Bone morphogenetic protein and cancer in spinal fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) has been increasingly used in spinal surgery to promote arthrodesis. Because BMP stimulates cellular proliferation, its association with tumorigenesis is a concern. Previous research has generated conflicting conclusions on the risk of cancer in patients receiving BMP. The authors aimed to compare the incidence of solid organ and hematopoietic malignancies in patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis with or without BMP. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database was queried for patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion between 2015 and 2021. Patients with preexisting malignancy were excluded. Data were analyzed for incidence of solid organ malignancy and hematopoietic malignancy diagnosed after spinal surgery. Propensity score matching using age, sex, tobacco usage, and year of surgery was performed between patients who did and those who did not receive BMP. RESULTS: Among patients without prior solid organ malignancy, BMP was used in 22,139 patients and not used in 306,249. In the propensity score-matched group, 3.1% of the BMP group developed solid organ malignancy following surgery compared with 3.5% in the non-BMP group. The relative risk (RR) of developing solid organ malignancy after BMP exposure was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.98, p = 0.02). Among patients without prior hematopoietic malignancy, BMP was used in 23,505 patients and not used in 328,796 patients. In the propensity score-matched group, 0.4% of the BMP group developed hematopoietic malignancy compared with 0.6% of the non-BMP group. The RR of developing hematopoietic malignancy after BMP exposure was 0.71 (95% CI 0.55-0.93, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: BMP use in thoracolumbar fusion was not associated with an increased risk of new malignancy, which further supports emerging data on the lack of an association between BMP use and increased malignancy.

Postoperative Lumbar Fusion Bone Morphogenic Protein-Related Epidural Cyst Formation.

Bone morphogenetic protein is broadly used in spinal surgery to enhance fusion rates. Several complications have been associated with the use of bone morphogenetic protein, including postoperative radiculitis and pronounced bone resorption/osteolysis. Bone morphogenetic protein-related epidural cyst formation may represent another complication that has not been described aside from limited case reports. In this case series, we retrospectively reviewed imaging and clinical findings of 16 patients with epidural cysts on postoperative MR imaging following lumbar fusion. In 8 patients, mass effect on the thecal sac or lumbar nerve roots was noted. Of these, 6 patients developed new postoperative lumbosacral radiculopathy. During the study period, most patients were managed conservatively, and 1 patient required revision surgery with cyst resection. Concurrent imaging findings included reactive endplate edema and vertebral bone resorption/osteolysis. Epidural cysts had characteristic findings on MR imaging in this case series and may represent an important postoperative complication in patients following bone morphogenetic protein-augmented lumbar fusion.

Off-label usage of RhBMP-2 in posterior cervical fusion is not associated with early increased complication rate and has similar clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Arthrodesis is important for the success of posterior cervical fusion (PCF), however, there exists limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) in PCF. PURPOSE: The primary objective was to evaluate early postoperative complications associated with BMP in PCF and determine whether BMP leads to adverse early clinical outcomes. A secondary objective was to determine the optimal location for BMP sponge placement, within the facet joint (IF) or elsewhere, and the optimal dosage/level. DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seven hundred sixty-five patients who underwent PCF OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, arthrodesis, optimum dose/level of BMP METHODS: Surgical data, including preoperative diagnosis, levels fused, type of bone graft, BMP dose (when used), and fusion technique were recorded. Complications were assessed by reviewing the medical record encompassing the first 6-weeks postoperative. These included medical, neurological, and wound-related complications and reoperation. Neurological complications were defined as any new weakness, radicular pain, or numbness. PROs were collected, including SF36, VAS, EQ-5D, and NDI scores. To determine the optimal dosage and location for BMP placement, a sub-analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the BMP and no BMP group with regards to wound complications, neurological complications, or reoperation. There were no differences in PROs between BMP and no BMP. Placement of BMP for IF and at a dose of 0.87 mg/level minimized wound-related complications. The BMP group had a higher fusion rate compared to the no BMP group (96% vs. 91%, p=.02) when assessed 1 year post-operatively. CONCLUSION: BMP was not associated with a higher rate of early complications after PCF when the dose was minimized. Complications thought to be associated with BMP, such as compressive seroma, radiculitis, and wound-related complications were not seen at a higher rate. PROs at early follow-up were similar. Placement of BMP for IF and at lower doses than previously reported may minimize complications.

