The Role and Professional Standards of the Adult-Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Hospice and Palliative Care.

The adult/gerontology (gero) nurse practitioner (NP) delivers primary and/or specialty palliative care to persons and their families who live each day with a myriad of serious illnesses. In this role, the adult/gero NP uses their skill set to address the whole person (physical, psychological, social, and spiritual/existential) to improve the quality of life for persons they care for. This article is the fourth in a series of 6 highlighting the different roles of the adult/gero NP and the advanced certified hospice and palliative registered nurse, and how these 2 roles overlap. The purpose of this article was to provide details of education and certification pathways for these NP roles, describe the overlaps in clinical care, and illustrate how the adult/gero NP in palliative and hospice care can contribute to leadership in program development for care of persons and their families who live with serious illness.

Oncology Nurse Practitioner Competencies: Defining Best Practices in the Oncology Setting.

BACKGROUND: The oncology nurse practitioner (ONP) role has evolved since the first ONP competencies were published by the Oncology Nursing Society in 2007. An update was completed in 2019 to reflect the rapidly expanding role. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to describe the process of the ONP competency development and identify potential applications across a variety of oncology settings. METHODS: The team performed an extensive literature review of the research about ONP practice across the cancer care continuum. Peer and expert review were conducted to ensure the competencies were comprehensive and relevant. FINDINGS: The ONP competencies provide a solid, evidence-based benchmark to standardize the ONP role and practice, thereby ensuring that patients receive the highest-quality cancer care.

Peripheral Vascular Disease and Implication of Nursing Practice: A Brief Literature Review.

Nowadays nurse practitioners are working in several acute hospital settings in different specialized departments. For decades, studies have shown the implications of nurse practice in peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) to have several major benefits. However, there are very limited studies and data on this particular aspect. In this literature review, we briefly discuss the implication of nursing practice in PVD/PVI. This review briefly shows that nursing practice has a major contribution and implication in the treatment of patients with PVD or PVI, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. From available research, we briefly discuss the implication of nursing practice pre- and postoperatively for PVI. Nurses also contribute significantly in catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy, in smoking cessation programs organized for patients with PVD, and in screening patients for PVD. The vascular nurse practitioners are also involved in providing healthcare advice in order to reduce the risk of disease progression. The major lack of research in this particular field should further inspire scientists to develop and carry out research to further investigate and demonstrate the contribution of nurses in the treatment and management of PVD or PVI, which is gradually becoming a major issue.

A chemotherapy privileging process for advanced practice providers at an academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists are advanced practice providers who are highly trained and qualified healthcare professionals that can help support traditional demands on oncologists' increased time in direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to detail and assess the creation of a privileging process for this group of medical professionals within an academic medical center. Obtaining the designation of limited oncology practice provider (LOPP) gives the right to modify chemotherapy orders and to order supportive care medications. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team developed a comprehensive training process inclusive of required educational domains, knowledge goals, and educational activities to become an LOPP. In 2018, five years after the implementation of the privileging process, a survey was distributed to assess perceptions of the training process and integration of LOPPs within oncology practice. RESULTS: Most oncologists noted that working with LOPPs is beneficial to oncology practice (94%) and that they make modifying chemotherapy orders more efficient (87%). Greater than 82% of LOPPs also reported that their privileges streamline the chemotherapy process and make them feel valuable. CONCLUSION: The creation of the LOPP designation is an effective way to integrate nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists within oncology practice. The inclusion of a focused privileging process ensures the safety of cancer care provided and has created a streamlined process for chemotherapy modifications and supportive care.

Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers and Enablers of Optimal Prescribing in Patients with Dementia and Coexisting Conditions.

