content: PrEP-discussion (potential need) and PrEP-eligible (assumed need). The effectiveness of this signposting was evaluated by reviewing demographics and triage responses in returning users. RESULTS: 426,149 SHL users requested STI screening between 1.7.21-31.10.22. 16% (69,867/426,149) and 32.2% (137,489/426,149) of individuals received PrEP-eligible and PrEP-discussion signposting. The PrEP-eligible cohort were: 41.0% gay/bisexual or other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), 16.3% heterosexual males, 33.1% heterosexual females, and 60.6% were of white ethnicity. The PrEP-discussion cohort were: 9.3% GBMSM, 34.3%% heterosexual males, 45.5% heterosexual females and 63.7% of white ethnicity. 50.4% (35,190/69,867) and 41.3% (56,808/137,489) of the PrEP-eligible and PrEP discussion cohorts ordered a subsequent SHL STI testing kit, during which 10.0% (3510/35,190) and 5.9% (3364/56,808) reported taking PrEP. Of those who denied taking PrEP, 59% (18,702/31,680) and 61.0% (32,559/53,444) triggered PrEP signposting again. 95.4% of PrEP starters were GBMSM (6562/6874) and 1.4% (97/6874) heterosexual males/females. CONCLUSION: The e-service demonstrated feasibility in estimating PrEP need and signposting service users. Up to 16% of returning users subsequently commenced PrEP. This highlights significant missed opportunities for the remaining online users, who continue to report HIV acquisition risk(s). Further efforts regionally/nationally to optimise uptake of PrEP, particularly among under-represented groups are warranted.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Saúde Sexual , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Londres/epidemiologia , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Internet , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Due to increased use of pre-exposure prohylaxis (PrEP) and its potential to affect HIV screening of blood donors, we undertook antiretroviral residual testing among HIV-negative male donors in England. METHODS: Residual plasma samples were obtainnd from 46 male donors confirmed positive for syphilis and 96 donors who were repeat reactive for HIV antibodies in screening but confirmed as HIV-negative by reference testing. These were tested for concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine by high-performance liquid chromatograhpy coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: We found evidence of pre-exposure or post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP) use in three male blood donors confirmed positive for syphilis (3 out of 46 screened, 6.5%). Two were estimated to have taken PrEP/PEP within a day of donating, and the third within 2 days. Two were new donors, whereas one had donated previously but acquired syphilis infection after his last donation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that a small proportion of blood donors have not been disclosing PrEP/PEP use and therefore donating in non-compliance to donor eligibility criteria.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Anti-HIV/sangue , Doadores de Sangue , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Doadores de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , África , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Introduction: vitamin D maintains the concentration of calcium and phosphorus within the physiological range, allowing normal metabolism and bone mineralization. Recently, vitamin D deficiency has been related not only with rickets but also with an increased risk of other pathologies. The aim of this descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was to assess vitamin D concentration levels in a healthy pediatric population, as well as the current situation of prophylaxis. Vitamin D determination was measured by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. Methods: a total of 258 healthy patients between 3 months and 15 years of age were enrolled (6.77 ± 3.95 years; 73.6 % were male). Results: the mean value of 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 26.60 ng/mL ± 8.02 ng/mL, and up to 20.9 % of the population showed insufficient levels. Statistically significant differences in vitamin D levels were observed between ages (p = 0.002), ethnicity groups (p = 0.038), and skin types (p = 0.000). In addition, a higher prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in children who had never previously received vitamin D supplementation (41.6 %) was observed compared to those that had taken supplementation in the first year of life (16.7 %). Conclusion: our study shows a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy children, and the benefit of prophylaxis with vitamin D supplementation.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la vitamina D mantiene la concentración de calcio y fósforo dentro del rango fisiológico, permitiendo un metabolismo normal y la correcta mineralización de los huesos. Recientemente, la deficiencia de vitamina D se ha relacionado no solo con el raquitismo sino también con el aumento del riesgo de otras patologías. El objetivo de este estudio descriptivo, observacional y transversal fue conocer los niveles de concentración de vitamina D en una población pediátrica sana y la situación actual en cuanto a la profilaxis. La determinación de la vitamina D se midió mediante la concentración sérica de 25-hidroxivitamina D (25(OH)D). Material y métodos: se inscribieron 258 pacientes sanos de entre 3 meses y 15 años (6,77 ± 3,95 años; 73,6 % de hombres). Resultados: el valor medio de 25(OH)D fue de 26,60 ng/ml ± 8,02 ng/ml; el 20,9 % de la población mostró un nivel insuficiente. Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los niveles de vitamina D de las distintas edades (p = 0,002), grupos étnicos (p = 0,038) y fototipos (p = 0,000). Además, se observó una mayor prevalencia de la insuficiencia de vitamina D en los niños que nunca antes habían recibido suplementos de vitamina D (41,6 %) en comparación con los que habían tomado suplementos en el primer año de vida (16,7 %). Conclusiones: el presente estudio muestra una alta prevalencia del déficit de vitamina D en los niños sanos y el beneficio de una correcta profilaxis en edades tempranas con suplementos de vitamina D.