Complications, Costs, and Quality Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Cervical Deformity Surgery With Intraoperative BMP Use.

STUDY DESIGN: An epidemiological study using national administrative data from the MarketScan database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the impact of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: BMP has been shown to stimulate bone growth and improve fusion rates in spine surgery. However, the impact of BMP on reoperation rates and postoperative complication rate is controversial. METHODS: We queried the MarketScan database to identify patients who underwent ACD surgery from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified by BMP use in the index operation. Patients <18 years and those with any history of tumor or trauma were excluded. Baseline demographics and comorbidities, postoperative complication rates, and reoperation rates were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 13,549 patients underwent primary ACD surgery, of which 1155 (8.5%) had intraoperative BMP use. The overall 90-day complication rate was 27.6% in the non-BMP cohort and 31.1% in the BMP cohort (P < 0.05). Patients in the BMP cohort had longer average length of stay (4.0 days vs. 3.7 days, P < 0.05) but lower revision surgery rates at 90 days (14.5% vs. 28.3%, P < 0.05), 6 months (14.9% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.05), 1 year (15.7% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.05), and 2 years (16.5% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. BMP use was associated with higher payments throughout the 2-year follow-up period ($107,975 vs. $97,620, P < 0.05). When controlling for baseline group differences, BMP use independently increased the odds of postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.4) and reduced the odds of reoperation throughout 2 years of follow-up (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.4-0.6). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative BMP use has benefits for fusion integrity in ACD surgery but is associated with increased postoperative complication rate. Spine surgeons should weigh these benefits and drawbacks to identify optimal candidates for BMP use in ACD surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Longer follow-up continues to reveal no increased risk of cancer with the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in spine fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Large observational studies on potential oncogenic effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) in spine fusion surgery are limited by relatively short follow-up times. PURPOSE: To study the possible association between rhBMP and cancer risk in a long-term follow-up study. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using a combination of the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System, the Washington State Cancer Registry, State of Washington death certificates, and the Washington State Department of Licensing. PATIENT SAMPLE: Participants were adults age ≥21 years who underwent spine fusion surgery enhanced by rhBMP for degenerative spine disease between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2010. A comparison group matching each patient receiving rhBMP with three patients not receiving rhBMP was created using the indicators of age, sex, and year of treatment. We excluded patients receiving spine fusion for vertebral fractures or infection, and those with a diagnosis of cancer before or at the index procedure. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the first diagnosis of any cancer as identified in the records of the state cancer registry or death certificate through the end of 2015. METHODS: We compared cancer risk between those receiving spine fusion with and without rhBMP using survival analysis. We calculated incidence rates (hazards) by computing the ratio of the number of events and total time at risk. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted HR (aHR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated assuming a Cox proportional hazard regression model. We adjusted the model to include the site of surgery (lumbar vs. cervical) as a covariate as this differed in frequency between the two treatment groups. To assess whether rhBMP adversely affects the progression of cancer, we compared mortality between rhBMP users and nonusers in those who developed cancer. Research support toward this study was received from Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA. The investigators alone, and not Medtronic, were solely responsible for the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of this study. RESULTS: We included 16,914 patients who had spine fusion, of whom 4,246 received rhBMP. During the study period, 1,342 patients were diagnosed with some form of cancer. The incidence rate was similar between the two groups: 11.2 per 1,000 person years in the rhBMP group and 10.4 per 1,000 person years in the non-rhBMP group, with an aHR of 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.10. Similarly, rhBMP use was not associated with an increased risk of commonly occurring individual cancer types, nor with cancer specific mortality after a cancer diagnosis, aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.22. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up confirms previous findings that rhBMP application treated with elective spinal fusion did not result in an increased cancer risk in a large population of US adults.

Bone Morphogenetic Protein Usage in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Else Can Go Wrong?

BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) graft showed promising outcome during early phases of its use. However, unreported adverse events and off-label use shattered its safe profile and raised concerns regarding its indication. In 2008 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration prohibited its use in anterior cervical spine procedures due to the possibility of edema, hematoma, and need to intubate. At the molecular level, BMPs act as multifactorial growth factors playing a role in cartilage, heart, and bone formation. However, its unfavorable effect on bone overgrowth or heterotopic ossification post spine surgeries has been described. Reported cases in the literature were limited to epidural bone formation. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a rare and interesting case of a 59-year-old female, in whom BMP caused intradural bone growth several years after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. CONCLUSION: Caution must be exercised while using BMPs because of inadvertent complications.