PURPOSE: Patients with dementia experience high rates of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication use, and adverse drug events. There is little guidance for clinicians on how to optimize prescribing for this population. Our objective was to investigate clinician-perceived barriers to and facilitators of optimizing prescribing for people with dementia. METHODS: Qualitative study involving semistructured interviews of primary care and specialist clinicians in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 12 primary care and 9 specialist clinicians, with a mean (SD) age of 47 (9) and mean (SD) of 14 (10) years in practice. Clinicians cited decisions regarding the following drug classes as particularly challenging: oral anticoagulants, antidiabetic agents, statins, bladder antimuscarinics, and antipsychotics. Perceived enablers of optimizing prescribing included access to interdisciplinary services and guidelines for nondementia illnesses (eg, diabetes) addressing the care of people with dementia. Barriers included the lack of data on efficacy and safety of most medications in people with dementia, difficulty assessing medication effects in an individual patient, and the perception that stopping medications is seen as "giving up." Clinicians used a variety of strategies to discuss risks and benefits of medications with patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians identified numerous barriers to and some facilitators of optimizing prescribing in people with dementia. More data are needed on the benefits and harms of stopping medications in this population. Research should also test different approaches for supporting informed decision making about medications by people with dementia and caregivers.

A Direct Comparison of the Clinical Practice Patterns of Advanced Practice Providers and Doctors.

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs, physician shortages, and an aging patient population have increased the demand and utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs). Despite their expanding role in care delivery, little research has evaluated the care delivered by APPs compared with physicians. METHODS: We used clinical patient simulations to measure and compare the clinical care offered by APPs and physicians, collecting data from 4 distinct health care systems/hospitals in the United States between 2013 and 2017. Specialties ranged from primary care to hospital medicine and oncology. Primary study outcomes were to 1) measure any differences in practice patterns between APPs and physicians, and 2) determine whether the use of serial measurement and feedback could mitigate any such differences. RESULTS: At baseline, we found no major differences in overall performance of APPs compared with physicians (P = .337). APPs performed 3.2% better in history taking (P = .013) and made 10.5% fewer unnecessary referrals (P = .025), whereas physicians ordered 17.6% fewer low-value tests per case (P = .042). Regardless of specialty or site, after 4 rounds of serial measurement and provider-specific feedback, APPs and physicians had similar increases in average overall scores-7.4% and 7.6%, respectively (P < .001 for both). Not only did both groups improve, but practice differences between the groups disappeared, leading to a 9.1% decrease in overall practice variation. CONCLUSIONS: We found only modest differences in quality of care provided by APPs and physicians. Importantly, both groups improved their performance with serial measurement and feedback so that after 4 rounds, the original differences were mitigated entirely and overall variation significantly reduced. Our data suggest that APPs can provide high quality care in multiple clinical settings.

Setting Expectations, Following Orders, Safety, and Standardization: Clinicians' Strategies to Guide Difficult Conversations About Opioid Prescribing.

BACKGROUND: Evidence has continued to accumulate regarding the potential risks of treating chronic pain with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Clinical practice guidelines now encourage clinicians to implement practices designed to reduce opioid-related risks. Yet how clinicians implement these guidelines within the context of the patient encounter has received little attention. OBJECTIVE: This secondary analysis aimed to identify and describe clinicians' strategies for managing prescription opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors among patients prescribed LTOT for chronic pain. DESIGN: Individual interviews guided by a semi-structured interview protocol probed: (1) methods clinicians utilize to reduce prescription opioid misuse and address aberrant opioid-related behaviors; (2) how clinicians respond to misuse; and (3) resources and constraints faced in managing and treating misuse among their patients. PARTICIPANTS: Interviews were conducted with 24 physicians and nurse practitioners, representing 22 Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities across the USA, who had one or more patients in their clinical panels who were prescribed LTOT for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. APPROACH: Qualitative content analysis was the analytic approach utilized. A codebook was developed iteratively following group coding and discussion. All transcripts were coded with the finalized codebook. Quotes pertaining to key themes were retrieved and, following careful review, sorted into themes, which were then further categorized into sub-themes. Quotes that exemplified key sub-themes were selected for inclusion. KEY RESULTS: We detail the challenges clinicians describe in navigating conversations with patients around prescription opioid misuse, which include patient objection as well as clinician ambivalence. We identify verbal heuristics as one strategy clinicians utilize to structure these difficult conversations, and describe four heuristics: setting expectations, following orders, safety, and standardization. CONCLUSION: Clinicians frequently use verbal heuristics to routinize and increase the efficiency of care management discussions related to opioid prescribing, redirect responsibility, and defuse the potential emotional charge of the encounter.