Assuntos
Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/normas , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria/métodos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Deficiência de Vitamina D/fisiopatologiaAssuntos
Saúde da Mulher , Aborto Espontâneo/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Etários , Alphapapillomavirus , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Fertilidade , Humanos , Expulsão de Dispositivo Intrauterino , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Útero/virologiaRESUMO
Increasing HIV testing frequency in gay and bisexual men (GBM) is critical to reducing the time between HIV infection and diagnosis. Using anonymous national behavioural surveillance data (2013-2018) from 43,753 surveys of Australian GBM, we examined HIV testing frequency trends and factors differentiating PrEP-users, non-PrEP-users reporting two or more tests in the previous year, and non-PrEP-users reporting less frequent testing. The proportion tested at least annually increased from 64.4% in 2013 to 70.8% in 2018 (p-trend < 0.001), and from 73.9% to 84.6% among the 51.6% of men classified as higher-risk. Among higher-risk men, having two or more tests in the previous year increased from 48.0% to 69.3% (p-trend < 0.001). Among higher-risk non-PrEP-users, it increased from 47.2% to 54.8% (p-trend < 0.001), however, there was a decrease since 2016 (p-trend < 0.001). Among PrEP-users, it increased from 82.1% in 2013 to 97.3% in 2018 (p-trend < 0.001). Non-PrEP-using higher-risk men having less frequent tests reported lower risk than PrEP-users and non-PrEP-using men reporting two or more tests in the previous year. However, recent risk behaviour was not uncommon: nearly half reported condomless sex; one-fifth reported receptive condomless sex with ejaculation; over half reported group sex; one-quarter used drugs for the purposes of sex; and one-fifth had more than ten sex partners. Efforts are needed to encourage frequent testing and PrEP use among non-PrEP-users who are at higher-risk.