Bone Morphogenic Protein Use in Spinal Surgery.

Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) provides excellent enhancement of fusion in many spinal surgeries. BMP should be a cautionary tale about the use of industry-sponsored research, perceived conflicts of interest, and holding the field of spinal surgery to the highest academic scrutiny and ethical standards. In the case of BMP, not having a transparent base of literature as it was approved led to delays in allowing this superior technology to help patients.

Complication Rates After Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Use in Orthopaedic Surgery in Children: A Concise Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) has been associated with a number of complications in adult patients. However, this association is less established in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of BMP use in children by determining the complication rates after BMP use at multiple institutions. METHODS: In a retrospective study (2000 to 2013), the medical records of all patients who received BMP at any of the 5 institutions were reviewed. Demographic information, preoperative data, and postoperative follow-up data were collected on those patients who were under the age of 18 at the time of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 312 pediatric patients underwent surgery with BMP application during the study period. The surgical procedures consisted of 228 spinal fusions, 39 pars repairs, 33 nonunion repair, and 12 other various procedures. Overall 21% (65/312) of patients who had BMP utilized had a complication. Fifty-five percent (36/65) of patients with a complication required a revision surgery. The average follow-up was 27 months (range, 3 to 96 mo); 80% of patients had a follow-up period of >12 months. The average age at the time of surgery was 13 years (range, 1 to 17 y). Males and females were almost equally represented in the study: 143 males (46%) and 168 females (54%). Of the patients who received BMP, 9% had minor complications and 13% had major complications. Wound dehiscence without infection was the most common minor complication and occurred in 59% (16/27) of patients with minor complications. Infection and implant failures were the most frequent major complications, occurring in 38% (15/39) and 33% (13/39) of patients with major complications, respectively. Five of 312 (2%) patients had neurological injury, 3 of which were only temporary. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study demonstrates a relatively high rate of complications after the use of BMP in children. However, further study is needed to attribute the complications directly to the use of BMP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Bone Morphogenetic Protein Use and Cancer Risk Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Arthrodesis: A Case-Cohort Study Using the SEER-Medicare Database.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are growth factors utilized in lumbar arthrodeses. Limited data from randomized trials suggest that BMP may increase cancer risk. We sought to evaluate cancer risk and mortality following the use of BMP in lumbar arthrodesis. METHODS: Within the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program-Medicare cohort, we conducted a case-cohort study of 7,278 individuals who were ≥65 years of age and had undergone a lumbar arthrodesis from 2004 to 2011. Of these patients, 3,627 were individuals in a 5% random subcohort of Medicare enrollees in SEER areas including 191 who developed cancer, and there were 3,651 individuals outside the subcohort who developed cancer. Weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cancer on the basis of exposure to BMP. RESULTS: In the SEER-Medicare subcohort, 30.7% of individuals who underwent a lumbar arthrodesis received BMP. BMP was not associated with overall cancer risk in univariate analyses (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.02]) or after adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, hospital size, history of cancer, and calendar year (adjusted HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.05]). Individual cancer types were also not significantly elevated (p > 0.05 for all) in BMP users compared with nonusers. In addition, BMP use was not associated with a new cancer in people who had cancer prior to undergoing lumbar arthrodesis (adjusted HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.52]) or with mortality after a cancer diagnosis (adjusted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.19]). CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of elderly U.S. adults undergoing lumbar arthrodesis, BMP use was not associated with cancer risk or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.

