A computational study of the dual effect of intermittent and continuous administration of parathyroid hormone on bone remodeling.

Bone remodeling is a process known to be governed by constant interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast through complex pathway networks mediated by signaling factors. Experimental studies show that intermittent and continuous administration of PTH/PTHrP led to opposite outcomes in terms of bone mass. To investigate this dual effect of PTH/PTHrP, we develop a computational model based on a simplified signaling pathway network which includes relevant molecular effectors and cells. Multiple ordinary differential equations linking all considered components in the signaling pathway network through reaction kinetics are solved with dose values and patterns of injection from experiments as input. Modeling results show good agreement with experimental observations in that continuous injection of PTH/PTHrP generates catabolic effect on bone mass while intermittent injection yields anabolic effect. The signaling factors governing the interaction between osteoblast and osteoclast indeed play a key role in the dual effect of PTH/PTHrP. Furthermore, there appears to be an optimal interval for intermittent injection of PTH/PTHrP for yielding the most bone regeneration, and a synergistic outcome could be achieved by combining intermittent injection of PTH/PTHrP with application of a treatment (to mimic the filling of bone defects with polymeric scaffolds). This modeling work sheds valuable insights into the influence of temporal control of PTH/PTHrP on bone mass and presents a possible path toward bridging bioengineering approaches with clinical treatment strategies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A computational model considering simplified signaling pathways containing crucial components of PTH, PTHrP, osteoblast precursor, osteoblast, osteoclast precursor, osteoclast, RANKL and IL-6 family cytokoines has been developed to study the dual effect of PTH/PTHrP on bone metabolism. The model takes the dose values and patterns of injection from experiments as input and yields predictions that convincingly match experimental measurements. This work highlights the importance of providing an optimal hormone treatment strategy for maintaining healthy bone metabolism. Moreover, the integrative approach of relying on experimental observations to find reasonable values for relevant modeling parameters has been proven to be powerful in advancing our understanding of biological interactions among cells and signaling factors.

Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by loss of bone mass and strength affecting up to 30-50% of postmenopausal women worldwide. Current therapeutic options include antiresorptives such as aminobisphosphonates or denosumab and osteoanabolic compounds such as teriparatide. Areas covered: In this review, the authors summarize the clinical development, safety and efficacy profile of abaloparatide, a new osteoanabolic agent recently marketed in the US for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women who are at high risk for fracture or who fail antiresorptive therapy. Expert opinion: Abaloparatide is a 1-34 PTH related peptide-like molecule that has been modified in order to potentiate the osteoanabolic effect. In its pivotal phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, subcutaneous abaloparatide 80 mcg/day reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, major osteoporotic, and clinical fractures compared with placebo and reduced the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with teriparatide. These results, together with a reduced prevalence of hypercalcemia and a lower cost of the marketed compound, point toward improved cost effectiveness with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. However, some concerns have been raised due to a somewhat higher occurrence of adverse effects (particularly with palpitations and increased heart rate) or the resultant discontinuation due to these adverse effects when compared to teriparatide.