Assuntos
Bissexualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Assunção de Riscos , Testes Sorológicos , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Parceiros Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for individuals at significant risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus acquisition is approved for individuals weighing at least 35 kg by the Food and Drug Administration. This cross-sectional study analyzed indications for PrEP in a clinical setting. METHODS: There were 429 charts reviewed from adolescents between 15 and 21 years old seen for preventive care visits at an adolescent primary care center in the Deep South during a 1-year timeframe. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were completed to identify factors associated with indications for PrEP. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of 429 adolescents (between 15 and 21 years) had a PrEP indication; 77% were women and 95% heterosexual. Significant factors associated with an indication for PrEP included living with a nonparent or nonrelative and polysubstance use. No adolescents with an indication for PrEP were prescribed PrEP. A sensitivity analysis comparing indications for PrEP between the 2014 and 2017 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines revealed no significant differences in percent with an indication (44.5% vs. 42.8%) or factors associated with indications. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-exposure prophylaxis as a biomedical tool for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) may remain underutilized. A key factor in improving utilization involves providers being able to recognize AYAs who may have an indication for PrEP with a specific focus on those AYAs who do not live in households with parents or a surrogate family member and those who are polysubstance users.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Medicina do Adolescente/métodos , Alabama , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Usuários de Drogas , Feminino , HIV/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Heterossexualidade , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Young black men and transgender women (transwomen) who have sex with men or transwomen are most vulnerable in terms of risk for HIV infection, also reflected in their extremely high incidence rates. As testing rates and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake remain suboptimal among these groups, primarily due to unique structural barriers, the present analyses draw on data from an online survey, administered October 2014 to August 2015, to explore social support-related predictors of knowledge and behavior around HIV prevention.Participants were 169 biological men who identified as black, with a mean age of 24 (SD = 2.97, range 17-29); 8% identified as transwomen. Logistic regression models assessed whether HIV-related social support predicted HIV testing patterns, PrEP awareness, and use. Those with higher HIV-related social support reported having been more likely to have ever tested (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.48; p < 0.001) and tested in the past 6 months (aOR = 1.22; p < 0.01). They were also more likely to intend to test in the next 6 months (aOR = 1.16; p < 0.001), including at a medical office or community-based organization (aOR = 1.20; p < 0.001), yet less likely to intend to self-test (aOR = 0.81; p < 0.001). Lastly, higher social support was significantly associated with prior knowledge of self-testing (aOR = 1.19; p < 0.05), couples testing (aOR = 1.26; p < 0.001), and PrEP (aOR = 1.22; p < 0.01), as well as prevention self-efficacy (aOR = 1.30; p < 0.001), but inversely associated with prior self-testing (aOR = 0.80; p < 0.05). For young black men and transwomen who have sex with men or transwomen, HIV-related social support, which likely has a strong peer component, appears to be a facilitator of optimal testing and intentions to test, as well as awareness of novel prevention strategies (like self-testing or PrEP). However, community resourcefulness needs to be bolstered by other mechanisms, such as changes within healthcare settings, to increase actual use of novel prevention modalities.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Teste de HIV/estatística & dados numéricos , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Grupo Associado , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pessoas Transgênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The combined incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in MSM PrEP (preexposure prophylaxis) cohorts now frequently exceeds 100 per 100 person years. The efficacy of antiretroviral PrEP in reducing HIV transmission has led to efforts to find similar biomedical ways reduce sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence. We review the recent evidence for these and other strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Doxycycline PrEP/postexposure prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the incidence of syphilis and chlamydia but not gonorrhoea. A meningococcal vaccine has been found to result in a lower incidence of gonorrhoea. Novel insights into the role of the pharynx in the transmission of gonorrhoea have led to clinical trials of oral antiseptics to reduce the spread of gonorrhoea. Intensified STI screening has been introduced in a number of clinics. Serious concerns have however been raised about the emergence of resistance to each of these strategies. This is particularly true for doxycycline PrEP which is not advocated by any guidelines we reviewed. SUMMARY: Randomized controlled trials are urgently required to ascertain the benefits and risks of interventions to reduce STIs in MSM PrEP cohorts.