OBJECT: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is frequently used for spinal arthrodesis procedures in an "off-label" fashion. Whereas complications related to BMP usage are well recognized, the role of dosage is less clear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess dose-dependent effectiveness (i.e., bone fusion) and morbidity of BMP used in common spinal arthrodesis procedures. A quantitative exploratory meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting fusion and complication rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical fusion (PCF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) supplemented with BMP. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies on BMP in spinal fusion procedures reporting fusion and/or complication rates. From the included studies, a database for each spinal fusion procedure, including patient demographic information, dose of BMP per level, and data regarding fusion rate and complication rates, was created. The incidence of fusion and complication rates was calculated and analyzed as a function of BMP dose. The methodological quality of all included studies was assessed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. Event rates are shown as percentages, with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Forty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria: ACDF (n = 7), PCF (n = 6), ALIF (n = 9), TLIF/PLIF (n = 17), and PLF (n = 9), resulting in a total of 5890 patients. In ACDF, the lowest BMP concentration analyzed (0.2-0.6 mg/level) resulted in a fusion rate similar to the highest dose (1.1-2.1 mg/level), while permitting complication rates comparable to ACDF performed without BMP. The addition of BMP to multilevel constructs significantly (p < 0.001) increased the fusion rate (98.4% [CI 95.4%-99.4%]) versus the control group fusion rate (85.8% [CI 77.4%-91.4%]). Studies on PCF were of poor quality and suggest that BMP doses of ≤ 2.1 mg/level resulted in similar fusion rates as higher doses. Use of BMP in ALIF increased fusion rates from 79.1% (CI 57.6%-91.3%) in the control cohort to 96.9% (CI 92.3%-98.8%) in the BMP-treated group (p < 0.01). The rate of complications showed a positive correlation with the BMP dose used. Use of BMP in TLIF had only a minimal impact on fusion rates (95.0% [CI 92.8%-96.5%] vs 93.0% [CI 78.1%-98.0%] in control patients). In PLF, use of ≥ 8.5 mg BMP per level led to a significant increase of fusion rate (95.2%; CI 90.1%-97.8%) compared with the control group (75.3%; CI 64.1%-84.0%, p < 0.001). BMP did not alter the rate of complications when used in PLF. CONCLUSIONS: The BMP doses used for various spinal arthrodesis procedures differed greatly between studies. This study provides BMP dosing recommendations for the most common spine procedures.

Local rhBMP-12 on an Absorbable Collagen Sponge as an Adjuvant Therapy for Rotator Cuff Repair - A Phase 1, Randomized, Standard of Care Control, Multicenter Study: Safety and Feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-12 (rhBMP-12) has been shown to induce tendon and ligament formation in rats and to improve tendon healing; however, the safety and feasibility of implanting rhBMP-12/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) in humans are not known. PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of rhBMP-12 on an ACS as an adjuvant therapy in open rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This study consisted of 20 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Patients were randomized either to standard of care (SOC) treatment (open rotator cuff repair) or to receive 0.015 mg/mL rhBMP-12/ACS and SOC treatment during their open rotator cuff repair (rhBMP-12/ACS group) at a rate of 1/4 SOC/rhBMP-12/ACS. The feasibility of implanting the product and the safety of the product were evaluated during the 1-year follow-up period. The evaluation involved up to 10 postoperative visits, which included physical examinations, radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with an emphasis on heterotopic ossification (HO), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, laboratory evaluations, and local and systemic adverse events at specified time points. RESULTS: Small amounts of HO were seen on follow-up CT scans in 10 of 16 patients in the rhBMP-12/ACS group and in 2 of 3 patients in the SOC group. HO did not increase at 26 weeks and was not associated with any adverse events or unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Pharmacokinetics demonstrated that circulating levels of rhBMP-12 were not detectable after administration. Five of 16 patients showed a postoperative immunogenic response but did not show any correlating adverse events. Complete healing of the rotator cuff was observed in 14 of 16 patients; 2 of 16 imaging results could not be analyzed because of artifacts in the rhBMP-12 group on MRI scans. In the SOC group, 1 of 4 patients showed a retear at 12 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of rhBMP-12/ACS has been shown to be feasible and safe in a concentration of 0.015 mg/mL when used in open rotator cuff repair. Higher dose concentrations of rhBMP-12 should be evaluated in the future to evaluate their safety and potential to increase rotator cuff healing after open surgical repair.

A comprehensive assessment of the risk of bone morphogenetic protein use in spinal fusion surgery and postoperative cancer diagnosis.