Care coordination for complex cancer survivors in an integrated safety-net system: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The growing numbers of cancer survivors challenge delivery of high-quality survivorship care by healthcare systems. Innovative ways to improve care coordination for patients with cancer and multiple chronic conditions ("complex cancer survivors") are needed to achieve better care outcomes, improve patient experience of care, and lower cost. Our study, Project CONNECT, will adapt and implement three evidence-based care coordination strategies, shown to be effective for primary care conditions, among complex cancer survivors. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to: 1) Implement a system-level EHR-driven intervention for 500 complex cancer survivors at Parkland; 2) Test effectiveness of the strategies on system- and patient-level outcomes measured before and after implementation; and 3) Elucidate system and patient factors that facilitate or hinder implementation and result in differences in experiences of care coordination between complex patients with and without cancer. METHODS: Project CONNECT is a quasi-experimental implementation study among 500 breast and colorectal cancer survivors with at least one of the following chronic conditions: diabetes, hypertension, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, or heart disease. We will implement three evidence-based care coordination strategies in a large, county integrated safety-net health system: 1) an EHR-driven registry to facilitate patient transitions between primary and oncology care; 2) co-locating a nurse practitioner trained in care coordination within a complex care team; 3) and enhancing teamwork through coaching. Segmented regression analysis will evaluate change in system-level (i.e. composite care quality score) and patient-level outcomes (i.e. self-reported care coordination). To evaluate implementation, we will merge quantitative findings with structured observations and physician and patient interviews. DISCUSSION: This study will result in an evaluation toolkit identifying key model elements, barriers, and facilitators that can be used to guide care coordination interventions in other safety-net settings. Because Parkland is a vanguard of safety-net healthcare nationally, findings will be widely applicable as other safety-nets move toward increased integration, enhanced EHR capability, and experience with growing patient diversity. Our proposal recognizes the complexity of interventions and scaffolds evidence-based strategies together to meet the needs of complex patients, systems of care, and service integration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02943265 . Registered 24 October 2016.

Understanding the Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Oncology in the United States.

PURPOSE: Advanced practice providers (APPs, which include nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]) are integral members of oncology teams. This study aims to identify all oncology APPs and to understand personal and practice characteristics (including compensation) of those APPs. METHODS: We identified APPs who practice oncology from membership and claims data. We surveyed 3,055 APPs about their roles in clinical care. RESULTS: We identified at least 5,350 APPs in oncology and an additional 5,400 who might practice oncology. Survey respondents totaled 577, which provided a 19% response rate. Results focused on 540 NPs and PAs. Greater than 90% reported satisfaction with career choice. Respondents identified predominately as White (89%) and female (94%). NPs and PAs spent the majority (80%) of time in direct patient care. The top four patient care activities were patient counseling (NPs = 94%; PAs = 98%), prescribing (NPs = 93%; PAs = 97%), treatment management (NPs = 89%; PAs = 93%), and follow-up visits (NPs = 81%; PAs = 86%). A majority of all APPs reported both independent and shared visits (65% hematology/oncology/survivorship/prevention/pediatric hematology/oncology; 85% surgical/gynecologic oncology; 78% radiation oncology). A minority of APPs reported that they conducted only shared visits. Average annual compensation was between $113,000 and $115,000, which is approximately $10,000 higher than average pay for nononcology APPs. CONCLUSION: We identified 5,350 oncology APPs and conclude that number may be as high as 7,000. Results suggest that practices that incorporate APPs routinely rely on them for patient care. Given the increasing number of patients with and survivors of cancer, APPs are important to ensure access to quality cancer care.

Oncology Nurse Practitioner Role: Recommendations From the Oncology Nursing Society's Nurse Practitioner Summit.

BACKGROUND: Oncology nurse practitioners (ONPs) are advanced practice RNs prepared at the graduate level with high-level knowledge and skills in oncology. Because of challenges in educational programs and variability in the scope of practice at the state and institutional level, many ONPs are challenged to practice to the full extent of their education, certification, and licensure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review issues affecting the education and practice patterns of ONPs and to identify solutions to address the challenges that exist for ONPs. METHODS: Members of the Oncology Nursing Society's Nurse Practitioner Summit summarized the challenges faced by ONPs related to education, training, practice, and professional development. FINDINGS: Efforts to promote ONP practice at the fullest extent of licensure and across various settings should be prioritized. Resources must be devoted to education, onboarding, and retention to integrate and retain ONPs as leaders of the interprofessional team.