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/tendências , Minorias Sexuais e de GêneroRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 38,000 new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections occur in the United States each year; these infections can be prevented. A proposed national initiative, Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America, incorporates three strategies (diagnose, treat, and prevent HIV infection) and seeks to leverage testing, treatment, and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce new HIV infections in the United States by at least 90% by 2030. Targets to reach this goal include that at least 95% of persons with HIV receive a diagnosis, 95% of persons with diagnosed HIV infection have a suppressed viral load, and 50% of those at increased risk for acquiring HIV are prescribed PrEP. Using surveillance, pharmacy, and other data, CDC determined the current status of these three initiative strategies. METHODS: CDC analyzed HIV surveillance data to estimate annual number of new HIV infections (2013-2017); estimate the percentage of infections that were diagnosed (2017); and determine the percentage of persons with diagnosed HIV infection with viral load suppression (2017). CDC analyzed surveillance, pharmacy, and other data to estimate PrEP coverage, reported as a percentage and calculated as the number of persons who were prescribed PrEP divided by the estimated number of persons with indications for PrEP. RESULTS: The number of new HIV infections remained stable from 2013 (38,500) to 2017 (37,500) (p = 0.448). In 2017, an estimated 85.8% of infections were diagnosed. Among 854,206 persons with diagnosed HIV infection in 42 jurisdictions with complete reporting of laboratory data, 62.7% had a suppressed viral load. Among an estimated 1.2 million persons with indications for use of PrEP, 18.1% had been prescribed PrEP in 2018. CONCLUSION: Accelerated efforts to diagnose, treat, and prevent HIV infection are needed to achieve the U.S. goal of at least 90% reduction in the number of new HIV infections by 2030.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga Viral/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cases of HIV, while infrequent, have been reported during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine use as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We describe the incidence of HIV and patterns of PrEP use within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among persons initiating PrEP in the VHA between July 2012 and April 2016 using national VHA data. We defined time on PrEP and time at risk of HIV exposure as the total time from the first PrEP fill to exhaustion of supply of the final PrEP prescription. We identified incident cases of HIV infection after PrEP initiation based on laboratory data. Medication adherence measures and days without pills were calculated using pharmacy fill data. We used a chart review to determine patient-reported PrEP use around the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 825 unique patients initiating PrEP; they were 97% men and 67% white, with a mean age of 41 years. Six HIV infections were observed during the study period, yielding an HIV incidence of 0.8 (Poisson exact 95% confidence interval: 0.3 to 1.8) cases per 100 person-years. Two cases occurred during active PrEP use by self-report and perfect adherence based on fill data. Both were infected with viruses containing the M184V mutation. Four additional cases were diagnosed after self-reported discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: HIV infection was rare in a nationwide cohort of PrEP users. Although most of the infections occurred during inconsistent PrEP use, infections during periods of high measured adherence were also observed. These findings highlight the importance of PrEP persistence during periods of risk.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , HIV/genética , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Viral/genética , Emtricitabina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Ácidos Fosforosos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study aims to analyze the clinical use of ornidazole injection at the post-marketing stage by centralized hospital monitoring system method, and investigate its widespread use in patients, in order to regulate and guide the rational drug use, improve the drug specificity and provide a basis for drug therapy. The study adopts a prospective, multi-center, large sample size, centralized hospital monitoring system. We selected five leading hospitals in Hubei province, and observed the inpatients who received the ornidazole injection from July 1, 2015 to October 31, 2015. The basic information of patients was recorded, as well as the drug use and adverse events. The statistical analysis was performed based on these data. A total of 4396 individuals were enrolled in this study, most of them were middle-aged female patients and the ornidazole injection was mainly used as prophylactic prior to surgery to prevent the infections, and surgical treatment of anaerobic infections, abdominal infections and pelvic infections. The irrational drug use existed mainly in the prescribing and administration process, including unreasonable dosing frequency, rapid intravenous drip speed and extended duration of drug use. Eleven cases of adverse reactions were collected during the monitoring, incidence rate of adverse reactions was 2.5; adverse drug reactions occurred within 30 min. The study results fully reflected the usage of ornidazole injection in the real world. Based on the study, we calculated the adverse reaction incidence of ornidazole and identified the risk factors which may affect the safety of ornidazole injection. Study results strongly recommend that the manufacturers should publish standards for inpatient use and doctors should prescribe with caution accordingly.