The risk of postoperative cancer following the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 in spinal fusion is one potential complication that has received significant interest. Until recently, there has been little clinical evidence to support the assertion of potential cancer induction after BMP use in spinal surgery. This report aims to summarize the findings from clinical data available to date from the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) project as well as more recently published large database studies regarding the association of BMP use in spinal fusion and the risk of postoperative cancer. A detailed review was based on online databases, primary studies, FDA reports, and bibliographies of key articles for studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of BMP in spinal fusion. In an analysis of the YODA project, one meta-analysis detected a statistically significant increase in cancer occurrence at 24 months but not at 48 months, and the other meta-analysis did not detect a significant increase in postoperative cancer occurrence. Analysis of 3 large health care data sets (Medicare, MarketScan, and PearlDiver) revealed that none were able to detect a significant increase in risk of malignant cancers when BMP was used compared with controls. The potential risk of postoperative cancer formation following the use of BMP in spinal fusion must be interpreted on an individual basis for each patient by the surgeon. There is no conclusive evidence that application of the common formulations of BMP during spinal surgery results in the formation of cancer locally or at a distant site.

Use of bone morphogenetic protein among patients undergoing fusion for degenerative diagnoses in the United States, 2002 to 2012.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) as an adjunct to spinal fusion surgery proliferated after Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2002. Major safety concerns emerged in 2008. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether published concerns about the safety of BMP altered clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The study design involved the analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 through 2012. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adults (older than 20 years) undergoing an elective fusion operation for common degenerative diagnoses were identified using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were proportion of cervical and lumbar fusion operations, over time, that involved BMP. METHODS: We aggregated the data into a monthly time series and reported the proportion of cervical and lumbar fusion operations, over time, that involved BMP. Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, a regression model for time series data, was used to test whether there was a statistically significant change in the overall rate of BMP use after an FDA Public Health Notification in 2008. RESULTS: Use of BMP in spinal fusion procedures increased rapidly until 2008, involving up to 45.2% of lumbar and 13.5% of cervical fusions. Bone morphogenetic protein use significantly decreased after the 2008 FDA Public Health Notification and revelations of financial payments to surgeons involved in the pivotal FDA-approved trials. For lumbar fusion, the average annual increase was 7.9 percentage points per year from 2002 to 2008, followed by an average annual decrease of 11.7 percentage points thereafter (p≤.001). Use of BMP in cervical fusion increased 2.0% per year until the FDA Public Health Notification, followed by a 2.8% per year decrease (p=.035). CONCLUSIONS: Use of BMP in spinal fusion surgery declined subsequent to published safety concerns and revelations of financial conflicts of interest for investigators involved in the pivotal clinical trials.

The controversy surrounding bone morphogenetic proteins in the spine: a review of current research.

Bone morphogenetic proteins have been in use in spinal surgery since 2002. These proteins are members of the TGF-beta superfamily and guide mesenchymal stem cells to differentiate into osteoblasts to form bone in targeted tissues. Since the first commercial BMP became available in 2002, a host of research has supported BMPs and they have been rapidly incorporated in spinal surgeries in the United States. However, recent controversy has arisen surrounding the ethical conduct of the research supporting the use of BMPs. Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) recently teamed up with Medtronic to offer a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of BMPs in spinal surgery. This review focuses on the history of BMPs and examines the YODA research to guide spine surgeons in their use of BMP in spinal surgery.

Bone morphogenetic protein-associated complications in pediatric spinal fusion in the early postoperative period: an analysis of 4658 patients and review of the literature.

OBJECT: Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 has risen steadily since its approval by the FDA for use in anterior lumbar interbody fusion in 2002. The FDA has not approved the use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in children. Age less than 18 years or lack of evidence of epiphyseal closure are considered by the manufacturer to be contraindications to BMP use. In light of this, the authors performed a query of the database of one of the nation's largest health insurance companies to determine the rate of BMP use and complications in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: The authors used the PearlDiver Technologies private payer database containing all records from United Health-Care from 2005 to 2011 to query all cases of pediatric spinal fusion with or without BMP use. A review of the literature was also performed to examine the complications associated with BMP use in pediatric spinal fusion. RESULTS: A total of 4658 patients underwent spinal fusion. The majority was female (65.4%), and the vast majority was age 10-19 years (94.98%) and underwent thoracolumbar fusion (93.13%). Bone morphogenetic protein was used in 1752 spinal fusions (37.61%). There was no difference in the rate of BMP use when comparing male and female patients or age 10 years or older versus less than 10 years. Anterior cervical fusions were significantly less likely to use BMP (7.3%). Complications occurred in 9.82% of patients treated with versus 9.88% of patients treated without BMP. The complication rate was nearly identical in male versus female patients and in patients older versus younger than 10 years. Comparison of systemic, wound-related, CNS, and other complications showed no difference between groups treated with and without BMP. The reoperation rate was also nearly identical. CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein is used in a higher than expected percentage of pediatric spinal fusions. The rate of acute complications in these operations does not appear to be different in patients treated with versus those treated without BMP. Caution must be exercised in interpreting these data due to the many limitations of the administrative database as a data source, including the short length of follow-up.