Engaging More Nurses in Cancer Preventive Care: Challenges and Opportunities.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Nurse-led care is crucial to improving the effectiveness of cancer prevention, as demonstrated by research. However, barriers to nurse-led cancer preventive care are still prevalent. What are the challenges that impede nurses from providing effective preventive care? How can hospital leaders address these challenges to better engage nurses in preventive care? What should be the focal areas in terms of policy changes and training programs? This article explores those questions. We examine the difficulties nurses have encountered. We identify the barriers yet to be examined extensively. Finally, we propose that many barriers can be addressed through carefully designed nurses' training programs and substantial policy changes. Our data were collected from a Nurse Oncology Education Program survey that included questions on perceived oncology knowledge, current cancer-related preventive practices, and barriers to preventive practices. We identified the barriers for the nurse population studied and opportunities to overcome these barriers.

Nurse Practitioners as Disruptive Innovators in Palliative Medicine.

As the population ages, the corresponding rise in people living with life-limiting illnesses will lead to a greater need for clinician experts in palliative medicine. There are not enough physicians available to care for the growing number of patients, however. We believe that nurse practitioners are well positioned to meet this demand. In this paper, we will use the concept of disruptive innovations to provide support for our belief that nurse practitioners can, and should, take a larger role in palliative medicine. First, we will describe how 2 general types of business models-solution shops and value-adding processes-can be applied to health care in general and palliative medicine specifically. Second, we will describe the concept of disruptive innovations. Finally, we will use these business models to explain how nurse practitioners are particularly well suited to disrupt the current business model of palliative medicine, thereby allowing more patients with life-limiting illness to receive the high-quality care they need.

Screening for depression: Review of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Depression is a major health concern encountered by nurse practitioners working in an array of health care settings. Many current guidelines and articles on this topic recommend using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as a screening tool. Nurse practitioners should have a sophisticated knowledge of this tool. METHODS: Review of the criteria for diagnosing depression as well as depression screening tools. Database search of EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE for articles about the PHQ-9. Discussion of how the instrument is used in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ-9 is a free tool that nurse practitioners can use to screen patients in the primary care environment. Screening will detect more instances of depression, which is often missed in this population of patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurse practitioners can and should use the PHQ-9 when screening for depression. However, they should do so with full knowledge and awareness of its strengths and limitations.

Impact of the acute care nurse practitioner in reducing the number of unwarranted daily laboratory tests in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Frequent laboratory testing may be necessary at times for critically ill patients. However, the practice of indiscriminate laboratory test ordering is common. PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to assess the effectiveness of the acute care nurse practitioner (ACNP) in reducing the number of unwarranted laboratory tests ordered for ICU patients. To determine whether the presence of an ACNP would make a difference, an ACNP was present on daily ICU multidisciplinary rounds to facilitate the discussion of the laboratory testing needs for each patient for the following 24-hour period. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the project, 41 in the comparison and 40 in the intervention group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups. The project demonstrated that although there was an increase in tests ordered for the intervention group, the increase was brought about by an increase in specific individual tests rather than an increase in panels of laboratory tests. A reduction in patient cost was observed for the number of tests ordered. No increase in adverse events was noted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Acute care nurse practitioner presence on multidisciplinary rounds may be an effective method to change the practice toward the ordering of tests based on clinical indication.

Nurse practitioners' completion of Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment forms in West Virginia: A secondary analysis of 12 months of data from the state registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advanced care planning documents, such as the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), require authorized medical provider signatures; only recently have nurse practitioners (NPs) been authorized to sign these forms. Recent legislation in West Virginia (WV) granting NPs signatory authority on POLST forms and the creation of a statewide registry provides an opportunity to examine the completion rates. The aim of this study was to investigate how recent legislation allowing NPs signatory authority for POLST forms has affected POLST completion. METHODS: Data were obtained from the WV statewide registry of POST forms completed by all authorized personnel. Forms submitted by NPs were compared with those completed by physicians on patient demographics, setting, resuscitation status, level of medical intervention, and errors. Variables were cross-tabulated by provider type to determine whether and how NP POST completion differed from that of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-five NPs submitted 430 POST forms to the WV registry, which constituted 14.4% of the POST forms received. Ten NPs in community and hospital specialist palliative care teams submitted more than two thirds of these 430 forms. Nurse practitioner-completed POST forms were more likely to order do not resuscitate and comfort measures than POST forms ordered by physicians (both p < .001) and to be without errors (p < .001). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurse practitioners practicing in specialist palliative care roles in communities and hospitals have embraced the use of POST and followed through on complete and accurate completion of the forms. With this signatory authority, primary and specialist NPs have the potential to improve end-of-life care.