Assuntos
Antitricômonas/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/tendências , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Ornidazol/uso terapêutico , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Antitricômonas/efeitos adversos , Antitricômonas/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/prevenção & controle , Ornidazol/efeitos adversos , Ornidazol/provisão & distribuição , Infecção Pélvica/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While gender-based violence (GBV) has been shown to increase women's risk of HIV acquisition, the role of GBV in the HIV testing to care continuum is less clear. Clarifying how GBV may act as a barrier to accessing HIV services, treatment and care - such as anti-retroviral treatment (ART) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) - will not only provide insights into how to best meet individual women's HIV care needs, but also inform public health oriented HIV epidemic control strategies. METHODS: Through a comprehensive scoping review, we synthesized and analyzed existing evidence regarding the influence of GBV on engagement in PrEP and the HIV care continuum among women living with HIV, including members of key populations (female sex workers, transgender women and women who use drugs). We explored PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published in 2003-2017. Of the 279 sources identified, a subset of 51 sources met the criteria and were included in the scoping review. RESULTS: Studies were identified from 17 countries. The majority of studies utilized quantitative cross-sectional designs (n = 33), with the rest using longitudinal (n = 4), qualitative (n = 10) or mixed methods (n = 4) designs. Taken together, findings suggest that GBV impedes women's uptake of HIV testing, care, and treatment, yet this can vary across different geographic and epidemic settings. Substantial gaps in the literature do still exist, including studies on the impact of GBV on engagement in PrEP, and research among key populations. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review contributes to our knowledge regarding the role GBV plays in women's engagement in PrEP and the HIV care continuum. Findings reveal the need for more longitudinal research to provide insights into the causal pathways linking GBV and HIV care and treatment outcomes. Research is also needed to illuminate the impact of GBV on PrEP use and adherence as well as the impact of GBV on engagement along the HIV care continuum among key populations. It is critical that programs and research keep pace with these findings in order to reduce the global burden of GBV and HIV among women.
Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Violência de Gênero/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , HIV , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Profissionais do Sexo/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/virologia , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heterosexual men in South Africa are a large key population to exposure to HIV, yet preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among this population have not, to date, been investigated in the literature. This paper aims to explore HIV prevention preferences among heterosexual men in urban South Africa, as well as to examine the demand and characteristics of men who favour long-acting injectable (LAI) PrEP over condoms and oral PrEP. METHODS: Data were collected among 178 self-reported HIV-negative heterosexual men, who were given example products and information before being asked which they preferred. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse which characteristics were associated with product choice. RESULTS: 48% (n = 85) of participants preferred LAI PrEP, while 33% (n = 58) and 20% (n = 35) chose oral PrEP and condoms respectively. Having children (marginal effect = 0.22; 95% CI [0.01, 0.44]) or having higher risk attitude scores (marginal effect = 0.03; 95% CI [0.01, 0.06]) was significantly associated with a choice of LAI PrEP, while those who had unprotected anal intercourse (marginal effect = - 0.42; 95% CI [- 0.57, - 0.27]) and those who were concerned with protection against other sexually transmitted infections over HIV (marginal effect = - 0.42; 95% CI [- 0.60, - 0.24]) appeared less likely to prefer LAI PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested a relatively high demand and theoretical acceptability for LAI PrEP among heterosexual men in urban South Africa, but there appeared to be fewer distinct predictors for the willingness to use LAI PrEP compared to studies conducted among gay and bisexual men and women. Nevertheless, the findings contribute to the mapping of the demand and determinants of heterosexual men's preferences for novel antiretroviral-based prevention in sub-Saharan Africa, and the data could aid in the differentiated design of future HIV prevention strategies using LAI PrEP in conjunction with other methods.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Heterossexualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , HIV , Humanos , Masculino , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , África do Sul , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Miami has the highest rate of new HIV diagnoses in the United States. We examined the early successes and challenges in fulfilling recommendations made by the Miami-Dade County HIV/AIDS Getting to Zero Task Force, formed by local experts in 2016. METHODS: We used a host of surveillance data, published empirical studies, public reports, and unpublished data from partners of the Task Force to evaluate progress and challenges in meeting the recommendations. RESULTS: Improvements in prevention and care included routinized HIV testing in emergency departments, moving the linkage-to-care benchmark from 90 to 30 days, increased viral suppression, and awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis. However, treatment enrollment, viral suppression, and pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake remained low. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations from the Task Force provide excellent guidance for implementing evidence-based HIV prevention in Miami, yet success in achieving the recommendations will require continued or increased support in many public health sectors in South Florida.