Neoplasia following use of BMPs: is there an increased risk?

INTRODUCTION: Bone morphogenetic proteins are multi-functional growth factors, which play an important role in embryonic development and cellular functions. Among several molecules in this family, BMP-2 and BMP-7 are currently being used in the clinical setting. Main clinical targets include the treatment of non-union, open fractures and spinal fusion. Their use has not been without complications, one of which might be a carcinogenic effect. AREAS COVERED: The authors offer a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the clinical studies analysing the role of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) on carcinogenesis. The authors analyse the available literature and describe potential signalling pathways that can be affected as per available experimental in vitro and in vivo models. EXPERT OPINION: The available experimental data and clinical evidence are rather inadequate to allow any safe scientific conclusions. Clinical studies provide incomplete evidence to support the hypothesis that BMPs are carcinogenic. The available literature has several limitations including incomplete documentation, unreported data and inhered bias as a large number of trials have been funded by the industry. The need of well-structured studies is essential to address these safety concerns.

Usage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in cervical spine procedures: analysis of the MarketScan longitudinal database.

BACKGROUND: Usage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures is controversial. Studies suggest increased rates of dysphagia, hematoma or seroma, and severe airway compromise in anterior cervical spine procedures using rhBMP. The purpose of the present study was to determine and describe national utilization trends and complication rates associated with rhBMP usage in anterior cervical spine procedures. METHODS: The MarketScan database from 2006 to 2010 was retrospectively queried to identify 91,543 patients who underwent ACDF with or without cervical corpectomy. Patient selection and outcomes were ascertained with use of ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) and CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) coding. A total of 3197 patients were treated with rhBMP intraoperatively. Mean follow-up was 588 days (interquartile range [IQR], 205 to 886 days) in the non-treated cohort and 591 days (IQR, 203 to 925 days) in the rhBMP-treated cohort. Multivariate logistic regression as well as propensity score analysis were used to evaluate the association of rhBMP usage with postoperative complications. RESULTS: In propensity score-adjusted models, rhBMP usage was associated with an increased risk of any complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 1.5) and specific complications such as hematoma or seroma (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.4 to 2.3), dysphagia (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.5), and any pulmonary complication (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.8) within thirty days postoperatively. There were no significant differences in the rates of readmission, in-hospital mortality, referral to pain management, new malignancy, or reoperation between the two cohorts. Usage of rhBMP was associated with a mean increase of $5545 (19%) in total payments to the hospital and primary physician (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found an increased overall rate of postoperative complications in patients receiving rhBMP for cervical spinal fusion procedures compared with patients not receiving rhBMP. Hematoma or seroma, pulmonary complications, and dysphagia were also more common in the rhBMP cohort. Usage of rhBMP in a case was associated with $311 greater payments to the surgeon and $4213 greater payments to the hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cancer risk from bone morphogenetic protein exposure in spinal arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration reported a higher incidence of cancer in patients who had spinal arthrodesis and were exposed to a high dose of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) compared with the control group in a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of cancer after spinal arthrodesis with BMP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of cancer in 467,916 Medicare patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis from 2005 to 2010. Patients with a preexisting diagnosis of cancer were excluded. The average follow-up duration was 2.85 years for the BMP group and 2.94 years for the control group. The main outcome measure was the relative risk of developing new malignant lesions after spinal arthrodesis with or without exposure to BMP. RESULTS: The relative risk of developing cancer after BMP exposure was 0.938 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.913 to 0.964), which was significant. In the BMP group, 5.9% of the patients developed an invasive cancer compared with 6.5% of the patients in the control group. The relative risk of developing cancer after BMP exposure was 0.98 in males (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.02) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97) in females. The control group showed a higher incidence of each type of cancer except pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Recent clinical use of BMP was not associated with a detectable increase in the risk of cancer within a mean 2.9-year time window. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.