Risco ocupacional entre profissionais de enfermagem de setores críticos e adesão a precaução padrão / Riesgos laborales entre las enfermeras de sectores críticos y adhesión de las precauciones estándar / Occupational risk between critical sectors nursing professionals and adherence to standard precaution

RESUMO Introdução: os profissionais de Enfermagem estão potencialmente expostos a acidentes ocupacionais, principalmente em setores críticos do ambiente hospitalar, devendo incorporar as precauções padrão, para minimizar este risco. A adesão as precauções padrão é fortemente influenciada por fatores psicossociais, devendo esta relação ser elucidada. Objetivo: apreender as representações sociais de profissionais da enfermagem sobre o risco ocupacional, e analisar sua relação com a adesão as precauções padrão. Métodos: pesquisa exploratória, de abordagem qualitativa, fundamentada na Teoria das Representações Sociais. Os participantes da pesquisa foram 150 trabalhadores de Enfermagem de setores críticos da rede hospitalar de Teresina, Piauí, Brasil. Os dados foram coletados por meio da técnica de associação livre de palavras, e analisados pela análise fatorial de correspondência. Resultados: o núcleo central das representações foi composto pelos vocábulos "cuidado", "habilidade técnica" e "normas". Registrou-se que, para profissionais de enfermagem com nível médio a representação do risco ocupacional esteve fortemente ligado á técnica, enquanto profissionais de nível superior forneceram á representação um enfoque mais biopsicológico. O domínio da técnica em procedimentos parece fornecer uma sensação de segurança que justifica a negligência no uso das medidas de precaução padrão. Conclusões: diferenças na forma de representar o risco ocupacional dentro de uma mesma categoria profissional configura-se em importante empecilho a adesão as medidas de precaução padrão. Essa diferença qualitativa possui potencial para influenciar, não somente nas taxas de adesão mas, na própria epidemiologia desses eventos e demonstra que não há, necessariamente, um senso comum dentro deste grupo profissional no que concerne a saúde ocupacional(AU)

RESUMEN Introducción: los profesionales de enfermería están potencialmente expuestos a accidentes de trabajo, especialmente en sectores críticos del hospital, y deben incorporar las precauciones estándar para minimizar este riesgo. La adhesión a las precauciones estándar está fuertemente influenciada por factores psicosociales, y se debe entender esta relación. Objetivo: identificar las representaciones sociales de los profesionales de enfermería sobre el riesgo ocupacional y evaluar su relación con el cumplimiento de las precauciones estándar. Métodos: investigación exploratoria, enfoque cualitativo, basado en la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales. Los participantes fueron 150 trabajadores de enfermería en sectores críticos de la red hospitalaria de Teresina, Piauí, Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de la técnica de la asociación libre de palabras, y se analizaron mediante análisis factorial de correspondencia. Resultados: el núcleo de las representaciones consistió en las palabras "cuidado", "habilidad técnica" y "normas". Se ha observado que para los profesionales de enfermería de nivel medio, la representación de riesgos laborales está fuertemente conectada a la técnica, mientras que los profesionales de nivel superior, a un enfoque más biopsicosocial. El campo de los procedimientos de la técnica parece proporcionar una sensación de seguridad que justifica la negligencia en el uso de las precauciones estándar. Conclusiones: las diferencias en la manera de representar el riesgo laboral dentro de los mismos conjuntos de categorías profesionales se configura en gran obstáculo para la adhesión a las precauciones estándar. Esta diferencia cualitativa tiene el potencial de influir no solo en las cuotas de adhesión, sino en la propia epidemiología de estos eventos, y demuestra que no existe necesariamente un sentido común dentro de este grupo profesional con respecto a la salud ocupacional(AU)

ABSTRACT Introduction: Nursing professionals are potentially exposed to occupational accidents, especially in critical sectors of the hospital environment and must incorporate the standard precautions to minimize this risk. Adherence to standard precautions is strongly influenced by psychosocial factors, should this relationship be understood. Objective: Identify the social representations of nursing professionals about the occupational risk and to assess their relationship with adherence to standard precautions. Methods: Exploratory research, qualitative approach, based on the Theory of Social Representations. The participants were 150 nursing workers in critical sectors of the hospital network of Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. Data were collected through the technique of free association of words, and analyzed by factorial analysis of correspondence. Results: The core of the representations consisted of the words "care", "technical skill" and "standards". It has observed that, for nursing professionals with mid-level representation of occupational risk was strongly connected to the technique, while top-level professionals provided will represent a more biopsychosocial approach. The field of technique procedures seems to provide a sense of security that justify negligence in the use of standard precautions. Conclusions: Differences in the way of representing the occupational hazard within the same professional category sets in major obstacle to adherence to standard precautions. This qualitative difference has the potential to influence not only on membership fees but in itself epidemiology of these events and shows that there is not necessarily a common sense within this professional group with regard to occupational health(AU)

Nurse practitioner malpractice data: Informing nursing education.

BACKGROUND: Nurse practitioners (NPs) are often identified in medical malpractice claims. However, the use of malpractice data to inform the development of nursing curriculum is limited. The purpose of this study is to examine medical errors committed by NPs. METHODS: Using National Practitioner Data Bank public use data, years 1990 to 2014, NP malpractice claims were classified by event type, patient outcome, setting, and number of practitioners involved. RESULTS: The greatest proportion of malpractice claims involving nurse practitioners were diagnosis related (41.46%) and treatment related (30.79%). Severe patient outcomes most often occurred in the outpatient setting. Nurse practitioners were independently responsible for the event in the majority of the analyzed claims. CONCLUSION: Moving forward, nurse practitioner malpractice data should be continuously analyzed and used to inform the development of nurse practitioner education standards and graduate program curriculum to address areas of clinical weakness and improve quality of care and patient safety.

Exploring the experience of nurse practitioners who have committed medical errors: A phenomenological approach.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To explore the experience of committing medical error from the perspective of nurse practitioners (NPs). Overall, the purpose of the study is to discern NPs' behaviors, perceptions, and coping mechanisms in response to having made a medical error. METHODS: Qualitative research based on two face-to-face audio-recorded semistructured interviews with 10 NPs who had made medical errors in practice. The analysis was guided by concepts in phenomenology. CONCLUSIONS: During iterative analyses, four overarching themes were identified: (a) The paradox of error victimization, (b) primacy of responsibility and mindfulness, (c) yearning for forgiveness and a supportive other, and (d) coping with a new reality is context dependent. The narratives strongly suggest that NPs who err experience "second victim" phenomena. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Reminiscing about the experience of living through an error, NPs shared meaningful insights into their need for a safe environment in which they could candidly share feelings, reflect on the experience, and ascertain the etiology of the mistake. Debriefing in a formal manner might prevent the development of permanent psychological injuries. Hence, inherent to the care of "second victims" is the notion of co-workers' fairness, compassion, and recognition of appropriate caring responses that contribute to effective coping and healing.

HIV screening intentions, behaviors, and practices among nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: HIV/AIDS is a significant public health issue for individuals living in the United States. Federal agencies and key stakeholders recommend routine HIV/AIDS screening among individuals aged 13-64 of age, yet few studies focus on the nurse practitioner's (NP) perspective. The purpose of this study was to examine routine HIV screening intentions, behaviors, and practices using a national sample of NPs. METHODS: Cross-sectional study utilizing a random sample of 600 NPs from the American Association of Nurse Practitioners™ organization. A total of 141 NPs returned complete responses to the paper and pencil questionnaire and were included in the study. CONCLUSIONS: One-quarter (25%, n = 35) of the NPs reported routine HIV screening behavior. Half (48%, n = 67) reported intentions to increase routine HIV screening in the next year. HIV screening practices were reported as risk-based and patient-initiated among this sample of NPs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In the U.S. healthcare system, NPs serve as leaders in primary and secondary prevention, screening and identifying individuals who are unaware of their HIV infection. Greater coordinated efforts and new system approaches are needed to help NPs adapt HIV screening recommendations and practice guidelines.